Search

Screening for cognitive impairment (CI) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) relies on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) neuropsychological battery (NB). By studying the concurrent criterion validity, our goal was to assess the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a screening tool for CI compared to the ACR-NB and to evaluate the added value of the MoCA to the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM).A total of 285 adult SLE patients were administered the ACR-NB, MoCA, and ANAM. For the ACR-NB, patients were classified as having CI if there was a Z score of ≤-1.5 in ≥2 domains. The area under the curve (AUC) and sensitivities/specificities were determined. A discriminant function analysis was applied to assess the ability of the MoCA to differentiate between CI, undetermined CI, and non-CI patients.CI was not accurately identified by the MoCA compared to the ACR-NB (AUC of 0.66). Sensitivity and specificity were poor at 50% and 69%, respectively, for the cutoff of 26, and 80% and 45%, respectively, for the cutoff of 28. The MoCA had a low ability to identify CI status. The addition of the MoCA to the ANAM led to improvement on the AUC by only 2.5%.The MoCA does not have adequate concurrent criterion validity to accurately identify CI in patients with SLE. The low specificity of the MoCA may lead to overdiagnosis and concern among patients. Adding the MoCA to the ANAM does not substantially improve the accuracy of the ANAM. These results do not support using the MoCA as a screening tool for CI in patients with SLE.

Objectives Cognitive dysfunction (CD) is a common manifestation of SLE that can have detrimental consequences for those affected. To date, no treatments have been approved for SLE-CD. This study aims to assess the association of azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate (MMF) use with SLE-CD, given that these medications have demonstrated neuroprotective qualities in prior studies. Methods Consecutive adult SLE patients presenting to a single healthcare center were considered for participation. The ACR neuropsychological battery for SLE was administered to consenting patients at 0, 6 and 12 months. Scores were compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Primary outcome was CD, defined as a z-score ≤−1.5 in two or more cognitive domains. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were constructed to estimate the odds of CD with respect to AZA and MMF use. Results A total of 300 participants representing 676 patient visits completed the study; 114 (38%) met criteria for CD at baseline. The cumulative AZA dose (g/kg) was associated with reduced odds of CD [odds ratio (OR) 0.76 (95% CI 0.58, 0.98), P = 0.04]. Years of AZA treatment was also associated with reduced odds of CD [OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.54, 0.97), P = 0.03]. MMF use was not associated with CD. Conclusion AZA use was associated with significantly lower odds of SLE-CD, while MMF use was not. Additional studies are warranted to further investigate the relationship of AZA and SLE-CD.

Background There is limited prospective data on the prevalence, timing of onset, and characteristics of acute headache following concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. Methods Adults diagnosed with concussion (arising from injuries not related to work or motor vehicle accidents) were recruited from emergency departments and seen within one week post injury wherein they completed questionnaires assessing demographic variables, pre-injury headache history, post-injury headache history, and the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT-3) symptom checklist, the Sleep and Concussion Questionnaire (SCQ) and mood/anxiety on the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Results A total of 302 participants (59% female) were enrolled (mean age 33.6 years) and almost all (92%) endorsed post-traumatic headache (PTH) with 94% endorsing headache onset within 24 hours of injury. Headache location was not correlated with site of injury. Most participants (84%) experienced daily headache. Headache quality was pressure/squeezing in 69% and throbbing/pulsing type in 22%. Associated symptoms included: photophobia (74%), phonophobia (72%) and nausea (55%). SCAT-3 symptom scores, Brief Symptom Inventory and Sleep and Concussion Questionnaire scores were significantly higher in those endorsing acute PTH. No significant differences were found in week 1 acute PTH by sex, history of migraine, pre-injury headache frequency, anxiety, or depression, nor presence/absence of post-traumatic amnesia and self-reported loss of consciousness. Conclusions This study highlights the very high incidence of acute PTH following concussion, the timing of onset and characteristics of acute PTH, the associated psychological and sleep disturbances and notes that the current ICHD-3 criteria for headaches attributed to mild traumatic injury to the head are reasonable, the interval between injury and headache onset should not be extended beyond seven days and could, potentially, be shorted to allow for greater diagnostic precision.

Objective To review: 1) degree of conformity to the American College of Rheumatology neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB) among studies that used a NB, 2) review definitions of cognitive impairment (CI) from studies that used a NB, and 3) characterize measurement tools used to assess CI in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods The literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO for articles on CI in adult SLE patients. We reviewed studies that used a NB and compared their tests to the ACR-NB to assess the degree of conformity. Definitions of CI from studies that used a NB were reviewed when sufficient information was available. We reviewed and categorized CI measurement tools into four broad categories: NB, screening, incomplete/mixed batteries, and computerized batteries. Results Of 8727 references, 118 were selected for detailed review and 97 were included in the final analysis. Of 43 studies that used a NB, none of the studies used the ACR-NB exactly as published. Many studies supplemented with other tests. Overall, there was inconsistent use of ACR-NB tests. Definitions for CI varied, with cut-offs ranging from 1 to 3 standard deviations below normative values on domains/tests varying in type and number. The most frequently used measurement tool for assessing CI in SLE was a NB. Use of screening tests and computerized batteries have also increased over the last decade. Conclusion The assessment and definition of CI in SLE remains heterogeneous. A consensus meeting to address existing inconsistencies should be considered to harmonize the field of CI in SLE.

Post-acute sequelae of SARS-COV-2 (PASC) is growing in prevalence, and involves symptoms originating from the central neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, autonomic nervous, or immune systems. There are non-specific symptoms such as fatigue, headaches, and brain fog, which cannot be ascribed to a single system/organ. PASC places a notable strain on our healthcare system, which is already laden with a large number of acute-COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, it impedes social, academic and vocational functioning, and impacts family life, relationships, and work/financial life. The treatment for PASC needs to target this non-specific etiology and wide-ranging sequelae. In conditions similar to PASC, such as “chemo brain”, and prolonged symptoms of concussion, the non-specific symptoms have shown to be effectively managed through education and strategies for self-management and Mindfulness interventions. However, such interventions have yet to be empirically evaluated in PASC to our knowledge. In response to this gap, we have developed a virtual education intervention synthesized by psychiatrists and clinical psychologists for the current study. We will undertake a two-phase randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility (Phase 1; N = 90) and efficacy (Phase 2; sample sized based on phase 1 results) of the novel 8 week education and self-management strategies group compared to a mindfulness skills program, both delivered virtually. Main outcomes include confidence/ability to self-manage symptoms, quality of life, and healthcare utilization. This study stands to mitigate the deleterious intrusiveness of symptoms on everyday life in patients with PASC, and may also help to reduce the impact of PASC on the healthcare system.

Objective To phenotype SLE based on symptom burden (disease damage, system involvement and patient reported outcomes), with a specific focus on objective and subjective cognitive function. Methods SLE patients ages 18–65 years underwent objective cognitive assessment using the ACR Neuropsychological Battery (ACR-NB) and data were collected on demographic and clinical variables, disease burden/activity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depression, anxiety, fatigue and perceived cognitive deficits. Similarity network fusion (SNF) was used to identify patient subtypes. Differences between the subtypes were evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis and χ2 tests. Results Of the 238 patients, 90% were female, with a mean age of 41 years (s.d. 12) and a disease duration of 14 years (s.d. 10) at the study visit. The SNF analysis defined two subtypes (A and B) with distinct patterns in objective and subjective cognitive function, disease burden/damage, HRQoL, anxiety and depression. Subtype A performed worst on all significantly different tests of objective cognitive function (P Conclusion This study demonstrates the complexity of cognitive impairment (CI) in SLE and that individual, multifactorial phenotypes exist. Those with greater disease burden, from SLE-specific factors or other factors associated with chronic conditions, report poorer cognitive functioning and perform worse on objective cognitive measures. By exploring different ways of phenotyping SLE we may better define CI in SLE. Ultimately this will aid our understanding of personalized CI trajectories and identification of appropriate treatments.

Concussion imaging research has primarily focused on neuronal disruption with lesser emphasis directed toward vascular dysfunction. However, blood flow metrics may be more sensitive than measures of neuronal integrity. Vascular dysfunction can be assessed by measuring cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR)-the change in cerebral blood flow per unit change in vasodilatory stimulus. CVR metrics, including speed and magnitude of flow responses to a standardized well-controlled vasoactive stimulus, are potentially useful for assessing individual subjects following concussion given that blood flow dysregulation is known to occur with traumatic brain injury. We assessed changes in CVR metrics to a standardized vasodilatory stimulus during the acute phase of concussion. Using a case control design, 20 concussed participants and 20 healthy controls (HCs) underwent CVR assessment measuring blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging using precise changes in end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 (PETCO2). Metrics were calculated for the whole brain, gray matter (GM), and white matter (WM) using sex-stratification. A leave-one-out receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis classified concussed from HCs based on CVR metrics. CVR magnitude was greater and speed of response faster in concussed participants relative to HCs, with WM showing higher classification accuracy compared with GM. ROC analysis for WM-CVR metrics revealed an area under the curve of 0.94 in males and 0.90 in females for speed and magnitude of response respectively. These greater than normal responses to a vasodilatory stimulus warrant further investigation to compare the predictive ability of CVR metrics against structural injury metrics for diagnosis and prognosis in acute concussion.

Background: The mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) has been at the forefront throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While workplace-based support programs have been developed in hospitals globally, few systematically collected data. While critical to their success, information on these programs and the experience of mental healthcare providers (MHP) who support colleagues is limited. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of MHP caring for HCW colleagues within a novel workplace-based mental health support program during the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide insights on facilitators, areas for improvement and barriers to program sustainability. Methods: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews conducted by videoconference between September 2020 to October 2021. UHN CARES (University Health Network Coping and Resilience for Employees and Staff) Program was developed during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. It supports over 21,000 staff members within the UHN, Canada’s largest academic health research institution, in Toronto, Canada. Purposive sampling was used to select 10 of the 22 MHP in the UHN CARES Program. Using a critical realism framework, key components required to sustain a successful workplace-based mental health support program for HCWs and balance the needs of MHP were determined. Results: Six psychiatrists and four psychologists with varying roles at UHN participated in 17 interviews, with repeat interviews exploring changes over time within the pandemic and program. Components which facilitated the success of the program included flexibility in scheduling, confidential health record storage, comprehensive administrative support, availability of resources and adaptive quality improvement approach. Recommendations for improvement included opportunities for peer supervision, triaging of cases, and managing HCW expectations. MHP found caring for HCWs to be meaningful and they utilized existing clinical skills during sessions. Challenges included working in a virtual setting, navigating boundaries when caring for colleagues, and managing the range of service users and their needs.Conclusions: These findings suggest how support programs can be structured for HCWs, how to provide support, and how to sustain this support, allowing health systems to balance the needs of HCWs and MHPs in preparation for future public health emergencies.

Objective We previously demonstrated the utility of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) for screening cognitive impairment (CI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and developed composite indices for interpreting ANAM results. Our objectives here were to provide further support for the ANAM’s concurrent criterion validity against the American College of Rheumatology neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB), identify the most discriminatory subtests and scores of the ANAM for predicting CI, and provide a new approach to interpret ANAM results using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. Methods 300 adult SLE patients completed an adapted ACR-NB and ANAM on the same day. As per objectives, six models were built using combinations of ANAM subtests and scores and submitted to CART analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the ANAM’s criterion validity compared to the adapted ACR-NB; the most discriminatory ANAM subtests and scores in each model were selected, and performance of models with the highest AUCs were compared to our previous composite indices; decision trees were generated for models with the highest AUCs. Results Two models had excellent AUCs of 86 and 89%. Eight most discriminatory ANAM subtests and scores were identified. Both models demonstrated higher AUCs against our previous composite indices. An adapted decision tree was created to simplify the interpretation of ANAM results. Conclusion We provide further validity evidence for the ANAM as a valid CI screening tool in SLE. The decision tree improves interpretation of ANAM results, enhancing clinical utility.

Objectives To examine i) the relationship between neuropsychological performance and depression and anxiety over time, and ii) the overlap between classification of cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, and depression in SLE. Methods 301 patients with SLE were included. Cognition was measured using a modified version of the ACR neuropsychological battery; cognitive dysfunction was defined as z-scores ≤-1.5 on ≥2 domains. Depression and anxiety were measured using the Beck Depression Inventory-II and the Beck Anxiety Inventory, respectively. All measures were assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Their relationships were analyzed using Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA). Results Anxiety and depression and neuropsychological performance were stable across time. Factor analysis identified two dimensions explaining 42.2% of the variance in neuropsychological performance. The first dimension (33.1% of the variance) included primarily complex cognitive tests measuring executive function; verbal, visual, and working memory; and complex processing speed. The second dimension (9.1% of the variance) included primarily measures of simple information processing speed or motor dexterity. Anxiety and depression scores were consistently related to the first cognitive dimension. There was substantial overlap in participants classified with cognitive dysfunction and anxiety and depression. Conclusions Depression and anxiety symptoms in SLE patients are related to a cognitive dimension incorporating memory, executive function and complex processing speed in a stable manner across one year. Many patients with cognitive dysfunction exhibit clinically significant anxiety and depression. Further research should examine whether cognition improves when anxiety and depression are treated and mechanistic links between anxiety and depression and cognitive dysfunction in SLE.

ObjectiveDispersion, or variability in an individual’s performance across multiple tasks at a single assessment visit, has been associated with cognitive dysfunction (CD) in many neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders. We aimed to compute a dispersion score using neuropsychological battery (NB) tests and determine its association with CD in patients with SLE.MethodsCD was defined as a z-score of ≤−1.5 on ≥2 domains of the NB. To compute a type of dispersion score known as the intraindividual SD (ISD), the SD of age-adjusted and sex-adjusted z-scores was calculated for each visit in each patient. To estimate the association between ISD and cognitive status (CD and non-CD), we used multilevel logistic regression, adjusting for clinically important covariates.ResultsA total of 301 adult patients with SLE completed the NB at baseline, 187 of whom were reassessed at 6 months and 189 at 12 months. CD was observed in 35.2% of patients at baseline, 27.8% at 6 months and 28.0% at 12 months. Prior to covariate adjustment, the mean ISD for non-CD was 1.10±0.31 compared with 1.50±0.70 for CD. After adjusting for ethnicity, education, employment, socioeconomic status and anxiety/depression, there was a statistically significant association between ISD and CD (OR for one-unit increase in ISD: 13.56, 95% CI 4.80 to 38.31; OR for 1/10th-unit increase in ISD: 1.30, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.44). Findings were valid across multiple sensitivity analyses.ConclusionThis is the first study to show that patients with SLE who were classified as having CD by the NB had more variability across the NB tests (ie, higher ISD score) compared with those who were not classified as having CD.

OBJECTIVE Screening for cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) conventionally relies on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) neuropsychologic battery (NB), which is not universally available. To develop a more accessible screening approach, we assessed validity of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM). Using the ACR NB as the gold standard for cognitive impairment classification, the objectives were 1) to measure overall discriminative validity of the ANAM for cognitive impairment versus no cognitive impairment, 2) to identify ANAM subtests and scores that best differentiate patients with cognitive impairment from those with no cognitive impairment, and 3) to derive ANAM composite indices and cutoffs. METHODS A total of 211 consecutive adult patients, female and male, with SLE were administered the ANAM and ACR NB. 1) For overall discriminative validity of the ANAM, we compared patients with cognitive impairment versus those with no cognitive impairment on 4 scores. 2) Six ANAM models using different scores were developed, and the most discriminatory subtests were selected using logistic regression analyses. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to establish ANAM validity against the ACR NB. 3) ANAM composite indices and cutoffs were derived for the best models, and sensitivities and specificities were calculated. RESULTS Patients with no cognitive impairment performed better on most ANAM subtests, supporting ANAM's discriminative validity. Cognitive impairment could be accurately identified by selected ANAM subtests with top models, demonstrating excellent AUCs of 81% and 84%. Derived composite indices and cutoffs demonstrated sensitivity of 78-80% and specificity of 70%. CONCLUSION This study provides support for ANAM's discriminative validity for cognitive impairment and utility for cognitive screening in adult SLE. Derived composite indices and cutoffs enhance clinical applicability.

Background Cognitive impairment (CI) is a common neurobehavioural manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In our recent systematic review, the prevalence of CI was 38% (95% CI 33% to 43%) with a wide variation (15%–79%), which may be due to differences in CI definitions and selection of neuropsychological tests across studies. We aim to report the prevalence of CI in a large cohort using a comprehensive battery (CB) of tests in which we operationalized the classification of CI. Methods Consecutive consenting SLE patients, aged 18–65 years, who attended a single center (Jul 2016-Feb 2018) were recruited. Patients were administered a CB that evaluates the major cognitive domains: Manual motor speed and dexterity, simple attention and processing speed, visual-spatial construction, verbal fluency, learning and memory (visuospatial and memory), executive functioning (untimed and timed). Patient scores were compared to a normative sample of age- and gender-matched healthy controls to obtain z-scores. CI was operationalized on the CB as a z-score of ≤−1.5 (as compared to controls) on ≥2 domains or z≤−2.0 on ≥1 domain. Descriptive statistics were used. Results Of the 199 patients (89% female), the mean age at SLE diagnosis was 28.3±10.4 and disease duration at enrolment was 14.3±10.2 years. The prevalence of CI was 37.7% (z≤−1.5 in ≥2 domains) and 49.8% (z≤−2.0 in ≥1 domains). Prevalence of patients with domain z-scores of ≤−1.5 and ≤−2.0 varied from 3.0%–46.2% and 0.5%–25.1% respectively (figure 1). The most affected domain was learning and memory (visuospatial and memory) in 92 (46.2%) patients based on z≤−1.5 on ≥2 subtests and 50 (25.1%) patients based on z≤−2.0 in ≥1 subtest. Conclusion Prevalence of CI using our CB ranged between 37.7%–49.8% (z≤−1.5 in≥2 domains and z≤−2.0 in≥1 domains respectively), which was higher than the pooled prevalence from previous reports of 38%. These differences in CI prevalence across studies could be attributed to different factors including the heterogeneity in patients’ demographics/comorbidities, sample size, the use of different metrics to determine CI, and the lack of a standardized definition of CI. Further studies are required to identify the best definition for CI and its metrics. Acknowledgment This project is funded by the Arthritis Society and the Physicians’ Services Incorporated Foundation.

IntroductionExposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is a significant risk factor for physical and mental illnesses later in life. Concussion or traumatic brain injury is a challenging condition where preinjury factors may interact to affect recovery. The association between ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussion is not well mapped in any previous reviews of the literature. Using a scoping review methodology, the research question that will be addressed is: what is known from the existing literature about the association between ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussion in adults?Methods and analysisThe methodological frameworks outlined by Arksey and O’Malley and Levacet alwill be used. All original studies in English published since 2007 investigating ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussion outcomes will be included with no limitations on study type. Literature search strategies will be developed using medical subject headings and text words related to ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussions. Multiple electronic databases will be searched. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts for full-text review and full texts for final inclusion. Two independent reviewers will extract data on study characteristics for ACE exposure and traumatic brain injury/concussion outcomes. Extracted data will be summarised quantitatively using numerical counts and qualitatively using thematic analysis.DisseminationThis review will identify knowledge gaps on the associations between ACEs and traumatic brain injury/concussion and promote further research. Knowledge translation will occur throughout the review process with dissemination of project findings to stakeholders at the local, national and international levels.

Ruttan L, Martin K, Liu A, Colella B, Green RE. Long-term cognitive outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis examining timed and untimed tests at 1 and 4.5 or more years after injury. Objectives To examine long-term outcome of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on timed and untimed cognitive tests using meta-analysis. Design Meta-analysis examining outcome at 2 epochs, 6 to 18 months postinjury (epoch 1) and 4.5 to 11 years postinjury (epoch 2). Setting Data source was published articles (1966–2007) identified through electronic and manual search. Participants A total of 1380 subjects with moderate to severe TBI participated in the 16 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Timed and untimed neuropsychologic tests with quantitative results (means, SDs, t , and df tests) from studies containing a healthy comparison group and a mean time since injury falling within 1 of the 2 epochs. Results Patient versus control weighted effect sizes were medium to large at epoch 1 for both untimed tasks ( r =−.46; confidence interval [CI], −.32 to −.65) and timed tasks ( r =−.46; CI, −.35 to −.59). At epoch 2, effect sizes were slightly smaller for untimed tasks ( r =−.38; CI, −.25 to −.60) and timed tasks ( r =−.40; CI, −.32 to −.62). Conclusions Patients showed robust, persisting impairments on both timed and untimed tests at recovery plateau (ie, 6–18mo postinjury) and many years later. These findings converge with previous studies, though using an alternative approach that obviates some of the methodologic problems of longitudinal studies, such as selective attrition.

The current investigation sought to further establish the psychometric properties and ecological validity of the Multitasking in the City Test (MCT) in a clinical population. Ecological validity was addressed via correlational analyses between performance on this test and a subjective measure of everyday executive functioning (Frontal Systems Behavior Scale; FrSBe). The sample was composed of 13 individuals (11 males) who suffered a stroke or traumatic brain injury. A neuropsychological test battery consisting of the MCT and common executive and nonexecutive measures was administered. The only executive function tests that were significantly related to the FrSBe were the MCT and a semantic fluency test. Compared with a sample of normal participants, the patient group produced better plans but completed fewer tasks on the MCT. Patients made similar types of errors as normals, although some of these errors occurred more frequently in the patient sample. This study demonstrated the ecological validity of the MCT and suggested that patients can be differentiated from healthy individuals by quantitative (i.e., number of errors) rather than qualitative (i.e., type of errors) aspects of performance. Further interpretation of MCT performance and comparison with existing executive function tests is discussed.

OBJECTIVES To examine whether 6-month posttreatment acquired brain injury (ABI) patients receiving cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) adapted for ABI would demonstrate (1) maintenance of psychological benefits, (2) better community integration, and (3) commensurate benefits for both teletherapy and face-to-face group therapy. A secondary objective was to examine the relationship between coping strategies and mood and community integration. PARTICIPANTS Seventeen chronic ABI patients with elevated psychological distress. OUTCOME MEASURES Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), Community Integration Questionnaire, and the Ways of Coping questionnaire, revised. PROCEDURES Eleven CBT sessions provided either in a face-to-face group format or individually by telephone with outcomes measured pretreatment, posttreatment, and at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS At 6-month follow-up, full-group scores were significantly better than pretreatment for psychological distress (t(16) = 6.22, P < .01, SCL-90-R; t(16) = 7.32, P < .01, DASS-21) and for community integration (t(16) = -6.15, P < .01), with negligible decrements from immediately posttreatment. Subgroup scores were comparable. Coping also improved but was uncorrelated with mood or community integration. CONCLUSION The CBT adapted for ABI shows enduring benefits for mood and community integration. The efficacy of teletherapy obviates service access problems related to geographical remoteness and mobility restrictions. A larger, randomized, control trial that examines underlying mechanisms of efficacy is needed.

The relationship between depression and performance on selected neurocognitive tests was examined in two mild head injury samples (n 1 =72, n 2 =50). A series of hierarchical regression analyses showed that scores on depression-related scales of both the MCMI-II (Millon Clinical Multi-Axial Inventory; Millon, 1987) and MMPI-2 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; Hathaway & McKinley, 1989) were largely independent of cognitive performance. Depression may be prevalent in mild injury, but it is unlikely to mediate deficits observed on commonly used measures of problem solving, visual-motor speed, prose and figural recall.