Search

Copyright of Anaesthesiologie & Intensivmedizin is the property of DGAI e.V. - Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin e.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: A routine infectious disease service was established in January 1998 in order to optimize the antibiotic usage and prescription pattern of a neurologic intensive care unit (NICU). Methods: Treatment guidelines for the most prevalent infections were implemented and individual antibiotic regimes were discussed at the bedside with infectious disease experts. Results: This interdisciplinary cooperation reduced the total number of antibiotics prescribed by 38.1%, from 7,789 in 1997 to 4,822 in 1998, without compromising patient outcomes (mortality rate: 22/313 patients in 1997 vs 32/328 patients in 1998). Total patient days (2,254 days vs 2,296 days) and average length of stay in the NICU (7.2 days vs 7.0 days) were comparable. Antimicrobial expenditure decreased by 44.8% (71,680 Euros in 1997 vs 39,567 Euros in 1998). Taking into account the costs for the infectious disease service (approximately 8,000 Euros in 1998), a total saving of 24,113 Euros was made. The dramatic reduction in antibiotic usage (mainly of carbapenems) resulted in a statistically significant decreased isolation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (p < 0.05), Enterobacter cloacae (p < 0.05), multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p < 0.05) and Candida spp. (p < 0.05), without any change in the infection control guidelines. Conclusion: These data show that an infectious disease service can optimize and reduce antibiotic usage. This results in a decrease in the occurrence of multiresistant gram-negative pathogens and Candida spp. in intensive care units and, at the same time, saves costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hand hygiene is considered to be the pillar of infection control and prevention. Despite national and international recommendations on hand hygiene, compliance remains low. Basic requirements allowing adequate hand hygiene compliance, in theory at least, are well known. Why then is it so hard to achieve acceptable compliance despite sufficient access to hand disinfectant dispensers, repeated training, and participation in national campaigns? Could it be that hand hygiene is regarded as too laborious, and changes to the established work-flow are needed to increase compliance? Some practicable examples are presented and pitfalls in defining compliance are discussed. Ownership for compliance must come from within clinical teams, and not solely driven from the infection control team. Support from the hospital management is essential. Ideally, the concepts presented allow a simple and efficient implementation of hand hygiene as part of the clinical work-flow to achieve an increase in compliance in the longer term., (Copyright © 2013 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Individual patient risk factors for wound infections, such as alcohol abuse, smoking or obesity can usually only be modified to a small extent. Studies have shown a reduction of surgical site infections due to the implementation of a benchmarking surveillance system. In order to prevent surgical site infections a variety of interventions are available, such as glucose control, correction of anemia and malnutrition and antibiotic therapy of infections before elective surgery. Reduction of the microbial skin flora by whole body washing procedures, avoidance of sharp razor shaving, application of antibiotic prophylaxis and correct surgical hand disinfection are additional measures. Intraoperative hypothermia should be avoided and strict compliance with asepsis is mandatory. Postoperative preventive measures include appropriate wound care and rapid removal of wound drainage.

Surgical site infections are mainly caused by bacteria from the patients' skin or gut flora representing endogenous infections. In orthopedic and trauma surgery the skin commensals dominate and as a consequence Gram-positive bacteria are the main pathogens, particularly S. aureus. Additionally and especially in the case of foreign body infections, less virulent pathogens, e.g. coagulase-negative staphylococci play an important role. Due to newer microbiological techniques in detecting pathogens the spectrum of causative organisms is steadily increasing. As known for other nosocomial infections the relevance of multidrug resistant bacteria in surgical site infections is growing and the key player is methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); however vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), extended spectrum betalactamases and/or carbapenemases producing enterobacteria and recently even panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates have to be considered.

This review focuses on the presentation of the diagnostic and therapeutic principles for treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of long bones in adults. Early detection of the offending bacteria is a crucial step which has to be performed with tissue and fluids from the depth of the wound. Superficial samples and swaps from fistulas should be avoided and are not considered to be representative. Chronic osteomyelitis is characterized by necrotic and nonvascularized bony tissue which represents one of the most relevant sources for recurrence infection. Appropriate therapy includes radical excision of the diseased bone and infected scar tissue, closure of the wound with well-vascularized (muscle) flaps, stabilization, and administration of adequate antibiotics.

Periprosthetic knee joint infection is a rare complication. However, patients as well as surgeons have to deal with severe problems. The past years have brought new knowledge on periprosthetic knee joint infections which have resulted in new classifications. The present manuscript evaluates the current literature on this topic and presents a new therapeutic algorithm.

Chronic osteomyelitis is a severe complication characterized by soft tissue and bone pathogenic infection resulting in osseous destruction. Surgical management is demanding and poses a challenge in achieving the goals of treatment, which are control of infection, bone healing as well as satisfactory functional outcome. Therapeutic strategies are based on a combined application of radical surgery and systemic antibiotic therapy. The bony defects which remain after extensive debridement have to be reconstructed with bone grafting after soft tissue coverage and the healing process is decisive for a successful outcome.

Hand hygiene is considered to be the single most effective measure to prevent healthcare-associated infection. Although there have been several reports on hand hygiene compliance, data on patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms in special isolation conditions are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a prospective observational study of indications for, and compliance with, hand hygiene in patients colonised or infected with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing enterobacteria in surgical intensive and intermediate care units. Hand disinfectant used during care of patients with MRSA was measured. Observed daily hand hygiene indications were higher in MRSA isolation conditions than in ESBL isolation conditions. Observed compliance rates were 47% and 43% for the MRSA group and 54% and 51% for the ESBL group in the surgical intensive care unit and the intermediate care unit, respectively. Compliance rates before patient contact or aseptic tasks were significantly lower (17-47%) than after contact with patient, body fluid or patient's surroundings (31-78%). Glove usage instead of disinfection was employed in up to 100% before patient contact. However, compliance rates calculated from disinfectant usage were two-fold lower (intensive care: 24% vs 47%; intermediate care: 21% vs 43%). This study is the first to provide data on hand hygiene in patients with MDR bacteria and includes a comparison of observed and calculated compliance. Compliance is low in patients under special isolation conditions, even for the indications of greatest impact in preventing healthcare-associated infections. These data may help to focus measures to reduce transmission of MDR bacteria and improve patient safety., (Copyright © 2010 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The serum bactericidal test measures the highest level of an antibiotic-containing serum dilution at which 99.9% of bacteria are killed. In this study the serum bactericidal activity of piperacillin/tazobactam was determined for bacteria often involved in severe infections. In earlier studies titres >/=1:8 in the serum bactericidal tests correlated well with clinical success in the treatment of endocarditis and osteomyelitis as well as bacterial eradication., Methods: Blood samples of 6 healthy volunteers were taken before and 1 and 4 h after piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g) administration. Serum concentrations and serum bactericidal activity were determined for 10 strains each of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli, both piperacillin-resistant and piperacillin-susceptible according to NCCLS guidelines., Results: 100% of S. aureus and piperacillin-susceptible E. coli, 90% of piperacillin-resistant E. coli and 80% of P. aeruginosa were killed 1 h after drug administration. 4 h after drug administration serum bactericidal activity decreased to 60% for S. aureus, 90% for piperacillin-susceptible E. coli, 80% for piperacillin-resistant E. coli and 30% for P. aeruginosa., Conclusions: Excellent serum bactericidal activity of piperacillin/tazobactam was recorded 1 h after drug administration for S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa. After 4 h limited killing rates for P. aeruginosa could be detected, which supports the idea of a combination therapy., (Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel)

We prospectively studied the difference in detection rates of multi-resistant Gram-positive and multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in the inanimate environment of patients harbouring these organisms. Up to 20 different locations around 190 patients were surveyed. Fifty-four patients were infected or colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and 136 with multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The environmental detection rate for MRSA or VRE was 24.7% (174/705 samples) compared with 4.9% (89/1827 samples) for multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (P<0.001). Gram-positive bacteria were isolated more frequently than Gram-negatives from the hands of patients (P<0.001) and hospital personnel (P=0.1145). Environmental contamination did not differ between the intensive care units (ICUs) and the general wards (GWs), which is noteworthy because our ICUs are routinely disinfected twice a day, whereas GWs are cleaned just once a day with detergent. Current guidelines for the prevention of spread of multi-resistant bacteria in the hospital setting do not distinguish between Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates. Our results suggest that the inanimate environment serves as a secondary source for MRSA and VRE, but less so for Gram-negative bacteria. Thus, strict contact isolation in a single room with complete barrier precautions is recommended for MRSA or VRE; however, for multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, contact isolation with barrier precautions for close contact but without a single room seems sufficient. This benefits not only the patients, but also the hospital by removing some of the strain placed on already over-stretched resources.

In addition to MIC and MBC tests in this study the serum bactericidal activity of 3.1 microg/ml of moxifloxacin or 5.2 microg/ml of levofloxacin was determined against ten susceptible strains of S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Moxifloxacin achieved markedly better activity against S. aureus and S. epidermidis as compared to levofloxacin. Activity of moxifloxacin against E. coli and K. pneumoniae was excellent but not superior to levofloxacin. In conclusion both fluorquinolones are highly effective against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, moxifloxacin being superior with respect to gram-positives like S. aureus and S. epidermidis., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Background: In clinical practice, scientific evidence about infection control is often ignored and hygiene rituals are followed., Methods: Within an evidence-based infection control program, a quarterly rotating surveillance program for nosocomial infections was implemented in 4 intensive care units (ICUs) at the Aachen University Hospital, Germany., Results: For the first time, the unit-specific nosocomial infection situation was made clear to the clinical staff by interpretive feedback of the surveillance data. This led to an increased awareness of infection control and a critical review of hygiene practices. After the first surveillance period, the hygiene practices of each ICU were revised and modified. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee guidelines for the prevention of nosocomial infections were adopted and established in tight collaboration with the ward staff., Conclusions: Within the surveillance process, communication and team spirit between infection control and patient care personnel showed a remarkable improvement. Awareness and compliance with hospital hygiene and infection control practices could be raised without directive interaction.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the moistened swab technique vs. Rodac plates for detecting Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in the inanimate environment. Over a period of 22 months, the environment of 190 patients infected or colonized with MRSA, VRE or multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria was sampled in turn. MRSA and VRE could be detected with either method in 33 out of 54 (61.1%) patient rooms in 174 out of 706 (24.6%) environmental samples. However, multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria were found in 42 out of 136 (30.9%) rooms with a very low frequency of 89 out of 1827 (4.9%) environmental samples (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity of the swab technique for Gram-positive cocci was 54% (94/174) vs. 69.5% (121/174) for the Rodac plates, ([CI95%], 47-61% vs. 62-76%, p < 0.05). In contrast, the sensitivity of the swab technique for Gram-negative bacteria was 74.2% (66/89) vs. 42.7% (38/89) for the Rodac plates, ([CI95%], 64-83% vs. 32-54%, p < 0.05). In conclusion, environmental contamination with Gram positive cocci is detected more often than with Gram-negative bacteria. For the detection of Gram-positive cocci, Rodac plates are superior to the swab technique; whereas Gram-negative rods can be detected more often by the swab technique. All these results proved to be statistically significant.

An infectious disease consulting service was set up at a large tertiary university hospital in 1996 to evaluate and to improve antibiotic prescription patterns. Treatment guidelines for the most common bacterial infections were implemented. On daily ward rounds antibiotic therapies without evidence of an infectious disease were stopped and inappropriate regimens were changed by an infectious disease specialist. During a 6-month prospective intervention period, 3,528 patients were studied on 13 wards of the department of internal medicine; 513 of these patients (14.5%) received antibiotic therapy. These treatment courses were evaluated as adequate in 394 cases (76.8%) and incorrect in 119 cases (23.2%). Inadequate antibiotic substances were chosen in 72 out of 119 cases (60.5%) and there was no indication for treatment in 38 out of 119 cases (32%). Pathogen-specific therapies were inadequate significantly more often than empirical antimicrobial therapies (p < 0.001). In addition, the duration of the perioperative prophylaxis could be limited to 1 d. Comparing the intervention period with a 3-month control interval without an infectious disease consulting service, a total of 31,510 Euro (including the costs for the infectious disease specialist) could be saved. No increase in infection-related mortality or length of stay was observed. These data show that an infectious disease consulting service optimizes antibiotic usage, and is cost-effective as a result of a significant cost reduction in hospitals, while not interfering with the quality of medical care.