Search

Digital smartphone assistants for the care and support of people with dementia (PwD) have great potential due to the wide availability of smartphones and a growing number of users aged above 65. Research has mainly focused on the development of applications for only one user group (patients, caregivers, or relatives respectively), and with only one or a few functions included (Yousaf et al., 2020). A more integrative, multi-user, and multifunctional application would be beneficial because it could be adapted to the users' needs more flexibly. This qualitative interview study was the first step in a co-creative process with a user-centered approach aimed at developing a multifunctional digital assistant.Qualitative content analysis (Mayring, 2010) combining deductive and inductive techniques was applied to identify burdens, needs, functions, ethical considerations, and acceptance aspects. 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted with three participant groups (relatives of PwD; caregivers and nursing staff; psychologists). Interviews were conducted via video conferences due to Covid-19 restrictions. After the completion of all interviews, participants received several questionnaires on acceptance aspects (Technology Usage Inventory [TUI], acceptance rating of specific functions), and technological affinity (TA-EG questionnaire) via letter. Interviews were transcribed verbatim with the software MAXQDA. Coding was done by two independent researchers. A coding frame was generated using the interview guide as a theoretical basis and the collected data for building inductive categories. The coding frame was pilot-tested before the final analysis and intercoder reliability was sufficient (k=.81).Preliminary results showed that dealing with symptoms of dementia in everyday life was burdening. Emotional needs in patients and needs for additional care resources in relatives and caregivers were the most important unanswered needs. 53 functions were suggested in the areas: digital care, support, training, monitoring, navigation, leisure activities, and social contacts. Participants had ethical requirements (i.e. data protection, privacy, and autonomy) that if met, would enhance acceptance. Results on questionnaires showed positive attitudes towards, curiosity about, and no insecurity with regards to technology. The overall acceptability of suggested functions was high.Participants showed a large interest in the digital assistant. The importance of data protection was underlined.

A meta‐analysis of 76 studies (N = 31,016) examined the relationship between social identification and depression. Overall, individuals who identify highly with a group tend to report less depression (average rz = −.15). However, a large amount of variability between studies was observed. The 95% prediction interval, which indicates the true effect size that can be expected in future research, ranged from rz = −.50 to .19. The relationship between depression and social identification is more complex than previously assumed. Some variability is related to the social identification measure used. Studies that focused on identification with interactive groups (rz = −.28) had larger effect sizes than studies that focused on social categories (rz = −.11). Moreover, studies of non‐stigmatized groups (rz = −.24) had larger effect sizes than studies of stigmatized groups (rz = −.10). In conclusion, the structure and social identity content of groups appear to play an important role in the relationship between depression and social identification.

Rationale Drinking alcohol is associated with various interpersonal effects, including effects on cognitive empathy. Empathic accuracy (EA) is a form of cognitive empathy concerned with perceivers’ accuracy in inferring a target’s thoughts and feelings. The effects of alcohol on EA have not previously been studied. Objectives We examined the effect of a moderate alcohol dose on EA in social drinkers. Methods Fifty-four men with varying levels of hazardous drinking according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) participated in a randomized, double-blind, between-group study. The alcohol group received 0.56 g/kg alcohol in a vodka and tonic-mixed drink. The placebo group received tonic, with 4 ml of vodka sprayed on top. All participants performed an EA task that involved watching 16 videos of people narrating positive and negative emotional autobiographical events and continuously rating how targets felt while narrating. Results There were no significant main effects of beverage condition on the EA task. There was an effect of the condition by AUDIT interaction for EA on the positive videos. Post-hoc simple contrasts revealed that in participants with lower AUDIT scores, the alcohol condition had lower EA for positive videos than the placebo condition. No significant main effect for condition occurred in the participants with higher AUDIT scores. Conclusions The effect of condition in participants with lower AUDIT scores indicates alcohol selectively reduced EA in individuals low on hazardous drinking. This suggests either alcohol-induced impairments of EA for positive events or a positivity bias in men at low risk for alcohol dependency. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00213-018-4859-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.