Search

Context Reporting temporal trends in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) helps guide management strategies. Objective This work aimed to report the trends in disease burden and clinical outcomes over time that cannot be adequately captured from individual clinical trials. Methods A retrospective study was held of ACC patients seen at a referral cancer center between February 1998 and August 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared between an early cohort (February 1998-June 2007) and a late cohort (July 2007-August 2019). Results A total of 621 patients included with a median age at diagnosis of 49.3 years (range, 0.5-86.6 years). There were 285 (45.9%) patients with hormonal overproduction. More patients in the late cohort had stage IV disease compared to the early cohort (36.8% vs 23.1%; P Conclusion ACC clinical outcomes improved over the past 2 decades as more patients had complete resection or received more lines of systemic therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has limited systemic therapy options when discovered at an advanced stage. Thus, there is a need for accessible and minimally invasive biomarkers of response to guide the selection of patients for treatment. This study investigated the biomarker value of plasma growth hormone (GH) level as a potential biomarker to predict outcome in unresectable HCC patients treated with current standard therapy, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev).Study included unresectable HCC patients scheduled to receive Atezo/Bev. Patients were followed to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Plasma GH levels were measured by ELISA and used to stratify the HCC patients into GH-high and GH-low groups (the cutoff normal GH levels in women and men are ≤3.7 μg/L and ≤0.9 μg/L, respectively). Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate median OS and PFS and Log rank test was used to compare survival outcomes between GH-high and -low groups.Thirty-seven patients were included in this analysis, of whom 31 were males and 6 females, with a median age of 67 years (range: 37-80). At the time of the analysis, the one-year survival rate was 70% (95% CI: 0.51, 0.96) among GH low patients and 33% (95% CI: 0.16, 0.67) among GH high patients. OS was significantly superior in GH-low compared to GH-high patients (median OS: 18.9 vs. 9.3 months;Plasma GH is a biomarker candidate for predicting treatment outcomes in advanced HCC patients treated with Atezo/Bev. This finding should be further validated in larger randomized clinical trials in advanced HCC patients.

Background Early in the pandemic, heath care workers (HCWs) were deemed to be at high risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 from their patients and distanced themselves from their families. This study aimed to estimate the seropositivity of a cohort of healthcare over time while also looking for associations between seroconversion and hospital and community SARS CoV-2 exposures. Methods This is a prospective cohort study of HCWs from patient care (PC) and non-patient care (NPC) areas conducted from April 2020 through Dec 2020 at Hurley Medical Center in Flint, Michigan (MI). The first case of SARS-CoV-2 was diagnosed in MI on 3/10/2020. In early April 2020, HCWs underwent serum testing for total SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein antibody and completed a questionnaire to collect data on demographics, travel, job characteristics, in and out of hospital SARS-CoV-2 exposures, and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The serum testing and survey were offered to the same HCWs in late May 2020 and again in December 2020. Statistical analysis such as Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test were used to determine if there was an association with SARS-CoV-2 antibody status for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results At baseline, 20/192 (10.4%) of HCWs were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 total antibody with 9/20 (45%) providing PC. Job title was known for all participants however, initial survey completion was 79.6%. Eight weeks later, 13/131 (9.9%) were positive of which 5/13 (38.4%) were new seroconversions, 2/5 (40%) in PC. Eight months after the initial draw, 16/120 (13.3%) were positive with 13/16 (81.3%) new, 7/13 in PC (54%). The number of HCWs who tested positive at any time during the study was 38/192 (19.8%). No significant associations were found between seroconversion and taking care of COVID patients, any direct patient care duties, or other variables collected at the two-sided threshold of 0.05. Conclusion No association in this small study was found between PC and SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroconversion. HCWs in NPC areas were as likely to test positive as those in PC likely reflecting community prevalence. Universal masking at the medical center and use of full PPE to care for probable and confirmed COVID patients likely prevented higher rates of PC acquisition. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Muhammad O Awiwi,1 Khaled M Elsayes,1 Yehia I Mohamed,2 Lina Altameemi,2 Migena Gjoni,3 Omayr Muhammad Irshad,4 Ahmed Sayed Ahmed,5 Ahmad O Kaseb,2 Usama Salem1 1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 3Department of Internal Medicine, The of Istanbul-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 4John Sealy School of Medicine, Galveston, TX, USA; 5Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USACorrespondence: Khaled M Elsayes, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA, Tel +1 877 632-6789, Fax +1 713 794-4535, Email KMElsayes@mdanderson.orgPurpose: To identify prognostic clinical and radiologic features in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.Patients and Methods: Clinical and imaging records of patients with unresectable HCC were retrospectively reviewed, and baseline features were recorded. Patients’ records and imaging studies were used to determine the patients’ overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine prognostic features. Subanalyses of treatment-naïve patients (who never received local or systemic therapy) and previously treated patients were also performed.Results: Fifty-five patients were included in the final analysis, 23 (41.8%) of whom were treatment naïve. The median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 3.0 months and 7.9 months. The 3-, 6- and 12-month OS rates were 85.5%, 79.8% and 45.7%, respectively. The 3-, 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 50.1%, 41.2% and 20.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, independent prognostic features for poor PFS of the entire cohort were pleural effusions (p = 0.047, HR: 6.3; CI: 1.03– 38.90) and hepatic vein tumor thrombus (p = 0.005; HR: 23.37; CI: 2.63– 207.67); independent prognostic features for poor OS were ascites (p = 0.008; HR: 37.37; CI: 2.53– 467.64), pleural effusion (p = 0.003; HR: 110.17; CI: 5.00– 2426.54), and low (< 40HU) pre-contrast attenuation on CT images (p = 0.007; HR: 0.09; CI: 0.02– 0.53). On subanalysis of treatment-naïve patients, the median OS and PFS were 7.4 months and 2.8 months, respectively. The 3-, 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 43.5%, 38.6% and 24.8%, respectively. Pleural effusion was the only independent poor prognostic feature (p = 0.036; HR: 206.34; CI: 1.41– 30,167.58).Conclusion: Independent prognostic features for survival outcomes include the presence of ascites, pleural effusions, hepatic vein tumor thrombus, and HCC with low attenuation (< 40 HU) on unenhanced CT images. Although several biochemical variables were significant on univariate analysis, none were independent predictors of OS or PFS.Keywords: radiographic, radiology, RECIST, survival, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

BackgroundThere is no effective systemic therapy for metastatic adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The efficacies of single-agent oral multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) or salvage immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been very limited. It is unknown whether combining CPIs, such as pembrolizumab (PEM), with other therapies, such as MKIs, could yield higher response rates in ACC, yet this combination has shown promise in other cancers. Herein, we describe the first case series using PEM in combination with the MKI lenvatinib (LEN) in patients with progressive, metastatic ACC.MethodsA retrospective case series describing the use of LEN/PEM as salvage therapy in patients with progressive/metastatic ACC.ResultsEight patients were treated with the LEN/PEM combination therapy. Half were female, and the median age at time of diagnosis was 38 years (range 21–49). Three (37.5%) patients had hormonally active ACC. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 4 (range 2–9). Six (75%) patients had had disease progression on prior CPIs and five (62.5%) patients had progressed on prior MKI therapy. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI 1.8–not reached) and median duration of therapy was 8.5 months (range 2–22). Two (25%) patients had a partial response, one (12.5%) patient had stable disease, and five (62.5%) patients had progressive disease. None of the eight patients stopped therapy because of adverse events.ConclusionsIn our small cohort of heavily pretreated patients with ACC, the combination of LEN/PEM was associated with objective responses in a subset of patients without significant toxicity. This combination should be formally investigated in phase II clinical trial with robust correlative studies to identify predictors for response.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) in an aggressive malignancy with suboptimal response to frontline chemotherapy and without established second line treatment. cMET activation is associated with ACC resistance to chemotherapy. Cabozantinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that targets the VEGFR, c-MET, AXL, and RET receptors. We report interim data about using cabozantinib in ACC through a prospective phase II clinical trial. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, open label clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with unresectable/metastatic ACC (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03370718). The primary objective is 4-month progression-free survival rate (PFS4). Participants are ≥ 18 years old with histologically confirmed ACC. Subjects who used mitotane within 6 months of consent must have mitotane serum level of < 2 mg/L. Cabozantinib starting dose is 60 mg daily with possible dose reductions. Subjects stopped treatment at time of disease progression, death, or occurrence of severe adverse events. Objective tumor responses were assessed per RECIST v.1.1 criteria. Adverse effects were graded per CTCAE v.4.03 Results: At time of data cut off (Oct 28, 2019), we screened 16 patients for enrollment. Ten patients (3 females) received cabozantinib out of whom 5 had history of mitotane use. Nine patients were eligible for response evaluation, defined as having at least one follow up imaging. One patient was taken off study after one week due to hypertensive crisis. Median age at time of diagnosis was 45 years (range 32 - 72). Five patients had hormonally active ACC. Median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 2 (range 0 -5). Median duration of cabozantinib therapy was 6.6 months (range 0.7 -11.3). Eight patients (80%) were without evidence of progression at 4 months (achieved study endpoint). At time of data cut off, 1 patient had partial response (53% reduction over 8.8 months and ongoing), 3 patients had stable disease, and 5 patients had progressive disease. Nine patients were alive with disease and one patient died (not drug related). Grade 3/4 clinical adverse events included thromboembolic events (3 patients), severe hypertension (1 patient), intracranial hemorrhage secondary to hypertensive crisis (1 patient), weight loss (1 patient), and abdominal pain (1 patient). Grade 3/4 laboratory adverse events included increased AST (2 patient), increased ALT (1 patient), increased GGT, increased amylase (1 patient), increased lipase (1 patient) and hyponatremia (1 patient). Conclusions: In this interim analysis of phase II study, majority of subjects reached the study primary endpoint (PFS4). These data are in favor of continuing study accrual to assess magnitude of response to therapy and safety profile in ACC. Aggressive blood pressure management and close monitoring of liver enzymes are crucial to ensure the safety of study subjects.

Introduction: Most thyroid cancers (TC) are due to mutually exclusive somatic driver mutations. NTRK fusions are rare oncogenic drivers in papillary TC (PTC), poorly differentiated TC (PDTC) and anaplastic TC (ATC), estimated to be in 2.3% of all TC. However, the clinical presentation and behavior of TRK-fusion TC remains largely unknown. Methods / Case Presentation: Using institutional databases, we identified all TC patients (pts) with an NTRK fusion reported on somatic testing performed by a CLIA-certified laboratory. Data from the medical records were collected. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and pathological features of TC pts whose tumors harbored an NTRK fusion. Results / Discussion: We identified 36 TC pts with somatic NTRK fusions. Fusion testing was generally done in pts with advanced or radioactive iodine refractory (RAI-R) disease. Median age at diagnosis was 27.4 years (range 4–75 years), 21 (58%) were female and 16 (44%) were pediatric. 28/36 (78%) pts had PTC, 2/36 (5%) PDTC and 6/36 (17%) ATC. There were a total of 12 (33%) NTRK1, 24 (67%) NTRK3, and no NTRK2 fusions. In ATC and PDTC pts NTRK3 was the most common NTRK fusion 7/8 (87%). In PTC pts, 11 (39%) had NTRK1 and 17 (61%) had NTRK3. In the adult pts NTRK3 was more common 17/20 (85%) (Odds Ratio 7.2, P=0.013), however, in pediatric pts rate of NTRK1 and NTRK3 were similar. One pt had additional mutations along with the NTRK fusion, an ATC pt with multiple mutations including BRAF V600E. Of the 30 PTC/PDTC pts, 23 (77%) had distant metastases (mets). 14 (38%) pts had distant mets at diagnosis and 11 (69%) pediatric pts had distant mets. Lung 21 (70%) and bone 9 (30%) were the most common distant mets sites. In the PTC pts with distant mets, 9 (41%) had RAI-avid and 11 (50%) had RAI-R disease. In the entire cohort of 36 pts, 17 (53%) were on a systemic therapy of whom 11 pts were PTC. NTRK directed was the most common systemic therapy 16 (94%). All PTC pts were alive with a median time from diagnosis of 46 months (Interquartile 1–3: 25–118 months). Four ATC and one PDTC pts had died at the time of the analysis. Conclusions: In this study we confirmed that NTRK fusions occur primarily in PTC but also in less differentiated tumors. Most were young pts but NTRK fusions were identified in tumors from adults as old as 75 years. NTRK1 and NTRK3 were the most common NTRK fusions with NTRK3 being more common in adults. In thyrocyte-derived TC pts, NTRK fusions are mutually exclusive genetic events that occur in pts of all ages and varying histologies. Given the availability of NTRK targeted therapy, consideration should be given to testing for NTRK fusions in advanced thyroid cancer pts, especially those in whom prior genetic testing did not identify an oncogenic driver.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with high risk of recurrence despite macroscopically complete surgical resection. The main predictors of ACC recurrence include advanced disease stage, incomplete surgical resection, cortisol production, certain genetic alterations, and high proliferation rate (Ki-67 proliferation index). Mitotane has been the mainstay adjuvant therapy of ACC. However, the use of mitotane is based on retrospective and occasionally conflicting evidence. As mitotane levels can take a few months before reaching therapeutic levels, there is an emerging practice of combining platinum-based chemotherapy with mitotane in the adjuvant setting. Retrospective data indicate that radiotherapy is an option for select patients, particularly those with positive resection margins. There are multiple knowledge gaps in selecting patients for adjuvant therapy. It is of great importance to establish risk calculators to predict recurrence and to implement molecular profiling of ACC to guide adjuvant therapy. The role of immunotherapy in metastatic ACC is emerging and if deemed efficacious, then future studies will be needed to ascertain the role of adjuvant immunotherapy in ACC.

Personalized cell therapy targeting tumor antigens with expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has shown great promise in metastatic melanoma (MM) since the 90s. However, MM was first-in line to benefit from the wave of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), which shifted the focus of immunotherapy almost fully to immune CPI. Still, the majority of patients fail to benefit from CPI treatment, raising the intriguing question on how TIL therapy may fit into the changing landscape of melanoma treatment. We took advantage of data from a unique cohort of patients with MM treated with T-cell therapy in consecutive clinical trials at our institution across the last 10 years. Based on detailed data on patient characteristics, pre-TIL and post-TIL treatments and long-term follow-up, we were able to address the important issue of how TIL therapy can be positioned in the current CPI era. We found that previous progression on anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 do not seem to harm neither rate nor duration of response to TIL therapy. Importantly, even in the hard-to-treat population of patients who progressed on antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1), an objective response rate of 32% was achieved, including durable responses. Yet, median progression-free survival was reduced in this anti-PD-1 refractory population. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00937625, NCT02379195 and NCT02354690.

e16626 Background: Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FLHCC) is a variant of HCC that comprises ∼1%–9% of all HCCs, with about 200 annual cases reported globally, most often affects younger patients (10–35 years of age) with no underlying liver disease. There is no current standard of care therapy for unresectable FLHCC. We report an analysis of the treatment outcomes, and prognostic indicators of 26 cases. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic and treatment outcome data from 26 FLHCC patients who received interferon alfa-2b (IFN) based therapy. Median overall survival (OS) and PFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and survival rates were compared by the log-rank test. Results: 21 patient underwent treatment with continuous infusion (CI) 5-Fluorouracil (FU) at 200 mg/m2/day for 7 days on, 7 days off plus IFN at 4 million units/m2, subQ every other day for 7 days on, 7 days off, 1 patient FU+IFN+bevacizumab and 4 patients had PIAF (cisPlatin+IFN+Adriamycin+FU). Median age was 24 years (15-44), 13 males and 13 females, 8 of the 26 patients died, the median overall survival was 33.9 months (95% CI, 20.9, NA), estimated 3-year survival was 20.2% (95% CI: 4.1%, 98.5%), median follow up time was 13.4 months (95% CI: 9.79, NA) and median progression-free survival was 11.7 months (95% CI: 5.09, NA). The estimated 1-year survival was 47.9% (95% CI: 29.9%, 76.8%). Finally, FU+IFN combination was the most frequently used systemic therapy. 3/26 pts underwent surgical resection following neoadjuvant treatment with interferon based therapy; Interferon based therapy for the 26 patients had limited side effects, with only 3 of the 26 patients discontinued treatment due to grade 3-4 adverse event in the form of mucositis, severe fatigue and/or hematologic toxicity. Conclusions: Our analyses indicate that CI FU + IFN could be an effective treatment for FLHCC, and may have a neoadjuvant role in this disease with 3/26 were resectable following neoadjuvant treatment with interferon based therapy. This regimen can be well tolerated. Unfortunately, nonsurgical options for patients with FLC remain limited with no approved local or systemic therapies. Therefore, future research is needed to identify better multimodality therapies.

e16659 Background: Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score is widely used in the assessment of prognosis of HCC and CTP-A is the standard criterion for active therapy and clinical trials entry. Recently, ALBI and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF)-CTP scores have been reported to improve survival prediction over CTP score. However, comparative studies to compare both scores and to integrate IGF into Albi score are lacking. Methods: After institutional board approval, data and samples were prospectively collected. 299 HCC patients who had data to generate both IGF-CPG and Albi index were used. The ALBI index, and IGF score were calculated, Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to evaluation the association between overall survival (OS) and CTP, IGF-CTP, Albi and IGF, albumin, bilirubin. Harrell’s Concordance index (C-index) was calculated to evaluate the ability of the three score system to predict overall survival. And the U-statistics was used to compare the performance of prediction of OS between the score system. Results: OS association with CTP, IGF-CTP and Albi was performed (Table). IGF-CTP B was associated with a higher risk of death than A (HR = 1.6087, 95% CI: 1.2039, 2.1497, p = 0.0013), ALBI grade 2 was also associated with a higher risk of death than 1 (HR = 2.2817, 95% CI: 1.7255, 3.0172, p < 0.0001). IGF-1(analyzed as categorical variable) was independently associated with OS after adjusting for the effects of ALBI grade. Which showed IGF-1 ≤26 was significantly associated with poor OS, P = 0.001. Conclusions: Although ALBI grade and IGF-CTP score in this analysis had similar prognostic values in most cases, their benefits might be heterogenous in some specific conditions. We looked into corporation of IGF-1 into ALBI grade, IGF score with cutoff ≤26 which clearly refined OS prediction and better OS stratification of ALBI-grade.

4599 Background: In resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgical resection is associated with high recurrence rates. However, there is no approved neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies yet. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy effect has never been reported in this setting in HCC. Methods: This is a randomized phase II trial of nivolumab (Arm A) or nivolumab + ipilimumab (Arm B) as peri-operative treatment for patients (pts) with HCC who are eligible for surgical resection. Pts in Arm A are given nivolumab 240 mg iv, every 2 weeks (wks) for a total of 3 doses followed by surgery on week 6. Pts in Arm B are treated with nivolumab per same schedule as arm A plus concurrent ipilimumab 1 mg/kg on day 1. Adjuvant part of study starts 4 weeks after surgery, with Nivolumab at 480 mg iv every 4 weeks for 2 years in arm A. Pts in Arm B are treated with nivolumab per same schedule as arm A plus concurrent ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks times 4 doses after resection. The primary objective was the safety/tolerability of nivolumab +/- ipilimumab. Secondary objectives include overall response rate, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and time to progression. Exploratory objectives include evaluating the pre- and post-treatment immunological changes in tumor tissues and peripheral blood. Results: 30 patients were enrolled, 2 patients withdrew consent, one patient was not eligible at time of therapy, and 27 randomized (13 to Arm A and 14 to Arm B). 21 patients proceeded with resection as planned and surgery was aborted for 6 patients; 1 for frozen abdomen due to old surgery, 2 for small residual volume, and 3 for progressive disease. Pts age ranged between 32-83 yo, 75 % were males, 7 pts had HCV, 7 had HBV and 7 had no hepatitis. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was observed in 5/21 pts (24% pCR rate) – 2 in Arm A and 3 Arm B, and 3/21 pts (16%) – 1 in Arm A, 2 in Arm B, achieved major pathologic response (necrosis effect of 50-99%). 5 patients in Arm B and 1 in Arm A experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity prior to surgery. No grade 4 or higher toxicity were observed and surgery was not delayed or cancelled due to oxicity. Conclusions: Our study reached its primary endpoint of safety. Importantly, we report a 40% pathologic response rate = pCR rate of 24%, and major necrosis rate of 16% for resectable HCC after preoperative immunotherapy in a randomized phase II pilot trial. After future validation, these promising results may contribute to a paradigm shift in the perioperative treatment of resectable HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03222076 .

e16660 Background: Sorafenib is the first systemic therapy approved for advanced HCC treatment; with no accurate tool available to help predict survival and treatment outcome and to guide therapy decisions. Our novel blood-based insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF)-Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score comprises levels of IGF-1, bilirubin, INR, and albumin. IGF-CP score significantly improved the prediction of HCC survival in our recently published studies. The current prospective study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of 116 patients with CTP-A HCC treated with sorafenib whose score is reclassified as IGF-A (AA) to that of patients whose score is reclassified as IGF-B/C (AB/AC). Methods: After the approval of the institutional review boards and signing written informed consent, a total of 116 patients with HCC were prospectively enrolled and started on sorafenib and followed until progression or death. We calculated IGF-CTP scores, used Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test to estimate and compare time to event outcomes between subgroups of patients. Results: 116 patients were CTP class A, 87 of the patients with CTP class A were classified as IGF-CTP-A and had median OS of 13.16 ms (95% CI = 12.04 to 22.6 ms), and a median PFS of 5.82 months (ms) (95% CI = 4.34 to 9.14 ms), whereas 29 patients were reclassified as intermediate risk (IGF-CTP-B) and had had a higher risk of death with a shorter OS of 7.6 months (95% CI = 5.23 to 24.47 months) and shorter PFS of 3.49 months (95% CI = 2.53 to 5.26 months). There was higher overall rate of adverse events in the CTP-A patients reclassified as IGF-CTP B than IGF-CTP A especially in grade III-IV adverse events, upper GI Bleeding, lower GI Bleeding, nose bleeding, renal failure, liver failure, encephalopathy, fatigue, weight loss, anorexia, and vomiting. Conclusions: The results of this study support our biologically-driven hypothesis that among HCC patients with CTP-A class treated with sorafenib, those reclassified as IGF-CTP-B/C will have poorer prognosis in terms of shorter OS and PFS. Thus, our study provides an objective non-invasive strategy to better predict the outcome in HCC patients undergoing systemic therapy. Future validation of our IGF-1 score may lead to adopting it as a stratification tool in clinical trials as well as to predict HCC outcome and guide therapy decision in routine practice.