Search

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonic eosinophilia, an enigmatic finding often referred to as eosinophilic colitis (EoC), is a poorly understood condition. Whether EoC is a distinct disease or a colonic manifestation of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is undetermined. METHODS: Subjects with EoC (n=27) and controls (normal [NL, n=20], Crohn disease [CD, n=14]) were enrolled across sites associated with the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR). EoC was diagnosed as colonic eosinophilia (ascending ≥100, descending ≥85, sigmoid ≥65 eosinophils/high-power field) with related symptoms. Colon biopsies were subjected to RNA sequencing. Associations between gene expression and histologic features were analyzed with Spearman correlation; operational pathways and cellular constituents were computationally derived. RESULTS: We identified 987 differentially expressed genes (EoC transcriptome) between EoC and NL (>1.5-fold change, P < .05). Colonic eosinophil count correlated with 31% of EoC transcriptome, most notably with CCL11 and CLC (r=0.78 and 0.77, P < .001). Among EoC and other EGIDs, there was minimal transcriptomic overlap; and minimal evidence of a strong allergic type 2 immune response compared with other EGIDs. Decreased cell-cycle and increased apoptosis in EoC compared with NL were identified by functional enrichment analysis and immunostaining using Ki-67 and cleaved caspase-3. Pericryptal circumferential eosinophil collars were associated with the EoC transcriptome (P < .001). EoC transcriptome-based scores were reversible with disease remission and differentiated EoC from IBD, even after controlling for colonic eosinophil levels (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: We established EoC transcriptomic profiles, identified mechanistic pathways, and integrated findings with parallel IBD and EGID data. These findings establish EoC as a distinct disease compared with other EGIDs and IBD, thereby providing a basis for improving diagnosis and treatment.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) can progress to fibrostenosis by unclear mechanisms. Herein, we investigated gene dysregulation in fibrostenotic EoE, its association with clinical parameters and specific pathways, and the functional consequences.Esophageal biopsies from subjects with EoE were collected across 11 Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers sites (n = 311) and 2 independent replication cohorts (n = 83). Inclusion criteria for fibrostenotic EoE were endoscopic rings, stricture, and/or a history of dilation. Endoscopic, histologic, and molecular features were assessed by the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score, EoE Histology Scoring System, EoE Diagnostic Panel, and RNA sequencing. Esophageal endothelial TSPAN12 expression and functional effects on barrier integrity and gene expression were analyzed in vitro.TSPAN12 was the gene most correlated with fibrostenosis (r = -0.40, P.001). TSPAN12 was lower in fibrostenotic EoE and correlated with EoE Endoscopic Reference Score, EoE Diagnostic Panel, and EoE Histology Scoring System (r = 0.34-0.47, P.001). Lower TSPAN12 associated with smaller esophageal diameter (r = 0.44, P = .03), increased lamina propria fibrosis (r = -0.41, P.001), and genes enriched in cell cycle-related pathways. Interleukin (IL)-13 reduced TSPAN12 expression in endothelial cells. Conversely, anti-IL-13 therapy increased TSPAN12 expression. TSPAN12 gene silencing increased endothelial cell permeability and dysregulated genes associated with extracellular matrix pathways. Endothelial cell-fibroblast crosstalk induced extracellular matrix changes relevant to esophageal remodeling.Patients with fibrostenotic EoE express decreased levels of endothelial TSPAN12. We propose that IL-13 decreases TSPAN12, likely contributing to the chronicity of EoE by promoting tissue remodeling through fibroblast-endothelial cell crosstalk.

Recent advances in rare disease research are accelerated by the work of consortia that have been supported by the National Institutes of Health. Development of such consortia rely on multidisciplinary relationships and engagement with patient advocacy groups, as well as the National Institutes of Health and industry and academic partners. In this rostrum we present the development of such a process that focuses on eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Principal investigators, patient advocacy groups, research assistants, and trainees work together to perform natural history studies that promote clinical trial readiness tools, conduct clinical trials, train a new generation of investigators, and perform innovative pilot studies.

BACKGROUND Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a T-cell-mediated disease that is caused by specific foods and results in esophageal dysfunction. Existing allergy testing modalities are not helpful when attempting to identify EoE-causal foods necessitating empiric food elimination and recurrent endoscopy. The goal of this study was to identify and compare allergen-specific immune features that can be assayed in a minimally invasive manner to predict clinical food allergy in EoE. METHODS We obtained blood samples from control subjects (n = 17), subjects with clinical EoE milk allergy (n = 17), and subjects with immunoglobulin E-mediated milk allergy (n = 9). We measured total and milk-specific plasma immunoglobulin G (IgG)4 levels and peripheral memory CD4+ T helper (TH ) cell proliferation and cytokine production after stimulation with endotoxin-depleted milk proteins. Sensitivity and specificity for predicting clinical EoE milk allergy were calculated and compared between approaches. RESULTS Total and milk-specific IgG4 levels were not significantly different between control subjects and subjects with clinical EoE milk allergy. Stimulation with milk proteins caused TH lymphocytes from subjects with clinical EoE milk allergy to proliferate more (%P1 of 38.3 ± 4.6 vs. 12.7 ± 2.8, p

Background Anxiety can be excessive and impairing in children with food allergy (FA). There is no accepted condition-specific measure of anxiety for this population. Objective To evaluate the validity and reliability of new child- and parent-rated measures of FA-related anxiety in youth. Methods Items for the Scale of Food Allergy Anxiety (SOFAA) were developed by a cognitive-behavioral therapist specializing in pediatric anxiety, in consultation with FA medical professionals and parents of children with FA. Dyads (n = 77) of children with FA (aged 8-18 years; 42.9% females) and their parents (95.5% females) completed full versions of the SOFAA (21 items; scored 0-4) via online survey. Results The child-rated SOFFA-C mean score was 29.1 ± 18.3; the parent-rated SOFAA-P mean score was 33.9 ± 16.1. Higher scores indicate higher reported anxiety. Coefficient alphas were 0.94 and 0.92. Factor analyses and item-response theory analyses supported the creation of the 14-item SOFAA-C-brief and the 7-item SOFAA-P-brief, accounting for 93% and 79% of total variance, respectively. Correlations revealed strong convergence between child- and parent-report for both the full (r = 0.85) and brief (r = 0.79) versions. Correlations with a generic measure of child anxiety (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders) and the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire ranged from moderate to strong, whereas those with a generic measure of child eating problems (About Your Child’s Eating) were weak to moderate, supporting convergent and divergent validity. Scores of 48 dyads who completed SOFAAs at time 2 (mean, 16.0 days) appeared stable over time, supporting test-retest reliability. Conclusions The 21-item SOFAA-C and SOFAA-P are reliable and valid scales for measuring condition-specific anxiety in youth with FA. As shorter screening measures, the SOFAA-C-brief and the SOFAA-P-brief are also reliable and valid.