Search

Introduction: Locoregional recurrence (LR) is common in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNSCC), posing challenges for treatment. We analysed outcome parameters and toxicities for patients being treated with radiotherapy (RT) for LR-HNSCC and investigated patient and disease related prognostic factors in this prognostically unfavourable group. Methods: This analysis includes 101 LR-HNSCC patients treated with RT, radio-chemotherapy (RCT) or radio-immunotherapy (RIT) between 2010 and 2018 at a high-volume tertiary centre. Patient characteristics, tumour and treatment details were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 were assessed. Results: 62% of patients were radiotherapy-naïve (initial RT group) while 38% were re-irradiated at site of LR (re-RT group). Median OS for initial RT was 24 months, for re-RT 12 months (p < 0.01). In the RCT subgroup, patients with initial RT had significantly longer OS with 35 months compared to re-RT 12 months (p < 0.05). Patients with UICC grade IV tumours and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube had significantly shorter OS in multivariate analysis: initial RT 13 vs. re-RT 32 months and initial RT 12 vs. re-RT 32 months respectively. Salvage surgery before RT at recurrence was a positive prognostic factor for OS (initial RT 35 vs. re-RT 12 months). Other significant factors for longer OS in univariate analysis included low inflammatory status (Glasgow Prognostic Score 0) and radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy. We detected 37 (15%) ≥ CTCAE Grade 3 events for initial RT and 19 (15%) for re-RT patients. Conclusion: In this analysis, we identified key prognostic factors including PEG tube and inflammation status that could guide treatment decision. Our findings suggest salvage surgery as preferred treatment option with postoperative RT at LR. Adverse events due to re-RT were acceptable. A radiation dose of ≥ 50 Gy should be administered to achieve better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with over 1.6 million new cases and 1.2 million deaths each year. There is insufficient data on management of elderly and frail EC patients. It is important to explore how elderly EC patients benefit from definite and neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimens. The choice of a schedule and the chemotherapy components in regard of age, comorbidities and several influencing risk factors remains challenging. In our retrospective analysis, combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel shows the benefits of preventing progressive disease and prolonging survival without increasing adverse reactions. Furthermore, trimodal treatment seems to be feasible and effective in the group of the elderly. We discuss current knowledge and the results of studies on the role of chemoradiation in frail elderly EC patients. Elderly patients > 70 years of age with esophageal cancer (EC) represent a challenging group as frailty and comorbidities need to be considered. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with regard to basic geriatric screening in elderly patients in order to elucidate prognostic factors. Thirty-four elderly patients > 70 years with EC treated at our cancer center between May 2014 and October 2018 fulfilled the selection criteria for this retrospective analysis. Treatment consisted of intravenous infusion of carboplatin/paclitaxel or fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin with the intention of neoadjuvant or definite chemoradiation. Clinicopathological data including performance status (ECOG), (age-adjusted) Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Frailty-scale by Fried, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form, body mass index, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, and treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE) were assessed. Data were analyzed as predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). All patients (ten female, 24 male) received combined CRT (22 patients in neoadjuvant, 12 patients in definite intent). Median age was 75 years and the ECOG index between 0 and 1 (52.9% vs. 35.3%); four patients were rated as ECOG 3 (11.8%). Median follow-up was 24 months. Tumors were mainly located in the lower esophagus or esophagogastric-junction with an T3 stage (n = 25; 75.8%) and N1 stage (n = 28; 90.3%). 15 patients (44.1%) had SCC, 19 patients (55.9%) AC. 26 of the patients (76.5%) were scored as prefrail and 50% were in risk for malnutrition (n = 17). In relation to the BMI, ten patients (29.4%) were ranked as overweight, and 15 patients were presented in a healthy state of weight (44.1%). Grade 3 acute toxicity (or higher) occured in nine cases (26.5%). Most of the patients did not show any late toxicities (66.7%). Trimodal therapy provides a significant prolonged OS (p = 0.049) regardless of age, but without impact on PFS. Our analysis suggests that chemoradiation therapy is feasible for elderly patients (>70 years) with tolerable toxicity. Trimodal therapy of EC shows a positive effect on OS and PFS. Further studies are needed to elucidate benefitting subgroups within the elderly. In addition to age, treatment decisions should be based on performance status, nutritional condition and multidisciplinary validated geriatric screening tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In head and neck cancers (HNCs), fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging is feasible with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) imaging using [68 Ga]-radiolabeled inhibitors of FAP ([68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46) in HNCs. This study aims to compare [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose ([18F]F-FDG) PET/CT with a focus on improved target volume definition and radiotherapy planning in patients with HNC referred for chemoradiation.Methods: A total of 15 patients with HNCs received both [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT with a thermoplastic mask, in addition to initial tumor staging by conventional imaging with contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Mean intervals between FAPI/FDG and FAPI/conventional imaging were 4 ± 20 and 17 ± 18 days, respectively. Location and number of suspicious lesions revealed by the different procedures were recorded. Subsequently, expert-generated gross tumor volumes (GTVs) based on conventional imaging were compared to those based on [18F]F-FDG and [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT to measure the impact on subsequent radiation planning.Results: All patients had focal FAPI uptake above background in tumor lesions. Compared to FDG, tumor uptake (median SUVmax 10.2 vs. 7.3, p = 0.008) and tumor-to-background ratios were significantly higher with FAPI than with FDG (SUVmean liver: 9.3 vs. 3.2, p < 0.001; SUVmean bloodpool: 6.9 vs. 4.0, p < 0.001). A total of 49 lesions were recorded. Of these, 40 (82%) were FDG+ and 41 (84%) were FAP+. There were 5 (10%) FAP+/FDG- lesions and 4 (8%) FAP-/FDG+ lesions. Volumetrically, a significant difference was found between the GTVs (median 57.9 ml in the FAPI-GTV, 42.5 ml in the FDG-GTV, compared to 39.2 ml in the conventional-GTV). Disease stage identified by FAPI PET/CT was mostly concordant with FDG PET/CT. Compared to conventional imaging, five patients (33%) were upstaged following imaging with FAPI and FDG PET/CT.Conclusion: We demonstrate that [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 -PET/CT is useful for detecting tumor lesions in patients with HNCs. There is now a need for prospective randomized studies to confirm the role of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in relation to [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in HNCs and to evaluate its impact on clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combined modality treatment with chemotherapy followed by consolidation radiation therapy (RT) provides excellent outcomes for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The international standard of care for consolidation RT, involved-site/involved-node radiation therapy (ISRT/INRT), has never been evaluated in a randomized phase 3 trial against the former standard involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT). In the multicenter phase 3 GHSG (German Hodgkin Study Group) HD17 trial, patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized between the standard Combined modality treatment group and a positron-emission tomography (PET)-guided group. In the standard group, patients received 2 cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) and 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by 30 Gy IFRT. In the experimental group, patients received no further therapy if postchemotherapy PET was negative and 30 Gy GHSG INRT, comparable to and therefore termed here ISRT, if PET was positive. Here, we analyze the interim PET-positive patients in a post hoc analysis, and therefore the randomized comparison of IFRT versus INRT/ISRT. A total of 1100 patients were randomized, of which 311 had a positive PET after chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 4-year progression-free survival were 96.8% (95% CI, 91.6%-98.8%) in the IFRT group and 95.4% (95% CI, 89.9%-97.9%; HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.44-4.42) in the ISRT group. The pattern of recurrence analyses indicated that none of the cases of disease progression or recurrence in the ISRT group would have been prevented by the use of IFRT. Acute grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 8.5% of IFRT patients and 2.6% of ISRT patients (P =.03). For the first time, consolidation INRT/ISRT was randomly compared with IFRT in a phase 3 trial. Regarding progression-free survival, no advantage of IFRT could be demonstrated. In summary, our data confirm the status of INRT/ISRT as the current standard of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The landscape of radiation oncology has evolved rapidly in recent years, driven by advancements in technology and increasing demands for quality control and patient care. To meet these challenges, structured and effective teaching methods are essential during residency training. Various organizations, such as ESTRO and DEGRO-Academy, have proposed curricula to standardize radiation oncology training. To address this issue and make it accessible to a broad audience, we established an online-based webinar series supervised by the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and the young DEGRO (yDEGRO) working group of the DEGRO. Starting in January 2021, selected lecturers taught curricular content monthly as preparation for the board exam in radiation oncology. Between 01/2021 and 12/2022 we evaluated 24 courses using a standardized questionnaire with 21 items (recording epidemiological characteristics of the participants, didactic and content quality). A Likert scale (range: 1-4) was used in combination with binary and open questions. A total of 4200 participants enrolled in the educational courses. Out of these, 934 individuals filled out the feedback form (response rate: 22.2%). 36% of all participants were residents in radiation oncology, 35% specialists, 21% medical technologists for radiology (MTR) and 8% were medical physics experts (MPE)). Overall, participants rated the lectures as excellent (mean rating 2021: 1.33 versus 2022: 1.25) and the curriculum surpassed the offered at each training site for 70% of participants. Case-based learning emerged as a highly favored approach. Digital teaching and learning have revolutionized education, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to the adoption of innovative teaching methods in radiation oncology, including e-learning and telehealth. These digital formats offer flexibility and effectiveness in knowledge transfer, with the potential to enhance clinical care quality. Through participant evaluations and curriculum coverage analysis, we assess the webinar's impact on trainee physicians in Germany and beyond. Results indicate high participant satisfaction, with positive feedback on course content and didactic quality. The webinars cover a wide range of the curriculum for the German board exam in radiation oncology, demonstrating their potential to supplement traditional training methods. Feedback highlights areas for improvement, such as increased focus on practical relevance and interdisciplinary topics. Overall, the DEGRO webinar represents a valuable addition to radiation oncology education, offering standardized, high-quality teaching accessible to a diverse audience of physician, radiation biologists, medical technologists for radiology and medical physics experts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]