Search

Importance: Most research to understand postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), or long COVID, has focused on adults, with less known about this complex condition in children. Research is needed to characterize pediatric PASC to enable studies of underlying mechanisms that will guide future treatment., Objective: To identify the most common prolonged symptoms experienced by children (aged 6 to 17 years) after SARS-CoV-2 infection, how these symptoms differ by age (school-age [6-11 years] vs adolescents [12-17 years]), how they cluster into distinct phenotypes, and what symptoms in combination could be used as an empirically derived index to assist researchers to study the likely presence of PASC., Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter longitudinal observational cohort study with participants recruited from more than 60 US health care and community settings between March 2022 and December 2023, including school-age children and adolescents with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection history., Exposure: SARS-CoV-2 infection., Main Outcomes and Measures: PASC and 89 prolonged symptoms across 9 symptom domains., Results: A total of 898 school-age children (751 with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [referred to as infected] and 147 without [referred to as uninfected]; mean age, 8.6 years; 49% female; 11% were Black or African American, 34% were Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish, and 60% were White) and 4469 adolescents (3109 infected and 1360 uninfected; mean age, 14.8 years; 48% female; 13% were Black or African American, 21% were Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish, and 73% were White) were included. Median time between first infection and symptom survey was 506 days for school-age children and 556 days for adolescents. In models adjusted for sex and race and ethnicity, 14 symptoms in both school-age children and adolescents were more common in those with SARS-CoV-2 infection history compared with those without infection history, with 4 additional symptoms in school-age children only and 3 in adolescents only. These symptoms affected almost every organ system. Combinations of symptoms most associated with infection history were identified to form a PASC research index for each age group; these indices correlated with poorer overall health and quality of life. The index emphasizes neurocognitive, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms in school-age children but change or loss in smell or taste, pain, and fatigue/malaise-related symptoms in adolescents. Clustering analyses identified 4 PASC symptom phenotypes in school-age children and 3 in adolescents., Conclusions and Relevance: This study developed research indices for characterizing PASC in children and adolescents. Symptom patterns were similar but distinguishable between the 2 groups, highlighting the importance of characterizing PASC separately for these age ranges.

Importance: The prevalence, pathophysiology, and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 (post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 [PASC] or "Long COVID") in children and young adults remain unknown. Studies must address the urgent need to define PASC, its mechanisms, and potential treatment targets in children and young adults., Observations: We describe the protocol for the Pediatric Observational Cohort Study of the NIH's REsearching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative. RECOVER-Pediatrics is an observational meta-cohort study of caregiver-child pairs (birth through 17 years) and young adults (18 through 25 years), recruited from more than 100 sites across the US. This report focuses on two of four cohorts that comprise RECOVER-Pediatrics: 1) a de novo RECOVER prospective cohort of children and young adults with and without previous or current infection; and 2) an extant cohort derived from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (n = 10,000). The de novo cohort incorporates three tiers of data collection: 1) remote baseline assessments (Tier 1, n = 6000); 2) longitudinal follow-up for up to 4 years (Tier 2, n = 6000); and 3) a subset of participants, primarily the most severely affected by PASC, who will undergo deep phenotyping to explore PASC pathophysiology (Tier 3, n = 600). Youth enrolled in the ABCD study participate in Tier 1. The pediatric protocol was developed as a collaborative partnership of investigators, patients, researchers, clinicians, community partners, and federal partners, intentionally promoting inclusivity and diversity. The protocol is adaptive to facilitate responses to emerging science., Conclusions and Relevance: RECOVER-Pediatrics seeks to characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term effects of PASC from birth through 25 years old. RECOVER-Pediatrics is designed to elucidate the epidemiology, four-year clinical course, and sociodemographic correlates of pediatric PASC. The data and biosamples will allow examination of mechanistic hypotheses and biomarkers, thus providing insights into potential therapeutic interventions., Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT05172011., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Brett Anderson reported receiving direct support for work not related to RECOVER work/publications from Genentech and the National Institute of Allergy and Immunology. Walter Dehority reported receiving grant support from Merck and participating in research for the Moderna COVID-19 pediatric vaccine trial and the Pfizer Paxlovid trial. Alex Fiks reported receiving support from NJM insurance and personal consulting fees not related to this paper from Rutgers University and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Ashraf Harahsheh reported serving as a scientific advisory board member unrelated to this paper for OP2 DRUGS. Lawrence Kleinman reported serving as an unpaid member of the Board of Directors for the DARTNet Institute, as a principle investigator at Quality Matters, Inc., and as the Vice Chair for the Borough of Metuchen Board of Health. Dr. Kleinman also reported grant support for work not related to RECOVER work/publications from NIH, HRSA, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Dr. Kleinman also reported minority individual stock ownership in Apple Computer, Sanofi SA, Experion, GlaxoSmithKline, Magyar Bank, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, JP Morgan Chase, and Amgen Inc. Torri Metz reported participating as a Principle Investigator in the medical advisory board for the planning of a Pfizer clinical trial of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy. She is also a principle investigator for a Pfizer study evaluating the pharmacokinetics of Paxlovid in pregnant people with COVID-19. Joshua Milner reported serving as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Blueprint Medicines, in a capacity unrelated to RECOVER work/publications. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Gross et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Less than 5% of children who report penicillin allergy have clinically pertinent type 1 immunoglobulin E mediated hypersensitivity reaction by using direct oral amoxicillin challenge. Several pathways have been developed to delabel penicillin allergy by using direct oral amoxicillin challenge, mostly in the outpatient settings, but there is relative scarcity on published outcomes of these pathways, especially in the inpatient pediatric settings. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of an institutionally derived inpatient penicillin allergy screening tool. Methods: Patients were stratified into three penicillin allergy risk categories by using an institutional screening questionnaire. Patients with a no-risk status were delabeled without challenge testing. Patients with low-risk status underwent direct graded oral amoxicillin challenge and delabeled based on their response. Patients with high-risk status were referred to allergy service. Results: Ninety-two patients were identified with penicillin allergy. Forty of the 92 patients (43%) were screened. Of the 40 patients screened, 6 (15%) were identified as no risk, 28 (70%) were identified as low risk, and 6 (15%) were identified as high risk. Twenty-four of the 28 patients at low risk (86%) were eligible for direct amoxicillin oral challenge. Seventeen of the 24 (71%) consented to oral challenge but only 12 (71%) underwent direct amoxicillin oral challenge. Eleven of the 12 who underwent oral challenge (92%) were successfully delabeled. Five of the six patients at no risk (83%) were successfully delabeled. Three of the six patients at high risk (50%) were referred for further allergy evaluation. Overall, 16 of the 40 patients screened (40%) were successfully delabeled. Conclusion: In this small pediatric inpatient study, our institutional risk stratification screening tool identified patients at low risk for penicillin allergy and direct graded oral amoxicillin challenge was safely administered to delabel penicillin allergy in these patients.Clinical trial NCT05020327, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used successfully to support adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related cardiac or respiratory failure refractory to conventional therapies. Comprehensive reports of children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2-related ECMO support for conditions, including multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and acute COVID-19, are needed., Design: Case series of patients from the Overcoming COVID-19 public health surveillance registry., Setting: Sixty-three hospitals in 32 U.S. states reporting to the registry between March 15, 2020, and December 31, 2021., Patients: Patients less than 21 years admitted to the ICU meeting Centers for Disease Control criteria for MIS-C or acute COVID-19., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: The final cohort included 2,733 patients with MIS-C ( n = 1,530; 37 [2.4%] requiring ECMO) or acute COVID-19 ( n = 1,203; 71 [5.9%] requiring ECMO). ECMO patients in both groups were older than those without ECMO support (MIS-C median 15.4 vs 9.9 yr; acute COVID-19 median 15.3 vs 13.6 yr). The body mass index percentile was similar in the MIS-C ECMO versus no ECMO groups (89.9 vs 85.8; p = 0.22) but higher in the COVID-19 ECMO versus no ECMO groups (98.3 vs 96.5; p = 0.03). Patients on ECMO with MIS-C versus COVID-19 were supported more often with venoarterial ECMO (92% vs 41%) for primary cardiac indications (87% vs 23%), had ECMO initiated earlier (median 1 vs 5 d from hospitalization), shorter ECMO courses (median 3.9 vs 14 d), shorter hospital length of stay (median 20 vs 52 d), lower in-hospital mortality (27% vs 37%), and less major morbidity at discharge in survivors (new tracheostomy, oxygen or mechanical ventilation need or neurologic deficit; 0% vs 11%, 0% vs 20%, and 8% vs 15%, respectively). Most patients with MIS-C requiring ECMO support (87%) were admitted during the pre-Delta (variant B.1.617.2) period, while most patients with acute COVID-19 requiring ECMO support (70%) were admitted during the Delta variant period., Conclusions: ECMO support for SARS-CoV-2-related critical illness was uncommon, but type, initiation, and duration of ECMO use in MIS-C and acute COVID-19 were markedly different. Like pre-pandemic pediatric ECMO cohorts, most patients survived to hospital discharge., Competing Interests: Dr. Bembea’s institution received funding from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS106292) and Grifols Investigator Sponsored Research Grant. Drs. Bembea, Heidemann, Zinter, and Randolph received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Thiagarjan’s institution received funding from the U.S. Department of Defense (Peer Reviewed Medical Research Project Clinical Trial Award No. W81XWH2210301 Trial of Indication-based Transfusion of Red blood cells in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation); he received funding from Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Drs. Young’s, McCadden’s, Newhams’s, Kucuak’s, Mack’s, Fitzgerald’s, Rowan’s, Maddux’s, Kolmar’s, Heidemann’s, Schwartz’s, Kong’s, Crandall’s, Singh’s, Schuster’s, Hall’s, Wellnitz’s, Maamari’s, Gaspers’s, Nofziger’s, Cullimore’s, Halasa’s, McLaughlin’s, Pannaraj’s, Cvijanovich’s, Coates’s, Horwitz’s, Hobbs’s, Dapul’s, and Randolph’s institutions received funding from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Dr. McCadden disclosed work for hire. Dr. Newhams’ institution received funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Drs. Fitzgerald’s, Kong’s, Cullimore’s, Cvijanovich’s, and Randolph’s institutions received funding from the NIH. Dr. Rowan’s institution received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K23HL150244). Dr. Maddux’s institution received funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD096018). Drs. Irby, Crandall, Singh, Wellnitz, Nofziger, Bradford, McLaughlin, Coates, Hobbs, and Zambrano received support for article research from the CDC. Dr. Schuster’s institution received funding from Merck. Dr. Hall received funding from Abbvie, Kiadis, and the American Board of Pediatrics. Dr. Wellnitz’s institution received funding from the University of Pennsylvania (prime sponsor NIH) and the University of Nebraska (prime sponsor Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response). Dr. Gaspers received funding from Abbott Laboratories. Dr. Munoz’s institution received funding from Boston’s Children’s Hospital; he received funding from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Dr. Halasa’s institution received funding from Sanofi. Dr. McLaughlin received funding from expert witness fees from two entities. Dr. Pannaraj’s institution received funding from AstraZeneca and Pfizer. Dr. Coates’ institution received funding from the NHLBI and the American Lung Association; she received funding from Sobi. Drs. Hobbs and Randolph received funding from UpToDate. Dr. Hobbs received funding from Dynamed.com; she disclosed that she was a speaker for Biomerieux 2021–2022. Drs. Zambrano and Campbell disclosed government work. Dr. Randolph had full access to all the data in the investigation and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Sepsis remains the leading cause of childhood mortality worldwide. The evolving definition of pediatric sepsis is extrapolated from adult studies. Although lacking formal validation in the pediatric population, this working definition has historically proven its clinical utility. Prompt identification of pediatric sepsis is challenging as clinical picture is often variable. Timely intervention is crucial for optimal outcome, thus biomarkers are utilized to aid in immediate, yet judicious, diagnosis of sepsis. Over time, their use in sepsis has expanded with discovery of newer biomarkers that include genomic bio-signatures. Despite recent scientific advances, there is no biomarker that can accurately diagnose sepsis. Furthermore, older biomarkers are readily available in most institutions while newer biomarkers are not. Hence, the latter's clinical value in pediatric sepsis remains theoretical. Albeit promising, scarce data on newer biomarkers have been extracted from research settings making their clinical value unclear. As interest in newer biomarkers continue to proliferate despite their ambiguous clinical use, the literature on older biomarkers in clinical settings continue to diminish. Thus, revisiting the evolving value of these earliest biomarkers in optimizing pediatric sepsis diagnosis is warranted. This review focuses on the four most readily available biomarkers to bedside clinicians in diagnosing pediatric sepsis. IMPACT: The definition of pediatric sepsis remains an extrapolation from adult studies. Older biomarkers that include C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin, and lactate are the most readily available biomarkers in most pediatric institutions to aid in the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis. Older biomarkers, although in varying levels of reliability, remain to be useful clinical adjuncts in the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis if used in the appropriate clinical context. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin are more sensitive and specific among these older biomarkers in diagnosing pediatric sepsis although evidence varies in different age groups and clinical scenarios., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.)

A three-year-old boy presented with fever, maculopapular rash involving palms and soles, and hyponatremia two weeks following a tick bite. Empiric doxycycline that he was on was discontinued following negative initial rickettsial serology based on the non-endemicity of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) in Northeast Ohio. He demonstrated high inflammatory markers and met the criteria for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). With a working diagnosis of macrophage activation syndrome secondary to presumed systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (soJIA), he received HLH-directed therapy. Rising antibody titers in convalescent sera established the diagnosis of RMSF. The patient recovered completely with HLH directed therapy and re-institution of doxycycline. This is the first pediatric case report of Rickettsia rickettsii induced HLH demonstrating a favorable outcome despite modified therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The use of 16S rRNA sequencing in culture-negative infections has improved identification of bacterial pathogens in select scenarios, but its clinical impact requires further elucidation, especially in the pediatric population. This retrospective study aims to determine the clinical utility of 16S rRNA sequencing on the clinical management of pediatric culture-negative infections in our institution. Significant clinical utility was identified in 30 (40.5%) of 74 clinical samples ( p < 0.0001). Of all specimens, pulmonary samples yielded the most clinical utility ( n = 9, 30%), followed equally by joint fluid ( n = 6, 20%) and bone ( n = 6, 20%), with no difference between fluid and fresh tissue specimens ( p = 0.346). Although the difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.4111), the overall use of broad-spectrum coverage was decreased. The median number of antibiotics was decreased from two to one ( p < 0.0001) based on 16S rRNA sequencing results. The results suggest that 16S rRNA sequencing has a significant impact on decreasing the number of antibiotics used in the treatment of pediatric culture-negative infections. 16S rRNA sequencing performed on pulmonary specimens has the highest likelihood of identifying a pathogen compared to other specimen types. Additional cost-benefit analysis needs to be completed to further determine clinical benefit.