Search

Franz Goss,1 Johannes Brachmann,2 Christian W Hamm,3 Winfried Haerer,4 Nicolaus Reifart,5 Benny Levenson6 1Herzzentrum Alter Hof, München, Germany; 2Klinikum Coburg GmbH, II. Medizinische Klinik, Coburg, Germany; 3Kerckhoff Klinik GmbH, Kardiologie, Bad Nauheim, Germany; 4Herzklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany; 5Kardiologische Praxis Prof. Reifart & Partner, Bad Soden, Germany; 6Kardiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis und Herzkatheterlabor Berlin-Charlottenburg, Berlin, Germany Abstract: We aimed to assess patient acceptance and effectiveness of a 12-month structured management program in patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event who were treated in a special setting of office-based cardiologists. The program comprised patient documentation with a specific tool (Bundesverband Niedergelassener Kardiologen [German Federation of Office-Based Cardiologists] cardiac pass with visit scheduling) shared by the hospital physician and the office-based cardiologist, the definition of individual treatment targets, and the systematic information of patients in order to optimize adherence to therapy. Participating centers (36 hospitals, 60 office-based cardiologists) included a total of 1,003 patients with ACS (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] 44.3%, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI] 39.5%, unstable angina pectoris [UA] 15.2%, and unspecified 1.0%). During follow-up, treatment rates with cardiac medication remained high in all groups, with dual antiplatelet therapy in 91.0% at 3 months, 90.0% at 6 months, and 82.8% at 12 months, respectively. Twelve months after the inclusion, a total of 798 patients (79.6%) still participated in the program. Eighteen patients (1.8%) had died after discharge from hospital (6 in the STEMI, 12 in the NSTEMI group), while for 58 the status was unknown (5.8%). Based on a conservative approach that considered patients with unknown status as dead, 1-year mortality was 7.6%. Recurrent cardiac events were noted in14.9% at 1 year, with an about equal distribution across STEMI and NSTEMI patients. In conclusion, patients’ acceptance of the ProAcor program as determined by adherence rates over time was high. Treatment rates of recommended medications used for patients with coronary heart disease were excellent. The 1-year mortality rate was comparatively low. Keywords: myocardial infarction, patient management, patient education, feedback, ­patient-oriented outcomes, therapy adherence, compliance, mortality, quality of life

Background: This nationwide routine data analysis evaluates if oral anticoagulant (OAC) use in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) leads to a lower mortality and reduced readmission rate. Superiority of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA), was analyzed for these endpoints., Methods: Anonymous data of patients with a health insurance at the Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse and a claims record for hospitalization with the main diagnosis of HF and secondary diagnosis of AF (2017-2019) were included. A hospital stay in the previous year was an exclusion criterion. Mortality and readmission for all-cause and stroke/intracranial bleeding (ICB) were analyzed 91-365 days after the index hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the impact of medication on outcome., Results: 180,316 cases were included [81 years (IQR 76-86), 55.6% female, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥ 2 (96.81%)]. In 80.6%, OACs were prescribed (VKA: 21.7%; direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI): 60.0%; direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI): 3.4%; with multiple prescriptions per patient included). Mortality rate was 19.1%, readmission rate was 29.9% and stroke/ICB occurred in 1.9%. Risk of death was lower with any OAC (HR 0.77, 95% CI [0.75-0.79]) but without significant differences in OAC type (VKA: HR 0.73, [0.71-0.76]; FXaI: HR 0.77, [0.75-0.78]; DTI: HR 0.71, [0.66-0.77]). The total readmission rate (HR 0.97, [0.94 to 0.99]) and readmission for stroke/ICB (HR 0.71, [0.65-0.77]) was lower with OAC., Conclusions: Nationwide data confirm a reduction in mortality and readmission rate in HF-AF patients taking OACs, without NOAC superiority., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest M.M. received speakers and consulting fees from Bayer Healthcare, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, BRAHMS GmbH and Roche Diagnostics as well as research funding from German public funding authorities for Health Care Research and Roche Diagnostics; G.M. received speaker fees from Getinge, Orion Pharma and AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals Germany GmbH; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In 2015 and 2018, European Society of Cardiology guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) favoring radial access over femoral access were published. These recommendations were based on randomized trials suggesting that patients treated radially experienced reduced bleeding complications and all-cause mortality. We aimed to assess acceptance and results of radial access in a real-world scenario by analyzing all PCI cases in the Quality Assurance in Invasive Cardiology (QuIK) registry., Methods: The QuIK registry prospectively collects data on all diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures from 148 private practice cardiology centers in Germany. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) were defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or death during hospitalization., Results: From 2012 to 2018, 189,917 patients underwent PCI via either access method. The rate of radial approach steadily increased from 13 to 49%. The groups did not differ significantly with respect to age or extent of coronary disease. Femoral approach was significantly more common in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Overall, there were significant differences in MACE (radial 0.12%; femoral 0.24%; p < 0.0009) and access site complications (radial 0.2%; femoral 0.8% (p < 0.0009)., Conclusion: Our data reveals an increase in use of radial access in recent years in Germany. The radial approach emerged as favorable regarding MACE in non-myocardial infarction patients, as well as favorable regarding access site complication regardless of indication for percutaneous intervention., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To describe the use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in the largest population of statutory health insurance members in Germany, including newly developed bio-resorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs), and to evaluate 1-year complication rates of DES as compared with bare metal stents (BMSs) in this cohort., Design: Routine data analysis of statutory health insurance claims data from the years 2008 to 2014., Setting: The German healthcare insurance Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse covers approximately 30% of the German population and is the largest nationwide provider of statutory healthcare insurance in Germany., Participants and Interventions: We included all patients with a claims record for a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either DES or BMS and additionally, from 2013, BVS. Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were excluded., Main Outcome Measure: major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular event (MACCE, defined as mortality, AMI, stroke and transient ischaemic attack), bypass surgery, PCI and coronary angiography) at 1 year after the intervention., Results: A total of 243 581 PCI cases were included (DES excluding BVS: 143 765; BVS: 1440; BMS: 98 376). The 1-year MACCE rate was 7.42% in the DES subgroup excluding BVS and 11.29% in the BMS subgroup. The adjusted OR for MACCE was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.75) in patients with DES excluding BVS as compared with patients with BMS. In the BVS group, the proportion of 1-year MACCE was 5.0%., Conclusion: The analyses demonstrate a lower MACCE rate for PCI with DES. BVSs are used in clinical routine in selected cases and seem to provide a high degree of safety, but data are still sparse., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Background: Second-generation TAVI prostheses may enhance the procedure reducing operative time and complications rate, maintaining adequate valve hemodynamic performance. We present our results with 2 new generation trans-catheter aortic valve (TAVI) prostheses in obese patients., Methods: A series of 172 patients underwent trans-femoral TAVI with new generation prostheses (Direct Flow Medical, DFM®, and LOTUS®). Two groups were identified according to body mass index (BMI): group NO (125) BMI<30kg/m(2) and group O (47) BMI≥30kg/m(2)., Results: Trans-femoral approach was possible in all patients without conversion to conventional surgery/cardiopulmonary bypass. Operative/fluoroscopy time and contrast use were comparable. Vascular and bleeding complications were also equally represented in the 2 groups. Thirty-day mortality was 7.2% in group NO and 6.4% in group O (p=0.9). At discharge, aortic regurgitation was absent/mild in 96% of group NO and in all patients in group O (p=0.3). Mild prosthetic stenosis was reported in 3.8% of the patients in group NO and 2.2% in group O. No moderate/severe prosthetic stenosis was reported. Estimated 1-year survival was 93.1% in group NO and 83.2% in group O (p=0.6). Estimated 1-year freedom from MACCE was 74.7% in group NO and 62.8% in group O (p=0.4). At follow-up echocardiography no significant differences were noticed in the 2 groups., Conclusions: Second generation TAVI prostheses allow for safe and effective procedures in obese patients. In spite of patient's body habitus, agile prosthesis placement will lead to optimized hemodynamics. Valve and clinical performance are confirmed at follow-up., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)