Search

Introduction: Ukraine's health and trauma system has been detrimentally impacted since the Russian Federation invasion in February 2022. The number and extent of injuries experienced in Ukraine because of trench warfare and high-intensity large-scale combat operations has not been seen in recent conflicts. Understanding attitudes and perceptions around the use of devices and products including MOVES (monitor, oxygen concentrator, ventilator, and suction system) and its use in the large-scale combat operation environment can inform lessons learned for improved prehospital care in Ukraine, as well as in other future conflicts., Material and Methods: We conducted qualitative key informant interviews with military and civilian Ukrainian health care workers during the ongoing conflict using an expanded version of the Global Trauma System Evaluation Tool. We focused the analysis on identifying and understanding the capability of MOVES Micro-integrated Life Support System (SLC)., Results: Thirty-six participants were interviewed; 56% were military and 44% were civilians and representative of all NATO roles or levels of care. Sixty-one percent of participants were male. Seventy-two percent of participants were stationed in the Eastern and Northern regions. The mean age was 34.9 years. Sixty-seven percent of care providers reported using MOVES SLC and the remainder stated they wanted the device. The device was sometimes referenced as a "portable ventilator." Of other donated surgical equipment, MOVES SLC was described as "unique." A stabilization modification was suggested as a need given the ad hoc vehicles used for en-route critical care. Participants reacted positively to using MOVES SLC and the capabilities and improvements in care that MOVES SLC can provide for en-route care of critically injured patients., Conclusions: MOVES SLC is well regarded by Ukrainian trauma care providers. Training may be necessary to increase the quality of care when utilizing these devices, and vehicle modifications may be necessary for use given some concerns over the equipment falling during transport. There is a need to study how this equipment improves the ability of limited medical personnel to provide prolonged care for a larger number of patients with reduced medical resupply., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2024. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Introduction: The U.S. military has a 50-year history of managing resettlement or refugee camps on bases. In July and August 2021, more than 124,000 persons were evacuated from Afghanistan, with 55,000 Afghans temporarily housed at U.S. military bases around the world during Operation Allies Welcome (OAW) at its peak., Methods: PubMed was searched for papers published in English between January 1, 1980, and February 1, 2021, using "Afghanistan" and "health" (including "public health," "maternal health," and "child health"), "maternal, newborn, and child health," and "health situation" as search terms and specific topics of interest. Where scholarly work was unavailable, reports of the United States Agency for International Development, implementing partners, gray literature, donor reports, Afghanistan Ministry of Health documents, national health plans, policies, and strategies, DoD after-action reviews (AARs), and guidance from previous refugee airlifts were also included in the search., Results: Although AARs may provide some helpful guidance for these refugee settings, a review of open-source AARs and had little to no health guidance, focused primarily on administrative issues, and do not follow humanitarian guidelines. DoD guidance for refugee settings is dated and requires updating to be useful. There is a well-developed body of literature of international standards, guidelines, and best practices for refugee settings. Using the standardized Needs Assessment for Refugee Emergencies checklist as a guide, this review provides a standardized refugee health assessment framework for ensuring the health and well-being of Afghan refugees on U.S. military bases is based on humanitarian response guidelines and best practices to ensure their care meets international standards. All groups, especially minority ethnic groups (e.g., Hazaras), sexual and gender minorities, elderly, disabled, or mentally ill persons, need equal access to protection to ensure they are not targeted. Water, sanitation, and hygiene must be gender-sensitive and inclusive which includes well-lit separate facilities for males and females to decrease vulnerability to violence. The displaced population must be involved in the management of the camp through community participation and representation. All providers in OAW should be briefed on the food security and nutrition context of those in their care. Medical providers are most effective if they have significant experience with the refugee population health context. Understanding refugee medicine, the ability to work with illiterate and uneducated populations and translators are important skills. Abiding by international standards of care and being up-to-date with current guidelines for refugee care is important. Reproductive health must be a core component of the overall health response to decrease mortality, morbidity, and disability among reproductive-age women in crisis situations. Immediate and exclusive breastfeeding and international standards for breastfeeding must be adhered to, especially among nutritionally at-risk Afghans who are part of OAW. Education implementors familiar with education in refugee settings are an important contributor to establish formal, informal, non-formal, accelerated, and essence-based education programs., Conclusions: Partners and providers involved in any refugee setting should become familiar with updated guidelines, standards, and best practices and apply them to any operation to ensure a rights-based approach to protection, care, and the health and well-being of refugees., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2022. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Objectives: To understand the prevalence of mental health disorders in Ebola-affected communities and their association with condom use., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: Beni, Butembo and Katwa health zones, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)., Participants: 223 adult Ebola survivors, 102 sexual partners and 74 comparison respondents., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, substance use, suicidal ideation and attempts, stigma, condom use and sexual behaviour., Results: Most respondents reported to be married, Christian, from the Nande ethnic group, and farmers/herders. Survivors met symptom criteria for depression at higher rates than partners (23.5% (95% CI 18.0 to 29.1) vs 5.7 (1.2 to 10.1); p<0.001). PTSD symptom criteria for survivors (24.1%, 95% CI 18.5% to 29.7%) and partners (16.7%, 95% CI 9.4% to 23.9%) were four times greater than the comparison participants (6.0%, 95% CI 0.6% to 11.4%). Two times as many survivors as partners reported that sexual activity precautions were discussed at discharge (71.5% (95% CI 65.6 to 77.5) vs 36.2% (95% CI 26.9 to 45.5); p<0.001). The majority of survivors (95.0 (95% CI 85.1% to 98.5%) and partners 98.5% (95% CI 89.6% to 99.8%; p=0.26) participated in risky sexual behaviour after the survivor left the Ebola treatment centre. The ability to refuse sex or insist on condom use before Ebola had a threefold increase in the odds of condom use (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.1, p<0.001). Up to 36% of the comparison group held discriminatory views of survivors., Conclusions: The new outbreaks in both Guinea and DRC show Ebola remains in semen longer than previously known. Understanding and addressing condom non-use and updating condom use guidelines are necessary to protect against future Ebola outbreaks, especially among sexual partners who did not have similar access to health information regarding sexual transmission of Ebola. Mental health treatment and decreasing stigma in Ebola areas is a priority., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)