Search

Background and objectivesInvestigations of rapid neurologic improvement (RNI) in patients with acute cerebral ischemia (ACI) have focused on RNI occurring after hospital arrival. However, with stroke routing decisions and interventions increasingly migrating to the prehospital setting, there is a need to delineate the frequency, magnitude, predictors, and clinical outcomes of patients with ACI with ultra-early RNI (U-RNI) in the prehospital and early postarrival period.MethodsWe analyzed prospectively collected data of the prehospital Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium (FAST-MAG) randomized clinical trial. Any U-RNI was defined as improvement by 2 or more points on the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) score between the prehospital and early post-emergency department (ED) arrival examinations and classified as moderate (2-3 point) or dramatic (4-5 point) improvement. Outcome measures included excellent recovery (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1) and death by 90 days.ResultsAmong the 1,245 patients with ACI, the mean age was 70.9 years (SD 13.2); 45% were women; the median prehospital LAMS was 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-5); the median last known well to ED-LAMS time was 59 minutes (IQR 46-80 minutes), and the median prehospital LAMS to ED-LAMS time was 33 minutes (IQR 28-39 minutes). Overall, any U-RNI occurred in 31%, moderate U-RNI in 23%, and dramatic U-RNI in 8%. Any U-RNI was associated with improved outcomes, including excellent recovery (mRS score 0-1) at 90 days 65.1% (246/378) vs 35.4% (302/852), p < 0.0001; decreased mortality by 90 days 3.7% (14/378) vs 16.4% (140/852), p < 0.0001; decreased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage 1.6% (6/384) vs 4.6% (40/861), p = 0.0112; and increased likelihood of being discharged home 56.8% (218/384) vs 30.2% (260/861), p < 0.0001.DiscussionU-RNI occurs in nearly 1 in 3 ambulance-transported patients with ACI and is associated with excellent recovery and decreased mortality at 90 days. Accounting for U-RNI may be useful for routing decisions and future prehospital interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00059332.

ImportanceOne major advantage of developing large, federally funded networks for clinical research in neurology is the ability to have a trial-ready network that can efficiently conduct scientifically rigorous projects to improve the health of people with neurologic disorders.ObservationsNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Network for Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical Trials (NeuroNEXT) was established in 2011 and renewed in 2018 with the goal of being an efficient network to test between 5 and 7 promising new agents in phase II clinical trials. A clinical coordinating center, data coordinating center, and 25 sites were competitively chosen. Common infrastructure was developed to accelerate timelines for clinical trials, including central institutional review board (a first for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke), master clinical trial agreements, the use of common data elements, and experienced research sites and coordination centers. During the first 7 years, the network exceeded the goal of conducting 5 to 7 studies, with 9 funded. High interest was evident by receipt of 148 initial applications for potential studies in various neurologic disorders. Across the first 8 studies (the ninth study was funded at end of initial funding period), the central institutional review board approved the initial protocol in a mean (SD) of 59 (21) days, and additional sites were added a mean (SD) of 22 (18) days after submission. The median time from central institutional review board approval to first site activation was 47.5 days (mean, 102.1; range, 1-282) and from first site activation to first participant consent was 27 days (mean, 37.5; range, 0-96). The median time for database readiness was 3.5 months (mean, 4.0; range, 0-8) from funding receipt. In the 4 completed studies, enrollment met or exceeded expectations with 96% overall data accuracy across all sites. Nine peer-reviewed manuscripts were published, and 22 oral presentations or posters and 9 invited presentations were given at regional, national, and international meetings.Conclusions and relevanceNeuroNEXT initiated 8 studies, successfully enrolled participants at or ahead of schedule, collected high-quality data, published primary results in high-impact journals, and provided mentorship, expert statistical, and trial management support to several new investigators. Partnerships were successfully created between government, academia, industry, foundations, and patient advocacy groups. Clinical trial consortia can efficiently and successfully address a range of important neurologic research and therapeutic questions.

Introduction: Central nervous system involvement in scleroderma has traditionally been considered uncommon. Recent studies suggest that scleroderma might be associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease (CBVD), independent of conventional cardiovascular risk factors. We present a case series and a systematic review to capture the spectrum of CBVD in scleroderma, through a detailed description of clinical, demographic, laboratory, and radiographical findings. Methods: In our case series, we included consecutive patients with scleroderma and CBVD seen over 35 years by our group in different hospitals in the USA. We also performed a systematic review from inception to July 2022. MEDLINE/Embase/WoS were searched for "scleroderma", "systemic scleroderma", "systemic sclerosis", "cerebrovascular", "stroke", "cerebrovascular disorders", "cerebrovascular disease". Results: Fourteen patients with scleroderma and CBVD were included in our case series (mean age 48 years, 85% female). CBVDs were ischemic stroke (64%), hemorrhagic stroke (7%), venous thrombosis (7%), ischemic optic neuropathy (7%), probable ischemic stroke (14%). Of the 110 studies identified in our systematic review (45,484 patients), 82 reports with patient-level data were included for quantitative analysis (93 patients, mean age 48 years, 79% female). Despite 16 different CBVD types identified, ischemic stroke was the most common CBVD (29%), followed by vasculopathy (20%), hemorrhage (12%), vasculitis (11%), and intracranial aneurysm (11%). Conclusion: Our relatively large case series combined with a systematic review of CBVD in SCL patients shows a heterogeneous spectrum of CBVD etiology, with acute ischemic stroke being the most common in our cases and in our literature review. A complex interaction between chronic inflammation, autoimmune mechanisms, and endothelial dysfunction seems to underlie the CBVD heterogeneity in scleroderma patients. This review informs clinicians about the spectrum of CBVD related to scleroderma and raise awareness about scleroderma being a possible risk factor for early-onset CBVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purposeSeveral definitions have been proposed to distinguish clinically relevant from incidental cerebral hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. We investigated which definition best identifies cerebral hemorrhages that alter long-term functional outcome in the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) trials.MethodsWe analyzed 4 candidate hemorrhage definitions for which the NINDS tPA trials public data set had relevant data. For each, we identified tPA-treated patients having that hemorrhage type and compared their actual functional outcomes at 90 days with their predicted outcomes had they not received tPA and not had the hemorrhage. Projected outcomes without tPA were based on a 17-variable prognostic model derived from the NINDS tPA trials placebo group.ResultsAmong the 312 patients treated with intravenous tPA, 33 (10.6%) experienced any radiological intracerebral hemorrhage

Approximately 15% of all ischemic strokes (IS) occur in young adults and adolescents. To date, only limited prior public health and research efforts have specifically addressed stroke in the young. Early diagnosis remains challenging because of the lack of awareness and the relative infrequency of stroke compared with stroke mimics. Moreover, the causes of IS in the young are heterogeneous and can be relatively uncommon, resulting in uncertainties about diagnostic evaluation and cause-specific management. Emerging data have raised public health concerns about the increasing prevalence of traditional vascular risk factors in young individuals, and their potential role in increasing the risk of IS, stroke recurrence, and poststroke mortality. These issues make it important to formulate and enact strategies to increase both awareness and access to resources for young stroke patients, their caregivers and families, and health care professionals. The American Academy of Neurology recently convened an expert panel to develop a consensus document concerning the recognition, evaluation, and management of IS in young adults and adolescents. The report of the consensus panel is presented herein.

Medical data and information are ubiquitous due to internet availability. However, most people persist in using and trusting their healthcare professionals for health information. They are increasingly flooded with health information from diverse sources such as the internet, community-based organizations, and family or friends. It is crucial to understand where stroke patients vary in the use and trust of health information to improve their conditions. This pilot study aimed to better understand the nature of the problems confronted by stroke patients, such as the source of reliable health information, trust in the healthcare system, and technology trend awareness. African American and Afro-Caribbean stroke patients (n=64) residing in Central Brooklyn, New York, participated in a survey. The results showed that physicians remained the most highly trusted information sources for stroke patients, particularly among patients with higher education, irrespective of the available communication sources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]