Search

Preoperative injection of Botulinum Toxin A (Botox) has been described as an adjunctive therapy to facilitate fascial closure of large hernia defects in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of Botox injections on fascial closure and overall outcomes to further validate its role in AWR. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients undergoing AWR at our institution between January 2014 and March 2022. Patients who did and did not receive preoperative Botox injections were analyzed and compared. A total of 426 patients were included (Botox 76, NBotox 350). The Botox group had significantly larger hernia defects (90 cm 2 vs 9 cm 2 , p < 0.01) and a higher rate of component separations performed (60.5% vs 14.4%, p < 0.01). Despite this large difference in hernia defect size, primary fascial closure rates were similar between the groups (p = 0.49). Notably, the Botox group had higher rates of surgical-site infections (SSIs)/surgical-site occurrences (SSOs) (p < 0.01). Following propensity score matching to control for multiple patient factors including age, sex, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hernia size, the Botox group still had a higher rate of component separations (50% vs 26.3%, p = 0.03) and higher incidence of SSIs/SSOs (39.5% vs 13.5%, p = 0.01). Multimodal therapy with Botox injections and component separations can help achieve fascial closure of large defects during AWR. However, adding these combined therapies may increase the occurrence of postoperative SSIs/SSOs., (© 2024. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).)

Background: Obesity affects more than one-third of Americans and can be treated with bariatric surgery, most commonly sleeve gastrectomy (SG). SG has been shown to increase the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in some patients, which can be refractory to medical management. Surgical options for post-SG GERD include magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (SGRY). A comparative analysis of MSA and SGRY for post-SG GERD was performed to evaluate postoperative outcomes., Methods: A retrospectively maintained prospectively gathered database from 2018 to 2023 was used to identify patients who underwent MSA or SGRY for the indication of GERD after SG. Differences among patient characteristics; GERD assessments, including the health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire and the reflux symptom index (RSI); and procedure outcomes were collected and analyzed according to surgery type., Results: A total of 92 patients (85 females and 7 males) met the inclusion criteria. The study included 17 patients in the MSA group, 71 patients in the SGRY group, and 4 patients who underwent both procedures. The average preoperative body mass index (BMI) of all patients was 33.3. Compared with patients who underwent MSA, those who underwent SGRY presented with higher BMI (29.4 vs 34.2, respectively; P = .013), preoperative GERD-HRQL (35 vs 52, respectively; P = .046), and RSI (14 vs 28, respectively; P = .017). Postoperatively, patients who underwent SGRY demonstrated a higher decrease in mean postoperative DeMeester score than those who underwent MSA (44.2 vs 13.9, respectively; P = .040), with 22 patients (50%) in the SGRY group vs 10 patients (20%) in the MSA group achieving normalization., Conclusion: Although MSA remains a viable surgical alternative, our study indicated that SGRY can produce better symptom control and decrease acid exposure compared with MSA in patients with post-SG GERD., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose/background: Despite the growing use of bioabsorbable mesh in ventral hernia repairs (VHR), the evidence of its impact on patient outcomes remains limited. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh for ventral hernia repair through a systematic review and meta-analysis., Methods: A literature search of five databases (PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Medline, and Google Scholar) produced a list of publications that analyzed the use of P4HB mesh in ventral hernia repair in both clean and contaminated cases. The primary postoperative outcomes of hernia recurrence, surgical site infections (SSI), and any complications were analyzed through a pooled meta-analysis., Results: In our systematic review, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1858 patients (933 males and 925 females) and an average age of 56.8 years. The median follow-up ranged from 1.6 to 62.3 months. In our meta-analysis, the use of P4HB mesh in VHR in proportion of events demonstrated a recurrence rate of 9% [6%; 15%], SSI of 10% [6%; 16%] and 35% [9%; 42%] for rate of any complications. Sub-meta-analysis restricted to studies with follow up > 18 months continues to show low rates of recurrence of 9% (95%CI, 4-17%), SSI of 9% (95%CI, 4-16%), and 31% (95%CI, 23-41%) for any complications., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the use of P4HB mesh is both safe and effective in ventral hernia repairs. When further analyzed past 18 months, the time where P4HB mesh fully resorbs, the rates of hernia recurrence, SSI, and any complications remain low of upwards of 5 years and comparable to the rates seen in synthetic and biologics in similar patient populations., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) explantation is an uncommon occurrence, and there are limited studies characterizing factors predictive of MSA explantation. This study aimed to create a nomogram to aid in determining the probability of explantation in patients before MSA implantation., Methods: An institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing antireflux surgery between February 2015 and May 2023. All patients who underwent MSA-related procedures were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups, explant group and nonexplant group, and differences were analyzed. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify independent risk factors for predicting MSA explantation, and a nomogram-based scoring tool was developed., Results: There were 227 patients (134 females and 93 males) with a mean age of 51.4 years. The explant group included 28 patients (12.3%), whereas the nonexplant group included 199 patients (87.7%). Patient sociodemographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, preoperative testing results, and surgical history were included in the analysis. The multivariable regression model resulted in 4 significant variables that were included in the nomogram. These included preoperative DeMeester score, preoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life score, preoperative distal contractile integral value on manometry, and body mass index. Based on these variables, a scoring nomogram was developed with values ranging from 0 to 18., Conclusion: Our data were used to develop a scoring calculator capable of predicting the probability of MSA explantation. This scoring tool can guide preoperative patient selection and treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr Steven G. Leeds is a consultant for Ethicon. The other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Coronavirus-19 (COVID) stressed healthcare systems by increasing hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality. The impact of COVID on surgical patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the COVID pandemic affected surgical patients at a large quaternary referral hospital., Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical procedures was performed to evaluate patients undergoing surgery. The impact of COVID on surgical patients was divided into four timeframes based on government regulations: pre-COVID (January 1, 2020 to March 15, 2020), suspended (March 16, 2020 to May 4, 2020), backlogged cases (May 5, 2020 to June 14, 2020), and restoration (June 15, 2020 to September 30, 2020). Differences between patient characteristics and outcomes during these timeframes were evaluated., Results: A total of 21,424 surgical cases were performed between January 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020. During the suspended timeframe (when all elective cases were cancelled), the percentage of surgeries increased in men (53.8% compared to 49.2% pre-COVID; P  < 0.01), in Black and Hispanic patients (23.1% and 15.3%, respectively; P  < 0.05), and in Medicaid and self-pay patients (16.3% compared to 9.9% pre-COVID; P  < 0.01). All service lines experienced similar trends in overall case volume except obstetrics (constant), trauma, vascular, and thoracic (which increased during the suspended timeframe)., Conclusions: COVID-19 induced stresses in surgical patients, altering payor mix and impacting minority groups at a large quaternary referral hospital., Competing Interests: The authors report no funding. Dr. Leeds is a consultant for Ethicon and Boston Scientific. Dr. Ward is a consultant for Boston Scientific. All other authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report., (Copyright © 2024 Baylor University Medical Center.)

Zenker per-oral endoscopic myotomy (ZPOEM) has become a promising technique for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). The aim of this study was to add to the limited body of literature evaluating the safety and efficacy of ZPOEM. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent ZPOEM at two separate institutions between January 2020 and January 2022. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative clinical data, intraoperative data, adverse events, and length of stay were analyzed. A total of 40 patients (mean age 72.5 years, 62.5% male) were included. Average operative time was 54.7 minutes and average length of stay was 1.1 days. There were three adverse events, and only one was related to the technical aspects of the procedure. Patients showed improvement in the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores at 1 month (5 vs 7, p < 0.0001). The median FOIS scores remained 7 at both 6 and 12 months, although this improvement was not statistically significant at these time intervals (p = 0.46 and 0.37, respectively). Median dysphagia scores were decreased at 1 (2.5 vs 0, p < 0.0001), 6 (2.5 vs 0, p < 0.0001), and 12 months (2.5 vs 0, p = 0.016). The number of patients reporting ≥1 symptom was also decreased at 1 (40 vs 9, p < 0.0001) and 6 months (40 vs 1, p = 0.041). Although the number of patients reporting ≥1 symptom remained consistent at 12 months, this was not statistically significant (40 vs 1, p = 0.13). ZPOEM is a safe and highly effective treatment for the management of ZD. ., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (GPOEM) has been developed as an effective treatment option for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis. Other endoscopic options, such as pyloric injection of botulinum toxin (Botox), is often performed with limited efficacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate GPOEM for the treatment of gastroparesis and compare its efficacy to Botox injection results reported in the literature., Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent a GPOEM for the treatment of gastroparesis between September 2018 and June 2022. Changes in Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy (GES) studies and Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom (GCSI) scores from the preoperative to postoperative period were analyzed. In addition, a systematic review was conducted to identify all publications reporting the outcomes of Botox injections for the treatment of gastroparesis., Results: A total of 65 patients (51 female, 14 male) underwent a GPOEM during the study period. Twenty-eight patients (22 female, 6 male) had both preoperative and postoperative GES studies in addition to GCSI scores. The etiologies of gastroparesis were diabetic (n = 4), idiopathic (n = 18), and postsurgical (n = 6). Fifty percent of these patients had undergone previous failed interventions including Botox injections (n = 6), gastric stimulator placement (n = 2), and endoscopic pyloric dilation (n = 6). Outcomes showed a significant decrease in GES percentages (mean difference = - 23.5%, p < 0.001) and GCSI scores (mean difference = - 9.6, p = 0.02) postoperatively. In the systematic review for Botox, transient mean improvements in postoperative GES percentages and GCSI scores were reported at 10.1% and 4.0, respectively., Conclusion: GPOEM leads to significant improvement in GES percentages and GCSI scores postoperatively and is superior to Botox injection results reported in the literature., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a framework for optimal perioperative care to improve post-operative outcomes following surgical procedures. However, there is no consensus regarding an ERAS protocol following foregut surgery. The purpose of this study was to develop an ERAS protocol for these patients and determine whether they improved outcomes., Methods: An IRB approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing benign minimally invasive foregut surgery from October 2018 to January 2020. All patients were entered into the ACS risk calculator to determine their predicted rate of complications and length of stay for comparison between the ERAS and control groups. Propensity matching was used to compare post-ERAS implementation to pre-ERAS implementation patients. Firth logistic and Poisson regression analysis were used to assess the rate of complications and length of stay among the different groups of patients., Results: There were 255 patients (60 Post-ERAS, 195 Pre-ERAS) who underwent foregut operations and met inclusion criteria. ERAS was implemented, and patients were then subdivided based on those who completed ERAS (44) and those who deviated from the protocol (16). Propensity matching analysis was performed to compare the different cohorts and showed ERAS patients had 41% decreased odds of complications and 33% reduction in length of stay compared to pre-ERAS patients. Completion of the ERAS protocol resulted in even further reductions in odds of complication and length of stay compared to patients who deviated from the protocol., Conclusions: ERAS has shown to improve perioperative outcomes, but there is limited literature supporting the use of ERAS in foregut surgery. Usage of an ERAS protocol can decrease complications and reduce the length of stay in patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Two common surgical procedures used to treat esophageal motility disorders are laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). The difference in frequency of follow-up interventions following these procedures is unknown. This study was designed to report differences in post-surgical interventions as one of the major long-term follow-up expectations., Methods: An IRB approved registry was used to identify all patients undergoing surgery with LHM or POEM. Following surgery, patients requiring additional interventions with esophageal non-pneumatic dilation, botox injection, or repeat myotomy, as well as persistent proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate risk factors associated with return for additional post-operative intervention., Results: A total of 203 patients were identified, 139 met inclusion criteria (33 LHM and 106 POEM). There was a higher rate of non-pneumatic EGD dilation (33% vs 15%, p = 0.04), repeat myotomy (18% vs 2%, p < 0.01), and higher rate of overall post-operative intervention in LHM than POEM. With POEM, there was a higher rate of post-operative PPI use (63 vs 29%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in time to post-operative intervention for either group, but if intervention were to occur the median time was within the first year. Patients with a change in pre- to post-operative Eckardt score of 4 or greater decreased their chance of having a post-operative intervention., Conclusion: Our results for both LHM and POEM emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up in patients with an esophageal motility disorder. We have found that patients undergoing LHM are more likely to have a post-operative intervention as well as a higher rate of repeat myotomy than POEM. With both interventions, a greater change in Eckardt score decreased the likelihood of reintervention., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown in some specialties to improve short-term outcomes following surgical procedures. There is no consensus regarding the optimal perioperative care for bariatric surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to develop a bariatric ERAS protocol and determine whether it improved outcomes following surgery., Materials and Methods: An IRB-approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing bariatric surgery from October 2018 to January 2020. Propensity matching was used to compare post-ERAS implementation patients to pre-ERAS implementation., Results: There were 319 patients (87 ERAS, 232 pre-ERAS) who underwent bariatric operations between October 2018 and January 2020. Seventy-nine patients were kept on the ERAS protocol whereas 8 deviated. Patients who deviated from the ERAS protocol had a longer length of stay when compared to patients who completed the protocol. The use of any ERAS protocol (completed or deviated) reduced the odds of complications by 54% and decreased length of stay by 15%. Furthermore, patients who completed the ERAS protocol had an 83% reduction in odds of complications and 31% decrease in length of stay. Similar trends were observed in the matched cohort with 74% reduction in odds of complications and 26% reduction in length of stay when ERAS was used., Conclusions: ERAS protocol decreases complications and reduces length of stay in bariatric patients., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Medical therapy is the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but surgical options are available and shown to be effective when medical management fails. There is no consensus for when a surgical evaluation is indicated. We set out to determine if the GERD-HRQL questionnaire scores correlate to objective findings found in patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery to predict when surgical consultation could be warranted., Methods: A prospectively gathered database was used for patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery from January 2014 to September 2020. Inclusion criteria required a diagnosis of GERD and comprehensive esophageal workup with the GERD-HRQL questionnaire, EGD, esophageal manometry, and ambulatory pH monitoring. Analysis of the GERD-HRQL scores was compared to objective endpoints to see correlation and predictability. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess relationship between the presence of objective findings and GERD-HRQL questionnaire scores., Results: There were 246 patients meeting inclusion criteria. There was no significant correlation between GERD-HRQL score and DeMeester score (correlation coefficient = 0.23), or presence of a hiatal hernia, regardless of size (p = 0.89). Patients with esophagitis had significantly higher average GERD-HRQL scores compared to those without esophagitis (40.1 ± 18.9 vs 30.4 ± 19.1, p < 0.0001). Patients with a score of 40 or greater had a 42% to 65% probability of having esophagitis versus a score of 30 or less, lowering the chances of having esophagitis to less than 35%., Conclusion: Usage of a GERD-HRQL questionnaire score can potentially show the correlation between subjective and objective findings in the workup of a patient for anti-reflux surgery. Specifically, patients with a GERD-HRQL score of 40 or greater have an increased probability of esophagitis compared to those with a score of 30 or less. Using these scores can help referring clinicians identify those patients failing medical therapy and allow for prompt referral for surgical evaluation., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Leaks of the esophagus and stomach are difficult to manage and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic therapy can manage these leaks without surgical intervention. Our goal is to create a scoring tool to aid in predicting the success of endoscopic therapy in these patients., Study Design: An IRB-approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients treated for gastrointestinal leaks from July 2013 to January 2021, including patients treated for esophageal and stomach leaks. Endpoints include success of leak closure for patients treated solely by endoscopic therapy (ET) compared with surgical therapy as failed endoscopic therapy (FET). A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify independent risk factors for predicting success of endoscopic therapy, and a scoring calculator was developed., Results: There were 80 patients (60 females) with a mean age of 50 years. The ET group included 59 patients (74%), whereas the FET group included 21 patients (26%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and timing of leak diagnosis were used. Multivariable analysis resulted in 4 variables associated with higher probability of successful endoscopic leak management without need for additional surgery. These included increased age, lower BMI, lack of previous bariatric surgery, and quicker identification of the leak. Consequently, a scoring nomogram was developed with values from 0 to 22., Conclusion: Our data show the development of a scoring calculator capable of quantifying the likelihood of success treating foregut and bariatric leaks with endoscopic therapies. This can be used clinically to guide treatment decisions., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The use of robotics in foregut surgery has become more prevalent in the United States over the last 10 years. We sought to find the differences in the clinical outcomes of robotic surgery compared with traditional laparoscopy in patients undergoing Heller myotomy., Materials and Methods: A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the span of 2010 to 2015. All patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic Heller myotomy were included. Weighted multivariable random intercept linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of robotic surgery on patient outcomes compared with laparoscopy., Results: There was a total of 11,562 patients with a median age of 54.2 years. Robotic Heller myotomy has a significantly decreased risk of overall complications for all centers (odds ratio=0.46; 95% confidence interval=0.29, 0.74). A subset analysis was performed looking specifically at high-volume centers (>20 operations per year), and overall complications remained lower in the robotic group. However, in high-volume centers, the robotic cohort did have a higher rate of esophageal perforation (2.7% vs. 0.8%, P<0.001). There was a higher length of stay in the laparoscopic Heller cohort (3.0 vs. 2.6 d, P=0.06) but higher overall charges in the robotic Heller cohort ($42,900 vs. $34,300, P=0.03)., Conclusions: Robotic Heller myotomy is associated with lower overall complications and improved outcomes compared with laparoscopic Heller myotomy, even in high-volume centers. Robotic Heller myotomy is associated with a higher rate of esophageal perforations in high-volume centers despite the reduction in overall complications., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Anastomotic leaks following foregut surgery pose a difficult scenario for surgeons. While definitive surgical options are more invasive and may result in diversion requiring subsequent surgeries, endoscopic management of these leaks has been shown to work as an alternative platform for management. An evolving option is endoscopic internal drainage. We have reviewed our experience using endoscopic internal drainage and report our outcomes., Materials and Methods: An institution review board approved prospectively gathered database was used to identify all patients undergoing endoscopic internal drainage following esophageal and gastric leaks. Patient demographics, sentinel operation causing the leak, and outcomes of therapy were collected. The rate of healing and complications with the drainage catheter in place were the primary endpoints., Results: Sixteen patients were identified (5 male, 11 female) that underwent endoscopic internal drainage with a mean age of 48 and mean BMI of 30.8. Overall success rate was 69% (11/16), where 4 patients required a definitive surgery, and one healed with endoluminal vacuum therapy. Of the 4 failures, 1 patient required esophagojejunostomy, 2 patients required a fistulojejunostomy, and one required a partial gastrectomy. A total of 12 patients (75%) had a prior endoscopic procedure that was unsuccessful. The mean duration of drainage catheter in place was 48 days. While the catheter was in place, 4 patients were allowed minimal PO intake in conjunction with total parenteral nutrition or tube feeds. The rest of the patients were strict NPO with other means of nutrition. There were no complications with the drainage catheters and no deaths., Conclusion: Leaks following esophagogastric surgery are difficult to manage; however, endoscopic internal drainage has been shown to be effective. Duration of the technique should be around 6 to 8 weeks with nutritional support guided by the comfort of the managing clinician., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The use of robotic platforms in surgery is becoming increasingly common in both practice and residency training. In this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between robotic platforms and traditional laparoscopy in paraesophageal hernia repair., Methods: A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample for the period of 2010-2015. Adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent laparoscopic or robotic paraesophageal hernia repairs were included. Weighted multivariable random intercept linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of robotic surgery on patient outcomes., Results: A total of 168,329 patients were included in the study. The overall adjusted rate of complications was significantly higher in patients who underwent robotic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair compared to laparoscopic PEH OR (95% CI) = 1.17 (1.07, 1.27). Specifically, respiratory failure OR (95% CI) = 1.68 (1.37, 2.05) and esophageal perforation OR (95% CI) = 2.19 (1.42, 3.93) were higher in robotic PEH patients. A subset analysis was performed looking at high-volume centers (>20 operations per year), and, although the risk of complications was lower in the high volume centers compared to intermediate volume centers, complication rates were still significantly higher in the robotic surgery group compared to laparoscopic. Overall charges per surgery were significantly higher in the robotic group., Conclusion: Robotic PEH repair is associated with significantly more complications compared to laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair even in high-volume centers., (© 2021. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Background: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been recognized as an effective treatment option for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The feasibility of MSA in patients with prior gastric surgery has not been well established. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MSA in patients with prior gastric surgery including bariatric and other anti-reflux operations., Methods: A prospectively gathered registry approved by the institutional review board for patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery was retrospectively reviewed. All patients who underwent MSA were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of prior gastric surgeries compared to those without. Endpoints collected include differences between the two groups in their preoperative evaluation, perioperative course, and postoperative effectiveness., Results: A total of 103 patients underwent MSA where 82 patients (80%) had no prior gastric surgery and 21 patients (20%) had prior gastric surgery. The prior gastric surgery group included 10 patients with prior anti-reflux surgery, 11 patients with prior bariatric surgery. Perioperative factors were higher in the prior gastric surgery group including operating room time (135 min vs. 93 min, p =  < 0.001), number of beads used (16 vs. 14, p =  < 0.001), and percent of patients staying overnight (47% vs. 5%, p =  < 0.001). There was no difference in several factors of their preoperative evaluation including preoperative GERD-HRQL and RSI scores, hiatal hernia presence, or DeMeester score. Post-operative GERD-HRQL and RSI scores were not different as well as patient satisfaction, patients resuming PPI use, and device explant rate., Conclusions: This study demonstrates equivalent outcomes with integration of MSA in patients with prior gastric surgery in comparison to patients without prior gastric surgery. However, these surgeries are longer, require larger devices, and patients are more likely to stay overnight., (© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Staple line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoluminal techniques, including stent placement and endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVAC), have become viable options to treat these patients without the need for additional surgery. The purpose of this study was to define the conditions where certain endoscopic therapies are most likely to succeed compared to surgery., Methods: An IRB approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients treated for gastrointestinal leaks from July 2013 to March 2019. All patients who were treated for gastrointestinal leaks following LSG were included. Endpoints include success of leak closure and hospital-related morbidity for the patients treated solely by endoscopic only methods (EP) compared to the additional surgery group (SP)., Results: There were 39 patients (33 females; 6 males) with a median age of 45.9 years. The EP group included 23 patients (59%), whereas SP included 16 patients (31%). On average, the SP had longer days from sentinel surgery to our hospital admission (70 vs 41), a higher percentage of previous bariatric surgery prior to sentinel LSG (50% vs 17%), and a higher readmission rates following discharge (50% vs 39%). Total length of stay was also higher in the SP compared to the EP (45.4 vs 11). Using this data, a treatment algorithm was developed to optimally treat future patients who suffer from gastrointestinal leaks following LSG., Conclusions: Endoscopic therapies, such as EVAC, stent placement, internal drainage, and over-the-scope clips, have a higher chance of success if performed earlier to their sentinel surgery and if patients have had no prior bariatric surgeries. Patients who require additional surgery tend to have longer hospital stays and readmission rates. Using the treatment algorithm provided can help determine when endoscopic therapies are likely to succeed.

Introduction: The surgical gold standard for esophageal motility disorders is laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive flexible endoscopic alternative. We compare their intermediate-term outcomes., Methods: Data were collected on consecutive LHM and POEM patients treated for esophageal motility disorders from January 2015 to December 2019. All patients were invited for a comprehensive workup between 6 and 12 months post-myotomy including symptom evaluation, pH testing off medications, manometry, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Primary outcomes include swallowing function and development of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)., Results: There were 100 patients (46 LHM and 54 POEM). Patient demographics and presenting symptoms were comparable. Follow-up data were obtained from 49% of patients. Average length of follow-up for all patients was 10 months. Mean Eckardt scores for LHM decreased from 6.6 to 2.4 ( P < .05) and from 7.06 to 2.2 for POEM ( P < .05). Mean integrated relaxation pressure decreased from 22.8 preoperatively to 11 postoperatively in LHM patients and from 24.6 to 11.5 in POEM patients. POEM patients had a lower incidence of objective postoperative GERD with lower average DeMeester scores (20 vs 29.4) and a higher percentage of patients with a normal DeMeester score (47% vs 31%) compared to LHM patients. However, postoperative GERD health related quality of life scores (11.7 vs 14.1), the percent of patients on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (40% vs 53%), and frequency of grade C/D esophagitis (4.3% vs 5.6%) were lower in LHM patients., Conclusions: Intermediate-term symptom resolution and esophageal physiology are improved equally with both procedures. The development of postoperative GERD is equivalent.

Background and Objectives: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common disease and there is little known about the role family history plays in its disease process and incidence. Our study was designed to compare the patients with first degree relatives with and without the disease and see if there was any difference in patients needing antireflux surgery, the outcomes after antireflux surgery, and whether they needed redo surgery., Methods: An institutional review board approved registry for patients undergoing antireflux surgery at a single institution was used. Patients were asked specific questions about their family history of gastroesophageal reflux disease at their pre-operative visit. Patients with a family history and those without were compared., Results: There was no statistical difference between the patients with family history of gastroesophageal reflux disease for likelihood to undergo surgery, outcomes from surgery, or the need for redo surgery. There were more females than males in the study and there were more patients with a positive family history in the study than those without., Conclusion: Since there is no impact of family history of gastroesophageal reflux disease on antireflux surgery, patients can be counseled that their decision to undergo antireflux surgery is independent from the response of their first degree relatives., (© 2021 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons.)

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with Barrett esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and significantly impacts quality of life. Medical management is the first line therapy with surgical fundoplication as an alternative therapy. However, a small portion of patients who fail medical therapy are referred for surgical consultation. This creates a "gap" in therapy for those patients dissatisfied with medical therapy but are not getting referred for surgical consultation. Three procedures have been designed to address these patients. These include radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lower esophageal sphincter, transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and magnetic sphincter augmentation., Materials and Methods: A Pubmed literature review was conducted of all publications for RFA, TIF, and MSA. Four most common endpoints for the 3 procedures were compared at different intervals of follow-up. These include percent of patients off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), GERD-HRQL score, DeMeester score, and percent of time with pH <4. A second query was performed for patients treated with PPI and fundoplications to match the same 4 endpoints as a control., Results: Variable freedom from PPI was reported at 1 year for RFA with a weighted mean of 62%, TIF with a weighted mean of 61%, MSA with a weighted mean of 85%, and fundoplications with a weighted mean of 84%. All procedures including PPIs improved quality-of-life scores but were not equal. Fundoplication had the best improvement followed by MSA, TIF, RFA, and PPI, respectively. DeMeester scores are variable after all procedures and PPIs. All MSA studies showed normalization of pH, whereas only 4 of 17 RFA studies and 3 of 11 TIF studies reported normalization of pH., Conclusions: Our literature review compares 3 rival procedures to treat "gap" patients for gastroesophageal reflux disease with 4 common endpoints. Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to have the most reproducible and linear outcomes but is the most invasive of the 3 procedures. MSA outcomes most closely mirrors that of fundoplication., Competing Interests: S.G.L. is a consultant for Ethicon and Boston Scientific. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) could effectively treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who suffer primarily from atypical symptoms due to laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). MSA has been shown to treat typical symptoms of GERD with good success, but its effect on atypical symptoms is unknown., Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional review board-approved database was conducted for all patients who underwent MSA between January 2015 and December 2018. All patients had objective confirmation of GERD from ambulatory pH monitoring off anti-reflux medications (DeMeester score > 14.7). Symptoms were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively using GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) questionnaires., Results: There were 86 patients (38 males; 48 females) with a median age of 51.5 years. Total GERD HRQL scores improved from a mean of 38.79 to 6.53 (p < 0.01) and RSI scores improved from a mean of 20.9 to 8.1 (p < 0.01). Atypical symptoms evaluated from the RSI questionnaire include hoarseness, throat clearing, postnasal drip, breathing difficulties, and cough. All atypical symptoms were significantly improved at 1 year following MSA (p < 0.01). All three typical symptoms of heartburn, dysphagia, and regurgitation were significantly improved based on pre and postoperative GERD HRQL questionnaires (p < 0.02). Ninety-one percent of patients were off their PPI and dissatisfaction with their current therapy decreased from 95% preoperatively to 13% postoperatively., Conclusion: MSA is an effective treatment for typical and atypical GERD symptoms.

Introduction: Per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) is a promising new therapy in the treatment of gastroparesis, where the pyloric muscle is cut using an endoscopic tunneling technique. This study was designed to report outcomes from our initial experience and compare the rate of complications to the laparoscopic equivalent using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) risk calculator., Methods: Patients who underwent POP between August 2018 to May 2019 were prospectively followed in a database approved by the institutional review board. Preoperatively, patients were evaluated objectively with a 4-hour gastric emptying study (GES). Following POP, all patients were invited for repeat GES 3 months postoperatively. The same cohort was entered into the ACS risk calculator using laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LPM) as the selected procedure. Complication risk of LPM was then compared with the actual complication rate of POP., Results: There were 11 patients that met study criteria (median age 52). Sixty-four percent (7/11) of patients agreed to do repeat GES postoperatively. Of those, 6 of 7 (86%) had normal GES (<10% emptying at 4 h) and the mean improvement was 36.4%. All patients were entered into the ACS risk calculator in which LPM (CPT code 43800) was used as a control. The postoperative complication rate was less than the median predicted risk of LPM in all categories including overall complications (0% vs. 10.05%), return to the operating room, (0% vs. 2.68%), and sepsis (0% vs. 1.42%). The rate of readmission (9% vs. 6.29%, P=0.65) was higher in the POP group than LPM predicted. Length of stay for all patients was significantly shorter than predicted (1.8 vs. 4.6 d, P<0.001)., Conclusions: All POP patients had objective improvement in their GES and 86% had normal GES following this procedure. POP had significantly lower morbidity and reduced length of stay compared with that predicted of the laparoscopic equivalent using the ACS risk calculator., Competing Interests: S.G.L. is a consultant for Ethicon. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising minimally invasive therapy in the treatment of achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. A concern surrounding POEM is the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) postoperatively. This study was designed to report outcomes and identify risk factors for the development of postoperative GERD., Methods: Patients who underwent POEM between January 1, 2015 and December 12, 2019 were prospectively followed in an Institutional Review Board approved database. All patients were invited for a full comprehensive workup 6 months post-POEM including symptom scores, pH testing, manometry and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. In a retrospective review of this database, those who developed postoperative GERD were compared with those who did not., Results: There were 82 patients that met study criteria (median age 59). Indications for POEM include 35 type I achalasia, 16 type II achalasia, 21 type III achalasia and other spastic esophageal motility disorders, and 10 esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Mean Eckardt scores post-POEM were 2.67 compared with 6.79 pre-POEM (P<0.05). Mean integrated relaxation pressure improvement decreased from 27 to 13.1 (P<0.05). The presence of postoperative GERD was defined as an abnormal DeMeester score (>14.7) with pH testing off-medications or the presence of Grade C/D esophagitis on endoscopy. Thirty-five percent (29/82) of patients developed postoperative GERD following POEM. Negative predictive factors for the development of postoperative GERD include myotomy length and normal body mass index (BMI). Obesity (BMI>30) was a positive predictive risk factor in the development of GERD (P=0.029)., Conclusions: POEM provides symptomatic relief and reduced Eckardt scores in patient with achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. Patients who undergo POEM are at risk for developing gastroesophageal reflux disease especially in obese patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Enhancing cognitive load while performing a bimanual surgical task affects performance. Whether repeated training under this condition could benefit performance in an operating room was tested using a virtual reality simulator with cognitive load applied through two-digit math multiplication questions., Method: 11 subjects were randomized to Control, VR and VR + CL groups. After a pre-test, VR and VR + CL groups repeated the peg transfer task 150 times over 15 sessions with cognitive load applied only for the last 100 trials. After training, all groups took a post-test and two weeks later the retention test with and without cognitive load and the transfer task on a pig intestine of 150 cm long under cognitive load., Results and Conclusion: Mixed ANOVA analysis showed significant differences between the control and VR and VR + CL groups (p = 0.013, p = 0.009) but no differences between the VR + CL and the VR groups (p = 1.0). GOALS bimanual dexterity score on transfer test show that VR + CL group outperformed both Control and VR groups (p = 0.016, p = 0.03). Training under cognitive load benefitted performance on an actual surgical task under similar conditions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Drs. Sankaranarayanan, Wells, Leeds, Chauhan, Fleshman, Jones, De and Mr. Odlozil have no disclosures to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) of the lower esophageal sphincter is an effective alternative to Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgeons must be certified in patient selection, adequate mediastinal dissection, device sizing, and device implantation. This certification process is intended to ensure optimal outcomes and patient safety; however, for many key technical aspects of MSA, proper performance has not been clearly defined. The purpose of this study is to determine how often surgical experts agree on the technical aspects of the MSA procedure., Materials and Methods: A 12-question survey investigated various technical aspects of the MSA procedure. The survey was sent to all certified MSA surgical proctors. Consensus on individual questions was defined as ≥70% agreement among the responding surgeons., Results: The survey was sent to 37 certified MSA surgical proctors, 24 of whom responded (65%). The mean number of MSA procedures performed by the responders was 210. There was consensus on 4 of the 12 questions. The consensus was achieved indicating it is safe for MSA implantation in any size hiatal hernia, and that tension on the hiatal repair is not a factor to implant the MSA device. There was no consensus for 3 mediastinal dissection questions and only consensus on 2 of the 5 questions regarding MSA implantation. Once the device is implanted, there was no consensus for the appearance of the MSA device., Conclusions: There is a need for procedure standardization to improve teaching and to maintain excellent efficacy and safety outcomes when the device is used in the community., Competing Interests: S.G.L. is a consultant for Ethicon and Boston Scientific. The other author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a surgical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease using a ring of titanium beads to improve the function of the lower esophageal sphincter. Prior to implantation, a comprehensive preoperative esophageal workup is required to determine patient candidacy in an effort to reduce the dysphagia, dilation, and explantation rate of the device. This study was designed to assess the best predictors for these endpoints., Methods: A prospectively maintained IRB-approved database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing MSA implantation. Patients were divided into 3 groups, those that needed no intervention, those that needed medical intervention with oral steroids for reported dysphagia, and surgical intervention, which included endoscopic dilation and/or surgical explantation. Primary endpoints included preoperative objective and subjective testing from a comprehensive esophageal workup including intraoperative notation of number of beads on the device., Results: There were 99 patients eligible for the study with a mean age of 52 and mean follow-up of 10.2 months. Mean BMI was 27 and 59% were female. The no-intervention group had 59 patients, medical intervention group had 25 patients, and surgical intervention group had 15 patients. Preoperative esophageal manometry findings, pH testing off medications, endoscopic and radiologic evaluation showed no difference between the 3 groups. No differences were seen in preoperative subjective evaluations based on GERD-HRQL or RSI scores. There was no difference in average number of beads on the device between the 3 groups., Conclusion: A comprehensive esophageal workup is important to confirm the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and rule out other esophageal pathology. However, this study shows that a preoperative comprehensive esophageal workup does not predict which patients will develop dysphagia or require either medical or surgical interventions following MSA implantation.

Background: Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVAC) is an emerging procedure used to treat anastomotic leaks and/or perforations that would otherwise require surgery. The aim of this study was to determine time to proficiency in EVAC and the cost effectiveness of the procedure., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained IRB approved database for all patients undergoing EVAC after esophageal and gastric complications between October 2013 and December 2017. Proficiency was determined by obtaining predicted estimates and analyzing the point at which average procedure time plateaued based on case volume. Total cost was calculated based on supplies and location where the procedure was performed., Results: There were 50 patients (17 males, 33 female), with a mean age of 52.1 years. EVAC was placed in 23 (46%) patients with esophageal injuries and 28 (56%) with gastric injuries. Two advanced endoscopists performed all EVAC procedures in this study (1 surgeon, 1 gastroenterologist). The average procedure time for all patients was 43.5 min and the average wheel in/wheel out time for all patients was 75.6 min. Analysis of the trend based on average procedure times for EVAC revealed that proficiency was obtained after 10 cases. Total cost of the procedure is significantly lower in the GI lab compared to the operating room ($4528 vs. $11889). The majority of EVAC were performed in the GI lab (62%) compared to the operating room (38%)., Conclusion: Successful outcomes in managing anastomotic leaks or intestinal perforations non-operatively has led to an increased interest in EVAC. For advanced endoscopists, time to proficiency is approximately 10 cases. Performing the procedure in the GI lab has a 2.5 reduction in total cost compared to the operating room.

Perforations and leaks of the gastrointestinal tract are difficult to manage and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, endoscopic approaches have been applied with varying degrees of success. Most recently, the use of endoluminal vacuum therapy has been used with high success rates in decreasing both morbidity and mortality. Under an IRB-approved prospective registry that we started in July 2013, we have been using endoluminal vacuum therapy to treat a variety of leaks throughout the GI tract. The procedure uses an endosponge connected to a nasogastric tube that is endoscopically guided into a fistula cavity in order to facilitate healing, obtain source control, and aid in reperfusion of the adjacent tissue with debridement. Endoluminal vacuum therapy has been used on all patients in the registry. Overall success rate for healing the leak or fistula is 95% in the esophagus, 83% in the stomach, 100% in the small bowel, and 60% of colorectal cases. The purpose of this report is to review the history of endoluminal wound vacuum therapy, identify appropriate patient selection criteria, and highlight "pearls" of the procedure. This article is written in the context of our own clinical experience, with a primary focus on a "How I Do It" technical description.

Background: Laparoscopic removal of noneroded nonadjustable gastric bands (NAGBs) may lead to major life-threatening complications. A minimally invasive approach involving endoscopic removal by induced mucosal erosion with a stent (IMES) has been used in a few publications to remove NAGBs., Objective: To examine a minimally invasive endoscopic approach to removal of a NAGB., Setting: A large tertiary/quaternary referral hospital., Methods: We report 4 patients that underwent IMES at our institution and present a literature review of published cases. The procedure includes using an endoscopically placed fully covered stent through the NAGB stricture to cause erosion of the mucosa where the stent is putting direct pressure. After a predetermined length of time, the stent is removed with the NAGB and without a laparoscopic or open procedure. Primary endpoint for our cohort was successful removal to the NAGB with IMES. Secondary endpoints included interval of time to retrieval of the stent, complications from IMES, presenting symptoms, and type of NAGB. These endpoints were then compared with previous publications indicating the use of IMES., Results: Three of 4 patients were female with a mean age of 64.5 years. All patients had the NAGB successfully removed with IMES. The mean time for NAGB and stent removal after insertion was 17.5 days. No major complications were noted. Two patients had post-IMES strictures and were managed by balloon dilation., Conclusion: Endoscopic removal of NAGBs is a safe and feasible procedure for NAGB removal and can be used in place of laparoscopic surgery.

Objective: Resident education is evolving as more cases move from open to minimally invasive. Many programs struggle to incorporate minimally invasive surgery education due to increased operative time and higher cost when residents participate. The aim of this paper is to examine if the implementation of a robotics curriculum enhances minimally invasive surgical training., Design: A retrospective review of all ventral and inguinal hernia cases performed from March 2013 to November 2017 was conducted to determine operative technique utilized (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) and resident involvement. The study cohorts surrounded the introduction of a robotic curriculum in July 2014, and the time frames examined were labeled as Before-robotic, After-robotic, and re-visited examination was done labeled Long-term., Setting: The study was performed at a large quaternary care referral center., Participants: The participants were all patients who underwent ventral and inguinal hernia repairs on the general surgery, transplant, or colorectal service., Results: Before-robotic had 739 hernia cases performed: 642 (87%) open, 93 (13%) laparoscopic, and 4 (0.5%) robotic. After-robotic had 682 hernia cases performed: 529 (78%) open, 54 (8%) laparoscopic, and 99 (15%) robotic. Long-term had 792 hernia cases performed: 603 (76%) open, 25 (3%) laparoscopic, and 164 (21%) robotic. The general trend was towards an institutional decrease in open cases and an increase in robotic hernia cases. Resident participation in the robotics cases across all levels increased after the implementation of the robotic curriculum., Conclusions: Implementation of a robotic curriculum can enhance minimally invasive surgical training experience for general surgery resident education., (Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To investigate the efficacy of primary and rescue endoluminal vacuum (EVAC) therapy in the treatment of esophageal perforations and leaks., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively gathered, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved database of EVAC therapy patients at our center from July 2013 to September 2016., Results: In all, 13 patients were treated for esophageal perforations or leaks. Etiologies included iatrogenic injury (n = 8), anastomotic leak (n = 2), Boerhaave syndrome (n = 1), and bronchoesophageal fistula (n = 2). In total, 10 patients underwent primary treatment and three were treated with rescue therapy. Mean Perforation Severity Scores (PSSs) in the primary and rescue treatment groups were 7 and 10, respectively. Average defect size was 2.4 (range: 0.5-6) cm. The rescue group had a shorter mean time to defect closure (25 vs. 33 days). In all, 12 of 13 defects healed. One death occurred following the implementation of comfort care. One therapy-specific complication occurred. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was longer in the rescue group (72 vs. 53 days); however, the intensive care unit (ICU) duration was similar between groups. Totally, 10 patients (83%) resumed an oral diet after successful defect closure., Conclusion: Utilized as either a primary or rescue therapy, EVAC therapy appears to be beneficial in the management of esophageal perforations or leaks.

Background: Perforations and anastomotic leaks of the gastrointestinal tract are severe complications, which carry high morbidity and mortality and management of these is a multi-disciplinary challenge. The use of endoluminal vacuum (EVAC) therapy has recently proven to be a useful technique to manage these complications. We report our institution's experience with this novel technique in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis., Methods: This is a retrospective review of an IRB approved registry of all EVAC therapy patients from July 2013 to December 2016. A total of 55 patients were examined and 49 patients were eligible for inclusion: 15 esophageal, 21 gastric, 3 small bowel, and 10 colorectal defects. The primary endpoint was closure rate of the GI tract defect with EVAC therapy., Results: Fifteen (100%) esophageal defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 27 days consisting of an average of 6 endosponge changes every 4.8 days. Eighteen (86%) gastric defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 38 days with a mean of 9 endosponge changes every 5.3 days. Three (100%) small bowel defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 13.7 days with a mean of 2.7 endosponge changes every 4.4 days. Six (60%) colorectal defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 23.2 days, consisting of a mean of 6 endosponge changes every 4.0 days. There were two deaths, which were not directly related to EVAC therapy and occurred outside the measured 30-day mortality., Conclusion: Our experience demonstrates that EVAC therapy is feasible and effective for the management of gastrointestinal perforations/leaks throughout the GI tract and can be considered as a safe alternative to surgical intervention in select cases.

Achalasia is a rare disorder that has several treatment options. The gold standard of treatment is a surgical myotomy called a laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). More recently, an endoscopic myotomy has become an option as well, called per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). An achalasia registry was queried for patients undergoing either LHM or POEM at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas. Patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative data points, and Eckardt scores were collected. The patients were further stratified into their follow-up intervals, immediate postoperative and long-term follow-up, to assess surgical success. A subset analysis was done for success of treatment for patients who had redo surgery versus those undergoing the procedure for the first time. There were 12 patients in the POEM group and 11 patients in the LHM group. Both groups demonstrated mean lower esophageal sphincter pressures with failure to relax. Procedure length and hospital length of stay were similar between the two groups. There were three adverse events in each group, but none altered the patient's postoperative clinical course. Eckardt scores, used to assess success of the surgery, were 82% for POEM patients and 66% for LHM patients after 6 months. The outcomes for POEM and LHM in our early experience are similar to those reported in the literature for high-volume centers managing achalasia.

Background: Laparoscopic suturing has proved to be a challenging skill to master which may prevent surgical procedures from being started, or completed, in a minimally invasive fashion. The aim of this study is to compare the learning curves between traditional laparoscopic techniques with a novel suturing device., Methods: In this prospective single blinded nonrandomized controlled crossover study, we recruited 19 general surgery residents ranging from beginner (PGY1-2, n = 12) to advanced beginner (PGY3-5, n = 7). They were assigned to perform a knot tying and suturing task using either Endo360 or traditional laparoscopic technique (TLT) with needle holders before crossing over to the other method. The proficiency standards were developed by collecting the data for task completion time (TCT in seconds), dots on target (DoT in numbers), and total deviation (D in mm) on 5 expert attending surgeons (mean ± 2SD). The test subjects were "proficient" when they reached these standards 2 consecutive times., Results: Number of attempts to complete the task was collected for Endo360 and TLT. A significant difference was observed between mean number of attempts to reach proficiency for Endo360 versus TLT ( P = .0027) in both groups combined, but this was not statistically significant in the advanced beginner group. TCT was examined for both methods and demonstrated significantly less time to complete the task for Endo360 versus TLT ( P < .0001). There were significantly less DoT for Endo360 as compared with TLT ( P < .0001), which was also associated with significantly less D ( P < .0001) indicating lower accuracy with Endo360. However, no significant difference was observed between the groups for increasing number of trials for both DoT and D., Conclusions: This novel suturing device showed a shorter learning curve with regard to number of attempts to complete a task for the beginner group in our study, but matched the learning curve in the advanced beginner group. With regard to time to complete the task, the device was faster in both groups.

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy has become a popular weight loss procedure, but it is associated with staple line leak resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Current management options range from endoscopic techniques (predominantly stent placement) to surgical intervention., Objective: The purpose of this study was to recognize endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy as a viable option for use in anastomotic leaks of sleeve gastrectomies., Setting: This study took place at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Texas., Methods: Retrospective and prospectively gathered registries for use of E-Vac therapy were queried to identify 35 patients. Using upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 9 of these patients were identified with a staple line leak from laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). E-Vac therapy was used to resolve the leak., Results: Nine patients were treated with E-Vac therapy. Eight of 9 patients were admitted from outside hospitals with a mean of 61 days (5-233) after LSG. During treatment, an average of 10.3 procedures per patient was done to place and exchange the Endo-SPONGE. All 9 patients had resolution of leaks confirmed by upper gastrointestinal series, after undergoing E-Vac therapy for an average of 50 days. Six of 9 patients had laparoscopic procedures before their admission. During admission, 5 of the 9 patients had self-expanding metal stents placed with failure of leak resolution. Discharge disposition included 2 patients sent to rehabilitation facilities, 1 death not attributable to E-Vac, and 6 patients went home., Conclusion: E-Vac therapy is a viable option for patients with staple line leak after LSG., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Upper intestinal leaks and perforations are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the growing experience using endoscopically placed stents, the treatment of these leaks and perforations remain a challenge. Endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy is a novel treatment that has been successfully used in Germany to treat upper gastrointestinal leaks and perforations. There currently are no reports on its use in the USA., Methods: E-Vac therapy was used to treat 11 patients with upper gastrointestinal leaks and perforations from September 2013 to September 2014. Five patients with leaks following sleeve gastrectomy were excluded from this study. A total of six patients were treated with E-Vac therapy; these included: (n = 2) iatrogenic esophageal perforations, (n = 1) iatrogenic esophageal and gastric perforations, (n = 1) iatrogenic gastric perforation, (n = 1) gastric staple line leak following a surgical repair of a traumatic gastric perforation, and (n = 1) esophageal perforation due to an invasive fungal infection. Four patients had failed an initial surgical repair prior to starting E-Vac therapy., Results: All six patients (100 %) had complete closure of their perforation or leak after an average of 35.8 days of E-Vac therapy requiring 7.2 different E-Vac changes. No deaths occurred in the 30 days following E-Vac therapy. One patient died following complete closure of his perforation and transfer to an acute care facility due to an unrelated complication. There were no complications directly related to the use of E-Vac therapy. Only one patient had any symptoms of dysphagia. This patient had severe dysphagia from an esophagogastric anastomotic stricture prior to her iatrogenic perforations. Following E-Vac therapy, her dysphagia had actually improved and she could now tolerate a soft diet., Conclusions: E-Vac therapy is a promising new method in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal leaks and perforations. Current successes need to be validated through future prospective controlled studies.

Background: Obesity has been linked to many adverse health consequences, including breast cancer; however, the impact on clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes has yet to be clearly defined., Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients treated at a single institution for invasive breast cancer from 2000-2008 comparing two groups: nonobese (body mass index of <30) and obese (body mass index of ≥ 30) patients. Continuous variables, categorical variables, and survival data were analyzed., Results: Of 1352 total patients, 76% were classified as nonobese and 24% were obese. When comparing age, obese patients presented less frequently than nonobese patients <50 years old (10% vs. 90%), and when comparing patients >50 years old (18% vs. 82%, P = 0.0019). Obese patients were more likely to present with disease detected by imaging when compared to nonobese patients (67% vs. 56%, P = 0.0006). Obese patients had larger tumors (1.7 cm vs. 1.4 cm, P < 0.001) and higher rates of lymph node (LN) metastases (31% vs. 25%, P = 0.026). On multivariate analysis, obesity was associated with nonpalpable tumors, larger tumors, a higher incidence of LN metastasis, lower incidence of Her2 positivity, lower incidence of multifocality, and less likely to undergo reconstruction after mastectomy., Conclusions: Obese patients clinically present at older ages with mammographically detected breast cancer at more advanced stages than nonobese patients. Strategies to encourage screening among the obese patient population are important.