Search

BACKGROUND: Patient understanding of plan of care is associated with positive outcomes in ambulatory settings. In hospital medicine settings, patient-physician agreement on plan of care (concordance) has been limited and difficult to improve. This study examined the impact of adding a hospitalist to interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) on physician-patient-nurse concordance and the relationship between concordance and outcomes. METHODS: IDR were conducted by core teams made up of unit-based nurses, a case manager, and a pharmacist. Over time, with cohorting, hospitalists were included in IDR (hospitalist IDR) for some patients assigned to unit-based hospitalists. In developing hospitalist IDR, researchers emphasized using an IDR checklist, including a patient communication plan. Patient-nurse-physician interviews were used to assess concordance in the domains of diagnosis, tests and procedures, and expected discharge date. Using two-hospitalist review, agreement was rated as none, partial, or complete, and a total concordance score was calculated for each patient in both IDR groups. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the relationship between concordance, IDR type, patient factors, and utilization outcomes. RESULTS: For 658 patients, the mean concordance score was 11.71 out of a possible 18. There was no difference in concordance between hospitalist and core IDR groups (11.68 vs. 11.84, p = 0.7). Higher total concordance score was associated with lower lengths of stay (p < 0.001) and readmission rates (p = 0.001). Total concordance had a negative association with patient age (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Concordance did not change with IDR type. Higher concordance appears to be related to positive utilization outcomes. Future studies are needed to evaluate potential interventions to improve concordance.

Objectives The price of analogue insulin has increased dramatically, making it unaffordable for many patients and insurance carriers. By contrast, human synthetic insulins are available at a fraction of the cost. The objective of this study was to examine whether patients with financial constraints were more likely to use low-cost human insulins compared with higher-cost analogue insulins and to determine whether outcomes differ between users of each type of insulin. Study design Retrospective cohort study. Methods Analysis of 4 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey was performed. Adults with diabetes who reported use of insulin were included. The primary outcome was use of human insulin or analogue insulin. The dependent variable was self-reported financial constraints, a composite variable. Secondary analysis examined the association between use of human vs analogue insulin and patient outcomes. Results Of 22,263 eligible respondents, 698 (3.1%) reported use of insulin and the type of insulin used, representing 485,228 patients nationally. Patients with 1 or more financial risk factors were more likely to use human insulin compared with patients without any financial risk factors (88.5% vs 76.7%; P = .014). There was no association between use of human vs analogue insulin on diabetic or other patient outcomes among patients regardless of financial risk. Conclusions Patients with financial risk factors may be more likely to use low-cost human synthetic insulins compared with insulin analogues. Outcomes were similar, even when stratified by financial risk.

Background: Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are especially vulnerable to respiratory infections caused by the coronavirus. The underlying effect of cardiovascular comorbidities on patients with COVID-19, however, remains to be sufficiently understood. Methods: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients from a state-wide large health care system with completed historical clinical conditions during March - June of 2020 were included in this study. The impact of CVD on the mortality, resources utility including the uses of intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilator, length of stay (LOS) and financial burden of COVID-19 inpatients were examined. Logistic analysis was applied to analyze the relationship between CVD and mortality, and non-parametric methods were used to evaluate the impact of CVD on resources utility. Random forest method was used to rank the importance of risk factors. Results: Among 811 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 228 (28.11%) were placed in ICU, 105 (12.95%) spent on ventilators, and there were 94 deaths (11.59%). The mean LOS was 11.93 ± 11.26 (SD, standard deviation), mean time a patient in an ICU was 2.41 ± 5.49 days, and mean ventilator time was 1.29 ± 4.62 days. The mean charge of a patient was $55242 ± 71742) with inter-quarter range of $44124. Age, gender, and race were the top 3 factors of mortality and utilities. Patients who present with heart failure vs. those who do not, have increased mortality (21.47% vs 8.97%; odds ratio [OR], 2.00 (95% CI: 1.25-3.21; P=0.004), longer LOS (12.97 ±10.09 vs. 11.61±11.46), p=0.18), higher ICU usage ( 3.32 ± 6.04 vs. 2.14 ±5.26, p=0.02) and ICU requiring ventilator (1.86 ± 4.90 vs. 1.15 ± 4.56, p=0.09), and significant higher charge ($ 66175 ± 68773 vs $ 50736 ±64142, mean difference $15439± 65193 with 95% CI: $4537-26340, p=0.01). Similar results were shown for patients with coronary artery disease or arrhythmia. Patients with hypertension vs those who do not, have increased mortality (14.81% vs. 4.92%; OR=3.22 (95% CI: 1.76-5.90, p=0.01), but the impact was not significant after adjusted by age, race and gender. Conclusions: Among COVID-19 hospitalized patients with established cardiovascular disease, there was a worse survival and adverse utility outcomes in hospital resources and financial charges.

To examine whether a care transitions program, Bridges, differentially reduced rehospitalizations among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on insurance status and zip code poverty level.Retrospective observational cohort.We examined data from a single health system in Delaware, collected as part of a care transitions program for patients who underwent PCI from 2012 to 2015 compared with an unmatched historical control cohort from 2010 to 2011. Socioeconomic status was assessed by insurance status and zip code-level poverty data. Patients were divided into tertiles based on the proportion of their zip code of residence living under 100% of the federal poverty level. Rehospitalization rates were analyzed by negative binomial regression and included interaction terms to examine differential effects of Bridges by insurance and poverty level.There were 4638 patients representing 5710 hospitalizations: 3212 in the historical control and 2498 in the Bridges cohort. Among patients with Medicaid who received the Bridges intervention, those living in the wealthiest zip codes were 15.5% less likely to be rehospitalized than patients with Medicare and 9.4% less likely than patients with commercial insurance (P = .04). However, patients with Medicaid who lived in the poorest zip codes and those with dual Medicare/Medicaid status had higher rates of rehospitalization post intervention.The Bridges intervention was associated with improved rehospitalization rates for Medicaid patients compared with those with Medicare or commercial insurance within Delaware's wealthier communities. Care transitions programs may differentially affect Medicaid patients based on the wealth of the communities in which they reside.

This survey study evaluates the frequency of sales of over-the-counter insulin at US pharmacies.

It is widely hypothesized that improvement in transitions of care will reduce unplanned hospital readmissions. However, the association between the Care Transitions Measure, the national quality metric for transitions of care and readmission risk, has not been established. We aimed to determine the association between the Care Transition Measure and readmission. This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Convenience sample of 2,963 patients enrolled in the “Bridging the Divides” program, a longitudinal care management program for patients with coronary revascularization, from 2013 to 2014. Of these, 1594 (54 %) patients completed a post-discharge Care Transition Measure questionnaire. Care Transition Measure scores were collected by trained research staff blinded to study hypothesis, by telephone, within 30 days of discharge. Higher Care Transition Measure scores reflect a higher quality transition of care. 30-day readmission was measured. Of the1594 patients that completed the Care Transition Measure survey, 1216 (76 %) received percutaneous coronary intervention and 378 (24 %) received coronary artery bypass grafting. Mean Care Transition Measure scores were significantly lower among patients who had a prior admission (77.2 vs. 82.1, p

Background Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized under observation status are subject to cost-sharing with no spending limit under Medicare Part B. Because low-income status is associated with increased hospital use, there is concern that such beneficiaries may be at increased risk for high use and out-of-pocket costs related to observation care. Our objective was to determine whether low-income Medicare beneficiaries are at risk for high use and high financial liability for observation care compared with higher-income beneficiaries. Methods We performed a retrospective, observational analysis of Medicare Part B claims and US Census Bureau data from 2013. Medicare beneficiaries with Part A and B coverage for the full calendar year, with 1 or more observation stay(s), were included in the study. Beneficiaries were divided into quartiles representing poverty level. The associations between poverty quartile and high use of observation care and between poverty quartile and high financial liability for observation care were evaluated. Results After multivariate adjustment, the risk of high use was higher for beneficiaries in the poor (Quartile 3) and poorest (Quartile 4) quartiles compared with those in the wealthiest quartile (Quartile 1) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.31; AOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.33). The risk of high financial liability was higher in every poverty quartile compared with the wealthiest and peaked in Quartile 3, which represented the poor but not the poorest beneficiaries (AOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.24). Conclusions Poverty predicts high use of observation care. The poor or near poor may be at highest risk for high liability.

BACKGROUND Medicare beneficiaries admitted under observation status must pay for postacute inpatient rehabilitation (PAIR) services, out of pocket, at potentially prohibitive costs. OBJECTIVE To determine if there is an unmet need for PAIR among Medicare observation patients and if this care is associated with longer hospital stay and increased rehospitalization. DESIGN/SETTING Observational study using electronic medical record and administrative data from a regional health system. PATIENTS 1323 community-dwelling Medicare patients admitted under observation status. MEASUREMENTS Summary statistics were calculated for demographic and administrative variables. Physical therapy (PT) and case management recommendations for a representative sample of 386 medical records were reviewed regarding need for PAIR services. Linear regression was used to measure the association between PT recommendation and hospital length of stay, adjusting for ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) diagnosis, age, sex, and provider. Chi-square test was used to determine the association between PT recommendation and 30-day hospital revisit. RESULTS Of the 1323 study patients, 11 (0.83%) were discharged to PAIR facilities. However, 17 (4.4%) of the 386 patients whose charts were reviewed received a recommendation for this care. Adjusted mean hospital stay was longer (P ⟨ 0.001) for patients recommended for rehabilitation (75.9 h) than for patients with no PT needs (46.8 h). In addition, the 30-day hospital revisit rate was higher (P = 0.037) for the patients who had been recommended for rehabilitation (52.9%, 9/17) than for those who had not (25.4%, 30/118). CONCLUSIONS Medicare observation patients' potential need for PAIR services is 5- to 6-fold higher than their use of these services. Observation patients recommended for this care may have worse outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:168-172.

The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the United States is high, especially with regard to readmission rates and annual cost of health care. However, to date, there is little consensus about which clinical interventions have the greatest impact on reducing COPD readmissions. We reviewed literature in PubMed/MEDLINE to identify interventions that have the greatest impact on COPD readmissions, stratified by four clinical domains: patient risk factors, longitudinal care, acute care, and post-discharge care. Patients with more severe disease and fewer social supports are most vulnerable to COPD readmission. Chronic treatment with combined inhaled corticosteroids-long-acting beta-agonists or tiotropium as well as early antibiotic treatment during acute hospitalization decrease readmission rates. After discharge, the greatest effect on readmission rates was seen with early pulmonary rehabilitation, outpatient follow-up within 30 days, and enrollment in an integrated care program. While the standard of care in reducing COPD readmission rates remains to be elucidated, a multi-faceted approach that targets high-risk populations is likely to be most effective.

Current policy promotes health center professional training and pipeline programs as solutions to bolster primary care workforce in shortage areas, despite the paucity of evidence.We analyzed data from US health centers we surveyed from March to June 2010, merged with federal health center data, to estimate associations between health center training and pipeline programs and provider recruitment and retention.Of the 976 surveyed, 391 health centers responded. Health centers with career ladder programs compared to those without had higher adjusted rates of no/minimal difficulty in recruitment of primary care providers. (17.6% vs. 10.6%; p=.01) and close to double the adjusted rates of reporting no/minimal difficulty in retention of primary care providers (39.4% vs. 21.2%; p=.0001).There remains a need for further evaluation of health professional programs in order to expand models, such as career ladder programs, that demonstrate effectiveness in improving the primary care workforce in shortage areas.

Primary care site may play an important role in cardiovascular disease prevalence; however, the distribution of risk factors and outcomes across care sites is not known. In this study, a cross-sectional analysis of 21,778 adult participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 1999 to 2008) using multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the relation between site of usual care and disease prevalence. Patients' self-reported histories of several chronic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia), awareness of chronic conditions, and associated cardiovascular events (angina, coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke) were examined. After adjustment for demographic and health care utilization characteristics, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of diabetes or hypercholesterolemia among patients receiving usual care at private doctors' offices, hospital outpatient clinics, community-based clinics, and emergency rooms (ER). However, participants without usual sources of care and those receiving usual care at ERs had significantly lower awareness of their chronic conditions than participants at other sites. The odds of having a history of each of the adverse cardiovascular events ranged from 2.21 to 4.18 times higher for patients receiving usual care at ERs relative to private doctors' offices. In conclusion, participants who report using ERs as their usual sites of care are disproportionately more likely to have histories of poor cardiovascular outcomes and are more likely to be unaware of having hypertension or hypercholesterolemia. As health care reform takes place and millions more begin seeking care, it is imperative to ensure access to longitudinal care sites designed for continuous disease management.

Impact of Resident Workload and Handoff Training on Patient Outcomes Stephanie K. Mueller, MD, Stephanie A. Call, MD, MSPH, Furman S. McDonald, MD, MPH, Andrew J. Halvorsen, MS, Jeffrey L. Schnipper, MD, MPH, LeRoi S. Hicks, MD, MPH Brigham and Women’s-Faulkner Hospital Academic Hospitalist Service, Boston, Mass; Division of General Internal edicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass; Division of General Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Divisions of General and Hospital Internal Medicine and Office of Educational Innovations, Internal Medicine Residency, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Division of Hospital Medicine, UMass Memorial Healthcare, Worcester; Department of Quantitative Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

Although racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to be involved with the criminal justice system than whites in the U.S.A., critical scientific gaps exist in our understanding of the relationship between the criminal justice system and the persistence of racial/ethnic health disparities. Individuals engaged with the criminal justice system are at risk for poor health outcomes. Furthermore, criminal justice involvement may have direct or indirect effects on health and health care. Racial/ethnic health disparities may be exacerbated or mitigated at several stages of the criminal justice system. Understanding and addressing the health of individuals involved in the criminal justice system is one component of a comprehensive strategy to reduce population health disparities and improve the health of our urban communities.

Minorities have a higher prevalence of hypertension, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, which contributes to racial/ethnic disparities in morbidity and mortality in the United States. Many modifiable health behaviors have been associated with improved blood pressure control, but it is unclear how racial/ethnic differences in these behaviors are related to the observed disparities in blood pressure control. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted among 21 489 US adults aged >20 years participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2001 to 2006. Secondary analyses were conducted among those with a self-reported diagnosis of hypertension. Blood pressure control was defined as systolic values P P P

The relative effectiveness of strategies to recruit minority patients, populations traditionally difficult to engage in research, for focus groups is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of all peer-reviewed focus group studies targeting Black and/or Hispanic participants with diabetes, hypertension, asthma, and/or cardiovascular disease reported in Pubmed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL from January 1993 through August 2009. Reviewers extracted data on each study's characteristics, methods, and outcomes. Forty-five studies were eligible. While most described recruitment strategies, only 21 presented any metric of their success in recruiting participants. Among studies with high recruitment success rates, no discernable trends regarding effectiveness of recruitment strategies were found, largely due to variation in reporting of the use of incentives and follow-up mechanisms. Increased rigor is necessary for describing methodology of focus group research in the literature. It is incumbent upon researchers to ensure clear and detailed methodology in qualitative articles.

Despite widely documented variations in health care outcomes by insurance status, few nationally representative studies have examined such disparities in the inpatient setting.To determine whether there are insurance-related differences in hospital care for 3 common medical conditions.Retrospective database analysis of 154,381 adult discharges (age 18-64 years) with a principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, or pneumonia from the 2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).For each diagnosis, we compared in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost per hospitalization for Medicaid and uninsured patients with the privately insured.Compared with the privately insured, in-hospital mortality among AMI and stroke patients was significantly higher for the uninsured (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.24-1.85] for AMI and 1.49 [1.29-1.72] for stroke) and among pneumonia patients was significantly higher for Medicaid recipients (1.21 [1.01-1.45]). Excluding patients who died during hospitalization, LOS was consistently longer for Medicaid recipients for all 3 conditions (adjusted ratio 1.07, 95% CI [1.05-1.09] for AMI, 1.17 [1.14-1.20] for stroke, and 1.04 [1.03-1.06] for pneumonia), although costs were significantly higher for Medicaid recipients for only 2 of the 3 conditions (adjusted ratio 1.06, 95% CI [1.04-1.09] for stroke and 1.05 [1.04-1.07] for pneumonia).In this nationally representative study of working-age Americans hospitalized for 3 common medical conditions, significantly lower in-hospital mortality was noted for privately insured patients compared with the uninsured or Medicaid recipients. Interventions to reduce insurance-related gaps in inpatient quality of care should be investigated.

Racial/ethnic disparities exist in the prevalence and outcomes of diabetes and hypertension in the U.S. A better understanding of the health beliefs and experiences of non-Hispanic Blacks and Latinos with these diseases could help to improve their care outcomes.We conducted eight focus groups stratified by participants' race/ethnicity, with 34 non-Hispanic Blacks and Latinos receiving care for diabetes and/or hypertension in one of 7 community health centers in Boston. Focus groups were designed to determine participants' levels of understanding about their chronic illness, assess their barriers to the management of their illness, and inquire about interventions they considered may help achieve better health outcomes.Among both groups of participants, nutrition (traditional diets), genetics and environmental stress (e.g. neighborhood crime and poor conditions) were described as primary contributors to diabetes and hypertension. Unhealthy diets were reported as being a major barrier to disease management. Participants also believed that they would benefit from attending groups on management and education for their conditions that include creative ways to adopt healthy foods that complement their ethnic diets, exercise opportunities, and advice on how to prevent disease manifestation among family members.Interactive discussion groups focused on lifestyle modification and disease management should be created for patients to learn more about their diseases. Future research evaluating the effectiveness of interactive diabetes and hypertension groups that apply patient racial/ethnic traditions should be considered.

Nationally, a higher proportion of the medically underserved than of the general population suffer from hypertension. Poorer adherence to recommended therapies (includ- ing medication regimens, salt intake reduction, and regular visits with provider) has been linked to poorer blood pressure control. To identify whether differences in adherence are associated with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic characteristics, we administered a sur- vey to 141 African American and non-Hispanic White hypertensive patients within two hospital-based clinics in an urban setting in the Northeast U.S. There were no differences in adherence to follow-up appointments or dietary recommendations between racial/ ethnic or income groups. However, there were differences between groups in adherence to medication regimens, with African Americans and lower-income groups significantly more likely to be non-adherent to medication regimens. When treating patients or implementing interventions aimed at improving adherence, special attention should be paid to African Americans and patients from low-income communities.

Background— Consultation with cardiologists may improve the quality of ambulatory care and reduce disparities for patients with heart disease. We assessed the use of cardiology consultations and the associated quality by race/ethnicity, gender, insurance status, and site of care. Methods and Results— In a retrospective cohort, we examined electronic records of 9761 adults with coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure (CHF) receiving primary care at practices affiliated with 2 academic medical centers during 2000 to 2005. During this period, 79.6% of patients with coronary artery disease and 90.3% of patients with CHF had a cardiology consultation. In multivariate analyses, women were less likely to receive a consultation than men for both conditions (coronary artery disease: hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.93; CHF: hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99). Women also had 15% fewer follow-up consultations than men ( P P P =0.01 and P =0.04, respectively). In adjusted analyses, consultation was associated with better processes of care compared with no consultation ( P P Conclusions— Among ambulatory patients with coronary artery disease or CHF, women and those at community health centers have less access to cardiologists. Consultation is associated with better quality of care and narrows the gender gap in quality.

Background: The Community, Health Center, and Academic Medicine Partnership Project (CHAMPP) is a partnership between medical researchers, community health centers (CHCs), and a community advisory committee focused on reducing cardiovascular morbidity related to hypertension and diabetes for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations in Boston, Massachusetts. Objective: We conducted site visits at seven participating CHCs, located in Boston. The visits were to solicit health center staff opinions about site-specific barriers and enabling factors for optimum preventative cardiovascular care for racial/ethnic minority patients receiving hypertension and diabetes care at their centers. Methods: Site visits included a tour of each health center and a series of directed interviews with center personnel. Site visit notes were reviewed to identify themes that emerged during the course of each site visit. A summary matrix was developed for each health center, which included information regarding the most salient and persistent themes of the visit. Results: Site visits uncovered several patient-, provider-, CHC-, and community-based factors that either facilitate or hinder optimal care of chronic disease patients. Commonly referenced barriers included the need for improved patient adherence to provider recommendations; insufficient time for providers to address complex health issues presented by patients and the need for a broader range of healthier food options in surrounding communities. Interactive patient groups and community health workers (CHWs) have been well received when implemented. Conclusion: Recommendations included adopting case management as a part of usual care for chronic disease patients; additionally, widespread implementation of CHWs may to provide a platform for more comprehensive care for patients.

Significant racial and ethnic differences along several dimensions of patients'experiences with hospital care have been previously documented. However, the relationship between these differences and possible differences in processes of care has not been well described.We conducted focus groups with 37 black and Hispanic men and women who had recently been discharged from either medical or obstetrical services at an urban academic medical center to assess which dimensions of these patients' experiences with care were most important in determining overall levels of satisfaction.Differences were found between Hispanics and blacks in the factors that influence their overall positive and negative experiences. Participants identified two themes that influence experiences with hospital care that are not commonly examined in many patient satisfaction instruments: availability and quality of translators, and attitudes of social workers and nursing staff.Our findings suggest that hospitals should pursue hiring a culturally diverse work force and should collect racial and ethnically specific data about satisfaction with care including satisfaction with availability of social workers and interpreters.

Although community health centers (CHCs) provide primary health services to the medically underserved and poor, limited access to off-site specialty services may lead to poorer outcomes among underinsured CHC patients. This study evaluates access to specialty health services for patients receiving care in CHCs, using a survey of medical directors of all federally qualified CHCs in the United States in 2004. Respondents reported that uninsured patients had greater difficulty obtaining access to off-site specialty services, including referrals and diagnostic testing, than did patients with Medicaid, Medicare, or private insurance.

The Health Disparities Collaboratives of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) were designed to improve care in community health centers, where many patients from ethnic and racial minority groups and uninsured patients receive treatment.We performed a controlled preintervention and postintervention study of community health centers participating in quality-improvement collaboratives (the Health Disparities Collaboratives sponsored by the HRSA) for the care of patients with diabetes, asthma, or hypertension. We enrolled 9658 patients at 44 intervention centers that had participated in the collaboratives and 20 centers that had not participated (external control centers). Each intervention center also served as an internal control for another condition. Quality measures were abstracted from medical records at each health center. We created overall quality scores by standardizing and averaging the scores from all of the applicable measures. Changes in quality were evaluated with the use of hierarchical regression models that controlled for patient characteristics.Overall, the intervention centers had considerably greater improvement than the external and internal control centers in the composite measures of quality for the care of patients with asthma and diabetes, but not for those with hypertension. As compared with the external control centers, the intervention centers had significant improvements in the measures of prevention and screening, including a 21% increase in foot examinations for patients with diabetes, and in disease treatment and monitoring, including a 14% increase in the use of antiinflammatory medication for asthma and a 16% increase in the assessment of glycated hemoglobin. There was no improvement, however, in any of the intermediate outcomes assessed (urgent care or hospitalization for asthma, control of glycated hemoglobin levels for diabetes, and control of blood pressure for hypertension).The Health Disparities Collaboratives significantly improved the processes of care for two of the three conditions studied. There was no improvement in the clinical outcomes studied.

Community health centers (CHCs) are responsible for providing care for more than fifteen million Americans, many of whom are members of groups who have been documented to receive low-quality care. This study examines the quality of care for patients with chronic disease in a nationally representative sample of federally funded CHCs. Fewer than half of eligible patients received appropriate care for the majority of indicators measured, and uninsured patients received poorer care than insured patients. Although the quality of chronic disease care in CHCs compares favorably with that of care received in other settings, gaps in quality were observed for the uninsured.

Although improved control of hypertension is known to attenuate progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), little is known about the adequacy of hypertension treatment in adults with CKD in the United States. Using data from the Fourth National Health and Nutrition Survey, we assessed adherence to national hypertension guideline targets for patients with CKD (blood pressure 2 or presence of albuminuria (albumin:creatinine ratio >30 μg/mg). Multivariable logistic regression with appropriate weights was used to determine predictors of inadequate hypertension control and related outcomes. Among 3213 participants with CKD, 37% had blood pressure 130 mm Hg, with diastolic ≤80 mm Hg, whereas only 7% (95% CI, 3.9 to 9.8%) had a diastolic pressure >80 mm Hg, with systolic blood pressure ≤130 mm Hg. Non-Hispanic black race (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5 to 3.9), age >75 years (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.7 to 8.2), and albuminuria (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.1) were independently associated with inadequate blood pressure control. We conclude that control of hypertension is poor in participants with CKD and that lack of control is primarily attributable to systolic hypertension. Future guidelines and antihypertensive therapies for patients with CKD should target isolated systolic hypertension.

The relationship between blood pressure control and racial differences in the processes of hypertension care have not been well examined. We reviewed medical records of 15 768 visits to 12 general internal medicine clinics during July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002 to determine whether visits were adherent to the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) by identifying medications selected for hypertension therapy. We compared JNC adherence, blood pressure control, and intensification of therapy by patient characteristics. Using repeated measures logistic regression, we determined the adjusted odds of obtaining blood pressure control when therapy was intensified the visit before, and tested the interaction of intensification of therapy and patient race/ethnicity in predicting blood pressure control. JNC adherence was more frequent among blacks (83.7%) and Hispanics (83%) than whites (78.4%) ( P P P =0.02). After adjustment for baseline blood pressure, intensifying therapy was associated with higher odds of subsequent blood pressure control (odds ratio, 1.55; P

BACKGROUND Few studies have examined the impact of inpatient interpreter use for limited English proficient (LEP) patients on length of stay (LOS), 30-day post discharge emergency department (ED) visits and 30-day hospital readmission rates for LEP patients.

OBJECTIVE:: The higher risk of death among recently released inmates relative to the general population may be because of the higher prevalence of substance dependence among inmates or an independent effect of incarceration. We explored the effects of recent incarceration on health outcomes that may be intermediate markers for mortality. METHODS:: Longitudinal multivariable regression analyses were conducted on interview data (baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up) from alcohol- and/or drug-dependent individuals (n = 553) participating in a randomized clinical trial to test the effectiveness of chronic disease management for substance dependence in primary care. The main independent variable was recent incarceration (spending ≥1 night in jail or prison in the past 3 months). The 3 main outcomes of this study were any traumatic injury, substance use-related health consequences, and health care utilization-defined as hospitalization (excluding addiction treatment or detoxification) and/or emergency department visit. RESULTS:: Recent incarceration was not significantly associated with traumatic injury (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.49) or health care utilization (AOR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.64-1.20). However, recent incarceration was associated with higher odds for substance use-related health consequences (AOR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.02-1.98). CONCLUSIONS:: Among people with alcohol and/or drug dependence, recent incarceration was significantly associated with substance use-related health consequences but not injury or health care utilization after adjustment for covariates. These findings suggest that substance use-related health consequences may be part of the explanation for the increased risk of death faced by former inmates. Language: en

OBJECTIVE Access to rheumatology care can expedite diagnosis and treatment of rheumatic diseases and reduce disparities. We surveyed community health center (CHC) medical directors to evaluate rheumatology care in underserved areas and potential strategies for improvement. METHODS We identified 77 Massachusetts CHCs that provide adult medical services and sent a 40-item survey to their physician medical directors. Survey questions assessed the centers' prevalence of rheumatic diseases, prescribing practices of immunosuppressive medications, and possible interventions to improve care. We compared CHC characteristics and rheumatology-specific items and then stratified our data by the response to whether improved access to rheumatology care was needed. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS Thirty-six CHC physician medical directors returned surveys (47% response rate). Fifty-five percent indicated a need for better access to rheumatology care. Eighty-six percent of CHC physicians would not start a patient with rheumatoid arthritis on a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; 94% would not start a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus on an immunosuppressant. When we compared CHCs that reported needing better access to rheumatology care to those that did not, the former described a significantly greater percentage of patients with private insurance or Medicaid who required outside rheumatology referrals (P < 0.05). Language differences and insurance status were highlighted as barriers to obtaining rheumatology care. Sixteen directors (57%) ranked the patient navigator-a layperson to assist with care coordination-as their first-choice intervention. CONCLUSIONS Community health center medical directors expressed a need for better access to rheumatology services. A patient navigator for rheumatic diseases was proposed to help improve care and reduce health disparities.

Background Hispanics are the fasting growing population in the U.S. and disproportionately suffer from chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. Little is known about the complex interplay between acculturation and chronic disease prevalence in the growing and increasingly diverse Hispanic population. We explored the association between diabetes and hypertension prevalence among distinct U.S. Hispanic subgroups by country of origin and by degree of acculturation. Methods We examined the adult participants in the 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS). Using weighted logistic regression stratified by nativity, we measured the association between country of origin and self-reported hypertension and diabetes adjusting for participants’ demographics, insurance status, socio-economic status and degree of acculturation measured by citizenship, English language proficiency and the number of years of residence in the U.S. Results There were 33,633 self-identified Hispanics (foreign-born: 19,988; U.S.-born: 13,645). After multivariable adjustment, we found significant heterogeneity in self-reported hypertension and diabetes prevalence among Hispanic subgroups. Increasing years of U.S. residence was associated with increased disease prevalence. Among all foreign-born subgroups, only Mexicans reported lower odds of hypertension after adjustment for socioeconomic and acculturation factors. Both U.S.-born and foreign-born Mexicans had higher rates of diabetes as compared to non-Hispanic whites. Conclusions We found significant heterogeneity among Hispanics in self-reported rates of hypertension and diabetes by acculturation and country of origin. Our findings highlight the importance of disaggregation of Hispanics by country of origin and acculturation factors whenever possible.

To examine the effectiveness of current community-based participatory research (CBPR) clinical trials involving racial and ethnic minorities.All published peer-reviewed CBPR intervention articles in PubMed and CINAHL databases from January 2003 to May 2010.We performed a systematic literature review.Data were extracted on each study's characteristics, community involvement in research, subject recruitment and retention, and intervention effects.We found 19 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 were published from 2007 to 2010. Articles described some measures of community participation in research with great variability. Although CBPR trials examined a wide range of behavioral and clinical outcomes, such trials had very high success rates in recruiting and retaining minority participants and achieving significant intervention effects.Significant publication gaps remain between CBPR and other interventional research methods. CBPR may be effective in increasing participation of racial and ethnic minority subjects in research and may be a powerful tool in testing the generalizability of effective interventions among these populations. CBPR holds promise as an approach that may contribute greatly to the study of health care delivery to disadvantaged populations.

Background Significant health disparities exist between limited English proficient and English-proficient patients. Little is known about the impact of language services on chronic disease outcomes such as for diabetes. Methods/Principal Findings To determine whether the amount and type of language services received during primary care visits had an impact on diabetes-related outcomes (hospitalization, emergency room utilization, glycemic control) in limited English proficient patients, a retrospective cohort design was utilized. Hospital and medical record data was examined for 1425 limited English proficient patients in the Cambridge Health Alliance diabetes registry. We categorized patients receiving usual care into 7 groups based on the amount and combination of language services (language concordant providers, formal interpretation and nothing) received at primary care visits during a 9 month period. Bivariate analyses and multiple logistic regression were used to determine relationships between language service categories and outcomes in the subsequent 6 months. Thirty-one percent of patients (445) had no documentation of interpreter use or seeing a language concordant provider in any visits. Patients who received 100% of their primary care visits with language concordant providers were least likely to have diabetes-related emergency department visits compared to other groups (p

Adding clinical decision support (CDS) to electronic health records (EHRs) is required under meaningful use legislation, but there has been little national data on effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes. We sought to determine whether EHRs with CDS improved blood pressure control in US primary care visits.We used a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey.We examined adult visits to primary care physicians using the 2007 and 2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).We found that patients had a mean age of 52 years, 34% were male, 15% had diabetes, and 70% were white. Rates of blood pressure control were significantly higher in visits where both an EHR and CDS (79%) were used, compared with visits where physicians used neither tool (74%; P = .004). Blood pressure control rates remained higher after adjusting for potential confounders. In unadjusted analyses, mean systolic blood pressure was 2 mm Hg lower in visits with the use of both an EHR and CDS, compared with visits where physicians used neither tool (P = .03), and this difference remained significant after adjustment.The NAMCS shows that physician use of an EHR with CDS is associated with improved blood pressure control. These findings are important because small improvements in blood pressure control are associated with reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Previous studies documented racial and gender disparities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. The authors examined whether racial and gender disparities in ICD placement are due to underutilization or overutilization. Among 1,054 adults hospitalized from 2001 to 2004 with ventricular arrhythmias in a large academic hospital, the study found that 17% of patients had clinical indicators concordant with ICD placement criteria. Among those, Blacks were less likely than Whites to receive an ICD (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.08-0.71). Among the 83% who were discordant with ICD placement criteria, Blacks (adjusted OR = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.18-0.52) and Hispanics (adjusted OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.10-0.57) were less likely than Whites, and women less likely than men, to receive an ICD (adjusted OR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.34-0.67). In this cohort, these differences appear related to overutilization among men and Whites who are discordant with ICD placement criteria in addition to underutilization among Blacks concordant with placement criteria.

To establish guidelines for more effectively incorporating part-time faculty into departments of internal medicine, a task force was convened in early 2007 by the Association of Specialty Professors. The task force used informal surveys, current literature, and consensus building among members of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine to produce a consensus statement and a series of recommendations. The task force agreed that part-time faculty could enrich a department of medicine, enhance workforce flexibility, and provide high-quality research, patient care, and education in a cost-effective manner. The task force provided a series of detailed steps for operationalizing part-time practice; to do so, key issues were addressed, such as fixed costs, malpractice insurance, space, cross-coverage, mentoring, career development, productivity targets, and flexible scheduling. Recommendations included (1) increasing respect for work-family balance, (2) allowing flexible time as well as part-time employment, (3) directly addressing negative perceptions about part-time faculty, (4) developing policies to allow flexibility in academic advancement, (5) considering part-time faculty as candidates for leadership positions, (6) encouraging granting agencies, including the National Institutes of Health and Veterans Administration, to consider part-time faculty as eligible for research career development awards, and (7) supporting future research in "best practices" for incorporating part-time faculty into academic departments of medicine.

Little is known about the link between hospitalists and performance on hospital-level quality indicators.From October 1, 2005, through September 31, 2006, we linked the Hospital Quality Alliance (HQA) data to the American Hospital Association data on the presence of hospitalists. Main outcome measures included composite measurements of hospital-level quality of care for 3 conditions (acute myocardial infarction [AMI], congestive heart failure [CHF], and pneumonia) and 2 dimensions of care (treatment and diagnosis, as well as counseling and prevention). We fitted a series of logistic regression models to examine the relationship between hospitalists and overall quality of care for each condition, controlling for all other hospital characteristics.Of 3619 hospitals reporting HQA data, 1461 (40.4%) had hospitalists. Hospitals with hospitalists tended to be large, private, not-for-profit, teaching institutions located in the southern United States. The mean unadjusted composite scores were higher for hospitals with hospitalists vs those with no hospitalists for all 3 conditions (93% vs 86% for AMI, 82% vs 72% for CHF, and 75% vs 71% for pneumonia) and both dimensions of care (87% vs 77% for treatment and diagnosis and 75% vs 66% for counseling and prevention) (P.001 for all comparisons). After multivariable adjustment, hospitals with hospitalists continued to perform significantly better than those without hospitalists across all composite scores except for CHF.Hospitals with hospitalists were associated with better performance on HQA indicators for AMI, pneumonia, and the domains of overall disease treatment and diagnosis, as well as counseling and prevention.

Lifestyle modification is recommended for all patients with the diagnosis of hypertension.We examined 3,497 adult hypertensive participants (representing 42 million Americans), from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2004. We analyzed the rate, demographic, and clinical factors of participants who reported receiving lifestyle counseling and their adherence.Of the 3,497 participants with hypertension, 84% reported receiving lifestyle modification counseling. After adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, non-Hispanic blacks were more likely to report receiving counseling (odds ratio (OR), 2.5; P0.001) when compared to whites. Men (OR, 1.5; P = 0.02) reported receiving counseling more often than women as well as those with Medicare insurance (OR, 1.5; P = 0.02) compared to the privately insured. Participants who were hypercholesterolemic (OR, 1.7; P0.001), diabetic (OR, 3.5; P0.001), overweight (OR, 1.5; P0.001), or obese (OR 3.0; P0.001) reported receiving lifestyle counseling more often than those without these conditions. Of those receiving counseling, 88% reported adhering to those recommendations. After adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, only non-Hispanic blacks (OR, 2.8; P0.001) and those aged60 (OR, 1.9; P = 0.04) were more likely to report adhering when advised.High cardiovascular risk hypertensive patients had high rates of lifestyle counseling. However, gaps exist in lifestyle counseling for young and low cardiovascular risk hypertensive patients. In addition, differences in rates of adherence exist especially in those with high cardiovascular risk comorbid conditions. Future work is needed to increase adherence to lifestyle counseling for all hypertensive patients.

Completing pre-transplant evaluations may be a greater barrier to renal transplantation for blacks with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than for whites.To determine whether social support networks facilitate completing the pre-transplant evaluation and reduce racial disparities in this aspect of care.We surveyed 742 black and white ESRD patients in four regional networks 9 months after they initiated dialysis in 1996 and 1997. Patients reported instrumental support networks (number of friends or family to help with daily activities), emotional support networks (number of friends or family available for counsel on personal problems) and dialysis center support (support from dialysis center staff and patients). The completion of pre-transplant evaluations, including preoperative risk stratification and testing, was determined by medical record reviews.Complete renal pre-transplant evaluations.Compared to patients with low levels of instrumental support, those with high levels were more likely to have complete evaluations (25% versus 46%, respectively, p.001). In adjusted analyses, high levels of instrumental support were associated with higher rates of complete evaluations among black women (p.05), white women (p.05), and white men (p.05), but not black men. Among black men, but not other groups, private insurance was a significant predictor of complete evaluations.Instrumental support networks may facilitate completing renal pre-transplant evaluations. Clinical interventions that supplement instrumental support should be evaluated to improve access to renal transplantation. Access to supplemental insurance may also promote complete evaluations for black patients.

Background Prior literature has shown that racial/ethnic minorities with hypertension may receive less aggressive treatment for their high blood pressure. However, to date there are few data available regarding the confounders of racial/ethnic disparities in the intensity of hypertension treatment. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 1,205 patients who had a minimum of two hypertension-related outpatient visits to 12 general internal medicine clinics during 7/1/01-6/30/02. Using logistic regression, we determined the odds of having therapy intensified by patient race/ethnicity after adjustment for clinical characteristics. Results Blacks (81.9%) and Whites (80.3%) were more likely than Latinos (71.5%) to have therapy intensified (P = 0.03). After adjustment for racial differences in the number of outpatient visits and presence of diabetes, there were no racial differences in rates of intensification. Conclusion We found that racial/ethnic differences in therapy intensification were largely accounted for by differences in frequency of clinic visits and in the prevalence of diabetes. Given the higher rates of diabetes and hypertension related mortality among Hispanics in the U.S., future interventions to reduce disparities in cardiovascular outcomes should increase physician awareness of the need to intensify drug therapy more agressively in patients without waiting for multiple clinic visits, and should remind providers to treat hypertension more aggressively among diabetic patients.

Background: Relatively little is known about racial differences in health-related quality of life (HRQL) among patients receiving dialysis for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or how such differences may relate to preferences for renal transplantation. Methods: We surveyed 1392 patients, ages 18–54 approximately 10 months after they initiated dialysis in 4 regions of the United States. The HRQL measures analyzed were overall health, emotional health, physical activity, energy level, social activity, and effect of ESRD on daily life. We also examined whether the measures of HRQL were associated with patients' preferences for renal transplantation by race. Results: After adjustment for socioeconomic and clinical characteristics, Black women and men reported better overall health than White women and men, respectively. Black women reported higher energy levels than white women, and black men reported less negative effects of ESRD on daily life compared to white men. Black men with high levels of physical activity were less likely to be certain about preferring a transplant than white men with similar levels of physical activity. Conclusions: Black patients receiving dialysis reported better HRQL than white patients, even after controlling for potential confounders. Racial differences in preferences for renal transplantation among men may be associated with their levels of physical activity.

Purpose Little is known about the influence of processes of hospital care on racial and ethnic differences in experiences with hospital care. Subjects and methods To determine whether patient experiences differed by race and ethnicity and whether these differences were associated with hospital care characteristics, we analyzed survey and hospital administrative data from 2664 adult patients after hospitalization at an urban teaching hospital during 1998–1999. We assessed the association of patient race and ethnicity with reporting problems in multiple dimensions of patient experience, using logistic regression to adjust for sex, age, self-reported health status, insurance status, income, route of hospital admission, and hospital service. We then stratified adjusted analyses by hospital service. Results After adjustment for demographic and hospital characteristics, black (odds ratio (OR): 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–2.6) and Latino (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.3–3.0) patients reported more problems with respect for their preferences compared to whites. Blacks reported more problems with respect for their preferences (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.0–3.0) among patients discharged from surgical services, and Latinos reported more problems with respect for their preferences (OR:3.6; CI: 1.6–8.2) among patients discharged from obstetrical services when compared to whites. Patient experiences did not significantly differ by race among patients discharged from medical services. Conclusions We found significant racial and ethnic differences in patients' experiences with hospital care, particularly in respect for patient preferences. Our findings suggest physicians and hospital staff should strive to understand and address the expectations of black and Latino patients, particularly those who are hospitalized for surgical or obstetrical issues.

To determine whether current region of residence and immigrant status (born in the United States [US] vs abroad), are associated with the prevalence of hypertension (HTN), uncontrolled HTN, and HTN-related target-organ damage, among African Americans.We studied the survey and physical examination data from a nationally representative cohort of 3,369 self-designated Black participants, aged 30-79 years, in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), which took place during 1988-1994. We calculated the age-adjusted prevalence rates of HTN, uncontrolled HTN, and history of HTN-related target-organ damage in US-born northern African Americans, US-born southern African Americans, and foreign-born African Americans.Hypertension (HTN) was more common among southern African-American men and women, compared to northern African-American men and women (42.2% vs 34.1%, P.002 for men; 42.7% vs 37.2%, P=.02 for women). Uncontrolled HTN was also more common among hypertensive southern African-American women compared to hypertensive northern African-American women (79.8% vs 70.4%, P=.05). Among women, hypertensive Black immigrants had lower rates of HTN-related target-organ damage than either hypertensive US-born southern and northern African Americans (3.3% vs 16.3% and 15.8%, respectively, P=.05).In this nationally representative cohort, immigrant status and geographic region of residence were associated with HTN prevalence, rates of blood pressure control, and HTN-related target-organ damage. Further examination of environmental exposures, cultural issues, and access to care, factors that can differ between groups, may yield important information about modifiable risk factors associated with HTN and target organ damage.

Prior literature suggests that practice level characteristics mediate racial/ethnic disparities in clinical outcomes.1 One such practice level characteristic, use of electronic health records (EHRs) with clinical decision support (CDS), has been associated with improved blood pressure (BP) control in a national study.2 However, we do not know whether these effects differ across racial/ethnic groups.3 We sought to determine whether physician use of EHRs with and without CDS is associated with a reduction in racial/ethnic disparities in BP control in a nationally representative sample. Methods We examined data from primary care visits in the 2007-2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), a nationally representative survey of nonhospital-based ambulatory visits administered by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).4 In a recent article, we examined visits to NAMCS physicians who answered questions about EHRs and electronic guideline-based reminders.2 Primary care . . .

Background Current literature suggests that certain sources of information are used in varying degrees among different socioeconomic and demographic groups; therefore, it is important to determine if specific classes of health information sources are more effective than others in promoting health behaviors. Purpose This study aims to determine if interpersonal versus mass media sources of health information are associated with meeting recommendations for health behaviors (nonsmoking, fruit/vegetable intake, and exercise) and cancer screening. Methods Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship of health information sources (mass media sources including print, TV, Internet; and interpersonal sources including friends and family, community organizations, and healthcare providers) with meeting recommendations for healthy behaviors and cancer screening in the 2005 and 2007 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS). Analyses were conducted in 2009. Results In the 2005 HINTS, participants reporting use of print media and community organizations as sources of health information over the past year were mostly likely to meet recommendations for health behaviors. In the 2007 HINTS, utilization of healthcare providers for health information was associated with meeting recommendations for health behaviors, particularly cancer screening. Conclusions Use of print media and interpersonal sources of health information are most consistently associated with self-reported health behaviors. Additional research should explore the relationship of health information sources to clinical outcomes. Social network interventions to promote adoption of health behaviors should be further developed.

Background The Health Resources and Services Administration Health Disparities Collaboratives (HDCs) were developed to improve care for chronic medical conditions in community health centers (CHCs). Methods We examined whether HDCs reduced disparities in quality by race/ethnicity or insurance status in CHCs nationally. We performed a controlled preintervention/postintervention study of 44 CHCs participating in HDCs for asthma, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension and 20 “external” control CHCs that had not participated. Each intervention center also served as an “internal” control for another condition. For each condition, we created an overall quality score, defined disparities in care as the differences in care between racial/ethnic groups and insurance groups, and examined changes in disparity through a series of hierarchical models using a 3-way interaction term among period, patient characteristics of interest, and treatment group. Results Overall, HDCs had little effect on disparities in composite measures for asthma, diabetes, and hypertension. For asthma care, collaborative centers had a baseline Hispanic-white disparity of 6.5%, which changed to a higher quality of recommended care for Hispanic patients over white patients by 0.8%, resulting in a significantly reduced Hispanic-white disparity compared with the change in disparity seen in external controls (P = .04). There were no other improvements in racial/ethnic or insurance disparities for any other conditions. Conclusions Although HDCs are known to improve quality of care in CHCs, they had minimal effect on racial/ethnic and insurance disparities. In addition to targeting improvement in overall quality, future initiatives should include activities aimed at disparity reduction as an outcome.

Background As of October 1, 2012, hospitals in the United States with excess readmissions based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) risk-adjusted ratio began being penalized. Given the impact of high readmission rates to hospitals nationally, it is important for individual hospitals to identify which patients may be at highest risk of readmission. The objective of this study was to assess the association of institution specific factors with 30-day readmission. Methods The study is a retrospective observational study using administrative data from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010 conducted at a 257 bed community hospital in Massachusetts. The patients included inpatient medical discharges from the hospitalist service with the primary diagnoses of congestive heart failure, pneumonia or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The outcome was 30-day readmission rates. After adjusting for known factors that impact readmission, provider associated factors (i.e. hours worked and census on the day of discharge) and hospital associated factors (i.e. floor of discharge, season) were compared. Results Over the study time period, there were 3774 discharges by hospitalists, with 637 30-day readmissions (17% readmission rate). By condition, readmission rates were 19.6% (448/2284) for congestive heart failure, 13.0% (141/1083) for pneumonia, and 14.7% (200/1358) for chronic obstructive lung disease. After adjusting for known risk factors (gender, age, length of stay, Elixhauser sum score, admission in the previous year, insurance, disposition, primary diagnosis), we found that patients discharged in the winter remained significantly more likely to be readmitted compared to the summer (OR 1.54, p = 0.0008). Patients discharged from the cardiac floor had a trend toward decreased readmission compared a medical/oncology floor (OR 0.85, p = 0.08). Hospitalist work flow factors (census and hours on the day of discharge) were not associated with readmission. Conclusions We found that 30 day hospital readmissions may be associated with institution specific risk factors, even after adjustment for patient factors. These institution specific risk factors may be targets for interventions to prevent readmissions.