Search

Carcinogenesis, as every biological process, is not purely deterministic as all systems are subject to random perturbations from the environment. In tumor growth models, the values of the parameters are subjected to many uncertainties that can arise from experimental variations or due to patient-specific data. The present work is devoted to the development and analysis of numerical methods for the solution of a system of stochastic partial differential equations governing a six-species tumor growth model. The model system simulates the stochastic behavior of cellular and macrocellular events affecting the evolution of avascular cancerous tissue. It is a continuous phase-field model that incorporates several key features in tumor dynamics. A sensitivity analysis is performed to identify the more influential parameters. A mixed finite element method and a stochastic collocation scheme are introduced to approximate random-variables components of the solution. The results of numerous numerical experiments are also presented and discussed. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 31: 552-574, 2015 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We seek to establish a parsimonious mathematical framework for understanding the interaction and dynamics of the response of pancreatic cancer to the NGC triple chemotherapy regimen (mNab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin), stromal-targeting drugs (calcipotriol and losartan), and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-L1). We developed a set of ordinary differential equations describing changes in tumor size (growth and regression) under the influence of five cocktails of treatments. Model calibration relies on three tumor volume measurements obtained over a 14-day period in a genetically engineered pancreatic cancer model (KrasLSLG12D-Trp53LSLR172H-Pdx1-Cre). Our model reproduces tumor growth in the control and treatment scenarios with an average concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.99±0.01. We conduct leave-one-out predictions (average CCC=0.74±0.06), mouse-specific predictions (average CCC=0.75±0.02), and hybrid, group-informed, mouse-specific predictions (average CCC=0.85±0.04). The developed mathematical model demonstrates high accuracy in fitting the experimental tumor data and a robust ability to predict tumor response to treatment. This approach has important implications for optimizing combination NGC treatment strategies.

Immunotherapies such as checkpoint blockade to PD1 and CTLA4 can have varied effects on individual tumors. To quantify the successes and failures of these therapeutics, we developed a stepwise mathematical modeling strategy and applied it to mouse models of colorectal and breast cancer that displayed a range of therapeutic responses. Using longitudinal tumor volume data, an exponential growth model was utilized to designate response groups for each tumor type. The exponential growth model was then extended to describe the dynamics of the quality of vasculature in the tumors via [ 18 F] fluoromisonidazole (FMISO)-positron emission tomography (PET) data estimating tumor hypoxia over time. By calibrating the mathematical system to the PET data, several biological drivers of the observed deterioration of the vasculature were quantified. The mathematical model was then further expanded to explicitly include both the immune response and drug dosing, so that model simulations are able to systematically investigate biological hypotheses about immunotherapy failure and to generate experimentally testable predictions of immune response. The modeling results suggest elevated immune response fractions (> 30 %) in tumors unresponsive to immunotherapy is due to a functional immune response that wanes over time. This experimental-mathematical approach provides a means to evaluate dynamics of the system that could not have been explored using the data alone, including tumor aggressiveness, immune exhaustion, and immune cell functionality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare they have no competing conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The heterogeneity inherent in cancer means that even a successful clinical trial merely results in a therapeutic regimen that achieves, on average, a positive result only in a subset of patients. The only way to optimize an intervention for an individual patient is to reframe their treatment as their own, personalized trial. Toward this goal, we formulate a computational framework for performing personalized trials that rely on four mathematical techniques. First, mathematical models that can be calibrated with patient-specific data to make accurate predictions of response. Second, digital twins built on these models capable of simulating the effects of interventions. Third, optimal control theory applied to the digital twins to optimize outcomes. Fourth, data assimilation to continually update and refine predictions in response to therapeutic interventions. In this perspective, we describe each of these techniques, quantify their "state of readiness", and identify use cases for personalized clinical trials., Competing Interests: Effective July 2023, A.M.V. will receive an Honorarium from Elsevier Ltd. T.E.Y., D.A.H., and C.W. have a pending patent (US Provisional Patent Application No. 63/247233 filed September 22, 2021, pending). T.E.Y. and G.L. have a pending patent (US Provisional Patent Application No. 18/135580 filed August 8, 2023, pending). No other author declares a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Cancer is a disease driven by random DNA mutations and the interaction of many complex phenomena. To improve the understanding and ultimately find more effective treatments, researchers leverage computer simulations mimicking the tumor growth in silico . The challenge here is to account for the many phenomena influencing the disease progression and treatment protocols. This work introduces a computational model to simulate vascular tumor growth and the response to drug treatments in 3D. It consists of two agent-based models for the tumor cells and the vasculature. Moreover, partial differential equations govern the diffusive dynamics of the nutrients, the vascular endothelial growth factor, and two cancer drugs. The model focuses explicitly on breast cancer cells over-expressing HER2 receptors and a treatment combining standard chemotherapy (Doxorubicin) and monoclonal antibodies with anti-angiogenic properties (Trastuzumab). However, large parts of the model generalize to other scenarios. We show that the model qualitatively captures the effects of the combination therapy by comparing our simulation results with previously published pre-clinical data. Furthermore, we demonstrate the scalability of the model and the associated C++ code by simulating a vascular tumor occupying a volume of 400 mm using a total of 92.5 million agents.3 using a total of 92.5 million agents.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer is frequently treated with drugs that target the HER2 receptor, such as trastuzumab, in combination with chemotherapy, such as doxorubicin. However, an open problem in treatment design is to determine the therapeutic regimen that optimally combines these two treatments to yield optimal tumor control. Working with data quantifying temporal changes in tumor volume due to different trastuzumab and doxorubicin treatment protocols in a murine model of human HER2+ breast cancer, we propose a complete framework for model development, calibration, selection, and treatment optimization to find the optimal treatment protocol. Through different assumptions for the drug-tumor interactions, we propose ten different models to characterize the dynamic relationship between tumor volume and drug availability, as well as the drug-drug interaction. Using a Bayesian framework, each of these models are calibrated to the dataset and the model with the highest Bayesian information criterion weight is selected to represent the biological system. The selected model captures the inhibition of trastuzumab due to pre-treatment with doxorubicin, as well as the increase in doxorubicin efficacy due to pre-treatment with trastuzumab. We then apply optimal control theory (OCT) to this model to identify two optimal treatment protocols. In the first optimized protocol, we fix the maximum dosage for doxorubicin and trastuzumab to be the same as the maximum dose delivered experimentally, while trying to minimize tumor burden. Within this constraint, optimal control theory indicates the optimal regimen is to first deliver two doses of trastuzumab on days 35 and 36, followed by two doses of doxorubicin on days 37 and 38. This protocol predicts an additional 45% reduction in tumor burden compared to that achieved with the experimentally delivered regimen. In the second optimized protocol we fix the tumor control to be the same as that obtained experimentally, and attempt to reduce the doxorubicin dose. Within this constraint, the optimal regimen is the same as the first optimized protocol but uses only 43% of the doxorubicin dose used experimentally. This protocol predicts tumor control equivalent to that achieved experimentally. These results strongly suggest the utility of mathematical modeling and optimal control theory for identifying therapeutic regimens maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

We provide an overview on the use of biological assays to calibrate and initialize mechanism-based models of cancer phenomena. Although artificial intelligence methods currently dominate the landscape in computational oncology, mathematical models that seek to explicitly incorporate biological mechanisms into their formalism are of increasing interest. These models can guide experimental design and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of cancer progression. Historically, these models have included a myriad of parameters that have been difficult to quantify in biologically relevant systems, limiting their practical insights. Recently, however, there has been much interest calibrating biologically based models with the quantitative measurements available from (for example) RNA sequencing, time-resolved microscopy, and in vivo imaging. In this contribution, we summarize how a variety of experimental methods quantify tumor characteristics from the molecular to tissue scales and describe how such data can be directly integrated with mechanism-based models to improve predictions of tumor growth and treatment response., (© 2020 The Author(s).)

We develop a general class of thermodynamically consistent, continuum models based on mixture theory with phase effects that describe the behavior of a mass of multiple interacting constituents. The constituents consist of solid species undergoing large elastic deformations and compressible viscous fluids. The fundamental building blocks framing the mixture theories consist of the mass balance law of diffusing species and microscopic (cellular scale) and macroscopic (tissue scale) force balances, as well as energy balance and the entropy production inequality derived from the first and second laws of thermodynamics. A general phase-field framework is developed by closing the system through postulating constitutive equations (i.e., specific forms of free energy and rate of dissipation potentials) to depict the growth of tumors in a microenvironment. A notable feature of this theory is that it contains a unified continuum mechanics framework for addressing the interactions of multiple species evolving in both space and time and involved in biological growth of soft tissues (e.g., tumor cells and nutrients). The formulation also accounts for the regulating roles of the mechanical deformation on the growth of tumors, through a physically and mathematically consistent coupled diffusion and deformation framework. A new algorithm for numerical approximation of the proposed model using mixed finite elements is presented. The results of numerical experiments indicate that the proposed theory captures critical features of avascular tumor growth in the various microenvironment of living tissue, in agreement with the experimental studies in the literature., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Multiparametric imaging is a critical tool in the noninvasive study and assessment of cancer. Imaging methods have evolved over the past several decades to provide quantitative measures of tumor and healthy tissue characteristics related to, for example, cell number, blood volume fraction, blood flow, hypoxia, and metabolism. Mechanistic models of tumor growth also have matured to a point where the incorporation of patient-specific measures could provide clinically relevant predictions of tumor growth and response. In this review, we identify and discuss approaches that use multiparametric imaging data, including diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, and [ 18 F]fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography to initialize and calibrate mechanistic models of tumor growth and response. We focus the discussion on brain and breast cancers; however, we also identify three emerging areas of application in kidney, pancreatic, and lung cancers. We conclude with a discussion of the future directions for incorporating multiparametric imaging data and mechanistic modeling into clinical decision making for patients with cancer.

Introduction: A defining hallmark of cancer is aberrant cell proliferation. Efforts to understand the generative properties of cancer cells span all biological scales: from genetic deviations and alterations of metabolic pathways to physical stresses due to overcrowding, as well as the effects of therapeutics and the immune system. While these factors have long been studied in the laboratory, mathematical and computational techniques are being increasingly applied to help understand and forecast tumor growth and treatment response. Advantages of mathematical modeling of proliferation include the ability to simulate and predict the spatiotemporal development of tumors across multiple experimental scales. Central to proliferation modeling is the incorporation of available biological data and validation with experimental data. Areas covered: We present an overview of past and current mathematical strategies directed at understanding tumor cell proliferation. We identify areas for mathematical development as motivated by available experimental and clinical evidence, with a particular emphasis on emerging, non-invasive imaging technologies. Expert commentary: The data required to legitimize mathematical models are often difficult or (currently) impossible to obtain. We suggest areas for further investigation to establish mathematical models that more effectively utilize available data to make informed predictions on tumor cell proliferation.