Search

Background: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a major component of gastrointestinal cancer treatments. In multidrug regimens such as FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX, 5-FU is commonly administered as a bolus followed by an infusion. However, the pharmacologic rationale for incorporating the 5-FU bolus in these regimens is unclear, and there are other effective regimens for gastrointestinal cancers that do not include the bolus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether omission of the 5-FU bolus was associated with a difference in survival and toxicity., Methods: A real-world database from Flatiron Health was queried for patients with advanced colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers who received first-line FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX regimens. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to compare survival outcomes between patients who received the 5-FU bolus and those who did not. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for treatment selection bias., Results: This study included 11,765 patients with advanced colorectal (n=8,670), gastroesophageal (n=1,481), and pancreatic (n=1,614) cancers. Among all first-line 5-FU multidrug regimens, 10,148 (86.3%) patients received a 5-FU bolus and 1,617 (13.7%) did not. After IPTW analysis, we found that omitting the bolus was not associated with a decrease in overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.07; P=.74). However, omitting the bolus was associated with reductions in neutropenia (10.7% vs 22.7%; P<.01), thrombocytopenia (11.2% vs 16.1%; P<.01), and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors after treatment (19.6% vs 29.1%; P<.01)., Conclusions: After adjusting for baseline clinical factors, we found that omission of the 5-FU bolus from FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX regimens was not associated with decreased survival, but resulted in decreased toxicity and possible health care savings.

Background: Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2). The primary objective of the NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 trial was to establish whether trastuzumab improves disease-free survival when combined with trimodality treatment (paclitaxel plus carboplatin and radiotherapy, followed by surgery) for patients with untreated HER2-overexpressing oesophageal adenocarcinoma., Methods: NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 was an open label, randomised, phase 3 trial for which patients were accrued from 111 NRG-affiliated institutions in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed pathologically confirmed oesophageal adenocarcinoma, American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition T1N1-2 or T2-3N0-2 stage disease, and a Zubrod performance status of 0-2. Patients were stratified by adenopathy (no vs yes [coeliac absent] vs yes [coeliac present ≤2 cm]) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly intravenous paclitaxel (50 mg/m 2 intravenously over 1 h) and carboplatin (area under the curve 2, intravenously over 30-60 min) for 6 weeks with radiotherapy 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions (chemoradiotherapy) followed by surgery, with or without intravenous trastuzumab (4 mg/kg in week one, 2 mg/kg per week for 5 weeks during chemoradiotherapy, 6 mg/kg once presurgery, and 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 13 treatments starting 21-56 days after surgery). The primary endpoint, disease-free survival, was defined as the time from randomisation to death or first of locoregional disease persistence or recurrence, distant metastases, or second primary malignancy. Analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01196390; it is now closed and in follow-up., Findings: 606 patients were entered for HER2 assessment from Dec 30, 2010 to Nov 10, 2015, and 203 eligible patients who were HER2-positive were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab (n=102) or chemoradiotherapy alone (n=101). Median duration of follow-up was 2·8 years (IQR 1·4-5·7). Median disease-free survival was 19·6 months (95% CI 13·5-26·2) with chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab compared with 14·2 months (10·5-23·0) for chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0·99 [95% CI 0·71-1·39], log-rank p=0·97). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 41 (43%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group versus 52 (54%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group and grade 4 events occurred in 20 (21%) versus 21 (22%). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events for both groups were haematological (53 [56%] of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group vs 55 [57%] of 96 patients in the chemotherapy group) or gastrointestinal disorders (28 [29%] vs 20 [21 %]). 34 (36%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group and 27 (28%) of 96 patients in the chemoradiotherapy only group had treatment-related serious adverse events. There were eight treatment-related deaths: five (5%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group (bronchopleural fistula, oesophageal anastomotic leak, lung infection, sudden death, and death not otherwise specified), and three (3%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group (two multiorgan failure and one sepsis)., Interpretation: The addition of trastuzumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for HER2-overexpressing oesophageal cancer was not effective. Trastuzumab did not lead to increased toxicities, suggesting that future studies combining it with or using other agents targeting HER2 in oesophageal cancer are warranted., Funding: National Cancer Institute and Genentech., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests LAK reports personal fees from UpToDate and New Beta Innovations, and grants from Varian Medical Systems, outside the submitted work. DHI reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Merck, AMGEN, TAIHO, and Bayer, outside the submitted work. KLL reports personal fees from Elsevier, outside the submitted work. HM reports personal fees from Merck, outside the submitted work, and has received honoraria as chapter co-author for UpToDate (the chapters are all about gastrointestinal malignancies, but not oesophageal cancer). JM and KW report grants from the National Cancer institute (NCI) and other support from Genentech, during the conduct of the study. TD reports a patent for an intraoperative brachytherapy device. AKS, AWK, MGH, HPS, CHC, SS, MR, DADP, TSH, CMA, DW, LPL, XS, JS, and LR declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: A standard approach to treating resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery; however, recurrence is common. To improve this, we designed a single-arm, phase II trial that added an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, cetuximab (C), to CRT, with the hypothesis that EGFR inhibition would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rate., Materials and Methods: We aimed to increase the pCR rate from 25% to 45%. A Simon two-stage design (α and β of 0.10) required pCR/enrolled 5/18 for stage 1 and 14/40 total. CRT: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 days 1, 15, and 29; infusional 5-fluorouracil 180 mg/m 2 /24 hours × 35 days; C 400 mg/m 2 day 1 then 250 mg/m 2 days 8, 15, 22, and 29 and radiation (intensity modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] allowed) 180 cGy/day × 25 fractions (Monday through Friday). Following esophagectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT): weekly docetaxel 35 mg/m 2 and C 250 mg/m 2 5 out of 6 weeks for two cycles., Results: Of 21 eligible patients enrolled, 17 had surgery; 4 died before operation (due to pulmonary embolism 4 days after CRT, G3 diarrhea, progressive disease during CRT, sepsis/hypoxia during CRT, and acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]). pCR = 7/17. Three postoperative deaths due to ARDS resulted in seven total study-related deaths. Of the 14 remaining patients, 12 started and completed adjuvant CT. Two of seven patients with pCR died, both of ARDS. Out of the 21 eligible subjects in this study, 13 have died and 8 remain alive. The use of IMRT did not correlate with ARDS., Conclusion: This regimen demonstrated promising activity. Toxicity was significant, with seven study-related deaths leading to closure after stage 1. All postoperative deaths were due to ARDS. This regimen is not recommended., Implications for Practice: Esophageal cancer is a disease with a high death rate. The current treatment involves giving chemotherapy plus radiation followed by surgery, but this cures only a quarter of patients. In order to improve survival, better treatments are needed. This trial evaluated the addition of a novel drug, cetuximab, to chemotherapy plus radiation. Unfortunately, the side effects were too great and the study was stopped early., (© AlphaMed Press 2019.)

Background and Objectives: Gastric cancer in the Hispanic population commonly presents with poor clinical features. Characteristics of this vulnerable population and optimal therapy for these patients have not been clearly defined., Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2014), we analyzed patient demographics, clinical factors, treatment-related factors, and outcomes for Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with gastric adenocarcinoma in the United States., Results: A total of 129 666 patients were included in this analysis. Hispanics were younger, more often female, had larger tumors, and were more likely to present with metastatic disease (all P < 0.001). Hispanics were more likely to undergo staging laparoscopy (5.6% vs 4.9%; P = 0.037), gastrectomy (63.5% vs 56.9%; P < 0.001), and ≥ 15 lymph nodes examined (56.1% vs 50.5%; P < 0.001). Hispanics were less likely to have negative margins (91.2% vs 92.8%; P = 0.004). Hispanics with stage II/III disease were less likely to receive neoadjuvant therapy (31.7% vs 38.7%; P < 0.001), but more likely to receive multimodal therapy (48.9% vs 46.1%; P = 0.01). Predictors for improved overall survival in Hispanics included multimodal therapy, negative margins, and treatment at an academic center., Conclusions: Efforts to optimize treatment of this distinct and growing population of gastric cancer patients should focus on earlier diagnosis, referral to academic centers, and high-quality surgery., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Although outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) have improved, the gains in benefit may not be shared uniformly among patients of disparate socioeconomic status. In the current study, the authors investigated whether area-based median household income (MHI) is predictive of survival among patients with SCCA., Methods: Patients diagnosed with SCCA from 2004 through 2013 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry were included. Socioeconomic status was defined by census-tract MHI level and divided into quintiles. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression were used to study predictors of survival and radiotherapy receipt., Results: A total of 9550 cases of SCCA were included. The median age of the patients was 58 years, 63% were female, 85% were white, and 38% were married. In multivariable analyses, patients living in areas with lower MHI were found to have worse overall survival and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared with those in the highest income areas. Mortality hazard ratios for lowest to highest income were 1.32 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18-1.49), 1.31 (95% CI, 1.16-1.48), 1.19 (95% CI, 1.06-1.34), and 1.16 (95% CI, 1.03-1.30). The hazard ratios for CSS similarly ranged from 1.34 to 1.22 for lowest to highest income. Older age, black race, male sex, unmarried marital status, an earlier year of diagnosis, higher tumor grade, and later American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of disease also were associated with worse CSS. Income was not found to be associated with the odds of initiating radiotherapy in multivariable analysis (odds ratio of 0.87 for lowest to highest income level; 95% CI, 0.63-1.20)., Conclusions: MHI appears to independently predict CSS and overall survival in patients with SCCA. Black race was found to remain a predictor of SCCA survival despite controlling for income. Further study is needed to understand the mechanisms by which socioeconomic inequalities affect cancer care and outcomes. Cancer 2018;124:1791-7. © 2018 American Cancer Society., (© 2018 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Prior studies of timeliness of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) initiation in stage III colon cancer have suggested longer time to AC at public compared with private hospitals. Few studies have explored differences in AC completion. We investigated whether timely initiation and completion of AC differed between a public and private hospital, affiliated with the same academic institution in a large, urban setting., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of stage III colon cancer patients who had surgery and AC at the same medical center between 2008 and 2015, either at its affiliated public hospital (n = 43) or private hospital (n = 79). We defined timely initiation as receiving AC within 60 days postoperatively, and completion as receiving ≥ 75% of planned AC. Univariate and stepwise multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with AC delivery., Results: Median number of days to AC was significantly greater among patients at the public (53, range 31-231) compared with the private hospital (43, range 25-105; p = 0.002). However, the percentage of patients with timely AC initiation did not differ substantially by hospital (74 vs 81%, p = 0.40). In multivariable analysis, age (OR 0.95/year, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and laparoscopic versus open surgery (OR 5.65, 95% CI 1.92-16.62) were significant factors associated with timely AC initiation. Moreover, AC completion did not differ significantly between public (83.7%) and private (89.9%) hospital patients (p = 0.32)., Conclusions: The proportions of patients with timely initiation and completion of AC were similar at a public and private hospital affiliated with a large, urban medical center. Future research should investigate how specific system-level factors help alleviate this expected difference in timely care delivery.

Objective: To compare clinical and treatment characteristics and outcomes in locally advanced anal cancer, a potentially curable disease, in patients referred from a public or private hospital., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 112 anal cancer patients from a public and a private hospital who received definitive chemoradiotherapy at the same cancer center between 2004 and 2013. Tumor stage, radiotherapy delay, radiotherapy duration, and unplanned treatment breaks ≥10 days were compared using t-test and χ(2) test. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and colostomy free survival (CFS) were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models for OS and DFS were developed., Results: The follow-up was 14.9 months (range, 0.7-94.8 months). Public hospital patients presented with significantly higher clinical T stage (P<0.05) and clinical stage group (P<0.05), had significantly longer radiotherapy delays (P<0.05) and radiotherapy duration (P<0.05), and had more frequent radiation therapy (RT) breaks ≥10 days (P<0.05). Three-year OS showed a marked trend in favor of private hospital patients for 3-year OS (72.8% vs. 48.9%; P=0.171), 3-year DFS (66.3% vs. 42.7%, P=0.352), and 3-year CFS (86.4% vs. 68.9%, P=0.299). Referral hospital was not predictive of OS or DFS on multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Public hospital patients presented at later stage and experienced more delays in initiating and completing radiotherapy, which may contribute to the trend in poorer DFS and OS. These findings emphasize the need for identifying clinical and treatment factors that contribute to decreased survival in low socioeconomic status (SES) populations.

Objective: Current national guidelines include category 1 recommendations for perioperative chemotherapy or adjuvant chemoradiation with surgical resection for patients with stage IB-IIIB gastric cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials in which chemotherapy was prospectively tested against chemoradiation with surgical resection., Methods: We electronically searched PubMed and EMBASE for randomized, controlled clinical trials involving patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, status post-R0 resection. The interventions compared were adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiation, with any chemotherapy regimen. The primary outcomes of interest were disease-free survival and overall survival. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to calculate effect sizes., Results: Six trials that included 1,171 patients were evaluated; 599 were randomized to adjuvant chemoradiation and 572 to chemotherapy alone. Chemoradiation was associated with a significant increase in disease-free survival (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.03) when compared to chemotherapy alone. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.95-1.71). Five trials found no statistically significant differences in toxicities between the two groups., Conclusion: In patients with gastric cancer status post-R0 resection, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with higher disease-free survival when compared to chemotherapy alone. It remains appropriate to design trials testing new systemic agents with radiotherapy., (© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with improved survival. The Southwest Oncology Group designed a trimodality, phase II, single-arm trial with objectives of achieving a pCR rate of 40% with prospective exploratory analyses of intratumoral molecular markers postulated to affect response and survival., Patients and Methods: Patients with clinically staged II or III esophageal adenocarcinoma received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, and 29; protracted-infusion fluorouracil (PI-FU) 180 mg/m(2)/d on days 8 through 43; and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) 5 days a week at 1.8 Gy/d for 25 fractions; surgery was performed 28 to 42 days after neoadjuvant therapy. Chemotherapy was planned after surgery. Tumors were analyzed for mRNA expression and polymorphisms in genes involved in drug metabolism and DNA repair., Results: Ninety-three patients were evaluable. Two deaths (2.2%) were attributable to preoperative therapy, and two deaths (2.2%) were attributable to surgery. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were recorded for 47.3% and 19.4% of patients, respectively. Seventy-nine patients (84.9%) underwent surgery; 67.7% of patients had R0 resections. Twenty-six patients (28.0%) had confirmed pCR (95% CI, 19.1% to 38.2%). At a median follow-up of 39.2 months, estimates of median and 3-year overall survival (OS) were 28.3 months and 45.1%, respectively. Intratumoral ERCC-1 gene expression was inversely related to progression-free survival and OS., Conclusion: Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin, PI-FU, and EBRT for esophageal adenocarcinoma is active and tolerable. Because the regimen failed to meet the primary end point, it does not define a new standard. However, future trials can be built on this platform to validate the role of ERCC-1 in determining the best systemic regimen for individual patients.

Introduction: Esophageal adenocarcinomas commonly express the epidermal growth factor receptor. This trial assessed the 6-month overall survival probability in metastatic esophageal cancer patients treated with cetuximab as second-line therapy., Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label phase II study of single-agent cetuximab for metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who failed one prior chemotherapy regimen. Adequate organ function and Zubrod performance status of 0 to 2 were required. Patients received cetuximab 400 mg/m intravenously (IV) on week 1 and 250 mg/m IV weekly thereafter. The primary objective was to determine 6-month overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, response rate, and toxicity. Tumor tissue was collected for correlative studies., Results: Sixty-three patients were registered, with eight ineligible or never treated. Fifty-five eligible patients (49 men, 6 women; median age = 61.2 years [range, 30.7-88.5]) were enrolled. Twenty patients survived more than 6 months for a 6-month overall survival rate of 36% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24-50%). The median overall survival was 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.2-5.9). Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.7-1.9). One partial response and two unconfirmed partial responses were observed. Two patients experienced grade 4 fatigue. There was one treatment-related death due to pneumonitis. Germline polymorphisms of epidermal growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor, interleukin (IL)-8, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, vascular epidermal growth factor receptor (VEGF), CCND1, neuropilin 1 (NRP1), and K-ras mutational status were not associated with response or survival., Conclusions: The 6-month overall survival rate of 36% observed on this study failed to meet the primary survival objective. Thus, cetuximab alone cannot be recommended in the second-line treatment of metastatic esophageal cancer.

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in advanced esophageal cancer., Patients and Methods: One hundred and two patients with advanced esophageal cancer were treated with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly over a 1-h infusion. One cycle was defined as 4 weeks of therapy. Ninety-five patients were assessable for toxicity and 86 patients who completed at least two cycles of treatment were assessable for response. Sixty-six patients had adenocarcinoma (66%) and 65 patients (68%) had no prior chemotherapy., Results: A median of three cycles was delivered (range 1-11). Partial responses (PRs) were seen in 11 patients [13%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6% to 20%]. In patients without prior chemotherapy, PRs were seen in 10 patients (15%, 95% CI 6% to 24%), with comparable response in adenocarcinoma (8/50, 16%) and squamous carcinoma (2/15, 13%). Limited response was seen in patients with prior chemotherapy (1/21, 5%). The median duration of response was 172 days. The median survival was 274 days. Therapy was well tolerated with minimal hematologic or grade 3 or 4 toxicity., Conclusion: Weekly paclitaxel has limited activity in esophageal cancer. The median survival, modest activity, and tolerance of therapy indicate that weekly paclitaxel may be an option in patients unable to tolerate combination chemotherapy.

Recent studies suggest that there may be a strong correlation between the p53 status of a tumor and a patient's response to chemotherapy. Therefore, we determined p53 status in 36 patients with disseminated colorectal cancer by cDNA sequencing and immunohistochemical staining, as well as by the gene expression level of thymidylate synthase (TS), the target enzyme of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), by reverse transcription-PCR. Ten patients (28%) experienced a clinical response to 5-FU chemotherapy. Overall, TS expression and response to chemotherapy were associated: 9 of 18 (50%) patients with TS < or = 3.0 x 10(-3) responded, compared to 1 of 18 (6%) patients with TS > 3.0 x 10(-3) (P = 0.003). p53 mutations were found in 21 of 36 patients (58%) using cDNA cycle sequencing, and p53 protein overexpression was found in 20 of 32 patients (62%) using immunohistochemistry staining. Overall p53 status and response to chemotherapy were associated: 5 of 10 (50%) patients with wild-type p53 or negative p53 staining experienced a response, but only 5 of 26 (19%) patients with mutant p53 or p53 overexpression responded. TS expression, but not expression of p53, was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.002). Patients with wild-type p53 had significantly lower TS levels compared to patients with mutated p53 (P = 0.044). In this study, we also present data linking specific p53 point mutations to TS expression levels and resistance to 5-FU. Although the number of patients is relatively small, these results identify p53 status and TS gene expression as associated with response in disseminated colorectal cancer; independent studies are needed to confirm these findings and to provide information leading to a better understanding of the role of 5-FU-based chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

We initiated a retrospective study to determine whether p53 status and thymidylate synthase (TS) protein expression in primary colon tumors influence recurrence and survival for patients with stage II colon cancer. Tumor specimens from 45 consecutive untreated patients with stage II colon cancer were examined for p53 and TS protein expression using immunohistochemistry. The median follow-up was 5.1 years. Eighteen patients had left-sided tumors, and 27 had right-sided tumors. Fourteen of 45 patients (31%) developed recurrence. p53 overexpression was detected in the tumors of 18 patients (40%); 10 patients (55%) with p53 overexpression recurred; and 4 of 27 (15%) without evidence of p53 overexpression recurred (P = 0.002). High TS expression was detected in the tumors of 16 patients (36%): 8 patients (50%) with high TS expression recurred, and 6 patients (21%) with low TS expression recurred (P = 0.027). Patients with p53 overexpression had a significantly poorer survival than did those patients without p53 overexpression (P < 0.001). High TS expression was associated with poor survival (P = 0.004). p53 overexpression and high TS expression were significantly associated with left-sided tumors (P = 0.003 and P = 0.022). Thirteen of 16 patients (81%) with high TS expression also overexpressed p53, and 24 of 29 patients (81%) with low TS expression did not manifest p53 overexpression (P < 0.001). p53 and TS expression in primary stage II colon cancer are associated and appear to influence recurrence and survival. In this pilot study, left-sided tumors demonstrate significantly more p53 overexpression and significantly higher TS expression than do right-sided tumors, which may explain the significantly poorer survival for patients with left-sided tumors.

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was used to measure gene expressions (relative mRNA levels) of p16 and the alternate transcript pl6beta in esophageal and gastric tumors. p16 gene expression was undetectable in 13 of 25 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. In 11 of these tumors, pl6beta was simultaneously missing whereas two of the pl6-deficient tumors still expressed p16beta. Among 34 esophageal adenocarcinomas and 11 gastric adenocarcinomas, only one tumor lacked p16 expression and all tumors expressed p16beta. p16 sequences were not detectable by PCR in genomic DNA from tumors lacking both p16 and p16beta mRNA, suggesting that the simultaneous loss of both gene expressions resulted from homozygous genomic deletion of the p16 gene. However, DNA from tumors that lacked p16 mRNA but expressed pl6beta did contain the p16 gene, consistent with loss of p16 expression in these tumors by transcriptional suppression. No point mutations in p16 cDNA were detected among 12 that were sequenced, but one p16 cDNA from a squamous cell carcinoma had a 19-base deletion, possibly indicating a splice-site mutation. Among those tumors that expressed p16 mRNA, the gene expression values of both p16 and pl6beta varied over a wide range. In some cases, p16 expression was detectable but low, suggesting that down-regulation of p16 expression may be used in some cases to achieve the funtional equivalent of gene deletion or transcriptional silencing. These results demonstrate that p16 expression patterns differ based on tumor histology and origin. Homozygous deletion of p16 appears to be common in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas but in adenocarcinomas, both gene deletion and transcriptional silencing of p16 were infrequent.

Background: UFT is a fixed-ratio combination of uracil and Ftorafur, a prodrug that is absorbed orally and metabolized in vivo to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Uracil potentiates 5-FU through interference with its catabolism. The combination of UFT and leucovorin in patients with advanced incurable colorectal cancer, to evaluate preliminary activity and toxicity in this patient population., Methods: Twenty-one patients were treated. Twenty patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Patients received UFT 350 mg/m2/day divided every 8 hours. Patients took a 5 mg tablet of leucovorin every 8 hours, concurrent with each UFT dose. Treatment was continued for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day rest., Results: Five major objective responses (one complete and four partial) were observed. Toxicity was mild, with no dose-limiting myelosuppression. Four patients experienced grade 3 diarrhea or higher, and two patients experienced dose-limiting mucositis., Conclusion: UFT and low dose leucovorin is a well tolerated, orally administered regimen with activity in colorectal cancer. A randomized comparison of this regimen with conventional parenteral regimens is warranted.

Although epidermoid cancer of the anus is an uncommon tumor, it has served well as a model for several disciplines within oncology. Advances in understanding the epidemiology and the definitive therapeutic role of combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy for anal tumors have encouraged many investigators to study similar applications in the more common epithelial malignancies. In this monograph, the anatomy of the anal area is reviewed emphasizing the differences in natural history and prognosis between anal margin and anal canal cancers. Treatment does not depend on the specific histologic variant of the epidermoid tumors which arise in this region. The roles of viruses, of immunodeficiency syndromes, and of a history of benign anal disease and trauma in the etiology and epidemiology of this tumor are discussed. Current staging will be critically reviewed stressing that invasive (pathologic) staging by surgery is not indicated, but noninvasive staging has definite limitations. Small superficial tumors may be definitively treated with either limited surgery or radiation. While regional treatments such as surgery and radiation offer cure to between 45% and 60% of nonselected patients, initial treatment with combination radiation and chemotherapy produces cure rates between 65% and 85% for similar groups of patients. The rationale for combined modality therapy is presented and recommendations for therapy by stage of the cancer are made. Finally, we present questions that remain for future research in the clinic and laboratory regarding epidermoid tumors of the anus.

Eighteen patients with unresectable localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated by a combination of chemotherapy plus hyperfractionated radiation therapy to the pancreas for 4080 cGy with an additional 960 cGy to the pancreatic tumor and a surrounding margin. One hundred and twenty cGy were given twice daily 4 to 6 hours apart. High-energy photon or electron beams were used with treatment planning based on computed tomographic (CT) scans. Patients were given chemotherapy in the form of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 350 mg/m2 on the first 3 and last 3 days of radiation therapy. On day 53, chemotherapy was given that included 600 mg/m2 IV of 5-FU, 1 gm/m2 of streptozotocin, and 10 mg/m2 IV of mitomycin C. The 5-FU and streptozotocin were repeated on days 60, 81, and 88, and the stretozotocin and mitomycin (SMF) cycles were repeated every 8 weeks until progression. Radiation toxicity was generally tolerable with one of 18 evaluable patients having severe nausea and vomiting and two of 18 patients having severe diarrhea. One patient had total liver failure and died 3 months after initiation of therapy. Six patients had severe hematopoietic toxicity during chemotherapy. Overall, the severe toxicity rate was higher (67%) than in previous studies. Median survival was 35 weeks, the 1-year survival rate was 39%, and the patient who survived the longest died at 68 months. Although this schedule of hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy was disappointing, combined experimental radiation approaches plus chemotherapy for localized unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas deserve additional research.

One hundred and twenty-one cancer patients received 134 courses of total parenteral nutrition (TPN); almost all were treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The average weight loss prior to TPN was 6.7 kg and albumin 3.1 g%/patient; 25% glucose solution with 4.25 g% amino acids was used as a calorie and nitrogen source. The average weight gain was 2.6 kg for those who received TPN less than 2 wk and 4.5 kg if TPN was given for greater than 2 wk. Complications were low; 3% had proven TPN-related septicemia. Mild to moderate reversible metabolic complications were common, although severe complications were rare; no one died because of TPN. Our experience confirms the previous reports that TPN can be given safely to malnourished compromised cancer patients.

Twenty-three patients with gallbladder and cholangiocarcinoma were treated with m-AMSA at doses of 60-120 mg/m2 i.v. repeated at 4-week intervals. Toxicity was primarily hematologic. Partial responses occurred in 1/12 patients with gallbladder cancer and 1/11 patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The activity of m-AMSA in these neoplasms appears similar to that seen in hepatomas.

Celestin intubation of the esophagus is occasionally employed in the palliation of unresectable esophageal carcinoma and in the obturation of malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas. Fourteen of 192 patients with carcinomas of the esophagus had Celestin tubes inserted at our institution between October 1977 and October 1982. Although tube insertion carries a low operative risk, there is significant subsequent morbidity associated with its use. Complications were identified radiographically in 11 of the 14 patients. Gastroesophageal reflux with aspiration pneumonia, tube obstruction, and tube migration were demonstrated most often. When Celestin tube use is deemed appropriate, the clinician and radiologist should be aware of the possible complications.

Under the auspices of the Southwest Oncology Group, Wayne State University tested a schedule using bleomycin and mitomycin C that was previously reported to give a response rate of 88%. In our patients the same regimen produced similar toxic effects but a far different response rate of 15.8% (one complete remission and two partial remissions). The only discernible difference in the two patient groups was the amount of radiation given prior to chemotherapy.

Quinone derivatives have shown intensive antitumor activity in a broad variety of neoplasias. Aziridinylbenzoquinone is designed to have adequate lipid solubility to attain useful drug concentrations in the central nervous system. A Phase I study of aziridinylbenzoquinone was conducted in 32 patients with advanced solid cancers. The drug was given as a slow i.v. injection on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 42-day cycle with a 2-week rest. Five dose levels ranging from 5 to 20 mg/sq m were studied, with 3 to 10 patients treated at each level; a total of 156 doses were administered. The major toxicity was myelosuppression with the median nadir in platelet and white blood cells occurring at Days 15 to 27 of the cycle, and first appearing at doses greater than 10 mg/sq m. Anemia was first seen at the 10-mg/sq m dose level, occurring between Days 22 and 40. Nonmyelosuppressive toxic effects included nausea and vomiting, anorexia, diarrhea, stomatitis, slight alopecia, and transient fever. The highest tolerated dose was 20 mg/sq m, the recommended dose for Phase II studies. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were studied in 17 patients by a high-pressure liquid chromatography method. Plasma decay curves could be fitted to a two-compartment open-system model with an overall average alpha and beta half-life values of 10.5 +/- 6.28 min and 16.90 +/- 8.63 (S.D.) hr. Aziridinylbenzoquinone levels were determined in urine samples of 12 patients, but less than 0.1% of the dose was excreted in the 0- to 4-hr sample of two patients, and none was detected in the urine of 10 patients.