Search

Trauma is highly prevalent, and women are twice as likely as men to develop posttraumatic stress disorder following a traumatic exposure. Consequently, many women entering the perinatal period have trauma histories. In the perinatal period, a trauma history can negatively impact treatment engagement and adversely affect the experience of pregnancy, postpartum, and parenting. A trauma-informed care approach can mitigate these effects.This review aims to summarize literature that can aid psychiatrists in (1) identifying signs and symptoms of trauma in perinatal women, (2) integrating elements of trauma-informed care into perinatal mental health care, and (3) offering interventions that can minimize adverse outcomes for perinatal women and their children.A PubMed search was conducted with keywords including trauma, pregnancy, perinatal, posttraumatic stress disorder, postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder, and trauma informed care.Perinatal care, given its somewhat invasive nature, has the potential to traumatize or cause retraumatization. Trauma-related disorders are common and can present or worsen in the perinatal period. Trauma can manifest in multiple forms in this population, including exacerbation of preexisting posttraumatic stress disorder, new onset acute stress disorder in the perinatal period, or postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder secondary to traumatic childbirth. Unaddressed trauma can adversely affect the experience of pregnancy, postpartum, and parenting. Psychiatrists caring for women in the perinatal period are in an ideal position to screen for trauma and offer appropriate intervention. A trauma-informed approach to obstetric care can help clinical teams respond to the unique trauma-related challenges that can arise during obstetric care. Trauma-informed care, with its emphasis on establishing a culture of safety, transparency, trustworthiness, collaboration, and mutuality, can empower health care providers and systems with powerful tools to respond to trauma and its myriad effects in a strengths-based manner. By applying a trauma-informed lens, psychiatrists can help their obstetric colleagues provide patient-centered compassionate care and treatment.Applying a trauma-informed approach to evaluation and treatment of perinatal populations could decrease the toll trauma has on affected women and their children.

Trauma is common among those seeking Ob-Gyn care and may have pervasive impact on obstetrical and gynecological health, social functioning, and healthcare engagement. While guidelines exist on the detection and treatment of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders within Ob-Gyn care, the role of Ob-gyn clinicians in identifying and addressing patients' traumatic experiences and related symptoms is less clearly delineated. This manuscript provides an overview of trauma-related symptoms in the context of Ob-Gyn care and practical guidance of clinicians aiming to improve their detection and response to trauma in their clinical practice.Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) describes a psychiatric illness which develops as a response to a traumatic event. Women who have experienced trauma are also at increased risk for borderline personality disorder and other psychiatric comorbidities. Postpartum PTSD has particular relevance to obstetrical care.Screening for trauma in Ob-Gyn care can provide an opportunity to address risk and offer targeted intervention. Several brief evidence-based screening tools are available. Individuals who screen positive require assessment of immediate safety and targeted referrals. Trauma informed care describes an approach to healthcare aimed to enhance physical and emotional safety for patients and clinicians.Given the prevalence and the potentially devastating and enduring impact of trauma and trauma-related symptoms, there is a critical need to address trauma within Ob-Gyn care. By recognizing the signs of trauma and initiating or referring to appropriate treatments, Ob-Gyn clinicians have a unique opportunity to better understand their patients and to improve their care.

Each year in the United States, approximately half a million reproductive-aged women are afflicted with major depression. Pregnant and postpartum women can be reluctant to openly disclose their suffering related to depression and other stigmatizing illnesses (eg, mood and anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and substance use disorders) and subsequently remain symptomatic with no relief. Maternal mortality related to these conditions is significant, with maternal suicide and overdose-related death peaking between 7 and 12 months postpartum. Geographic challenges in accessing perinatal mental health experts can be overcome through the use of telepsychiatry services using a secure video platform (telemedicine).

The treatment of severe mental illness has undergone a paradigm shift over the last 50 years, away from a primary emphasis on hospital-based care and toward community-based care. Some of the forces driving this deinstitutionalization have been scientific and patient-centered, such as better differentiation between acute and subacute risk, innovations in outpatient and crisis care (assertive community treatment programs, dialectical behavioral therapy, treatment-oriented psychiatric emergency services), gradually improving psychopharmacology, and an increased appreciation of the negative effect of coercive hospitalization, except when risk is very high. On the other hand, some of the forces have been less focused on patient needs: budget-driven cuts in public hospital beds divorced from population-based need; managed care’s profit-driven impact on private psychiatric hospitals and outpatient services; and purported patient-centered approaches promoting non-hospital care that may under-recognize that some extremely ill patients need years of painstaking effort to make a community transition. The result has been a reconfiguration of the country’s mental health system that, at times, leaves large numbers of people without adequate mental health and substance abuse services. Often their only option is to seek care in medical emergency departments (ED) that have not been designed for the needs of mentally ill patients. Increasingly, many of those individuals end up waiting in EDs for appropriate care and disposition for hours or days. This overflow phenomenon has become so prevalent that it has been given a name: “boarding.” This practice is almost certainly detrimental to patients and staff, and it has spawned efforts on multiple fronts to understand and resolve it. When considering solutions, both ED-focused and systemwide considerations must be explored. This resource document provides an overview and recommendations regarding this complex topic.

Background In 2008 The Joint Commission issued a Sentinel Event Alert that further defined “behaviors that undermine a culture of safety,” stating that “intimidating and disruptive behaviors” can result in medical errors that affect patient care and safety. The American College of Physician Executives found that more than 95% of respondents encountered “disturbing . . . and potentially dangerous” behaviors on a regular basis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a professional development program on unprofessional physician behaviors using the B29™, a reliable and valid tool to assess workplace behaviors. Methods A pre-post study design was used to measure changes in physicians’ unprofessional behaviors using the B29, a 35-item, Web-based survey. The survey is completed as a 360° assessment by peers, colleagues, administrators, and staff, and the physician completes a self-assessment. In most cases, the survey is voluntary. Those who completed both a precourse and a postcourse survey made up a convenience sample or subset of the larger number of physicians who completed the course. Results Twenty-four of 28 physicians in the study experienced an improvement in professional behavior, demonstrated as a decrease in the number of lowest-rated items. The mean decrease for all 28 physicians was 51.1%. Lowest-rated items improved an average of 53.5% overall. T-scores increased (also improved) for 24 of 28 physicians over the six-month period. Conclusion Unprofessional behavior by physicians, as observed and reported by their peers and colleagues, can be positively modified by a relatively brief education program focused on teaching professionalism.

Background Women of reproductive potential with substance use disorders, especially those who are pregnant, present many clinical challenges to healthcare providers, including comorbid psychiatric disorders, a history of trauma and abuse, avoidance of or poor access to prenatal care, fear of legal consequences, and countertransference reactions. Methods In November 2013, members of the Women's Mental Health Special Interest Group of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine presented a Workshop reviewing substance abuse in pregnancy, highlighting the specific contributions that psychosomatic medicine specialists can make in the care of these patients. The discussion focused on epidemiology; maternal and fetal risks; and screening and treatment considerations for tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, opioids, benzodiazepines, stimulants, and several other substances. Objective Our purpose in publishing this review is to provide clinicians and educators with the most up-to-date summary in this field to better engage these patients in care and break the intergenerational cycle of abuse and addiction.

Resilience and wellness are more than an absence of distress or disease. In the population at large, a relatively small subset of people achieves a full and happy life and is flourishing. The same applies to physician well-being and resilience. There is growing awareness that more must be done to promote physician resilience, increase satisfaction within the profession, and prevent burnout. Both individual and organizational efforts serve complementary and synergistic roles. There is no “one size fits all” tactic for encouraging self-care, wellness, and resilience, but the different pressures at each stage of the physician life span can inform individual and organizational approaches. Attending to personal self-care with good nutrition, adequate sleep, and regular exercise promotes well-being, as does the practice of cognitive-, behavioral-, and mindfulness-based strategies for stress reduction, empowerment, and happiness. Being able to focus on the aspects of work that are most meaningful appears to protect against burnout, as does having control over the practice environment. Authentic social connections at home and at work foster resilience. Good role models and mentors enhance career satisfaction. In order for physicians to overcome stigma and seek help when appropriate, changing cultural norms and increasing organizational support are critical. Physicians indoctrinated within a culture that boasts of superhuman stamina understandably have underdeveloped skill sets for self-care and for achieving a meaningful work-life balance. To achieve what they have, ongoing significant sacrifice becomes engrained as a way of life contributing to high rates of burnout and distress. This chapter provides a glimpse into the real-life struggles throughout the life cycle of a physician ranging from the premedical years to the preretirement years and offers pertinent evidence-based solutions and remedies.

The author identifies and seeks to remove barriers contributing to physician/medical students' decisions NOT to seek mental health care.Following a cluster of medical student and physician suicides in one medical community, medical trainees anonymously shared their views regarding seeking mental health treatment in light of the current disclosure requirements for medical licensure. In an effort to identify medical licensure questions that more accurately assess for potential impairment--replacing the stigmatizing global inquiry about past mental health treatment--47 states' medical licensure questions available on the web were examined. Representatives from the state's psychiatric and medical societies joined efforts to formally request the State Medical Board to revise the licensure questions.The State Medical Board unanimously approved the recommended changes.Overcoming stigma within the medical profession regarding seeking psychiatric care is a difficult process requiring ongoing education of our colleagues. Physicians must have the opportunity to seek confidential mental health treatment at their earliest signs of distress in order to maximize their optimal functioning in an effort to prevent impairment.

The authors describe the complexity of social processes for implementing technological change. Once a new technology is available, information about its availability and benefits must be made available to the community of users, with opportunities to try the innovations and find them worthwhile, despite organizational resistances.The authors reviewed the literature from psychiatry, psychology, sociology, business, and technology to distill common denominators for success and failure related to implementing technology.Beneficial technological innovations that are simple to use and obviously save everyone time and effort are easy to inaugurate. However, innovations that primarily serve management rather than subordinates or front-line utilizers may fail, despite considerable institutional effort. This article reviews and outlines several of the more prominent theoretical models governing successful institutional change.Successful implementation of difficult technological changes requires visionary leadership that has carefully considered the benefits, consulted with influence leaders at all organizational levels to spot unintended consequences and sources of resistance, and developed a detailed plan and continuous quality assurance process to foster implementation over time.

The authors conducted a national survey of 355 general medical/surgical hospitals to assess constant observation (CO) practices. The authors assessed overall use, expense, staffing patterns, funding strategies, and cost-saving interventions. Virtually all responding hospitals (N = 102) reported using some form of CO. Several hospitals reported significant decreases in CO expenditures after the implementation of cost-saving interventions (the largest annual decrease reported was $340,000). Cost-saving interventions included utilizing consolidated bed spaces, relocating patients near nursing stations, placing at-risk patients in bed enclosure devices, and regularly assisting patients to the toilet. In addition, less costly personnel were hired, and volunteers and/or patient family members provided CO (or were required to assist with the cost of CO). Finally, hospital staff were educated about the costs and the appropriate use of CO. They were also taught to recognize and effectively treat delirium.

A psychiatric consultation report form was developed to efficiently and accurately meet the stringent Medicare documentation guidelines that go into effect July 8, 1998. This form was designed for use in academic institutions where the consultation team includes teaching physicians, psychiatric residents, and medical students. Medicare has strict requirements regarding who may document each element of the consultation for billing purposes. These requirements were taken into account in the design of this form. Two academic consultation-liaison psychiatric services piloted the form and conducted internal audits to evaluate its usefulness. The accuracy of billing improved twofold at one site because the form facilitated rapid completion of details requisite to justify CPT codes of complex assessments. This saved considerable time and effort over the previous methods used to determine an appropriate level of billing. Critical information was documented more frequently, thereby meeting the documentation requirements more consistently. Instructions for use, criticisms, and cautions are given.

A multisite field trial was conducted at 11 institutions to test the clinical reliability of a 29-item consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry assessment instrument. Twenty-five raters viewed videotapes of two "trainees" conducting clinical interviews with a simulated patient. One trainee was a medical student, the other was a fellow in psychiatry. Raters completed the 29-item assessment instrument for each trainee. The mean value scores reflected the skill of each trainee. The medical student had a mean score of 1.93, whereas the C-L fellow had a mean score of 3.13 which parallels the expected level of skill for the two interviewers. Eighty-six percent of the items (25/29) had a standard deviation (SD) of less than 1.0. Each of the remaining four items (14%) had a SD minimally greater than 1.0. These results reflect clear wording of items with measurable parameters defined for assessing trainees' skills. The authors present different uses for the assessment instrument, including giving feedback to trainees regarding interviewing techniques and skills; setting "gold" and "lead" standards for clinical C-L interviewing skills; and training supervisors in evaluation using a standardized assessment instrument.

The opinions expressed herein by the author(s) do not necessarily reflect the official endorsement of The Association of Medical School Pediatric Department Chairs, Inc.

Disruptive physician behavior presents a challenge to the academic medical center. Such behaviors threaten the learning environment through increasing staff conflict, role modeling poor behaviors to trainees, and, ultimately, posing a risk to patient safety. Given that these physicians are often respected and valued for their clinical skills, many institutions struggle with how to best manage their behaviors. The authors present a composite case study of an academic physician referred to a professional development program for his disruptive behavior. They outline how transformative learning was applied to the development of concrete learning objectives, activities, and assessments for a curriculum aimed at promoting behavior change. Important themes include a safe group process in which the physician's assumptions are critically examined so that through experiential exercises and reflection, new roles, skills, and behaviors are learned, explored, and practiced. Timely feedback to the physician from the institution, colleagues, and administrators is critical to the physician's understanding of the impact of his or her behavior. Ultimately, the physician returns to practice demonstrating more professional behavior. Implications for medical education, prevention, and other professional development programs are discussed.

The AAP is a professional society dedicated to the advancement of psychiatric education and of professional development, scholarship, and leadership in academic psychiatry. The AAP serves to foster excellence, commitment, and interest in academic psychiatry through educational innovation, research, and collegial dialogue and collaboration.

Background Patient-provider relationships in primary care are characterized by greater continuity and depth than in non-primary care specialties. We hypothesized that relationship styles of medical students based on attachment theory are associated with specialty choice factors and that such factors will mediate the association between relationship style and ultimately matching in a primary care specialty. Methods We determined the relationship styles, demographic characteristics and resident specialty match of 106 fourth-year medical students. We assessed the associations between 1) relationship style and specialty choice factors; 2) specialty choice factors and specialty match, and 3) relationship style and specialty match. We also conducted mediation analyses to determine if factors examined in a specialty choice questionnaire mediate the association between relationship style and ultimately matching in a primary care specialty. Results Prevalence of attachment styles was similar to that found in the general population and other medical school settings with 59% of students rating themselves as having a secure relationship style. Patient centeredness was directly associated, and career rewards inversely associated with matching in a primary care specialty. Students with a self-reliant relationship style were significantly more likely to match in a non-primary care specialty as compared to students with secure relationship style (OR = 5.3, 95% CI 1.8, 15.6). There was full mediation of the association between relationship style and specialty match by the specialty choice factor characterized by patient centeredness. Conclusion Assessing relationship styles based on attachment theory may be a potentially useful way to improve understanding and counsel medical students about specialty choice.

Participants were women (N = 16) living with their children in a residential substance abuse treatment facility. In this within-subjects repeated measures study, a 1-week baseline was followed by a 4-week intervention and a 2-week follow-up (same as the baseline). The intervention consisted of exposure to an educational video and a smoking cessation workbook, brief individual support meetings, and an escalating schedule of voucher-based reinforcement of abstinence. Throughout the study, three daily breath samples (8 a.m., noon, and 4 p.m.) were collected Monday through Friday to determine carbon monoxide (CO) concentration. In addition, urine cotinine (COT) was assessed on Monday mornings to monitor weekend tobacco use. Participants received vouchers of escalating value for CO-negative breath and COT-negative urine samples. Positive samples reset the voucher value. Significantly more negative tests were submitted during the intervention than during baseline and follow-up. The intensive behavioral intervention evaluated in this study produced a substantial reduction in cigarette smoking, and 25% of participants remained abstinent 2 weeks after the intervention was suspended. Nevertheless, the percentage of CO-negative samples submitted during the follow-up returned to baseline levels. While retaining many real-world characteristics, residential treatment facilities provide important opportunities for smoking cessation treatment and research.

Objective: Improving care for depressed primary care (PC) patients requires system-level interventions based on chronic illness management with collaboration among primary care providers (PCPs) and mental health providers (MHPs). We describe the development of an effective collaboration system for an ongoing multisite Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) study evaluating a multifaceted program to improve management of major depression in PC practices. Method: Translating Initiatives for Depression into Effective Solutions (TIDES) is a research project that helps VA facilities adopt depression care improvements for PC patients with depression. A regional telephone-based depression care management program used Depression Case Managers (DCMs) supervised by MHPs to assist PCPs with patient management. The Collaborative Care Workgroup (CWG) was created to facilitate collaboration between PCPs, MHPs, and DCMs. The CWG used a 3-phase process: (1) identify barriers to better depression treatment, (2) identify target problems and solutions, and (3) institutionalize ongoing problem detection and solution through new policies and procedures. Results: The CWG overcame barriers that exist between PCPs and MHPs, leading to high rates of the following: patients with depression being followed by PCPs (82%), referred PC patients with depression keeping their appointments with MHPs (88%), and PC patients with depression receiving antidepressants (76%). The CWG helped sites implement site-specific protocols for addressing patients with suicidal ideation. Conclusion: By applying these steps in PC practices, collaboration between PCPs and MHPs has been improved and maintained. These steps offer a guide to improving collaborative care to manage depression or other chronic disorders within PC clinics.

The epidemic of drug and alcohol abuse in our nation impacts millions of women, mothers, and children. Addicted mothers with complex problems and numerous co-morbidities present unique treatment challenges. This intergenerational cycle of abuse and addiction is difficult to stop. Arkansas CARES (Center for Addictions Research Education and Services, referred to in this article as CARES) initially was created to treat addicted pregnant and postpartum women and their infants. CARES evolved into a residential treatment program for dually diagnosed mothers with their children. This paper is a synopsis of a presentation delivered at the North American Society for Psychosocial Obstetrics and Gynecology. It shares a glimpse inside the treatment program and lessons learned along the way in an effort to assist others who are interested in building treatment programs for addicted women with their children.

Frequently, bills are not submitted for follow-up visits for patients who have been evaluated psychiatrically on medical-surgical services. There often is confusion regarding which procedure codes are most appropriate to use in billing. To help the consultant understand the documentation requirements for various procedure codes, information from several sources was synthesized and distilled. This paper should help minimize documentation errors and maximize reimbursement for clinical services. The authors have reviewed available billing choices, and clarified the documentation requirements for different procedure codes according to Medicare regulations.

In Reply .— I am pleased that the letter by Norton et al gives us the opportunity to clarify the significance and limitations of the findings of our study on the association between maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy and neonatal neurobehavior. As we described in our article, maternal depression during pregnancy is an important public health concern, with implications not only for the health of the mother but also for the health and development of the infant. Treatment of this condition has focused on mothers using SSRIs, with the assumption that these medications are safe for the developing fetus. Our concern is that this assumption is based on research that indicates that prenatal SSRI exposure has little or no impact on development, because exposed infants are born mostly of full birth weight, at full term, and show few physical anomalies. However, over the past 30 years, significant research literature has demonstrated that, in addition to these measures, neurobehavioral assessments provide a measure of …