Search

: Introduction: Achieving the virtual elimination of HIV requires equitable access to HIV prevention tools for all priority populations. Restricted access to healthcare means migrants face particular barriers to HIV prevention services. In February 2016, a peer‐led rapid HIV testing service for gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gay and bisexual men, GBM) in Melbourne, Australia, introduced free sexually transmissible infection (STI) testing funded through Medicare (Australia's universal healthcare system). Medicare ineligible migrant clients were required to pay up to $158AUD for STI tests. We determined the uptake of STI testing and assessed the impact on repeat HIV testing among Medicare eligible and ineligible clients. Methods: All HIV tests conducted between August 2014 and March 2018 were included. We describe client characteristics, STI testing uptake and HIV/STI positivity among Medicare eligible and ineligible clients. Repeat HIV testing, assessed as the percentage of HIV tests with a return test within six months, was compared pre‐integration (August 2014‐June 2016) and post‐integration(July 2016‐March 2018) of STI testing using segmented linear regression of monthly aggregate data for Medicare eligible and ineligible clients. Results: Analyses included 9134 HIV tests among 4753 individuals. Medicare ineligible clients were younger (p < 0.01), and fewer reported previously testing for HIV (p < 0.01) and high HIV risk sexual behaviours. There was no difference in HIV positivity between the two groups (p = 0.09). STI testing uptake was significantly lower among Medicare ineligible clients (7.6%, 85.3%; p < 0.01). Following STI testing introduction there was an immediate increase in six‐month return HIV testing (6.4%; p = 0.02) and a significantly increasing rate of return HIV testing between July 2016 and March 2018 (0.5% per month; p < 0.01) among Medicare eligible clients but no immediate change in return testing (−0.9%; p = 0.7) or the rate of change in return testing between July 2016 and March 2018 (0.1% per month; p = 0.3) among Medicare ineligible clients. In March 2018, six‐month return HIV testing was 52.3% and 13.2% among Medicare eligible and ineligible clients respectively. Discussion: Improvements in return HIV testing observed among Medicare eligible clients did not extend to Medicare ineligible clients highlighting the impact of inequitable access to comprehensive sexual healthcare on test‐and‐treat approaches to HIV prevention., Introduction UNAIDS HIV cascade targets that promote the control HIV epidemics through testing, diagnosis and treatment of people living with HIV (PLHIV) cannot be achieved without ensuring key populations at [...]

Background: Although HIV self-tests can support frequent HIV testing, their impact on attending clinics for other sexually transmissible infection (STI) testing and sexual health care is largely unknown. We explored intentions to use HIV self-tests and how this might affect patterns of attending sexual health services among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) in Victoria, Australia.Methods: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men self-completed an online survey between March 10 and June 10, 2019. Among GBM reporting lifetime HIV testing and intentions to self-test at least once annually, we used logistic regression to identify correlates of intending to replace clinic-based HIV testing with self-tests. Qualitative interviews with purposively selected survey participants undertaken between May and June 2019 explored the implications of self-testing on clinic-based sexual health care.Results: Of the 279 survey participants, 79 (29%) reported they would replace most or all clinic-based HIV tests with self-tests, with longer time since last testing for HIV and younger age associated with reporting this outcome in the multivariate analysis. Qualitative interviews revealed different perceived roles for self-tests and clinic-based testing, and the importance of integrating HIV self-tests within broader sexual health routines.Conclusions: Although GBM see a distinct role for HIV self-testing, its rollout will likely result in missed opportunities for clinic-based STI testing and education for some GBM, particularly among younger and less-recently tested GBM. Convenient, non-clinic-based approaches to STI testing are needed alongside support platforms to maximize the benefits of HIV self-testing within comprehensive sexual health routines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AIDS & Behavior is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)