Search

Summary Aims The aim of the study was to assess mechanical muscle capacities and profiles of well-trained soccer goalkeepers playing at a national amateur level. Methods Eleven goalkeepers (from 4th French division) performed vertical jump tests and series of loaded half squat and bench throw tests to assess lower and upper limbs force-velocity profiles, respectively. Force, velocity and power produced during each exercise were determined using a guided barbell. Maximal theoretical velocity and maximal theoretical force were determined from the force-velocity profiles. Slopes of those profiles were also calculated. Results Vertical jump performances were 38.5 ± 4.5 cm for the squat jump and 41.6 ± 5.5 cm for the countermovement jump. Lower limbs stiffness was 304.2 ± 55.1 N.m−1.kg−1. Lower limbs force-velocity profile was described by a slope of −11.5 ± 4.0 N.s.m−1.kg−1, with maximal theoretical force and velocity reaching 34.3 ± 5.9 N.kg−1 and 3.2 ± 0.2 m.s−1, respectively. Upper limbs muscular profile was described by a slope of −3.7 ± 1.1 N.s.m−1.kg−1, with maximal theoretical force and velocity of 13.6 ± 3.7 N.kg−1 and 3.7 ± 0.6 m.s−1, respectively. These values reveal that goalkeepers’ muscles profiles are oriented towards velocity. Conclusion This suggests that whatever the goalkeepers’ level, specific and conditioning trainings should mainly focus on velocity to optimize the performance of this specific soccer player.

The interest in whole-body vibration (WBV) for the enhancement of neuromuscular performance has received considerable attention. However, scientific evidence supporting the optimal prescription of WBV settings is lacking. This study investigated the acute effect of WBV combining high frequency/high peak-to-peak displacement (HH) or low frequency/low peak-to-peak displacement (LL) vs. sham intervention (SHAM) on lower limb muscle power and stiffness. A total of 223 volunteers were randomly assigned to either the HH, LL or SHAM group. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height, maximal and average power, maximal and average lower limbs stiffness obtained during a hopping test were recorded before and after the respective intervention. After the intervention, the HH group showed an increase of 4.64% in CMJ height (p0.001) whereas the values of both the LL and SHAM groups did not change. In addition, maximal and average power of the lower limbs were significantly increased in all groups (p0.001; 10.89% and 12.82%, respectively) while no effect on lower limbs stiffness was observed. Our data show that high frequency combined with high peak-to-peak displacement is the most optimal WBV setting for CMJ height enhancement. Further investigation should be undertaken to ascertain the effectiveness of WBV on lower limbs stiffness.