Search

Outcomes for adult-to-adult living liver donors (LDs) are largely based on short-term data drawn from single-center studies. The aim of this study was to determine how living liver donation (LLD) impacts self-reported quality-of-life (QOL) up to 6 years after donation in a sample of residents from New York State. New York transplant programs are state-mandated to track LDs as part of a quality assurance and patient safety effort. Donor-reported QOL within 1 year of donation and longitudinal data over a 10-year period were analyzed. Self-reported surveys include the following domains: employment, finances, health/life insurance, activities of daily living, physical/emotional health, donor experience, relationships, and LD opinions. There were 220 LDs in New York (2004-2013) who completed a survey over the 10-year period with many donors completing surveys at several points in time. Overall, longterm LDs remain as comfortable about LLD as they were during the first year after donation (95%). The majority of LDs reported feeling as well as before LLD (72%). At 1 year after donation, 60% of subjects self-reported medical problems, and 30% reported emotional issues. However, the majority reported that they would willingly donate again. In conclusion, LDs remain satisfied with their decision to donate over time. A minority of LDs report longterm medical and emotional issues. The conclusions provide information for educational interventions to improve informed choice to those considering donation.

BACKGROUND Literature supports equivalent kidney transplant outcomes in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with those without SLE. However, there are conflicting and scant data on kidney transplant outcomes, as well as controversy over optimal timing of transplantation, in children and adolescents with SLE. METHODS Analysis included kidney-only transplant recipients aged 2-21 years from 2000 to 2017 enrolled in the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN). The relationship between diagnosis (SLE n = 457, non-SLE glomerular disease n = 4492, and non-SLE non-glomerular disease n = 5605) and transplant outcomes was evaluated. The association between dialysis time and outcomes was analyzed in the SLE group only. RESULTS In adjusted models, SLE had higher mortality compared with non-SLE glomerular recipients (HR 1.24 CI 1.07-1.44) and non-glomerular recipients (HR 1.42 CI 1.20-1.70). SLE was associated with higher graft failure compared with non-SLE glomerular (HR 1.42 CI 1.20-1.69) and non-glomerular disease (HR 1.67 CI 1.22-2.28). SLE had a higher risk of acute rejection at 1 year compared with non-glomerular disease (HR 1.39 CI 1.03-1.88). There was a decreased risk of delayed graft function compared with non-SLE glomerular disease (HR 0.54, CI 0.36-0.82). There were no significant associations between dialysis time and transplant outcomes in the SLE group. CONCLUSION SLE in children and adolescents is associated with worse patient and graft survival compared with non-SLE diagnoses. Outcomes in children and adolescents with SLE are not associated with dialysis time. Further studies are needed to assess implications of potential earlier transplantation and shorter time on dialysis prior to transplantation.

BACKGROUND Deceased donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are viable sources of organs. The outcomes of renal transplantation from DCD donors with AKI are not known. METHODS A retrospective review of deceased donor renal transplants performed from 2006 to 2016 was conducted using the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset. Donors were stratified by DCD or brain dead status and by AKI stage. Recipients were followed until graft failure or the end of study. Cox regression was used to adjust for donor, recipient, and transplant covariates known to affect the incidence of delayed graft function and graft survival. RESULTS A total of 135 644 patients were included in the study. The odds of delayed graft function among DCD recipients were significantly higher across all donor AKI stages. The unadjusted risk of overall and death-censored graft failure were similar between the 2 groups. After adjusting for covariates, there was a significant increase in the risk of overall graft failure in recipients of DCD allografts from donors with stage 2 AKI. There was also a higher risk of death-censored graft failure among stage 1 and 2 AKI DCD recipients. CONCLUSIONS DCD renal allografts from donors experiencing stage 1 and 2 AKI have a higher adjusted risk of death-censored graft failure than AKI stage-matched donation after brain death renal allografts. Their use, however, is still associated with improved outcomes compared with waitlist mortality.

The pharmacokinetics of once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus tablets (LCPT) in de novo liver transplantation have not been previously reported. In this phase II, randomized, open‐label study, de novo liver transplant recipients were randomized to LCPT 0.07–0.13 mg/kg/day (taken once daily; n = 29) or twice‐daily immediate‐release tacrolimus capsules (IR‐Tac) at 0.10–0.15 mg/kg/day (divided twice daily; n = 29). Subsequent doses of both drugs were adjusted to maintain tacrolimus trough concentrations of 5 to 20 ng/mL through day 90, and 5–15 ng/mL thereafter. Twenty‐four‐hour pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on days 1, 7, and 14, with trough concentration and efficacy/safety monitoring through year 1. Similar proportions of patients in both groups achieved therapeutic trough concentrations on days 7 and 14 (day 7: LCPT = 78%, IR‐Tac = 75%; day 14: LCPT = 86%, IR‐Tac = 91%) as well as similar systemic and peak exposure. There was a robust correlation between drug concentration at time 0 and area under the concentration‐time curve for both LCPT and IR‐Tac (respectively, day 7: r = 0.86 and 0.79; day 14: r = 0.93 and 0.86; P < .0001 for all). Dose adjustments during days 1 to 14 were frequent. Thirty‐five patients completed the extended‐use period. No significant differences in adverse events were seen between groups. Incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (LCPT = 6 and IR‐Tac = 4) was similar on day 360. Between formulations, overall exposure was similar at 1 week after transplant with the characteristic delayed‐release pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT demonstrated in this novel population. These data support further investigation of the safety and efficacy of LCPT in de novo liver transplantation.

Morbid obesity is considered a relative contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). We investigated if body mass index (BMI; lean versus obese) is a risk factor for post-LT graft and overall survival in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and non-NASH patients. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, LT recipients from January 2002 to June 2013 (age ≥18 years) with follow-up until 2017 were included. The association of BMI categories calculated at LT with graft and overall survival after LT were examined. After adjusting for confounders, all obesity cohorts (overweight and class 1, class 2, and class 3 obesity) among LT recipients for NASH had significantly reduced risk of graft and patient loss at 10 years of follow-up compared with the lean BMI cohort. In contrast, the non-NASH group of LT recipients had no increased risk for graft and patient loss for overweight, class 1, and class 2 obesity groups but had significantly increased risk for graft (P < 0.001) and patient loss (P = 0.005) in the class 3 obesity group. In this retrospective analysis of the UNOS database, adult recipients selected for first LT and NASH patients with the lowest BMI have the worse longterm graft and patient survival as opposed to non-NASH patients where the survival was worse with higher BMI.

Background A recent randomized phase III study of 719 de novo liver transplant recipients showed that early everolimus plus reduced-dose tacrolimus (EVR + rTAC) led to significantly better kidney function than standard TAC (TAC-C), without compromising efficacy. In that study, patients from North America (n = 211) had increased risk factors for posttransplant renal insufficiency at study start, relative to patients from Europe and rest of world (eg, worse renal function, more diabetes, older age). Methods A post hoc analysis was performed to assess whether these regional disparities affected study outcomes in North American patients. Results In this subpopulation, estimated glomerular filtration rates at randomization were higher in TAC-C over EVR + rTAC (76.4 vs 69.3 mL/min per 1.73 m2). Mean changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate values (mL/min per 1.73 m2) favored EVR + rTAC over TAC-C at months 12 (+3.7 vs −4.5; P = 0.032), 24 (+2.7 vs −6.6; P = 0.042), and 36 (+4.3 vs −8.1; P = 0.059). The composite efficacy endpoint of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death was 10.9%, 14.1%, and 14.1% for EVR + rTAC and 13.1%, 17.2%, and 19.3% for TAC-C at months 12, 24, and 36, respectively. Conclusions Although the North American cohort had more comorbidities, results were consistent with the overall population for efficacy and renal function., In order to reduce nephrotoxicity in liver transplantation, several strategies are being explored including early everolimus-facilitated tacrolimus dose reduction, which in a recent multicenter study led to better kidney function versus standard TAC without compromising efficacy. In this North American cohort sub-analysis, results are similar despite higher baseline comorbidities.

Background & Aims There are no effective and safe treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of patients who have advanced liver disease. Methods In this phase 2, open-label study, we assessed treatment with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir, the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, and ribavirin in patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 or 4. Cohort A enrolled patients with cirrhosis and moderate or severe hepatic impairment who had not undergone liver transplantation. Cohort B enrolled patients who had undergone liver transplantation: those without cirrhosis; those with cirrhosis and mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment; and those with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive 12 or 24 weeks of a fixed-dose combination tablet containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, once daily, plus ribavirin. The primary end point was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Results We enrolled 337 patients, 332 (99%) with HCV genotype 1 infection and 5 (1%) with HCV genotype 4 infection. In cohort A (nontransplant), SVR12 was achieved by 86%–89% of patients. In cohort B (transplant recipients), SVR12 was achieved by 96%–98% of patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, by 85%−88% of patients with moderate hepatic impairment, by 60%–75% of patients with severe hepatic impairment, and by all 6 patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Response rates in the 12- and 24-week groups were similar. Thirteen patients (4%) discontinued the ledipasvir and sofosbuvir combination prematurely because of adverse events; 10 patients died, mainly from complications related to hepatic decompensation. Conclusion The combination of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin for 12 weeks produced high rates of SVR12 in patients with advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation. ClinTrials.gov: NCT01938430.

In many instances, kidney transplants cannot be performed because of incompatibility (such as blood type or cross-match) among donors and recipients. One established way to address this finding is by means of donor exchanges, where incompatible pairs are enrolled in a registry. Registries can lead t

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of acute and chronic liver disease associated with exposure of brain tissue to excessive levels of ammonia produced by intestinal bacteria. Clinical manifestations range from subtle neurologic abnormalities to coma. Because development of HE can reduce survival probability, guidelines for evaluating patients for liver transplantation suggest that patients who develop HE should be considered for transplantation. Various patient factors before transplantation, including the presence of HE and reduced nutritional status, may increase the risk of poor outcomes after transplantation. Therefore, effective management of HE before transplantation, while minimizing the potential impact of negative predictive factors, may improve transplantation outcomes. The most common HE treatments are directed toward reducing systemic ammonia levels, thereby reducing brain exposure to this neurotoxin. The administration of nonabsorbable disaccharides is considered as a first-line therapy for HE, and the antibiotics neomycin and metronidazole are frequently administered, despite a lack of clinical data supporting their efficacy. These agents are associated with adverse events that may reduce nutritional status in patients awaiting transplantation and could contribute to poor posttransplantation outcomes. The nonsystemic antibiotic rifaximin has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of HE and has a favorable safety profile. Given these data, nonsystemic antibiotics may also provide a safe and effective option for treating HE in the pretransplant setting. This article reviews treatments for HE and the potential impact these treatments may have on pretransplantation status of patients awaiting liver transplantation and on posttransplantation outcomes.

Recurrence of hepatitis C is a significant problem after liver transplantation. This prospective study was done to assess the rate of recurrence and discuss two possible treatment modalities that have been successful in avoiding retransplantation. Twenty-one patients underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C at a metropolitan medical center over a 34-month period. The mean follow-up interval was 13.4 ±2.2 months (range 5–28 months). The patients were routinely evaluated with clinic visits and liver function tests, specifically total bilirubin, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase. If values were elevated, the patient was admitted to the hospital for liver biopsy. Ten of the 21 patients demonstrated recurrence on biopsy. Two of 10 patients required no therapy. Interferon A was initiated in the remaining eight. Three of the eight patients had no significant response to interferon and were given intravenous ribavirin under an experimental protocol. Two of these three showed significant improvement in liver function values. The third died of chronic rejection. The incidence of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is significant. Many centers have had to resort to retransplantation. Our results show that with early detection and aggressive treatment with interferon and ribavirin, hepatitis C can be controlled and retransplantation may be avoided.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) have been used for calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization to reduce nephrotoxicity following liver transplantation. In this prospective, open-label, multicenter study, patients undergoing transplantation from July 2005 to June 2007 who were maintained on MMF/CNI were randomized 4 to 12 weeks after transplantation to receive MMF/SRL (n = 148) or continue MMF/CNI (n = 145) and included in the intent-to-treat population. The primary efficacy endpoints were the mean percentage change in the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft lost, death, and lost to follow-up 12 months after transplantation. Patients were followed for a median of 519 days after randomization. MMF/SRL was associated with a significantly greater renal function improvement from baseline with a mean percentage change in GFR of 19.7 ± 40.6 (versus 1.2 ± 39.9 for MMF/CNI, P = 0.0012). The composite endpoint demonstrated the noninferiority of MMF/SRL versus MMF/CNI (16.4% versus 15.4%, 90% confidence interval = -7.1% to 9.0%). The incidence of BPAR was significantly greater with MMF/SRL (12.2%) versus MMF/CNI (4.1%, P = 0.02). Graft loss (including death) occurred in 3.4% of the MMF/SRL-treated patients and in 8.3% of the MMF/CNI-treated patients (P = 0.04). Malignancy-related deaths were less frequent with MMF/SRL. Adverse events caused withdrawal for 34.2% of the MMF/SRL-treated patients and for 24.1% of the MMF/CNI-treated patients (P = 0.06). The use of MMF/SRL is an option for liver transplant recipients who can benefit from improved renal function but is associated with an increased risk of rejection (but not graft loss).

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common disease indication for liver transplantation (LT). Outcomes are compromised by near universal recurrence of HCV. A prospective multi-center randomized study to evaluate immunosuppressive strategies in HCV+ transplant recipients provided the opportunity to assess impact of live donor (LD) LT. Two hundred and ninety-five patients undergoing LT for HCV (260 deceased donor [DD] recipients/35 LD recipients), randomized to three regimens, were followed for two yr for patient and graft survival and rate and severity of recurrent HCV. Biopsies were performed at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. One- and two-yr patient survival for LD recipients was 88.1% and 81.1% vs. 90.5% and 84.6% for DD recipients (p = 0.5665). One- and two-yr graft survival for LD recipients was 82.9% and 76.2% vs. 87.9% and 81.7% for DD recipients (p = 0.3921). Recurrent HCV did not account for more deaths or graft losses in the LD recipients. In this prospective study, controlled for immunosuppression, use of LD organs did not increase the rate or severity of HCV recurrence. The more elective nature of LDLT affords an opportunity to manipulate donor and recipient factors that can impact upon outcomes.

Hemangioma is the most common benign tumor of the liver. Unlike cavernous hemangioma, hepatic capillary or mixed capillary-cavernous hemangioma is a rare type of tumor in adults. Clinical presentation of hemangioma may mimic that of hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, radiologic features on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging may not be typical for hemangioma and can be confused with hepatocellular carcinoma. Symptomatic hemangiomas require some form of treatment, such as corticosteroids, interferon, radiation, arterial embolization, surgical resection, or liver transplant. In the present case study, we present a patient treated with liver transplant for hemangioma mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma. This case report illustrates the atypical imaging appearance of hemangioma and possible confusion it can cause in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma, especially in a hepatitis C carrier.

To assess the accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements obtained with low-contrast agent dose dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) renography in patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent routine liver MR imaging, with urinary clearance of technetium 99m ((99m)Tc) pentetic acid (DTPA) as the reference standard.This HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved. Written informed patient consent was obtained. Twenty patients with cirrhosis (14 men, six women; age range, 41-70 years; mean age, 54.6 years) who were scheduled for routine 1.5-T liver MR examinations to screen for hepatocellular carcinoma during a 6-month period were prospectively included. Five-minute MR renography with a 3-mL dose of gadoteridol was performed instead of a routine test-dose timing examination. The GFR was estimated at MR imaging with use of two kinetic models. In one model, only the signal intensities in the aorta and kidney parenchyma were considered, and in the other, renal cortical and medullary signal intensities were treated separately. The GFR was also calculated by using serum creatinine levels according to the Cockcroft-Gault and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formulas. All patients underwent a (99m)Tc-DTPA urinary clearance examination on the same day to obtain a reference GFR measurement. The accuracies of all MR- and creatinine-based GFR estimations were compared by using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.The mean reference GFR, based on (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance, was 74.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ± 27.7 (standard deviation) (range, 10.3-120.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). With both kinetic models, 95% of MR-based GFRs were within 30% of the reference values, whereas only 40% and 60% of Cockcroft-Gault- and MDRD-based GFRs, respectively, were within this range. MR-based GFR estimates were significantly more accurate than creatinine level-based estimates (P.001).GFR assessment with MR imaging, which outperformed the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas, adds less than 10 minutes of table time to a clinically indicated liver MR examination without ionizing radiation.http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101338/-/DC1.

The number of liver donors has not measurably increased since 2004 and has begun to decrease. Although many waitlisted patients may be suitable candidates to receive a living donor graft, they are often reticent to discuss living donation with close friends and family, partly because of a lack of knowledge about donor health and quality of life outcomes after donation. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of an educational intervention that uses testimonials and self-report data from living donors in New York State. The study had an independent sample pretest (n = 437) and posttest (n = 338) design with posttest, between-subjects comparison for intervention exposure. All waitlisted patients at 5 liver transplant centers in New York were provided a peer-based educational brochure and DVD either by mail or at the clinic. The outcome measures were liver candidates' knowledge and self-efficacy to discuss living donation with family and friends. The number and proportion of individuals who presented to centers for living liver donation evaluation were also measured. Liver transplant candidates' self-efficacy to discuss living donation and their knowledge increased from the pretest period to the posttest period. Those exposed to the peer-based intervention reported significantly greater knowledge, a greater likelihood of discussing donation, and increased self-efficacy in comparison with those not exposed to the intervention. The results did not differ by age, length of time on the waiting list, education, or ethnicity. In comparison with the preintervention period, living donation increased 42%, and the number of individuals who presented for donation evaluation increased by 74%.

The disposition of ceftriaxone was studied after a single 2 g intravenous dose in seven patients 3 to 5 days after liver transplantation. Ceftriaxone concentrations in plasma, urine, and bile were measured by HPLC, and plasma protein binding was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Plasma protein binding was nonlinear, and the unbound fraction varied between 0.05 and 0.56. Both capacity and affinity were markedly different from reported values for normal subjects. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained were: total body clearance (TBC), 11.2 +/- 7.8 mL/hr/kg total and 44.8 +/- 29.1 mL/hr/kg unbound; volume of distribution (V(area)), 224 +/- 76 mL/kg total and 767 +/- 432 mL/kg unbound; steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), 212 +/- 68 mL/kg total and 651 +/- 368 mL/kg unbound; terminal disposition half-life (t1/2), 21.6 +/- 14.3 hour total and 16.3 +/- 11.1 hour unbound. TBC for both total and free drug was considerably lower than literature values for normal subjects. V(area) for total drug was greater than normal, whereas the corresponding value for free drug was smaller than normal. The plasma ceftriaxone concentrations at 12 and 24 hours were above the reported minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The fraction of the administered dose excreted in urine over 24 hours was 38 +/- 29% and did not differ markedly from that reported for normal subjects. Less than 2% of the administered dose was excreted in 24-hour bile; however, biliary concentrations were always above MIC. Ceftriaxone can be administered once or twice daily at a dose of 2 g/day for prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients.

Fifty-nine patients with prior hepatitis B virus infection underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. During the first 2 mo, mortality was not significantly different in the hepatitis B virus–infected group (25.5%) vs. a hepatitis B virus–immune control group (21 %). Beyond 2 mo, the mortality, rate of graft loss, need for retransplantation and incidence of abnormal liver function were significantly higher in the hepatitis B virus–infected group. Treatment of the hepatitis B virus infection was attempted with passive immunization, combined active and passive immunization, α-interferon or nothing. The clinical outcome was not significantly influenced by any of these therapies. However, of the patients who lived more than 60 days, 6 of 22 treated with active plus passive immunization were cleared of HBsAg, something achieved once in 16 patients treated with α-interferon, never in 3 patients with passive immunization only and once in 4 patients with no therapy. In patients with recurrent hepatitis B virus infection, the pace of hepatitis development in the graft appeared to be accelerated, and this was particularly striking in patients who underwent multiple retransplantations at progressively shorter intervals. None of the patients who became HBsAg-negative had HBeAg preoperatively.

Although interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin are widely used in the treatment of hepatitis C, their role in the transplant recipient is unclear. We conducted a pilot study to determine the efficacy and safety of this therapy in transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Patients at least 6 months posttransplantation were treated with IFN-alpha 3 million units 3 times a week subcutaneously and ribavirin 800 mg daily by mouth for 48 weeks followed by ribavirin monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was sustained virologic response, and secondary end points included biochemical, virologic, and histologic responses at the end of combination treatment. Thirty-eight patients initiated therapy but 16 withdrew due to adverse effects, including 2 with myocardial infarction. Median age was 50 years; 74% were men, and 91% had genotype 1. The median interval between transplantation and enrollment was 23 months. On an intention-to-treat basis, 7 patients (18%) had a biochemical and 5 (13%) had a virologic response at the end of combination treatment. Inflammatory activity did not change, but fibrosis worsened in virologic nonresponders. Ribavirin maintenance caused a further decrease in serum alanine aminotransferase levels, but hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels increased. Only 2 of the 38 patients (5%) had a sustained virologic response. Several patients required treatment with erythropoietin for anemia. In conclusion, IFN-alpha and ribavirin are effective in a small proportion of liver allograft recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Adverse effects occur commonly, requiring dose reductions and treatment withdrawal.

We report the first case of primary cutaneous aspergillosis caused by Aspergillus ustus , a species that seldom infects human beings. The patient, a 62-year-old liver transplant recipient with end-stage hepatitis C-induced cirrhosis, was receiving the experimental immunosuppressive drug FK-506. Trauma to the skin of the right arm from tape and from an arm board holding intravenous and intraarterial catheters in place and to the left leg from an occlusive knee brace may have contributed to this unusual mycosis. The patient's cutaneous aspergillosis responded to a combination of intravenous amphotericin B and topical terbinafine cream. Although the patient died shortly thereafter from hepatic failure, there was no evidence of systemic aspergillosis. (J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:344-7.)

Nutritional support in patients with advanced cirrhosis is difficult due to protein, fluid and salt restrictions. Successful liver transplantation should improve nutrient tolerance. We randomly assigned 28 hypoalbuminemic cirrhotic patients to receive, immediately after liver transplantation, one of three regimens: group 1, no nutritional support (n = 10); group 2, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (35 kcal/kg/day) with standard amino acids (1.5 g/kg/day) (n = 8); or group 3, isocaloric isonitrogenous TPN with added branched-chain amino acids (n = 10). Therapy was continued for 7 days posttransplant. Jaundice resolution was unaffected by nutritional support. Nitrogen balance favored both TPN groups. Branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) aromatic amino acid ratios were highest in group 3. Coma scores and serum ammonia levels were similar in all groups. Both TPN groups achieved respirator independence earlier; this difference was not statistically significant. Group 1 patients stayed longest in ICU; the difference was statistically significant. TPN with either standard or BCAA- enriched amino acids is tolerated well immediately after successful liver transplant. Positive nitrogen balance is achieved; large protein loads do not worsen encephalopathy. Nutritional support may improve respiratory muscle function, allowing earlier weaning from ventilatory support. A shortened length of ICU stay justifies the expense of TPN.

Thirty-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurring in individuals with cirrhosis had a potentially curative surgical procedure. Twenty-two had segmental hepatic resections (HR), and 10 underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx). The diagnosis of hepatic malignancy was established in each case preoperatively, and each case was studied intraoperatively by means of sonography. Postoperatively each surgical specimen was examined pathologically with attention to the possibility of intrahepatic tumor spread. Twenty-three of the 32 patients had single small HCC lesion (

This report presents a retrospective case comparison study of 20 hyperprolactinemic patients with pituitary adenomas treated at the Mount Sinai Hospital (1976-1079). An association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and 20 subjects with pituitary tumors was substantiated using discordant paired analysis. The comparison group consisted of appendectomy patients admitted during the same time period and matched for sex and age. The estimated relative risk was 4.0 (P less than 0.025). This study suggests that there is a significant association between OC use and pituitary tumors associated with hyperprolactinemia.A retrospective case-comparison study of 20 hyperprolactinemic patients with pituitary adenomas is presented. Cases were from the period 1976-1979. Using discordant paired analysis, an association between oral contraceptive use and 20 subjects with pituitary tumors was substantiated. For comparison, a group of appendectomy patients admitted during the same time period and matched for sex and age was studied. An estimated relative risk of 4 (P .025) was found based on this comparison, and it is concluded that a significant association between use of oral contraceptives and pituitary tumors associated with hyperprolactinemia is suggested.

To the Editor. — The supply of livers for transplantation has been limited by an arbitrary 45- or 50-year upper age ceiling for donor candidacy, 1 a ceiling that Darby et al 2 suggest may be too restrictive. To see if donor age affects results, we analyzed the fate of 75 adult livers transplanted in December 1988 and January 1989. Study.— Conditions of brain death and acceptability of liver function tests were met by the usual standards of our procurement program. 3 Ten donors were 51 to 54 years old and the others had an average age of 26.9 years (Table). Donors beyond age 54 years were not arbitrarily excluded because of age. However, during the 2-month study, 15 other offers of livers from donors older than 50 years were refused; our person on call declined 10 of these for nonspecific "judgment" reasons that probably reflected the age factor. The

Ten patients with primary malignant tumors of the biliary tract, duodenum, or stomach and with secondary involvement of the liver underwent removal of most or all of the stomach, liver, pancreas, spleen, duodenum, proximal jejunum, terminal ileum, and ascending and transverse colon. The void in the upper abdomen was filled with an organ cluster graft consisting of the liver, pancreas, duodenum, and variable segments of proximal jejunum. Eight of the ten patients are alive after 3 to 9 months, all with good liver and pancreas function, and most with satisfactory function of the gastrointestinal tract. One of the surviving patients was in the hospital for 4 months because of multiple enteric fistulas and infections; the other seven survivors were discharged after an average of 43 +/- 17.61 (SD) days. Recurrent tumor has not been proved in any of the surviving recipients and is suspected in only one. The study of such cases should provide insight and guidelines applicable to other visceral transplantation procedures that may be attempted in the future.

One of the unresolved problems in liver transplantation is how to determine accurately the cause of the primary nonfunction that is seen in about 10% of hepatic grafts (1, 2). It is often assumed that ischemic injury has occurred when the new liver does not function. Acute immunologic injury comparable to the humorally mediated hyperacute rejection of kidneys probably occurs rarely, if at all (3), but an indolent version of hyperacute hepatic rejection that is not clearly associated with demonstrable preformed antibodies can cause hemorrhagic necrosis within 1 or 2 days (4). The other most common etiology of primary nonfunction probably is intraoperative injury of the transplant when a flawed operation is performed by the recipient team (1). Preexisting acute or chronic hepatic disease in the recipient will undoubtedly aggravate any of the foregoing factors, or may itself preclude success. Although hepatic injury may occur as part of the trauma that has led to brain death or may be an iatrogenic complication of the care that is provided, this may be difficult to prove even with biopsies of the homograft. Makowka et al. (5) have reported a surprising lack of correlation between so-called good- and bad-risk donor parameters and the clinical outcome of the recipient. We report here 2 examples of acute fatty infiltration of livers that had been procured from seemingly good donors who had been in good health until 1 and 2 ½ days previously. The grafts that were full of fat never functioned and were replaced immediately in 1 case and 3 days later in the other. This report suggests how to identify and avoid this lethal situation.