1. 16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial:primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- Author
-
Michael Maeng, Leif Spange Mortensen, Henning Rud Andersen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Steen Dalby Kristensen, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Leif Thuesen, Thomas Engstrøm, Henrik Steen Hansen, Ulrik Abildgaard, and Pernille Gro Thrane
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Denmark ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Myocardial Infarction ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Percutaneous coronary intervention ,Danish ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Fibrinolytic Agents ,Internal medicine ,Fibrinolysis ,medicine ,Humans ,ST segment ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,medicine.disease ,Long-term outcome ,language.human_language ,Confidence interval ,Treatment Outcome ,ST-elevation myocardial infarction ,Cohort ,language ,Cardiology ,ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Aims The DANish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial found that interhospital transport to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) was superior to fibrinolysis at the local hospital in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at 30 days. The present study investigates the 16-year cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results We randomized 1572 STEMI patients to pPCI or fibrinolysis at 24 referral hospitals and 5 invasive centres in Denmark. Patients randomized to pPCI at referral hospitals were immediately transported to the nearest invasive centre. The main endpoint of the current study was a composite of death or rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI). Outcome information beyond 3 years was obtained through Danish health registries. After 16 years, pPCI-treated patients had a sustained lower rate of composite endpoint compared to patients treated with fibrinolysis in the overall cohort [58.7% vs. 62.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–0.98], and among patients transported for pPCI (58.7% vs. 64.1%; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.96). No difference in all-cause mortality was found, but cardiac mortality was reduced by an absolute of 4.4% in favour of pPCI (18.3% vs. 22.7%; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.98). pPCI postponed a main event with 12.3 months in average compared to fibrinolysis (95% CI 5.0–19.5). Conclusion The benefit of pPCI over fibrinolysis was maintained at 16-year follow-up. pPCI reduced the composite endpoint of death or rehospitalization for MI, reduced cardiac mortality, and delayed average time to a main event by approximately 1 year.
- Published
- 2020