Search

In families at risk for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) that do not fulfill all clinical criteria for HNPCC, additional evidence is sought by testing cancer specimens for microsatellite instability (MSI). We investigated whether the location of a colorectal cancer (CRC) predicts the result of MSI-testing in these families. One hundred and seven patients suspected for HNPCC were offered MSI-testing. MSI-testing was positive in 6/7 patients with endometrial carcinoma and in 22/100 patients with CRC. Only one out of 22 (4%) rectal cancers was MSI-positive, and in this patient no mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation was found. Right-sided colon carcinomas were more likely to be MSI-positive (14/37 or 38%), followed by left-sided colon carcinomas (7/4 or 17%) (p < 0.05), with 6/14 and 4/7 MMR gene mutations, respectively. The likelihood that a tumor would be MSI-positive was 3.3 times greater for right-sided than for left-sided colon cancer (OR 3.3, p < 0.05). Microsatellite instability was 8.1 times more frequent in colon cancers than in rectal cancers (p < 0.05). The presence of MSI was independently related to fulfillment of the Bethesda criteria (OR 7.0, p = 0.01). In families with multiple cases of colorectal cancer, the rectal cancers are only rarely MSI-positive. This indicates that even in families with multiple colorectal cancers, rectal cancers are most commonly of sporadic origin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is considered to be essential for spermatogenesis. Therefore, genetic abnormalities of FSH signalling on testicular Sertoli cells would be expected to affect sperm production negatively in males. Inactivating FSH receptor mutations have been reported earlier in both males and females. All affected males had elevated FSH serum concentrations and abnormal sperm parameters. We postulated that inactivating FSH receptor mutations might be a cause of oligozoospermia or azoospermia and reviewed the clinical data of 151 male intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) candidates with special attention to FSH serum concentrations. The exclusion criteria for mutation screening of the FSH receptor gene were: a history of operative sterilization or testicular malignancy, congenital abnormality other than cryptorchidism, and a chromosomal aberration or a Y-chromosome microdeletion. The inclusion criteria were: male (ICSI candidate) with azoospermia or oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) and elevated FSH serum concentrations. In total, 23 males with OAT and five males with azoospermia were tested for mutations of the coding sequences and the intron-exon boundaries of the FSH receptor gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by single strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP). Neutral polymorphisms were readily detected using this technique in both probands and controls. None of the 28 selected patients showed a pathogenic FSH receptor mutation. Mutations in the FSH receptor gene are not a common cause of infertility in ICSI candidates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of biomarkers is challenging due to the indirect impact on health outcomes and the lack of sufficient fit-for-purpose data. Hands-on guidance is lacking., Objective: We aimed firstly to explore how CEAs in the context of three different types of biomarker applications have addressed these challenges, and secondly to develop recommendations for future CEAs., Methods: A scoping review was performed for three biomarker applications: predictive, prognostic, and serial testing, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, early-stage colorectal cancer, and all-stage colorectal cancer, respectively. Information was extracted on the model assumptions and uncertainty, and the reported outcomes. An in-depth analysis of the literature was performed describing the impact of model assumptions in the included studies., Results: A total of 43 CEAs were included (31 predictive, 6 prognostic, and 6 serial testing). Of these, 40 utilized different sources for test and treatment parameters, and three studies utilized a single source. Test performance was included in 78% of these studies utilizing different sources, but this parameter was differently expressed across biomarker applications. Sensitivity analyses for test performance was only performed in half of these studies. For the linkage of test results to treatments outcomes, a minority of the studies explored the impact of suboptimal adherence to test results, and/or explored potential differences in treatment effects for different biomarker subgroups. Intermediate outcomes were reported by 67% of studies., Conclusions: We identified various approaches for dealing with challenges in CEAs of biomarker tests for three different biomarker applications. Recommendations on assumptions, handling uncertainty, and reported outcomes were drafted to enhance modeling practices for future biomarker cost-effectiveness evaluations., Competing Interests: Declarations. Funding: The COIN project is funded by the ZonMw ' Personalised Medicine' programme (project number 848101011), PGDX and CZ and this research was funded by the CAN.HEAL project through the European Commission EU4Health Program 2021–2027 under Grant No. 101080009. Conflict of interest: A.K., L.F.S., D.B., I.G.I., L.G.C., W.H.H., V.M.H.C., and V.P.R. declare no conflict of interest. R.J.A.F reports public private partnership consortia grants in collaboration with Labcorp (Personal Genome Diagnostics), Delfi Diagnostics, Solvias (Cergentis BV), MERCK BV, outside the submitted work. In addition, R.J.A.F. has several patents pending. E.S. reports lectures for Bio-Rad, Seracare, Roche, Biocartis, Illumina, Lilly, Janssen Cilag (Johnson&Johnson), AstraZeneca and Agena Bioscience; he is consultant in advisory boards for MSD/Merck, GSK, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Sysmex, Roche, Novartis, Bayer, BMS, Lilly, Amgen, Illumina, Agena Bioscience, Janssen Cilag (Johnson&Johnson), Sinnovisionlab, Diaceutics, CC Diagnostics; and received research grants from Biocartis, Invitae-ArcherDX, AstraZeneca, Agena Bio-science, BMS, Bio-Rad, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, CC Diagnostics, SNN/EFRO and Abbott (all paid to UMCG account); and travel reimbursements from Bio-Rad, Abbott, Illumina, Agena Bioscience, Roche, IQNPath and BioRAD. M.J.L.L. has had advisory roles (institutional) with AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Illumina, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. G.A.M. is co-founder and board member (CSO) of CRCbioscreen BV, CSO of Health-RI (Dutch National Health Data infrastructure for research & innovation), and member of the supervisory board of IKNL (Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation). He has a research collaboration with CZ Health Insurances (cash matching to ZonMw grant) and he has research collaborations with Exact Sciences, Sysmex, Sentinel Ch. SpA, Personal Genome Diagnostics (PGDX), DELFi and Hartwig Medical Foundation; these companies provide materials, equipment and/or sample/genomic analyses. Ethics approval: According to the Dutch Law on Medical Scientific Research (WMO), this study did not require approval by a medical ethics committee. Informed consent: All invited experts that participated in the expert roundtable consented before participating. Data availability: Extracted literature findings are available in Online Resource 4 in the ESM. Transcripts of the expert roundtable will not be shared to ensure anonymity of the participants. Author contributions: AK, VC and VR developed the ideas and the methods for this study. AK and LS conducted the screening, the data extraction and the data analysis of the literature. AK, LS, VC, VR, and WH developed the first version of the recommendations. These recommendations were revised by all authors, after which AK and LS drafted the first version of the manuscript. The manuscript was reviewed in multiple rounds by all authors., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease. Approximately 10% of affected individuals have an inherited component. Deleterious germline variants increase the lifetime risk for PDAC and are often associated with an elevated risk for extra-pancreatic malignancies. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and impact of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in patients with PDAC and extra-pancreatic malignancies. Using tissue samples and longitudinal data from a nationwide pathology database, we identified patients with PDAC and a set of 7 extra-pancreatic malignancies to investigate the presence of gPVs in 25 cancer susceptibility genes with targeted next-generation sequencing. Of 473 patients with PDAC and at least 1 extra-pancreatic malignancy, 75 (16%) had gPVs. These were predominantly in ATM (n = 22), CDKN2A (n = 14), BRCA2 (n = 10), or CHEK2 (n = 10) genes. The combination of PDAC and ovarian carcinoma carried the highest prevalence of gPVs (4 of 10; 40%), followed by PDAC and melanoma (15 of 53; 28%), and PDAC and gastric cancer (2 of 9; 22%). Patients with PDAC and certain extra-pancreatic malignancies carry a higher burden of gPVs than unselected PDAC cohorts. This is a group that very likely benefits from genetic testing because germline status can have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications for affected individuals and their family members., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at a high risk of breast and ovarian carcinomas with BRCA1/2 deficiency and homologous recombination deficiency that can be detected by analysis of genome-wide genomic instability features such as large-scale state transitions, telomeric allelic imbalances, and genomic loss of heterozygosity. Malignancies with homologous recombination deficiency are more sensitive to platinum-based therapies and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We investigated the fraction of non-breast or ovarian malignancies that have BRCA1/2 deficiency and genomic instability features., Methods: The full tumor history of a large, historical, clinic-based, consecutive cohort of 2965 individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 was retrieved from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga). In total, 169 non-breast or ovarian malignancies were collected and analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing and shallow whole-genome sequencing to determine somatic second-hit alterations and genomic instabilities indicative of homologous recombination deficiency, respectively., Results: BRCA1/2 deficiency was detected in 27% (21/79) and 23% (21/90) of 20 different types of non-breast or ovarian malignancies in individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. These malignancies had a higher genomic instability score than BRCA1- or BRCA2-proficient malignancies (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively)., Conclusions: BRCA1/2 deficiency and genomic instability features were found in 27% and 23% of a broad spectrum of non-breast or ovarian malignancies in individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. Evaluation of the effectiveness of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in these individuals should be focused on tumors with a confirmed absence of a wild-type allele., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) typically exhibits resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, a subset of mCRPC patients displays a more immunogenic profile. This study examines efficacy and safety of dual ICI therapy in molecularly selected mCRPC., Patients and Methods: This single-arm, phase II trial included 69 molecularly selected mCRPC patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), non-synonymous tumour mutational burden ≥7.1 muts/Mb (hTMB), a BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm), or biallelic CDK12 inactivation (CDK12i). Efficacy was assessed in ICI-naïve patients (cohort A) with RECIST 1.1 (A1) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (A2) measurable disease. Safety was evaluated in cohorts A and B (prior ICI monotherapy). Treatment included nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint was disease control rate beyond 6 months (DCR > 6), aiming to surpass a DCR > 6 of 22%., Results: Patients initiated treatment between January 2021 and February 2024. Cohort A included 65 patients. Of these, 21 had dMMR (32%), 8 had hTMB (12%), 20 had BRCAm (31%), and 16 had CDK12i (25%). DCR > 6 was achieved in 38% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 27% to 51%], and was highest in dMMR (81%), followed by hTMB (25%), CDK12i (19%), and BRCAm (15%). Objective response rate in cohort A was 38% (95% CI 22% to 55%) and 47% (95% CI 34% to 60%) exhibited a 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen levels. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.5-12.0 months) in cohort A, and 32.7 months (95% CI 21.8 months-not reached) in dMMR patients. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) led to permanent discontinuation in 14 of 69 patients (20%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 48% of patients, with diarrhoea and elevated transaminases each in 10%. There was one treatment-related death due to a bowel perforation and a second following euthanasia after grade 4 toxicity., Conclusions: This trial of dual ICIs in molecularly selected mCRPC met its primary endpoint, showing DCR > 6 in 38% of patients. Dual ICIs exhibited modest responses in the hTMB, BRCAm, and CDK12i subgroups, but demonstrated exceptional efficacy in dMMR., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Genetic testing in patients with ovarian carcinoma (OC) is crucial, as around 10-15% of these women have a genetic predisposition to OC. Although guidelines have recommended universal germline testing for all patients with OC for a decade, implementation has proved challenging, thus resulting in low germline-testing rates (around 30-50%). Many new initiatives to improve genetic-testing rates have emerged, but most have been carried out at the local level, leading to differences in workflows within and between countries. We present an example of a nationwide implementation project that has successfully led to a uniform, high-quality genetic-testing workflow for women with OC. Nationwide multidisciplinary meetings generated consensus on the preferred workflow for OC genetic testing: the "Tumor-First" workflow. This workflow means starting by testing the tumor DNA for the presence of pathogenic variants in OC-risk genes, thus providing a prescreen to germline testing while yielding information on the effectiveness of treatment with PARP inhibitors. This new workflow efficiently stratifies genetic counseling and germline testing and reduces healthcare costs. Although challenging, the nationwide implementation of this workflow was successful, resulting in tumor-DNA testing rates exceeding 80%. In this article, we present our structured implementation approach, illustrate our implementation strategies-which were tailored to identified factors important to implementation-and share the lessons learned from the Tumor-First implementation project. This knowledge could facilitate the future implementation of workflows aimed at optimizing the recognition of hereditary cancers., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cancer evolves through the stepwise erosion of coding homopolymers in target genes. Curiously, the MMR genes MutS homolog 6 (MSH6) and MutS homolog 3 (MSH3) also contain coding homopolymers, and these are frequent mutational targets in MMR-deficient cancers. The impact of incremental MMR mutations on MMR-deficient cancer evolution is unknown. Here we show that microsatellite instability modulates DNA repair by toggling hypermutable mononucleotide homopolymer runs in MSH6 and MSH3 through stochastic frameshift switching. Spontaneous mutation and reversion modulate subclonal mutation rate, mutation bias and HLA and neoantigen diversity. Patient-derived organoids corroborate these observations and show that MMR homopolymer sequences drift back into reading frame in the absence of immune selection, suggesting a fitness cost of elevated mutation rates. Combined experimental and simulation studies demonstrate that subclonal immune selection favors incremental MMR mutations. Overall, our data demonstrate that MMR-deficient colorectal cancers fuel intratumor heterogeneity by adapting subclonal mutation rate and diversity to immune selection., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

CHEK2 is considered to be involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR). Individuals who have germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in CHEK2 are at increased risk to develop breast cancer and likely other primary cancers. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been shown to be effective in the treatment of cancers that present with HRR deficiency-for example, caused by inactivation of BRCA1/2. However, clinical trials have shown little to no efficacy of PARPi in patients with CHEK2 gPVs. Here, we show that both breast and non-breast cancers from individuals who have biallelic gPVs in CHEK2 (germline CHEK2 deficiency) do not present with molecular profiles that fit with HRR deficiency. This finding provides a likely explanation why PARPi therapy is not successful in the treatment of CHEK2-deficient cancers., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Identification of tumor-derived variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has potential as a sensitive and reliable surrogate for tumor tissue-based routine diagnostic testing. However, variations in pre(analytical) procedures affect the efficiency of ctDNA recovery. Here, an external quality assessment (EQA) was performed to determine the performance of ctDNA mutation detection work flows that are used in current diagnostic settings across laboratories within the Dutch COIN consortium (ctDNA on the road to implementation in The Netherlands)., Methods: Aliquots of 3 high-volume diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) plasma samples and 3 artificial reference plasma samples with predetermined mutations were distributed among 16 Dutch laboratories. Participating laboratories were requested to perform ctDNA analysis for BRAF exon 15, EGFR exon 18-21, and KRAS exon 2-3 using their regular circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) analysis work flow. Laboratories were assessed based on adherence to the study protocol, overall detection rate, and overall genotyping performance., Results: A broad range of preanalytical conditions (e.g., plasma volume, elution volume, and extraction methods) and analytical methodologies (e.g., droplet digital PCR [ddPCR], small-panel PCR assays, and next-generation sequencing [NGS]) were used. Six laboratories (38%) had a performance score of >0.90; all other laboratories scored between 0.26 and 0.80. Although 13 laboratories (81%) reached a 100% overall detection rate, the therapeutically relevant EGFR p.(S752&#95;I759del) (69%), EGFR p.(N771&#95;H773dup) (50%), and KRAS p.(G12C) (48%) mutations were frequently not genotyped accurately., Conclusions: Divergent (pre)analytical protocols could lead to discrepant clinical outcomes when using the same plasma samples. Standardization of (pre)analytical work flows can facilitate the implementation of reproducible liquid biopsy testing in the clinical routine., (© Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine 2024.)

Aim: Currently, screening of colorectal cancers (CRC) by assessing mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability (MSI) is used to identify Lynch syndrome (LS) patients. Advanced adenomas are considered immediate precursor lesions of CRC. In this study we investigate the relevance of screening of advanced adenomas for LS in population screening., Methods and Results: Advanced adenomas (n = 1572) were selected from the Dutch colorectal cancer population screening programme, based on one or more of the criteria: tubulovillous (n = 848, 54%) or villous adenoma (n = 118, 7.5%), diameter ≥ 1 cm (n = 1286, 82%) and/or high-grade dysplasia (n = 176, 11%). In 86 cases (5%), all three criteria were fulfilled at the same time. MMR-IHC and/or MSI analyses were performed on all cases. Only five advanced adenomas (0.3%) showed dMMR and MSI, including two cases with hypermethylation. In at least two patients a germline event was suspected based on allelic frequencies. No pathogenic explanation was found in the last case., Conclusion: Timely testing of precursor lesions would be preferable to detect new LS patients before CRC development. However, standard assessment of dMMR of advanced adenomas from the population screening is not effective., (© 2024 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce durable disease control in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), but only 20-25% of patients respond. Early identification of a nondurable response will improve management strategies., Objective: To investigate whether on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) measurements can predict ICI responsiveness in mUC patients., Design, Setting, and Participants: This study consists of a discovery cohort of 40 mUC patients and a prospective multicenter validation cohort of 16 mUC patients. Plasma cell-free DNA was collected at baseline and after 3 and 6 wk on ICIs. The ctDNA levels were calculated from targeted sequencing., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Outcome measurements were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and nondurable response (PFS ≤6 mo). Relationships with ctDNA were assessed using Cox regression. Changes in ctDNA level at 3 and 6 wk were categorized by an increase or decrease relative to baseline., Results and Limitations: In the discovery cohort, ctDNA was detected in 37/40 (93%) of patients at baseline. A ctDNA increase was observed in 12/15 (80%) and ten of 12 (83%) patients with a nondurable response at 3 and 6 wk, respectively. Of patients with a durable response (PFS >6 mo), 94% showed a decrease. A ctDNA increase at 3 wk was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 7.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-19.5) and OS (HR 8.0, 95% CI 3.0-21.0), independent of clinical prognostic variables. Similar results were observed at 6 wk. The 3-wk association with PFS was validated in a prospective cohort (HR 7.5, 95% CI 1.3-42.6). Limitations include the limited number of patients., Conclusions: Early changes in ctDNA levels are strongly linked to the duration of ICI benefit in mUC and may contribute to timely therapy modifications., Patient Summary: Benefit from immunotherapy can be predicted after only 3 wk of treatment by investigating cancer DNA in blood. This could help in timely therapy changes for urothelial cancer patients with limited benefit from immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: To diagnose the full spectrum of hereditary and congenital diseases, genetic laboratories use many different workflows, ranging from karyotyping to exome sequencing. A single generic high-throughput workflow would greatly increase efficiency. We assessed whether genome sequencing (GS) can replace these existing workflows aimed at germline genetic diagnosis for rare disease., Methods: We performed short-read GS (NovaSeq™6000; 150 bp paired-end reads, 37 × mean coverage) on 1000 cases with 1271 known clinically relevant variants, identified across different workflows, representative of our tertiary diagnostic centers. Variants were categorized into small variants (single nucleotide variants and indels < 50 bp), large variants (copy number variants and short tandem repeats) and other variants (structural variants and aneuploidies). Variant calling format files were queried per variant, from which workflow-specific true positive rates (TPRs) for detection were determined. A TPR of ≥ 98% was considered the threshold for transition to GS. A GS-first scenario was generated for our laboratory, using diagnostic efficacy and predicted false negative as primary outcome measures. As input, we modeled the diagnostic path for all 24,570 individuals referred in 2022, combining the clinical referral, the transition of the underlying workflow(s) to GS, and the variant type(s) to be detected., Results: Overall, 95% (1206/1271) of variants were detected. Detection rates differed per variant category: small variants in 96% (826/860), large variants in 93% (341/366), and other variants in 87% (39/45). TPRs varied between workflows (79-100%), with 7/10 being replaceable by GS. Models for our laboratory indicate that a GS-first strategy would be feasible for 84.9% of clinical referrals (750/883), translating to 71% of all individuals (17,444/24,570) receiving GS as their primary test. An estimated false negative rate of 0.3% could be expected., Conclusions: GS can capture clinically relevant germline variants in a 'GS-first strategy' for the majority of clinical indications in a genetics diagnostic lab., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are transforming the current treatment landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. By reanalysing published data on olaparib, talazoparib, rucaparib and niraparib, we provide a concise overview of responses by molecular subgroup. As monotherapy, all PARPi showed comparable efficacy and the same hierarchy in responsiveness: patients with tumours harbouring aberrations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCAm) evidently demonstrate superior responses when compared to aberrations in other homologous recombination repair (HRR) related genes. Niraparib seems to cause more grade ≥3 adverse events in comparison to other PARPi. PARPi have also been combined with androgen-receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSI) for both patients with tumours harbouring aberrations in HRR genes (HRRm), and molecularly unselected patients. Compared to wildtype, BRCAm patients responded best, followed by HRRm. Olaparib-abiraterone, niraparib-abiraterone, and talazoparib-enzalutamide all prolonged progression-free survival compared to an ARSI alone in HRRm patients. In the non-HRRm subgroup, only olaparib-abiraterone and talazoparib-enzalutamide were effective. Results for the combination of rucaparib with enzalutamide are yet to be reported. The rate of grade ≥3 adverse events for the combination regimens is 10-30% higher when compared to an ARSI alone. Given the limited efficacy in unselected patients, these PARPi-ARSI combinations may be best reserved for selected patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Nielka van Erp: Research support (institutional): ‘Astellas and Ipsen’. Marjolijn Ligtenberg: Advisory role (institutional): ‘AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Illumina, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche’. Niven Mehra: Advisory role (compensated and institutional): ‘AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, BMS, Bayer, Astellas and Janssen’. Research support (institutional): ‘Astrazeneca, MSD, Astellas, Janssen, Pfizer and Roche’. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Individuals with Lynch syndrome are at increased hereditary risk of colorectal and endometrial carcinomas with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mismatch repair-deficiency (dMMR), which make these tumors vulnerable to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our aim is to assess how often other tumor types in these individuals share these characteristics., Methods: We retrieved the full tumor history of a historical clinic-based cohort of 1745 individuals with Lynch syndrome and calculated the standardized incidence ratio for all tumor types. MSI status, somatic second hit alterations, and immunohistochemistry-based MMR status were analyzed in 236 noncolorectal and nonendometrial malignant tumors., Results: In individuals with Lynch syndrome MSI-H/dMMR occurred both in Lynch-spectrum and in non-Lynch-spectrum malignancies (85% vs 37%, P < .01). MSI-H/dMMR malignancies were found in nearly all non-Lynch-spectrum tumor types. Almost all breast carcinomas had medullary features, and most of them were MSI-H/dMMR. Breast carcinoma with medullary features were shown to be associated with Lynch syndrome (standardized incidence ratio = 38.8, 95% confidence interval = 16.7 to 76.5)., Conclusions: In individuals with Lynch syndrome, MSI-H/dMMR occurs in more than one-half of the malignancies other than colorectal and endometrial carcinomas, including tumor types without increased incidence. The Lynch-spectrum tumors should be expanded to breast carcinomas with medullary features. All malignancies in patients with Lynch syndrome, independent of subtype, should be tested for MSI-H/dMMR in case therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is considered. Moreover, Lynch syndrome should be considered an underlying cause of all MSI-H/dMMR malignancies other than colorectal and endometrial carcinomas., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objective: Genetic testing in epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) is essential to identify a hereditary cause like a germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV). An efficient strategy for genetic testing in OC is highly desired. We evaluated costs and effects of two strategies; (i) Tumor-First strategy, using a tumor DNA test as prescreen to germline testing, and (ii) Germline-First strategy, referring all patients to the clinical geneticist for germline testing., Methods: Tumor-First and Germline-First were compared in two scenarios; using real-world uptake of testing and setting implementation to 100%. Decision analytic models were built to analyze genetic testing costs (including counseling) per OC patient and per family as well as BRCA1/2 detection probabilities. With a Markov model, the life years gained among female relatives with a germline BRCA1/2 PV was investigated., Results: Focusing on real-world uptake, with the Tumor-First strategy more OC patients and relatives with a germline BRCA1/2 PV are detected (70% versus 49%), at lower genetic testing costs (€1898 versus €2502 per patient, and €2511 versus €2930 per family). Thereby, female relatives with a germline BRCA1/2 PV can live on average 0.54 life years longer with Tumor-First compared to Germline-First. Focusing on 100% uptake, the genetic testing costs per OC patient are substantially lower in the Tumor-First strategy (€2257 versus €4986)., Conclusions: The Tumor-First strategy in OC patients is more effective in identifying germline BRCA1/2 PV at lower genetic testing costs per patient and per family. Optimal implementation of Tumor-First can further improve detection of heredity in OC patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Vera M. Witjes, Marjolijn J.L. Ligtenberg, Janet R. Vos, Jozé C.C. Braspenning, Marian J.E. Mourits, Joanne A. de Hullu, Eddy M.M. Adang, and Nicoline Hoogerbrugge declare no conflict of interest. Margreet G.E.M. Ausems received a grant from AstraZeneca for development and filming of a training module regarding mainstreaming of genetic testing in OC, which is unrelated to the current manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with early-stage and locally advanced rectal cancer are often treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery or watch and wait. This study evaluated the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to measure disease after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery to optimize treatment choices., Materials and Methods: Patients with rectal cancer treated with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy were included and diagnostic biopsies were analyzed for tumor-specific mutations. Presence of ctDNA was measured in plasma by tracing the tumor-informed mutations using a next-generation sequencing panel. The association between ctDNA detection and clinicopathological characteristics and progression-free survival was measured., Results: Before treatment ctDNA was detected in 69% (35/51) of patients. After neoadjuvant therapy ctDNA was detected in only 15% (5/34) of patients. In none of the patients with a complete clinical response who were selected for a watch and wait strategy (0/10) or patients with ypN0 disease (0/8) ctDNA was detected, whereas it was detected in 31% (5/16) of patients with ypN + disease. After surgery ctDNA was detected in 16% (3/19) of patients, of which all (3/3) developed recurrent disease compared to only 13% (2/16) in patients with undetected ctDNA after surgery. In an exploratory survival analysis, both ctDNA detection after neoadjuvant therapy and after surgery was associated with worse progression-free survival (p = 0.01 and p = 0.007, respectively, Cox-regression)., Conclusion: These data show that in patients with early-stage and locally advanced rectal cancer tumor-informed ctDNA detection in plasma using ultradeep sequencing may have clinical value to complement response prediction after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Prof. Marjolijn Ligtenberg received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Illumina, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. All these relations were not related to this study and were paid to the institution. Prof. Johannes de Wilt received research funding from Dutch Cancer Society, ZonMw and Metronic. These relations were not related to this study and were paid to the institution. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Accurate biomarkers to monitor tumor load and response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery could optimize treatment regimens., Objective: This study aimed to explore the clinical validity of tumor-informed quantification of circulating tumor DNA in blood using ultradeep sequencing., Design: Resection specimens from 53 colorectal cancer patients were analyzed for tumor-specific mutations in 15 genes. These mutations were used to measure the presence of circulating tumor DNA in preoperatively collected plasma samples using hybrid capture-based sequencing. Additional postoperative measurements were performed 1 week after surgery in 16 patients., Settings: The study was conducted at the Radboud University Medical Center., Patients: A total of 53 colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery of metastases were included., Main Outcome Measures: The detection of circulating tumor DNA., Results: At least 1 tumor-specific mutation was detected in all tumor samples. In preoperative plasma samples, circulating tumor DNA was detected in 88% (37/42) of systemic treatment-naïve patients and in 55% (6/11) of patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. More specifically, circulating tumor DNA was detected in 0% (0/3) of cases with a subtotal or partial pathologic response and in 75% (6/8) of cases without a pathologic response in the resection specimen ( p = 0.06). In postoperative plasma samples, circulating tumor DNA was detected in 80% (4/5) of patients with an incomplete resection and in 0% (0/11) of those with a complete resection ( p = 0.003)., Limitations: The study was limited by the heterogeneity of the cohort and the small number of postoperative plasma samples., Conclusions: These data indicate that tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA detection in the plasma of patients undergoing surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer is feasible and may have clinical value in response monitoring and predicting residual disease. Prospective studies are needed to establish the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA analysis to guide treatment decisions in these patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B990 ., Validez Clnica Del Anlisis De Adn Del Tumor Circulante Informado Por El Tumor En Pacientes Sometidos a Ciruga De Metstasis Colorrectales: ANTECEDENTES:Los biomarcadores precisos para monitorear la carga tumoral y la respuesta en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico que se someten a cirugía podrían optimizar los regímenes de tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Este estudio explora la validez clínica de la cuantificación informada por el tumor del ADN tumoral circulante en sangre mediante secuenciación ultraprofunda.DISEÑO:Se analizaron muestras de resección de 53 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en busca de mutaciones específicas del tumor en quince genes. Estas mutaciones se usaron para medir la presencia de ADN tumoral circulante en muestras de plasma recolectadas antes de la operación usando secuenciación basada en captura híbrida. Se realizaron mediciones postoperatorias adicionales una semana después de la cirugía en dieciséis pacientes.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en el centro médico de la universidad de Radboud.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron un total de 53 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal sometidos a cirugía de metástasis.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La detección de ADN tumoral circulante.RESULTADOS:Se detectó al menos una mutación específica de tumor en todas las muestras de tumor. En muestras de plasma preoperatorias, se detectó ADN tumoral circulante en el 88% (37/42) de los pacientes sin tratamiento sistémico previo y en el 55% (6/11) de los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia preoperatoria. Más concretamente, en el 0% (0/3) de los casos con respuesta patológica subtotal o parcial y en el 75% (6/8) de los casos sin respuesta patológica en la pieza de resección ( p = 0,06). En muestras de plasma postoperatorio se detectó ADN tumoral circulante en el 80% (4/5) de los pacientes con una resección incompleta y en el 0% (0/11) de los que tenían resección completa ( p = 0,003).LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por la heterogeneidad de la cohorte y el pequeño número de muestras de plasma postoperatorias.CONCLUSIONES:Estos datos indican que la detección de ADN tumoral circulante informado por el tumor en el plasma de pacientes sometidos a cirugía por cáncer colorrectal metastásico es factible y puede tener valor clínico en el control de la respuesta y la predicción de la enfermedad residual. Se necesitan estudios prospectivos para establecer la utilidad clínica del análisis de ADN tumoral circulante para guiar las decisiones de tratamiento en estos pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B990 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria )., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.)

Universal tumor DNA testing in epithelial ovarian cancer patients can function not only as an efficient prescreen for hereditary cancer testing, but may also guide treatment choices. This innovation, introduced as Tumor-First workflow, offers great opportunities, but ensuring optimal multidisciplinary collaboration is a challenge. We investigated factors that were relevant and important for large-scale implementation. In three multidisciplinary online focus groups, healthcare professionals (gynecologic oncologists, pathologists, clinical geneticists, and clinical laboratory specialists) were interviewed on factors critical for the implementation of the Tumor-First workflow. Recordings were transcribed for analysis in Atlas.ti according to the framework of Flottorp that categorizes seven implementation domains. Healthcare professionals from all disciplines endorse implementation of the Tumor-First workflow, but more detailed standardization and advice regarding the logistics of the workflow were needed. Healthcare professionals explored ways to stay informed about the different phases of the workflow and the results. They emphasized the importance of including all epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the workflow and monitoring this inclusion. Overall, healthcare professionals would appreciate supporting material for the implementation of the Tumor-First workflow in the daily work routine. Focus group discussions have revealed factors for developing a tailored implementation strategy for the Tumor-First workflow in order to optimize care for epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Future innovations affecting multidisciplinary oncology teams including clinical geneticists can benefit from the lessons learned., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising new biomarker with multiple potential applications in cancer care. Estimating total cost of ctDNA testing is necessary for reimbursement and implementation, but challenging because of variations in workflow. We aimed to develop a micro-costing framework for consistent cost calculation of ctDNA testing. First, the foundation of the framework was built, based on the complete step-wise diagnostic workflow of ctDNA testing. Second, the costing method was set up, including costs for personnel, materials, equipment, overhead, and failures. Third, the framework was evaluated by experts and applied to six case studies, including PCR-, mass spectrometry-, and next-generation sequencing-based platforms, from three Dutch hospitals. The developed ctDNA micro-costing framework includes the diagnostic workflow from blood sample collection to diagnostic test result. The framework was developed from a Dutch perspective and takes testing volume into account. An open access tool is provided to allow for laboratory-specific calculations to explore the total costs of ctDNA testing specific workflow parameters matching the setting of interest. It also allows to straightforwardly assess the impact of alternative prices or assumptions on the cost per sample by simply varying the input parameters. The case studies showed a wide range of costs, from €168 to €7638 ($199 to $9124) per sample, and generated information. These costs are sensitive to the (coverage of) platform, setting, and testing volume., (Copyright © 2023 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Truncating pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants of CDH1 cause hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), a tumour risk syndrome that predisposes carrier individuals to diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer. Rare CDH1 missense variants are often classified as variants of unknown significance. We conducted a genotype-phenotype analysis in families carrying rare CDH1 variants, comparing cancer spectrum in carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV; analysed jointly) or missense variants of unknown significance, assessing the frequency of families with lobular breast cancer among PV/LPV carrier families, and testing the performance of lobular breast cancer-expanded criteria for CDH1 testing., Methods: This genotype-first study used retrospective diagnostic and clinical data from 854 carriers of 398 rare CDH1 variants and 1021 relatives, irrespective of HDGC clinical criteria, from 29 institutions in ten member-countries of the European Reference Network on Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS). Data were collected from Oct 1, 2018, to Sept 20, 2022. Variants were classified by molecular type and clinical actionability with the American College of Medical Genetics and Association for Molecular Pathology CDH1 guidelines (version 2). Families were categorised by whether they fulfilled the 2015 and 2020 HDGC clinical criteria. Genotype-phenotype associations were analysed by Student's t test, Kruskal-Wallis, χ 2 , and multivariable logistic regression models. Performance of HDGC clinical criteria sets were assessed with an equivalence test and Youden index, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were compared by Z test., Findings: From 1971 phenotypes (contributed by 854 probands and 1021 relatives aged 1-93 years), 460 had gastric and breast cancer histology available. CDH1 truncating PV/LPVs occurred in 176 (21%) of 854 families and missense variants of unknown significance in 169 (20%) families. Multivariable logistic regression comparing phenotypes occurring in families carrying PV/LPVs or missense variants of unknown significance showed that lobular breast cancer had the greatest positive association with the presence of PV/LPVs (odds ratio 12·39 [95% CI 2·66-57·74], p=0·0014), followed by diffuse gastric cancer (8·00 [2·18-29·39], p=0·0017) and gastric cancer (7·81 [2·03-29·96], p=0·0027). 136 (77%) of 176 families carrying PV/LPVs fulfilled the 2015 HDGC criteria. Of the remaining 40 (23%) families, who did not fulfil the 2015 criteria, 11 fulfilled the 2020 HDGC criteria, and 18 had lobular breast cancer only or lobular breast cancer and gastric cancer, but did not meet the 2020 criteria. No specific CDH1 variant was found to predispose individuals specifically to lobular breast cancer, although 12 (7%) of 176 PV/LPV carrier families had lobular breast cancer only. Addition of three new lobular breast cancer-centred criteria improved testing sensitivity while retaining high specificity. The probability of finding CDH1 PV/LPVs in patients fulfilling the lobular breast cancer-expanded criteria, compared with the 2020 criteria, increased significantly (AUC 0·92 vs 0·88; Z score 3·54; p=0·0004)., Interpretation: CDH1 PV/LPVs were positively associated with HDGC-related phenotypes (lobular breast cancer, diffuse gastric cancer, and gastric cancer), and no evidence for a positive association with these phenotypes was found for CDH1 missense variants of unknown significance. CDH1 PV/LPVs occurred often in families with lobular breast cancer who did not fulfil the 2020 HDGC criteria, supporting the expansion of lobular breast cancer-centred criteria., Funding: European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes, European Regional Development Fund, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal), Cancer Research UK, and European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DGE declares fees from Astrazeneca and Recursion. ERW declares grants from International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection, for which they are codirector of the research domain. GNR declares receipt of funding for study materials, medical writing, and article processing charges from Italian Ministry of Education (GNR). MJLL declares consulting fees (via the Radboud University Medical Center) from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), AstraZeneca, Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Illumina, GlaxoSmithKline. PRB declares fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and is a scientific committee member for the Geneticancer patients association. JBa declares fees from AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Pfizer. SA is a member of APC subVCEP of the InSiGHT/ClinGen Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel; is an unpaid member of the German Gene Diagnostics Commission and speaker of the Centre for Hereditary Tumour Syndromes of the University of Bonn. RH declares grants from SLA Pharma and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Janssen and One Two Therapeutics; equipment from Fujifilm; is the head of German Consortium for Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer; and is an unpaid advisory board member of the Lynch Syndrome advocacy Group and the Familial Polyposis Group. ES declares grants from NCT/DKTK Master. ES declares honoraria for presentations from AstraZeneca, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, and payment for expert testimony from Illumina; is a member of the board of directors of Deutsche Gesellschaft für HumanGenetik; an advisor for Dresden-concept Genome Center; and is board of directors president (paid) for LNS laboratoire National de Santé. RdP declares support for presentations (via his institution) from MSD and AstraZeneca. GC declares to receive funding for study materials, medical writing, article processing charges from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III CIBERONC, and the Government of Catalonia.; consulting fees from VCN Biosciences Synthetic Biologics; is the chair of the Council of the International Society of Hereditary Gastrointestinal Tumours and the FUREGA Fundació Recerca en Gastroenterologia; and stock in Synthetic Biologics. CLa declares consulting fees and honoraria from AstraZeneca and MSD, and is a paid advisory board member for Illumina., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Ovarian cancer is known for its poor prognosis, which is mainly due to the lack of early symptoms and adequate screening options. In this study we evaluated whether mutational analysis in cervicovaginal and endometrial samples could assist in the detection of ovarian cancer., Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, we included patients surgically treated for either (suspicion of) ovarian cancer or for a benign gynecological condition (control group). A cervicovaginal self-sample, a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, a pipelle endometrial biopsy, and the surgical specimen were analyzed for (potentially) pathogenic variants in eight genes ( ARID1A , CTNNB1 , KRAS , MTOR , PIK3CA , POLE , PTEN , and TP53 ) using single-molecule molecular inversion probes. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy., Results: Based on surgical histology, our dataset comprised 29 patients with ovarian cancer and 32 controls. In 83% of the patients with ovarian cancer, somatic (potentially) pathogenic variants could be detected in the final surgical specimen, of which 71% included at least a TP53 variant. In 52% of the ovarian cancer patients, such variants could be detected in either the self-sample, Pap smear, or pipelle. The Pap smear yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy with 26% sensitivity (95% CI 10% to 48%). Overall diagnostic accuracy was low and was not improved when including TP53 variants only., Conclusions: Mutational analysis in cervicovaginal and endometrial samples has limited accuracy in the detection of ovarian cancer. Future research with cytologic samples analyzed on methylation status or the vaginal microbiome may be relevant., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of 5-10% in advanced cases, highlighting the need for more effective therapies. The aim of this study was to identify potentially actionable therapeutic targets for GBC. Specimens and clinicopathological data of 642 GBC patients, diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 were collected using the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All cases were histologically reviewed and a subset was subjected to a comprehensive next generation sequencing panel. We assessed mutations and gene amplifications in a panel of 54 actionable genes, tumor-mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). Additionally, the entire cohort was screened for HER2, PD-L1, pan-TRK, and p53 expression with immunohistochemistry. Histopathological subtypes comprised biliary-type adenocarcinoma (AC, 69.6%), intestinal-type AC (20.1%) and other subtypes (10.3%). The median total TMB was 5.5 mutations/Mb (range: 0-161.1) and 17.7% of evaluable cases had a TMB of >10 mutations/Mb. MSI was observed in two cases. Apart from mutations in TP53 (64%), tumors were molecularly highly heterogeneous. Half of the tumors (50%) carried at least one molecular alteration that is targetable in other tumor types, including alterations in CDKN2A (6.0% biallelically inactivated), ERBB2 (9.3%) and PIK3CA (10%). Immunohistochemistry results correlated well with NGS results for HER2 and p53: Pearson r = 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. As half of GBC patients carry at least one potentially actionable molecular alteration, molecular testing may open the way to explore targeted therapy options for GBC patients., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: To compare colorectal cancer (CRC) incidences in carriers of pathogenic variants of the MMR genes in the PLSD and IMRC cohorts, of which only the former included mandatory colonoscopy surveillance for all participants., Methods: CRC incidences were calculated in an intervention group comprising a cohort of confirmed carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (path&#95;MMR) followed prospectively by the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD). All had colonoscopy surveillance, with polypectomy when polyps were identified. Comparison was made with a retrospective cohort reported by the International Mismatch Repair Consortium (IMRC). This comprised confirmed and inferred path&#95;MMR carriers who were first- or second-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands., Results: In the PLSD, 8,153 subjects had follow-up colonoscopy surveillance for a total of 67,604 years and 578 carriers had CRC diagnosed. Average cumulative incidences of CRC in path&#95;MLH1 carriers at 70 years of age were 52% in males and 41% in females; for path&#95;MSH2 50% and 39%; for path&#95;MSH6 13% and 17% and for path&#95;PMS2 11% and 8%. In contrast, in the IMRC cohort, corresponding cumulative incidences were 40% and 27%; 34% and 23%; 16% and 8% and 7% and 6%. Comparing just the European carriers in the two series gave similar findings. Numbers in the PLSD series did not allow comparisons of carriers from other continents separately. Cumulative incidences at 25 years were < 1% in all retrospective groups., Conclusions: Prospectively observed CRC incidences (PLSD) in path&#95;MLH1 and path&#95;MSH2 carriers undergoing colonoscopy surveillance and polypectomy were higher than in the retrospective (IMRC) series, and were not reduced in path&#95;MSH6 carriers. These findings were the opposite to those expected. CRC point incidence before 50 years of age was reduced in path&#95;PMS2 carriers subjected to colonoscopy, but not significantly so., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Patients diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal cancer are often treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. This study explored whether detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma can be used to predict residual disease during treatment. Diagnostic tissue biopsies from patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery were analyzed for tumor-specific mutations. These tumor-informed mutations were used to measure the presence of ctDNA in serially collected plasma samples using hybrid capture-based sequencing. Plasma samples were obtained before chemoradiotherapy, and prior to surgery. The association between ctDNA detection and progression-free and overall survival was measured. Before chemoradiotherapy, ctDNA was detected in 56% (44/78) of patients and detection was associated with tumor stage and volume ( p = 0.05, Fisher exact and p = 0.02, Mann-Whitney, respectively). After chemoradiotherapy, ctDNA was detected in 10% (8/78) of patients. This preoperative detection of ctDNA was independently associated with recurrent disease (hazard ratio 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.8, p = 0.03, multivariable Cox-regression) and worse overall survival (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2-7.1, p = 0.02, multivariable Cox-regression).Ultradeep sequencing-based detection of ctDNA in preoperative plasma of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer may help to assess which patients have a high risk of recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery.