Search

Background and Aims: Cleanliness of the mucosa of the upper GI (UGI) tract is critical for performing a high-quality EGD. The aim of this study was to validate a recently developed UGI cleanliness scale (the Polprep: Effective Assessment of Cleanliness in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy [PEACE] system) in the detection of clinically significant lesions (CSLs) in the UGI tract., Methods: Patients who underwent a complete diagnostic EGD were prospectively enrolled from August 2021 to October 2022. The UGI tract (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) cleanliness was scored from 0 to 3 for each segment. The primary outcomes were the detection of CSLs and PEACE scores., Results: Of 995 patients enrolled from 5 centers, adequate cleanliness (AQ; all scores ≥2) was found in 929 patients. In multivariate regression analysis, AQ was associated with the number of diagnosed CSLs (odds ratio [OR], 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.01; P = .03). Other factors related to CSL detection were duration of EGD (OR, 1.29, 95% CI, 1.23-1.35, P < .001), male sex (OR, 1.33, 95% CI, 1.04-1.71; P = .025), and EGD indication (dyspepsia, alarm symptoms, gastritis surveillance, other indications vs GERD) (OR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.31-0.6, P < .001], OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.28-0.67, P < .001], OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25-0.76; P = .004], and OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.31-0.62; P < .001], respectively). Twenty-seven patients were diagnosed with UGI neoplasia, all in patients with adequate cleanliness of the UGI tract., Conclusions: Adequate cleanliness of the UGI tract as assessed with the PEACE system was associated with a significantly higher detection rate of CSLs during EGD. The relationship of this scale with UGI neoplasia detection warrants further investigation., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: P. Sharma: consultant for Boston Scientific, Olympus, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Cipla, Medtronic, Takeda, Samsung Bioepis, and CDx; grant support from ERBE and Fujifilm. M. F. Kamiński: consultant for Olympus and Erbe; speaker for Boston Scientific, Ipsen, and Recordati; grant support from Olympus. All of the other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cervical inlet patches (CIP) are common endoscopic findings with uncertain pathogenesis and clinical significance. We aimed to perform a systematic review and prospective study of clinical data and endoscopic findings related to CIP. It was a prospective single-center study conducted between 10/01/2017 and 9/01/2018. Forty patients with histopathologically confirmed CIP were compared with 222 individuals in the reference group. The systematic review was executed in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. Alcohol consumption tended to be higher among patients with CIP (3.0 ± 4.6 vs. 1.9 ± 5.0 standard drinks/week CIP patients and reference group, respectively; p < 0.001). Dysphagia was more frequent among patients with CIP (25% vs. 1.4%, CIP patients and reference group, respectively; p < 0.001), and sore throat and hoarseness were less frequent in patients with CIP (17.5% vs. 26.6% CIP patients and reference group, respectively; p < 0.01). In the multivariate regression analysis, the only risk factor of CIP occurrence was dysphagia (OR 21.9, 95%CI 4.9-98.6; p < 0.001). Sore throat and hoarseness were a reverse-risk factor of CIP diagnosis (OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.1-0.93; p = 0.04). Clinical data and coexisting endoscopic findings were not related to CIP. In the presented study, dysphagia was related to CIP occurrence, and sore throat and hoarseness tended to be less frequent among patients with CIP., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Various measures of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) quality have been proposed so far and the examination time was one of the first. The aim of the study was to compare the procedure time with novel novel quality measures - composite detection rate (CDR) and endoscopist biopsy rate (EBR)., Methods: It was prospective observational study. A total of 880 diagnostic EGDs conducted from 01.2019 to 07.2019 have been enrolled in the study., Results: Median EGD time was 4.2 min. Procedures of longer duration were marked with higher CDR (26.3% vs. 11.8%; P < 0.0001), higher EBR (44.9% vs. 12.3%; P < 0.0001), and better upper gastrointestinal neoplasm (UGN) detection (1.8% vs. 0%; P = 0.004) in comparison with procedures of shorter duration. The procedures were divided into 4 groups based on the time quartiles (group 1 <3.3 min; group 2 3.3-4.2 min; group 3 4.2-5.3 min; group 4 >5.3 min). The odds ratios of groups 2, 3, and 4 for biopsy rate were 2.42 (95% CI, 1.33-4.55), 4.33 (95% CI, 2.46-7.94), and 5.51 (95% CI, 3.18-10.03), respectively, in comparison with group 1. The odds ratios of groups 2, 3, and 4 for CDR were 3.18 (95% CI, 2.03-4.97), 5.46 (95% CI, 3.51-8.50), and 23.44 (95% CI, 14.3-38.4), respectively, in comparison with group 1., Conclusions: The procedure time is related to novel metrics - CDR and EBR. It is also related to UGN. Based on our findings it could be concluded that EGD should not last less than 4.2 min., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus (cervical inlet patches - CIP) may be easily missed during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) due to low awareness of this usually, but not invariably, benign lesion. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) emphasizes contrast between normal esophageal mucosa and CIP. The purpose of this study was to investigate how NBI use and enhanced attention of operator during inspection of upper esophagus impacts cervical inlet patch detection rate (CIPDR)., Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, randomized study in which we enrolled 1000 patients, qualified for diagnostic EGD. The trial was divided into two parts; the first, when 6 operators performed EGD with standard attention (SA), and the second, when the same operators were asked to step up with attention at CIP (enhanced attention - EA). In both parts of the study, patients were randomized to NBI and white light endoscopy (WLE) in 1:1 ratio. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT03015571)., Results: Differences in CIPDR between WLE and NBI in SA and EA were not statistically different (5.6% vs 7.6%; p ​= ​0.3, and 7.6% vs 11.6%; p ​= ​0.1, respectively). In multivariate regression analysis, the only factors improving CIPDR were NBI with EA (NBI EA , OR 3.31; 95%CI 1.57-6.98; p ​= ​0.003) and sedation (OR 1.97; 95%CI 1.27-3.05; p ​= ​0.002)., Conclusions: The use of NBI combined with EA significantly improves CIPDR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article., (Copyright © 2021 Medical University of Bialystok. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is the most frequent infection in patients with cirrhosis causing significant mortality which requires rapid recognition for effective antibiotic therapy, whereas ascitic fluid cultures are frequently negative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SBP diagnostic efficacy of procalcitonin (PCT) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta (MIP-1β) measured in serum and peritoneal fluid., Material/methods: Thirty-two participants with liver cirrhosis and ascites were included into the study (11 females and 21 males, mean age 49.5 ± 11.9 years). The peritoneal fluid and venous blood were collected for routine laboratory examinations and measurements of PCT and MIP-1β. Patients were divided into two groups according to the ascitic absolute polymorphonuclear leukocytes count (≥250 mm(-3) and <250 mm(-3))., Results: Ascites was sterile in 22 participants and SBP was diagnosed in 10 patients. Serum and ascitic levels of PCT and MIP-1β did not correlate with clinical and routine laboratory parameters. MIP-1β in the ascitic fluid was significantly higher in patients with SBP (213 ± 279 pg/ml vs. 66.3 ± 49.8 pg/ml; p=0.01). The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of SBP with ascitic MIP-1β were 80% and 72.7%, respectively (cut-off value 69.4 pg/ml) with AUROC 0.77 (95%CI 0.58-0.96). Serum levels of MIP-1β showed lower diagnostic yield. Serum and ascitic PCT levels were not different in patients with and without SBP., Conclusions: MIP-1β concentration in ascitic fluid may distinguish patients with and without SBP with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. Chemokines should be further explored for diagnostic use., (Copyright © 2014 Medical University of Bialystok. Published by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.)