Search

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of different manufacturers' immunoassays for the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1)-to-placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio with that of a point-of-care (PoC) test for glycosylated fibronectin (GlyFn) in women with suspected pre-eclampsia (PE)., Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, double-blinded, non-interventional study of East Asian women with a singleton pregnancy who presented with hypertension with or without clinical features of PE after 20 weeks' gestation between January 2020 and March 2022. Maternal serum samples were collected at the time of presentation, and subsequent management followed the departmental protocol, based on gestational age, severity of hypertension, fetal condition and presence of severe PE features. Women diagnosed with PE at presentation were excluded. PE was diagnosed according to the 2018 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy classification. Levels of sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured using the Cobas e411 (Roche Diagnostics), BRAHMS KRYPTOR (ThermoFisher Scientific) and iMAGIN 1800 (Ningbo Aucheer) platforms. GlyFn levels were measured using the Lumella™ GlyFn PoC test (DiabetOmics Inc.). The predictive performance of each test to rule out PE within 7 days and rule in PE within 28 days from the date of presentation was assessed. Based on the PROGNOSIS study, a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of ≤ 38 on the Roche platform was used to predict the absence of PE within 7 days. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was classified as high or low using platform-specific thresholds equivalent to a Roche sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of 38, which were derived using Passing-Bablok regression. GlyFn was categorized as high or low using two reported clinical management thresholds (263 μg/mL and 510 μg/mL)., Results: Overall, 236 women with suspected PE were included, of whom 70 (29.7%) were diagnosed with PE; 36 (51.4%) and 70 (100%) developed PE within 7 days and 28 days, respectively. Eighty-eight (37.3%) women had a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of > 38 on the Roche platform, 79 (33.5%) women had a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of > 55 on the KRYPTOR platform and 96 (40.7%) women had a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of > 40 on the iMAGIN 1800 platform. Furthermore, 62 (26.3%) and four (1.7%) women had a GlyFn level of > 263 μg/mL and > 510 μg/mL, respectively. The negative predictive value (NPV) of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio measured on the Roche, KRYPTOR and iMAGIN 1800 platforms to rule out PE within 7 days after presentation was 83.3%, 82.0% and 82.9%, respectively, while that for GlyFn > 263 μg/mL and > 510 μg/mL was 82.6% and 70.4%, respectively. The corresponding positive predictive values (PPV) to rule in PE within 28 days after presentation were 50.5%, 52.3% and 46.7%, respectively, for the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, and 35.4% and 50.0%, respectively, for GlyFn > 263 μg/mL and > 510 μg/mL., Conclusions: The predictive performance of different manufacturers' assays for the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio to rule in and rule out PE were similar once standardized to a common threshold. Our findings suggest that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and GlyFn using a cut-off of 263 μg/mL can both be utilized to rule out PE within 7 days after assessment, with a moderate NPV. The PPV for ruling in PE within 28 days remains poor. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Background: This trial aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a first-trimester screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia in Asia., Methods: Between August 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, this multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial included maternity/diagnostic units from 10 regions in Asia. The trial started with a period where all recruiting centers provided routine antenatal care without study-related intervention. At regular 6-week intervals, one cluster was randomized to transit from nonintervention phase to intervention phase. In the intervention phase, women underwent first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia using a Bayes theorem-based triple-test. High-risk women, with adjusted risk for preterm preeclampsia ≥1 in 100, received low-dose aspirin from <16 weeks until 36 weeks., Results: Overall, 88.04% (42 897 of 48 725) of women agreed to undergo first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia. Among those identified as high-risk in the intervention phase, 82.39% (2919 of 3543) received aspirin prophylaxis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia between the intervention and non-intervention phases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59 [95% CI, 0.91-2.77]). However, among high-risk women in the intervention phase, aspirin prophylaxis was significantly associated with a 41% reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia (aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.37-0.92]). In addition, it correlated with 54%, 55%, and 64% reduction in the incidence of preeclampsia with delivery at <34 weeks (aOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23-0.93]), spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.22-0.92]), and perinatal death (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.91]), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of aspirin-related severe adverse events., Conclusions: The implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia. However, low-dose aspirin effectively reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia by 41% among high-risk women. The screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is highly accepted by a diverse group of women from various ethnic backgrounds beyond the original population where the strategy was developed. These findings underpin the importance of the widespread implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia on a global scale., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03941886., Competing Interests: L.C.P. has received speaker fees and consultancy payments from Roche Diagnostics and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. In addition, she has received in-kind contributions from Roche Diagnostics, Revvity Inc (formerly PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences), Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ningbo Aucheer Biological Technology Co, Ltd, and GE HealthCare. D.S.S. has received in-kind contributions from Revvity Inc, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roche Diagnostics, Diabetomics, and Ningbo Aucheer Biological Technology Co, Ltd. R.K.P. is chief executive officer of Ritz Medical Co Ltd, a genetic testing company, and holds shares in and receives executive compensation from it. The other authors report no conflicts.

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) model for first-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia in a large Asian population., Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study in 10 935 participants with singleton pregnancies attending for routine pregnancy care at 11-13 +6  weeks of gestation in seven regions in Asia between December 2016 and June 2018. We applied the AI+ML model for the first-trimester prediction of preterm pre-eclampsia (<37 weeks), term pre-eclampsia (≥37 weeks), and any pre-eclampsia, which was derived and tested in a cohort of pregnant participants in the UK (Model 1). This model comprises maternal factors with measurements of mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and serum placental growth factor (PlGF). The model was further retrained with adjustments for analyzers used for biochemical testing (Model 2). Discrimination was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The Delong test was used to compare the AUC of Model 1, Model 2, and the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing risk model., Results: The predictive performance of Model 1 was significantly lower than that of the FMF competing risk model in the prediction of preterm pre-eclampsia (0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.87 vs. 0.86, 95% CI 0.811-0.91, P = 0.019), term pre-eclampsia (0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.80 vs. 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.83, P = 0.006), and any pre-eclampsia (0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.81 vs. 0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.84, P < 0.001). Following the retraining of the data with adjustments for the PlGF analyzers, the performance of Model 2 for predicting preterm pre-eclampsia, term pre-eclampsia, and any pre-eclampsia was improved with the AUC values increased to 0.84 (95% CI 0.80-0.89), 0.77 (95% CI 0.73-0.81), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.83), respectively. There were no differences in AUCs between Model 2 and the FMF competing risk model in the prediction of preterm pre-eclampsia (P = 0.135) and term pre-eclampsia (P = 0.084). However, Model 2 was inferior to the FMF competing risk model in predicting any pre-eclampsia (P = 0.024)., Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that following adjustment for the biochemical marker analyzers, the predictive performance of the AI+ML prediction model for pre-eclampsia in the first trimester was comparable to that of the FMF competing risk model in an Asian population., (© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Objectives: Well-established clinical practice for assessing progress in labor involves routine abdominal palpation and vaginal examination (VE). However, VE is subjective, poorly reproducible and painful for most women. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of systematically integrating transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal position, parasagittal angle of progression (psAOP), head-perineum distance (HPD) and sonographic cervical dilatation (SCD) to monitor the progress of labor in women undergoing induction of labor (IOL). We also aimed to determine if ultrasound can reduce women's pain during such examinations., Methods: Women were recruited as they presented for IOL in three maternity units. Ultrasound assessments were performed in 100 women between 37 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks' gestation. A baseline combined transabdominal and transperineal scan was performed, including assessment of fetal biometry, umbilical artery and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler, amniotic fluid index, fetal spine and occiput positions, psAOP, HPD, SCD and cervical length. Intrapartum scans were performed instead of VE, unless there was a clinical indication to perform a VE, according to protocol. Participants were asked to indicate their level of pain by verbally giving a pain score between 0 and 10 (with 0 representing no pain) during assessment. Repeated measures data were analyzed using mixed-effect models to identify significant factors that affected the relationship between psAOP, HPD, SCD and mode of delivery., Results: A total of 100 women were included in the study. Of these, 20% delivered by Cesarean section, 65% vaginally and 15% by instrumental delivery. There were no adverse fetal or maternal outcomes. A total of 223 intrapartum ultrasound scans were performed in 87 participants (13 women delivered before intrapartum ultrasound was performed), with a median of two scans per participant (interquartile range (IQR), 1-3). Of these, 76 women underwent a total of 151 VEs with a median of one VE per participant (IQR, 0-2), with no significant difference between vaginal- or Cesarean-delivery groups. After excluding those with epidural anesthesia during examination, the median pain score for intrapartum scans was 0 (IQR, 0-1) and for VE it was 3 (IQR, 0-6). Cesarean delivery was significantly associated with a slower rate of change in psAOP, HPD and SCD., Conclusions: Comprehensive transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment can be used to assess progress in labor and can reduce the level of pain experienced during examination. Ultrasound assessment may be able to replace some transabdominal and vaginal examinations during labor. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

In the management of shoulder dystocia, it is often recommended to start with external maneuvers, such as the McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure, followed by internal maneuvers including rotation and posterior arm delivery. However, this sequence is not based on scientific evidence of its success rates, the technical simplicity, or the related complication rates. Hence, this review critically evaluates the success rate, technique, and safety of different maneuvers. Retrospective reviews showed that posterior arm delivery has consistently higher success rates (86.1%) than rotational methods (62.4%) and external maneuvers (56.0%). McRoberts maneuver was thought to be a simple method, however, its mechanism is not clear. Furthermore, McRoberts position still requires subsequent traction on the fetal neck, which presents a risk for brachial plexus injury. The 2 internal maneuvers have anatomic rationales with the aim of rotating the shoulders to the wider oblique pelvic dimension or reducing the shoulder width. The techniques are not more sophisticated and requires the accoucher to insert the correct hand (according to fetal face direction) through the more spacious sacro-posterior region and deep enough to reach the fetal chest or posterior forearm. The performance of rotation and posterior arm delivery can also be integrated and performed using the same hand. Retrospective studies may give a biased view that the internal maneuvers are riskier. First, a less severely impacted shoulder dystocia is more likely to have been managed by external maneuvers, subjecting more difficult cases to internal maneuvers. Second, neonatal injuries were not necessarily caused by the internal maneuvers that led to delivery but could have been caused by the preceding unsuccessful external maneuvers. The procedural safety is not primarily related to the nature of the maneuvers, but to how properly these maneuvers are performed. When all these maneuvers have failed, it is important to consider the reasons for failure otherwise repetition of the maneuver cycle is just a random trial and error. If the posterior axilla is just above the pelvic outlet and reachable, posterior axilla traction using either the accoucher fingers or a sling is a feasible alternative. Its mechanism is not just outward traction but also rotation of the shoulders to the wider oblique pelvic dimension. If the posterior axilla is at a higher sacral level, a sling may be formed with the assistance of a long right-angle forceps, otherwise, more invasive methods such as Zavanelli maneuver, abdominal rescue, or symphysiotomy are the last resorts., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. It is important to identify women who are at high risk of developing this disorder in their first trimester of pregnancy to allow timely therapeutic intervention. The use of low-dose aspirin initiated before 16 weeks of gestation can significantly reduce the rate of preterm preeclampsia by 62 %. Effective screening recommended by the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) consists of a combination of maternal risk factors, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and placental growth factor (PLGF). The current model has detection rates of 90 %, 75 %, and 41 % for early, preterm, and term preeclampsia, respectively at 10 % false-positive rate. Similar risk assessment can be performed during the second trimester in all pregnant women irrespective of first trimester screening results. The use of PLGF, UtA-PI, sFlt-1 combined with other investigative tools are part of risk assessment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest L.C.P. has received speaker fees and consultancy payments from Roche Diagnostics and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. In addition, she has received in-kind contributions from Roche Diagnostics, PerkinElmer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ningbo Aucheer and GE Healthcare. Other authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine whether maternal serum glycosylated fibronectin (GlyFn) level in the first trimester increases the sensitivity of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) triple test, which incorporates mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index and placental growth factor, when screening for pre-eclampsia (PE) in an Asian population., Methods: This was a nested case-control study of Chinese women with a singleton pregnancy who were screened for PE at 11-13 weeks' gestation as part of a non-intervention study between December 2016 and June 2018. GlyFn levels were measured retrospectively in archived serum from 1685 pregnancies, including 101 with PE, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and from 448 pregnancies, including 101 with PE, using a point-of-care (POC) device. Concordance between ELISA and POC tests was assessed using Lin's correlation coefficient and Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analyses. GlyFn was transformed into multiples of the median (MoM) to adjust for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. GlyFn MoM was compared between PE and non-PE pregnancies, and the association between GlyFn MoM and gestational age at delivery with PE was assessed. Risk for developing PE was estimated using the FMF competing-risks model. Screening performance for preterm and any-onset PE using different biomarker combinations was quantified by area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and detection rate (DR) at a 10% fixed false-positive rate (FPR). Differences in AUC between biomarker combinations were compared using the DeLong test., Results: The concordance correlation coefficient between ELISA and POC measurements was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.88). Passing-Bablok analysis indicated proportional bias (slope, 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.14)), with POC GlyFn being significantly higher compared with ELISA GlyFn. ELISA GlyFn in non-PE pregnancies was independent of gestational age at screening (P = 0.11), but significantly dependent on maternal age (P < 0.003), weight (P < 0.0002), height (P = 0.001), parity (P < 0.02) and smoking status (P = 0.002). Compared with non-PE pregnancies, median GlyFn MoM using ELISA and POC testing was elevated significantly in those with preterm PE (1.23 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001 and 1.18 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001, respectively) and those with term PE (1.26 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001 and 1.22 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001, respectively). GlyFn MoM was not correlated with gestational age at delivery with PE (P = 0.989). Adding GlyFn to the FMF triple test for preterm PE increased significantly the AUC from 0.859 to 0.896 (P = 0.012) and increased the DR at 10% FPR from 64.9% (95% CI, 48.7-81.1%) to 82.9% (95% CI, 66.4-93.4%). The corresponding DRs at 10% FPR for any-onset PE were 52.5% (95% CI, 42.3-62.5%) and 65.4% (95% CI, 55.2-74.5%), respectively., Conclusions: Adding GlyFn to the FMF triple test increased the screening sensitivity for both preterm and any-onset PE in an Asian population. Prospective non-intervention studies are needed to confirm these initial findings. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Background: Immunomodulation is observed in human parturition. However, data from longitudinal studies for the prelabor phase and the active phase of labor are lacking, and no study had compared the immune responses during labor between nulliparous and multiparous women., Objective: This study aimed to investigate the temporal changes of immune biomarkers in maternal blood from the prelabor phase to the latent and active phases of labor and to compare the dynamic changes between nulliparous and multiparous women., Study Design: A prospective case-control study was conducted on women who had induction of labor at term followed by vaginal delivery. Maternal blood was serially collected at 3 consecutive time points: (1) before the onset of labor, (2) during the latent phase of labor, and (3) during the active phase of labor. Peripheral immune cells were measured by 4-color flow cytometry, and the plasma concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were measured by cytometric bead arrays. A longitudinal comparison was made to assess the dynamic changes in inflammatory parameters over 3 time points in nulliparous and multiparous women, respectively, and a cross-sectional comparison was made between nulliparous and multiparous women., Results: A total of 40 women, including 20 nulliparous and 20 multiparous, were included in the study. Prelabor circulating levels of macrophage inflammatory protein-1β, monokine induced by gamma interferon, and interferon gamma-induced protein-10 were higher in multiparous women than in nulliparous women. In the latent phase of labor, the innate immune system in both groups responded with increases in neutrophils and interleukin 6, and the nulliparous women showed a more pronounced response. During the active phase of labor, such innate immune response continued with both groups, with additional increases in natural killer cells, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interleukin 8, and interleukin 10. Conversely, the adaptive immune system in nulliparous women showed a reduction in both cytotoxic and helper T cells, whereas the adaptive immune system in multiparous women only had a reduction in helper T cells, showing a smaller reduction., Conclusion: Innate and adaptive immune responses partake in immunomodulation during human parturition. Nulliparous and multiparous women showed different responses in their blood levels of immune cells and biomarkers during the different phases of labor., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare.