Search

We establish a recursive relation for the bipartition number $p_2(n)$ which might be regarded as an analogue of Euler's recursive relation for the partition number $p(n)$. Two proofs of the main result are proved in this article. The first one is using the generating function, and the second one is using combinatoric objects (called ``symbols'') created by Lusztig for studying representation theory of finite classical groups.

An almost $k$-cover of the hypercube $Q^n = \{0,1\}^n$ is a collection of hyperplanes that avoids the origin and covers every other vertex at least $k$ times. When $k$ is large with respect to the dimension $n$, Clifton and Huang asymptotically determined the minimum possible size of an almost $k$-cover. Central to their proof was an extension of the LYM inequality, concerning a weighted count of hyperplanes. In this paper we completely characterise the hyperplanes of maximum weight, showing that there are $\binom{2n-1}{n}$ such planes. We further provide stability, bounding the weight of all hyperplanes that are not of maximum weight. These results allow us to effectively shrink the search space when using integer linear programming to construct small covers, and as a result we are able to determine the exact minimum size of an almost $k$-cover of $Q^6$ for most values of $k$. We further use the stability result to improve the Clifton--Huang lower bound for infinitely many choices of $k$ in every sufficiently large dimension $n$., Comment: 15 pages

In this paper we show that the conjecture of Lemmens and Seidel of 1973 for systems of equiangular lines with common angle $\arccos (1/5)$ is true. Our main tool is forbidden subgraphs for smallest Seidel eigenvalue $-5$., Comment: 28 pages, 2 tables, 6 figures

In this paper, claims by Lemmens and Seidel in 1973 about equiangular sets of lines with angle $1/5$ are proved by carefully analyzing pillar decompositions, with the aid of the uniqueness of two-graphs on $276$ vertices. The Neumann Theorem is generalized in the sense that if there are more than $2r-2$ equiangular lines in $\mathbb{R}^r$, then the angle is quite restricted. Together with techniques on finding saturated equiangular sets, we determine the maximum size of equiangular sets "exactly" in an $r$-dimensional Euclidean space for $r = 8$, $9$, and $10$., Comment: 19 pages, 2 figures. The current bounds for maximum cardinalities of equiangular sets in low dimensions has been updated (Table 1). Lemma 4.8 is corrected, and Theorem 5.3 has been improved. The existence of 14 equiangular lines of rank 8 with angle $(2\sqrt{2}-1)/7$ has been shown (Remark after Theorem 5.3)

A set of lines through the origin in Euclidean space is called equiangular when any pair of lines from the set intersects with each other at a common angle. We study the maximum size of equiangular lines in Euclidean space and use graph theoretic approach to prove that all the currently known construction for maximum equiangular lines in $\mathbb R^d$ cannot add another line to form a larger equiangular set of lines if $14 \leq d \leq 20$ and $d \neq 15$. We give new constructions of large equiangular lines which are 248 equiangular lines in $\mathbb R^{42}$, 200 equiangular lines in $\mathbb{R}^{41}$, 168 equiangular lines in $\mathbb{R}^{40}$, 152 equiangular lines in $\mathbb R^{39}$ with angle $1/7$, and 56 equiangular lines in $\mathbb R^{18}$ with angle $1/5$., Comment: 6 pages; title changed; new results about constructions of large equiangular sets are added in Section 3

In this paper we introduce the definition of marked permutations. We first present a bijection between Stirling permutations and marked permutations. We then present an involution on Stirling derangements. Furthermore, we present a symmetric bivariate enumerative polynomials on $r$-colored marked permutations. Finally, we give an explanation of $r$-colored marked permutations by using the language of combinatorial objects., Comment: 12 pages, 2 figures

We examine the exponential generating function for the number of symmetric involutions (A000898 in OEIS) and point out that Robinson's asymptotic formula for its coefficients is incorrect. We further supply the correct formula.