Search

Supporting children of affected parents by cancer is challenging whether for patients, families and healthcare teams. Several care methods have been developed to support these children (e.g. individual psychological support, support group). However, professionals may feel uncomfortable with their own theoretical and practical limits. Thus, pair working physician/psychologist can make sense in order to melt the different expertise and to provide advices, open discussion and remediation in the family behaviors and feelings. The aim is to help parents communicate with their children about the disease in order to respond appropriately to the child's needs and questions. Our study is observational, around five clinical situations. We deal with parental psychological function, family communication, marital function, and parent-child relationship… Most of the time, children of cancer patients live a stressful experience with major psycho-emotional impact. Inappropriate coping mechanism can be subjected to misperception and lack of interaction with their parents. The question often expressed is the balance between telling the truth and protecting children. However, studies have reported positive effects of interventions around children needs. Thus, the doctor-psychologist pair allows for adaptability of responses to family functioning, children and parents, and thus ensures holistic support for the patient with cancer., (Copyright © 2024 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Elderly cancer patients often experience cognitive difficulties that can affect their quality of life and autonomy. However, they are rarely included in clinical trials, and only one study has explored the feasibility of cognitive training in this population. While digital cognitive training has been successful in improving cognition in younger patients, its feasibility in elderly patients requires evaluation., Objectives: This feasibility study primarily focused on evaluating patients' ability to use digital cognitive stimulation (usability). Secondary objectives were to evaluate acceptability, adherence, and satisfaction with regard to digital cognitive stimulation in elderly breast cancer patients., Methods: Elderly breast cancer patients at least 70 years old who were receiving cancer treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy) were recruited. Cognitive complaints were evaluated at baseline using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function scale (FACT-Cog). Participants were invited to attend three 20-minute sessions of digital cognitive stimulation using HappyNeuron PRESCO software App on tablets, with the first session being supervised by a neuropsychologist and the two others being performed independently either at home or at the cancer center. We hypothesized that participants would spend 10 of the 20 min of the given time with the tablet completing exercises (training time). Thus, the usability of digital cognitive stimulation was defined as completing at least three exercises during the training time (10 min) of one of the two training sessions in autonomy. The proportion of patients who agreed to participate (acceptability) and completion of planned sessions (adherence) were also estimated. Satisfaction was evaluated post-intervention through a self-report questionnaire., Results: 240 patients were initially screened, 60% (n = 145) were eligible and 38% agreed to participate in the study. Included patients (n = 55) had a mean age of 73 ± 3 years, 96% an ECOG score of 0-1 and were undergoing radiotherapy (64%), and/or chemotherapy (47%) and/or targeted therapy (36%) for stage I-II breast cancer (79%). Most patients reported significant cognitive complaints (82%) and 55% had previous experience with digital tools (n = 30). The usability rate was 92%, with 46 out of 50 evaluable participants completing at least three exercises during the training time. The adherence rate was 88%, with 43/50 participants completing all planned sessions. Participants were largely satisfied with the cognitive intervention format (87%). They preferred to complete sessions at the cancer center under the supervision of the neuropsychologist than alone at home (90%)., Conclusions: The high level of usability, adherence and satisfaction in this study shows for the first time the feasibility of digital cognitive stimulation in cancer patients older than 70 years. However, the intervention should be proposed only to patients reporting cognitive complaints and should be structured and supervised to improve acceptability and adherence., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials identifier: NCT04261153, registered on 07/02/2020., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Using the large nationwide French, national, multicenter, prospective cancer and toxicities (CANTO) cohort, we assessed cognitive functioning change after cancer treatments in a subgroup of breast cancer (BC) patients., Methods: We included patients with newly diagnosed invasive stage I-III BC enrolled in the CANTO substudy focused on cognitive evaluation and healthy control women matched for age and education. Episodic and working memory, executive functions, processing speed, attention, self-report cognitive difficulties (SRCD), fatigue, anxiety and depression were assessed with neuropsychological tests and self-report questionnaires before treatment (baseline) and approximately 1 (year 1) and 2 years (year 2) after diagnosis. We used linear mixed models to study changes in cognition and tested the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy., Results: We studied 276 localized BC patients (62% chemotherapy) compared with 135 healthy controls (HC). After adjustment, patients had lower baseline working memory, processing speed, and attention scores than HC (P ≤ .001), and the difference remained statistically significant over follow-up for working memory and processing speed. Executive function scores were similar between groups at baseline but decreased at year 1 among patients compared with HC (Pchange = .006). This decrease in chemotherapy patients was statistically significant compared with HC scores (Pchange < .001). After adjustment, SRCD were similar between BC patients and HC at baseline but increased in patients after treatment at year 1 (Pchange = .002)., Conclusions: Cognitive difficulties are an important concern in BC patients, starting at diagnosis. Cancer treatments induce executive function decline and SRCD, which decrease over follow-up., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Treatment and outcomes of patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have dramatically improved over the past 20 years. This work evaluated treatment patterns and outcomes according to age., Methods: Women who initiated a treatment for HER2+ MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French comprehensive centers part of the ESME program were included. Objectives were the description of first-line treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), first-line progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors among patients aged 70 years or more (70+), or less than 70 (<70)., Results: Of 4045 women diagnosed with an HER2+ MBC, 814 (20%) were 70+. Standard first-line treatment (chemotherapy combined with an anti-HER2 therapy) was prescribed in 65% of 70+ versus 89% of <70 patients (p < 0.01). Median OS was 49.2 (95% CI, 47.1-52.4), 35.3 (95% CI, 31.5-37.0) and 54.2 months (95% CI, 50.8-55.7) in the whole population, in patients 70+ and <70, respectively. Corresponding median PFS1 were 12.8 (95% CI, 12.3-13.3), 11.1 (95% CI, 10.0-12.3) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 12.7-13.9), respectively. In 70+ women, initiation of non-standard first-line treatment had an independent detrimental time-varying effect on both OS and PFS (HR on OS at 1 year: chemotherapy without anti-HER2 2.79 [95% CI: 2.05-3.79]; endocrine therapy and/or anti-HER2 1.96 [95% CI: 1.43-2.69])., Conclusions: In this large retrospective real-life database, older women with HER2+ MBC received standard first-line treatment less frequently than younger ones. This was independently associated with a worse outcome, but confounding factors and usual selection biases cannot be ruled out., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Cognitive complaints are more frequent in women with breast cancer (BC) than in healthy controls and can be present before any treatment. Findings regarding contributive factors remain inconsistent. This study aimed to identify different groups of patients with cognitive complaints at BC diagnosis and to determine whether these different groups were associated with demographic, medical, or psychological characteristics., Methods: Cognitive complaints were assessed in a subset of 264 women from the French multicenter prospective CANTO cohort, at baseline before any treatment. Clustering analyzes were performed using the six-cognitive dimension Costa's scoring of the FACT-Cog V3. Univariable analyses were used to study how cognitive function (standardized neuropsychological tests, ICCTF), anxiety, depression, fatigue, and quality of life (HADS, FA12, QLQ-C30) were associated with specific cognitive complaints groups., Results: Results included 263 women (54±11 years), newly diagnosed with BC (69% stages I-III). Four distinct groups emerged, ranged from "no complaints" (22.8%), "low complaints" (55.1), "mixed complaints" (14.5%), to "consistent complaints" (7.6%). No significant differences were found in terms of demographic and medical factors between the four groups. However, the groups with higher proportions of patients with complaints were found to have more impairment in executive function, higher scores of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and fatigue, and lower quality of life, than the groups with lower proportions of cognitive complaints., Conclusion: Using complete cognitive assessment prior to BC treatment, we identified four distinct cognitive complaints groups with specific characteristics. This work provides valuable clinical basis to further investigations for a better understanding of cognitive complaints and their associates., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Twenty to 30% of patients with breast cancer have cognitive impairment after surgery and before adjuvant treatment, but very few studies have focused on cognition before any treatment. This study used a subgroup of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer from the French cancer and toxicities (CANTO) cohort to describe cognition before any treatment in comparison with a group of healthy controls (HC)., Methods: Cognitive assessment was performed before any breast cancer treatment (surgery or neoadjuvant treatment) on women with newly diagnosed invasive stage I-III breast cancer and HCs. Objective cognitive performance, cognitive complaints, anxiety, depression, and fatigue were assessed. Objective cognitive impairment was defined according to International Cognition and Cancer Task Force recommendations., Results: Of the 264 included patients with breast cancer (54 ± 11 years) and 132 age-matched HCs (53 ± 9 years), overall objective cognitive impairment was observed in 28% of patients with breast cancer and 8% of HCs ( P < 0.001). Cognitive complaints were reported by 24% of patients versus 12% of HCs ( P < 0.01). Patients reported significantly more anxiety and emotional and cognitive fatigue than HCs ( P < 0.01). After adjustment, significantly more patients with breast cancer had overall objective cognitive impairment than HCs [OR = 3.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-6.88] without significant difference between groups for cognitive complaints (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.65-2.92). Cognitive complaints were positively associated with fatigue (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05)., Conclusions: In this prospective study, compared with HCs, patients with localized breast cancer had more objective cognitive impairment before any treatment. Cognitive complaints were mostly related to fatigue., Impact: Baseline assessment before treatment is important to assess the impact of each cancer treatment on cognition., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

A number of neurotoxicity associated with oncological treatments has been reported in non-central nervous system cancers. An expert group presents the state of the art and a guide to help the choice of appropriated tools to assess patient cognition in studies on oncology and neurobehavior in animal models. In addition, current cognitive rehabilitation programs currently under evaluation are also discussed. Cognitive assessments in oncology depend on the research question, study design, cognitive domains, patients' characteristics, psychometric properties of the tests, and whether the tests are supervised or not by a neuropsychologist. Batteries of electronic tests can be proposed, but several of them are characterized by weak psychometric developments. In order to improve the comprehension on the impact of cancer treatments on cognition, new animal models are in development, and would in the future include non-human primate models. By bringing together the skills and practices of oncologists, neurologists, neuropsychologists, neuroscientists, we propose a series of specific tools and tests that accompany the cognitive management of non-CNS cancer patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Cognitive deficits (CD) are reported among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, but may also be observed before treatment. Though elderly patients are expected to be more prone to present age-related CD, poor information is available regarding the impact of cancer and chemotherapy on this population. This study assessed baseline cognitive functions (before adjuvant treatment) in elderly early stage breast cancer (EBC) patients., Methods: Women >65years-old with newly diagnosed EBC were included in this prospective study. Episodic memory, working memory, executive functions and information processing speed were assessed by neuropsychological tests. Questionnaires were used to assess subjective CD, anxiety, depression, fatigue, quality of life and geriatric profile. Objective CD were defined using International Cognition and Cancer Task Force criteria. A group of elderly women without cancer coupled with published data related to healthy women were used for comparison (respectively to subjective and objective CD)., Results: Among the 123 elderly EBC patients (70±4years) included, 41% presented objective CD, which is greater than expected in healthy population norms (binomial test P<.0001). Verbal episodic memory was mainly impaired (21% of patients). No correlation was observed between objective CD and cancer stage or geriatric assessment. Subjective CD only correlated with verbal episodic memory (P=.01)., Conclusions: This is the first large series assessing baseline cognitive functions in elderly EBC patients. More than 40% presented objective CD before any adjuvant therapy, which is higher than what is reported among younger patients. Our results reinforce the hypothesis that age is a risk factor for CD in EBC patients., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cancer and chemotherapy can have adverse effects on cognitive functions and quality of life of patients. We wanted to know the patients' view on these disorders, but also their expectations in terms of assessment and support., Methods and Results: A survey was conducted in day care hospital among 551 patients from three cancer centers. Most of the patients were between 40 and 74 years and suffered from breast cancer. Eighty-four percent were treated with chemotherapy. Forty-one percent of patients report memory problems, 26% were affected by specific concentration disorders, and 19% of the attention. On the whole, 52% of patients report at least one of the previous cognitive impairment. Among these patients, 80% evoked that the support of these problems was essential and 70% were willing to participate in "workshops" to deal with these disorders., Conclusion: The cognitive impairment occurrence is a real problem for patients receiving chemotherapy and becomes a priority in the global management of their disease. Studies assessing a specific support of theses symptoms should be encouraged to help patients.