Search

Timely and accurate identification of molecular alterations in solid tumors is essential for proper management of patients with advanced cancers. This has created a need for rapid, scalable comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) systems that detect an increasing number of therapeutically-relevant variant types and molecular signatures. In this study, we assessed the analytical performance of the TruSight Oncology 500 High-Throughput assay for detection of somatic alterations from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. In parallel, we developed supporting software and automated sample preparation systems designed to process up to 70 clinical samples in a single NovaSeq 6000TM sequencing run with a turnaround time of <7 days from specimen receipt to report. The results demonstrate that the scalable assay accurately and reproducibly detects small variants, copy number alterations, microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) from 40ng DNA, and multiple gene fusions, including known and unknown partners and splice variants from 20ng RNA. 717 tumor samples and reference materials with previously known alterations in 96 cancer-related genes were sequenced to evaluate assay performance. All variant classes were reliably detected at consistent and reportable variant allele percentages with >99% overall accuracy and precision. Our results demonstrate that the high-throughput CGP assay is a reliable method for accurate detection of molecular alterations in support of precision therapeutics in oncology. The supporting systems and scalable workflow allow for efficient interpretation and prompt reporting of hundreds of patient cancer genomes per week with excellent analytical performance., Competing Interests: The authors have the following interests. At the time of this research JC, SP, SG, RJS, EVR, SG, BB, JA, VG, MM, YHL, PD, MN, YW, FL, RK and SZ were employed by OmniSeq, Inc., the funder of this study. In addition, JC, SP, SG, PD, MN, RK and SZ were minority OmniSeq shareholders. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Background: Contemporary to the rapidly evolving landscape of cancer immunotherapy is the equally changing understanding of immune tumor microenvironments (TMEs) which is crucial to the success of these therapies. Their reliance on a robust host immune response necessitates clinical grade measurements of immune TMEs at diagnosis. In this study, we describe a stable tumor immunogenic profile describing immune TMEs in multiple tumor types with ability to predict clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)., Methods: A tumor immunogenic signature (TIGS) was derived from targeted RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and gene expression analysis of 1323 clinical solid tumor cases spanning 35 histologies using unsupervised analysis. TIGS correlation with ICI response and survival was assessed in a retrospective cohort of NSCLC, melanoma and RCC tumor blocks, alone and combined with TMB, PD-L1 IHC and cell proliferation biomarkers., Results: Unsupervised clustering of RNA-seq profiles uncovered a 161 gene signature where T cell and B cell activation, IFNg, chemokine, cytokine and interleukin pathways are over-represented. Mean expression of these genes produced three distinct TIGS score categories: strong (n = 384/1323; 29.02%), moderate (n = 354/1323; 26.76%), and weak (n = 585/1323; 44.22%). Strong TIGS tumors presented an improved ICI response rate of 37% (30/81); with highest response rate advantage occurring in NSCLC (ORR = 36.6%; 16/44; p = 0.051). Similarly, overall survival for strong TIGS tumors trended upward (median = 25 months; p = 0.19). Integrating the TIGS score categories with neoplastic influence quantified via cell proliferation showed highly proliferative and strong TIGS tumors correlate with significantly higher ICI ORR than poorly proliferative and weak TIGS tumors [14.28%; p = 0.0006]. Importantly, we noted that strong TIGS and highly [median = not achieved; p = 0.025] or moderately [median = 16.2 months; p = 0.025] proliferative tumors had significantly better survival compared to weak TIGS, highly proliferative tumors [median = 7.03 months]. Importantly, TIGS discriminates subpopulations of potential ICI responders that were considered negative for response by TMB and PD-L1., Conclusions: TIGS is a comprehensive and informative measurement of immune TME that effectively characterizes host immune response to ICIs in multiple tumors. The results indicate that when combined with PD-L1, TMB and cell proliferation, TIGS provides greater context of both immune and neoplastic influences on the TME for implementation into clinical practice.

Background: Immunotherapeutic approaches for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are less successful as compared to many other tumor types. In this study, comprehensive immune profiling was performed in order to identify novel, potentially actionable targets for immunotherapy., Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens from 68 patients were evaluated for expression of 395 immune-related markers (RNA-seq), mutational burden by complete exon sequencing of 409 genes, PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), pattern of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) infiltration by CD8 IHC, and PD-L1/L2 copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)., Results: The seven classes of actionable genes capturing myeloid immunosuppression, metabolic immunosuppression, alternative checkpoint blockade, CTLA-4 immune checkpoint, immune infiltrate, and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) axis immune checkpoint, discerned 5 unique clinically relevant immunosuppression expression profiles (from most to least common): (I) combined myeloid and metabolic immunosuppression [affecting 25 of 68 patients (36.8%)], (II) multiple immunosuppressive mechanisms (29.4%), (III) PD-L1 positive (20.6%), (IV) highly inflamed PD-L1 negative (10.3%); and (V) immune desert (2.9%). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the PDAC cohort with a comparison cohort (n=1,416 patients) for the mean expressions of the 409 genes evaluated. Multiple genes including TIM3, VISTA, CCL2, CCR2, TGFB1, CD73, and CD39 had significantly higher mean expression versus the comparison cohort, while three genes (LAG3, GITR, CD38) had significantly lower mean expression., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a clinically relevant unique profile of immune markers can be identified in PDAC and be used as a roadmap for personalized immunotherapeutic decision-making strategies., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1076). FLL, SP, PDP, MN, JC, BB, SG, and CM are all employees of OmniSeq, Inc. (Buffalo, NY) and hold restricted stock in OmniSeq, Inc. JC, SG, BK, and CM are employees of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (Buffalo, NY). Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center is the majority shareholder of OmniSeq, Inc. RK receives research funding from Incyte, Genentech, Merck, Serono, Pfizer, Sequenom, Foundation Medicine, and Guardant, as well as consultant fees from X Biotech, Loxo, NeoMed, and Actuate Therapeutics, speaker fees from Roche, and has an ownership interest in Curematch Inc. Dr. Nesline reports other from OmniSeq, Inc., outside the submitted work. Dr. Kato reports other from null, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Pabla reports other from Omniseq, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Pabla has a patent 20200048717 pending, and a patent 20180107786 pending. Dr. Kurzrock reports other from Dr. Kurzrock has the following disclosure information: Stock and Other Equity Interests. (IDbyDNA, CureMatch, Inc., and Soluventis); Consulting or Advisory Role (Gaido, LOXO, X-Biotech, Actuate Therapeutics, Roche, NeoMed, Soluventis, Pfizer, and Merck); Speaker’s fee (Roche); Research Funding (Incyte, Genentech, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Sequenom, Foundation Medicine, Guardant Health, Grifols, Konica Minolta, DeBiopharm, Boerhringer Ingelheim, and OmniSeq [All institutional]); Board Member (CureMatch, Inc., and CureMetrix, Inc.)., during the conduct of the study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Background: Biomarkers predicting immunotherapy response in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) are lacking. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is a complementary diagnostic for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in mRCC, but has shown minimal clinical utility and is not used in routine clinical practice., Methods: Tumor specimens from 56 patients with mRCC who received nivolumab were evaluated for PD-L1, cell proliferation (targeted RNA-seq), and outcome., Results: For 56 patients treated with nivolumab as a standard of care, there were 2 complete responses and 8 partial responses for a response rate of 17.9%. Dividing cell proliferation into tertiles, derived from the mean expression of 10 proliferation-associated genes in a reference set of tumors, poorly proliferative tumors (62.5%) were more common than moderately (30.4%) or highly proliferative (8.9%) counterparts. Moderately proliferative tumors were enriched for PD-L1 positive (41.2%), compared to poorly proliferative counterparts (11.4%). Objective response for moderately proliferative (29.4%) tumors was higher than that of poorly (11.4%) proliferative counterparts, but not statistically significant ( p = .11). When cell proliferation and negative PD-L1 tumor proportion scores were combined statistically significant results were achieved ( p = .048), showing that patients with poorly proliferative and PD-L1 negative tumors have a very low response rate (6.5%) compared to moderately proliferative PD-L1 negative tumors (30%)., Conclusions: Cell proliferation has value in predicting response to nivolumab in clear cell mRCC patients, especially when combined with PD-L1 expression. Further studies which include the addition of progression-free survival (PFS) along with sufficiently powered subgroups are required to further support these findings., (© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Although immunotherapies have achieved remarkable salutary effects among subgroups of advanced cancers, most patients do not respond. We comprehensively evaluated biomarkers associated with the "cancer-immunity cycle" in the pan-cancer setting in order to understand the immune landscape of metastatic malignancies as well as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor resistance mechanisms. Interrogation of 51 markers of the cancer-immunity cycle was performed in 101 patients with diverse malignancies using a clinical-grade RNA sequencing assay. Overall, the immune phenotypes demonstrated overexpression of multiple checkpoints including VISTA (15.8% of 101 patients), PD-L2 (10.9%), TIM3 (9.9%), LAG3 (8.9%), PD-L1 (6.9%) and CTLA4 (3.0%). Additionally, aberrant expression of macrophage-associated markers (e.g. CD68 and CSF1R; 11-23%), metabolic immune escape markers (e.g. ADORA2A and IDO1; 9-16%) and T-cell priming markers (e.g. CD40, GITR, ICOS and OX40; 4-31%) were observed. Most tumors (87.1%, 88/101) expressed distinct immune portfolios, with a median of six theoretically actionable biomarkers (pharmacologically tractable by Food and Drug Administration approved agents [on- or off-label] or with agents in clinical development). Overexpression of TIM-3, VISTA and CD68 were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) after anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapies (among 39 treated patients) (all P < .01). In conclusion, cancer-immunity cycle biomarker evaluation was feasible in diverse solid tumors. High expression of alternative checkpoints TIM-3 and VISTA and of the macrophage-associated markers CD68 were associated with significantly worse PFS after anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapies. Most patients had distinct and complex immune expression profiles suggesting the need for customized combinations of immunotherapy., (© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Background: We have developed and analytically validated a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to classify microsatellite instability (MSI) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens., Methodology: The assay relies on DNA-seq evaluation of insertion/deletion (indel) variability at 29 highly informative genomic loci to estimate MSI status without the requirement for matched-normal tissue. The assay has a clinically relevant five-day turnaround time and can be conducted on as little as 20 ng genomic DNA with a batch size of up to forty samples in a single run., Results: The MSI detection method was developed on a training set ( n = 94) consisting of 22 MSI-H, 24 MSS, and 47 matched normal samples and tested on an independent test set of 24 MSI-H and 24 MSS specimens. Assay performance with respect to accuracy, reproducibility, precision as well as control sample performance was estimated across a wide range of FFPE samples of multiple histologies to address pre-analytical variability (percent tumor nuclei), and analytical variability (batch size, run, day, operator). Analytical precision studies demonstrated that the assay is highly reproducible and accurate as compared to established gold standard PCR methodology and has been validated through NYS CLEP., Significance: This assay provides clinicians with robust and reproducible NGS-based MSI testing without the need of matched normal tissue to inform clinical decision making for patients with solid tumors., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST SP, JA, FLL, BB, JH, VG, MKN, YW, MG, JMC, APS, CM, and STG are employees of OmniSeq, Inc. (Buffalo, NY, USA) and hold restricted stock in OmniSeq, Inc. JMC, CM, and STG are employees of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (Buffalo, NY, USA), which is the majority shareholder of OmniSeq, Inc.

We describe the extent to which comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results were used by oncologists to guide targeted therapy selection in a cohort of solid tumor patients tested as part of standard care at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center June 2016-June 2017, with adequate follow up through September 2018 ( n = 620). Overall, 28.4% of CGP tests advised physicians about targeted therapy use supported by companion diagnostic or practice guideline evidence. Post-test targeted therapy uptake was highest for patients in active treatment at the time of order (86% versus 76% of treatment naïve patients), but also took longer to initiate (median 50 days versus 7 days for treatment naïve patients), with few patients (2.6%) receiving targeted agents prior to testing. 100% of patients with resistance variants did not receive targeted agents. Treatment naïve patients received immunotherapy as the most common alternative. When targeted therapy given off-label or in a trial was the best CGP option, (7%) of patients received it. Our data illustrate the appropriate and heterogeneous use of CGP by oncologists as a longitudinal treatment decision tool based on patient history and treatment needs, and that some patients may benefit from testing prior to initiation of other standard treatments., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Disclosures: MKN, PDP, APS, JMC, FLL, STG, MG, and CM are all employees of OmniSeq, Inc. (Buffalo, NY, USA) and hold restricted stock in OmniSeq, Inc. GKD, AE, HC, AGM, PB, MSE, IP, SE, SA, MO, GC, KO, PF, and SL are employees of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (Buffalo, NY, USA). Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center is the majority shareholder of OmniSeq, Inc. MSE provides remunerated consulting to OmniSeq, Inc.

Background: We performed profiling of the immune microenvironment of castration-resistant (CRPC) and castration-sensitive (CSPC) prostate cancer (PC) in order to identify novel targets for immunotherapy., Methods: PD-L1 and CD3/CD8 immunohistochemistry, PD-L1/2 fluorescent in situ hybridization, tumor mutation burden, microsatellite instability, and RNA-seq of 395 immune-related genes were performed in 19 CRPC and CSPC. Targeted genomic sequencing and fusion analysis were performed in 17 of these specimens., Results: CD276, PVR, and NECTIN2 were highly expressed in PC. Comparison of CRPC versus CSPC and primary versus metastatic tissue revealed the differential expression of immunostimulatory, immunosuppressive, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related genes. Unsupervised clustering of differentially expressed genes yielded two final clusters best segregated by CRPC and CSPC status., Conclusion: CD276 and the alternative checkpoint inhibition PVR/NECTIN2/CD226/TIGIT pathway emerged as relevant to PC checkpoint inhibition target development., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been linked to local immunosuppression independent of major ICI targets (e.g., PD-1). Clinical experience with response prediction based on PD-L1 expression suggests that other factors influence sensitivity to ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Methods: Tumor specimens from 120 NSCLC patients from 10 institutions were evaluated for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry, and global proliferative profile by targeted RNA-seq., Results: Cell proliferation, derived from the mean expression of 10 proliferation-associated genes (namely BUB1, CCNB2, CDK1, CDKN3, FOXM1, KIAA0101, MAD2L1, MELK, MKI67, and TOP2A), was identified as a marker of response to ICIs in NSCLC. Poorly, moderately, and highly proliferative tumors were somewhat equally represented in NSCLC, with tumors with the highest PD-L1 expression being more frequently moderately proliferative as compared to lesser levels of PD-L1 expression. Proliferation status had an impact on survival in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. There was a significant survival advantage for moderately proliferative tumors compared to their combined highly/poorly counterparts (p = 0.021). Moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors had a median survival of 14.6 months that was almost twice that of PD-L1 negative highly/poorly proliferative at 7.6 months (p = 0.028). Median survival in moderately proliferative PD-L1 negative tumors at 12.6 months was comparable to that of highly/poorly proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors at 11.5 months, but in both instances less than that of moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors. Similar to survival, proliferation status has impact on disease control (DC) in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. Patients with moderately versus those with poorly or highly proliferative tumors have a superior DC rate when combined with any classification schema used to score PD-L1 as a positive result (i.e., TPS ≥ 50% or ≥ 1%), and best displayed by a DC rate for moderately proliferative tumors of no less than 40% for any classification of PD-L1 as a negative result. While there is an over representation of moderately proliferative tumors as PD-L1 expression increases this does not account for the improved survival or higher disease control rates seen in PD-L1 negative tumors., Conclusions: Cell proliferation is potentially a new biomarker of response to ICIs in NSCLC and is applicable to PD-L1 negative tumors.

Background: PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been traditionally used for predicting clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there are at least 4 different assays and antibodies used for PD-L1 IHC, each developed with a different ICI. We set to test if next generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a robust method to determine PD-L1 mRNA expression levels and furthermore, efficacy of predicting response to ICIs as compared to routinely used, standardized IHC procedures., Methods: A total of 209 cancer patients treated on-label by FDA-approved ICIs, with evaluable responses were assessed for PD-L1 expression by RNA-seq and IHC, based on tumor proportion score (TPS) and immune cell staining (ICS). A subset of serially diluted cases was evaluated for RNA-seq assay performance across a broad range of PD-L1 expression levels., Results: Assessment of PD-L1 mRNA levels by RNA-seq demonstrated robust linearity across high and low expression ranges. PD-L1 mRNA levels assessed by RNA-seq and IHC (TPS and ICS) were highly correlated (p < 2e-16). Sub-analyses showed sustained correlation when IHC results were classified as high or low by clinically accepted cut-offs (p < 0.01), and results did not differ by tumor type or anti-PD-L1 antibody used. Overall, a combined positive PD-L1 result (≥1% IHC TPS and high PD-L1 expression by RNA-Seq) was associated with a 2-to-5-fold higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to a double negative result. Standard assessments of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) showed that a PD-L1 positive assessment for melanoma samples by RNA-seq had the lowest sensitivity (25%) but the highest PPV (72.7%). Among the three tumor types analyzed in this study, the only non-overlapping confidence interval for predicting response was for "RNA-seq low vs high" in melanoma., Conclusions: Measurement of PD-L1 mRNA expression by RNA-seq is comparable to PD-L1 expression by IHC both analytically and clinically in predicting ICI response. RNA-seq has the added advantages of being amenable to standardization and avoidance of interpretation bias. PD-L1 by RNA-seq needs to be validated in future prospective ICI clinical studies across multiple histologies.

Background: Regulatory approval of next generation sequencing (NGS) by the FDA is advancing the use of genomic-based precision medicine for the therapeutic management of cancer as standard care. Recent FDA guidance for the classification of genomic variants based on clinical evidence to aid clinicians in understanding the actionability of identified variants provided by comprehensive NGS panels has also been set forth. In this retrospective analysis, we interpreted and applied the FDA variant classification guidance to comprehensive NGS testing performed for advanced cancer patients and assessed oncologist agreement with NGS test treatment recommendations., Methods: NGS comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in a CLIA certified lab (657 completed tests for 646 patients treated at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center) between June 2016 and June 2017. Physician treatment recommendations made within 120 days post-test were gathered from tested patients' medical records and classified as targeted therapy, precision medicine clinical trial, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy/radiation, surgery, transplant, or non-therapeutic (hospice, surveillance, or palliative care). Agreement between NGS test report targeted therapy recommendations based on the FDA variant classification and physician targeted therapy treatment recommendations were evaluated., Results: Excluding variants contraindicating targeted therapy (i.e., KRAS or NRAS mutations), at least one variant with FDA level 1 companion diagnostic supporting evidence as the most actionable was identified in 14% of tests, with physicians most frequently recommending targeted therapy (48%) for patients with these results. This stands in contrast to physicians recommending targeted therapy based on test results with FDA level 2 (practice guideline) or FDA level 3 (clinical trial or off label) evidence as the most actionable result (11 and 4%, respectively)., Conclusions: We found an appropriate "dose-response" relationship between the strength of clinical evidence supporting biomarker-directed targeted therapy based on application of FDA guidance for NGS test variant classification, and subsequent treatment recommendations made by treating physicians. In view of recent changes at FDA, it is paramount to define regulatory grounds and medical policy coverage for NGS testing based on this guidance.

We report the immunological profile of a patient with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma experiencing stable disease on pembrolizumab for 20 months. The tumor exhibited extensive infiltration by CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes, low-to-moderate mutational burden, no PD-L1 staining by commercially available immunohistochemical assays, but amplification of CD274 (coding for PD-L1) and/or PDCD1LG2 (encoding PD-L2) by fluorescence in situ hybridization. RNA-seq revealed multiple biomarkers of an ongoing immune response and compensatory immune evasion, including moderate PD-L1 levels coupled with robust PD-L2 expression. Pending validation in additional patients, these findings suggest that PD-L2 expression levels may constitute a biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade in urothelial carcinoma.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the clinical management of melanoma. However, not all patients respond, and current biomarkers including PD-L1 and mutational burden show incomplete predictive performance. The clinical validity and utility of complex biomarkers have not been studied in melanoma., Methods: Cutaneous metastatic melanoma patients at eight institutions were evaluated for PD-L1 expression, CD8 + T-cell infiltration pattern, mutational burden, and 394 immune transcript expression. PD-L1 IHC and mutational burden were assessed for association with overall survival (OS) in 94 patients treated prior to ICI approval by the FDA (historical-controls), and in 137 patients treated with ICIs. Unsupervised analysis revealed distinct immune-clusters with separate response rates. This comprehensive immune profiling data were then integrated to generate a continuous Response Score (RS) based upon response criteria (RECIST v.1.1). RS was developed using a single institution training cohort (n = 48) and subsequently tested in a separate eight institution validation cohort (n = 29) to mimic a real-world clinical scenario., Results: PD-L1 positivity ≥1% correlated with response and OS in ICI-treated patients, but demonstrated limited predictive performance. High mutational burden was associated with response in ICI-treated patients, but not with OS. Comprehensive immune profiling using RS demonstrated higher sensitivity (72.2%) compared to PD-L1 IHC (34.25%) and tumor mutational burden (32.5%), but with similar specificity., Conclusions: In this study, the response score derived from comprehensive immune profiling in a limited melanoma cohort showed improved predictive performance as compared to PD-L1 IHC and tumor mutational burden.

We have developed a next-generation sequencing assay to quantify biomarkers of the host immune response in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens. This assay aims to provide clinicians with a comprehensive characterization of the immunologic tumor microenvironment as a guide for therapeutic decisions on patients with solid tumors. The assay relies on RNA-sequencing (seq) to semiquantitatively measure the levels of 43 transcripts related to anticancer immune responses and 11 transcripts that reflect the relative abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, as well as on DNA-seq to estimate mutational burden. The assay has a clinically relevant 5-day turnaround time and can be conducted on as little as 2.5 ng of RNA and 1.8 ng of genomic DNA extracted from three to five standard FFPE sections. The standardized next-generation sequencing workflow produced sequencing reads adequate for clinical testing of matched RNA and DNA from several samples in a single run. Assay performance for gene-specific sensitivity, linearity, dynamic range, and detection threshold was estimated across a wide range of actual and artificial FFPE samples selected or generated to address preanalytical variability linked to specimen features (eg, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte abundance, percentage of necrosis), and analytical variability linked to assay features (eg, batch size, run, day, operator). Analytical precision studies demonstrated that the assay is highly reproducible and accurate compared with established orthogonal approaches., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Cance is Chief Scientific Officer of FAKnostics, LLC. The other authors has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a major drug target in cancer and current inhibitors targeted to the ATP-binding pocket of the kinase domain have entered clinical trials. However, preliminary results have shown limited single-agent efficacy in patients. Despite these unfavorable data, the molecular mechanisms that drive intrinsic and acquired resistance to FAK-kinase inhibitors are largely unknown. We have demonstrated that receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) can directly bypass FAK-kinase inhibition in cancer cells through phosphorylation of FAK's critical tyrosine 397 (Y397). We also showed that HER2 forms a direct protein-protein interaction with the FAK-FERM-F1 lobe, promoting direct phosphorylation of Y397. In addition, FAK-kinase inhibition induced two forms of compensatory RTK reprogramming: (i) the rapid phosphorylation and activation of RTK signaling pathways in RTK High cells and (ii) the long-term acquisition of RTKs novel to the parental cell line in RTK Low cells. Finally, HER2 +: cancer cells displayed resistance to FAK-kinase inhibition in 3D growth assays using a HER2 isogenic system and HER2 + cancer cell lines. Our data indicate a novel drug resistance mechanism to FAK-kinase inhibitors whereby HER2 and other RTKs can rescue and maintain FAK activation (pY397) even in the presence of FAK-kinase inhibition. These data may have important ramifications for existing clinical trials of FAK inhibitors and suggest that individual tumor stratification by RTK expression would be important to predict patient response to FAK-kinase inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(12); 3028-39. ©2016 AACR., Competing Interests: We declare no financial conflicts of interest. W.G. Cance is Chief Scientific Officer of FAKnostics, LLC, a company focused on FAK biomarkers and therapeutics., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Little is known about endogenous estrogen receptor β (ERβ) gene targets in human breast cancer. We reported that estradiol (E(2)) induces nuclear respiratory factor-1 (NRF-1) transcription through ERα in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Here we report that 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), with an EC(50) of ~1.7 nM, increases NRF-1 expression by recruiting ERβ, cJun, cFos, CBP, and RNA polymerase II to and dismissing NCoR from the NRF1 promoter. Promoter deletion and transient transfection studies showed that the estrogen response element (ERE) is essential and that an adjacent AP-1 site contributes to maximal 4-OHT-induced NRF-1 transcription. siRNA knockdown of ERβ revealed that ERβ inhibits basal NRF-1 expression and is required for 4-OHT-induced NRF-1 transcription. An AP-1 inhibitor blocked 4-OHT-induced NRF-1 expression. The 4-OHT-induced increase in NRF-1 resulted in increased transcription of NRF-1 target CAPNS1 but not CYC1, CYC2, or TFAM despite increased NRF-1 coactivator PGC-1α protein. The absence of TFAM induction corresponds to a lack of Akt-dependent phosphorylation of NRF-1 with 4-OHT treatment. Overexpression of NRF-1 inhibited 4-OHT-induced apoptosis and siRNA knockdown of NRF-1 increased apoptosis, indicating an antiapoptotic role for NRF-1. Overall, NRF-1 expression and activity is regulated by 4-OHT via endogenous ERβ in MCF-7 cells.