Search

Background Intensive chemotherapy has markedly improved the survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL). Evaluation of late effects and analysis of factors contributing to their occurrence has become of major importance. Second neoplasm (SN) belongs to the most severe late events. Procedure We report the incidence of SN which occurred in patients recruited in EORTC trial 58881 for children with ALL or LL. The front-line treatment regimen was adapted from the BFM protocol, but did not include cranial radiotherapy, even in patients with initial involvement of the central nervous system. A total of 2,216 patients were recruited, of whom 2,136 achieved complete remission (CR). Results At a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 22 (1%) patients developed a SN: 20 during or after completion of front-line therapy and 2 in second CR, after relapse treatment including haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Ten patients developed acute myeloblastic leukaemia. Only one SN, a glioblastoma, was a brain tumour. Other SN were: two Hodgkin lymphomas, one non-Hodgkin lymphoma, two thyroid cancers, one osteosarcoma, two soft tissue sarcomas, one Ewing sarcoma, one cutaneous histiocytosis and one peritoneal carcinomatosis. The cumulative incidences of SN at 5, 8 and 13 years after registration were 0.8% (SE 0.2%), 1.0% (SE 0.2%) and 3.0% (SE 1.9%), respectively. Conclusion The overall incidence rate of SN is comparable to that reported previously. In spite of short follow-up time, the low incidence of brain tumours might be related to the omission of cranial radiotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;57:119–125. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Background: Despite recent improvements, many patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) ultimately succumb to their disease. Therefore, improvements in front-line chemotherapy of aggressive NHL are needed. Gemcitabine is active in lymphoma. Methods: We performed a randomized phase II trial of the addition of gemcitabine to standard CHOP chemotherapy with or without rituximab [(R)CHOP]. The trial was also designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in this combination. Patients with previously untreated aggressive NHL were randomized to receive either eight cycles of (R)CHOP given every 3 wk or (R)CHOP combined with gemcitabine [Gem-(R)CHOP]. Results: Twentyfive patients were enrolled in the trial before early closure. Twelve were randomized to Gem-(R)CHOP and 13 to (R)CHOP. MTD of gemcitabine was 800 mgUm 2 given on days 1 and 8; dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic. Five patients (42%) treated with Gem-(R)CHOP achieved complete response in comparison with 10 (77%) treated with (R)CHOP. Median time to treatment failure was 1.5 yr for Gem-(R)CHOP and 3.1 yr for (R)CHOP. Three patients receiving Gem-(R)CHOP had serious pulmonary toxicity, when compared to none receiving (R)CHOP. One patient died of pneumonitis. Conclusions: In this group of patients, addition of gemcitabine did not seem to improve outcomes. Gem-(R)CHOP in previously untreated patients with aggressive NHL occasionally results in severe, potentially fatal, pulmonary toxicity.

The Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force has represented the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) over the last two decades and has received worldwide acceptance and the highest respect. The group has been able to bring together the world's experts in this field to try to solve the basic problems associated with primary lymphomas of the skin and to create a productive scientific research basis. The definition and the classification of the disease per se has been a major controversial problem and the development of an EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphoma has been one of the main goals of the group. The purpose of this paper is to highlight and to provide a historical perspective regarding the contribution of the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Group to the development of consensus guidelines for securing uniform diagnosis, classification and management of the heterogeneous group of primary cutaneous lymphomas. Some future perspectives and strategies of the group are also presented.

Purpose To compare low-dose decitabine to best supportive care (BSC) in higher-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) age 60 years or older and ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Two-hundred thirty-three patients (median age, 70 years; range, 60 to 90 years) were enrolled; 53% had poor-risk cytogenetics, and the median MDS duration at random assignment was 3 months. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Decitabine (15 mg/m2) was given intravenously over 4 hours three times a day for 3 days in 6-week cycles. Results OS prolongation with decitabine versus BSC was not statistically significant (median OS, 10.1 v 8.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.17; two-sided, log-rank P = .38). Progression-free survival (PFS), but not acute myeloid leukemia (AML) –free survival (AMLFS), was significantly prolonged with decitabine versus BSC (median PFS, 6.6 v 3.0 months, respectively; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.88; P = .004; median AMLFS, 8.8 v 6.1 months, respectively; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.12; P = .24). AML transformation was significantly (P = .036) reduced at 1 year (from 33% with BSC to 22% with decitabine). Multivariate analyses indicated that patients with short MDS duration had worse outcomes. Best responses with decitabine versus BSC, respectively, were as follows: complete response (13% v 0%), partial response (6% v 0%), hematologic improvement (15% v 2%), stable disease (14% v 22%), progressive disease (29% v 68%), hypoplasia (14% v 0%), and inevaluable (8% v 8%). Grade 3 to 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 25% of patients on decitabine versus 7% of patients on BSC; grade 3 to 4 infections occurred in 57% and 52% of patients on decitabine and BSC, respectively. Decitabine treatment was associated with improvements in patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) parameters. Conclusion Decitabine administered in 6-week cycles is active in older patients with higher-risk MDS, resulting in improvements of OS and AMLFS (nonsignificant), of PFS and AML transformation (significant), and of QOL. Short MDS duration was an independent adverse prognosticator.

Despite recent improvements, many patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) ultimately succumb to their disease. Therefore, improvements in front-line chemotherapy of aggressive NHL are needed. Gemcitabine is active in lymphoma.We performed a randomized phase II trial of the addition of gemcitabine to standard CHOP chemotherapy with or without rituximab [(R)CHOP]. The trial was also designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in this combination. Patients with previously untreated aggressive NHL were randomized to receive either eight cycles of (R)CHOP given every 3 wk or (R)CHOP combined with gemcitabine [Gem-(R)CHOP].Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the trial before early closure. Twelve were randomized to Gem-(R)CHOP and 13 to (R)CHOP. MTD of gemcitabine was 800 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 8; dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic. Five patients (42%) treated with Gem-(R)CHOP achieved complete response in comparison with 10 (77%) treated with (R)CHOP. Median time to treatment failure was 1.5 yr for Gem-(R)CHOP and 3.1 yr for (R)CHOP. Three patients receiving Gem-(R)CHOP had serious pulmonary toxicity, when compared to none receiving (R)CHOP. One patient died of pneumonitis.In this group of patients, addition of gemcitabine did not seem to improve outcomes. Gem-(R)CHOP in previously untreated patients with aggressive NHL occasionally results in severe, potentially fatal, pulmonary toxicity.

Contains fulltext : 89504.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) This study compared two schedules of low-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) as induction monotherapy for untreated acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, to identify the more promising regimen for further study. Patients were randomized to receive either best supportive care or a course of GO according to one of two schedules: 3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 3 and 5 (arm A), or GO 6 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 3 mg/m(2) on day 8 (arm B). Primary endpoint was the rate of disease non-progression (DnP), defined as the proportion of patients either achieving a response or maintaining a stable disease following GO induction in each arm. Fifty-six patients were randomized in the two GO arms (A, n = 29; B, n = 27). The rate of DnP was 38% [90% confidence interval (CI), 23-55] in arm A, and 63% (90% CI, 45-78) in arm B. Peripheral cytopenias were the most common adverse events for both regimens. The all-cause early mortality rate was 14% in arm A and 11% in arm B. The day 1 + 8 schedule, which was associated with the highest rate of DnP, met the statistical criteria to be selected as the preferred regimen for phase III comparison with best supportive care. 01 mei 2010

Purpose To compare the antitumor efficacy of three different anthracyclines in combination with cytarabine and etoposide in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 2,157 patients (age range, 15 to 60 years) to receive intensive induction-consolidation chemotherapy containing either daunorubicin, idarubicin, or mitoxantrone. After achieving complete remission (CR), patients were assigned to undergo either allogeneic or autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT), depending on the availability of a sibling donor. Results The overall CR rate (69%) was similar in the three groups. Autologous SCT was performed in 37% of cases in the daunorubicin arm versus only 29% and 31% in mitoxantrone and idarubicin, respectively (P < .001). However, the disease-free survival (DFS) and survival from CR were significantly shorter in the daunorubicin arm: the 5-year DFS was 29% versus 37% and 37% in mitoxantrone and idarubicin, respectively. The proportion of patients who underwent allogeneic SCT (22%) was equivalent in the three treatment groups, and the outcome was similar as well: the 5-year overall survival rates were 34%, 34%, and 31%, respectively. Conclusion In adult patients with AML who do not receive an allogeneic SCT, the use of mitoxantrone or idarubicin instead of daunorubicin enhances the long-term efficacy of chemotherapy.

From June 1989 through to November 1998, 121 children with newly diagnosed T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) were included in the EORTC 58881 trial conducted by the Children's Leukaemia Group. The therapy regimen was based on a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster protocol, for a total duration of 24 months. Cranial irradiation, prophylactic cranial and local, was omitted, even for patients with central nervous involvement at diagnosis. In total, 119 patients were evaluable. The median follow-up was 6.7 years. The overall event-free survival (EFS) rate at 6 years was 77.5% (standard error (SE)=4%). Median time of relapse was 1 year after complete remission (range 0.2-5.9 years). Only two (1.8%) patients had an isolated central nervous system relapse. For patients with complete response (n=16) to the 7-day prephase, the EFS rate at 6 years was 100% versus 14% (P

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Continuous ligand depletion of endocrine responsive tumours may enhance resistance to therapy. Intermittent treatment with tamoxifen (T) was considered to mimic (incomplete) ligand depletion and reintroduction. Furthermore it was postulated that alternating tamoxifen with a non-cross resistant endocrine modality could (further) postpone hormone resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who did not progress after 4 months of first line T therapy were randomised to continue T (40 mg daily) or to 2 monthly intermittent T or intermittent/alternated T and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, 300 mg daily). At progression during break or during MPA, T should be reintroduced. Endpoints of the study were progression free survival (PFS), time to resistance to tamoxifen and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 593 registered patients, 276 were randomised. After 8 years follow-up the median PFS for continuous T, intermittent T and intermittent/alternated T and MPA was 11.0 (8.1-15.2), 8.0 (6.2-12.4) and 10.8 (7.1-16.7) months, respectively (NS). Resistance to tamoxifen was established only in 84%, 70% and 55% of patients in the three treatment arms, respectively. The median times from randomisation to resistance to tamoxifen were 12.5 (9.1-21.1), 13.2 (8.8-19.8) and 24.0 (16.9-60.9) months, respectively (p

Summary Background Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy can improve overall survival and reduce the incidence of distant metastases for patients with advanced colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether regional chemotherapy (given by intraperitoneal or intraportal methods) combined with systemic chemotherapy was more effective than was systemic chemotherapy alone in terms of survival and recurrence for patients with stage II–III colorectal cancer. The study also compared systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid with that of fluorouracil and levamisole. Methods During surgery, 753 patients with stage II–III colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to systemic chemotherapy alone (379 with fluorouracil and folinic acid, and 374 with fluorouracil and levamisole), and 748 to postoperative regional chemotherapy with fluorouracil followed by systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid (n=368) or with fluorouracil and levamisole (n=380). Regional chemotherapy was given intraperitoneally (n=415) or intraportally (n=235) according to institution. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints were 5-year disease-free survival and toxic effects. Analyses were by intention to treat. Findings Median follow-up was 6·8 years (range 0·0–10·1). 5-year overall survival was 72·3% (95% CI 69·0–75·6) for patients assigned regional and systemic chemotherapy, compared with 72·0% (68·7–75·3) for those assigned systemic chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·97 [0·81–1·15], p=0·69). 5-year overall survival for all patients assigned fluorouracil and levamisole was 72·0% (68·7–75·2) compared with 72·3% (69·0–75·6) for all those assigned fluorouracil and folinic acid (HR 0·98 [0·82–1·17], p=0·81). The hazard ratios for 5-year disease-free survival were 0·94 (0·80–1·10) for regional versus non-regional treatment, and 0·92 (0·79–1·08) for all fluorouracil and levamisole versus fluorouracil and folinic acid. Grade 3–4 toxic effects were low in all groups. Interpretation Fluorouracil-based regional chemotherapy adds no further benefit to that obtained with systemic chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Contains fulltext : 47837.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) The therapeutic activity and toxicity profile of gemtuzumab ozogamicin were assessed in 40 patients >60 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were not considered eligible for conventional chemotherapy because of advanced age or poor performance status. The drug was administered at the dose of 9 mg/m2 as a single 2-h i.v. infusion on days 1 and 15. Patients who achieved a complete remission (CR/CRp) were to receive a consolidation with two additional injections of the immunotoxin at the same dose. The overall CR/CRp rate was 17% (95% CI, 8-32%). The CR/CRp rate in patients 61-75 years old was 33% (6/18), and 5% (1/22) in patients older than 75 years. Induction death occurred in seven patients (17%), all aged above 75 years. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients aged 61-75 years than in older individuals (P=0.05), and in CD33+ cases than in CD33- cases (P=0.05). We conclude that the dose/schedule of gemtuzumab ozogamicin used in this trial is too toxic in the age group over 75 years. For these patients, additional studies with reduced doses of the immunotoxin are warranted.

Abstract 791 The AML-12 randomized phase III trial of the EORTC and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups assessed the efficacy and toxicity of HD-AraC (3 g/m2/12 hrs for 4 days) combined with daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm for 3 days) and etoposide (50 mg/sqm for 5 days) vs SD-AraC (100 mg/sqm for 10 days) combined with the same drugs. Patients (pts) in complete remission (CR) received consolidation consisting of AraC (500 mg/sqm/12 hrs for 6 days) and daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm for 3 days). Subsequently an allogeneic (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) was planned according to donor availability, cytogenetics and age. A 2nd randomization was performed after consolidation in pts without a donor: auto-SCT followed or not by low dose IL-2 (4-8 × 106 IU s.c. for 5 days per month) during one year. A total of 577 patients were required to be randomized for the 2nd question in order to reach 255 events (relapses or deaths) which would allow to detect a 11.5% increase in the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) from 50% to 61.5% corresponding to hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70 (2-sided alpha=5%, statistical power=80%). Randomization was performed centrally; the 2nd randomization was stratified for induction treatment, cytogenetic/molecular genetic group, number of courses to reach CR, auto-SCT planned (No/Yes) and center. Intent-to-treat analysis was done. From 9/1999 till 1/2008, 2005 previously untreated AML pts (APL excluded), age Disclosures: Muus: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract 97 Introduction Early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is highly curable with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, long term toxicities due to radiotherapy, mainly secondary tumors and cardiovascular events, are altering the outcome. FDG-PET has emerged as a potential new tool to early select good prognosis patients after a few cycles of chemotherapy. We use it as an experimental tool to adapt therapy in the current trial. Patients and methods All patients with a stage I or II supra-diaphragmatic cHL, between 15 and 70 years-old, are eligible for the study and stratified according to GELA/EORTC criteria. Unfavorable (U) prognostic factors included patients with: CSII ≥ 4 nodal areas or age ≥ 50 yrs or MT ratio ≥ 0.35 or ESR ' 50 (without B-symptoms) or ESR ≥ 30 (with B-symptoms). All others are considered favorable (F). In the F group, the standard treatment is ABVDx3 and 30Gy involved-node radiotherapy (IN-RT); the interim FDG-PET scan after 2 cycles is made solely for sake of comparison with the experimental arm but will not affect treatment. The experimental arm consist of ABVDx2 followed by an FDG-PET: if the FDG-PET is negative, patients receive 2 additional cycles of ABVD and no radiotherapy. If the FDG-PET is positive, patients receive BEACOPPesc x2 and 30 Gy IN-RT. In the U group, the same principles are used, the standard treatment is ABVDx4 and 30Gy IN-RT; an FDG-PET is performed for all patients after cycle 2 with no modification of treatment. The experimental arm is ABVDx2 followed by an FDG-PET: if the FDG-PET is negative, patients receive 4 additional cycles of ABVD and no radiotherapy. If the FDG-PET is positive, patients receive BEACOPPesc x2 and 30 Gy IN-RT. Results The trial started in December 2006 and at the end of July 2009, 1097 patients were included. A total of 530 patients have been entered during the last year. The main patients characteristics are as follows: median age 31 years-old (range 15-70), stage I: 16%, stage II: 84%. Thirty-nine % of the patients are in the F group and 61% in the U group. A baseline FDG-PET is not mandatory in the trial but highly recommended; it is available for 93% of patients entered with an improvement over time (from 88% during the first year of accrual to 96% during the last year). A central FDG-PET review is performed after cycle 2 by a panel of 6 nuclear medicine experts according to Juweid's criteria (J Clin Oncol 2007;25,571).The agreement between experts is good with a k=0.63 (95% CI 0.58-0.64) and 85% agreement (95% CI 83-87%), p=0.0008 (J Clin Oncol 2009;27;2739). On the first 485 cases centrally reviewed, a difference of interpretation between the local site reader and the central review panel is observed in 8% of the cases, in 58% of which PET after 2 cycles result was altered from “negative” to “positive”. Results of FDG-PET are available for the first 894 included patients. In the F group (355 patients), 14% are positive and 86% are negative. In the U group (539 patients), 24% are positive and 76% negative. Conclusion FDG-PET treatment adaptation is feasible in a large intergroup randomized trial and a baseline FDG-PET was shown to be available for most and recently all included patients. A centralized FDG-PET is feasible within 72 hours with an excellent agreement between involved experts and a low level of discrepancy with local nuclear physician Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background. In 2005 we analyzed the results of a prospective randomized phase III intergroup trial evaluating the role of rituximab (R) both in remission induction and maintenance treatment of 465 relapsed/resistant follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. Major conclusions were that addition of R to CHOP induction yielded an increased ORR and CR rate, and that R maintenance strongly improved median progression free survival (PFS), both after induction with CHOP and R-CHOP, and overall survival (OS (van Oers et al Blood2006;108:3295). At that time the median follow for the maintenance phase was 33 months. Now we report the long-term outcome of maintenance treatment, with a median follow up of 6 years from start of maintenance. Study design. Patients with stages III or IV FL at initial diagnosis and relapsed after or resistant to a maximum of two non-anthracycline containing systemic chemotherapy regimens, were randomized to remission induction with either 6 cycles of standard CHOP (once every 3 weeks) or CHOP + R (375 mg/m2 at day 1 of each cycle of CHOP). Those with a complete or partial remission after 6 cycles of therapy underwent a second randomization to no further treatment (observation) or maintenance treatment with R (375 mg/m2 once every 3 months) until relapse or for a maximum period of two years. Results. 465 patients were randomized to induction with either CHOP (231) or R-CHOP (234). As reported, CHOP and R-CHOP induction yielded similar partial response rates (57% vs.56%), but significantly different CR rates (16% and 29%; p=0.0001). 334 patients were randomized to either R maintenance treatment (167) or observation (167). R maintenance resulted in a highly significant improvement of PFS: median 3.7 years versus 1.3 years in the observation arm (p Conclusion. With long term follow-up we confirm the superior PFS with R maintenance. The improvement of OS did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to the abundant use of R in post-protocol salvage treatment.

Background: An overview of trials dating back to the ‘70s and ‘80s has shown that addition of vincristine (VCR)+prednisone/prednisolone pulses to continuation therapy of childhood ALL, i.e. 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) + methotrexate (MTX), improved disease-free survival (DFS) (Lancet, 1996). However, a recent randomized intergroup trial (IGT) has shown that, when given to intermediate risk (age=6 yrs or WBC>20×109/L) patients (pts) treated according to the BFM protocol, VCR+dexamethasone (DEX) pulses in continuation therapy failed to improve DFS and overall survival (Lancet, 2007). Methods: In 12/1998, EORTC CLG started the randomized phase III 58951 trial addressing 3 questions: R1) the value of DEX vs PRED in induction; R2) the value of prolonged (24 injections) vs conventional (12 injections) duration of L-asparaginase (ASPA) courses during consolidation and late intensification; R3) for average risk (AR) pts only: the value of 6 (VCR+corticosteroid) pulses every 10 weeks during continuation therapy. The corticoid of the pulses was that assigned to the patient at R1: DEX (6 mg/sm/d) or prednisolone (PRED) (60 mg/sm/d) during 7 days. AR pts were defined by being neither low risk (hyperploidy > 50 or DNI>1.16, and WBC Results: Between 6.1999 and 11.2004, 411 pts, ALL (N=384) and NHL (N=27), were randomized for the pulse question. In the Pulses group, 101 vs 101 pts were randomized for PRED vs DEX. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, there were 19 vs 34 DFS events for the Pulses vs No Pulses comparison: BM (10 vs 16), CNS only (1 vs 4), other isolated (2 vs 3), BM+CNS (2 vs 5), BM+other (4 vs 4), death in CR (0 vs 2). The 6-year DFS rate from randomization was 90.6% (SE 2.1%) in the Pulses group and 82.8% (SE 2.8%) in the No Pulses group (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.94, 2-sided logrank p=0.027). The impact of pulses on DFS was similar in the PRED group (HR=0.56) and the DEX group (HR=0.59). In girls the treatment difference seemed to be more pronounced (HR=0.25, 99% CI 0.04–1.25; p=0.015) than in boys (HR=0.71, 99% CI 0.30–1.66; p=0.30), and also in those having been randomized to receive conventional duration of ASPA courses (HR=0.46, 99% CI 0.18–1.19; p=0.03) than in prolonged ASPA arm (HR=0.87, 99% CI 0.23–3.29; p=0.78). Grade 3–4 hepatic toxicity was lower in the Pulses group (30% vs 40%); incidence of grade 2–3 osteonecrosis was 4.4% (Pulses) vs 2% (No Pulses) and pancreatitis rate was 4.9% (Pulses) vs 2.9% (No Pulses). Conclusion: VCR+corticosteroid pulses, at long follow-up (median=6.3 yrs), significantly improved the DFS, particularly in pts having received conventional duration of ASPA. Pulses did not increase toxic effects. In future, for AR pts treated according to the BFM protocol, pulses should become a standard component of therapy.

Treatment of AML in the elderly remains challenging. In particular, few therapeutic options exist for patients (pts) who are not considered medically fit for intensive chemotherapy. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, has demonstrated single agent efficacy in older patients with relapsed AML. In a previous trial we reported a complete response rate of 17% when the licensed dose/schedule of GO was used as frontline monotherapy for older unfit pts with AML, but excess hematologic and liver toxicity suggested changes in both dosing and scheduling to improve feasibility. The AML-19 study was designed as a sequential phase II–III trial in pts of age 61 or over with untreated AML, who could not be considered candidates for, or must have declined, conventional intensive chemotherapy. The primary objective of the phase II study was to investigate whether any of two different schedules of lower dose GO monotherapy (total delivered dose 9 mg/m2 in 2 or 3 fractions over one week) is sufficiently effective and tolerable frontline therapy to continue phase III comparison with best supportive care (BSC). Pts had to have adequate renal and hepatic function, and the WBC count had to be less than 30,000/cmm at the time of registration. Two-thirds of the pts were randomly assigned to receive a single induction course of either GO 3 mg/m2 iv on days 1, 3 and 5 (arm A), or GO 6 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and 3 mg/m2 on day 8 (arm B); the remaining third was assigned to the BSC arm. Randomization was stratified by age, performance status (PS), initial WBC, CD33 expression on marrow blasts, and Institution. Pts with no evidence of objective disease progression were eligible to receive continuation treatment with monthly outpatient infusions of GO at 2 mg/m2 for a maximum of 8 months. Primary end-point of the phase II study was clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as the number of pts either achieving a remission (CR, CRp, PR) or maintaining a stable disease (SD) in each experimental arm. The arm associated with the highest CBR would be selected for phase III assessment, providing that it is at least 48% (Simon design). Between 06/2004 and 12/2006, 56 pts were randomized in the two experimental arms (arm A 29; arm B 27). The two arms were comparable in terms of age (arm A: median 77 yrs; arm B: median 78 yrs), PS >2 (arm A: 7%; arm B: 4%), secondary AML (arm A: 45%; arm B: 37%), and CD33 expression on ≥20% marrow blasts (arm A: 86%; arm B: 85%). In arm A, 6 pts achieved CR, 2 PR, and 3 maintained SD for an overall CBR of 38% (90% CI, 23%–55%); in arm B, 5 pts achieved CR, 1 CRp, and 11 maintained SD for an overall CBR of 63% (90% CI, 45%–78%). Most toxicities were

The AML-12 randomized phase III trial of EORTC-LG and GIMEMA assessed the efficacy and toxicity of HD-AraC (3 g/m2/12 hrs for 4 days) combined with daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm for 3 days) and etoposide (50 mg/sqm for 5 days) vs SD-AraC (100 mg/sqm for 10 days) with the same drugs. Patients (pts) in complete remission (CR) received consolidation consisting of AraC (500 mg/sqm/12 hrs for 6 days) and daunorubicin. Subsequently an allogeneic (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) was planned according to donor availability and age. A 2nd randomization was performed after CR in pts without a donor: auto-SCT followed or not by low dose IL-2. The trial was powered to detect an 8% difference in the 5-yr survival rate; secondary endpoints were response to induction, DFS, toxicity. Randomization was performed centrally; the 1st randomization was stratified for age, performance status, WBC and center. Intent-to-treat analysis was done. From 9/1999 till 1/2008, 2005 previously untreated AML pts (APL excluded), age

Despite recent advances many patients with aggressive NHL succumb to their disease and improvements in front-line chemotherapy are still needed. Gemcitabine is active in lymphoma. We embarked on a randomized phase II trial to determine the efficacy, feasibility and toxicity of the addition of gemcitabine to standard front-line chemotherapy. The trial consisted of two parts. The first part was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose of gemcitabine and the second to determine the response rate, feasibility and toxicity of the treatment. Patients, 18–70 years old, with stage II–IV previously untreated B-large cell, follicular grade 3, anaplastic large cell or peripheral T cell lymphoma were eligible. They were randomized to receive either 8 cycles of standard CHOP given every 3 weeks or the same treatment combined with gemcitabine (Gem-CHOP). In the second part of the trial patients with B-NHL also received 8 cycles of rituximab (R). The starting dose of gemcitabine was 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Dose escalation to 1000 and 1250 mg/m2 and reduction to 800 mg/m2 on day 1 only were foreseen. Twenty-five patients, 7 with T and 18 with B-NHL, were enrolled in the trial; 15 in the dose-finding part and 10 in the second part before early closure due to low accrual. Twelve received Gem-(R) CHOP and 13 (R)CHOP. Maximal tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 800 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8; dose limiting toxicity was hematologic. Five patients (42%) treated with Gem-(R)CHOP achieved CR in comparison to 10 (77%) treated with (R)CHOP. Three out of 4 patients with T-NHL responded to Gem-CHOP and 2 out of 3 to CHOP. Median time to treatment failure was 1.49 years for the Gem-(R)CHOP arm and 3.13 years for the (R)CHOP arm. Four patients receiving Gem-(R)CHOP had serious pulmonary toxicity, as compared to none receiving (R)CHOP. One patient died of severe pneumonitis. The apparently immunologically mediated pulmonary toxicity prompted us to add in the second part of the trial a three-day course of prednisone starting on day 8, together with the second gemcitabine dose. After this change, no additional cases of pulmonary toxicity were seen. The combination of gemcitabine with standard (R)CHOP results in significant but acceptable hematologic toxicity. Maximal tolerated dose of gemcitabine is 800 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. In this small group of patients, addition of gemcitabine did not seem to improve outcomes. The use of gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with aggressive NHL results occasionally in severe, potentially fatal, pulmonary toxicity. Therefore, further exploration of this combination does not seem to be warranted.

Background: there is some biologic and clinical evidence that DEX is more efficient than PRED at similarly anti-inflammatory doses in the treatment of childhood ALL. Previous trials have called for PRED doses (40 mg/sm/d) lower than those of PRED traditionally used in EORTC trials. In order to check whether the claimed superiority of DEX might be dose-dependent, we conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing DEX (6 mg/sm/d) to PRED (60 mg/sm/d) (conventional dose) in induction therapy. Methods: the trial was opened in 12/1998 to all newly diagnosed children with ALL up to 18 y. of age. After the opening of the Interfant trial in 1999, children Results: between 12/1998 and 2/2008, a total of 1853 ALL pts were randomized; as of 2/2008, 1703 pts were evaluable for EFS analysis. At a median follow up of 4.3 y., the 5 y. EFS rate was 82.1% (SE 1.5%) for the pts in the DEX arm and 82.4% (SE 1.5%) in the PRED arm (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99, 98.8% CI 0.72–1.36, p=0.94); the futility boundary was crossed. In precursor-B ALL pts, the 5 y. EFS rate was 84.2% (DEX) vs 84.1% (PRED) (HR=0.95, p=0.75) and in precursor-T ALL the 5y. EFS rate was 70.7% vs 72.0% (HR=1.06, p=0.83). Isolated and combined CNS relapse crude rates were 1.1% each (DEX) vs 1.6% and 2.2% (PRED) respectively (resp.). The 5-y CNS incidence rate was 2.9% (DEX) vs 4.9% (PRED), the non-CNS incidence rate was 10.9% (DEX) vs 9.4% (PRED), and the 5-yr death in CR incidence rate was 2.7% (DEX) vs 2.1% (PRED). During induction the incidence of grade 3–4 infection was very similar in the two arms. During post-induction consolidation (“protocol IB”), it was higher in the DEX arm (23.5% vs 21.1%), in particular in pts randomized to prolonged L-asparaginase arm: 29.1% (DEX) vs 21.8% (PRED). Conclusion: DEX and PRED, used at the doses of resp. 6 and 60 mg/sm/d during induction, had equal efficacy. DEX decreased by 2.0% the 5-yr CNS incidence rate but increased by 1.5% the non-CNS incidence rate and by 0.6% the death in CR incidence rate. DEX in induction entails a higher infection rate during the consolidation, particularly when L-asparaginase is pursued throughout this phase. The optimal dosage of either glucocorticoid, compatible with acceptable toxicity, remains to be determined.

Background: Cranial irradiation (XRT) in combination with intrathecal chemotherapy has markedly reduced the incidence of meningeal relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and is still recommended for patients (pts) at high risk of relapse within the CNS. Because of late adverse effects of XRT, the previous CLG trial (EORTC 58881, 1989–1996) deleted XRT from the treatment regimen of all ALL patients. Nevertheless, the results (5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates) of 58881 trial were good in CNS-1 (72.1%), dubious CNS-2 (62.2%), surreptitious CNS-2 (64.6%) and particularly good in pts with CNS leukemia involvement (70.3%, SE 6.2%), emphasizing the importance of systemic chemotherapy in such pts, of whom, 50% were treated according to a very high risk group protocol (ASH, 2006). In order to validate this therapeutic strategy, we evaluate the prognostic significance of CNS status at diagnosis in ALL children enrolled from 12/1998 to 2/2008 in the EORTC CLG 58951 randomized phase III trial. Methods: Treatment design was according to BFM. Three randomizations were programmed: R1) the value of Dexamethasone (DEX) vs Prednisolone (PRED) during induction (all pts); R2) the value of prolonged (24 injections) vs conventional (12 injections) duration of L-asparaginase courses during consolidation and late intensification (all except very high risk pts); R3) the value of 6 (DEX or PRED + vincristine) pulses every 10 weeks in maintenance therapy (average risk pts). CNS-directed therapy consisted in i.v. methotrexate (MTX) (5 g/sqm over 24 hours) in 4 to 10 courses, according to the degree of initial CNS involvement, and intrathecal MTX. No radiotherapy was used. According to CNS status, pts were classified in 4 groups: CNS-1: no blasts and WBC5/μl, RBC Only CNS-3 pts were to receive 10 courses of i.v. MTX, but some of dubious (n=21) and surreptitious CNS-2 pts (n=38) did eventually receive 10 courses as well. Results: Between 12/1998 and 2/2008, a total of 1853 ALL pts were registered in 58951 trial. On 2/2008 a total of 1686 were evaluable for EFS; the distribution according to initial CNS status was: CNS-1 (n=1494, 88.6%), dubious CNS- 2 (n=100, 5.9%), surreptitious CNS-2 (n=59, 3.5%) and CNS-3 (n=33, 2%). The higher the degree of CNS involvement, the higher the incidence of unfavourable features: initial WBC□100000/μl, T-lineage, NCI high risk; very high risk (VHR) initial features (peripheral blasts ≥1000/μl post prephase, high-risk cytogenetics). In CNS-3 group, 10/33 (30%) pts were treated according to VHR protocol. Median follow-up was 4 years. CNS-1 Dubious CNS-2 Surrept. CNS-2 CNS-3 No CR 17 (1.1%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (3.0%) CCR 1286 (86.1%) 84 (84.0%) 50 (84.7%) 22 (66.7%) Isolated CNS rel. 17 (1.1%) 3 (3.0%) 1 (1.7%) 2 (6.1%) Combined CNS r. 23 (1.5%) 1 (1.0%) 2 (3.4%) 2 (6.1%) Non-CNS relapse 20 (13.4%) 2 (2.0%) 1 (1.7%) 5 (15.2%) Death in CR 31 (2.1%) 2 (2.0%) 1 (1.7%) 1 (3.0%) 4-yr EFS (%, SE) 84.0% (1.1%) 88.2% (3.5%) 82.4% (5.4%) 55.1% (10.8%) 4-yr OS (%, SE) 90.7% (0.9%) 92.0% (2.9%) 88.0% (4.6%) 63.4% (12.8%) Conclusion: In comparison with previous EORTC 58881 trial, and according to CNS status, EFS, OS, and isolated and combined CNS relapses rates improved in 58951 trial, except for CNS-3 pts. These “disappointing” results in CNS-3 pts (representing 2% of the entire population), less heavily treated in 58951 than in 58881, confirm the importance of systemic chemotherapy in such pts.

Introduction: In 2002 the EORTC and the German MDS Study Group initiated a randomized phase III study comparing low dose Decitabine to supportive care in patients (pts) of 60 years or older with primary or secondary MDS or CMML. MDS patients with either 11–20% BM blasts or ≤ 10% blasts and poor cytogenetics could be included. Pts with a BM blast count between 21–30% without signs of disease progression for at least one month were also candidates for the study. Methods: Patients were centrally randomized; stratification factors were cytogenetics risk group, IPSS, MDS (primary vs secondary) and study centre, The treatment schedule was 15 mg/m2 Decitabine i.v. over 4 hours every 8 hours for the first 3 three consecutive days, of every 6 week-cycle, for a maximum of 8 cycles. Results were evaluated every 2nd cycle. When a complete remission was reached at least another 2 courses were given. The primary endpoint of the study was Overall Survival. AML free survival, Progression Free Survival (PFS), response rate, toxicity and QoL were secondary endpoints. A total of 185 deaths were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (alpha=5%, beta=20%). Intent-to-treat analysis was used. Results: Between 10.2002 and 5.2007 a total of 233 pts (149 male and 84 female) were recruited from 40 centres. The median age was 70 (60–90 years); RAEB-t was diagnosed in 32% of the pts. Most pts had an IPSS Intermediate-2 (55%) or high risk (38%). Poor risk cytogenetics was found in 46% of the patients. Prior therapy for MDS (not being intensive chemotherapy) was given in 20% of pts. The randomized groups were well balanced regarding stratification factors, age and FAB classification. The median follow up was 2.5 years. Time to Off Study was 180 (Decitabine) vs 112 days (SC arm). The median number of cycles given to the patients was 4 with 40%getting no more than 2 cycles. In a significant number of pts, subsequent treatment, consisting of transplant (10%) or induction chemotherapy (11%), was given. The distribution of best response in Decitabine vs SC arm was CR (13% vs 0%), PR (6% vs 0%), HI (15% vs 2%), SD (14% vs 22%), PD (29% vs 68%), hypoplasia (14% vs 0%), inevaluable (8% vs 8%). The 18 pts on Decitabine with a HI showed the following responses: 3-lineage (n=7), 2-lineage (n=5) and 1-lineage (n=6). The median time to response (CR/PR/HI) was 0.32 yrs and the response duration was 0.72 years. Median OS was 0.84 (Decitabine) vs 0.71 years (SC arm), estimated HR was 0.88, 95% CI 0.66–1.17, p=0.38 (logrank 2-sided). The PFS was significantly (p=0.004) longer in Decitabine vs SC arm: median was 0.55 vs 0.25 years, HR=0.68 (95% CI 0.52–0.88). Time to AML or Death was not significantly improved (p=0.24): median was 0.73 vs 0.51 years (HR=0.85, 95% CI 0.64–1.12). Toxicity. The toxicity was mainly cytopenia related toxicity that was either disease related or hematotoxicity; CTC grade 3–4 febrile neutropenia was 26% (Decitabine) vs 7% (SC arm) and Grade 3–4 infection was 59% vs 47%. Differences in non hematologic toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal: grade 1–2 nausea (28% vs 16%) and grade 1–2 vomiting (16% vs 9%). During the study period, 29 (Decitabine) vs 25 (SC arm) patients died: due to either progression to MDS/AML (7 vs 20), toxicity (9 vs 0), progression and/or toxicity (10 vs 1), other reasons (3 vs 4). Conclusions. Decitabine was found to be an effective drug in these high risk MDS patients with a overall RR of 34%, (similar to earlier studies), leading to a significant PFS improvement as compared to SC arm. The difference Decitabine vs SC arm regarding time to AML or Death was not significant. Due to shorter treatment duration (not being continued beyond 8 cycles) and maybe also due to subsequent treatments administered after disease progression, the difference regarding OS was lower (HR=0.88) and not statistically significant.

Introduction: There is strong evidence that the cytopenia(s) in MDS might be caused by excessive, cytokine induced, intramedullary apoptotic death of progenitor hematopoietic cells. TNFα is a key cytokine that may trigger and sustain the excessive apoptosis processes in early disease. Infliximab is a chimeric human-murine monoclonal antibody with high affinity for human TNFα. Infliximab effectively prevents TNFα specific signaling in immune mediated inflammatory diseases. The therapeutic potential of suppressing TNFα mediated apoptosis in MDS was investigated. Patients and methods: The EORTC LG conducted an open label 2-arm randomized, Simon 2-stage design, phase II study, with the primary objective of assessing the activity of two different dose levels of Infliximab, as single agent, in patients (pts) with low-/intermediate-risk MDS according to IPSS. Activity was assessed by response rate, using the International Working Group criteria: Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) + Hematological Improvement (HI). Toxicity was assessed as a secondary objective. Results: Between February 2004 and March 2006, 37 eligible/evaluable pts (targeted sample size for the analysis of first stage) were randomly assigned to receive Infliximab, 3 mg/kg (18 pts) vs 5 mg/kg (19 pts), intravenously on days 1 and 15, thereafter every 4 weeks, for a total of 8 courses. Baseline characteristics by treatment arm (3 mg/kg vs 5 mg/kg) were: median age (65 vs 69 years); IPSS risk score: low (2 vs 6 pts), Intermediate-1 (14 vs 10 pts), Intermediate-2 (2 vs 3 pts); cytogenetic risk group: good (9 vs 12 pts), intermediate (5 vs 4 pts), unknown (4 vs 3 pts). Treatment applicability (3 mg/kg vs 5 mg/kg): 20 pts (10 vs 10) completed the 8 cycles of therapy, and 17 pts (8 vs 9) stopped earlier due to: progressive disease (2 vs 4), excessive toxicity (3 vs 0), patient’s refusal (2 vs 2), death due to an unrelated cause (1 vs 1), other reasons (0 vs 2). Activity (3 mg/kg vs 5 mg/kg): 3 pts responded to treatment in the 3 mg/kg arm: 1 CR, 1 PR and 1 HI (neutrophils), while no patient responded in the 5 mg/kg arm. A total of 21 pts (7 vs 14) had stable disease, 11 pts (7 vs 4) had documented disease progression and 2 pts were inevaluable for response (1 vs 1). After a median follow-up of 1.5 years, 8 pts (6 vs 2) died. Adverse events: 3 out of 18 patients died due to infections in the 3 mg/kg arm vs 0/19 in the 5 mg/kg arm. Two of the lethal infections were considered likely related to protocol treatment: one patient developed a fatal mucormycosis during treatment and one patient developed a fatal sepsis shortly after the eighth Infliximab infusion and thereafter also had documented progression to AML. There were few other AE/toxicities. Conclusion: Infliximab in the 3 mg/kg dose/schedule showed some activity in this study. Infliximab has limited activity as single agent but may warrant further investigation in combination with other active agents. Patients must be monitored closely for occurrence of severe infections.

To evaluate the prognostic significance of blasts in the CSF at diagnosis in children with ALL, 2049 patients (pts) enrolled from 1989 to 1996 in EORTC 58881 trial were retrospectively studied. Treatment design was according to BFM. Central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy consisted in i.v. methotrexate (MTX) (5 g/sqm over 4 hours) in 4 to 10 courses, according to grade of initial CNS involvement, and intrathecal MTX. No radiotherapy was used. Three randomizations were programmed: Erwinia vs Medac E.coli asparaginase (all pts); addition or not of i.v. Ara-C to i.v. MTX (for increased-risk pts); addition of monthly courses of i.v. 6-MP in maintenance therapy (all pts). According to CNS status, pts were classified in 4 groups: 1) CNS-1: 100/μl; 3) surreptitious CNS-2: presence of blasts, 5 WBC/μl, RBC 100000/μl; T-lineage; NCI high risk; very high risk (VHR) features (≥1000 peripheral blasts/μl post prephase, high-risk cytogenetics). Median follow-up was 7.5 years. The 5-yr overall event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (SE%) were 71.6 % (1.0 %) and 82.6 % (0.8%) respectively. The 5-yr EFS rate (SE%) was 72.1 % (1.0%) for CNS-1, 62.2 % (6.6%) for dubious CNS-2, 64.7 % (6.7%) for surreptitious CNS-2, and 70.3 % (6.2%) for CNS-3 group. Overall, pts with blasts in the CSF (dubious CNS-2, surreptitious CNS-2 or CNS-3) had a significantly (p=0.02) shorter EFS than those in the CNS-1 group: 5-yr EFS rate 65.6% (3.8%) vs 72.1%. Multivariate analysis indicated that low WBC, Medac E-Coli asparaginase, absence of VHR features, middle age group were, together, predictive for longer EFS, whereas CNS involvement (CNS-2/-3 vs CNS-1) lost its prognostic value (p=0.87). Out of 2018 pts who reached CR, a total of 71 isolated and 78 combined CNS relapses were reported. The 5-yr isolated CNS relapse rate was 3.8%: 3.5% in CNS-1, 6.7% in dubious CNS-2, 10.5% in surreptitious CNS-2 and 7.1% in CNS-3 group. The 5-yr isolated or combined CNS relapse rate was 7.9%; in the 4 CNS-groups it was 7.6%, 11.1%, 14.7% and 9.2% respectively. The 5-yr OS rate (SE%) was 83.5% (0.9%) in CNS-1 vs 72.4% (3.9%) in CNS-2/-3: p=0.0003. Prognostic importance was lost (p=0.23) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: the presence of blasts in the CSF, with or without pleiocytosis, is associated with unfavorable prognostic features and with worse outcome. Intensification of CNS-directed chemotherapy, without CNS radiation, is an effective treatment of initial meningeal leukemic involvement.

The AML-12 randomized phase III trial of EORTC-LG and GIMEMA assessed the efficacy and toxicity of HD-AraC (3 g/m2/12 hrs for 4 days) with daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm for 3 days) and etoposide (50 mg/sqm for 5 days) vs SD-AraC (100 mg/sqm for 10 days) with the same drugs. Patients (pts) in complete remission (CR) received consolidation (Co) consisting of AraC (500 mg/sqm/12 hrs for 6 days) and daunorubicin. Subsequently an allogeneic (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) was planned according to donor availability and age. A 2nd randomization was performed after Co in pts without a donor: auto-SCT followed or not by low dose IL-2. From 9 1999 till 7 2006, 1675 AML pts (APL excluded), age 50x109/l) was longer (median 4.0 vs 3.3 weeks; P=0.01). Among 886 pts randomized until 7 2005 by EORTC centers and 6 large GIMEMA centers, median follow-up of 2.5 years, 815 were evaluable for response. Out of 643 pts who reached CR, 57 went off study (toxicity, early progression). Among the remaining 586 who received Co, 37 could not be evaluated (early death/relapse, too early) and 549 were still CR after Co: 297 pts had no donor/no sibling, 197 had a donor and 55 were not typed. In these 3 groups the present estimates of the SCT rates are: 63% (auto-SCT), 71% (allo-SCT) and 69% (auto-SCT), resp. The 2.5-yr DFS rates (SE%) were 45% (3%), 61% (4%), and 67% (7%), resp. In pts < 50 yrs, 216 pts had no donor/no sibling, 135 had a donor and 14 have not been typed. For the first 2 groups, the 2.5 yr DFS rates (SE%) were 50% (4%) vs 68% (4.5%), hazard ratio=0.64, 95% CI (0.44, 0.93), P=0.02. In pts without a donor/a sibling successful mobilization of blood stem cells (b-SC) after Co was in HD-Ara-C vs SD-Ara-C arm 53 vs 69%, of failure/postponement 37 vs 24%, and other 9.5 vs 7%. The rate of auto-SCT was similar (65 vs 64%), but harvest of BM cells was more often required in the HD-AraC group (15 vs 4.5%). Pts with an insufficient/delayed b-SC harvest had a longer (P 50x109/l) after Co than those with a successful harvest: median = 6.7 vs 3.3 wks. Among 393 pts with information on cytogenetics, 14% had good risk, 50% normal, 23% other and 13% poor risk (-5/5q-, -7/7q-, complex). The 2.5-year EFS (no CR, time to relapse or death in CR) rates (SE%) were 68% (7%), 42% (4%), 32% (5%) and 14% (5%), resp. So far: toxicity of HD-Ara-C was acceptable; in those who received HD-AraC in induction platelet recovery after Co was longer and the rate of successful b-SC collection was lower; SCT rates are high and similar in the 2 randomized arms; pts