Search

ilustraciones, gráficos, tablas ; 28 cm. En este artículo se presenta información acerca del sector agrario en el departamento de Boyacá, con el fin de llegar a la superación de la crisis generada por la pandemia Covid-19, se busca identificar varias ventajas y desventajas de la crisis, como lo es el poder recurrir a la tecnología para implementar en procesos del sector de la agronomía que permite una reducción en los costos y mejoras en volumen de la producción y así entender cuáles son los productos de mayor oferta para la venta y el consumo e implementar así estrategias de mercado y asesorías a los campesinos en base a esta información y refiriendo los subsidios y/o ayudas que se pueden otorgar para cada uno de los cultivadores. This article presents information about the agricultural sector in the department of Boyacá, to overcome the crisis generated from the Covid-19 pandemic, several advantages and disadvantages of this crisis will be identified, being an advantage being able to resort to the technology for implementation in agronomy processes and also generate cost reduction and resource optimization; in addition to understanding which are the products of greatest need for sale and consumption and as a result of this project market strategies and advice to farmers based on the information collected and referring to the subsidies and aid that can be granted for each of the growers. Especialización Especialista en Gerencia Financiera Especialización en Gerencia Financiera

The literature on development effectiveness has traditionally focused on the ex-post analysis of projects. While this is the appropriate method of measuring benefits, a previous step must be taken as a forerunner to good ex-post evaluation: the measurement of the efficiency in the execution of investment projects. This document aims to identify the determinants of good execution. Unlike previous studies, the current study analyzes execution using a project life cycle approach. Using an Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) database with information from various departments, the authors identify the factors that are associated with faster or slower disbursement on several stages of the projects' life cycle. The basic premise is that the duration of an investment project - that is, the days elapsed from its approval to its final disbursement - is associated with preparation and execution-related factors as well as exogenous country factors. There is evidence that a sound macroeconomic and fiscal environment in countries is important for the purposes of good execution. Moreover, the authors find that delays in project planning and execution substantially extend project lives. These findings suggest the need to continue to improve efficiency in these areas. Finally, the authors find differences in project life cycles that are associated with delays caused by the projects' executing units.

The literature on development effectiveness has traditionally focused on the ex-post analysis of projects. While this is the appropriate method of measuring benefits, a previous step must be taken as a forerunner to good ex-post evaluation: the measurement of the efficiency in the execution of investment projects. This document aims to identify the determinants of good execution. Unlike previous studies, the current study analyzes execution using a project life cycle approach. Using an Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) database with information from various departments, the authors identify the factors that are associated with faster or slower disbursement on several stages of the projects' life cycle. The basic premise is that the duration of an investment project - that is, the days elapsed from its approval to its final disbursement - is associated with preparation and execution-related factors as well as exogenous country factors. There is evidence that a sound macroeconomic and fiscal environment in countries is important for the purposes of good execution. Moreover, the authors find that delays in project planning and execution substantially extend project lives. These findings suggest the need to continue to improve efficiency in these areas. Finally, the authors find differences in project life cycles that are associated with delays caused by the projects' executing units.