Search

Background: Recent studies suggest differences in quality and timeliness of care received may be major contributing sources to the racial disparity in breast cancer detection and related outcomes.Methods: Female patients with breast cancer diagnosed during 1985-1993 (n=400) and followed through June 20, 2001, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Three white patients were selected randomly and matched to each black patient by year of diagnosis. Method and timing of diagnosis and timing of treatment were abstracted from medical records. Initial staging and subsequent breast cancer recurrence and vital status were obtained from the Hospital and Connecticut State Tumor Registry.Results: Black women were more likely than white women to be diagnosed after a patient-noted abnormality. Black women were less likely than white women to have completed a diagnostic evaluation within 30 days after a patient-noted abnormality (P <0.01) or after having an abnormality noted on screening mammogram (P=0.0001) and were less likely to have initiated treatment within 30 days of diagnosis (P=0.0001). Women diagnosed after a patient-noted abnormality were more likely to have subsequent breast cancer recurrence and/or death due to breast cancer compared with women diagnosed after a screening mammogram (56% versus 24%, respectively, P <0.05).Conclusions: Racial differences were identified at each step in the evaluation and treatment clinical pathway, including method of detection, timing from first symptoms of cancer to pathologic diagnosis, and timing from diagnosis to initiation of treatment. The findings highlight the need to provide equal opportunity for timely medical care and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We evaluated the association between metabolic syndrome (obesity plus two metabolic risk factors) and breast cancer outcomes according to molecular subtype., Methods: This population-based prospective cohort consisted of 3,267 women aged 20-69 diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast cancer from 2004-2015 in the Seattle-Puget Sound region. Breast cancer was categorized into three subtypes based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression: luminal (ER+), triple-negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-), and HER2-overexpressing (H2E) (ER-/HER2+). We used time-varying Cox models to assess the association between prevalent and incident metabolic syndrome and risks of recurrence, breast cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality., Results: Metabolic syndrome was associated with a greater risk of recurrence (HR:3.24; 95% CI:1.13-9.33) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR:5.34; 95% CI:2.32-12.31) only for the H2E subtype, and greater risks of all-cause mortality for luminal (HR:1.92; 95% CI:1.37-2.68), H2E (HR:5.09; 95% CI:2.51-10.32), and all cases combined (HR:1.90; 95% CI:1.42,2.53). We also observed heterogeneity in recurrence and mortality outcomes across specific components of metabolic syndrome and molecular subtypes., Conclusions: Metabolic syndrome is associated with all-cause mortality among women with breast cancer and with breast cancer-specific mortality among women with the H2E subtype., Impact: These results highlight the importance of managing comorbidities to decrease the risk for adverse outcomes among breast cancer survivors.

PET/CT using 16α-[ 18 F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol (FES) noninvasively images tissues expressing estrogen receptors (ERs). FES has undergone extensive clinicopathologic validation for ER-positive breast cancer and in 2020 received FDA approval for clinical use as an adjunct to biopsy in patients with recurrent or metastatic ER-positive breast cancer. Clinical use of FES PET/CT is increasing but is not widespread in the United States. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review explores the present status and future directions of FES PET/CT, including image interpretation, existing and emerging uses, knowledge gaps, and current controversies. Specific controversies discussed include whether both FES PET/CT and FDG PET/CT are warranted in certain scenarios, whether further workup is required after negative FES PET/CT results, whether FES PET/CT findings should inform endocrine therapy selection, and whether immunohistochemistry should remain the stand-alone reference standard for determining ER status for all breast cancers. Consensus opinions from the panel include agreement with the appropriate clinical uses of FES PET/CT published by a multidisciplinary expert work group in 2023, anticipated expanded clinical use of FES PET/CT for staging ER-positive invasive lobular carcinomas and low-grade invasive ductal carcinomas pending ongoing clinical trial results, and the need for further research regarding the use of FES PET/CT for nonbreast malignancies expressing ER.

Background: Standard measures of response such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors are ineffective for bone lesions, often making breast cancer patients that have bone-dominant metastases ineligible for clinical trials with potentially helpful therapies. In this study we prospectively evaluated the test-retest uptake variability of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ( 18 F-FDG) in a cohort of breast cancer patients with bone-dominant metastases to determine response criteria. The thresholds for 95% specificity of change versus no-change were then applied to a second cohort of breast cancer patients with bone-dominant metastases., Methods: For this study, nine patients with 38 bone lesions were imaged with 18 F-FDG in the same calibrated scanner twice within 14 days. Tumor uptake was quantified by the most commonly used PET parameter, the maximum tumor voxel normalized by dose and body weight (SUVmax) and also by the mean of a 1-cc maximal uptake volume normalized by dose and lean-body-mass (SULpeak). The asymmetric repeatability coefficients with confidence intervals for SUVmax and SULpeak were used to determine the limits of 18 F-FDG uptake variability. A second cohort of 28 breast cancer patients with bone-dominant metastases that had 146 metastatic bone lesions was imaged with 18 F-FDG before and after standard-of-care therapy for response assessment., Results: The mean relative difference of SUVmax and SULpeak in 38 bone tumors of the first cohort were 4.3% and 6.7%. The upper and lower asymmetric limits of the repeatability coefficient were 19.4% and - 16.3% for SUVmax, and 21.2% and - 17.5% for SULpeak. 18 F-FDG repeatability coefficient confidence intervals resulted in the following patient stratification using SULpeak for the second patient cohort: 11-progressive disease, 5-stable disease, 7-partial response, and 1-complete response with three inevaluable patients. The asymmetric repeatability coefficients response criteria for SULpeak changed the status of 3 patients compared to the standard Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors of ± 30% SULpeak., Conclusion: In evaluating bone tumor response for breast cancer patients with bone-dominant metastases using 18 F-FDG SUVmax, the repeatability coefficients from test-retest studies show that reductions of more than 17% and increases of more than 20% are unlikely to be due to measurement variability. Serial 18 F-FDG imaging in clinical trials investigating bone lesions in these patients, such as the ECOG-ACRIN EA1183 trial, benefit from confidence limits that allow interpretation of response., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: This study evaluates the relationship between smoking, alcohol, and breast cancer outcomes according to molecular subtype., Methods: This population-based prospective cohort consisted of 3,876 women ages 20 to 69 diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast cancer from 2004 to 2015 in the Seattle-Puget Sound region. Breast cancer was categorized into three subtypes based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expressions: luminal (ER+), triple-negative (TN; ER-/PR-/HER2-), and HER2-overexpressing (H2E; ER-/HER2+). We fit Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association between alcohol consumption and smoking status at diagnosis and risks of recurrence, breast cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality., Results: Histories of ever smoking [HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.74] and current smoking (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07-2.35) were associated with greater risk of breast cancer recurrence among TN cases. Smoking was also associated with greater risk of recurrence to bone among all cases and among luminal cases. Elevated risks of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality were observed among current smokers across all subtypes. Alcohol use was not positively associated with risk of recurrence or mortality overall; however, TN patients who drank four or more drinks per week had a decreased risk of recurrence (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.98) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.97) compared with non-current drinkers., Conclusions: Patients with breast cancer with a history of smoking at diagnosis have elevated risks of recurrence and mortality., Impact: These findings underscore the need to prioritize smoking cessation among women diagnosed with breast cancer., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objectives: Angiosarcoma is a rare complication of breast-conserving therapy. This study evaluated the change in incidence between 1992 and 2016 of secondary breast angiosarcoma (SBA) in patients with a history of breast cancer and the impact of management strategies for the original breast carcinoma on angiosarcoma treatment., Methods: Breast cancer and angiosarcoma cases were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. SBAs were defined as angiosarcomas located in the breast occurring after a prior breast cancer diagnosis. Primary breast angiosarcomas (PBAs) were defined as an angiosarcoma diagnosis listed as "one primary only." Incidence rates were estimated using a proportion of the US total population. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association of clinicopathologic characteristics on overall survival., Results: Between 1992 and 2016, 193 cases of SBA were reported in the SEER dataset in patients with a prior history of breast cancer. The incidence of breast angiosarcoma in patients with a prior diagnosis of breast cancer increased 3-fold from about 10 cases per 100,000 person-years to about 30 cases per 100,000 person-years over this same period ( P =0.0037). For treatment of SBA (n=193), almost all (95%) had surgery. Nine percent received radiation (compared with 35% of patients with PBA, P <0.001) and 23% received chemotherapy (vs. 45% for PBA, P =0.11)., Conclusions: We demonstrate an increasing incidence of SBA over the study period. These data can help inform shared decision-making for optimal management of locoregional breast cancer and raise awareness of secondary angiosarcoma., Competing Interests: E.T.L.—Clinical trial funding from BioAtla, Ayala, and SpringWorks. L.D.C.—Clinical trial funding from Eli Lilly, AADi, BluePrint Medicine, Iterion, Gradalis, Philogen, Advenchen Laboratories, and CBA Pharma. Honoraria or has served on advisory boards for Daaichi Sankyo. M.J.W.—Clinical trial support from Deciphera, Adaptimmune, GSK, Athenex, Foghorn Therapeutics, Shaqsi, Presage Biosciences, Inhibrx, and Incyte. Consulting fees from Adaptimmune, Epizyme, Aadi, and Deciphera. H.M.L.—Research funding from Tolmar, EliLilly, GE Healthcare, Sanofi, and Zymeworks. Consulting for GE Healthcare, Novartis, Sanofi, and Eli Lilly. J.M.S.—Research funding from Celcuity, Genentech, Xencor, Pfizer, SeaGen, Merck, Carisma, and Lyell. Consultant/advisory boards: A2 Biotherapeutics, Volastra Therapeutics, GE Healthcare, Sensei Therapeutics, and GlaxoSmithKline. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate combined MRI and 18 F-FDG PET for assessing breast tumor metabolism/perfusion mismatch and predicting pathological response and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in women treated for breast cancer., Methods: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally-advanced breast cancer were imaged at three timepoints (pre, mid, and post-NAC), prior to surgery. Imaging included diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) MRI and quantitative 18 F-FDG PET. Tumor imaging measures included apparent diffusion coefficient, peak percent enhancement (PE), peak signal enhancement ratio (SER), functional tumor volume, and washout volume on MRI and standardized uptake value (SUVmax), glucose delivery (K 1 ) and FDG metabolic rate (MRFDG) on PET, with percentage changes from baseline calculated at mid- and post-NAC. Associations of imaging measures with pathological response (residual cancer burden [RCB] 0/I vs. II/III) and RFS were evaluated., Results: Thirty-five patients with stage II/III invasive breast cancer were enrolled in the prospective study (median age: 43, range: 31-66 years, RCB 0/I: N = 11/35, 31%). Baseline imaging metrics were not significantly associated with pathologic response or RFS (p > 0.05). Greater mid-treatment decreases in peak PE, along with greater post-treatment decreases in several DCE-MRI and 18 F-FDG PET measures were associated with RCB 0/I after NAC (p < 0.05). Additionally, greater mid- and post-treatment decreases in DCE-MRI (peak SER, washout volume) and 18 F-FDG PET (K 1 ) were predictive of prolonged RFS. Mid-treatment decreases in metabolism/perfusion ratios (MRFDG/peak PE, MRFDG/peak SER) were associated with improved RFS., Conclusion: Mid-treatment changes in both PET and MRI measures were predictive of RCB status and RFS following NAC. Specifically, our results indicate a complementary relationship between DCE-MRI and 18 F-FDG PET metrics and potential value of metabolism/perfusion mismatch as a marker of patient outcome., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

PET imaging with 16α- 18 F-fluoro-17β-fluoroestradiol ( 18 F-FES), a radiolabeled form of estradiol, allows whole-body, noninvasive evaluation of estrogen receptor (ER). 18 F-FES is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a diagnostic agent "for the detection of ER-positive lesions as an adjunct to biopsy in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer." The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) convened an expert work group to comprehensively review the published literature for 18 F-FES PET in patients with ER-positive breast cancer and to establish appropriate use criteria (AUC). The findings and discussions of the SNMMI 18 F-FES work group, including example clinical scenarios, were published in full in 2022 and are available at https://www.snmmi.org/auc Of the clinical scenarios evaluated, the work group concluded that the most appropriate uses of 18 F-FES PET are to assess ER functionality when endocrine therapy is considered either at initial diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer or after progression of disease on endocrine therapy, the ER status of lesions that are difficult or dangerous to biopsy, and the ER status of lesions when other tests are inconclusive. These AUC are intended to enable appropriate clinical use of 18 F-FES PET, more efficient approval of FES use by payers, and promotion of investigation into areas requiring further research. This summary includes the rationale, methodology, and main findings of the work group and refers the reader to the complete AUC document., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Purpose: GDC-0810 (ARN-810) is a novel, non-steroidal, orally bioavailable, selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that potentially inhibits ligand-dependent and ligand-independent estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated signaling., Methods: A phase Ia/Ib/IIa dose escalation, combination treatment with palbociclib or a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, and expansion study determined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GDC-0810 in postmenopausal women with ER + (HER2 -) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Baseline plasma ctDNA samples were analyzed to determine the ESR1 mutation status., Results: Patients (N = 152) received GDC-0810 100-800 mg once daily (QD) or 300-400 mg twice daily, in dose escalation, expansion, as single agent or combination treatment. Common adverse events regardless of attribution to study drug were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, and constipation. There was one dose-limiting toxicity during dose escalation. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. GDC-0810 600 mg QD taken with food was the RP2D. Pharmacokinetics were predictable. FES reduction (> 90%) highlighting pharmacodynamic engagement of ER was observed. Outcomes for the overall population and for patients with tumors harboring ESR1 mutations included partial responses (4% overall; 4% ESR1), stable disease (39% overall; 42% ESR1), non-complete response/non-progressive disease (13% overall; 12% ESR1), progressive disease (40% overall; 38% ESR1), and missing/unevaluable (5% overall; 5% ESR1). Clinical benefit (responses or SD, lasting ≥ 24 weeks) was observed in patients in dose escalation (n = 16, 39%) and expansion (n = 24, 22%)., Conclusion: GDC-0810 was safe and tolerable with preliminary anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with ER + advanced/MBC, with/without ESR1 mutations, highlighting the potential for oral SERDs. Clinical Trial and registration date April 4, 2013. NCT01823835 ., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

AMEERA-1 is a Phase 1/2 open-label single-arm study evaluating once-daily (QD) amcenestrant, an orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader, in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (NCT03284957), who were mostly heavily pretreated (including targeted therapies and fulvestrant). In the dose escalation phase (Part A: n = 16), patients received amcenestrant 20-600 mg QD. Based on absence of dose-limiting toxicities, paired functional 18 F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography, and pharmacokinetics, 400 mg QD was selected as recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the dose expansion phase (Part B: n = 49). No Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events or clinically significant cardiac/eye toxicities were reported. The Part B primary endpoint, confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 3/45 at the interim analysis and 5/46 (10.9%) at the final analysis. The overall clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 13/46 (28.3%). CBRs among patients with baseline wild-type and mutated ESR1 were 9/26 (34.6%) and 4/19 (21.1%), respectively. Paired tumor biopsy and cell-free DNA analyses revealed ER inhibition and degradation, and a reduction in detectable ESR1 mutations, including Y537S. In conclusion, amcenestrant at RP2D of 400 mg QD for monotherapy is well-tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities, and demonstrates preliminary antitumor activity irrespective of baseline ESR1 mutation status., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). We hypothesized that adding sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activity, to an anthracycline and taxane regimen would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rates to a prespecified endpoint of 45% in patients with HER2-negative LABC or IBC., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, phase II trial of neoadjuvant sunitinib with paclitaxel (S+T) followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for patients with HER2-negative LABC or IBC. Patients received sunitinib 25 mg PO daily with paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 IV weekly ×12 followed by doxorubicin 24 mg/m 2 IV weekly + cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m 2 PO daily with G-CSF support. Response was evaluated using pCR in the breast and the CPS + EG score (clinical-pathologic scoring + estrogen receptor [ER] and grade)., Results: Seventy patients enrolled, and 66 were evaluable for efficacy. Eighteen patients (27%) had pCR in the breast (10 had ER + disease and 8 had triple-negative disease). When defining response as pCR and/or CPS + EG score ≤2, 31 (47%) were responders. In pateints with ER positive disease, 23 (64%) were responders. The most common toxicities were cytopenias and fatigue., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant S+T followed by AC+G-CSF was safe and tolerable in LABC and IBC. The study did not meet the prespecified endpoint for pCR; however, 47% were responders using pCR and/or CPS + EG score ≤2. ER positive patients had the highest response rate (64%). The addition of sunitinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may provide promising incremental benefit for patients with ER positive LABC., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors report they have conflicts of interest to disclose: JRG: Roche/Genentech (DSMC, Steering committee), Astra Zeneca (DSMC, consultant), Novartis (DSMC), Puma (advisory board), Immunomedics (DSMC), Radia (DSMC), Pfizer (advisory board), InBiomotion (advisory board), Sandoz/Hexal (Consultant), Genomic Health (advisory board) VG: SEngine Precision Medicine (ownership), AmunBio (Ownership), New Equilibrium Biosciences (Ownership), Seagen (Honoria/Consulting), Puma (Honoraria, Consulting), Sanofi (Honoraria/Consulting), Roche (research funding) BK: eResearch Technologies (Employer) AS: Amgen (grant funding/honoraria), AstraZeneca (consulting), Athenex (consulting) The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: This study evaluated the ability of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 18 F-Fluorothymidine (FLT) imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) to measure early response to endocrine therapy from baseline to just prior to surgical resection in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast tumors., Methods: In two separate studies, women with early stage ER+ breast cancer underwent either paired FDG-PET (n = 22) or FLT-PET (n = 27) scans prior to endocrine therapy and again in the pre-operative setting. Tissue samples for Ki-67 were taken for all patients both prior to treatment and at the time of surgery., Results: FDG maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) declined in 19 of 22 lesions (mean 17% (range -45 to 28%)). FLT SUVmax declined in 24 of 27 lesions (mean 26% (range -77 to 7%)). The Ki-67 index declined in both studies, from pre-therapy (mean 23% (range 1 to 73%)) to surgery [mean 8% (range < 1 to 41%)]. Pre- and post-therapy PET measures showed strong rank-order agreement with Ki-67 percentages for both tracers; however, the percent change in FDG or FLT SUVmax did not demonstrate a strong correlation with Ki-67 index change or Ki-67 at time of surgery., Conclusions: A window-of-opportunity approach using PET imaging to assess early response of breast cancer therapy is feasible. FDG and FLT-PET imaging following a short course of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy demonstrated measurable changes in SUVmax in early stage ER+ positive breast cancers. The percentage change in FDG and FLT-PET uptake did not correlate with changes in Ki-67; post-therapy SUVmax for both tracers was significantly associated with post-therapy Ki-67, an established predictor of endocrine therapy response., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) may overcome endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer. We tested whether 18 F-fluoroestradiol PET imaging would elucidate the pharmacodynamics of combination HDACIs and endocrine therapy. Methods: Patients with ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior clinical benefit from endocrine therapy but later progression on aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy were given vorinostat (400 mg daily) sequentially or simultaneously with AI. 18 F-fluoroestradiol PET and 18 F-FDG PET scans were performed at baseline, week 2, and week 8. Results: Eight patients were treated sequentially, and then 15 simultaneously. Eight patients had stable disease at week 8, and 6 of these 8 patients had more than 6 mo of stable disease. Higher baseline 18 F-fluoroestradiol uptake was associated with longer progression-free survival. 18 F-fluoroestradiol uptake did not systematically increase with vorinostat exposure, indicating no change in regional ER estradiol binding, and 18 F-FDG uptake did not show a significant decrease, as would have been expected with tumor regression. Conclusion: Simultaneous HDACIs and AI dosing in patients with cancer resistant to AI alone showed clinical benefit (6 or more months without progression) in 4 of 10 evaluable patients. Higher 18 F-fluoroestradiol PET uptake identified patients likely to benefit from combination therapy, but vorinostat did not change ER expression at the level of detection of 18 F-fluoroestradiol PET., (© 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Background: Evidence-based breast cancer treatment guidelines recommend the most appropriate course of therapy based on tumor characteristics and extent of disease. Evaluating the multilevel factors associated with guideline discordance is critical to identifying strategies to eliminate breast cancer survival disparities., Methods: We identified females diagnosed with a first primary, stage I-III breast cancer between the ages of 20-69 years of age from the population-based Seattle-Puget Sound Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Participants completed a survey about social support, utilization of patient support services, hypothesized barriers to care, and initiation of breast cancer treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: Among 1,390 participants, 10% reported guideline-discordant care. In analyses adjusted for patient-level sociodemographic factors, individuals who did not have someone to go with them to appointments or drive them home (OR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.09-3.59) and those who had problems talking to their doctors or their staff (OR 2.03; 95% CI, 1.13-3.64) were more likely to be guideline discordant than those with social support or without such problems, respectively. Use of patient support services was associated with a 43% lower odds of guideline discordance (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88)., Conclusions: Although guideline discordance in this cohort of early-stage breast cancer survivors diagnosed <70 years of age was low, instrumental social support, patient support services, and communication with doctors and their staff emerged as potential multilevel intervention targets for improving breast cancer care delivery., Impact: This study supports extending the reach of interventions designed to improve guideline concordance., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Estrogen receptor (ER) status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cancer tissue is currently used to direct endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol ( 18 F-FES) noninvasively characterizes ER ligand-binding function of breast cancer lesions. Concordance of imaging and tissue assays should be established for 18 F-FES PET to be an alternative or complement to tissue biopsy for metastatic lesions. We conducted a meta-analysis of published results comparing 18 F-FES PET and tissue assays of ER status in patients with breast cancer. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for English-language manuscripts with at least 10 patients and low overall risk of bias. Thresholds for imaging and tissue classification could differ between studies but had to be clearly stated. We used hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curve models for the meta-analysis. The primary analysis included 113 nonbreast lesions from 4 studies; an expanded analysis included 327 total lesions from 11 studies. Treating IHC results as the reference standard, sensitivity was 0.78 (95% confidence region 0.65-0.88) and specificity 0.98 (0.65-1.00) for the primary analysis of nonbreast lesions. In the expanded analysis including non-IHC tissue assays and all lesion sites, sensitivity was 0.81 (0.73-0.87) and specificity 0.86 (0.68-0.94). These results suggest that 18 F-FES PET is useful for characterization of ER status of metastatic breast cancer lesions. We also review current best practices for conducting 18 F-FES PET scans. This imaging assay has potential to improve clinically relevant outcomes for patients with (historically) ER-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases and/or lobular histology. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FES PET) imaging assesses estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in vivo. This work reviews the sensitivity and specificity of 18 F-FES PET in a meta-analysis with reference tissue assays and discusses best practices for use of the tracer as an imaging biomarker. 18 F-FES PET could enhance breast cancer diagnosis and staging as well as aid in therapy selection for patients with metastatic disease. Tissue sampling limitations, intrapatient heterogeneity, and temporal changes in molecular markers make it likely that 18 F-FES PET will complement existing assays when clinically available in the near future., (© AlphaMed Press 2020.)

Purpose: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with outcomes likely worsened by the presence of poorer outcomes among vulnerable populations such as the homeless. We hypothesized that homeless patients experience delays in biopsy, decreased appointment adherence, and increased overall mortality rates., Methods: We conducted a retrospective electronic medical record-based review of all patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; N = 133) between September 2012 and September 2018 at an academic county hospital in Seattle, Washington., Results: Of the 133 patients treated for NSCLC, 22 (17%) were homeless at the time of their treatment. Among homeless patients with localized lung cancer, the mean time from radiographic finding to biopsy was 248 days, compared with 116 days among housed patients ( P = .37). Homeless patients with advanced disease missed a mean of 26% of appointments in the year after diagnosis, compared with 16% among housed patients ( P = .03). Homeless patients with advanced NSCLC had a median survival of 0.58 years, versus 1.30 years in housed patients ( P = .48)., Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first US study comparing outcomes among homeless and housed patients with NSCLC within the same institution; we found homeless patients had longer delays to biopsy, increased rates of missed appointments, and a trend toward decreased survival. This study shows potential areas where interventions could be implemented to improve lung cancer outcomes in this patient population.

The Clinical Trial Design and Development Working Group within the Quantitative Imaging Network focuses on providing support for the development, validation, and harmonization of quantitative imaging (QI) methods and tools for use in cancer clinical trials. In the past 10 years, the Group has been working in several areas to identify challenges and opportunities in clinical trials involving QI and radiation oncology. The Group has been working with Quantitative Imaging Network members and the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance leadership to develop guidelines for standardizing the reporting of quantitative imaging. As a validation platform, the Group led a multireader study to test a semi-automated positron emission tomography quantification software. Clinical translation of QI tools cannot be possible without a continuing dialogue with clinical users. This article also highlights the outreach activities extended to cooperative groups and other organizations that promote the use of QI tools to support clinical decisions., (© 2020 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC.)

Purpose: To independently validate two biomarkers, a 44-gene DNA damage immune response (DDIR) signature and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs), as prognostic markers in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) in SWOG 9313., Methods: Four hundred twenty-five centrally determined patient cases with TNBC from S9313 were identified. DDIR signature was performed on RNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, and samples were classified as DDIR negative or positive using predefined cutoffs. Evaluation of sTILs was performed as described previously. Markers were tested for prognostic value for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression models adjusted for treatment assignment, nodal status, and tumor size., Results: Among 425 patients with TNBC, 33% were node positive. DDIR was tested successfully in 90% of patients (381 of 425), 62% of which were DDIR signature positive. DDIR signature positivity was associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92; P = .015) and OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.89; P = .010). sTILs density assessment was available in 99% of patients and was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.96; P = .026 for sTILs density ≥ 20% v < 20%) and OS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.85; P = .004 for sTILs density ≥ 20% v < 20%). DDIR signature score and sTILs density were moderately correlated ( r = 0.60), which precluded statistical significance for DFS in a joint model. Three-year DFS and OS in a subgroup of patients with DDIR positivity and T1c/T2N0 disease were 88% and 94%, respectively., Conclusion: The prognostic role of sTILs and DDIR in early-stage TNBC was confirmed. DDIR signature conferred improved prognosis in two thirds of patients with TNBC treated with adjuvant AC. DDIR signature has the potential to stratify outcome and to identify patients with less projected benefit after AC chemotherapy.

Calibration and reproducibility of quantitative 18 F-FDG PET measures are essential for adopting integral 18 F-FDG PET/CT biomarkers and response measures in multicenter clinical trials. We implemented a multicenter qualification process using National Institute of Standards and Technology-traceable reference sources for scanners and dose calibrators, and similar patient and imaging protocols. We then assessed SUV in patient test-retest studies. Methods: Five 18 F-FDG PET/CT scanners from 4 institutions (2 in a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3 in a community-based network) were qualified for study use. Patients were scanned twice within 15 d, on the same scanner ( n = 10); different but same model scanners within an institution ( n = 2); or different model scanners at different institutions ( n = 11). SUV max was recorded for lesions, and SUV mean for normal liver uptake. Linear mixed models with random intercept were fitted to evaluate test-retest differences in multiple lesions per patient and to estimate the concordance correlation coefficient. Bland-Altman plots and repeatability coefficients were also produced. Results: In total, 162 lesions (82 bone, 80 soft tissue) were assessed in patients with breast cancer ( n = 17) or other cancers ( n = 6). Repeat scans within the same institution, using the same scanner or 2 scanners of the same model, had an average difference in SUV max of 8% (95% confidence interval, 6%-10%). For test-retest on different scanners at different sites, the average difference in lesion SUV max was 18% (95% confidence interval, 13%-24%). Normal liver uptake (SUV mean ) showed an average difference of 5% (95% confidence interval, 3%-10%) for the same scanner model or institution and 6% (95% confidence interval, 3%-11%) for different scanners from different institutions. Protocol adherence was good; the median difference in injection-to-acquisition time was 2 min (range, 0-11 min). Test-retest SUV max variability was not explained by available information on protocol deviations or patient or lesion characteristics. Conclusion: 18 F-FDG PET/CT scanner qualification and calibration can yield highly reproducible test-retest tumor SUV measurements. Our data support use of different qualified scanners of the same model for serial studies. Test-retest differences from different scanner models were greater; more resolution-dependent harmonization of scanner protocols and reconstruction algorithms may be capable of reducing these differences to values closer to same-scanner results., (© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Two data points from Table 1. (continued) were published in error. The corrected data in Table 1. (continued) are shown, in italic, below.

Assessing therapy response of breast cancer bone metastases is challenging. In retrospective studies, serial 18 F-FDG PET was predictive of time to skeletal-related events (tSRE) and time to progression (TTP). 18 F-NaF PET improves bone metastasis detection compared with bone scanning. We prospectively tested 18 F-FDG PET and 18 F-NaF PET to predict tSRE, TTP, and overall survival (OS) in patients with bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: Patients with bone-dominant MBC were imaged with 18 F-FDG PET and 18 F-NaF PET before starting new therapy (scan1) and again at a range of times centered around approximately 4 mo later (scan2). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) and lean body mass adjusted standardized uptake (SUL peak ) were recorded for a single index lesion and up to 5 most dominant lesions for each scan. tSRE, TTP, and OS were assessed exclusive of the PET images. Univariate Cox regression was performed to test the association between clinical endpoints and 18 F-FDG PET and 18 F-NaF PET measures. mPERCIST (Modified PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors) were also applied. Survival curves for mPERCIST compared response categories of complete response+partial response+stable disease versus progressive disease for tSRE, TTP, and OS. Results: Twenty-eight patients were evaluated. Higher 18 F-FDG SUL peak at scan2 predicted shorter time to tSRE ( P = <0.001) and TTP ( P = 0.044). Higher 18 F-FDG SUV max at scan2 predicted a shorter time to tSRE ( P = <0.001). A multivariable model using 18 F-FDG SUV max of the index lesion at scan1 plus the difference in SUV max of up to 5 lesions between scans was predictive for tSRE and TTP. Among 24 patients evaluable by 18 F-FDG PET mPERCIST, tSRE and TTP were longer in responders (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) than in nonresponders (progressive disease) ( P = 0.007, 0.028, respectively), with a trend toward improved survival ( P = 0.1). An increase in the uptake between scans of up to 5 lesions by 18 F-NaF PET was associated with longer OS ( P = 0.027). Conclusion: Changes in 18 F-FDG PET parameters during therapy are predictive of tSRE and TTP, but not OS. mPERCIST evaluation in bone lesions may be useful in assessing response to therapy and is worthy of evaluation in multicenter, prospective trials. Serial 18 F-NaF PET was associated with OS but was not useful for predicting TTP or tSRE in bone-dominant MBC., (© 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Modern radiation therapy is delivered with great precision, in part by relying on high-resolution multidimensional anatomic imaging to define targets in space and time. The development of quantitative imaging (QI) modalities capable of monitoring biologic parameters could provide deeper insight into tumor biology and facilitate more personalized clinical decision-making. The Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) was established by the National Cancer Institute to advance and validate these QI modalities in the context of oncology clinical trials. In particular, the QIN has significant interest in the application of QI to widen the therapeutic window of radiation therapy. QI modalities have great promise in radiation oncology and will help address significant clinical needs, including finer prognostication, more specific target delineation, reduction of normal tissue toxicity, identification of radioresistant disease, and clearer interpretation of treatment response. Patient-specific QI is being incorporated into radiation treatment design in ways such as dose escalation and adaptive replanning, with the intent of improving outcomes while lessening treatment morbidities. This review discusses the current vision of the QIN, current areas of investigation, and how the QIN hopes to enhance the integration of QI into the practice of radiation oncology., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Molecular imaging using 16α-[ 18 F]fluoro-17β-estradiol (FES) and 18 F-fluoro-furanyl-norprogesterone PET can assess in vivo function of steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer. These experimental agents have been tested in many single-center clinical trials and show promise to elucidate prognosis and predict endocrine therapy response. The current multicenter trial of FES-PET imaging will help bring this radiotracer closer to clinical use. There is tremendous potential for these tracers to advance drug development, enhance understanding of estrogen receptor-positive tumor biology, and personalize treatment., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-causing alterations have been reported in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that TNBCs with HRD alterations might be more sensitive to anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy and report on HRD status and BRCA1 promoter methylation (PM) as prognostic markers in TNBC patients treated with adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) in SWOG9313., Patients and Methods: In total, 425 TNBC patients were identified from S9313. HRD score, tumor BRCA1/2 sequencing, and BRCA1 PM were carried out on DNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Positive HRD status was defined as either a deleterious tumor BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) mutation or a pre-defined HRD score ≥42. Markers were tested for prognostic value on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression models adjusted for treatment assignment and nodal status., Results: HRD status was determined in 89% (379/425) of cases. Of these, 67% were HRD positive (27% with tBRCA mutation, 40% tBRCA-negative but HRD score ≥42). HRD-positive status was associated with a better DFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.00; P = 0.049] and non-significant trend toward better OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.48-1.03; P = 0.073). High HRD score (≥42) in tBRCA-negative patients (n = 274) was also associated with better DFS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.94; P = 0.023) and OS (HR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.42-1.00; P = 0.049). BRCA1 PM was evaluated successfully in 82% (348/425) and detected in 32% of cases. The DFS HR for BRCA1 PM was similar to that for HRD but did not reach statistical significance (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.54-1.17; P = 0.25)., Conclusions: HRD positivity was observed in two-thirds of TNBC patients receiving adjuvant AC and was associated with better DFS. HRD status may identify TNBC patients who receive greater benefit from AC-based chemotherapy and should be evaluated further in prospective studies., Clinical Trials Number: Int0137 (The trial pre-dates Clinicaltrial.Gov website establishment).

Introduction: Doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide is active in breast cancer; however, its use in metastatic cancer is limited owing to cardiotoxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was formulated to decrease the toxicity of conventional doxorubicin. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of PLD with metronomic oral cyclophosphamide., Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-arm open-label phase I/II study of PLD and oral cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In phase I, 3 escalating doses of PLD were planned (30, 35, and 40 mg/m 2 ) with cyclophosphamide (60 mg/m 2 orally daily) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In phase II, the MTD of PLD in combination of oral cyclophosphamide was used to assess the primary endpoint of overall clinical response rate and secondary endpoints of progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events., Results: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study (n = 6 in phase I and n = 24 in phase II). The MTD of PLD from phase I was 30 mg/m 2 . The median progression-free and overall survival for the entire cohort were 6.4 months (95% confidence interval, 3.9 months to N/A) and 18.7 months (95% confidence interval, 15.1-31.5 months), respectively. A total of 21 (75%) patients had clinical benefit, including 6 (21%) patients with partial response and 15 (54%) patients with stable disease. The majority of toxicities were uncomplicated myelosuppression, and no infection or febrile neutropenia were noted in any patient., Conclusion: PLD in combination with daily oral cyclophosphamide is an active and tolerable regimen in metastatic breast cancer., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We developed a method to evaluate variations in the PET imaging process in order to characterize the relative ability of static and dynamic metrics to measure breast cancer response to therapy in a clinical trial setting. We performed a virtual clinical trial by generating 540 independent and identically distributed PET imaging study realizations for each of 22 original dynamic fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) breast cancer patient studies pre- and post-therapy. Each noise realization accounted for known sources of uncertainty in the imaging process, such as biological variability and SUV uptake time. Four definitions of SUV were analyzed, which were SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and SUV50%. We performed a ROC analysis on the resulting SUV and kinetic parameter uncertainty distributions to assess the impact of the variability on the measurement capabilities of each metric. The kinetic macro parameter, K i , showed more variability than SUV (mean CV K i   =  17%, SUV  =  13%), but K i pre- and post-therapy distributions also showed increased separation compared to the SUV pre- and post-therapy distributions (mean normalized difference K i   =  0.54, SUV  =  0.27). For the patients who did not show perfect separation between the pre- and post-therapy parameter uncertainty distributions (ROC AUC  <  1), dynamic imaging outperformed SUV in distinguishing metabolic change in response to therapy, ranging from 12 to 14 of 16 patients over all SUV definitions and uptake time scenarios (p  <  0.05). For the patient cohort in this study, which is comprised of non-high-grade ER+  tumors, K i outperformed SUV in an ROC analysis of the parameter uncertainty distributions pre- and post-therapy. This methodology can be applied to different scenarios with the ability to inform the design of clinical trials using PET imaging.

Estrogen receptor α (ERα) is a critical prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancer. ERα expression is used to determine whether patients should be treated with endocrine therapy, which is designed to block ERα signaling. Endocrine therapy given for 5-10 y after surgery improves progression-free and overall survival for patients with ER-positive primary breast cancer. However, disease recurrence and development of metastatic disease can occur despite appropriate treatment with endocrine therapy. Thus, a functional test performed at the time of initial diagnosis that can identify which patients would do well with endocrine therapy alone versus those who require adjuvant chemotherapy would be impactful for improving patient outcomes., (© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) bring relief of pain and functional disability to patients with end-stage osteoarthritis, and however, the literature on their impact on patients' level of physical activity (PA) is scarce. Cross-sectional study in patients who underwent THA/TKA surgery in the preceding 6-22 months and a random sample of persons aged >40 years from the Dutch general population, participating in a national survey. PA in minutes per week (min/week) and adherence to the Dutch recommendation for PA (NNGB yes/no) were measured by the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing PA. Multivariable linear (total min/week) and logistic regression analyses (meeting recommendations PA), adjusting for confounders, were performed for THA and TKA separately. In total, 258 THA [62.3% female, aged 69.4 (9.1)] and 221 TKA [65.7% female, aged 69.5 (8.9)] patients and 4373 persons from the Dutch general population [51.4% female, aged 58.9 (11.6)] were included. The presence of THA was associated after adjusting for age, sex, BMI education and musculoskeletal comorbidities, with more total min/week spent on PA (THA 13.8% increase, 95% CI 1.6-27.6%), whilst both TJA groups were associated with adhering to NNGB (THA: OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.26-2.56; TKA: OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.20-2.51). As this study used questionnaires to compare the PA of THA/TKA patients to the general population, some recall and selection bias might have been induced. After surgery, overall, TJA patients are more likely to adhere NNGB than a representative sample of persons >40 years from the Dutch general population., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest by any of the authors.