Search

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reinvigorate anti-tumor immune responses by disrupting co-inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Although ICIs have had unprecedented success and have become the standard of care for many cancers, they are often accompanied by off-target inflammation that can occur in any organ system. These immune related adverse events (irAEs) often require steroid use and/or cessation of ICI therapy, which can both lead to cancer progression. Although irAEs are common, the detailed molecular and immune mechanisms underlying their development are still elusive. To further our understanding of irAEs and develop effective treatment options, there is pressing need for preclinical models recapitulating the clinical settings. In this review, we describe current preclinical models and immune implications of ICI-induced skin toxicities, colitis, neurological and endocrine toxicities, pneumonitis, arthritis, and myocarditis along with their management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved outcomes for patients with cancer. However, these therapies are associated with adverse events including de novo immune-related adverse events or flare of pre-exiting autoimmune disorders. Up to 80% of patients with cancer and pre-existing psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) experience PsO/PsA flare after initiating ICIs. Targeting the interleukin (IL)-17/IL-23 axis is a mainstream of the PsO/PsA treatment. However, whether this treatment can effectively control PsO/PsA with ICI exposure while preserving anti-tumour efficacy remains unknown., Case Reports: We report three patients with PsA and cancer, who received ICIs for their cancer treatment. All patients were male. Two patients had clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and one had melanoma. Two patients received anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy, while one patient received combined anti-CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibody therapy. One patient had been receiving anti-IL-17A antibody (secukinumab), while the other two patients started anti-IL-17A antibody (ixekizumab) and anti-IL-23 antibody (guselkumab) after their PsA flared up during ICI treatment. Of note, with the anti-IL-17A or anti-IL-23 antibody treatment, their PsA remained in remission, and they well tolerated the ICI therapy. Importantly, all three patients showed persistent tumour responses to ICI therapy, including two complete remissions and one stable disease, respectively., Conclusions: These three cases suggest that targeting the IL-17/23 axis may be an effective and safe approach for patients with cancer and pre-existing PsA being considered for ICI therapy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)