Search

Using vector acoustic sensors for marine geoacoustic surveys instead of the usual scalar hydrophones enables one to acquire three-dimensional (3D) survey data with instrumentation and logistics similar to current 2D surveys. Vector acoustic sensors measure the sound wave direction directly without the cumbersome arrays that hydrophones require. This concept was tested by a scaled experiment in an acoustic water tank that had a well-controlled environment with a few targets. Using vector acoustic data from a single line of sources, the three-dimensional tank environment was imaged by directly locating the source and all reflectors.

An enhanced simulated annealing algorithm is used to invert sparsely sampled seismic data collected with sonobuoys to obtain seafloor geoacoustic properties at two littoral marine environments as well as for a synthetic data set. Inversion of field data from a 750-m water-depth site using a water-gun sound source found a good solution which included a pronounced subbottom reflector after 6483 iterations over seven variables. Field data from a 250-m water-depth site using an air-gun source required 35,421 iterations for a good inversion solution because 30 variables had to be solved for, including the shot-to-receiver offsets. The sonobuoy derived compressional wave velocity-depth (Vp-Z) models compare favorably with Vp-Z models derived from nearby, high-quality, multichannel seismic data. There are, however, substantial differences between seafloor reflection coefficients calculated from field models and seafloor reflection coefficients based on commonly used Vp regression curves (gradients). Reflection loss is higher at one field site and lower at the other than predicted from commonly used Vp gradients for terrigenous sediments. In addition, there are strong effects on reflection loss due to the subseafloor interfaces that are also not predicted by Vp gradients.