Search

Background: Ustekinumab is approved for ulcerative colitis (UC)., Aims: To assess the durability of ustekinumab in patients with UC and its short-term effectiveness, durability and tolerability in clinical practice., Methods: Retrospective, multicentre study of patients who had received their first ustekinumab dose at least 16 weeks before inclusion. Patients were followed until treatment discontinuation or last visit. Only patients with active disease at the start of ustekinumab treatment were considered in the effectiveness analysis. Patients who stopped ustekinumab before their last visit were considered not to be in subsequent remission., Results: We included 620 patients; 155 (25%) discontinued ustekinumab during follow-up (median 12 months). Rate of discontinuation was 20% per patient-year of follow-up. Anaemia at baseline (hazard ratio, HR 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.1), steroids at baseline (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.06-2.08) and more severe clinical activity at baseline (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.09-2.06) were associated with higher risk of discontinuation. At the end of induction, 226 (40%) patients were in steroid-free clinical remission. Moderate-severe vs mild disease activity at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5), male sex (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.8), and increased number of previous biologics (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) were associated with lower likelihood of steroid-free clinical remission at week 16. One hundred and seventy-six patients (28%) had at least one adverse event. We observed no negative impact of ustekinumab on extraintestinal manifestations and/or immune-mediated diseases., Conclusions: Ustekinumab durability in UC was relatively high, and treatment was effective in highly refractory patients. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Aims: Inflammatory pouch disorders exhibit a heterogeneous clinical spectrum and therapeutic requirements have not been properly studied., Methods: This retrospective, multicentre study included ulcerative colitis patients with ileal pouch construction and were later diagnosed with an inflammatory pouch disorder between 1995 and 2020. Classifications, behaviour and therapies applied were recorded and compared in the long-term., Results: Overall, 338 patients were recruited. The most common disorders were pouchitis (n = 258, 76%), Crohn's disease of the pouch (n = 55, 16%) and cuffitis (n = 25, 7%). Pouchitis presented mainly as chronic (65.2%) and recurrent (87%) forms. Crohn's disease manifested as stricturing/penetrating in 53% of cases and perianal disease in 42%. Patients received multiple therapies: 86% antibiotics, 42% steroids, 27% immunosuppressants, 43% biologics and 27% surgery. Compared with pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch was characterised by a later diagnosis (99 vs. 55 months, p < 0.001) and greater needs for immunosuppressants (OR 3.53, 1.79-6.94, p < 0.0001), biologics (OR 5.45, 2.78-10.6, p < 0.0001) and surgeries (OR 2.65, 1.43-4.89, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Chronic pouchitis is the most common pouch disorder presentation. These entities have diverse therapeutics requirements, particularly for Crohn's disease of the pouch., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest F. Mesonero has served as a speaker for and received consulting fees from MSD, AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kern Pharma, Dr. Falk Pharma, Galapagos, Chiesi Farmaceutici and Faes Farma. - Y. Zabana has received support for conference attendance, speaker fees, research support and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adacyte Therapeutics, Almirall, Amgen, Dr. Falk Pharma, Faes Farma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, MSD, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, Galapagos, Boehringer Ingelheim and Tillotts Pharma AG. - A. Fernández-Clotet has served as a speaker for and received educational funding from Dr. Falk Pharma, Janssen, Takeda, Chiesi Farmaceutici and Pfizer. - B. Caballol has served as a speaker for and received consulting fees from MSD, AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Shire Pharmaceuticals and Faes Pharma. - E. Leo-Carnerero has served as a speaker and consultant for and received educational funding from AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Pfizer and Dr. Falk Pharma. - M. J. García has received financial support for travel and educational activities from Janssen, Pfizer, AbbVie, Takeda, Kern Pharma, Faes Farma and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. - R. Ferreiro-Iglesias has received support for conference attendance, speaker fees, research support and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adacyte Therapeutics, Dr. Falk Pharma, Faes Farma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, MSD, Kern, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Gebro Pharma, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma AG. - M. Calafat has received support for conference attendance, speaker fees, research support and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adacyte Therapeutics, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Gilead, Chiesi Farmaceutici and Tillotts Pharma AG. - J. Miranda has received support for conference attendance, speaker fees and consulting and advisory fees from AbbVie, Adacyte Therapeutics, Dr. Falk Pharma, Faes Farma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma AG. - L. Torrealba has served as a speaker for and received educational funding from AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Pfizer, Dr. Falk Pharma and Tillotts Pharma AG. - R. Sáiz-Chumillas has served as a speaker for and received consulting fees from Janssen, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Faes Farma. - A. López has received support for conference attendance, educational funding and speaker fees from Chiesi Farmaceutici, AbbVie, Janssen, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Pfizer and Tillotts Pharma AG. - C. Rubín de Célix has received educational funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Tillotts Pharma AG, AbbVie, Norgine, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda and Janssen and is supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Río Hortega CM21/00025) and co-financed by the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) ‘Co-financed by the European Union’. - E. Brunet has served as a speaker and consultant for and received educational funding from Janssen, Takeda, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kern Pharma, AbbVie and Chiesi Farmaceutici. - A. Hernández has served as a speaker for and received educational funding from AbbVie, Takeda, Kern Pharma, Pfizer, Janssen, Adacyte Therapeutics, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Galapagos and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. - I. González-Partida has received support for conference attendance and speaker fees from AbbVie, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, MSD, Kern, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma AG. - I. Rodríguez-Lago has received financial support for travel and educational activities from or has served as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Adacyte Therapeutics, Celltrion, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Danone, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Faes Farma, Janssen, Galapagos, MSD, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma. I. R.-L. has also received financial support for research from Tillotts Pharma AG and is supported by research grants from Gobierno Vasco – Eusko Jaurlaritza (grant no. 2020111061) and Biobizkaia HRI (grant no. BCB/I/LIB/22/008). - M. C. Rodríguez-Grau has served as a speaker for Takeda, Shire Pharmaceutics and Dr. Falk Pharma and has received education funding from Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen, MSD, Dr. Falk Pharma, Shire Pharmaceutics, Mylan, Norgine, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Faes Farma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and AbbVie. - A. Elosua has served as a speaker for or has received educational funding from AbbVie, Adacyte Therapeutics, Takeda, Faes Farma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen and Tillotts Pharma AG. - J. Huguet has received fees for educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings and advisory boards sponsored by MSD, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Janssen, Biogen, Sandoz, Kern Pharma, Faes Farma and Takeda. - M. Barreiro de Acosta has served as a speaker, consultant and advisory member for and has received research funding from MSD, AbbVie, Janssen, Kern Pharma, Celltrion, Takeda, Gilead, Galapagos, BMS, Celgene, Pfizer, Sandoz, Biogen, Fresenius, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Faes Farma, Dr. Falk Pharma, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Gebro Pharma, Adacyte Therapeutics and Vifor Pharma. Remaining authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) has shown to be safe and effective in ulcerative colitis (UC), also in combination with biologics, mainly with anti-TNF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab (UST) in patients with UC., Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 12 IBD Units, including all patients with refractory UC or unclassified IBD (IBD-U) who received combined GMA plus UST. The number and frequency of GMA sessions, filtered blood volume and time of each session were registered. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis., Results: Seventeen patients were included (15 UC, 2 IBD-U; median age 47 years [IQR, 35-61]; 59% male; 53% E3). Most patients (89%) had prior exposure to anti-TNF agents and 53% to vedolizumab; 65% were also receiving steroids at baseline. Median partial Mayo score at baseline was 6 (IQR, 5-7) and it significantly decreased after 1 and 6 months (p=0.042 and 0.007, respectively). Baseline FC significantly decreased after 6 months (p=0.028) while no differences were found in CRP. During follow-up, 18% patients started a new biologic therapy and 12% required surgery; 64% of patients under steroids were able to discontinue them. Adverse events were reported in one patient., Conclusion: GMA can recapture the response to UST in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: The usefulness of thiopurines has been poorly explored in pouchitis and other pouch disorders., Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine as maintenance therapy in inflammatory pouch disorders., Design: This was a retrospective and multicentre study., Methods: We included patients diagnosed with inflammatory pouch disorders treated with azathioprine in monotherapy. Effectiveness was evaluated at 1 year and in the long term based on normalization of stool frequency, absence of pain, faecal urgency or fistula discharge (clinical remission), or any improvement in these symptoms (clinical response). Endoscopic response was evaluated using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI)., Results: In all, 63 patients were included [54% males; median age, 49 (28-77) years]. The therapy was used to treat pouchitis ( n  = 37) or Crohn's disease of the pouch ( n  = 26). The rate of clinical response, remission and non-response at 12 months were 52%, 30% and 18%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range 11-55), 19 patients (30%) were in clinical remission, and 45 (66%) stopped therapy. Endoscopic changes were evaluated in 19 cases. PDAI score decreased from 3 (range 2-4) to 1 (range 0-3). In all, 21 patients (33%) presented adverse events and 16 (25%) needed to stop therapy., Conclusion: Azathioprine may be effective in the long term for the treatment of inflammatory pouch disorders and could be included as a therapeutic option., Competing Interests: Francisco Mesonero has served as a speaker for and received consulting fees from MSD, AbbVie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Ferring, Kern-Pharma, Dr. Falk Pharma, Galapagos, Chiesi and Faes Farma. Yamile Zabana has received support for conference attendance, speaker fees, research support and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adacyte, Almirall, Amgen, Dr. Falk Pharma, FAES Pharma, Ferring, Janssen, MSD, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, Galapagos, Boehringer Ingelheim and Tillots. Agnés Fernández-Clotet has served as a speaker for and received educational funding from Dr. Falk Pharma, Janssen, Takeda, Chiesi and Pfizer. Eduardo Leo-Carnerero has served as a speaker and consultant for and received educational funding from AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring, Gilead, Pfizer and Dr. Falk Pharma. Andrea Núñez-Ortiz has received educational funding from Janssen, Takeda, Ferring and Pfizer. Berta Caballol has served as a speaker for and received consulting fees from MSD, AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring, Shire Pharmaceuticals and Faes Pharma. Rocío Ferreiro-Iglesias has received support for conference attendance, speaker fees, research support and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adacyte, Dr. Falk Pharma, FAES Pharma, Ferring, Janssen, MSD, Kern, Chiesi, Gebro Pharma, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda and Tillots. José Miranda-Bautista has received support for conference attendance, speaker fees, and consulting and advisory fees from AbbVie, Adacyte, Dr. Falk Pharma, FAES Pharma, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda and Tillots. Leyanira Torrealba has served as a speaker for and received educational funding from AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring, Gilead, Pfizer, Dr. Falk Pharma and Tillotts Pharma. Rosa María Sáiz-Chumillas has served as a speaker for and received consulting fees from Janssen, Ferring and Faes Farma. Alicia López-García has received support for conference attendance, educational funding and speaker fees from Chiesi, AbbVie, Janssen, Ferring, Takeda, Pfizer and Tillots. Cristina Rubín de Célix has received educational funding from Ferring, Tillotts Pharma, AbbVie, Norgine, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda and Janssen and is supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Rio Hortega CM21/00025) and co-financed by the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) ‘Co-financed by the European Union’. Eduard Brunet has served as a speaker and consultant for and received educational funding from Janssen, Takeda, Ferring, Kern-Pharma, AbbVie and Chiesi. Alejandro Hernández-Camba has served as a speaker for and received educational funding from AbbVie, Takeda, Kern Pharma, Pfizer, Janssen, Adacyte Therapeutics, Chiesi, Galapagus and Ferring. Iago Rodríguez-Lago has received financial support for travelling and educational activities from or has served as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Adacyte, Celltrion, Chiesi, Danone, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring, Faes Farma, Janssen, Galapagos, MSD, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma. Iago Rodríguez-Lago has also received financial support for research from Tillotts Pharma and is supported by a research grant from Gobierno Vasco – Eusko Jaurlaritza [Grant No. 2020222004]. Alfonso Elosua has served as a speaker for and has received educational funding from AbbVie, Adacyte, Takeda, FAES Farma, Ferring, Janssen and Tillots Pharma. José María Huguet has received fees for educational activities, research projects, scientific meetings and advisory boards sponsored by MSD, Ferring, AbbVie, Janssen, Biogen, Sandoz, Kern Pharma, Faes Farma and Takeda. Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta has served as a speaker, consultant and advisory member for and has received research funding from MSD, AbbVie, Janssen, Kern Pharma, Celltrion, Takeda, Gilead, Celgene, Pfizer, Sandoz, Biogen, Fresenius, Ferring, Faes Farma, Dr. Falk Pharma, Chiesi, Gebro Pharma, Adacyte and Vifor Pharma., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

(1) Background: Transition is a planned movement of paediatric patients to adult healthcare systems, and its implementation is not yet established in all inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) units. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of transition on IBD outcomes. (2) Methods: Multicentre, retrospective and observational study of IBD paediatric patients transferred to an adult IBD unit between 2017-2020. Two groups were compared: transition (≥1 joint visit involving the gastroenterologist, the paediatrician, a programme coordinator, the parents and the patient) and no-transition. Outcomes within one year after transfer were analysed. The main variable was poor clinical outcome (IBD flare, hospitalisation, surgery or any change in the treatment because of a flare). Predictive factors of poor clinical outcome were identified with multivariable analysis. (3) Results: A total of 278 patients from 34 Spanish hospitals were included. One hundred eighty-five patients (67%) from twenty-two hospitals (65%) performed a structured transition. Eighty-nine patients had poor clinical outcome at one year after transfer: 27% in the transition and 43% in the no-transition group ( p = 0.005). One year after transfer, no-transition patients were more likely to have a flare (36% vs. 22%; p = 0.018) and reported more hospitalisations (10% vs. 3%; p = 0.025). The lack of transition, as well as parameters at transfer, including IBD activity, body mass index < 18.5 and corticosteroid treatment, were associated with poor clinical outcome. One patient in the transition group (0.4%) was lost to follow-up. (4) Conclusion: Transition care programmes improve patients' outcomes after the transfer from paediatric to adult IBD units. Active IBD at transfer impairs outcomes.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the durability, short-term and long-term effectiveness, and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice., Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study including patients with UC who had received the first tofacitinib dose at least 8 weeks before the inclusion. Clinical effectiveness was based on partial Mayo score., Results: A total of 408 patients were included. Of them, 184 (45%) withdrew tofacitinib during follow-up (mean = 18 months). The probability of maintaining tofacitinib was 67% at 6 m, 58% at 12 m, and 49% at 24 m. The main reason for tofacitinib withdrawal was primary nonresponse (44%). Older age at the start of tofacitinib and a higher severity of clinical activity were associated with tofacitinib withdrawal. The proportion of patients in remission was 38% at week 4, 45% at week 8, and 47% at week 16. Having moderate-to-severe vs mild disease activity at baseline and older age at tofacitinib start were associated with a lower and higher likelihood of remission at week 8, respectively. Of 171 patients in remission at week 8, 83 (49%) relapsed. The probability of maintaining response was 66% at 6 m and 54% at 12 m. There were 93 adverse events related to tofacitinib treatment (including 2 pulmonary thromboembolisms [in patients with risk factors] and 2 peripheral vascular thrombosis), and 29 led to tofacitinib discontinuation., Discussion: Tofacitinib is effective in both short-term and long-term in patients with UC. The safety profile is similar to that previously reported., (Copyright © 2023 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background and Aims: Data on the outcomes after switching from adalimumab (ADA) originator to ADA biosimilar are limited. The aim was to compare the treatment persistence, clinical efficacy, and safety outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients who maintained ADA originator vs. those who switched to ADA biosimilar., Methods: Patients receiving ADA originator who were in clinical remission at standard dose of ADA originator were included. Patients who maintained ADA originator formed the non-switch cohort (NSC), and those who switched to different ADA biosimilars constituted the switch cohort (SC). Clinical remission was defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw index ≤4 in Crohn's disease and a partial Mayo score ≤2 in ulcerative colitis. To control possible confounding effects on treatment discontinuation, an inverse probability treatment weighted proportional hazard Cox regression was performed., Results: Five hundred and twenty-four patients were included: 211 in the SC and 313 in the NSC. The median follow-up was 13 months in the SC and 24 months in the NSC (p < 0.001). The incidence rate of ADA discontinuation was 8% and 7% per patient-year in the SC and in the NSC, respectively (p > 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, switching from ADA originator to ADA biosimilar was not associated with therapy discontinuation. The incidence rate of relapse was 8% per patient-year in the SC and 6% per patient-year in the NSC (p > 0.05). Six percent of the patients had adverse events in the SC vs. 5% in the NSC (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: Switching to ADA biosimilar did not impair patients' outcomes in comparison with maintaining on the originator., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Idiopathic achalasia is a chronic oesophageal motility disorder caused by loss of inhibitory neurons at the esophageal myenteric plexus resulting in incomplete relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter and abnormal peristaltism.  Among the possible causes of this, an immune response secondary to infection by some viruses has been implicated. SARS-CoV-2 could be considered among them. The therapy option should be aimed at achieving the greatest clinical effectiveness according to each patient's health status.

Objective: to investigate the prevalence of perianal disease, the associated phenotypical factors, its influence on prognosis and its impact on the use of health resources for patients with Crohn's disease., Methods: a unicentric retrospective observational study was performed with 430 patients with Crohn's disease tracked through a monographical consultation of intestinal inflammatory disease. Demographic and phenotypical data of Crohn's disease, pharmacological and surgical treatments, complementary tests carried out and hospital admissions were analyzed. A comparative study between those patients without perianal disease and those with perianal disease was performed, both in simple form and complex form., Results: the prevalence of perianal disease was 40.2 %, and fistulas and abscesses were the most frequent manifestations. These appearances were associated with an affected rectum and the existence of extra-intestinal manifestations. The patients with perianal disease most frequently required immuno-suppressant and biological treatment, but no further abdominal surgery. Amongst the patients with perianal disease, the need for biologics was more frequent for luminal disease (42.8 % vs 30.7 %). Furthermore, more explorations were needed, aimed at the study of perianal disease and recto-colonoscopies, although more magnetic resonance (MR)/computed tomography (CT) enterographies were not required., Conclusions: perianal disease has a high prevalence among patients with Crohn's disease, especially when the rectum is affected. It is associated with a worse prognosis and more frequently requires biological treatments due to perianal and luminal evolution, especially in cases of complex perianal disease. This condition calls for more hospital admissions and complementary tests.

Background: ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukins IL-12 and IL-23, and is approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and, more recently, also ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab, as well as to identify possible predictive factors of response in a real-life setting., Methods: an observational, retrospective, multicenter study was carried out in 4 hospitals in Andalusia. Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CD treated with ustekinumab from 2017 to 2019 were included. Clinical response was analyzed at 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. Clinical disease activity was assessed with the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) and the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI); biochemical response was assessed with lab parameters such as CRP and ESR. One-year ustekinumab drug-survival was analyzed., Results: a total of 98 patients were analyzed (mean age, 43 years; 52 % were male); 56 % had failed with ≥ 2 previous biologicals therapies. At 3 months, 69 % of the patients were in response and 40.8 % in remission. At 6 months, 56 % were in clinical remission. At 12 months, 73.7 % were in clinical response and 60.5 % in remission. Corticosteroid-free remission was 32.4 %, 44 %, and 47.4 % at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Cumulative survival after one year of treatment with ustekinumab was 85.3 %. Biochemical parameters such as CRP and ESR showed a statistically significant decrease between baseline and control levels at 3, 6, and 12 months. A lower HBI at baseline and female sex were predictors of corticosteroid-free clinical remission in a univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis no variables were found as predictors of corticosteroid-free clinical remission., Conclusion: ustekinumab therapy is safe and useful, inducing clinical response in more than 50 % of patients, including patients who failed with other biological therapies.

Objective: to evaluate the role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) on the intestinal mucosa in the evolution of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The risk factors for EBV infection and the frequency of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders in IBD patients were also investigated., Methods: intestinal biopsies of IBD patients with available EBV status determined by Epstein-Barr-encoding RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization were identified in the Pathology Database of our center. Clinical information, including phenotypic characteristics of IBD, previous treatments, diagnosis of lymphoma and patient outcome were reviewed in all cases., Results: fifty-six patients with IBD (28 Crohn's disease, 27 ulcerative colitis and one unclassified colitis) were included. EBV in intestinal mucosa was positive in 26 patients (46 %) and was associated to a lymphoproliferative syndrome in one case. EBV positivity was associated with severe histological activity (52 % vs 17.2 %; p 0.007), the presence of a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (50 % vs 33.3 %; p 0.03) and active steroid treatment (61.5 % vs 33.3 %; p 0.03). Multivariate analyses only found an association between EBV and lymphoplasmacytosis (p 0.001). Escalation in previous treatment was significantly more frequent in the EBER+ group (53.8 % vs 26.7 %; p 0.038). No cases developed lymphoma during follow-up., Conclusions: EBV on the intestinal mucosa is associated with a poor outcome of IBD and the need for escalation of therapy. Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate is associated with EBV infection. EBER+ patients used steroids more frequently compared with EBER- patients. No EBER+ patients developed lymphoma during follow-up.

Background: The long-term outcome of patients after antitumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) discontinuation is not well known., Aims: To assess the risk of relapse in the long-term after anti-TNF discontinuation., Methods: This was an extension of the evolution after anti-TNF discontinuation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (EVODIS) study (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis patients treated with anti-TNFs in whom these drugs were withdrawn after achieving clinical remission) based in the same cohort of patients whose outcome was updated. Clinical remission was defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw index ≤4 points in Crohn's disease, a partial Mayo score ≤2 in ulcerative colitis and the absence of fistula drainage despite gentle finger compression in perianal disease., Results: This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study. A total of 1055 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 34 months. The incidence rate of relapse was 12% per patient-year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11-14). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 50% (95% CI = 47-53): 19% at one year, 31% at 2 years, 38% at 3 years, 44% at 4 years and 48% at 5 years of follow-up. Of the 60% patients retreated with the same anti-TNF after relapse, 73% regained remission. Of the 75 patients who did not respond, 48% achieved remission with other therapies. Of the 190 patients who started other therapies after relapse, 62% achieved remission with the new treatment., Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients who discontinued the anti-TNF remained in remission. In case of relapse, retreatment with the same anti-TNF was usually effective. Approximately half of the patients who did not respond after retreatment achieved remission with other therapies., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Immunotherapy is gaining significance in the management of oncological disease. It has demonstrated high levels of efficacy, though it also has hitherto unknown side effects, such as colitis. We present the first case of immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis (nivolumab+ipilimumab) refractory to corticoids treated in our hospital.

Megacolon is a serious complication of inflammatory bowel disease that often requires a colectomy. Infliximab is a therapeutic alternative when conventional treatment fails, before resorting to surgery. Its use is currently based on the publication of isolated cases. We present a series of 12 patients with megacolon treated with infliximab, five with signs of systemic toxicity. Seventy-five percent of the patients avoided a colectomy during their acute episode after early infliximab treatment, 2.45 days after the megacolon diagnosis. There was a greater risk of surgery among patients with ulcerative colitis and toxicity criteria. Two more patients required follow-up surgery despite long-term infliximab treatment. No patient suffered significant treatment-related adverse effects or significant post-surgery complications.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) after loss of response (LOR) to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents in ulcerative colitis (UC). Materials and methods: A retrospective, multicenter study was performed in 11 inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Units. Clinical remission was defined as a partial Mayo score ≤2. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated by the partial Mayo score and the rate of anti-TNF intensification, switch, swap or colectomy. Results: Forty-seven patients with ulcerative colitis were included (mean age 35 years, mean disease duration 52 months, 66% male and 59% extensive colitis). Twenty-three subjects were receiving infliximab, eighteen adalimumab and six golimumab. GMA was combined after a primary non-response (49%) or secondary loss of response (51%) to anti-TNF therapy. We observed a significant decrease in partial Mayo score and fecal calprotectin after GMA. Fifteen patients (32%) responded to the combination therapy without anti-TNF intensification, switch, swap or colectomy. Eight patients (17%) underwent colectomy. Two patients (4%) presented adverse events related to the technique. Conclusions: Combination of GMA and anti-tumor necrosis factor is a safe and effective treatment after the loss of response to these biologic agents, with a significant decrease of the clinical disease activity and biomarkers, in a population with limited therapeutic alternatives.

Mesalazine is a drug routinely used in ulcerative colitis and usually has few side effects. There have been reports of uncommon cases of severe mucocutaneous damage, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), induced by salicylates. It is important to diagnose these promptly due to the high morbidity and mortality rates. We describe the case of a 46-year-old female with ulcerative proctitis, who developed SJS following topical mesalazine use. The lesions responded well to intravenous corticosteroids after discontinuation of the drug.

The identification of IgG4-related disease as a distinct immune-mediated condition encompassing disorders that were traditionally seen as idiopathic has been a revolution in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm in several medical fields. This condition usually involves multiple organs (isolated organ involvement is uncommon except in the pancreas) with characteristic histopathological findings. We report a case that was assessed due to abdominal pain and subsequently diagnosed with IgG4-related sclerosing mesenteritis. A comprehensive work-up of the case ruled out other conditions and a diagnosis of IgG4-related sclerosing mesenteritis was made according to radiographic and histopathological criteria.

Background: Golimumab is a TNF-blocking agent indicated as a second-line therapy in ulcerative colitis., Purpose: To research the effectiveness and safety of golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical practice., Methods: Retrospective study of the effectiveness and safety of golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis. All patients received golimumab 200 mg subcutaneously at week 0, and golimumab 100 mg subcutaneously at week 2. After the induction treatment, each patient received 50 mg sc. every 4 weeks in patients with body weight less than 80 kg, and 100 mg every 4 weeks in patients with body weight greater than or equal to 80 kg., Results: Study of a group of 23 ulcerative colitis patients, 7 of whom were naive to any anti-TNF therapy, and 16 patients who had previously been treated with an anti-TNF agent other than golimumab (non-naive patients). The average treatment time with golimumab was 14.3 weeks. Globally, withdrawal of corticosteroids was observed in 74% of cases. Clinical response was observed in 85.5% of patients who had not received biological treatment previously, and in patients who had previously received biological treatment the response rate was 75%., Conclusions: In this short study, golimumab seems to be an alternative treatment in naive and non-naive anti-TNF ulcerative colitis patients. It is also a safe therapy, given that there were no adverse effects in the patients studied.