Search

Background.This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term smoking cessation efficacy of varying doses of transdermal nicotine delivery systems 4 to 5 years post-quit day. Methods.A follow-up study was conducted 48 to 62 months after quit day among patients who were enrolled in the Transdermal Nicotine Study Group investigation. The latter study included group smoking cessation counseling and randomized assignment to 21, 14, or 7 mg nicotine patches or placebo patches. Seven of nine smoking cessation research centers participated in the long term follow-up investigation. Results.The self-reported continuous quit rate among patients originally assigned 21 mg (20.2%) was significantly higher than rates for patients assigned 14 mg (10.4%), 7 mg (11.8%), or placebo patches (7.4%). Log rank survival analysis found no difference in relapse rates after 1 year postcessation. Smokers under age 30 years were significantly less likely to be abstinent at long term follow-up compared to smokers ≥30 years of age (3 vs 13%, respectively). Mean weight gain in confirmed continuous quitters was 10.1 kg in men and 8.0 kg in women. Of the 63 continuous abstainers surveyed, 30 respondents (48%) reported that they no longer craved cigarettes, and no individual reported daily craving for cigarettes. Conclusions.Nicotine patch therapy with 21 mg/day patches resulted in a significantly higher long-term continuous abstinence rate compared to lower dose patches and placebo. Relapse rates among the various treatment conditions were similar after 1 year postcessation.

A multidisciplinary team assessed five patients who alleged chronic medically unexplained multiorgan system symptoms described by idiopathic environmental intolerance allegedly triggered by exposure to solvents used in membrane roofing repair work on an office building. The event precipitated an incident of mass psychogenic illness (MPI). Treating physicians diagnosed irritant-associated vocal cord dysfunction (IVCD) and reactive airways disease syndrome (RADS) resulting from exposure. The authors conducted medical, psychological, and industrial hygiene evaluations. Air monitoring data for total volatile organic compounds obtained during the 2-day exposure period, measurements of emissions during membrane roofing repair at a similar site, mathematical modeling of air contaminant concentrations, and injection of tracer gas into the incident building revealed exposure levels well below those doses anticipated to cause clinical symptoms. There was no objective medical evidence validating symptoms. Review of the medical records indicated that the video laryngoscopy data, pulmonary function tests, and medical examinations relied upon by the treating physicians were inconsistent with published criteria for IVCD and RADS. Psychological evaluation identified defensiveness and self-serving misrepresentations of exaggerated health concerns associated with somatization and malingering. Each case had personality traits associated with at least one personality disorder. Social histories identified premorbid life events and stressors associated with distress. This is the first study to assess psychological predisposition, social interaction among the plaintiffs, and iatrogenic reinforcement of beliefs by diagnoses of pseudo-disorders associated with patient misrepresentation of exaggerated health concerns in an incident of MPI.

In a double-blind trial, 29 patients were treated for stable, chronic bronchitis with iodinated glycerol (Organidin®, 60 mg four times daily; n = 16) or placebo (n = 13). The study consisted of a 2-week single-blind lead-in period, followed by a 6-week double-blind treatment period, and assessed a total of 50 response variables. In this set of patients, treatment with iodinated glycerol was associated with statistically significant (P < 0.05) and/or positive trend (P < 0.1) toward improvement in cough frequency, cough severity, difficulty in raising sputum, sputum thickness, sputum stickiness, forced expiratory flow at FVC25%–75%, cell concentration in sputum, and several measures of physician assessment of patient condition. Iodinated glycerol was well tolerated during the 6-week treatment period; no adverse effects were reported and no patient receiving iodinated glycerol withdrew from the study prematurely. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that iodinated glycerol, 60-mg tablets given in a total daily dose of 240 mg, is safe and effective therapy for reducing symptoms in patients with stable, chronic bronchitis.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sublingual lobeline sulfate for smoking cessation. Methods A multicenter (3 sites), double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled, phase 3 smoking cessation trial of sublingual formulation of lobeline sulfate. A total of 750 smokers (250 per site) were randomized to either treatment (lobeline sulfate) or placebo with individual smoking cessation counseling lasting up to approximately 10 minutes. Results Efficacy revealed no statistical significance (P = 0.62) for lobeline sulfate as a smoking cessation aid. Conclusion Sublingual formulation of lobeline sulfate does not appear to be an effective smoking cessation aid.

A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and duration of the bronchodilation resulting from the addition of 500 micrograms of ipratropium bromide (Atrovent; Boehringer Ingelheim, CT) inhalation solution to standard small volume nebulizer treatments with 2.5 mg albuterol inhalation solution. A total of 195 patients (63% men, average age 64 years) with10 pack-year smoking histories and stable, moderate-to- severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 1.02 liter, 38.8% predicted) from eight university-affiliated chest clinics in seven U.S. cities were enrolled into the study. Asthma, rhinitis, and eosinophilia were exclusions, as was daily use of10 mg of prednisone (or 20 mg on alternate days). There was a 2-week stabilization period during which the patients were instructed in the use of the small volume nebulizers, which they used three times daily with albuterol alone. They were asked to keep daily logs of peak flow rates, pulmonary symptoms, and additional medication usage. On their test day 1 the subjects came to the pulmonary function laboratory having been off theophylline for 24 hours and beta 2-agonists for 12 hours and performed a baseline spirometry. They then received their morning small volume nebulizer treatment of albuterol to which was added either 500 micrograms if ipratropium bromide or a saline placebo. Spirometry was repeated at 15, 30, and 60 minutes, and then hourly for 8 hours. Subjects then took home a 2-week supply of albuterol and test drug for thrice daily use in their small volume nebulizer. They were evaluated for pulmonary symptoms and adverse effects every 14 days. The 8-hour spirometry was repeated on test day 43 and finally on test day 85. Primary data evaluated were the peak increase in FEV1 and the area between the FEV1 baseline value and the 8-hour FEV1 curve. Similar calculations were made for forced vital capacity (FVC) and 25-75% forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%). On test day 1 the peak increase in FEV1 for the ipratropium bromide + albuterol subjects was 26% greater than those on placebo + albuterol (p0.003). The area under the 8-hour FEV1 curve was 64% greater in those given ipratropium bromide on test day 1 (p0.0002). Similar increases were seen in FVC and FEF25-75%. The peak improvements in FEV1 and FVC with the addition of ipratropium bromide to albuterol were maintained on test days 43 and 85. Considering the safety and efficacy profiles of this combination, the data would suggest that ipratropium bromide inhalation solution should be considered first-line therapy for those patients with COPD requiring small volume nebulizer treatments.

Objective. —To evaluate the efficacy of a new transdermal nicotine system for smoking cessation. Design. —Two 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trials were conducted. Successful abstainers from both trials enrolled in a third trial for blinded downtitration from medications (6 weeks) and subsequent off-drug follow-up (12 weeks). Setting. —Nine outpatient clinics specializing in the treatment of smoking cessation. Patients. —Healthy volunteers who smoked one or more packs of cigarettes daily and wanted to participate in a smoking cessation program. Intervention. —Patients were randomly assigned to a transdermal nicotine system delivering nicotine at rates of 21,14, or 7 mg (in trial 1 only) over 24 hours or to placebo. Group counseling sessions were provided to all participants. Main Outcome Measure. —Rates of continuous smoking abstinence were determined during 6 weeks of full-dose treatment, a 6-week weaning period (through week 12), and a 3-month follow-up receiving no therapy (through week 24). Abstinence was defined by patient diary reports of no smoking during the designated periods, confirmed by expired-breath carbon monoxide levels of 8 ppm or lower. Results. —The centers enrolled 935 patients. Cessation rates during the last 4 weeks of the two 6-week trials (pooled data) were 61%, 48%, and 27% for 21-and 14-mg transdermal nicotine and placebo, respectively ( P ≤.001 for each active treatment vs placebo). Six-month abstinence rates for 21-mg transdermal nicotine and placebo were 26% and 12%, respectively ( P ≤.001). All transdermal nicotine doses significantly decreased the severity of nicotine withdrawal symptoms and significantly reduced cigarette use by patients who did not stop smoking. Compliance was excellent, and no serious systemic adverse effects were reported. Conclusions. —Transdermal nicotine systems show considerable promise as an aid to smoking cessation. ( JAMA . 1991;266:3133-3138)

Twenty-eight patients with advanced emphysema and/or chronic bronchitis and severe airflow obstruction were randomly assigned to receive either bitolterol or isoproterenol aerosol delivered by a metered dose device which was administered three times daily. Randomization resulted in similar patients with like degrees of airflow obstruction and responsiveness to a test dose of inhaled bronchodilator. Significantly greater improvement in airflow was achieved by administration of bitolterol compared to isoproterenol. Pharmacologic responses continued after 90 days of daily dosing. Both drugs were well tolerated and side effects included mild degrees of tachycardia for both drugs. Two patients assigned to isoproterenol stopped therapy during the study due to side effects. This study indicates that bitolterol is more effective than isoproterenol in degree and duration of bronchodilatation in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Bitolterol mesylate, 1.0 mg, or isoproterenol hydrochloride, 1.5 mg, was administered three times daily for 3 months in a double-blind, multicenter study via closed-port, intermittent-flow, compressor-driven nebulizer system (CPIF) to 182 nonsteroid-using patients with asthma. Mean baseline FEV1 was approximately 60% of predicted normal for both groups. Pulmonary function tests and vital signs were measured before and for up to 8 hours after treatments on test days 1, 30, 60, and 90. Mean maximum increases in FEV1 were 51%, 54%, 52%, and 55% for bitolterol versus 48%, 46%, 50%, and 43% for isoproterenol on these monthly test days. The mean FEV1 response remained greater than 15% over zero time (baseline) for greater than or equal to 8 hours after medication with bitolterol on each of four monthly pulmonary function test days and 2 1/2 to 5 hours for isoproterenol. Median durations of bronchodilator activity for bitolterol were 7.3, 6.5, 6.5, and 6.0 hours versus 4.0, 1.7, 3.7, and 1.9 hours for isoproterenol on the monthly test days. On these test days, 37% to 49% of the patients treated with bitolterol had a duration of action of at least 8 hours compared with 16% to 29% after isoproterenol treatment. The onset of activity was within 5 minutes for both drugs. Bitolterol provided superior bronchodilator activity with fewer adverse effects compared with isoproterenol, and there was no evidence for drug tolerance during this 3-month study.

This study of 183 ambulatory patients with steroid-dependent asthma was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nebulized bitolterol mesylate solution (0.2%) compared to isoproterenol hydrochloride solution (0.3%). A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, repetitive-dose design was followed at nine centers for 3 months. Patients received either 1.0 mg of bitolterol or 1.5 mg of isoproterenol three times a day with a closed, intermittent-flow nebulization system. Pulmonary function was evaluated on four 8-hour office visits at approximately 30-day intervals. Efficacy was based on a 15% increase in FEV1 over baseline. Both medications resulted in bronchodilatation within 5 minutes, whereas nebulized bitolterol was statistically superior (p less than 0.05) to nebulized isoproterenol in terms of duration of action and area under the curve. The mean FEV1 response to bitolterol therapy remained greater than 15% over baseline for 5 to 8 hours on the four test days compared to 2 to 4.75 hours for isoproterenol therapy. Both medications were well tolerated. Adverse reactions were transient, and most were mild to moderate. Tremor was the most frequent side effect occurring in approximately 30% of the patients in both groups. There were no clinically significant laboratory changes or electrocardiographic findings. Nebulized bitolterol mesylate was found to be a safe and effective bronchodilator in steroid-dependent patients with asthma.