Search

We study online contention resolution schemes (OCRSs) and prophet inequalities for non-product distributions. Specifically, when the active set is sampled according to a pairwise-independent (PI) distribution, we show a $(1-o_k(1))$-selectable OCRS for uniform matroids of rank $k$, and $\Omega(1)$-selectable OCRSs for laminar, graphic, cographic, transversal, and regular matroids. These imply prophet inequalities with the same ratios when the set of values is drawn according to a PI distribution. Our results complement recent work of Dughmi, Kalayci, and Patel (STOC '24) showing that no $\omega(1/k)$-selectable OCRS exists in the PI setting for general matroids of rank $k$., Comment: Contains new results on t-wise independent CRSs

In the stochastic set cover problem (Grandoni et al., FOCS '08), we are given a collection $\mathcal{S}$ of $m$ sets over a universe $\mathcal{U}$ of size $N$, and a distribution $D$ over elements of $\mathcal{U}$. The algorithm draws $n$ elements one-by-one from $D$ and must buy a set to cover each element on arrival; the goal is to minimize the total cost of sets bought during this process. A universal algorithm a priori maps each element $u \in \mathcal{U}$ to a set $S(u)$ such that if $U \subseteq \mathcal{U}$ is formed by drawing $n$ times from distribution $D$, then the algorithm commits to outputting $S(U)$. Grandoni et al. gave an $O(\log mN)$-competitive universal algorithm for this stochastic set cover problem. We improve unilaterally upon this result by giving a simple, polynomial time $O(\log mn)$-competitive universal algorithm for the more general prophet version, in which $U$ is formed by drawing from $n$ different distributions $D_1, \ldots, D_n$. Furthermore, we show that we do not need full foreknowledge of the distributions: in fact, a single sample from each distribution suffices. We show similar results for the 2-stage prophet setting and for the online-with-a-sample setting. We obtain our results via a generic reduction from the single-sample prophet setting to the random-order setting; this reduction holds for a broad class of minimization problems that includes all covering problems. We take advantage of this framework by giving random-order algorithms for non-metric facility location and set multicover; using our framework, these automatically translate to universal prophet algorithms.

We study the problem of chasing positive bodies in $\ell_1$: given a sequence of bodies $K_{t}=\{x^{t}\in\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n}\mid C^{t}x^{t}\geq 1,P^{t}x^{t}\leq 1\}$ revealed online, where $C^{t}$ and $P^{t}$ are nonnegative matrices, the goal is to (approximately) maintain a point $x_t \in K_t$ such that $\sum_t \|x_t - x_{t-1}\|_1$ is minimized. This captures the fully-dynamic low-recourse variant of any problem that can be expressed as a mixed packing-covering linear program and thus also the fractional version of many central problems in dynamic algorithms such as set cover, load balancing, hyperedge orientation, minimum spanning tree, and matching. We give an $O(\log d)$-competitive algorithm for this problem, where $d$ is the maximum row sparsity of any matrix $C^t$. This bypasses and improves exponentially over the lower bound of $\sqrt{n}$ known for general convex bodies. Our algorithm is based on iterated information projections, and, in contrast to general convex body chasing algorithms, is entirely memoryless. We also show how to round our solution dynamically to obtain the first fully dynamic algorithms with competitive recourse for all the stated problems above; i.e. their recourse is less than the recourse of every other algorithm on every update sequence, up to polylogarithmic factors. This is a significantly stronger notion than the notion of absolute recourse in the dynamic algorithms literature.

We study the block-aware caching problem, a generalization of classic caching in which fetching (or evicting) pages from the same block incurs the same cost as fetching (or evicting) just one page from the block. Given a cache of size $k$, and a sequence of requests from $n$ pages partitioned into given blocks of size $\beta\leq k$, the goal is to minimize the total cost of fetching to (or evicting from) cache. We show the following results: $\bullet$ For the eviction cost model, we show an $O(\log k)$-approximate offline algorithm, a $k$-competitive deterministic online algorithm, and an $O(\log^2 k)$-competitive randomized online algorithm. $\bullet$ For the fetching cost model, we show an integrality gap of $\Omega(\beta)$ for the natural LP relaxation of the problem, and an $\Omega(\beta + \log k)$ lower bound for randomized online algorithms. The strategy of ignoring the block-structure and running a classical paging algorithm trivially achieves an $O(\beta)$ approximation and an $O(\beta \log k)$ competitive ratio respectively for the offline and online-randomized setting. $\bullet$ For both fetching and eviction models, we show improved bounds for the $(h,k)$-bicriteria version of the problem. In particular, when $k=2h$, we match the performance of classical caching algorithms up to constant factors. Our results establish a separation between the tractability of the fetching and eviction cost models, which is interesting since fetching/evictions costs are the same up to an additive term for classic caching. Previous work only studied online deterministic algorithms for the fetching cost model when $k > h$. Our insight is to relax the block-aware caching problem to a submodular covering LP. The main technical challenge is to maintain a competitive fractional solution, and to round it with bounded loss, as the constraints of this LP are revealed online.

We give a polynomial-time algorithm for OnlineSetCover with a competitive ratio of $O(\log mn)$ when the elements are revealed in random order, essentially matching the best possible offline bound of $O(\log n)$ and circumventing the $\Omega(\log m \log n)$ lower bound known in adversarial order. We also extend the result to solving pure covering IPs when constraints arrive in random order. The algorithm is a multiplicative-weights-based round-and-solve approach we call LearnOrCover. We maintain a coarse fractional solution that is neither feasible nor monotone increasing, but can nevertheless be rounded online to achieve the claimed guarantee (in the random order model). This gives a new offline algorithm for SetCover that performs a single pass through the elements, which may be of independent interest., Comment: minor correction to potential argument

In submodular covering problems, we are given a monotone, nonnegative submodular function $f: 2^N \rightarrow\mathbb{R}_+$ and wish to find the min-cost set $S\subseteq N$ such that $f(S)=f(N)$. This captures SetCover when $f$ is a coverage function. We introduce a general framework for solving such problems in a fully-dynamic setting where the function $f$ changes over time, and only a bounded number of updates to the solution (recourse) is allowed. For concreteness, suppose a nonnegative monotone submodular function $g_t$ is added or removed from an active set $G^{(t)}$ at each time $t$. If $f^{(t)}=\sum_{g\in G^{(t)}} g$ is the sum of all active functions, we wish to maintain a competitive solution to SubmodularCover for $f^{(t)}$ as this active set changes, and with low recourse. We give an algorithm that maintains an $O(\log(f_{max}/f_{min}))$-competitive solution, where $f_{max}, f_{min}$ are the largest/smallest marginals of $f^{(t)}$. The algorithm guarantees a total recourse of $O(\log(c_{max}/ c_{min})\cdot\sum_{t\leq T}g_t(N))$, where $c_{max},c_{min}$ are the largest/smallest costs of elements in $N$. This competitive ratio is best possible even in the offline setting, and the recourse bound is optimal up to the logarithmic factor. For monotone submodular functions that also have positive mixed third derivatives, we show an optimal recourse bound of $O(\sum_{t\leq T}g_t(N))$. This structured class includes set-coverage functions, so our algorithm matches the known $O(\log n)$-competitiveness and $O(1)$ recourse guarantees for fully-dynamic SetCover. Our work simultaneously simplifies and unifies previous results, as well as generalizes to a significantly larger class of covering problems. Our key technique is a new potential function inspired by Tsallis entropy. We also extensively use the idea of Mutual Coverage, which generalizes the classic notion of mutual information.

We study streaming submodular maximization subject to matching/$b$-matching constraints (MSM/MSbM), and present improved upper and lower bounds for these problems. On the upper bounds front, we give primal-dual algorithms achieving the following approximation ratios. $\bullet$ $3+2\sqrt{2}\approx 5.828$ for monotone MSM, improving the previous best ratio of $7.75$. $\bullet$ $4+3\sqrt{2}\approx 7.464$ for non-monotone MSM, improving the previous best ratio of $9.899$. $\bullet$ $3+\epsilon$ for maximum weight b-matching, improving the previous best ratio of $4+\epsilon$. On the lower bounds front, we improve on the previous best lower bound of $\frac{e}{e-1}\approx 1.582$ for MSM, and show ETH-based lower bounds of $\approx 1.914$ for polytime monotone MSM streaming algorithms. Our most substantial contributions are our algorithmic techniques. We show that the (randomized) primal-dual method, which originated in the study of maximum weight matching (MWM), is also useful in the context of MSM. To our knowledge, this is the first use of primal-dual based analysis for streaming submodular optimization. We also show how to reinterpret previous algorithms for MSM in our framework; hence, we hope our work is a step towards unifying old and new techniques for streaming submodular maximization, and that it paves the way for further new results.

Say that we are given samples from a distribution $\psi$ over an $n$-dimensional space. We expect or desire $\psi$ to behave like a product distribution (or a $k$-wise independent distribution over its marginals for small $k$). We propose the problem of enumerating/list-decoding all large subcubes where the distribution $\psi$ deviates markedly from what we expect; we refer to such subcubes as skewed subcubes. Skewed subcubes are certificates of dependencies between small subsets of variables in $\psi$. We motivate this problem by showing that it arises naturally in the context of algorithmic fairness and anomaly detection. In this work we focus on the special but important case where the space is the Boolean hypercube, and the expected marginals are uniform. We show that the obvious definition of skewed subcubes can lead to intractable list sizes, and propose a better definition of a minimal skewed subcube, which are subcubes whose skew cannot be attributed to a larger subcube that contains it. Our main technical contribution is a list-size bound for this definition and an algorithm to efficiently find all such subcubes. Both the bound and the algorithm rely on Fourier-analytic techniques, especially the powerful hypercontractive inequality. On the lower bounds side, we show that finding skewed subcubes is as hard as the sparse noisy parity problem, and hence our algorithms cannot be improved on substantially without a breakthrough on this problem which is believed to be intractable. Motivated by this, we study alternate models allowing query access to $\psi$ where finding skewed subcubes might be easier.

We present a PTAS for computing the maximum a posteriori assignment on Pairwise Markov Random Fields with non-negative weights in planar graphs. This algorithm is practical and not far behind state-of-the-art techniques in image processing. MAP on Pairwise Markov Random Fields with (possibly) negative weights cannot be approximated unless P = NP, even on planar graphs. We also show via reduction that this yields a PTAS for one scoring function of Correlation Clustering in planar graphs.