Search

Augmented Lagrangian Methods (ALMs) are widely employed in solving constrained optimizations, and some efficient solvers are developed based on this framework. Under the quadratic growth assumption, it is known that the dual iterates and the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) residuals of ALMs applied to semidefinite programs (SDPs) converge linearly. In contrast, the convergence rate of the primal iterates has remained elusive. In this paper, we resolve this challenge by establishing new $\textit{quadratic growth}$ and $\textit{error bound}$ properties for primal and dual SDPs under the strict complementarity condition. Our main results reveal that both primal and dual iterates of the ALMs converge linearly contingent solely upon the assumption of strict complementarity and a bounded solution set. This finding provides a positive answer to an open question regarding the asymptotically linear convergence of the primal iterates of ALMs applied to semidefinite optimization., Comment: 32 pages, 5 figures

Many practical optimization problems lack strong convexity. Fortunately, recent studies have revealed that first-order algorithms also enjoy linear convergences under various weaker regularity conditions. While the relationship among different conditions for convex and smooth functions is well-understood, it is not the case for the nonsmooth setting. In this paper, we go beyond convexity and smoothness, and clarify the connections among common regularity conditions in the class of weakly convex functions, including $\textit{strong convexity}$, $\textit{restricted secant inequality}$, $\textit{subdifferential error bound}$, $\textit{Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz inequality}$, and $\textit{quadratic growth}$. In addition, using these regularity conditions, we present a simple and modular proof for the linear convergence of the proximal point method (PPM) for convex and weakly convex optimization problems. The linear convergence also holds when the subproblems of PPM are solved inexactly with a proper control of inexactness., Comment: 29 pages, 3 figures, and 1 table

The spectral bundle method developed by Helmberg and Rendl is well-established for solving large-scale semidefinite programs (SDPs) in the dual form, especially when the SDPs admit $\textit{low-rank primal solutions}$. Under mild regularity conditions, a recent result by Ding and Grimmer has established fast linear convergence rates when the bundle method captures $\textit{the rank of primal solutions}$. In this paper, we present an overview and comparison of spectral bundle methods for solving both $\textit{primal}$ and $\textit{dual}$ SDPs. In particular, we introduce a new family of spectral bundle methods for solving SDPs in the $\textit{primal}$ form. The algorithm developments are parallel to those by Helmberg and Rendl, mirroring the elegant duality between primal and dual SDPs. The new family of spectral bundle methods also achieves linear convergence rates for primal feasibility, dual feasibility, and duality gap when the algorithm captures $\textit{the rank of the dual solutions}$. Therefore, the original spectral bundle method by Helmberg and Rendl is well-suited for SDPs with $\textit{low-rank primal solutions}$, while on the other hand, our new spectral bundle method works well for SDPs with $\textit{low-rank dual solutions}$. These theoretical findings are supported by a range of large-scale numerical experiments. Finally, we demonstrate that our new spectral bundle method achieves state-of-the-art efficiency and scalability for solving polynomial optimization compared to a set of baseline solvers $\textsf{SDPT3}$, $\textsf{MOSEK}$, $\textsf{CDCS}$, and $\textsf{SDPNAL+}$., Comment: 57 pages, 4 figures, and 4 tables

In this paper, we propose iterative inner/outer approximations based on a recent notion of block factor-width-two matrices for solving semidefinite programs (SDPs). Our inner/outer approximating algorithms generate a sequence of upper/lower bounds of increasing accuracy for the optimal SDP cost. The block partition in our algorithms offers flexibility in terms of both numerical efficiency and solution quality, which includes the approach of scaled diagonally dominance (SDD) approximation as a special case. We discuss both the theoretical results and numerical implementation in detail. Our main theorems guarantee that the proposed iterative algorithms generate monotonically decreasing upper (increasing lower) bounds. Extensive numerical results confirm our findings., Comment: 8 pages, 6 figures. Code is available through https://github.com/soc-ucsd/Iterative_SDPfw