Search

Your search keyword '"Leon-Garcia, Montserrat"' showing total 11 results
Start Over Author "Leon-Garcia, Montserrat"
11 results on '"Leon-Garcia, Montserrat"'

5. Self-management interventions for adults living with obesity to improve patient-relevant outcomes: An evidence map

Author

Sunol, Rosa, González-González, Ana Isabel, Valli, Claudia, Ballester, Marta, Seils, Laura, Heijmans, Monique, Poortvliet, Rune, van der Gaag, Marieke, Rocha, Claudio, León-García, Montserrat, Salas-Gama, Karla, de Guzman, Ena Niño, Kaloteraki, Chrysoula, Santero, Marilina, Spoiala, Cristina, Gurung, Pema, Moaddine, Saida, Wilemen, Fabienne, Cools, Iza, Bleeker, Julia, Kancheva, Angelina, Ertl, Julia, Laure, Tajda, Kancheva, Ivana, Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Zevgiti, Stella, Beltrán, Jessica, Canelo-Aybar, Carlos, Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae, Seitidis, Georgios, Mavridis, Dimitris, Groene, Oliver, Alonso-Coello, Pablo, and Orrego, Carola

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Comparing Methods for Identifying Post-Market Patient Preferences at the Point of Decision-Making: Insights from Patients with Chronic Pain Considering a Spinal Cord Stimulator Device.

Author

Golembiewski, Elizabeth H, Leon-Garcia, Montserrat, Gravholt, Derek Loy, Brito, Juan P, Spatz, Erica S, Bendel, Markus A, Montori, Victor M, Maraboto, Andrea P, Hartasanchez, Sandra A, and Hargraves, Ian G

Subjects
*PATIENT preferences, *SPINAL cord, *CHRONIC pain, *VIDEO coding, *ACADEMIC medical centers
Abstract

Purpose: To compare three methods for identifying patient preferences (MIPPs) at the point of decision-making: analysis of video-recorded patient-clinician encounters, post-encounter interviews, and post-encounter surveys. Patients and Methods: For the decision of whether to use a spinal cord stimulator device (SCS), a video coding scheme, interview guide, and patient survey were iteratively developed with 30 SCS decision-making encounters in a tertiary academic medical center pain clinic. Burke's grammar of motives was used to classify the attributed source or justification for a potential preference for each preference block. To compare the MIPPs, 13 patients' encounters with their clinician were video recorded and subsequently analyzed by 4 coders using the final video coding scheme. Six of these patients were interviewed, and 7 surveyed, immediately following their encounters. Results: For videos, an average of 66 (range 33– 106) sets of utterances potentially indicating a patient preference (a preference block), surveys 33 (range 32– 34), and interviews 25 (range 18– 30) were identified. Thirty-eight unique themes (75 subthemes), each a preference topic, were identified from videos, surveys 19 themes (12 subthemes), and interviews 39 themes (54 subthemes). The proportion of preference blocks that were judged as expressing a preference that was clearly important to the patient or affected their decision was highest for interviews (72.8%), surveys (68.0%), and videos (27.0%). Videos mostly attributed preferences to the patient's situation (scene) (65%); interviews, the act of receiving or living with SCS (43%); surveys, the purpose of SCS (40%). Conclusion: MIPPs vary in the type of preferences identified and the clarity of expressed preferences in their data sets. The choice of which MIPP to use depends on projects' goals and resources, recognizing that the choice of MIPP may affect which preferences are found. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results