Search

Objectives: The safety of generic substitution of antiseizure drugs (ASDs) has been questioned for many years. This study aimed to identify physicians' attitudes to the generic substitution of ASDs in epilepsy and which factors were of significance when deciding on compound substitutions., Material and Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was sent to neurologists and neurology residents in public health care and at private practices in two Swedish regions between February and March 2020. The 30-item survey covered drug- and patient-related factors, as well as considerations relating to practical, cost-related, and pharmacokinetic issues., Results: The total response rate was 55.8%. Respondents were generally positive to cutting costs through generic ASD utilization (74%) and prescribing generic compounds when starting a new ASD treatment (84.9%). The most substantial concern was a deterioration in seizure control (17.1%). Physicians refrained from switching if the patient wished to remain on the original compound (76.1%), had a cognitive impairment (52.5%), was on a drug with a narrow therapeutic index (47%), or had shown prior susceptibility to adverse effects (45.6%). Opinions on substitution decisions differed significantly between the Stockholm and Skåne regions. Less than one-third of the respondents were aware of supporting guidelines., Conclusions: Neurologists generally accept the use of generic antiseizure compounds. Patient preference to remain on brand-name drug treatment was the most important factor that led to avoiding a switch. Our results may constitute material for consensus discussions to decide on quality indicators of interest for future research on substitution outcomes., (© 2021 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

To explore possible concentration-effect relationships, gabapentin (GBP) and vigabatrin (VGB) serum concentrations were obtained from patients participating in an add-on dose-titration trial comparing GBP and VGB in partial epilepsy. Patients randomized to GBP started on 1800 mg/d and could have their dosage increased stepwise to 2400 and 3600 mg/d if seizures persisted. Those randomised to VGB started on 1000 mg/d, and the dose could be increased to 2000 and 4000 mg/d. Blood samples were obtained at steady state, at a nonstandardized time, from 27 patients randomized to GBP and from 36 randomized to VGB. Serum samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. The treatment effect was expressed as percentage reduction in number of seizures from baseline. In addition, patients were classified as responders (>50% reduction in number of seizures from baseline) or nonresponders. There was no significant correlation between serum concentrations of GBP and seizure reduction at the lowest dosage, 1800 mg/d (r = -0.02, P = 0.94, Spearman-rank), nor between VGB serum levels and seizure reduction at 1000 mg/d of VGB (r = -0.14, P = 0.44). The serum GBP concentrations among responders to GBP 1800 mg/d were 26 +/- 12 micro mol/L (mean +/- SD), which was not different from serum concentrations in nonresponders, 28+/-13 micro mol/L. Nor was there a difference between serum concentrations of responders and nonresponders to VGB 1000 mg/d (32 +/- 23 and 44 +/- 36 micro mol/L, respectively). Hence, with the present study design we were unable to identify specific target ranges of GBP and VGB serum concentrations.

The aim of the current study was to characterize the observed discrepancy between unbound plasma valproate (VPA) in single dose and steady state in humans. Unbound and total plasma VPA and subcutaneous microdialysate VPA concentrations were estimated in single dose (6 subjects, n = 33) and steady state (11 subjects, n = 110). Trough plasma samples from 14 patients with total VPA concentrations of 300 micromol/L and 14 patients with VPA concentrations ranging from 600 to 700 micromol/L were analyzed for the unbound VPA fraction and compared with the unbound VPA fraction in spiked plasma samples from healthy subjects containing similar total VPA concentrations. The unbound plasma VPA fraction was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the steady-state group compared with the single-dose group. The unbound VPA fraction was significantly higher in steady state compared with spiked plasma samples at high and low total VPA concentrations (P < 0.001). The difference between microdialysate and unbound plasma VPA concentrations was significant in the steady-state group (P < 0.001), while no difference was observed in the single-dose group. The mean (+/- SD) subcutaneous microdialysate-to-unbound plasma ratio in the single-dose and steady-state groups was 1.08 (+/- 0.401) and 0.74 (+/- 0.123), respectively. The ratio difference between the groups was significant (P < 0.001). The results of the current study show that unbound plasma fractions of VPA are consistently higher in steady state compared with single dose. Together with the finding of higher unbound VPA fraction in steady state compared with spiked plasma samples, these results provide indirect evidence of displacement of VPA from plasma proteins by product(s) of VPA biotransformation. In addition, subcutaneous microdialysate VPA levels were consistently lower than unbound plasma levels in steady state but not after single dose. The mechanisms underlying this observation need to be studied further.

The purpose of the study was to determine if binding of the drugs to the sampling equipment during microdialysis would influence the results for carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbital. In vitro experiments with microdialysis catheters and separate parts of catheters were performed to estimate the degree of drug binding to the dialysis equipment. A mathematical model to calculate drug binding and recovery is proposed. In vivo protein unbound carbamazepine concentrations in subcutaneous extracellular fluid at different flow rates (6 patients), unbound carbamazepine (1 patient) and unbound phenobarbital (I patient) in subdural cerebrospinal fluid and subcutaneous extracellular fluid were estimated and the in vivo data were compared to the in vitro results and data generated by the mathematical model. Binding to the soft outlet polyurethane tubing was extensive and variable for phenytoin, which precluded in vivo testing, but limited and more predictable for carbamazepine and phenobarbital. None of the three compounds bound to the hard internaltubing. Phenytoin and phenobarbital did not bind to the dialysis membrane, while a small degree of binding may be present for carbamazepine. In vivo estimates of carbamazepine protein unbound subcutaneous extracellular concentrations by microdialysis, adjusted for binding to the plastic tubing, were 81% of protein unbound plasma concentrations. In single case studies, subdural cerebrospinal fluid and subcutaneous extracellular levels of carbamazepine and phenobarbital were similar and when corrected for binding to the plastic tubings they were also close to protein unbound plasma concentrations. Microdialysis can be used for reliable estimations of protein unbound carbamazepine and possibly phenobarbital concentrations when drug binding to the plastic tubing is considered. Reliable estimation of unbound phenytoin is not possible at present.

We sought to study the time course of the distribution of valproate (VPA) to subdural cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in relation to subcutaneous extracellular fluid (ECF) and plasma after a single oral dose and to study the distribution to these three compartments under steady-state conditions. Microdialysis was used to estimate unbound VPA concentrations in subdural CSF and subcutaneous ECF, and blood samples were drawn for estimation of total and unbound VPA plasma concentrations in four patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation with subdural EEG monitoring. Three patients were given a single oral dose of VPA, and one patient was receiving regular VPA treatment. VPA was analyzed by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. The distribution of VPA to subdural CSF was rapid (Tmax, 3.5 h in two patients and 5.5 h in one patient) and subject to a minor delay in all three patients compared with that in the subcutaneous tissue ECF (Tmax, 2.5 h in all three patients), which in turn exhibited no evidence of a distribution delay compared with plasma. Subdural CSF levels of VPA were slightly lower than subcutaneous ECF levels (mean ratio, 0.78) and unbound plasma levels (mean ratio, 0.91). VPA rapidly enters the subdural CSF in unbound concentrations marginally lower than those obtained in subcutaneous ECF and plasma. These findings provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for acute administration of VPA. The good correlation between VPA concentrations in subcutaneous ECF and subdural CSF indicates that estimation of unbound VPA concentrations in subcutaneous tissue using microdialysis sampling has the potential to be useful for monitoring purposes.

Purpose: Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of gabapentin and vigabatrin as first-line add-on treatment in patients with partial epilepsy., Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized dose titration study. After baseline assessment and randomization, the dose could be increased if seizures persisted and reduced if side effects occurred. Health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. By a protocol amendment post hoc, all randomized patients were offered a standardized perimetry examination at the end of the study. Improvement rate was the proportion of patients with a reduction of seizure frequency of at least 50% during an 8-week period without any adverse events causing withdrawal., Results: One hundred two patients were randomized and analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. The improvement rate was 48% in the gabapentin group and 56% in the vigabatrin group. The improvement rate, when per protocol criteria were fulfilled, was 57% in the gabapentin group and 59% in the vigabatrin group. The proportion of seizure-free patients was 31% in the gabapentin group and 39% in the vigabatrin group. There was no difference in quality-of-life scores between the groups. Perimetry after termination of the study on 64 patients showed abnormal results in 3 of 32 patients in the vigabatrin group., Conclusion: Approximately one third of the patients in both groups became seizure-free. Although no major differences were seen in terms of the improvement rate between the groups, equivalence between the two drugs was not found.

Purpose: To estimate topiramate (TPM) concentrations in subdural cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), subcutaneous extracellular fluid (ECF), and plasma and to study the correlation of TPM concentrations in these three different compartments., Methods: In this single case study of a patient with drug-resistant partial epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation with subdural EEG monitoring, we used microdialysis to estimate concentrations of unbound TPM in CSF of the subdural space and ECF of abdominal subcutaneous tissue. Blood samples were drawn for estimation of TPM concentrations in plasma., Results: The correlation between unbound TPM concentrations in subdural CSF and abdominal subcutaneous ECF was good. The mean ratio of ECF/CSF TPM concentration was 0.93 (SD+/-0.03) and the correlation coefficient was 0.98. The mean ratio of ECF/total plasma TPM was 0.75 (SD+/-0.06), and the correlation coefficient was 0.99. The mean ratio of CSF/total plasma TPM was 0.81 (SD+/-0.06), and the correlation coefficient was 0.97., Conclusions: Assuming a protein binding of TPM of approximately 13%. it is concluded that, based on nine microdialysis samples from a single subject, TPM levels in the CSF at the cortical surface are approximately the same as the unbound plasma levels. Additional patients should be studied to confirm the results.

This article is the second in a series of studies aimed at monitoring valproic acid pharmacokinetics in patients with epilepsy by subcutaneous microdialysis. In the current study, a detailed investigation on healthy volunteers is made of the relationship between total concentrations in plasma, free concentrations in plasma, and dialysate concentrations. Particular emphasis is put on validating that the in vivo recovery under standard conditions (30 mm dialyzing membrane and 0.5 microl/minute perfusion rate) is sufficiently close to 100%. It was found that the recovery was very close to 100% at 0.5 microl/minute and by in vitro studies it could be excluded that valproic acid binds to the dialysis equipment. The correlation between unbound plasma concentrations and microdialysis concentrations of valproic acid was acceptable (r = 0.80), and they did not differ systematically from one another. It is concluded that microdialysis can be used to sample subcutaneous extracellular valproic acid in a clinical setting giving reliable estimates of the unbound concentration in plasma.

Standardised skin biopsies followed by immunohistochemical examination for the presence of terminal nerve fibres reacting for neuropeptides substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) were evaluated. Healthy subjects regularly displayed free nerve endings of both fibre types in the papillary and reticular dermis. Both fibre types were present close to blood vessels, while CGRP immunoreactive fibres were more often encountered near sweat gland acini compared to SP fibres. Diabetes mellitus complicated by polyneuropathy was accompanied by marked reduction of SP and CGRP reactive fibres in the dermis layers. Five type I diabetes patients without clinical or neurophysiological evidence of polyneuropathy also had reduced density of both fibre types, being significant for CGRP fibres when compared with controls. Skin biopsy with immunohistochemical staining for neuropeptides may represent a sensitive tool in evaluation of patients with peripheral neuropathies.