Search

The case of a 62-year-old Caucasian woman who underwent urgent hip hemiarthroplasty for repair of a pathological fracture is reported. The patient's medical history was significant for renal cell carcinoma, cerebellar metastases, and sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism. Her intraoperative course was complicated by profound hypothermia, bradycardia, augmentation of neuromuscular blockade, delayed emergence, failure of postoperative extubation, and need for mechanical ventilation. The intensive care course was significant for hypothermia requiring forced-air warming, treatment with intravenous thyroxine (T4), and hemodynamic supportive care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To discuss the pathophysiology and clinical implications of spurious hypoxemia in the setting of hyperleukocytosis.Design: Case report and review of the literature.Setting: A 22-bed, adult neurosciences critical care unit at a tertiary care hospital.Patient: A 49-yr-old male with chronic myelogenous leukemia.Interventions: Administration of hydroxyurea and imatinib mesylate.Measurements and Main Results: The patient was admitted to the neurosciences critical care unit with an acute nontraumatic subdural hematoma that required emergent surgical evacuation. His clinical course was notable for neurologic deterioration, sepsis, hyperleukocytosis, severe hypoxemia, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. An inverse relationship was observed between arterial oxygen tension and the magnitude of hyperleukocytosis. Hypoxemia resolved after the institution of chemotherapy and normalization of white cell count. Pulse oximeter saturation was normal throughout.Conclusions: Patients with hyperleukocytosis are at risk for severe hypoxemia, which may be real or spurious. Failure to recognize spurious hypoxemia can lead to unnecessary diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions, exposing patients to avoidable risk. A diagnostic algorithm is proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early left ventricular systolic dysfunction is common after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Echocardiography (Echo) can evaluate cardiac function across various clinical scenarios; however, its utilization in isolated TBI remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we aim to examine Echo utilization in hospitalized adults with isolated TBI., Methods: Using a propensity-matched cohort based on All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group severity of illness, we performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusting for demographics, admitting hospital characteristics, TBI characteristics, cardiac comorbidities, and cardiac complications) to examine factors associated with Echo utilization in patients with isolated TBI in the US National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020). We reported adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals., Results: In 4874 patients matched by APR-DRG severity of illness, the factors associated with Echo utilization were as follows: Older age compared to 18-44 years, Urban teaching hospital: aOR 1.44 [1.05;1.98], TBI associated with syncope: 3.29 [2.68;4.07], ICP monitoring: 2.26 [1.18, 4.45), hypertension: 1.35 [1.18, 1.54], myocardial infarction: 2.89 [2.14, 3.94], atrial fibrillation:1.38 [1.10, 1.74], heart failure: 1.57 [1.31, 1.87], ventricular tachycardia: 1.85 [1.28, 2.71), and pulmonary embolism: 2.61 [1.51, 4.66]., Conclusions: Echo utilization was associated with TBI etiology, pre-existing cardiac comorbidities, and in-hospital cardiac complications. These findings need validation in prospective studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We implemented a quality improvement project to transition from routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling to indication-based sampling in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients with an external ventricular drain (EVD)., Methods: Forty-seven patients were assessed across 2 epochs: routine (n=22) and indication-based (n=25) CSF sampling. The primary outcome was the number of CSF samples, and secondary outcomes included cost reductions and ventriculostomy-associated infections., Results: Patient characteristics were similar in the routine and indication-based sampling groups, as was the mean (SD) EVD duration (13.86 [5.28] days vs. 12.44 [4.78] days, respectively; P=0.936). One hundred eight CSF samples were collected during the quality improvement project; 81 in the routine sampling period and 27 in the indication-based sampling period. The median (interquartile range) CSF sampling rate reduced from 4 (3 to 4) per patient during routine sampling to 1 (0 to 2) during indication-based sampling (odds ratio: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.08-0.46; P<0.001), representing a 73% reduction in the number of samples after the transition to indication-based sampling. Each CSF sample cost $723, resulting in total sampling costs in the routine and indication-based sampling periods of $58,571 and $19,524, respectively. Therefore, the mean cost per patient was significantly higher in the routine sampling period than in the indication-based period ($2772 [$615] vs. $889 [$165], respectively; P=0.007). There were no ventriculostomy-associated infections in either period., Conclusion: Transitioning from routine to indication-based CSF sampling in aSAH patients with an EVD reduced sampling frequency and associated costs without increasing infection rates., Competing Interests: M.R.L. reports unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Stryker; equity interest in Proprio, Synchron, Hyperion Surgical, Stroke Diagnostics, Fluid Biomed, Apertur; consulting for Aeaean Advisers, Metis Innovative, Stereotaxis, Genomadix; data safety monitoring board of Arsenal Medical; editorial board of Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. A.V.L. reports receiving salary support from LifeCenter Northwest. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: We examine what is known, what is new, and what is emerging in acute neurotrauma relevant to the anesthesiologist., Recent Findings: Timely and goal-directed care is critical for all patients requiring urgent/emergent anesthesia care. Anesthesia care for acute neurological injury should incorporate understanding the evolution of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury that translates to preoperative preparation, hemodynamic resuscitation, prevention of second insults, and safe transport between care settings. Anesthesia care should support optimizing patient outcomes., Summary: Best practices involve extrapolating data from the intensive care unit setting since there is a lack of research addressing anesthesia care for acute neurological injury. There are opportunities to generate data to support evidence-based anesthetic care., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Background: Intraoperative events and clinical management of deceased organ donors after brain death are poorly characterized and may consequently vary between hospitals and organ procurement organization (OPO) regions. In a multicenter cohort, we sought to estimate the incidence of hypotension and anesthetic and nonanesthetic medication use during organ recovery procedures., Methods: We used data from electronic anesthetic records generated during organ recovery procedures from brain-dead adults across a Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) cohort of 14 US hospitals and 4 OPO regions (2014-2020). Hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure or MAP <60 mm Hg for at least 10 cumulative minutes was the primary outcome of interest. The associations between hypotension and age, sex, race, anesthesia time, OPOs, and OPO case volume were examined using multivariable mixed-effects Poisson regression analyses with robust standard error estimates. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to describe the variation between-MPOG centers and the OPO regions in the use of medications, time of the operation, and duration of the operation., Results: We examined 1338 brain-dead adult donors, with a mean age of 42± (standard deviation [SD] 15) years; 60% (n = 801) were males and 67% (n = 891) non-Hispanic White. During the entire intraoperative monitoring period, 321 donors (24%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 22%-26%) had hypotension for a median of 13.8% [quartile1-quartile 3: 9.4%-21%] of the monitoring period and a minimum of 10 minutes to a maximum of 96 minutes [(median: 17, quartile1-quartile 3: 12-24]). The probability having hypotension in donors 35 to 64 years and 65 years and older were approximately 30% less than in donors 18 to 34 years of age (adjusted relative risk ratios, aRR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.55-0.82, aRR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42-0.94, respectively). Donors received intravenous heparin (96.4%, n = 1291), neuromuscular blockers (89.5%, n = 1198), vasoactive medications (82.7%, n = 1108), crystalloids (76.2%, n = 1020), halogenated anesthetic gases (63.5%, n = 850), diuretics (43.8%, n = 587), steroids (16.7%, n = 224), and opioids (23.2%, n = 310). The largest practice heterogeneity observed between the MPOG center and OPO regions was steroids (between-center ICCs = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62-0.75, between-region ICCs = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.27-0.63) and diuretics (between-center ICCs = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.36-0.6, between-region ICCs = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.22-0.49)., Conclusions: Despite guidelines recommending maintenance of MAP >60 mm Hg in adult brain-dead organ donors, hypotension during recovery procedures was common. Future research is needed to clarify the relationship between intraoperative events with donation and transplantation outcomes and to identify best practices for the anesthetic management of brain-dead donors in the operating room., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article., (Copyright © 2024 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Background: Key goals during intracranial surgery are to facilitate rapid emergence and extubation for early neurologic evaluation. Longer-acting opioids are often avoided or administered at subtherapeutic doses due to their perceived risk of sedation and delayed emergence. However, inadequate analgesia and increased postoperative pain are common after intracranial surgery. In this multicenter study, we describe variability in opioid and nonopioid administration patterns in patients undergoing intracranial surgery., Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study using the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group database. Opioid and nonopioid practice patterns in 31,217 cases undergoing intracranial surgery across 11 institutions in the United States are described., Results: Across all 11 institutions, total median [interquartile range] oral morphine equivalents, normalized to weight and anesthesia duration was 0.17 (0.08 to 0.3) mg.kg.min -1 . There was a 7-fold difference in oral morphine equivalents between the lowest (0.05 [0.02 to 0.13] mg.kg.min -1 ) and highest (0.36 [0.18 to 0.54] mg.kg.min -1 ) prescribing institutions. Patients undergoing supratentorial surgery had higher normalized oral morphine equivalents compared with those having infratentorial surgery [0.17 [0.08-0.31] vs. 0.15 [0.07-0.27] mg/kg/min -1 ; P <0.001); however, this difference is clinically small. Nonopioid analgesics were not administered in 20% to 96.8% of cases across institutions., Conclusion: This study found wide variability for both opioid and nonopioid utilization at an institutional level. Future work on practitioner-level opioid and nonopioid use and its impact on outcomes after intracranial surgery should be conducted., Competing Interests: A.V.L. reports salary support from LifeCenter Northwest. P.V. receives support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. E.S. is supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (K08DA042314) and reports consulting fees unrelated to this work from Analysis Group, Inc. and Lucid Lane, LLC. D.A.C. is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number K08HL159327. D.A.C. declares research support from Merck & Co. paid to the University of Michigan, unrelated to the presented work in the financial section. B.I.N. is a JNA Editorial Board member. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Prompt emergence from general anesthesia is crucial after neurosurgical procedures, such as craniotomies, to facilitate timely neurological evaluation for identification of intraoperative complications. Delayed emergence can be caused by residual anesthetics, metabolic imbalances, and intracranial pathology, for which an eye examination can provide early diagnostic clues. The sunset sign (or setting sun sign), characterized by a downward deviation of the eyes, can be an early indicator of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) or midbrain compression, as is commonly observed in states of hydrocephalus or periaqueductal or tectal plate dysfunction. A 50-year-old woman with a history of headaches, diplopia, and Parinaud syndrome presented with a pineal mass and underwent an occipital and suboccipital craniotomy with endoscopically-assisted tumor resection. The procedure was managed with neurophysiological monitoring to detect surgical compromise on neurophysiological function. An external ventricular drain (EVD) was placed for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage to facilitate brain relaxation and operative intervention. Blood loss was estimated to be 200 ml. Thirty minutes after surgery, the patient did not open her eyes to verbal commands despite the cessation of anesthetics significantly earlier. Eye examination revealed an intermittent downward gaze, recognized as the sunset sign. Arterial blood gas results and metabolic parameters were within normal limits, shifting the focus to possible intracranial complications as the source of her delayed emergence. Consequently, an emergent head computer tomography (CT) was ordered, and the EVD was clamped and not monitored for transport. The CT scan revealed tension pneumocephalus compressing the midbrain. The patient was transferred to the neurocritical care unit, where the admission ICP measured from the EVD was 50 mmHg. Initial critical care treatment included maintaining sedation, CSF drainage via the EVD, 100% oxygen, and head of bed at zero degrees. The patient underwent an MRI brain approximately six hours post-operatively, revealing restricted diffusion in the bilateral medial thalamic regions. The patient was successfully extubated on postoperative day one. Over the following 48 hours, the sunset sign disappeared, the tension pneumocephalus resolved, ICP normalized, and the patient's neurological status gradually improved. Delayed emergence after neurosurgical procedures can be multifactorial, and eye movement abnormalities like the sunset sign can offer early diagnostic clues. In this case, the sunset sign occurred from elevated ICP due to tension pneumocephalus, a rare but serious postoperative complication. Early recognition of the sunset sign and immediate neuroimaging allowed for prompt relief of intracranial hypertension, highlighting the importance of incorporating detailed ocular assessments into postoperative evaluations. The sunset sign is an important clinical marker of increased ICP and midbrain dysfunction, warranting urgent investigation. This case underscores the need for early, thorough postoperative assessment, including eye examination, to identify and manage potential complications that may delay emergence from general anesthesia. Eye examination may be warranted as part of routine neurological evaluation during emergence from general anesthesia., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: Dr. Abhijit V Lele receives salary support from LifeCenter Northwest, which is not relevant to the submitted work. ., (Copyright © 2024, Kaplan et al.)

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a stratified risk model for predicting high opioid use in patients with acute brain injury due to stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to a neurocritical care intensive care unit. Methods : We examined the factors associated with the use of high-opioids (≥75th quartile, ≥17.5 oral morphine equivalent/ICU day) in a retrospective cohort study including patients with acute ischemic stroke, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, and TBI. We then developed, trained, and validated a risk model to predict high-dose opioids. Results : Among 2490 patients aged 45-64 years ( β = -0.25), aged 65-80 years ( β = -0.97), and aged ≥80 years ( β = -1.17), a history of anxiety/depression ( β = 0.57), a history of illicit drug use ( β = 0.79), admission diagnosis ( β = 1.21), lowest Glasgow Coma Scale Score (GCSL) [GCSL 3-8 ( β = -0.90], {GCS L 9-12 (( β = -0.34)], mechanical ventilation ( β = 1.21), intracranial pressure monitoring ( β = 0.69), craniotomy/craniectomy ( β = 0.6), and paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity ( β = 1.12) were found to be significant predictors of high-dose opioid use. When validated, the model demonstrated an area under the curve ranging from 0.72 to 0.82, accuracy ranging from 0.68 to 0.91, precision ranging from 0.71 to 0.94, recall ranging from 0.75 to 1, and F1 ranging from 0.74 to 0.95. Conclusions : A personalized stratified risk model may allow clinicians to predict the risk of high opioid use in patients with acute brain injury due to stroke or TBI. Findings need validation in multi-center cohorts.

Background: Long-term outcomes of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) and their surrogate decision makers (SDMs) are insufficiently explored., Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, observational study of patients with SABI who required mechanical ventilation between September and November 2021. Two telephonic interviews were conducted at 6-12 months and 18-24 months post SABI. Patients' functional outcomes at both time points were measured on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended and categorized as dead (1), dependent (2-4), or independent (5-8). SDMs were interviewed at 18-24 months using validated screening tools for depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder and qualitative questions about the hardest challenges during their recovery journey., Results: We included 103 patients (median age 58 years, 28% female, 77% White, 51% with stroke, 49% with traumatic brain injury); in-hospital mortality was 46%. At 6-12 months and 18-24 months, 34% and 36% were independent, respectively; the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score improved ≥ 1 point for 32% between time points. Quality of life was perceived as acceptable for 47% of all survivors and 58% of independent patients by their SDMs. At 18-24 months, we reached 56 SDMs (median age 58 years, 71% female, 72% White). Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder were reported in 18%, 30%, and 7%, respectively (23%, 34%, and 9% in the 35 SDMs of survivors and 10%, 24%, and 5% in the 21 SDMs to deceased patients). Main themes about challenges for patients and SDMs included extrinsic factors related to the health care system, and intrinsic factors related to the brain injury: difficulties in adapting to a new state, mental health symptoms, and social isolation., Conclusions: Mental health symptoms among SDMs of patients with SABI were frequent at 18-24 months, and the patients' quality of life was deemed unacceptable for 42% of SDMs to independent survivors. Our findings underscore the need for psychosocial support to SDMs, the importance of addressing modifiable barriers to patient and SDM well-being, and the need for more patient/family-centric outcome measures., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Ethical Approval/Informed Consent This study was approved by the University of Washington Human Subjects Division (IRB number 00013927)., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.)

This systematic review aimed to identify and describe best practice for the intraoperative anesthetic management of patients undergoing emergent/urgent decompressive craniotomy or craniectomy for any indication. The PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles related to urgent/emergent craniotomy/craniectomy for intracranial hypertension or brain herniation. Only articles focusing on intraoperative anesthetic management were included; those investigating surgical or intensive care unit management were excluded. Nine studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified after screening 1885 abstracts and full text review of 276 articles. Six of the 9 included studies were prospective and 3 were retrospective, and included sample sizes ranging between 48 and 373 patients. All were single center studies. Three studies examined anesthetic technique (volatile vs. intravenous), 1 examined osmotic diuresis, 1 examined extubation in the operating room, 1 examined quality metrics, and 3 examined intracranial pressure and changes in vital sign. There was insufficient evidence to perform a meta-analysis. Overall, there was limited evidence regarding the anesthetic management of patients having urgent/emergent craniotomy or craniectomy for intracranial hypertension or herniation due to any cause., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published literature regarding postoperative stroke and mortality in patients with a history of stroke and to provide a framework for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care in an elective setting., Recent Findings: Patients with nonneurological, noncardiac, and nonvascular surgery within three months after stroke have a 153-fold risk, those within 6 months have a 50-fold risk, and those within 12 months have a 20-fold risk of postoperative stroke. There is a 12-fold risk of in-hospital mortality within three months and a three-to-four-fold risk of mortality for more than 12 months after stroke. The risk of stroke and mortality continues to persist years after stroke. Recurrent stroke is common in patients in whom anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy is discontinued. Stroke and time elapsed after stroke should be included in the preoperative assessment questionnaire, and a stroke-specific risk assessment should be performed before surgical planning is pursued., Summary: In patients with a history of a recent stroke, anesthesiology, surgery, and neurology experts should create a shared mental model in which the patient/surrogate decision-maker is informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical procedure; secondary-stroke-prevention medications are reviewed; plans are made for interruptions and resumption; and intraoperative care is individualized to reduce the likelihood of postoperative stroke or death., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

In this review article, we explore the implementation and outcomes of enhanced recovery after spine surgery (spine ERAS) across different World Bank country-income levels. A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases for articles on the implementation of spine ERAS in both adult and pediatric populations. Study characteristics, ERAS elements, and outcomes were analyzed and meta-analyses were performed for length of stay (LOS) and cost outcomes. The number of spine ERAS studies from low-middle-income countries (LMICs) increased since 2017, when the first spine ERAS implementation study was published. LMICs were more likely than high-income countries (HICs) to conduct studies on patients aged ≥18 years (odds ratio [OR], 6.00; 95% CI, 1.58-42.80), with sample sizes 51 to 100 (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.21-22.90), and randomized controlled trials (OR, 7.25; 95% CI, 1.77-53.50). Preoperative optimization was more frequently implemented in LMICs than in HICs (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.06-4.41), and operation time was more often studied in LMICs (OR 3.78; 95% CI, 1.77-8.35). Implementation of spine ERAS resulted in reductions in LOS in both LMIC (-2.06; 95% CI, -2.47 to -1.64 d) and HIC (-0.99; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.70 d) hospitals. However, spine ERAS implementation did result in a significant reduction in costs. This review highlights the global landscape of ERAS implementation in spine surgery, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing LOS across diverse settings. Further research with standardized reporting of ERAS elements and outcomes is warranted to explore the impact of spine ERAS on cost-effectiveness and other patient-centered outcomes., Competing Interests: A.V.L. reports salary support from LifeCenter Northwest, which is not relevant to the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has been tested and has passed various high-level examinations. However, it has not been tested on an examination such as the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) Standardized Oral Examination (SOE). The SOE is designed to assess higher-level competencies, such as judgment, organization, adaptability to unexpected clinical changes, and presentation of information., Methods: Four anesthesiology fellows were examined on 2 sample ABA SOEs. Their answers were compared to those produced by the same questions asked to ChatGPT. All human and ChatGPT responses were transcribed, randomized by module, and then reproduced as complete examinations, using a commercially available software-based human voice replicator. Eight ABA applied examiners listened to and scored the topic and modules from 1 of the 4 versions of each of the 2 sample examinations. The ABA did not provide any support or collaboration with any authors., Results: The anesthesiology fellow's answers were found to have a better median score than ChatGPT, for the module topics scores (P = .03). However, there was no significant difference in the median overall global module scores between the human and ChatGPT responses (P = .17). The examiners were able to identify the ChatGPT-generated answers for 23 of 24 modules (95.83%), with only 1 ChatGPT response perceived as from a human. In contrast, the examiners thought the human (fellow) responses were artificial intelligence (AI)-generated in 10 of 24 modules (41.67%). Examiner comments explained that ChatGPT generated relevant content, but were lengthy answers, which at times did not focus on the specific scenario priorities. There were no comments from the examiners regarding Chat GPT fact "hallucinations.", Conclusions: ChatGPT generated SOE answers with comparable module ratings to anesthesiology fellows, as graded by 8 ABA oral board examiners. However, the ChatGPT answers were deemed subjectively inferior due to the length of responses and lack of focus. Future curation and training of an AI database, like ChatGPT, could produce answers more in line with ideal ABA SOE answers. This could lead to higher performance and an anesthesiology-specific trained AI useful for training and examination preparation., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article., (Copyright © 2024 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Background: Cerebral edema is a common, potentially life-threatening complication in critically ill patients with acute brain injury. However, uncertainty remains regarding best monitoring and treatment strategies, which may result in wide practice variations., Methods: A 20-question digital survey on monitoring and management practices was disseminated between July 2022 and May 2023 to clinicians who manage cerebral edema. The survey was promoted through email, social media, medical conferences, and the Neurocritical Care Society Web site. We used the χ 2 test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and logistic regression to report factors associated with practice variation, diagnostic monitoring methods, and therapeutic triggers based on practitioner and institutional characteristics., Results: Of 321 participants from 160 institutions in 30 countries, 65% were from university-affiliated centers, 74% were attending physicians, 38% were woman, 38% had neurology training, and 55% were US-based. Eighty-four percent observed practice variations at their institutions, with "provider preference" being cited most (87%). Factors linked to variation included gender, experience, university affiliation, and practicing outside the United States. University affiliates tended to use more tests (median 3.87 vs. 3.43, p = 0.01) to monitor cerebral edema. Regarding management practices, 20% of respondents' preferred timing for decompressive hemicraniectomy was after 48 h, and 37% stated that radiographic findings only would be sufficient to trigger surgery. Fifty percent of respondents reported initiating osmotic therapy based on radiographic indications or prophylactically. There were no significant associations between management strategies and respondent or center characteristics. Twenty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they acquired neuroimaging at intervals of 24 h or less. Within this group, attending physicians were more likely to follow this practice (65.5% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.04)., Conclusions: Cerebral edema monitoring and management strategies vary. Features associated with practice variations include both practitioner and institutional characteristics. We provide a foundation for understanding practice patterns that is crucial for informing educational initiatives, standardizing guidelines, and conducting future trials., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.)

Competing Interests: A.V.L. receives salary support as a Medical Advisor for LifeCenter Northwest, which is not relevant to the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Objective: This study explored the current global landscape of periprocedural care of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)., Methods: An anonymous, 54-question electronic survey was sent to 354 recipients in hospitals worldwide. The responses were stratified by World Bank country income level into high-income (HICs) and low/middle-income (LMICs) countries., Results: A total of 354 survey invitations were issued. Two hundred twenty-three respondents started the survey, and 87 fully completed surveys were obtained from centers in which anesthesiologists were routinely involved in EVT care (38 in HICs; 49 in LMICs). Respondents from 35 (92.1%) HICs and 14 (28.6%) LMICs reported that their centers performed >50 EVTs annually. Respondents from both HICs and LMICs reported low rates of anesthesiologist involvement in pre-EVT care, though a communication system was in place in 100% of HIC centers and 85.7% of LMIC centers to inform anesthesiologists about potential EVTs. Respondents from 71.1% of HIC centers and 51% of LMIC centers reported following a published guideline during EVT management, though the use of cognitive aids was low in both (28.9% and 24.5% in HICs and LMICs, respectively). Variability in multiple areas of practice, including choice of anesthetic techniques, monitoring and management of physiological variables during EVT, and monitoring during intrahospital transport, were reported. Quality metrics were rarely tracked or reported to the anesthesiology teams., Conclusions: This study demonstrated variability in anesthesiology involvement and in clinical care during and after EVT. Centers may consider routinely involving anesthesiologists in pre-EVT care, using evidence-based recommendations for EVT management, and tracking adherence to published guidelines and other quality metrics., Competing Interests: A.V.L. reports salary support as a medical advisor for LifeCenter Northwest, which is not relevant to this work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To examine if increasing blood pressure improves brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO 2 ) in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)., Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data., Setting: Level-I trauma center teaching hospital., Patients: Included patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age and with severe (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 9) TBI who had advanced neuromonitoring (intracranial blood pressure [ICP], PbtO 2 , and cerebral autoregulation testing)., Interventions: The exposure was mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation with a vasopressor, and the primary outcome was a PbtO 2 response. Cerebral hypoxia was defined as PbtO 2 less than 20 mm Hg (low)., Main Results: MAP challenge test results conducted between ICU admission days 1-3 from 93 patients (median age 31; interquartile range [IQR], 24-44 yr), 69.9% male, White ( n = 69, 74.2%), median head abbreviated injury score 5 (IQR 4-5), and median admission GCS 3 (IQR 3-5) were examined. Across all 93 tests, a MAP increase of 25.7% resulted in a 34.2% cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) increase and 16.3% PbtO 2 increase (no MAP or CPP correlation with PbtO 2 [both R2 = 0.00]). MAP augmentation increased ICP when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (8.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.06). MAP augmentation resulted in four PbtO 2 responses (normal and maintained [group 1: 58.5%], normal and deteriorated [group 2: 2.2%; average 45.2% PbtO 2 decrease], low and improved [group 3: 12.8%; average 44% PbtO 2 increase], and low and not improved [group 4: 25.8%]). The average end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ) increase of 5.9% was associated with group 2 when cerebral autoregulation was impaired ( p = 0.02)., Conclusions: MAP augmentation after severe TBI resulted in four distinct PbtO 2 response patterns, including PbtO 2 improvement and cerebral hypoxia. Traditionally considered clinical factors were not significant, but cerebral autoregulation status and ICP responses may have moderated MAP and ETCO 2 effects on PbtO 2 response. Further study is needed to examine the role of MAP augmentation as a strategy to improve PbtO 2 in some patients., Competing Interests: Dr. Lele received funding from LifeCenter Northwest. Dr. Vavilala received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Background: The aim of this survey was to understand institutional spine surgery practices and their concordance with published best practices/recommendations., Methods: Using a global internet-based survey examining perioperative spine surgery practice, reported institutional spine pathway elements (n=139) were compared with the level of evidence published in guideline recommendations. The concordance of clinical practice with guidelines was categorized as poor (≤20%), fair (21%-40%), moderate (41%-60%), good (61%-80%), or very good (81%-100%)., Results: Seventy-two of 409 (17.6%) institutional contacts started the survey, of which 31 (7.6%) completed the survey. Six (19.4%) of the completed surveys were from respondents in low/middle-income countries, and 25 (80.6%) were from respondents in high-income countries. Forty-one incomplete surveys were not included in the final analysis, as most were less than 40% complete. Five of 139 (3.6%) reported elements had very good concordance for the entire cohort; hospitals with spine surgery pathways reported 18 elements with very good concordance, whereas institutions without spine surgery pathways reported only 1 element with very good concordance. Reported spine pathways included between 7 and 47 separate pathway elements. There were 87 unique elements in the reviewed pathways. Only 3 of 87 (3.4%) elements with high-quality evidence demonstrated very good practice concordance., Conclusions: This global survey-based study identified practice variation and low adoption rates of high-quality evidence in the care of patients undergoing complex spine surgery., Competing Interests: A.V.L. reports receiving salary support from LifeCenter Northwest. C.R. is a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We report adherence to 6 Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE) quality metrics (QMs) relevant to patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy or endoscopic clot evacuation after spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH)., Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we describe adherence to the following ASPIRE QMs: acute kidney injury (AKI-01); mean arterial pressure < 65 mm Hg for less than 15 minutes (BP-03); myocardial injury (CARD-02); treatment of high glucose (> 200 mg/dL, GLU-03); reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB-02); and perioperative hypothermia (TEMP-03)., Result: The study included 95 patients (70% male) with median (interquartile range) age 55 (47 to 66) years and ICH score 2 (1 to 3) undergoing craniectomy (n=55) or endoscopic clot evacuation (n=40) after sICH. In-hospital mortality attributable to sICH was 23% (n=22). Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 5 (n=16), preoperative reduced glomerular filtration rate (n=5), elevated cardiac troponin (n=21) and no intraoperative labs with high glucose (n=71), those who were not extubated at the end of the case (n=62) or did not receive a neuromuscular blocker given (n=3), and patients having emergent surgery (n=64) were excluded from the analysis for their respective ASPIRE QM based on predetermined ASPIRE exclusion criteria. For the remaining patients, the adherence to ASPIRE QMs were: AKI-01, craniectomy 34%, endoscopic clot evacuation 1%; BP-03, craniectomy 72%, clot evacuation 73%; CARD-02, 100% for both groups; GLU-03, craniectomy 67%, clot evacuation 100%; NMB-02, clot evacuation 79%, and; TEMP-03, clot evacuation 0% with hypothermia., Conclusion: This study found variable adherence to ASPIRE QMs in sICH patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy or endoscopic clot evacuation. The relatively high number of patients excluded from individual ASPIRE metrics is a major limitation., Competing Interests: A.V.L. reports receiving salary support from LifeCenter Northwest, which is not relevant to this study. M.R.L. reports receiving research support from Medtronic and Stryker, Consulting for Medtronic, Metis Innovative, and Aegean Advisers, and equity interest in Proprio, Cerebrotech, Synchron, Fluid Biomed, and Hyperion Surgical, none of which are relevant to this study. M.J.S. reports salary support to the University of Washington from Life Center Northwest and consulting for Teleflex Medical, neither of which are relevant to this study. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective There is growing interest in the use of phenobarbital for alcohol withdrawal syndrome in critically ill patients, though experience in neurologically injured patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of phenobarbital-containing alcohol withdrawal regimens versus benzodiazepine monotherapy in the neurocritical care unit. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit from January 2014 through November 2021 who received pharmacologic treatment for alcohol withdrawal. Treatment groups were defined as benzodiazepine monotherapy versus phenobarbital alone or in combination with benzodiazepines. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients requiring intubation after receiving alcohol withdrawal treatment. Secondary outcomes included all-cause, in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, discharge disposition, change in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and the use of adjunctive agents. Results We analyzed data from 156 patients, with 77 (49%) in the benzodiazepine group and 79 (51%) in the phenobarbital combination group. The groups were well-balanced for baseline characteristics, though more males (67, 85%) were in the phenobarbital group. Only three (1.9%) patients received phenobarbital monotherapy, and the rest (153, 98.1%) received combination therapy. The percentage of patients requiring mechanical ventilation was significantly higher in the phenobarbital combination group compared to benzodiazepine monotherapy (39% (n=31) versus 13% (n=10); OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.94-9.66; p<0.001). The use of adjunctive propofol and dexmedetomidine was higher in the phenobarbital group (propofol 35% (n= 28) versus 9% (n=7) and dexmedetomidine 30% (n=24) versus 5% (n=4), respectively). Patients in the phenobarbital group also had lower GCS scores and higher Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol (CIWA-Ar) scores during their intensive care unit admission, possibly suggesting more severe alcohol withdrawal. There was no difference in intensive care unit length of stay, all-cause, in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, or therapeutic adjuncts. Conclusions Combination therapy of phenobarbital plus benzodiazepines was associated with higher odds of requiring mechanical ventilation. Few patients received phenobarbital monotherapy. Additional studies are needed to better compare the effects of phenobarbital monotherapy versus benzodiazepines in neurocritical patients., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. University of Washington issued approval STUDY 00014298. The study (STUDY 00014298) was approved (14 February 2022) by the University of Washington Medical Center institutional review board (IRB), and a waiver of informed consent was in place. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: Abhijit V. Lele declare(s) personal fees from LifeCenter Northwest. Medical Advisor. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Norris et al.)

Introduction: Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism and may require anticoagulation. We evaluated the utility of surveillance computed tomography (CT) in patients with tICH who required therapeutic anticoagulation., Methods: This single institution, retrospective study included adult patients with tICH who required anticoagulation within 4 weeks and had a surveillance head CT within 24 hours of reaching therapeutic anticoagulation levels. The primary outcome was hematoma expansion (HE) detected by the surveillance CT. Secondary outcomes included 1) changes in management in patients with HE on the surveillance head CT, 2) HE in the absence of clinical changes, and 3) mortality due to HE. We also compared mortality between patients who did and did not have a surveillance CT., Results: Of 175 patients, 5 (2.9%) were found to have HE. Most (n = 4, 80%) had changes in management including anticoagulation discontinuation (n = 4), reversal (n = 1), and operative management (n = 1). Two patients developed symptoms or exam changes prior to the head CT. Of the 3 patients (1.7%) without preceding exam changes, each had only very minor HE and did not require operative management. No patient experienced mortality directly attributed to HE. There was no difference in mortality between patients who did and those who did not have a surveillance scan., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that most patients with tICH who are started on anticoagulation could be followed clinically, and providers may reserve CT imaging for patients with changes in exam/symptoms or those who have a poor clinical examination to follow., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: to examine factors associated with cardiac evaluation and associations between cardiac test abnormalities and clinical outcomes in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring neurocritical care. Methods : In a cohort of patients ≥18 years, we examined the utilization of electrocardiography (ECG), beta-natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac troponin (cTnI), and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We investigated the association between cTnI, BNP, sex-adjusted prolonged QTc interval, low ejection fraction (EF < 40%), all-cause mortality, death by neurologic criteria (DNC), transition to comfort measures only (CMO), and hospital discharge to home using univariable and multivariable analysis (adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance carrier, pre-admission cardiac disorder, ABI type, admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score, mechanical ventilation, and intracranial pressure [ICP] monitoring). Results : The final sample comprised 11,822 patients: AIS (46.7%), sICH (18.5%), SAH (14.8%), and TBI (20.0%). A total of 63% ( n = 7472) received cardiac workup, which increased over nine years ( p < 0.001). A cardiac investigation was associated with increased age, male sex (aOR 1.16 [1.07, 1.27]), non-white ethnicity (aOR), non-commercial insurance (aOR 1.21 [1.09, 1.33]), pre-admission cardiac disorder (aOR 1.21 [1.09, 1.34]), mechanical ventilation (aOR1.78 [1.57, 2.02]) and ICP monitoring (aOR1.68 [1.49, 1.89]). Compared to AIS, sICH (aOR 0.25 [0.22, 0.29]), SAH (aOR 0.36 [0.30, 0.43]), and TBI (aOR 0.19 [0.17, 0.24]) patients were less likely to receive cardiac investigation. Patients with troponin 25th-50th quartile (aOR 1.65 [1.10-2.47]), troponin 50th-75th quartile (aOR 1.79 [1.22-2.63]), troponin >75th quartile (aOR 2.18 [1.49-3.17]), BNP 50th-75th quartile (aOR 2.86 [1.28-6.40]), BNP >75th quartile (aOR 4.54 [2.09-9.85]), prolonged QTc (aOR 3.41 [2.28; 5.30]), and EF < 40% (aOR 2.47 [1.07; 5.14]) were more likely to be DNC. Patients with troponin 50th-75th quartile (aOR 1.77 [1.14-2.73]), troponin >75th quartile (aOR 1.81 [1.18-2.78]), and prolonged QTc (aOR 1.71 [1.39; 2.12]) were more likely to be associated with a transition to CMO. Patients with prolonged QTc (aOR 0.66 [0.58; 0.76]) were less likely to be discharged home. Conclusions : This large, single-center study demonstrates low rates of cardiac evaluations in TBI, SAH, and sICH compared to AIS. However, there are strong associations between electrocardiography, biomarkers of cardiac injury and heart failure, and echocardiography findings on clinical outcomes in patients with ABI. Findings need validation in a multicenter cohort.

Competing Interests: A.V.L. receives salary support from LifeCenter Northwest organ procurement organization. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Introduction: To describe the perioperative care of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who undergo microsurgical repair of a ruptured intracerebral aneurysm., Methods: An English language survey examined 138 areas of the perioperative care of patients with aSAH. Reported practices were categorized as those reported by <20%, 21% to 40%, 41% to 60%, 61% to 80%, and 81% to 100% of participating hospitals. Data were stratified by Worldbank country income level (high-income or low/middle-income). Variation between country-income groups and between countries was presented as an intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: Forty-eight hospitals representing 14 countries participated in the survey (response rate 64%); 33 (69%) hospitals admitted ≥60 aSAH patients per year. Clinical practices reported by 81 to 100% of the hospitals included placement of an arterial catheter, preinduction blood type/cross match, use of neuromuscular blockade during induction of general anesthesia, delivering 6 to 8 mL/kg tidal volume, and checking hemoglobin and electrolyte panels. Reported use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring was 25% (41% in high-income and 10% in low/middle-income countries), with variation between Worldbank country-income group (ICC 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-2.76) and between countries (ICC 0.44, 95% CI 0.00-0.68). The use of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection was low (2%). Before aneurysm securement, variable in blood pressure targets was reported; systolic blood pressure 90 to 120 mm Hg (30%), 90 to 140 mm Hg (21%), and 90 to 160 mmHg (5%). Induced hypertension during temporary clipping was reported by 37% of hospitals (37% each in high and low/middle-income countries)., Conclusions: This global survey identifies differences in reported practices during the perioperative management of patients with aSAH., Competing Interests: A.L. reports salary support from LifeCenter Northwest. A.U. reports K08NS125038 grant awarded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and a grant from the Brain Aneurysm foundation. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) carries significant mortality and morbidity, with nearly half of SAH survivors having major cognitive dysfunction that impairs their functional status, emotional health, and quality of life. Apart from the initial hemorrhage severity, secondary brain injury due to early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia plays a leading role in patient outcome after SAH. While many strategies to combat secondary brain injury have been developed in preclinical studies and tested in late phase clinical trials, only one (nimodipine) has proven efficacious for improving long-term functional outcome. The causes of these failures are likely multitude, but include use of therapies targeting only one element of what has proven to be multifactorial brain injury process. Conditioning is a therapeutic strategy that leverages endogenous protective mechanisms to exert powerful and remarkably pleiotropic protective effects against injury to all major cell types of the CNS. The aim of this article is to review the current body of evidence for the use of conditioning agents in SAH, summarize the underlying neuroprotective mechanisms, and identify gaps in the current literature to guide future investigation with the long-term goal of identifying a conditioning-based therapeutic that significantly improves functional and cognitive outcomes for SAH patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: To examine the association between external ventricular drain (EVD) placement, critical care utilization, complications, and clinical outcomes in hospitalized adults with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)., Methods: A single-center retrospective study included SAH patients 18 years and older, admitted between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2022. The exposure variable was EVD. The primary outcomes of interest were (1) early mortality (<72 h), (2) overall mortality, (3) improvement in modified-World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (m-WFNSs) grade between admission and discharge, and (4) discharge to home at the end of the hospital stay. We adjusted for admission m-WFNS grade, age, sex, race/ethnicity, intraventricular hemorrhage, aneurysmal cause of SAH, mechanical ventilation, critical care utilization, and complications within a multivariable analysis. We reported adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: The study sample included 1346 patients: 18% (n = 243) were between the ages of 18 and 44 years, 48% (n = 645) were between the age of 45-64 years, and 34% (n = 458) were 65 years and older, with other statistics of females (56%, n = 756), m-WFNS I-III (57%, n = 762), m-WFNS IV-V (43%, n = 584), 51% mechanically ventilated, 76% White (n = 680), and 86% English-speaking (n = 1158). Early mortality occurred in 11% (n = 142). Overall mortality was 21% (n = 278), 53% (n = 707) were discharged to their home, and 25% (n = 331) improved their m-WFNS between admission and discharge. Altogether, 54% (n = 731) received EVD placement. After adjusting for covariates, the results of the multivariable analysis demonstrated that EVD placement was associated with reduced early mortality (aOR 0.21 [0.14, 0.33]), an improvement in m-WFNS grade (aOR 2.06 [1.42, 2.99]) but not associated with overall mortality (aOR 0.69 [0.47, 1.00]) or being discharged home at the end of the hospital stay (aOR 1.00 [0.74, 1.36]). EVD was associated with a higher rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (aOR 2.32 [1.03, 5.23]), delirium (aOR 1.56 [1.05, 2.32]), and a longer ICU (aOR 1.33 [1.29;1.36]) and hospital length of stay (aOR 1.09 [1.07;1.10]). Critical care utilization was also higher in patients with EVD compared to those without., Conclusions: The study suggests that EVD placement in hospitalized adults with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with reduced early mortality and improved neurological recovery, albeit with higher critical care utilization and complications. These findings emphasize the potential clinical benefits of EVD placement in managing SAH. However, further research and prospective studies may be necessary to validate these results and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing clinical outcomes in SAH.

Background and Objectives : We analyzed delirium testing, delirium prevalence, critical care associations outcomes at the time of hospital discharge in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), non-traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to an intensive care unit. Materials and Methods : We examined the frequency of assessment for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit. We assessed delirium testing frequency, associated factors, positive test outcomes, and their correlations with clinical care, including nonpharmacological interventions and pain, agitation, and distress management. Results : Amongst 11,322 patients with ABI, delirium was tested in 8220 (726%). Compared to patients 18-44 years of age, patients 65-79 years (aOR 0.79 [0.69, 0.90]), and those 80 years and older (aOR 0.58 [0.50, 0.68]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Compared to English-speaking patients, non-English-speaking patients (aOR 0.73 [0.64, 0.84]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Amongst 8220, 2217 (27.2%) tested positive for delirium. For every day in the ICU, the odds of testing positive for delirium increased by 1.11 [0.10, 0.12]. Delirium was highest in those 80 years and older (aOR 3.18 [2.59, 3.90]). Delirium was associated with critical care resource utilization and with significant odds of mortality (aOR 7.26 [6.07, 8.70] at the time of hospital discharge. Conclusions : In conclusion, we find that seven out of ten patients in the neurocritical care unit are tested for delirium, and approximately two out of every five patients test positive for delirium. We demonstrate disparities in delirium testing by age and preferred language, identified high-risk subgroups, and the association between delirium, critical care resource use, complications, discharge GCS, and disposition. Prioritizing equitable testing and diagnosis, especially for elderly and non-English-speaking patients, is crucial for delivering quality care to this vulnerable group.

Background Managing neurocritical care patients encompasses many complex challenges, necessitating specialized care and continuous quality improvement efforts. In recent years, the focus on enhancing patient outcomes in neurocritical care may have led to the development of dedicated quality improvement programs. These programs are designed to systematically evaluate and refine care practices, aligning them with the latest clinical guidelines and research findings. Objective To describe the structure, processes, and outcomes of a dedicated Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Program (NCC-QIP) at Harborview Medical Center, United States; a quaternary academic medical center, level I trauma, and a comprehensive stroke center. Materials and methods We describe the development of the NCC-QIP, its structure, function, challenges, and evolution. We examine our performance with several NCC-QI quality measures as proposed by the Joint Commission, the American Association of Neurology, and the Neurocritical Care Society, self-reported quality improvement (QI) concerns and QI initiatives undertaken because of the information obtained during our event/measure reporting process for patients admitted between 1/1/2014 and 06/30/2023. Results The NCC-QI reviewed data from 20,218 patients; mean age 57.9 (standard deviation 18.1) years, 56% (n=11,326) males, with acute ischemic stroke (AIS; 22.3%, n=4506), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH; 14.8%, n=2,996), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; 8.9%, n=1804), and traumatic brain injury (TBI; 16.6%, n=3352) among other admissions, 37.4% (n=7,559) were mechanically ventilated, and 13.6% (n=2,753) received an intracranial pressure monitor. The median intensive care unit length of stay was two days (Quartile 1-Quartile 3: 2-5 days), and the median hospital length of stay was seven days (Quartile 1-Quartile 3: 3-14 days); 53.9% (n=10,907) were discharged home while 11.4% (2,309) died. The three most commonly reported QI concerns were related to care coordination/communication/handoff (40.4%, n=283), medication-related concerns (14.9%, n=104), and equipment/devices-related concerns (11.7%, n=82). Hospital-acquired infections were in the form of ventilator-associated pneumonia (16.3%, n=419/2562), ventriculostomy catheter-associated infections (4%, n=102/2246), and deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (3.2%, n=647). The quality metrics documentation was as follows: nimodipine after SAH (99.8%, 1802/1810), Hunt and Hess score (36%, n=650/1804), and ICH score (58.4% n=1752/2996). In comparison, 72% (n=3244/4506) of patients with AIS had a documented National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. Admission Glasgow Coma Score was recorded in 99% of patients with SAH, ICH, and TBI. Educational modules were implemented in response to event reporting. Conclusion A dedicated NCC-QIP can be successfully implemented at a quaternary medical medical center. It is possible to monitor and review a large volume of neurocritical care patients, The three most reported NCC-QI concerns may be related to care coordination-communication/handoff, medication-related concerns, and equipment/devices-related complications. The documentation of illness severity scores and stroke measures depends upon the type of measure and ability to reliably and accurately abstract and can be challenging. The quality improvement process can be enhanced by educational modules that reinforce quality and safety., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2024, Lele et al.)

Objective: To describe patients, perioperative care, and outcomes undergoing supratentorial and infratentorial craniotomy for brain tumor resection in a tertiary-care hospital in Ethiopia., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients consecutively admitted between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021, was performed. We characterized patients, perioperative care, and outcomes., Results: The final sample comprised 153 patients; 144 (94%) were 18 years and over, females (n = 48, 55%) with primarily American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class II (n = 97, 63.4%) who underwent supratentorial (n = 114, 75%), or infratentorial (n = 39, 25%) tumor resection. Patients were routinely admitted (95%) to floor/wards before craniotomy; Inhaled anesthetic (isoflurane 88%/halothane 12%) was used for maintenance of general anesthesia. Propofol (n = 93, 61%), mannitol (n = 73, 48%), and cerebrospinal fluid drain (n = 28, 18%), were used to facilitate intraoperative brain relaxation, while the use of hyperventilation was rare (n = 1). The average estimated blood loss was 1040 ± 727 ml; 37 (24%) patients received tranexamic acid, and 57 (37%) received a blood transfusion. Factors associated with extubation were a) infratentorial tumor location: relative risk (RR) 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.69), preoperative hydrocephalus: RR 0.51, (95% CI 0.34-0.79), shorter total anesthesia duration: 277.8 + 8.8 versus 426.77 + 13.1 minutes, P < 0.0001, lower estimated blood loss: 897 + 68 ml versus 1361.7 + 100 ml, P = 0.0002, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage to facilitate brain relaxation: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84). Approximately one in ten patients experienced postoperative obstructive hydrocephalus, surgical site infections, or pneumonia., Conclusions: These findings suggest that certain factors may impact patient outcomes following craniotomy for tumor resection. By identifying these factors, health care providers may be better equipped to develop individualized treatment plans and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of postoperative monitoring and management to prevent complications., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We tested the ability of chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence chatbot, to answer questions relevant to scenarios covered in 3 clinical guidelines, published by the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC), which has published management guidelines: endovascular treatment of stroke, perioperative stroke (Stroke), and care of patients undergoing complex spine surgery (Spine)., Methods: Four neuroanesthesiologists independently assessed whether ChatGPT could apply 52 high-quality recommendations (HQRs) included in the 3 SNACC guidelines. HQRs were deemed present in the ChatGPT responses if noted by at least 3 of the 4 reviewers. Reviewers also identified incorrect references, potentially harmful recommendations, and whether ChatGPT cited the SNACC guidelines., Results: The overall reviewer agreement for the presence of HQRs in the ChatGPT answers ranged from 0% to 100%. Only 4 of 52 (8%) HQRs were deemed present by at least 3 of the 4 reviewers after 5 generic questions, and 23 (44%) HQRs were deemed present after at least 1 additional targeted question. Potentially harmful recommendations were identified for each of the 3 clinical scenarios and ChatGPT failed to cite the SNACC guidelines., Conclusions: The ChatGPT answers were open to human interpretation regarding whether the responses included the HQRs. Though targeted questions resulted in the inclusion of more HQRs than generic questions, fewer than 50% of HQRs were noted even after targeted questions. This suggests that ChatGPT should not currently be considered a reliable source of information for clinical decision-making. Future iterations of ChatGPT may refine algorithms to improve its reliability as a source of clinical information., Competing Interests: A.V.L. reports salary support from Life Center Northwest. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hemodynamic instability and myocardial dysfunction are major factors preventing the transplantation of hearts from organ donors after brain death. Intravenous levothyroxine is widely used in donor care, on the basis of observational data suggesting that more organs may be transplanted from donors who receive hormonal supplementation., Methods: In this trial involving 15 organ-procurement organizations in the United States, we randomly assigned hemodynamically unstable potential heart donors within 24 hours after declaration of death according to neurologic criteria to open-label infusion of intravenous levothyroxine (30 μg per hour for a minimum of 12 hours) or saline placebo. The primary outcome was transplantation of the donor heart; graft survival at 30 days after transplantation was a prespecified recipient safety outcome. Secondary outcomes included weaning from vasopressor therapy, donor ejection fraction, and number of organs transplanted per donor., Results: Of the 852 brain-dead donors who underwent randomization, 838 were included in the primary analysis: 419 in the levothyroxine group and 419 in the saline group. Hearts were transplanted from 230 donors (54.9%) in the levothyroxine group and 223 (53.2%) in the saline group (adjusted risk ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.07; P = 0.57). Graft survival at 30 days occurred in 224 hearts (97.4%) transplanted from donors assigned to receive levothyroxine and 213 hearts (95.5%) transplanted from donors assigned to receive saline (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.3 to 6.0; P<0.001 for noninferiority at a margin of 6 percentage points). There were no substantial between-group differences in weaning from vasopressor therapy, ejection fraction on echocardiography, or organs transplanted per donor, but more cases of severe hypertension and tachycardia occurred in the levothyroxine group than in the saline group., Conclusions: In hemodynamically unstable brain-dead potential heart donors, intravenous levothyroxine infusion did not result in significantly more hearts being transplanted than saline infusion. (Funded by Mid-America Transplant and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04415658.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Myocardial injury and cardiac dysfunction after traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been reported in observational studies, but there is no robust estimate of their incidences. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled incidence of myocardial injury and cardiac dysfunction among adult patients with TBI. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to November 2022. Observational studies were included if they reported at least one abnormal electrocardiographic finding, elevated cardiac troponin level, or echocardiographic evaluation of systolic function or left ventricular wall motion in adult patients with TBI. Myocardial injury was defined as elevated cardiac troponin level according to the original studies and cardiac dysfunction was defined as the presence of left ventricular ejection fraction <50% or regional wall motion abnormalities assessed by echocardiography. The meta-analysis of the pooled incidence of myocardial injury and cardiac dysfunction was performed using random-effect models. The pooled estimated incidence of myocardial injury after TBI (17 studies, 3,773 participants) was 33% (95% CI: 27%-39%, I2:s 93%), and the pooled estimated incidence of cardiac dysfunction after TBI (9 studies, 557 participants) was 16.% (95% CI: 9%-25.%, I2: 84%). Although there was significant heterogeneity between studies and potential overestimation of the incidence of myocardial injury and cardiac dysfunction, our findings suggest that myocardial injury occurs in approximately one-third of adults after TBI, and cardiac dysfunction occurs in approximately one-sixth of patients with TBI., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) plays a vital role in maintaining cerebral blood flow in response to changes in systemic blood pressure. Impairment of CA following traumatic brain injury (TBI) may exacerbate the injury, potentially impacting patient outcomes. This focused review addresses 4 key questions regarding the measurement, natural history of CA after TBI, and potential clinical implications of CA status and CA-guided management in adults and children with TBI. We examine the feasibility and safety of CA assessment, its association with clinical outcomes, and the potential for reversing deranged CA following TBI. Finally, we discuss how the knowledge of CA status may affect TBI management and outcomes., Competing Interests: A.V.L. reports salary support as Medical Advisor for LifeCenter Northwest. M.S.V. has no conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cerebral autoregulation impairment is a critical aspect of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-induced secondary brain injury and is also shown to be an independent predictor of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and poor neurologic outcomes. Interestingly, intraoperative hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters were shown to influence patient outcomes after SAH. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the association of intraoperative hypotension and hypocapnia with the occurrence of angiographic vasospasm, DCI, and neurologic outcomes at discharge. Intraoperative data were collected for 390 patients with aneurysmal SAH who underwent general anesthesia for aneurysm clipping or coiling between January 2010 and May 2018. We measured the mean intraoperative blood pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ), as well as the area under the curve (AUC) for the burden of hypotension: SBP below 100 or MBP below 65 and hypocapnia (ETCO 2 < 30), during the intraoperative period. The outcome measures were angiographic vasospasm, DCI, and the neurologic outcomes at discharge as measured by the modified Rankin scale score (an mRS of 0-2 is a good outcome, and 3-6 is a poor outcome). Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate whether blood pressure (BP) and ETCO 2 variables were independently associated with outcome measures. Out of 390 patients, 132 (34%) developed moderate-to-severe vasospasm, 114 (29%) developed DCI, and 46% (169) had good neurologic outcomes at discharge. None of the measured intraoperative BP and ETCO 2 variables were associated with angiographic vasospasm, DCI, or poor neurologic outcomes. Our study did not identify an independent association between the degree of intraoperative hypotension or hypocapnia in relation to angiographic vasospasm, DCI, or the neurologic outcomes at discharge in SAH patients.

Background: To describe the setting, feasibility, and safety of static cerebral autoregulation testing in critically injured adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).  Methods: We reviewed static autoregulation testing using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound in patients > 18 years with TBI ICD codes between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021. Adverse events during testing were defined as systemic hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP>180 mmHg), bradycardia (HR<40 bpm), and high ICP (>30 mmHg). Impaired and absent cerebral autoregulation was defined as an autoregulatory index (ARI) <0.4 and ARI 0, respectively. We characterized prescribed changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets by autoregulation testing results.  Results: A total of 135 patients, median age 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 24, 43) years, 71.9% male, admission Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score 3 (IQR 3, 5.5), and 70.9% with subdural hematoma from severe (GCS 3-8; 133 (98.5%)) and moderate (GCS 9-12; 2 (1.5%)) TBI, underwent 309 attempted testing. All patients were mechanically ventilated and had ICP monitoring; 246 (80%) had brain tissue oxygen monitoring, and 68 (22%) had an external ventricular drain. The median number of autoregulation tests was two (range 1-3) tests/patient, and the median admission to the first test time was two days (IQR 1, 3). Of 55 (17.8%) tests not completed, systemic hypertension (32, 10.4%), intracranial hypertension (10, 3.2%), and bradycardia (3, 0.9%) were transient. Fifty-three (51%) of the first (n=104) autoregulation tests showed impaired/absent cerebral autoregulation. Impaired/absent autoregulation results at the first test were associated with repeat cerebral autoregulation testing (RR 2.25, 95% CI [1.40-3.60], p=0.0007) than intact cerebral autoregulation results. Pre-testing cerebral hemodynamic targets were maintained (n=131; 86.8%) when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (n=151; RR 1.49, 95% CI [1.25-1.77], p<0.0001). However, 15 (9.9%) test results led to higher ICP targets (from 20 mmHg to 25 mmHg), 5 (3.3%) results led to an increase in CPP target (from 60 mmHg to 70 mmHg), and five out of 131 (3.8%) patients underwent decompressive craniectomy and placement of an external ventricular drain. Intact cerebral autoregulation results (n=43/103, 41.7%) were associated with a change in ICP targets from 20 mmHg to 25 mmHg (RR 3.15, 95% CI [1.97-5.03], p<0.0001).  Conclusions: Static cerebral autoregulation testing was feasible, safe, and useful in individualizing the care of patients with moderate-severe TBI receiving multimodal neuromonitoring. Testing results guided future testing, cerebral hemodynamic targets, and procedural decisions. Impaired cerebral autoregulation was very common., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Kunapaisal et al.)

Background: We asked whether patients >50 years of age with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) present with lower platelet counts and whether lower platelet counts are independently associated with mortality., Methods: We combined trauma registry and laboratory data on a retrospective cohort of all patients ≥18 years of age admitted to our Level 1 US regional trauma center 2015-2021 with severe (Head Abbreviated Injury Score [AIS] ≥3), isolated (all other AIS <3) TBI who had a first platelet count within 1 h of arrival. Age and platelet count were assessed continuously and as groups (age 18-50 vs. >50, platelet normals, and at conventional transfusion thresholds). Outcomes such as mean admission platelet counts and in-hospital mortality were assessed categorically and with logistic regression., Results: Of 44,056 patients, 1298 (3%, median age: 52 [IQR 33,68], 76.1% male) met all inclusion criteria with no differences between younger and older age groups for (ISS; 18 [14,26] vs. 17 [14,26], p = .22), New ISS (NISS; 29 [19,50] vs. 28 [17,50], p = .36), or AIS-Head (4 [3,5] vs. 4 [3,5]; p = .87). Patients aged >50 had lower admission platelet counts (219,000 ± 93,000 vs. 242,000 ± 76,000/μL; p < .001) and greater in-hospital mortality (24.5% vs. 15.6%, p < .001) than those 18-50. In multivariable regression, firearms injuries (OR9.08), increasing age (OR1.004), NISS (OR1.007), and AIS-Head (OR1.05), and decreasing admission platelet counts (OR0.998) were independently associated with mortality (p < .001-.041). Platelet transfusion in the first 4 h of care was more frequent among older patients (p < .001)., Conclusions: Older patients with TBI had lower admission platelet counts, which were independently associated with greater mortality., (© 2023 AABB.)

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine the association with in-hospital mortality of 8 illness severity scores in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH)., Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we investigated the association with in-hospital mortality of admission Hunt and Hess (HH) score, Fisher grade, severity of illness and risk of mortality scores, and serial Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score in patients with aSAH. We also explored the changes in GCS between admission and discharge using a multivariate model adjusting for age, clinical vasospasm, and external ventricular drain status., Results: Data from 480 patients with aSAH, of which 383 (79.8%) aneurysms were in the anterior circulation, were included in analysis. Patients were female (n=340, 70.8%) with a median age of 56 (interquartile range: 48 to 66) years. The majority (n=332, 69.2%) had admission HH score 3 to 5, Fisher grade 3 to 4 (n=437, 91%), median severity of illness 3 (range: 1 to 4), median risk of mortality 3 (range: 1 to 4), and median admission GCS of 13 (interquartile range: 7 to 15). Overall, 406 (84.6%) patients received an external ventricular drain, 469 (97.7%) underwent aneurysm repair, and 60 died (12.5%). Compared with admission HH score, GCS 24 hours after admission (area under the curve: 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.88) and 24 hours after aneurysm repair (area under the curve: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.90) were more likely to be associated with in-hospital mortality. Among those who died, the greatest decline in GCS was noted between 24 hours after aneurysm repair and discharge (-3.38 points, 95% CI: -4.17, -2.58)., Conclusions: Compared with admission HH score, GCS 24 hours after admission (or 24 h after aneurysm repair) is more likely to be associated with in-hospital mortality after aSAH., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

We examined the associations between the Neurological Pupillary Index (NPi) and disposition at hospital discharge in patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary outcome was discharge disposition (home/acute rehabilitation vs. death/hospice/skilled nursing facility). Secondary outcomes were tracheostomy tube placement and transition to comfort measures. Among 2258 patients who received serial NPi assessments within the first seven days of ICU admission, 47.7% (n = 1078) demonstrated NPi ≥ 3 on initial and final assessments, 30.1% (n = 680) had initial NPI < 3 that never improved, 19% (n = 430) had initial NPi ≥ 3, which subsequently worsened to <3 and never recovered, and 3.1% (n = 70) had initial NPi < 3, which improved to ≥3. After adjusting for age, sex, admitting diagnosis, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, craniotomy/craniectomy, and hyperosmolar therapy, NPi values that remained <3 or worsened from ≥3 to <3 were associated with poor outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.58, 95% CI [2.03; 3.28]), placement of a tracheostomy tube (aOR 1.58, 95% CI [1.13; 2.22]), and transition to comfort measures only (aOR 2.12, 95% CI [1.67; 2.70]). Our study suggests that serial NPi assessments during the first seven days of ICU admission may be helpful in predicting outcomes and guiding clinical decision-making in patients with ABI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of interventions to improve NPi trends in this population.

Sedation is an essential component of the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) procedure for patient comfort. The use and the clinical implications of cardiologist-supervised (CARD-Sed) versus anesthesiologist-supervised sedation (ANES-Sed) are unknown. We reviewed nonoperative TEE records from a single academic center over a 5-year period and identified CARD-Sed and ANES-Sed cases. We evaluated the impact of patient co-morbidities, cardiac abnormalities on transthoracic echocardiogram, and the indication for TEE on sedation practice. We analyzed the use of CARD-Sed versus ANES-Sed in light of institutional guidelines; the consistency in the documentation of preprocedural risk stratification; and the incidence of cardiopulmonary events, including hypotension, hypoxia, and hypercarbia. A total of 914 patients underwent TEE, with 475 patients (52%) receiving CARD-Sed and 439 patients (48%) receiving ANES-Sed. The presence of obstructive sleep apnea (p = 0.008), a body mass index of >45 kg/m 2 (p <0.001), an ejection fraction of <30% (p <0.001), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure of more than 40 mm Hg (p = 0.015) were all associated with the use of ANES-Sed. Of the 178 patients (19.5%) with at least 1 caution to nonanesthesiologist-supervised sedation by the institutional screening guideline, 65 patients (36.5%) underwent CARD-Sed. In the ANES-Sed group, where intraprocedural vital signs and medications were documented in all cases, hypotension (n = 91, 20.7%), vasoactive medication use (n = 121, 27.6%), hypoxia (n = 35, 8.0%), and hypercarbia (n = 50, 11.4%) were noted. This single-center study revealed that 48% of the nonoperative TEE used ANES-Sed over 5 years. Sedation-related hemodynamic changes and respiratory events were not infrequently encountered during ANES-Sed., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An electronic survey was administered to multidisciplinary neurocritical care providers at 365 hospitals in 32 countries to describe intrahospital transport (IHT) practices of neurocritically ill patients at their institutions. The reported IHT practices were stratified by World Bank country income level. Variability between high-income (HIC) and low/middle-income (LMIC) groups, as well as variability between hospitals within countries, were expressed as counts/percentages and intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 246 hospitals (67% response rate; n = 103, 42% HIC and n = 143, 58% LMIC) participated. LMIC hospitals were less likely to report a portable CT scanner (RR 0.39, 95% CI [0.23; 0.67]), more likely to report a pre-IHT checklist (RR 2.18, 95% CI [1.53; 3.11]), and more likely to report that intensive care unit (ICU) physicians routinely participated in IHTs (RR 1.33, 95% CI [1.02; 1.72]). Between- and across-country variation were highest for pre-IHT external ventricular drain clamp tolerance (reported by 40% of the hospitals, ICC 0.22, 95% CI 0.00-0.46) and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during IHT (reported by 29% of the hospitals, ICC 0.46, 95% CI 0.07-0.71). Brain tissue oxygenation monitoring during IHT was reported by only 9% of the participating hospitals. An IHT standard operating procedure (SOP)/hospital policy (HP) was reported by 37% ( n = 90); HIC: 43% ( n = 44) vs. LMIC: 32% ( n = 46), p = 0.56. Amongst the IHT SOP/HPs reviewed ( n = 13), 90% did not address the continuation of hemodynamic and neurophysiological monitoring during IHT. In conclusion, the development of a neurocritical-care-specific IHT SOP/HP as well as the alignment of practices related to the IHT of neurocritically ill patients are urgent unmet needs. Inconsistent standards related to neurophysiological monitoring during IHT warrant in-depth scrutiny across hospitals and suggest a need for international guidelines for neurocritical care IHT.

Objective To describe Harborview Medical Center's experience with the involvement of caseworker cultural mediators (CCM) for patients requiring neurocritical care. Methods Using univariate and multivariate analysis (model adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Scores, mechanical ventilation, transition to comfort measures only (CMO), and death by neurologic criteria), we examined CCM team members' involvement in the care of Amharic/Cambodian/Khmer/Somali/Spanish/Vietnamese patients admitted to our neurocritical care service between 2014-2022, factors associated with CCM utilization, and changes in CCM utilization after a QI initiative was implemented in 2020 to encourage healthcare providers to consult the CCM team. Results Compared to eligible patients (n=827) who did not receive CCM referral, patients with CCM involvement (n=121) were younger (49 [interquartile range, IQR 38,63] vs. 56 [IQR 42,68] years, p = 0.002), had greater illness severity (admission GCS 8.5 [IQR 3,14] vs. 14 [IQR 7,15], p < 0.001, SOFA scores (5 [IQR 2,8] vs. 4 [IQR2,6], p = 0.007), and more frequently required mechanical ventilation (67% vs. 40%, odds ratio, OR 3.07, 95% CI 2.06,4.64), with higher all-cause mortality (20% vs. 12%, RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09, 2.95), and with a higher rate of transition to CMO (11.6% vs. 6.2%, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03;3.66). The CCM QI initiative was independently associated with increased CCM involvement (aOR 4.22, 95% CI [2.32;7.66]). Overall, 4/10 attempts made by CCMs to reach out to the family to provide support were declined by the family. CCMs reported providing cultural/emotional support (n=96, 79%), end-of-life counseling (n=16, 13%), conflict mediation (n=15, 12.4%), and facilitating goals of care meetings (n=4, 3.3%). Conclusions Among eligible patients, CCM consultations appeared to occur in patients with higher disease severity. Our QI initiative increased CCM involvement., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2023, Lele et al.)

Background: An external ventricular drain (EVD) training module may improve the knowledge and proficiency of perioperative health care providers (HCPs)., Methods: We examined knowledge gaps, self-reported comfort in managing EVDs, and improvement in self-assessment scores among HCPs from 7 academic medical centers based on an online EVD training module., Results: Of the 326 HCPs who completed the module, 207 (70.6%) reported being uncomfortable managing EVDs. The median pretest scores were 6 (interquartile range=2), and posttest scores were 8 (interquartile range=1), out of a maximum possible score of 9. The most frequent incorrectly answered questions were: (a) maximum allowed hourly cerebrospinal fluid volume drainage (51%), (b) the components of a normal intracranial pressure waveform (41%), and (c) identifying the correct position of the stopcock for accurate measurement of intracranial pressure (41%). The overall gain in scores was 2 (interquartile range=2) and highest among HCPs who had managed 1 to 25 EVDs (2.51, 95% confidence interval: 2.23-2.80), and without self-reported comfort in managing EVDs (2.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.96-2.33, P <0.0001). The majority of participants (312, 95.7%) reported that the training module helped them understand how to manage EVDs, and 276 (84.7%) rated the module 8 or more out of 10 in recommending it to their colleagues., Conclusions: This online EVD training module was well-received by participants. Overall, improved scores reflect enhanced knowledge among HCPs following completion of the module. The greatest benefit was observed in those reporting less experience and feeling uncomfortable in managing EVDs. The impact on the reduction in EVD-associated adverse events deserves further examination., Competing Interests: A.V.L. receives salary support from LifeCenter Northwest and reports past research support from Aqueduct Critical Care. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. We describe our experience with VTE prophylaxis and treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), risk factors for VTE, and a hazard model describing the daily risk of VTE., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with aSAH admitted from 2014 to 2018. Patients were screened for VTE based on clinical suspicion. Demographics, perioperative data, and in-hospital data were assessed as risk factors for VTE using survival analysis with death as a competing risk., Results: Among 485 patients, the overall incidence of VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism were 5.6%, 4.3%, and 2.3%, respectively. Increasing length of stay in the intensive care unit (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-2.16) and ventilation immediately after aneurysm treatment was associated with VTE (HR, 8.87; P < 0.01; 95% CI, 1.86-42.38). Hunt and Hess grade was negatively associated with VTE (HR, 0.61; P = 0.045; 95% CI, 0.37-1.00) due to its increased association with the competing risk of death (HR, 2.57; P < 0.0001; 95% CI, 1.89-3.49). The adjusted 4-year cumulative incidence for VTE is 11.1% and at mean day of hospital discharge is 5.4%. Treatment of VTEs with anticoagulation and/or inferior vena cava filter placement was not associated with immediate complications., Conclusions: We describe the largest single-institution cohort of VTEs in aSAH patients. Our hazard model quantifies the cumulative incidence of VTEs during the course of hospitalization. We suggest a standardized protocol for screening, prophylaxis, and treatment of VTEs in this patient population., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Acute coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection usually results in mild symptoms, but secondary infections after SARS-CoV-2 infection can occur, particularly with comorbid conditions. We present the clinical course of a healthy adolescent with a brain abscess and life-threatening intracranial hypertension requiring emergent decompressive craniectomy after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 13-year-old healthy immunized male presented with invasive frontal, ethmoid, and maxillary sinusitis and symptoms of lethargy, nausea, headache, and photophobia due to a frontal brain abscess diagnosed three weeks after symptoms and 11 days of oral amoxicillin treatment. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was negative twice but then positive on amoxicillin day 11 (symptom day 21), when magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 2.5-cm right frontal brain abscess with a 10-mm midline shift. The patient underwent emergent craniotomy for right frontal epidural abscess washout and functional endoscopic sinus surgery with ethmoidectomy. On a postoperative day one, his neurological condition showed new right-sided pupillary dilation and decreased responsiveness. His vital signs showed bradycardia and systolic hypertension. He underwent an emergent decompressive craniectomy for signs of brain herniation. Bacterial PCR was positive for Streptococcus intermedius , for which he received intravenous vancomycin and metronidazole. He was discharged home on hospital day 14 without neurological sequelae and future bone flap replacement. Our case highlights the importance of timely recognition and treatment of brain abscess and brain herniation in patients with neurological symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in otherwise healthy patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Kunapaisal et al.)

Objective: To report our institutional experience with implementing a clinical cerebral autoregulation testing order set with protocol in children hospitalized with traumatic brain injury (TBI)., Methods: After IRB approval, we examined clinical use, patient characteristics, feasibility, and safety of cerebral autoregulation testing in children aged <18 years between 2014 and 2021. A clinical order set with a protocol for cerebral autoregulation testing was introduced in 2018., Results: 25 (24 severe TBI and 1 mild TBI) children, median age 13 years [IQR 4.5; 15] and median admission GCS 3[IQR 3; 3.5]) underwent 61 cerebral autoregulation tests during the first 16 days after admission [IQR1.5; 7; range 0-16]. Testing was more common after implementation of the order set ( n  = 16, 64% after the order set vs. n  = 9, 36% before the order set) and initiated during the first 2 days. During testing, patients were mechanically ventilated ( n  = 60, 98.4%), had invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring ( n  = 60, 98.4%), had intracranial pressure monitoring ( n  = 56, 90.3%), brain-tissue oxygenation monitoring ( n  = 56, 90.3%), and external ventricular drain ( n  = 13, 25.5%). Most patients received sedation and analgesia for intracranial pressure control ( n  = 52; 83.8%) and vasoactive support ( n  = 55, 90.2%) during testing. Cerebral autoregulation testing was completed in 82% ( n  = 50 tests); 11 tests were not completed [high intracranial pressure ( n  = 5), high blood pressure ( n  = 2), bradycardia ( n  = 2), low cerebral perfusion pressure ( n  = 1), or intolerance to blood pressure cuff inflation ( n  = 1)]. Impaired cerebral autoregulation on first assessment resulted in repeat testing (80% impaired vs. 23% intact, RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.06:8.08, p  = 0.03). Seven out of 50 tests (14%) resulted in a change in cerebral hemodynamic targets., Conclusion: Findings from this series of children with TBI indicate that: (1) Availability of clinical order set with protocol facilitated clinical cerebral autoregulation testing, (2) Clinicians ordered cerebral autoregulation tests in children with severe TBI receiving high therapeutic intensity and repeatedly with impaired status on the first test, (3) Clinical cerebral autoregulation testing is feasible and safe, and (4) Testing results led to change in hemodynamic targets in some patients., Competing Interests: AL receives salary support from LifeCenter Northwest, which is not relevant to the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Kunapaisal, Moore, Theard, King, Chesnut, Vavilala and Lele.)

Background and objective: There is no report of the rate of opioid prescription at the time of hospital discharge, which may be associated with various patient and procedure-related factors. This study examined the prevalence and factors associated with prescribing opioids for head/neck pain after elective craniotomy for tumor resection/vascular repair. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on adults undergoing elective craniotomy for tumor resection/vascular repair at a large quaternary-care hospital. We used univariable and multivariable analysis to examine the prevalence and factors (pre-operative, intraoperative, and postoperative) associated with prescribing opioids at the time of hospital discharge. We also examined the factors associated with discharge oral morphine equivalent use. Results: The study sample comprised 273 patients with a median age of 54 years [IQR 41,65], 173 females (63%), 174 (63.7%) tumor resections, and 99 (36.2%) vascular repairs. The majority (n = 264, 96.7%) received opioids postoperatively. The opiate prescription rates were 72% (n = 196/273) at hospital discharge, 23% (19/83) at neurosurgical clinical visits within 30 days of the procedure, and 2.4% (2/83) after 30 days from the procedure. The median oral morphine equivalent (OME) at discharge use was 300 [IQR 175,600]. Patients were discharged with a median supply of 5 days [IQR 3,7]. On multivariable analysis, opioid prescription at hospital discharge was associated with pre-existent chronic pain (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.87 [1.06,3.29], p = 0.03) and time from surgery to hospital discharge (compared to patients discharged within days 1−4 postoperatively, patients discharged between days 5−12 (aOR 0.3, 95% CI [0.15; 0.59], p = 0.0005), discharged at 12 days and later (aOR 0.17, 95% CI [0.07; 0.39], p < 0.001)). There was a linear relationship between the first 24 h OME (p < 0.001), daily OME (p < 0.001), hospital OME (p < 0.001), and discharge OME. Conclusions: This single-center study finds that at the time of hospital discharge, opioids are prescribed for head/neck pain in as many as seven out of ten patients after elective craniotomy. A history of chronic pain and time from surgery to discharge may be associated with opiate prescriptions. Discharge OME may be associated with first 24-h, daily OME, and hospital OME use. Findings need further evaluation in a large multicenter sample. The findings are important to consider as there is growing interest in an early discharge after elective craniotomy.

To investigate the pandemic's impact on critically ill patients with neurological emergencies, we compared care metrics and outcomes of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) before and during the initial COVID-19 surge at our institution. We included adult patients with SABI during two separate three-month time periods: 'pre-COVID vs COVID'. We further stratified the COVID cohort to characterize outcomes in patients requiring COVID-19 precautions (Patient Under Investigation, 'PUI'). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality; secondary endpoints included length of stay (LOS), diagnostic studies performed, time to emergent decompressive craniectomies (DCHC), ventilator management, and end-of-life care. We included 394 patients and found the overall number of admissions for SABI declined by 29 % during COVID (pre-COVID n = 231 vs COVID, n = 163). Our primary outcome of mortality and most secondary outcomes were similar between study periods. There were more frequent extubation attempts (72.1 % vs 76 %) and the mean time to extubation was shorter during COVID (55.5 h vs 38.2 h). The ICU LOS (6.10 days vs 4.69 days) and hospital LOS (15.32 days vs 11.74 days) was shorter during COVID. More PUIs died than non-PUIs (51.7 % vs 11.2 %), but when adjusted for markers of illness severity, this was not significant. We demonstrate the ability to maintain a consistent care delivery for patients with SABI during the pandemic at our institution. PUIs represent a population with higher illness severity at risk for delays in care. Multicenter, longitudinal studies are needed to explore the impact of the pandemic on patients with acute neurological emergencies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Claire Creutzfeldt has received research support from the NINDS (K23 NS099421). Abhijit Lele receives ongoing salary support from LifeCenter Northwest. Sarah Livesay receives consulting fees via Stroke Challenges through Lombardi Hill. Sherry Chou has received research support from the NIH (UL1 TR001857, R21NS113037) and University of Pittsburgh Dean’s Faculty Achievement Award as well as has a leadership role in the Neurocritical Care Society. Robert Bonow received in-kind research support from Butterfly Network. The remaining authors have no relevant financial disclosures or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)