Search

PURPOSE The adjunctive use of intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) is gaining acceptance as a potential means to improve outcomes for surgical resection of targetable tumors. This confirmatory study examined the use of pafolacianine for real-time detection of folate receptor–positive ovarian cancer. METHODS This phase III, open-label, 11-center study included subjects with known or suspected ovarian cancer, scheduled to undergo cytoreductive surgery. The objectives were to confirm safety and efficacy of pafolacianine (0.025 mg/kg IV), given ≥ 1 hour before intraoperative near-infrared imaging to detect macroscopic lesions not detected by palpation and normal white light. RESULTS From March 2018 through April 2020, 150 patients received a single infusion of pafolacianine (safety analysis set); 109 patients with folate receptor–positive ovarian cancer comprised the full analysis set for efficacy. In 33.0% of patients (95% CI, 24.3 to 42.7; P < .001), pafolacianine with near-infrared imaging identified additional cancer on tissue not planned for resection and not detected by white light assessment and palpation, exceeding the prespecified threshold of 10%. Among patients who underwent interval debulking surgery, the rate was 39.7% (95% CI, 27.0 to 53.4; P < .001). The sensitivity to detect ovarian cancer was 83%, and the patient false-positive rate was 24.8%. Investigators reported achieving complete R0 resection in 62.4% (68 of 109) of patients. Drug-related adverse events were reported by 30% of patients (45 of 150) and most commonly included nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. No drug-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. CONCLUSION This phase III study of pafolacianine met its primary efficacy end point, identifying additional cancers not otherwise identified or planned for resection. Pafolacianine may offer an important real-time adjunct to current surgical approaches for ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer, predictors of bevacizumab efficacy in first-line setting are needed. In the ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled cancer antigen-125 [CA-125] ELIMination rate constant K [KELIM] score) was a predictive biomarker. Only the patients with high-risk disease (suboptimally resected stage III, or stage IV) exhibiting unfavorable KELIM score < 1.0 had overall survival (OS) benefit from bevacizumab (median: 29.7 v 20.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78). An external validation study in the GOG-0218 trial was performed. METHODS In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel ± concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab/placebo. Patient KELIM values were calculated with CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days by the Lyon University team. The association between KELIM score (favorable ≥ 1.0, or unfavorable < 1.0) and bevacizumab benefit for progression-free survival (PFS)/OS was independently assessed by NGR-GOG using univariate/multivariate analyses. RESULTS KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. An unfavorable KELIM score was associated with bevacizumab benefit compared with placebo (PFS: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82; OS: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.03), whereas a favorable KELIM was not (PFS: HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.17; OS: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.39). The highest benefit was observed in patients with a high-risk disease exhibiting unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (median: 9.1 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.78), and for OS (median: 35.1 v 29.1 months; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97). CONCLUSION This GOG-0218 trial investigation validates ICON-7 findings about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab may mainly be effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive disease. Bevacizumab may be prioritized in patients with a high-risk and poorly chemosensitive disease to improve their PFS/OS (patient KELIM score calculator available on the Biomarker Kinetics website).

Supplementary Figure 2

To isolate circulating tumor cells (CTC) from women with advanced cervical cancer and estimate the impact of CTCs and treatment on overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 7.5 mL of whole blood was drawn pre-cycle 1 and 36 days post-cycle 1 from patients enrolled on Gynecologic Oncology Group 0240, the phase III randomized trial that led directly to regulatory approval of the antiangiogenesis drug, bevacizumab, in women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. CTCs (defined as anti-cytokeratin+/anti-CD45− cells) were isolated from the buffy coat layer using an anti-EpCAM antibody-conjugated ferrofluid and rare earth magnet, and counted using a semiautomated fluorescence microscope. The median pre-cycle 1 CTC count was 7 CTCs/7.5 mL whole blood (range, 0–18) and, at 36 days posttreatment, was 4 (range, 0–17). The greater the declination in CTCs between time points studied, the lower the risk of death [HR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79–0.95)]. Among patients with high (≥ median) pretreatment CTCs, bevacizumab treatment was associated with a reduction in the hazard of death (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32–1.03) and PFS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36–0.96). This effect was not observed with low (< median) CTCs. CTCs can be isolated from women with advanced cervical cancer and may have prognostic significance. A survival benefit conferred by bevacizumab among patients with high pretreatment CTCs may reflect increased tumor neovascularization and concomitant vulnerability to VEGF inhibition. These data support studying CTC capture as a potential predictive biomarker.

Cervical cancer; Checkpoint inhibitor; Immunotherapy Cáncer de cuello uterino; Inhibidor de puntos de control; Inmunoterapia Càncer cervical; Inhibidor de punts de control; Immunoteràpia Objective This phase II clinical trial evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of balstilimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Methods Eligible patients were 18 years or older with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer and who had relapsed after a prior platinum-based treatment regimen for advanced disease. Balstilimab was administered intravenously at 3 mg/kg once every two weeks, for up to 24 months. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1) as assessed by an independent review committee. Results At data cutoff, 161 women (median age, 53 years [range 25–81]) were enrolled and treated with balstilimab. Of these, 140 had measurable disease at baseline and one prior line of platinum-based therapy in the metastatic, persistent, or recurrent setting; these patients were included in the efficacy analyses. The ORR was 15% (95% CI, 10.0%–21.8%) and included 5 patients with a complete response and 16 with a partial response. The median duration of response was 15.4 months. In patients with PD-L1-positive tumors the ORR was 20%, however patients with PD-L1-negative tumors also responded to balstilimab (ORR, 7.9%). Responses were not restricted to tumors of squamous cell histology, and an ORR of 12.5% was seen in the subset of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma. The disease control rate was 49.3% (95% CI, 41.1%–57.5%). Immune-mediated enterocolitis (3.1%) and diarrhea (1.9%) were the most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion Balstilimab demonstrated meaningful and durable clinical activity, with manageable safety, in patients with previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. This study was funded by Agenus Inc.

Background: Although most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer respond to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy, around 70% will relapse within 3 years. The phase 3 JAVELIN Ovarian 100 trial compared avelumab (anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) in combination with chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance, or chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance, versus chemotherapy alone in patients with treatment-naive epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: JAVELIN Ovarian 100 was a global, open-label, three-arm, parallel, randomised, phase 3 trial run at 159 hospitals and cancer treatment centres in 25 countries. Eligible women were aged 18 years and older with stage III–IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer (following debulking surgery, or candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via interactive response technology to receive chemotherapy (six cycles; carboplatin dosed at an area under the serum-concentration-time curve of 5 or 6 intravenously every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 80 mg/m2 once a week [investigators' choice]) followed by avelumab maintenance (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks; avelumab maintenance group); chemotherapy plus avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) followed by avelumab maintenance (avelumab combination group); or chemotherapy followed by observation (control group). Randomisation was in permuted blocks of size six and stratified by paclitaxel regimen and resection status. Patients and investigators were masked to assignment to the two chemotherapy groups without avelumab at the time of randomisation until completion of the chemotherapy phase. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in all randomly assigned patients (analysed by intention to treat). Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02718417. The trial was fully enrolled and terminated at interim analysis due to futility, and efficacy is no longer being assessed. Findings: Between May 19, 2016 and Jan 23, 2018, 998 patients were randomly assigned (avelumab maintenance n=332, avelumab combination n=331, and control n=335). At the planned interim analysis (data cutoff Sept 7, 2018), prespecified futility boundaries were crossed for the progression-free survival analysis, and the trial was stopped as recommended by the independent data monitoring committee and endorsed by the protocol steering committee. Median follow-up for progression-free survival for all patients was 10·8 months (IQR 7·1–14·9); 11·1 months (7·0–15·3) for the avelumab maintenance group, 11·0 months (7·4–14·5) for the avelumab combination group, and 10·2 months (6·7–14·0) for the control group. Median progression-free survival was 16·8 months (95% CI 13·5–not estimable [NE]) with avelumab maintenance, 18·1 months (14·8–NE) with avelumab combination treatment, and NE (18·2 months–NE) with control treatment. The stratified hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 1·43 (95% CI 1·05–1·95; one-sided p=0·99) with the avelumab maintenance regimen and 1·14 (0·83–1·56; one-sided p=0·79) with the avelumab combination regimen, versus control treatment. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were anaemia (69 [21%] patients in the avelumab maintenance group, 63 [19%] in the avelumab combination group, and 53 [16%] in the control group), neutropenia (91 [28%], 99 [30%], and 88 [26%]), and neutrophil count decrease (49 [15%], 45 [14%], and 59 [18%]). Serious adverse events of any grade occurred in 92 (28%) patients in the avelumab maintenance group, 118 (36%) in the avelumab combination group, and 64 (19%) in the control group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one (

The GOG Foundation, Inc. (GOG-F) is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization with the purpose of promoting excellence in the quality and integrity of clinical and basic scientific research in the field of gynecologic malignancies. GOG Partners (GOG-P) is a program of the GOG-F and is positioned alongside NRG Oncology under the GOG-F organizational umbrella. GOG-P operates outside of the federally funded NCI NRG Oncology, a key distinguishing feature. By functioning as a site management organization (SMO), GOG-P provides an additional platform for clinical trial development, mentorship opportunities, patient accrual, and site infrastructure support yielding an expanded gynecologic oncology clinical trials infrastructure in the US. GOG-P has a consistent track record of conducting high quality clinical trials that lead to bringing novel FDA approved treatments for gynecologic cancer. This manuscript summarizes the history and organizational structure of the GOG-P. In addition, we outline the other key supportive programs within the GOG-F that help support the GOG-P effort to perform transformative gynecologic cancer research.

To isolate circulating tumor cells (CTC) from women with advanced cervical cancer and estimate the impact of CTCs and treatment on overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 7.5 mL of whole blood was drawn pre-cycle 1 and 36 days post-cycle 1 from patients enrolled on Gynecologic Oncology Group 0240, the phase III randomized trial that led directly to regulatory approval of the antiangiogenesis drug, bevacizumab, in women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. CTCs (defined as anti-cytokeratin+/anti-CD45− cells) were isolated from the buffy coat layer using an anti-EpCAM antibody-conjugated ferrofluid and rare earth magnet, and counted using a semiautomated fluorescence microscope. The median pre-cycle 1 CTC count was 7 CTCs/7.5 mL whole blood (range, 0–18) and, at 36 days posttreatment, was 4 (range, 0–17). The greater the declination in CTCs between time points studied, the lower the risk of death [HR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79–0.95)]. Among patients with high (≥ median) pretreatment CTCs, bevacizumab treatment was associated with a reduction in the hazard of death (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32–1.03) and PFS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36–0.96). This effect was not observed with low (< median) CTCs. CTCs can be isolated from women with advanced cervical cancer and may have prognostic significance. A survival benefit conferred by bevacizumab among patients with high pretreatment CTCs may reflect increased tumor neovascularization and concomitant vulnerability to VEGF inhibition. These data support studying CTC capture as a potential predictive biomarker.

Objective To explore the relationship between tumor size and response to combined anti-vascular targeted therapy using the anti-angiogenesis inhibitor, bevacizumab, and the tubulin-binding vascular disrupting agent, fosbretabulin. Methods An exploratory, post-hoc analysis of the randomized phase II trial, Gynecologic Oncology Group-0186I, was performed. One hundred and seven patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma, treated with up to 3 prior regimens, were randomized to bevacizumab 15 mg/kg body weight with or without intravenous fosbretabulin 60 mg/m2 body surface area every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary analysis favored the combination (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47–1.00; p = .049) [Monk BJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2279–86]. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the treatment effect in various subpopulations. Results With extended follow-up, the median PFS for bevacizumab plus fosbretabulin was 7.6 months as compared to 4.8 months with bevacizumab alone (HR 0.74; 90% CI, 0.54–1.02). Overall survival was similar in the experimental and control arms (25.2 vs 24.4 mos, respectively, HR 0.85; 90% CI, 0.59–1.22; p = .461). Eighty-one patients had measurable disease and median tumor size was 5.7 cm. In the ≤5.7 cm subgroup, the HR for progression or death was 0.77 (90% CI 0.45–1.31). Patients with tumors >5.7 cm (n = 40) had a HR for progression or death of 0.55; 90% CI, 0.32–0.96; p = .075). Conclusions Although no significant survival benefit was observed, the trend showing a reduced HR for progression or death with increasing tumor size when fosbretabulin is added to bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab alone warrants further study.

BackgroundInvasive cervical carcinoma is associated with a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence of >0.1%, and screening is recommended and cost-effective for cancer populations exceeding this threshold. HIV status is also prognostic for cancer-specific survival, but compliance with HIV screening is poor in the USA and abroad.ObjectivesThis study aims to describe HIV screening practices in a US comprehensive cancer center. To guide quality improvement, we identify characteristics which may predict compliance with screening.Study designWomen treated for invasive cervical cancer from January 2007 to December 2017 were identified by local cancer registry and billing data. We assessed age, race, ethnicity, insurance status, histology, stage, pregnancy, drug use, and HIV testing status. Univariate logistical regression was performed to assess predictors of completed HIV screening.ResultsOf 492 eligible women, the cumulative screening rate was 7.6%. Race, ethnicity, histology, and funding source were not predictive of screening. Every 5 year increase in age was associated with a lower chance of screening (OR 0.86, p=0.015), as was earlier stage at diagnosis (OR 0.43, p=0.017). Pregnancy during, or antecedent to, invasive cervical cancer diagnosis was significantly more predictive of screening compliance (OR 10.57, p=0.0007). Only 8/492 (1.6%) women in the cohort were active or former drug users, but within this group HIV screening was performed more frequently (OR 22.7, pConclusionDespite US and international recommendations for HIV screening in AIDS-defining cancers, compliance remains low. In our centers, factors including earlier age, advanced stage, active pregnancy at diagnosis, and any drug use history were predictive of greater compliance with screening. These data will inform a tailored intervention to improve compliance with HIV screening in our population.

Introduction: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including rucaparib, are the only targeted class of therapeutics approved for recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma with a predictive biomarker. Currently, three different PARP inhibitors are approved for either the treatment of ovarian cancer or maintenance of remission following chemotherapy. The Foundation Focus CDxBRCA is an FDA-cleared next-generation sequencing tumor tissue assay that detects somatic and sometimes germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.Areas covered: The authors discuss the evolution of the ovarian cancer genomic testing landscape relative to PARP inhibition, with a focus on Foundation Focus CDxBRCA and CDxBRCA Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH), the complementary diagnostics (CDx) to rucaparib.Expert opinion: Relatively early in PARP inhibitor development, women with somatic and/or germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were found to have higher response rates to PARP inhibitors with longer durability than women who were BRCA wildtype. Other measures of homologous recombination deficiency including LOH have proven to be predictive biomarkers also. Because PARP biomarkers are genomic and complex, co-development of high-performance companion diagnostics was a high priority. The Foundation Focus test began as a next-generation sequencing assay capable of detecting germline (gBRCA) and somatic (sBRCA) mutations that predict response to rucaparib treatment. The addition of LOH to the assay was validated by a clinical trial supporting expansion of the Rucaparib FDA label to include maintenance of chemotherapy response.

Objective Clear cell carcinomas (CCCs) of the ovary and uterus are rare and associated with poor prognosis. Information regarding expression of PD-1 positive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes or PD-L1 within gynecologic clear cell malignancies is limited and their role as a biomarker has not been explored. Methods This was a retrospective study of paraffin-embedded pure ovarian or uterine CCCs from 1992-2017. We assessed stage, endometriosis, and survival time. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for PD-1 associated TILs, PD-L1 percentage positivity, and PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) were performed. Results Of the 46 eligible patients, 35 were pure ovarian CCCs and 11 pure uterine CCCs. Most (29/46, 63.0%) were FIGO Stage I or II. We found 34.3% of ovarian tumors and 60% of the uterine tumors were PD-L1 CPS ≥1. PD-1 positive lymphocytes were present in 39.4% of ovarian tumors and 80% of the uterine tumors. When correlated to stage, ovarian cancer PD-L1 CPS was ≥1 in 28.6% stage I/II, 66.7% stage III, and 0% stage IV cancers (p=0.03) and PD-1 positive lymphocytes were found in 33.3% stage I/II, 66.7% stage III and 20% stage IV cancers (p=0.227). Within the uterine cohort, there were no significant differences in expression between stages. Multivariate analysis revealed no other significant correlations. There were no differences in overall survival for PD-L1 CPS positive versus negative cohorts among the ovarian cancer population (p = 0.79). Conclusions While limited by sample size, these findings suggest that more advanced ovarian cancer is less likely to express PD-L1 CPS, and that uterine cancers are more likely to have PD-1 positive lymphocytes than ovarian cancers. This biomarker information may better inform exploration of immune checkpoint therapy targeting.

Introduction/Background* Doublet chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus either platinum or topotecan) with bevacizumab (if eligible) is recommended for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC; Tewari 2014). In the second-line setting, there are limited data for available treatment options. Tisotumab vedotin (TV) is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate directed to tissue factor. In the phase 2 pivotal trial (innovaTV 204/ENGOT-cx6/GOG-3023) in r/mCC patients with disease progression on or after chemotherapy, TV demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable activity (objective response rate [ORR]: 24%; median duration of response [DOR]: 8.3 months) with a manageable and tolerable safety profile. Most adverse events associated with TV were mild to moderate. These findings support further investigation of TV in patients with r/mCC who progress on first-line treatment options. Methodology innovaTV 301/ENGOT-cx12/GOG-3057 (NCT04697628) is a global, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluating efficacy and safety of TV in patients with previously treated r/mCC. Eligible patients must be ≥18 years, have r/mCC, and have progressed after receiving 1–2 prior lines of therapy (either standard of care systemic chemotherapy doublet or platinum-based therapy with bevacizumab, if eligible). Approximately 482 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive 21-day cycles of TV (2.0 mg/kg IV once every 3 weeks) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy: topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Key secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, ORR, time to response, DOR, safety, and quality of life outcomes. The study is enrolling and will have sites in the USA, Europe, Japan, Latin America, Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea. Result(s)* Not applicable for trial in progress Conclusion* Not applicable for trial in progress

Introduction/Background* High-risk locally advanced cervical cancer has a poor prognosis, and more than half of patients recur in 2 years. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. The immunostimulatory activity of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab may be enhanced by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). After the KEYNOTE-158 study, in which pembrolizumab showed durable antitumor activity, pembrolizumab monotherapy was approved for patients with PD-L1–positive recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who progressed during or after chemotherapy. ENGOT-cx11/GOG 3047/KEYNOTE-A18 (NCT04221945) is a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating pembrolizumab with CCRT for the treatment of high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer. Methodology Approximately 980 patients with high-risk (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014 stage IB2-IIB with node-positive disease or stage III-IVA), locally advanced, histologically confirmed cervical cancer who have not received systemic therapy, immunotherapy, definitive surgery, or radiation will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 5 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) + CCRT followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W or 5 cycles of placebo Q3W + CCRT followed by 15 cycles of placebo Q6W. CCRT includes 5 cycles (optional 6th dose) of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 Q1W + EBRT followed by brachytherapy. Randomization is stratified by planned EBRT type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cancer stage at screening (stage IB2-IIB vs III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy dose. Treatment will continue until the patient has received 20 cycles of pembrolizumab (5 cycles 200 mg Q3W, 15 cycles 400 mg Q6W) vs placebo (~2 years) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by investigator and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include PFS by blinded independent central review, PFS at 2 years, OS at 3 years, complete response at 12 weeks, objective response rate, PFS and OS by PD-L1 status, quality of life, and safety. Enrolment began May 2020 and is planned for 193 sites in 30 countries. Klikněte nebo klepněte sem a zadejte text.

Balstilimab (anti-programmed death 1) and zalifrelimab (anti-CTLA-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors that have emerged as promising investigational agents for the treatment of cervical cancer, particularly in the setting of previously-treated, recurrent/metastatic disease. Here we describe the rationale and design of RaPiDS (NCT03894215), a two-arm Phase II study evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of balstilimab administered alone or in combination with zalifrelimab in patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point is objective response rate, and key secondary objectives include safety, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life outcomes.Lay abstract Current treatment options for women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer are limited. Immunotherapy is altering the therapeutic landscape in this setting yet opportunities remain to improve on current outcomes. Dual blockade of different immune checkpoints is an approach shown to be highly effective in other cancers. Balstilimab (anti-programmed death 1) and zalifrelimab (anti-CTLA-4) are two new checkpoint inhibitors showing promise in patients with advanced cervical cancer. The RaPiDS trial is designed to characterize the safety and activity of balstilimab, alone and in combination with zalifrelimab, in patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer who progressed after prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration: NCT03894215 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Purpose OTL38 is a folate-indole-cyanine green-like conjugate to folate receptor alpha (FRa). The objectives of this prospective trial were to assess the safety and efficacy (sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV)) of OTL38 for intraoperative imaging during epithelial ovarian cancer surgery. Methods Patients with suspected ovarian cancer planned for cytoreductive surgery were eligible to receive OTL38. Near-infrared (NIR) imaging was used to visualize target lesions that were evaluated by two blinded pathologists. A modified intent to treat (mITT) population of lesions from all patients who received OTL38-NIR imaging, underwent surgery, and had at least one FRa + target lesion was used to determine sensitivity and PPV. Two generalized linear models, with and without random effects, were employed to estimate sensitivity and PPV. Results Forty-four patients were evaluated for safety, and 225 lesions from 29 patients (the mITT population) were evaluated for efficacy. When assuming no correlation of interlesional results within a patient, sensitivity was estimated at 85.93% (95% lower boundary CI = 81.19) and PPV at 88.14% (95% lower boundary CI = 83.59). When controlling for actual correlation of detection among multiple lesions within a single patient (a random effect), sensitivity was estimated at 97.97% (95% lower boundary CI = 87.75) and PPV at 94.93% (95% lower boundary CI = 86.13). A total of 48.3% [14/29, (95% CI 0.29–0.67)] of patients had at least one additional lesion detected by OTL38 alone. Eight patients had mild drug-related adverse events including infusion reaction, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Conclusions OTL38-NIR was safe and efficacious in this phase II study regardless of folate expression levels and merits phase III evaluation.

PURPOSE We report the final, protocol-specified analysis of overall survival (OS) in GOG-0218, a phase III, randomized trial of bevacizumab in women with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS A total of 1,873 women with incompletely resected stage III to IV disease were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to six 21-day cycles of intravenous carboplatin (area under the concentration v time curve 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) versus chemotherapy plus concurrent bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, cycles 2 to 6) versus chemotherapy plus concurrent and maintenance bevacizumab (cycles 2 to 22). Inclusion criteria included a Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and no history of clinically significant vascular events or evidence of intestinal obstruction. OS was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 1,195 serum and/or tumor specimens were sequenced for BRCA1/2 and damaging mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Intratumoral microvessel density was studied using CD31 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Median follow-up was 102.9 months. Relative to control (n = 625), for patients receiving bevacizumab-concurrent (n = 625), the hazard ratio (HR) of death was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.20); for bevacizumab-concurrent plus maintenance (n = 623), the HR was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.09). Disease-specific survival was not improved in any arm. No survival advantage was observed after censoring patients who received bevacizumab at crossover or as second line. Median OS for stage IV bevacizumab-concurrent plus maintenance was 42.8 v 32.6 months for stage IV control (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95). Relative to wild type, the HR for death for BRCA1/2 mutated carcinomas was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.73), and for non- BRCA1/2 HRR, the HR was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.85). BRCA1/2, HRR, and CD31 were not predictive of bevacizumab activity. CONCLUSION No survival differences were observed for patients who received bevacizumab compared with chemotherapy alone. Testing for BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency is essential.

New technologies have advanced the science of tumor biology and genomics. Commercially available germline and somatic testing modalities have the downstream benefits of enabling prevention strategies in women with hereditary cancers and their family members in addition to identifying women who benefit most from novel targeted therapeutics. The matrix of available testing is complex and evolving. Women's health providers need to be versed in benefits and limitations of available testing. Genetic counselors play a pivotal role in interpretation of relevant mutations, and in avoiding common pitfalls, but their skill set is not sufficient to optimally integrate cancer genomics into clinical practice.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma, a rare histopathologic diagnosis, has a poor prognosis with high risk of progression during or shortly after completion of adjuvant treatment. We present two cases of undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: one in a postmenopausal female who experienced recurrent disease immediately after completion of adjuvant treatment and one in a premenopausal female who experienced disease progression while receiving adjuvant treatment. These cases exemplify the aggressive behavior of undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma and suggest the need for a more effective treatment in the upfront setting than the current standard of care for endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma., Highlights • Undifferentiated endometrial cancer represents an aggressive subset of endometrial cancer. • Limited literature is available to guide management. • High rates of loss of mismatch repair protein expression have been demonstrated.

TPS5620 Background: Chemotherapy resistance is a major concern in the treatment of advanced platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. One mechanism of resistance is driven by cortisol, which can suppress the apoptotic pathways that chemotherapy agents rely upon, eg, suppression of BCL2 and FOXO3a pathways. Preclinical and clinical data indicate that glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonism may reverse the anti-apoptotic effects of cortisol, thereby restoring the efficacy of cytotoxic agents. Relacorilant is a selective GR modulator that has shown promise in overcoming resistance when combined with taxanes (particularly nab-paclitaxel) in preclinical models (Greenstein & Hunt 2021) and early-phase clinical studies (Munster et al. 2019) in various solid tumors. A randomized, controlled phase 2 study of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel found clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR) without increased side effect burden in patients with recurrent, platinum-refractory and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (Colombo et al. 2021). The aim of this phase 3 study is to confirm these phase 2 findings in a larger patient population. Methods: ROSELLA (EudraCT 2022-000662-18, NCT pending) is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, multicenter study of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel compared to investigator’s choice of chemotherapy agents in patients with confirmed high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The trial is being conducted at multiple sites in North America and Europe and has a planned enrollment of 360 patients. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either relacorilant (150 mg the day before, day of, and day after nab-paclitaxel infusion) + nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, topotecan, or nab-paclitaxel). Randomization is stratified by prior lines of therapy (1 vs > 1), region of world (North America vs Europe), and prior bevacizumab (yes/no). Adult female patients with platinum-resistant disease (progression within 6 months of completion of platinum-containing therapy), excluding patients with primary platinum refractory disease, who have received 1–3 lines of prior systemic anticancer therapy and at least 1 prior line of platinum therapy are being enrolled. Life expectancy ≥3 months, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are required. The primary study endpoint is PFS by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS by investigator, overall response rate, best overall response, DOR, clinical benefit rate, safety, quality of life, CA-125, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. Clinical trial information: 2022-000662-18.

TPS5605 Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with improved perioperative safety outcomes, but, in 2018, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, a non-inferiority study comparing laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer, reported significantly worse disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in the MIS group. Criticisms of the LACC trial include lack of proper preoperative imaging and assessment, use of transcervical uterine manipulators, and lack of proper tumor containment leading to peritoneal contamination. Subsequent retrospective studies have reported conflicting results. Given the potential benefit of MIS, the ROCC trial seeks to address the limitations of the LACC trial. Methods: ROCC is a multi-center, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. The primary objective is to determine whether robotic-assisted (RBT) radical hysterectomy is not inferior to abdominal (OPEN) approach with respect to 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives include DSS, OS, patterns of recurrence, peri- and postoperative complications, long-term morbidity, impact on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and development of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). Key inclusion criteria include patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of FIGO 2018 stage IA2-IB2. All patients must have a preoperative pelvic MRI confirming that the cervical tumor is < 4 cm in size, no obvious evidence of extracervical extension and no nodal or other regional metastasis. Intraoperatively, the use of transcervical uterine manipulators is not allowed and specific detailed surgical techniques for proper tumor containment is required. Photographic evidence of specimen with tumor contained is mandated. We estimate the 3-year DFS to be 92% in the control (OPEN) arm. If the DFS does not differ by more than 7% and the one-sided 95% CI does not cross the non-inferiority boundary, then the RBT arm will be deemed non-inferior. 840 patients will be enrolled (420 per arm, 89 events total), which provides 90% power to exclude an absolute decrease in DFS by 7% (HR < = 1.375) with a log-rank test for non-inferiority with a one-sided alpha of 0.05. The primary analysis will be conducted in all randomized patients (ITT). Given the LACC findings of worse oncologic outcomes with MIS, a formal DSMC will conduct periodic reviews of safety including two planned formal interim analyses for futility (harm) after accrual of 370 and 640 patients using an aggressive Lan-DeMets beta-spending function similar to a Pocock boundary. Results of this trial may be practice changing and will either support or refute the findings of the LACC trial. The study is currently activating sites for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04831580.

5553 Background: In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in first-line setting, predictive factors of bevacizumab efficacy are needed, for selecting patients. In ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrisic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled CA-125 kinetic ELIMination rate constant KELIM) was a predictive biomarker. Among patients with high-risk diseases, only those with unfavorable KELIM had survival benefit from bevacizumab (mOS: 29.7 vs 20.6 months, HR = 0.78)(Colomban. JNCI CS 2020). The objective was to perform an external validation in GOG-0218 trial (NCT00262847). Methods: In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel +/- concurrent bevacizumab/placebo followed by a 15 month maintenance. Patient KELIM values were estimated with longitudinal CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days. The association between KELIM score (categorized as favorable ≥ 1, or unfavorable < 1) and efficacy of bevacizumab (bevacizumab-concurrent + maintenance, vs placebo) for PFS and OS was assessed using univariate/multivariate analyses, in a Training set with 2/3 patients managed the investigators, and then a Validation set with all patients, managed by NGR-GOG. Results: KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. In both sets, the patients with unfavorable KELIM derived benefit from bevacizumab compared to placebo (Training: PFS, HR = 0.65 [0.54-0.80]; OS, HR = 0.80 [0.65-0.99]; Validation: PFS, HR = 0.69 [0.59-0.82]; OS, HR = 0.87 [0.73-1.03]), whilst those with favorable KELIM had no benefit from bevacizumab (Training: PFS, HR = 0.96 [0.75-1.23]; OS, HR = 1.05 [0.80-1.37]; Validation, PFS, HR = 0.96 [0.79-1.17]; OS HR = 1.11 [0.89-1.84]). The highest benefit was observed in patients with high-risk diseases (stage IV or sub-optimally resected stage III) characterized by unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (Learning (n = 276): mPFS: 9.0 vs 5.2 months, HR = 0.61 [0.48-0.78]; Validation (n = 433): mPFS: 9.1 vs 5.6 months, HR = 0.64 [0.53-0.78]), and for OS (Learning (n = 278): mOS: 38.9 vs 27.9 months, HR = 0.72 [0.56-0.93], Validation set (n = 438): mOS: 35.1 vs 29.1 months, HR = 0.79 [0.65-0.97]). Conclusions: This validation analysis of GOG-0218 trial confirms the outcomes of ICON-7 trial about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent + maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab is mainly effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive diseases. No benefit was found in patients with favorable KELIM. The patients who derived the highest benefit from bevacizumab in PFS and OS (OS absolute benefit ̃ 6 to 9 months) were those with high-risk diseases (stage IV, or incompletely resected stage III) associated with an unfavorable KELIM score (calculator on https://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125).

Cervical cancer is a socially and scientifically distinguishable disease. Its pathogenesis, sexual transmission of high-risk HPV to a metaplastic portion of the uterine cervix, makes cervical cancer preventable by safe and effective HPV vaccines commercially available since 2006. Despite this, cervical cancer remains the deadliest gynecologic cancer in the world. Regrettably, global incidence and mortality rates disproportionately affect populations where women are marginalized, where HIV infection is endemic, and where access to preventive vaccination and screening for preinvasive disease are limited. In the United States, cervical cancer incidence has gradually declined over the last 25 years, but mortality rates remain both constant and disparately higher among communities of color because of the adverse roles that racism and poverty play in outcome. Until these conditions improve and widespread prevention is possible, treatment innovations are warranted. The last standard-of-care treatment changes occurred in 1999 for locally advanced disease and in 2014 for metastatic and recurrent disease. The viral and immunologic nature of HPV-induced cervical cancer creates opportunities for both radiation and immunotherapy to improve outcomes. With the advent of T cell–directed therapy, immune checkpoint inhibition, and techniques to increase the therapeutic window of radiation treatment, an overdue wave of innovation is currently emerging in cervical cancer treatment. The purpose of this review is to describe the contemporary developmental therapeutic landscape for cervical cancer that applies to most tumors and to discuss notable rare histologic subtypes that will not be adequately addressed with these treatment innovations.

Summary Background Few effective second-line treatments exist for women with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tisotumab vedotin, a tissue factor-directed antibody–drug conjugate, in this patient population. Methods This multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study was done across 35 academic centres, hospitals, and community practices in Europe and the USA. The study included patients aged 18 years or older who had recurrent or metastatic squamous cell, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cervical cancer; disease progression on or after doublet chemotherapy with bevacizumab (if eligible by local standards); who had received two or fewer previous systemic regimens for recurrent or metastatic disease; had measurable disease based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1); and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received 2·0 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 200 mg) tisotumab vedotin intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression (determined by the independent review committee) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate based on RECIST (version 1.1), as assessed by the independent review committee. Activity and safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of the drug. This study is ongoing with recruitment completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03438396. Findings 102 patients were enrolled between June 12, 2018, and April 11, 2019; 101 patients received at least one dose of tisotumab vedotin. Median follow-up at the time of analysis was 10·0 months (IQR 6·1–13·0). The confirmed objective response rate was 24% (95% CI 16–33), with seven (7%) complete responses and 17 (17%) partial responses. The most common treatment-related adverse events included alopecia (38 [38%] of 101 patients), epistaxis (30 [30%]), nausea (27 [27%]), conjunctivitis (26 [26%]), fatigue (26 [26%]), and dry eye (23 [23%]). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were reported in 28 (28%) patients and included neutropenia (three [3%] patients), fatigue (two [2%]), ulcerative keratitis (two [2%]), and peripheral neuropathies (two [2%] each with sensory, motor, sensorimotor, and neuropathy peripheral). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 (13%) patients, the most common of which included peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy (two [2%] patients) and pyrexia (two [2%]). One death due to septic shock was considered by the investigator to be related to therapy. Three deaths unrelated to treatment were reported, including one case of ileus and two unknown causes. Interpretation Tisotumab vedotin showed clinically meaningful and durable antitumour activity with a manageable and tolerable safety profile in women with previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Given the poor prognosis for this patient population and the low activity of current therapies in this setting, tisotumab vedotin, if approved, would represent a new treatment for women with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Funding Genmab, Seagen, Gynaecologic Oncology Group, and European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups.

Highlights • The COVID-19 pandemic has required adaptability in the workplace. • Women health care professionals are disproportionately affected by the burdens resulting from the pandemic. • Flexible work options are critical to ensure staff have the resources to provide cancer care and clinical trial options., Despite the impact of the COVD-19 pandemic and public health crisis on health care delivery, the GOG-Foundation has continued to prioritize the delivery of novel and state-of-the-science treatment options to patients via clinical trials.

Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic forced a shift in conducting clinical research. Ensuring the safety of all stakeholders (patients, research personnel, family members), maintaining financial viability, and overcoming operational restrictions (limited access to sites, workforce restrictions, reduced data collection) are barriers to continuing clnical research. GOG Partners, the GOG Foundation industry-sponsored clinical trials group, has been proactive to implement the following: 1) immediate compliance with CDC, FDA, and NIH guidelines with regard to clinical trial management; 2) systems that allowed for remote monitoring and other remote activities (telemedicine patient visits, remote data collection, shipping of drug to patients, virtual study start-up); 3) enhance enrollment opportunites away from university-based sites towards community-based practices; 4) increased frequency of our operations meetings with industry. The objective of this report is to describe how the pandemic affected accrual to GOG Partners’ trials. Methods: Accrual data for GOG Partners trials over the past 4 years (2017- July 2020) were collected. ‘Pandemic’ months were considered March thru July 2020. Information collected included accrual numbers, institution type (university versus non-university), and region of country. Descriptive statistics were analyzed. Results: Over the past 4 years, the median monthly accrual to GOG Partners trials was 43 patients (range: 14-95). Between March and July 2020, the median accrual was 59 patients (range: 43-72). For the same 5-month period over the past 3 years (March to July 2017, 2018, 2019) the median accrual was 36 (14-95). Accrual in March 2020 was 69 patients. Accrual decreased to 43 patients in April 2020 and 47 patients in May 2020 with respective z-scores of -0.25 and -0.01. June and July 2020 showed increased accrual with 59 and 72 patients respectively. The median number of participating sites per month over the past 4 years was 32 (9-66). There was an immediate decline in the number of sites participating from April to May 2020 of 36%. The number of sites participating in June and July were 38 and 52, respectively. During the pandemic, the accrual in the New England, Mid-Atlantic, Pacific and South Atlantic regions varied from their baselines. These variations followed the trends in COVID-19 spread. Non-university institutions accrued at a near-average rate throughout the months of April and May. During that same period, universities observed a decline in accrual of 48%. Conclusions: Accrual to GOG Partners’ trials increased 37% over the median monthly accrual since the pandemic began. During the pandemic, total monthly accrual fell below or reached the median during only 1 month. Regional diversity of sites participating in GOG Partners’ studies helped in preventing a more dramatic drop in participation. While overall accrual has historically shown to be relatively balanced between institution types, non-university institutions were less negatively impacted.

Background High-risk locally advanced cervical cancer (CC) has a poor prognosis, and >50% of patients recur in 2 years. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may enhance the immunostimulatory activity of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab. After KEYNOTE-158, in which pembrolizumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity, pembrolizumab monotherapy was approved for patients with PD-L1–positive recurrent or metastatic CC who progressed during or after chemotherapy. ENGOT-cx11/KEYNOTE-A18 (NCT04221945) is a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating pembrolizumab with concurrent CRT in locally advanced CC. Trial design Approximately 980 patients with high-risk, locally advanced, histologically confirmed CC who have not received systemic therapy, immunotherapy, definitive surgery, or radiation will be randomized 1:1 to receive 5 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W + CRT (5 cycles [with optional 6th cycle] of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 Q1W + external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] followed by brachytherapy) followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W or 5 cycles of placebo Q3W + CRT followed by 15 cycles of placebo Q6W. Randomization is stratified by planned EBRT type, cancer stage at screening, and planned total radiotherapy dose. Treatment will continue until patient receives ≤20 cycles of pembrolizumab (5 cycles 200 mg Q3W, 15 cycles 400 mg Q6W) vs placebo (~2 years) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoints are PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. Secondary endpoints include PFS at 2 years, OS at 3 years, complete response at 12 weeks, ORR, PFS and OS in PD-L1–positive patients, and safety. Enrollment is ongoing.

Homologous recombination deficiency is a critical biologic feature of ovarian cancer. This weakness in DNA damage repair relies on functional poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, orally available and initially approved for maintenance therapy in women with ovarian cancer by the US FDA in 2017 and by the EMA in 2017 for the same indication. Ovarian cancer represents the most lethal of gynecologic malignancies. The efficacy of niraparib has changed the landscape of ovarian cancer treatment, but overall survival data is still to come. This review summarizes the data regarding niraparib mechanism of action, toxicities, single agent efficacy and novel combinations in ovarian cancer.

Introduction Despite an increasing number of female service members, incidence rates of gynecologic cancers (other than cervical cancer) have not been previously documented in the U.S. active duty military population. This study sought to determine the incidence rates of all gynecologic, including peritoneal, malignancies in the U.S. Active Duty population compared to the general US population as reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Materials and Methods Gynecologic cancers diagnosed in U.S. Active Duty women aged 20–59 between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively ascertained. Cancer cases were identified in both the Automated Central Tumor Registry and the Military Health System Data Repository. All cases in Automated Central Tumor Registry plus cases recorded in Military Health System Data Repository, but not duplicative of Automated Central Tumor Registry cases, were included. Age-specific and age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated in military and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cases. Results In U.S. Active Duty women, 327 incident cases of gynecologic cancer were identified. There were 110 cases of cervical cancer, 40 cases of endometrial cancer, 152 cases of ovarian cancer, and 25 other gynecologic malignancies. Of the 327 cases, 154 were ascertained from the Automated Central Tumor Registry database and the remainder from Military Health System Data Repository claims data. The age-adjusted rate of all gynecologic cancers for U.S. Active Duty women was 49.17 per 105 (95%CI 37.58, 65.12), while the age-adjusted rate for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results −18 was 42.09 per 105 (95%CI 41.83, 42.35). The kappa coefficient assessing the overlap between the data sources was −0.1937. Though insufficient in numbers for statistical analysis, the observed proportion of ovarian to cervical cancer cases in active duty women Conclusions U.S. Active Duty women exhibited a similar age-adjusted rate of gynecologic cancer as the general US population. There was suboptimal overlap between the Automated Central Tumor Registry and Military Health System Data Repository databases, indicating the necessity of using both databases in order to obtain reliable data in the active duty population. This study is the current best estimate of a baseline rate of gynecologic cancer in U.S. active duty military women. This rate might change over time as women’s roles and exposures in recent and future military conflicts evolve.

OBJECTIVES: Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a histone methyl transferase that mediates epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes. It is commonly over-expressed in several solid tumors and has been shown to be a prognostic biomarker. We investigated patterns of EZH2 expression in endometrial cancer. METHODS: Evaluation of EZH2 expression was completed on both early and advanced stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma tissues and a subset of matched normal mullerian tissue samples, from participants enrolled in Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocol 210, using real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blot (WB) analysis. Non-parametric methods were used to assess differences in mRNA and protein expression respectively with known clinical/pathologic prognostic factors. Survival analysis was performed using techniques including Cox proportional hazards (PH) model to evaluate differences in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on EZH2 expression. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patient samples were analyzed that included 60 tumors and 27 matched-normal tissue specimens. EZH2 mRNA (p < .0001) and protein expression (p < .0001) in tumor specimens were significantly higher than in matched-normal tissue. In primary tumors, EZH2 protein expression was associated with lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI, p = .044), and EZH2 mRNA expression was associated with age (p = .037). Differences in EZH2 expression between primary tumors and matched normal tissue were not associated with other known clinical and pathologic factors. However, there did appear to be a trend toward decreased progression-free survival among patients with high EZH2 expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the differential expression of EZH2 in uterine cancers compared to normal tissues. However, there were no statistically significant differences in survival associated with EZH2 expression in patients with endometrial cancer.

The treatment of women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is aggressive surgical cytoreduction and a combination of platinum plus taxane chemotherapy. The timing and extent of surgery has direct implications on the selection of subsequent treatment as well as the prognosis of patients with EOC. Frontline chemotherapeutic regimens have evolved through a series of large multi-institutional randomized clinical trials that focused on targeted agents as maintenance therapy. On June 13, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved adding bevacizumab to adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy followed by maintenance based on the results of Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 218. Maintenance olaparib was FDA-approved on December 19, 2018, for frontline maintenance among those with advanced EOC who respond to frontline chemotherapy and harbor a germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. This was based on the results of SOLO-1. Despite a strong rationale and extensive study, intraperitoneal chemotherapy has not been adopted in clinical practice. Alternatively, heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown promise as a more tolerable and technically feasible method of regional therapy, but widespread application will require more evidence. Significant strides have also been made in understanding the biology of EOC, resulting in a personalized approach to first-line therapy. One approach calls for recognizing differences in histologic subtypes and molecular alterations, which may open up alternative therapeutic interventions.

Staying current on the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape in oncology is challenging for clinicians. This commentary discusses exciting practice-changing data specific to ovarian cancer.

5503 Background: Pafolacianine sodium is under investigation as an adjunct to visual inspection and palpation by providing intra-operative imaging of folate receptor positive (FR+) ovarian cancer. Since complete resection (R0) is the strongest predictor of overall survival, methods to enhance detection of lesions are expected to benefit patient outcomes. Methods: For this phase 3, randomized, multicenter, single dose, open-label pivotal trial (NCT03180307), patients with ovarian cancer who were scheduled to undergo cytoreductive surgery were recruited from 11 sites in the US and Netherlands from March 2018 through April 2020. The study objectives were to confirm efficacy and safety of pafolacianine sodium (0.025 mg/kg i.v., ≥1 h prior to imaging) in combination with intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging to detect additional lesions not detected by palpation and normal white light alone. Results: Pafolacianine sodium was administered to 150 total patients (safety analysis set); 109 patients comprised the full analysis set for efficacy analyses. Patients had primarily serous adenocarcinoma (n = 72; 68.6%) and advanced stage disease (n = 83; 76.1%). In 33% of patients (36 of 109), NIRF imaging with pafolacianine sodium identified additional lesions that were not planned for resection and were not detected by normal white light and palpation ( P < 0.001, 95% CI [0.243, 0.427]). Among patients who underwent interval debulking surgery, the rate was higher, at 39.7% of patients (23 of 58; 95% CI [0.270, 0.534]). At the individual lesion level, the accuracy of pafolacianine sodium with NIRF to detect ovarian cancer is reflected by sensitivity of 83% (95% CI [73.9, 89.4]) and a false positive rate of 32.7% (95% CI [25.6, 40.7]). Investigators reported achieving complete resection (R0) in 62.4% (68 of 109) of patients. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 30% of patients (45 out of 150). The most frequently reported drug-related AEs were nausea (18.0%), vomiting (5.3%), and abdominal pain (4.7%). Infusion reactions at the time of the procedure were mostly (96%) mild or moderate in severity; 89% resolved within 24 hours of onset. No drug-related serious AEs or deaths were reported. Conclusions: This phase 3 trial of pafolacianine sodium with NIRF imaging met its primary endpoint, intraoperatively identifying additional cancer not planned for resection in a statistically significant number of patients. Therefore, pafolacianine sodium may offer a novel real-time adjunct to current surgical imaging practice in ovarian cancer surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT03180307.

TPS5596 Background: Doublet chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus either platinum or topotecan) with bevacizumab (if eligible) is recommended for first-line treatment of recurrent (not amenable to curative therapy) or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC; Tewari 2014). In the second-line setting, there are limited data for currently available treatment options. Tisotumab vedotin (TV) is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a tissue factor (TF)-directed human monoclonal antibody covalently linked to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) via a protease-cleavable linker. TV is directed to cells expressing TF and releases MMAE upon internalization, resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death. TV has anti-tumor activity on multiple tumor types and kills tumor cells by direct cytotoxicity, bystander cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, and in a manner consistent with immunogenic cell death. In a recent phase 2 pivotal trial (innovaTV 204), TV demonstrated a clinically meaningful objective response rate (ORR) of 24% and median duration of response (DOR) of 8.3 months, as well as a manageable and tolerable safety profile with most adverse events being mild to moderate, in r/mCC patients with disease progression on or after chemotherapy. These findings support further investigation of TV in patients with r/mCC who progress on available first-line treatment options. Methods: The innovaTV 301 trial (NCT04697628) is a global, randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of TV in patients with previously treated r/mCC. Eligible patients must be ≥18 years, have r/mCC, and have experienced disease progression after receiving 1-2 prior lines of therapy (either standard of care systemic chemotherapy doublet or platinum-based therapy [if eligible; paclitaxel+cisplatin+bevacizumab, paclitaxel+carboplatin+bevacizumab, or paclitaxel+topotecan/nogitecan+bevacizumab]). Approximately 482 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive 21-day cycles of either TV (2.0 mg/kg IV once every 3 weeks) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy: topotecan (1 or 1.25 mg/m2 IV; Day 1 [D1] to D5 of each cycle), vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 IV; D1 and D8 of each cycle), gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 IV; D1 and D8 of each cycle), irinotecan (100 or 125 mg/m2 IV; weekly for 28days, then every 42 days), or pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 IV, D1 of each cycle). The primary endpoint of this trial is overall survival. Key secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, ORR, time to response, DOR, safety, and quality of life outcomes. The study is currently enrolling and will have sites open in the US, EU, Japan, Latin America, Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea. Clinical trial information: NCT04697628.

TPS5607 Background: XMT-1536 (upifitamab rilsodotin), is a first-in-class Dolaflexin ADC targeting NaPi2b, a sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein, broadly expressed in solid tumors such as serous epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma. XMT-1536 uses the Dolaflexin platform to deliver approximately 10 DolaLock auristatin payload molecules per antibody and is being evaluated in a Phase I study (NCT03319628). Observation of preliminary antitumor activity was reported in the ovarian cancer expansion cohort, including in patients previously treated with bevacizumab and PARPi (Tolcher et al, ASCO 2019; Richardson et al, ASCO 2019; Hamilton et al, ESMO 2020). Updated data on the OC cohort included 31 patients with higher NaPi2b expression as of December 2020 (Mersana Therapeutics, 2021). In these patients, the ORR was 32% and the DCR was 74%. Complete responses were observed in 2 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, both of whom had received prior treatment with bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors. Platinum resistant ovarian cancer remains a serious unmet medical need as treatment options are limited and response rates to these treatments are low. Based on the favorable safety and efficacy profile of XMT-1536, UPLIFT was designed as a Phase 2 single-arm registrational cohort of patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer as part of the ongoing Phase I FIH dose escalation and expansion study to accelerate development and provide a streamlined pathway to regulatory review. Methods: The UPLIFT cohort is enrolling patients with platinum resistant high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer with up to 4 prior lines of therapy. The RP2D of XMT-1536 was determined to be 43 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 4 weeks (q4w) and will be the dose evaluated in the UPLIFT cohort. UPLIFT will enroll approximately 180 patients with platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer to obtain approximately 100 patients with higher NaPi2b expression. Prior bevacizumab is required for those patients with 1 or 2 prior lines of therapy. Tumor samples (fresh or archived) will be collected prior to enrollment for retrospective tumor tissue evaluation of NaPi2b expression. The primary objective is assessment of confirmed objective response rate to XMT-1536 as assessed by Investigator in patients with higher NaPi2b expression. Secondary endpoints include confirmed objective response rate regardless of NaPi2b expression, duration of response, and adverse events. Correlative aims include assessing blood and tissue biomarkers for association with clinical benefit. This study is being conducted in collaboration with ENGOT and GOG. Patients will be enrolled globally. Clinical trial information: NCT03319628.