Search

Introduction: Recent 3-dimensional technology advancements have resulted in new techniques to improve the accuracy of intraoperative transfer. This study aimed to validate the accuracy of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) customized surgical cutting guides and fixation plates on mandibular repositioning surgery performed in isolation or combined with simultaneous maxillary repositioning surgery., Methods: Sixty patients who underwent mandibular advancement surgery by the same surgeon were retrospectively evaluated by 3-dimensional surface-based superimposition. A 3-point coordinate system (x, y, z) was used to identify the linear and angular discrepancies between the planned movements and actual outcomes. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the outcomes between the mandible-only and the bimaxillary surgery groups with significance at P <0.05. Pearson correlation coefficient compared planned mandible advancement to the outcome from advancement planned. The centroid, which represents the mandible as a single unit, was computed from 3 landmarks, and the discrepancies were evaluated by the root mean square error (RMSE) for clinical significance set at 2 mm for linear discrepancies and 4° for angular discrepancies., Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the planned and actual position of the mandible in either group when considering absolute values of the differences. When considering raw directional data, a statistically significant difference was identified in the y-axis suggesting a tendency for under-advancement of the mandible in the bimaxillary group. The largest translational RMSE for the centroid was 0.77 mm in the sagittal dimension for the bimaxillary surgery group. The largest rotational RMSE for the centroid was 1.25° in the transverse dimension for the bimaxillary surgery group. Our results show that the precision and clinical feasibility of CAD-CAM customized surgical cutting guides and fixation plates on mandibular repositioning surgery is well within clinically acceptable parameters., Conclusion: Mandibular repositioning surgery can be performed predictably and accurately with the aid of CAD-CAM customized surgical cutting guides and fixation plates with or without maxillary surgery., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Few studies have evaluated the predictability of expansion with Invisalign for the current SmartTrack material., Methods: Pretreatment, predicted, and posttreatment digital models from Invisalign's ClinCheck software were obtained for 57 adult patients with a planned arch expansion of at least 3 mm. Arch width measurements were collected using a software measuring tool (MeshLab), Invisalign's arch width table, and the centroid of the clinical crown. Data for 30 patients were remeasured for each method to assess intrarater reliability. Predictability of expansion was calculated by comparing the amount of achieved expansion to predicted expansion., Results: The predictability of expansion across centroids for the maxillary teeth was: 72.2% canines, 78.9% first premolars, 81.1% second premolars, 63.5% first molars, and 41.5% second molars. The predictability of expansion across centroids for the mandibular teeth was: 82.3% canines, 93.0% first premolars, 87.7% second premolars, 79.8% first molars, and 42.9% second molars. The average expansion was significantly different from that predicted for each type of tooth in both the maxilla and mandible. Both underexpansion and overexpansion were observed. Arch width measurement reliability for each employed method was as follows: MeshLab (average error 0.197 mm); calculated centroids (0.002 mm); ClinCheck arch width table (0.000 mm)., Conclusions: On average, the amount of predicted expansion is not achieved with the Invisalign system and varies according to tooth type and arch. Discretion is required when overcorrecting to compensate for expansion inaccuracy. Both underexpansion and overexpansion were observed; further investigation into factors influencing underexpansion and overexpansion is required., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of custom osteosynthesis plates increased the accuracy of proximal segment position following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in a cohort of 30 patients when compared to a control group of 25 patients who had surgery with conventional plates. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon between October 2015 and December 2017. Post-surgical cone beam computed tomography scans were segmented using Mimics Innovation Suite (Materialise NV), and surface-based superimposition was achieved using ProPlan CMF (Materialise NV). However, there was a tendency for the rotational error to be smaller in the custom group than in the control group. The root mean square error in both groups and for all variables fell within clinical parameters of 2 mm and 4°. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that customized mandibular fixation plates do not necessarily improve the accuracy of the proximal segments post-surgically; however they may be of benefit in individual patients., (Copyright © 2021 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.)