Search

Anaerobic digestion is a well-established microbial-based technology for the treatment of organic waste streams and subsequent biogas recovery. A robust and versatile microbial community to ensure overall stability of the process is essential. Four full-scale anaerobic digestion plants were followed for one year to link operational characteristics with microbial community composition and structure. Similarities between digesters, community dynamics and co-occurrence between bacteria and archaea within each digester were analysed. Free ammonia concentration (>200 mg N L-1) and conductivity (>30 mS cm-1) hindered acetoclastic methanogenesis by Methanosaetaceae. Thus, methanogenesis was pushed to the hydrogenotrophic pathway carried out by Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales. Firmicutes dominated the overall bacterial community in each of the digesters (>50%), however, principal coordinate analysis of Bray-Curtis indices showed that each of the four digesters hosted a unique microbial community. The uniqueness of this community was related to two phylotypes belonging to the Syntrophomonas genus (Phy32 and Phy34) and to one unclassified bacterium (Phy2), which could both be considered marker populations in the community. A clear differentiation in co-occurrence of methanogens with several bacteria was observed between the different digesters. Our results demonstrated that full-scale anaerobic digestion plants show constant dynamics and co-occurrence patterns in function of time, but are unique in terms of composition, related to the presence of marker populations.

Obtaining a reliable estimation of the methane potential of organic waste streams in anaerobic digestion, for which a biochemical methane potential (BMP) test is often used, is of high importance. Standardization of this BMP test is required to ensure inter-laboratory repeatability and accuracy of the BMP results. Therefore, guidelines were set out; yet, these do not provide sufficient information concerning origin of and the microbial community in the test inoculum. Here, the specific contribution of the methanogenic community on the BMP test results was evaluated. The biomethane potential of four different substrates (molasses, bio-refinery waste, liquid manure and high-rate activated sludge) was determined by means of four different inocula from full-scale anaerobic digestion plants. A significant effect of the selected inoculum on the BMP result was observed for two out of four substrates. This inoculum effect could be attributed to the abundance of methanogens and a potential inhibiting effect in the inoculum itself, demonstrating the importance of inoculum selection for BMP testing. We recommend the application of granular sludge as an inoculum, because of its higher methanogenic abundance and activity, and protection from bulk solutions, compared with other inocula.