Search

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to the subject matter or materials discussed in this article.

Background: Locally advanced rectal tumors are typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Short-course chemoradiotherapy (SCRT, 2500 cGy in five fractions) is a convenient alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy with long-course radiotherapy (CCRT, 4500 cGy in 25 fractions) without sacrificing efficacy. We aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of SCRT and CCRT in patients with mid- and low- rectal tumors who underwent total mesorectal excision using real-world data., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy from 2011 to 2022. We analyzed the clinicopathological findings and prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival in the SCRT and CCRT groups and compared the outcomes using propensity score matching., Results: Among the 66 patients in the two groups, no disparities were noted in the demographic features, pathological remission, or downstaging rates. Nonetheless, the SCRT group exhibited superior 3-year disease-free survival (81.8% vs 62.1%, p = 0.011), whereas the overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups. The initial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and neoadjuvant SCRT were associated with the recurrence rates [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13-4.10; HR = 0.19-0.74], but the harvested lymph node count was not (HR = 0.51-1.97)., Conclusion: Among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, SCRT combined with four cycles of FOLFOX was shown to enhance short-term disease-free survival. Factors impacting recurrence include the initial CEA level and SCRT, but not the harvested lymph node count., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to the subject matter or materials discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2024, the Chinese Medical Association.)

Salvage treatment for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has yet to be identified. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a salvage lenvatinib-based regimen for refractory mCRC. In total, 371 patients were categorized into lenvatinib-based and non-lenvatinib-based groups. In the lenvatinib-based group, patients who received lenvatinib at a dosage of 10 mg/day were categorized into lenvatinib/chemotherapy and lenvatinib/immunotherapy subgroups. We reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. OS1 was used to measure the time from disease progression after TAS-102 and regorafenib treatment to death, while OS2 was used to measure the time from TAS-102 or regorafenib treatment to death. Propensity score matching analysis was employed to compare the characteristics between the lenvatinib-based and non-lenvatinib-based groups. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) information was analyzed using R software. The lenvatinib-based group exhibited longer OS than did the non-lenvatinib-based group (OS1, 11.4 vs. 3.7 months; OS2, 27.2 vs. 8.2 months). The disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) of the lenvatinib-based regimens were 69.4% and 6.1%, respectively. Lenvatinib/chemotherapy and lenvatinib/immunotherapy had similar PFS, OS, DCR, and ORR. The adverse effects were manageable. After propensity score matching, the lenvatinib-based group continued to exhibit significantly longer OS1 and OS2 than did the non-lenvatinib-based group. NGS analysis revealed that GNAS and KRAS alterations were associated with a worse treatment response and prolonged survival, respectively. In conclusion, a moderate-dose salvage lenvatinib-based regimen demonstrated promising clinical activity and tolerability in treating refractory mCRC., Competing Interests: None., (AJCR Copyright © 2024.)