Search

Your search keyword '"Lechien, Jérôme R."' showing total 531 results
Start Over Author "Lechien, Jérôme R."
531 results on '"Lechien, Jérôme R."'

10. Tele-rehabilitation in voice disorders during the pandemic: a consensus paper from the French Society of Phoniatrics and Laryngology

Author

Baudouin, Robin, Hans, Stephane, Guiche, Marion, Binet, Anais, Circiu, Marta P., Crevier-Buchman, Lise, Morsomme, Dominique, Finck, Camille, Rutigliano, Paola, Rodriguez, Alexandra, Louvet, Nina-Sophie, Allouche, Johan, Julien-Laferriere, Aude, Vialatte de Pemille, Gregoire, Bousard, Laura, de Mones, Erwan, Crestani, Sabine, Giovanni, Antoine, Gallant, Nadine, and Lechien, Jérôme R.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. Candidates to Barbed Reposition Pharyngoplasty

Author

Vicini, Claudio, Lechien, Jerome R., Eplite, Angelo, Perrone, Tiziano, Magliulo, Giuseppe, de Vincentiis, Marco, Greco, Antonio, Cocuzza, Salvatore, La Mantia, Ignazio, Maniaci, Antonino, Passali, Desiderio, Eesa, Mohamed, Hendawi, Ehsan, Iannella, Giannicola, Vicini, Claudio, editor, Salamanca, Fabrizio, editor, and Iannella, Giannicola, editor

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. One hundred fifty years of total laryngectomies

Author

Hans, Stéphane, primary, Baudouin, Robin, additional, Circiu, Marta P., additional, Couineau, Florent, additional, Rigal, Tiffany, additional, Remacle, Marc J., additional, De Vito, Andrea, additional, Cammaroto, Giovanni, additional, Crevier-Buchman, Lise, additional, and Lechien, Jérôme R., additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

36. Features of Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Patients With Dysphonia

Author

Lechien, Jerome R., Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos M., Cabaraux, Pierre, Mat, Quentin, Huet, Kathy, Harmegnies, Bernard, Horoi, Mihaela, Le Bon, Serge Daniel, Rodriguez, Alexandra, Dequanter, Didier, Hans, Stéphane, Crevier-Buchman, Lise, Hochet, Baptiste, Distinguin, Lea, Chekkoury-Idrissi, Younes, Circiu, Marta, El Afia, Fahd, Barillari, Maria Rosaria, Cammaroto, Giovanni, Fakhry, Nicolas, Michel, Justin, Radulesco, Thomas, Martiny, Delphine, Lavigne, Philippe, Jouffe, Lionel, Descamps, Géraldine, Journe, Fabrice, Trecca, Eleonora M.C., Hsieh, Julien, Delgado, Irene Lopez, Calvo-Henriquez, Christian, Vergez, Sebastien, Khalife, Mohamad, Molteni, Gabriele, Mannelli, Giuditta, Cantarella, Giovanna, Tucciarone, Manuel, Souchay, Christel, Leich, Pierre, Ayad, Tareck, and Saussez, Sven

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

39. Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment‐10 (RSA‐10).

Author

Lechien, Jérôme R., De Marrez, Lisa G., Finck, Camille, and Saussez, Sven

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate the Reflux Sign Assessment‐10 (RSA‐10) for documenting the physical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). Methods: Patients with LPRD at the hypopharyngeal‐esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH monitoring and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from two European hospitals. Three experienced otolaryngologists rated RSA‐10 in patients and controls for assessing internal validity. RSA‐10 was rated within a 7‐day period to assess test‐retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α in patients and controls. Convergent validity was evaluated through a correlation analysis between RSA‐10 and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Interrater reliability was evaluated by comparing the RSA‐10 evaluations of the three otolaryngologists through Fleiss kappa. Pre‐ to posttreatment change of RSA‐10 was evaluated to assess responsiveness to change. The RSA‐10 thresholds were examined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Fifty‐five patients completed the pre‐ to posttreatment evaluations from January 2020 to December 2023. A total of 115 asymptomatic individuals completed the study. RSA‐10 reported high internal consistency reliability (α = 0.822) and test‐retest reliability (rs = 0.725). The RSA‐10 scores of patients were significantly higher than those of controls (p = 0.001), suggesting high internal validity. RSA‐10 was significantly correlated with the RFS (rs = 0.771). The interrater reliability was adequate for sub‐ and total RSA‐10 scores (k = 0.708). RSA‐10 significantly improved from baseline to 3‐month posttreatment (p = 0.001). An RSA‐10 > 13 may be suggestive of LPRD. Both RSA‐10 > 13 and Reflux Symptom Score‐12 > 11 were associated with a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 97.3%. Conclusion: The RSA‐10 is a reliable and valid clinical instrument for documenting the most prevalent laryngeal and extra‐laryngeal findings associated with LPRD. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3981–3988, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results