146 results on '"Liekens, Inge"'
Search Results
2. Partial attribute attendance in environmental choice experiments: A comparative case study between Guangzhou (China) and Brussels (Belgium)
3. Increasing uptake of ecosystem service assessments : best practice check-lists for practitioners in Europe
4. Valuing urban ecosystem services in sustainable brownfield redevelopment
5. Integrating Ecosystem Services values for sustainability? Evidence from the Belgium Ecosystem Services community of practice
6. Preference heterogeneity and scale heterogeneity in urban river restoration: A comparative study between Brussels and Guangzhou using discrete choice experiments
7. Outdoor recreation in various landscapes: Which site characteristics really matter?
8. Quantification of the potential impact of nature conservation on ecosystem services supply in the Flemish Region: A cascade modelling approach
9. Contrasting collective preferences for outdoor recreation and substitutability of nature areas using hot spot mapping
10. Valuation of health benefits of green-blue areas for the purpose of ecosystem accounting: a pilot in Flanders, Belgium
11. Emerging ecosystem services governance issues in the Belgium ecosystem services community of practice
12. Identifying Societal Preferences for River Restoration in a Densely Populated Urban Environment: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Central Brussels
13. Testing the Influence of Substitute Sites in Nature Valuation by Using Spatial Discounting Factors
14. An ecosystem service approach to support integrated pond management: A case study using Bayesian belief networks – Highlighting opportunities and risks
15. Accounting for the recreation benefits of the Flemish Natura 2000 network through landscape preferences and estimated spending
16. Transformative Change Needs Direction
17. Temporal stability of preferences and willingness to pay for natural areas in choice experiments: A test–retest
18. Benefits of clearing forest plantations to restore nature? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium
19. Recommendations for a sustainable spatial development of the Oudland polder
20. Valuation of health benefits of green-blue areas for the purpose of ecosystem accounting: a pilot in Flanders, Belgium
21. A web application to support the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services
22. Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium
23. Transformative change needs direction
24. Impact of Perceived Importance of Ecosystem Services and Stated Financial Constraints on Willingness to Pay for Riparian Meadow Restoration in Flanders (Belgium)
25. Commuting by bike in Belgium, the costs of minor accidents
26. Designing a long-term flood risk management plan for the Scheldt estuary using a risk-based approach
27. Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making : Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies
28. Valuation of ES
29. CICES Going Local
30. The Ecosystem Services Valuation Tool and its Future Developments
31. Ecosystem Services and Their Monetary Value
32. Contributors
33. Supplementary material 1 from: Geneletti D, Adem Esmail B, Cortinovis C, Arany I, Balzan M, van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges PA, Borisova B, Broekx S, Burkhard B, Gil A, Inghe O, Kopperoinen L, Kruse M, Liekens I, Lowicki D, Mizgajski A, Mulder S, Nedkov S, Ostergard H, Picanço A, Ruskule A, Santos-Martín F, Sieber IM, Svensson J, Vačkářů D, Veidemane K (2020) Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies. One Ecosystem 5: e53111. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111
34. De betalingsbereidheid van de Vlaming voor het behoud van bouwkundig en landschappelijk erfgoed
35. Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies
36. Supplementary material 2 from: Vrebos D, Staes J, Broekx S, de Nocker L, Gabriels K, Hermy M, Liekens I, Marsboom C, Ottoy S, Van Der Biest K, van Orshoven J, Meire P (2020) Facilitating spatially-explicit assessments of ecosystem service delivery to support land use planning. One Ecosystem 5: e50540. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e50540
37. Supplementary material 3 from: Vrebos D, Staes J, Broekx S, de Nocker L, Gabriels K, Hermy M, Liekens I, Marsboom C, Ottoy S, Van Der Biest K, van Orshoven J, Meire P (2020) Facilitating spatially-explicit assessments of ecosystem service delivery to support land use planning. One Ecosystem 5: e50540. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e50540
38. Facilitating spatially-explicit assessments of ecosystem service delivery to support land use planning
39. Supplementary material 1 from: Vrebos D, Staes J, Broekx S, de Nocker L, Gabriels K, Hermy M, Liekens I, Marsboom C, Ottoy S, Van Der Biest K, van Orshoven J, Meire P (2020) Facilitating spatially-explicit assessments of ecosystem service delivery to support land use planning. One Ecosystem 5: e50540. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e50540
40. Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU:Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration
41. Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration
42. Which questions drive the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy?
43. Report on Economic Mapping and Assessment Methods for Ecosystem Services: Deliverable D3.2
44. Report on Economic Mapping and Assessment Methods for Ecosystem Services:Deliverable D3.2
45. Report illustrating the application of the final methods in policy and decision-making : Deliverable D5.3, EU Horizon 2020 ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007
46. Report on Social Mapping and Assessment Methods for Ecosystem Services
47. ECOPLAN-SE : ruimtelijke analyse van ecosysteemdiensten in Vlaanderen, een Q-GIS plugin, versie 1.0
48. ECOPLAN-SE: Ruimtelijke analyse van ecosysteemdiensten in Vlaanderen, een Q-GIS plugin
49. Supplementary material 1 from: Burkhard B, Maes J, Potschin-Young M, Santos-Martín F, Geneletti D, Stoev P, Kopperoinen L, Adamescu C, Adem Esmail B, Arany I, Arnell A, Balzan M, Barton D, van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges P, Borisova B, Braat L, M Brander L, Bratanova-Doncheva S, Broekx S, Brown C, Cazacu C, Crossman N, Czúcz B, Daněk J, Groot R, Depellegrin D, Dimopoulos P, Elvinger N, Erhard M, Fagerholm N, Frélichová J, Grêt-Regamey A, Grudova M, Haines-Young R, Inghe O, Kallay T, Kirin T, Klug H, Kokkoris I, Konovska I, Kruse M, Kuzmova I, Lange M, Liekens I, Lotan A, Lowicki D, Luque S, Marta-Pedroso C, Mizgajski A, Mononen L, Mulder S, Müller F, Nedkov S, Nikolova M, Östergård H, Penev L, Pereira P, Pitkänen K, Plieninger T, Rabe S, Reichel S, Roche P, Rusch G, Ruskule A, Sapundzhieva A, Sepp K, Sieber I, Šmid Hribar M, Stašová S, Steinhoff-Knopp B, Stępniewska M, Teller A, Vackar D, van Weelden M, Veidemane K, Vejre H, Vihervaara P, Viinikka A, Villoslada M, Weibel B, Zulian G (2018) Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration. One Ecosystem 3: e29153. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e29153
50. Supplementary material 2 from: Burkhard B, Maes J, Potschin-Young M, Santos-Martín F, Geneletti D, Stoev P, Kopperoinen L, Adamescu C, Adem Esmail B, Arany I, Arnell A, Balzan M, Barton D, van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges P, Borisova B, Braat L, M Brander L, Bratanova-Doncheva S, Broekx S, Brown C, Cazacu C, Crossman N, Czúcz B, Daněk J, Groot R, Depellegrin D, Dimopoulos P, Elvinger N, Erhard M, Fagerholm N, Frélichová J, Grêt-Regamey A, Grudova M, Haines-Young R, Inghe O, Kallay T, Kirin T, Klug H, Kokkoris I, Konovska I, Kruse M, Kuzmova I, Lange M, Liekens I, Lotan A, Lowicki D, Luque S, Marta-Pedroso C, Mizgajski A, Mononen L, Mulder S, Müller F, Nedkov S, Nikolova M, Östergård H, Penev L, Pereira P, Pitkänen K, Plieninger T, Rabe S, Reichel S, Roche P, Rusch G, Ruskule A, Sapundzhieva A, Sepp K, Sieber I, Šmid Hribar M, Stašová S, Steinhoff-Knopp B, Stępniewska M, Teller A, Vackar D, van Weelden M, Veidemane K, Vejre H, Vihervaara P, Viinikka A, Villoslada M, Weibel B, Zulian G (2018) Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration. One Ecosystem 3: e29153. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e29153
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.