Search

Background: Defining the optimum regimen and time for repeat peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization would have important clinical applications.Study Design and Methods: Remobilization with SCF and G-CSF at 2 weeks after an initial mobilization in mice and at 2 or 4 weeks after an initial mobilization in nonhuman primates was examined. In mice, competitive repopulation assays were used to measure long-term progenitor cell-repopulating activity. In monkeys, mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor CFUs was used as a surrogate marker for progenitor cell-repopulating ability.Results: Efficacy of progenitor cell remobilization differed in the two animal species. In mice, peripheral blood progenitor cell-repopulating ability with repeat mobilization at 2 weeks was 70 percent of that with the initial mobilization. In monkeys, there was no significant difference in peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization between the initial and the repeat mobilizations at 2 weeks. In mobilizations separated by 4 weeks, however, peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization was higher than that with initial mobilizations.Conclusion: In animal models, mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with remobilization after a 2-week interval is similar to or moderately decreased from that with the initial mobilization. Progenitor cell collection at this time point may be useful in certain clinical circumstances. A 4-week interval between remobilizations may be preferable. Clinical trials in humans would be useful to clarify these issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: G-CSF with or without dexamethasone is becoming the standard agent for mobilizing granulocytes for transfusion. The purpose of this study was to determine if the toxicities of G--CSF with or without dexamethasone are offset by greater collection yields and to define the minimum interval that should separate sequential collections.Study Design and Methods: Twenty donors were studied on three occasions. They were given either dexamethasone (8 mg, by mouth) plus a placebo injection, G--CSF (5 microg/kg, given subcutaneously) plus placebo capsules, or G--CSF plus dexamethasone. Granulocytes were collected by apheresis. A donor symptom survey was administered, and cell counts and blood chemistries were assessed before collection and 1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after collection.Results: More granulocytes were collected when G--CSF was given than when dexamethasone was given (41.1 +/- 20.4 x 10(9) vs. 21.0 +/- 10.0 x 10(9); p<0.001), but the use of G--CSF plus dexamethasone produced the greatest yields (67.1 +/- 22.0 x 10(9); p<0.002). When the donors were given dexamethasone alone, 58 percent experienced at least one symptom, compared to 85 percent of those given G--CSF and 75 percent of those given G--CSF plus dexamethasone. In all three regimens, platelet counts fell 19 percent to 24 percent after collection and remained below baseline for 7 to 14 days. Granulocyte counts returned to baseline within 3 to 7 days, but, in all three regimens, a mild granulocytopenia occurred 21 days after collection. With each of the regimens, blood chemistries changed, but the changes were mild and most returned to baseline within 7 days; however, changes in albumin, bilirubin, and AST persisted until 28 days after collection.Conclusion: These results support the use of G--CSF plus dexamethasone in granulocyte donors. G--CSF plus dexamethasone resulted in greater granulocyte yields than either agent alone and was associated with donor symptoms and changes in blood cell counts and chemistries similar to those seen with G--CSF alone or dexamethasone alone. Granulocytes can be safely collected a second time after a 7-day interval; however, for regular donors, it may be best to separate collections by 4 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A multitude of recommendations exist for laboratory assays to monitor the pace and endpoints of phlebotomy therapy for hemochromatosis. All of these recommendations rely on an assessment of storage iron to guide treatment, and none have been prospectively evaluated.Study Design and Methods: Nine consecutive patients underwent serial monitoring of Hb, MCV, transferrin saturation, and ferritin during weekly phlebotomy to deplete iron stores (induction therapy) and less frequent sessions to prevent iron reaccumulation (maintenance therapy). Changes in MCV and Hb were used to guide the pace of phlebotomy over a median of 7 years of follow-up.Results: During induction therapy, the MCV increased transiently because of reticulocytosis and then stabilized for a prolonged period before decreasing more sharply, which reflected iron-limited erythropoiesis. Iron depletion was achieved after a median of 38 phlebotomies and removal of 9.0 g of iron. Maintenance phlebotomy was targeted to maintain the MCV at 5 to 10 percent below prephlebotomy values and the Hb at >13 g per dL. Transferrin saturation fluctuated considerably during treatment, but remained below 35 percent during MCV-guided maintenance therapy. Ferritin values were not useful guides to the pace of phlebotomy. The median maintenance therapy phlebotomy interval was 7.5 weeks (range, 6-16), which corresponded to an average daily iron removal of 35 to 67 microg per kg. Most patients showed evidence of iron reaccumulation at phlebotomy intervals of 8 weeks or more.Conclusion: The MCV is an inexpensive, precise, physiologic indicator of erythropoietic iron availability. When used in conjunction with the Hb, it is a clinically useful guide to the pace of phlebotomy therapy for hemochromatosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transient but significant decreases in platelet counts have been documented to occur in donors undergoing single and serial short-term plateletpheresis collections. The effect of long-term regular plateletpheresis on donor platelet counts has not been characterized.Study Design and Methods: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the effects of long-term regular plateletpheresis donation on donor platelet counts. A computerized database containing records of 11,464 apheresis collections from 939 donors over a 4-year period was queried for serial preapheresis platelet counts. Donors were categorized by sex, age, and cumulative number of donations. The average difference in platelet counts (mDeltaPC) between each donor's first and last platelet count during this period was calculated for each category. A subgroup of frequent donors was selected for analysis of mDeltaPC, using the baseline platelet count obtained before the first plateletpheresis procedure.Results: A significant and sustained decrease in platelet count was identified for all donation frequency categories. The frequency of donation correlated directly with decrease in platelet count for all but the highest-frequency donation group, in which deferrals for low platelet count blunted the extent of the mDeltaPC. A mean decrease of 40,000 per microL from baseline occurred in the frequent-donor subgroup. A total of 84 donors (9%) were deferred for low platelet count. The majority returned to donate successfully after temporary deferral.Conclusions: Regular plateletpheresis donors develop sustained decreases in platelet count. However, clinically significant thrombocytopenia is unusual when rigorous ongoing review and prudent deferral policies are established and followed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]