Search

PURPOSE: To present an analysis of tear film hyperosmolarity in a large, consecutive population and evaluate the correlation of ocular and systemic conditions with tear film osmolarity (TFO). SETTING: Private practice, Sydney, Australia. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, consecutive cohort. METHOD: Patients undergoing screening for laser refractive surgery from October 2017 to October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. 1404 patients (n = 1357 standard, n = 47 postrefractive) undergoing screening for laser refractive surgery from October 2017 to October 2020 were reviewed. Routine examination included TFO and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. TFO was conducted prior to further tests, and patients refrained from topical eyedrops minimum 2 hours before the appointment. RESULTS: 1404 patients (n = 1357 standards, n = 47 postrefractive) patients were reviewed. Mean highest TFO in the standard population was 299.12 ± 11.94 mOsm/L, with 82.3% of eyes <308 mOsm/L indicating normal tear film homeostasis. The mean intereye TFO difference was 8.17 ± 8.60 mOsm/L, with 65.2% of eyes ≤8 mOsm/L. Mean highest TFO in the postrefractive subgroup was 299.72 ± 11.00 mOsm/L, with a mean intereye difference of 9.02 ± 6.92 mOsm/L. Postrefractive surgery patients indicated higher mean OSDI values of 15.28 ± 14.46 compared with the remainder of the population 9.69 ± 10.56 (P = .012). Significant correlation was demonstrated between TFO scores and OSDI normal classification in the standard population only (P = .005, r = 0.077). The use of contact lens correlated inversely with TFO and OSDI scores (P = .000, r = -0.136, and P = .000, r = -0.152, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the largest available cohort of TFO scores in a standard population presenting for refractive surgery. Although most patients were found to fall within normal ranges, a reasonable percentage were diagnosed with tear hyperosmolarity and therefore at risk

PURPOSE: Trifocal Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) were developed to provide patients with effective near, intermediate and distance vision, thus minimizing spectacle dependency. Residual astigmatism has previously been shown to impact unaided visual acuity across all distances; therefore, to optimise the expected outcomes, consideration of preoperative corneal astigmatism is essential. The purpose of this study was to provide a real-world, multi-site review of visual and refractive outcomes in eyes undergoing implantation with the Panoptix Trifocal toric IOL platform. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study represents a two-fold approach. Patients who had previously undergone routine cataract removal and IOL insertion with the Panoptix Toric IOL were retrospectively analysed for routine efficacy and safety endpoints ("Retrospective Cohort"). Data was retrieved from the preoperative, surgical and postoperative visits (range 2-6 weeks). A further subset of patients undergoing lens removal and bilateral Panoptix Toric IOL insertion were identified at surgery ("Qualitative Cohort"). These patients underwent additional testing inclusive of quality of vision questionnaire and bilateral defocus curve. RESULTS: A total of 466 eyes of 254 patients were included in the retrospective cohort. Between 91% and 98% of eyes, respectively, were within 0.50D and 1.00D of target. Mean absolute difference from Spherical Equivalent (SE) target was 0.22 ± 0.24Ds. Following surgery, 94% of eyes demonstrated a refractive astigmatism of 0.50D or less. Further, 61% eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better, increasing to 94% achieving 20/32 or better. Seventy percent of eyes unilaterally achieved N5 unaided and 66.0% achieved N8 or better at intermediate. In the qualitative cohort, no patient described any symptom as significant or requested explant. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, the PanOptix toric trifocal IOL continues to demonstrate refractive accuracy and good

Background: Humans are exposed to tens of thousands of chemical substances that need to be assessed for their potential toxicity. Acute systemic toxicity testing serves as the basis for regulatory hazard classification, labeling, and risk management. However, it is cost- and time-prohibitive to evaluate all new and existing chemicals using traditional rodent acute toxicity tests. In silica models built using existing data facilitate rapid acute tox- icity predictions without using animals. Objkctivks: The U.S. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) Acute Toxicity Workgroup organ- ized an international collaboration to develop in silica models for predicting acute oral toxicity based on five different end points: Lethal Dose 50 (LD50 value, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hazard (four) categories, Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labeling hazard (five) categories, very toxic chemicals [LD50 (LD50 ≤ 50 mg/kg)], and nontoxic chemicals (LD50 > 2,000 mg/kg). Mkthods: An acute oral toxicity data inventory for 11,992 chemicals was compiled, split into training and evaluation sets, and made available to 35 participating international research groups that submitted a total of 139 predictive models. Predictions that fell within the applicability domains of the submitted models were evaluated using external validation sets. These were then combined into consensus models to leverage strengths of individual approaches. Results: The resulting consensus predictions, which leverage the collective strengths of each individual model, form the Collaborative Acute Toxicity Modeling Suite (CATMoS). CATMoS demonstrated high performance in terms of accuracy and robustness when compared with in viva results. Discussion: CATMoS is being evaluated by regulatory agencies for its utility and applicability as a potential replacement for in viva rat acute oral toxicity studies. CATMoS predictions for more than 800,000 chemica

Tissue Biobanks represent an invaluable resource. Despite the majority of people supporting tissue donation, the actual rate remains low overall. Tissue discarded from surgical procedures represents a further avenue for collection for use in research. We aim to understand the information and consent requirements in a cohort of healthy, post-ophthalmic surgical subjects to optimise future tissue collection in living donors. Patients attending an ophthalmic clinic following refractive surgery for myopia (SMILE) were identified. Patient consent was implied with the completion of the provided survey. The questionnaire included gender, age range and education status. The majority of 31 subjects identified a benefit for future patients as the main motive for potential donation of discarded tissue (71%). Payment for the discarded tissue would not influence their decision in 77.4%. Explanation of the potential benefits of research was the most important information to consider before making a decision to donate. Only 12.9% of patients would have refused to include further information. Almost half of patients felt that the Biobank became the owner of tissue following donation. Current surgical patients may be more inclined to participate in research than the general public because of a sense of duty or an increased understanding of the role of research in evolving treatment. Despite minor uncertainty about the eventual use of the tissue and data, most subjects were positive to donation of discarded ocular tissue and de-identified information. Consent and education processes should be revised within an ophthalmic practice to minimise future patient anxiety.

PURPOSE:To review safety and efficacy outcomes following re-treatment for residual refractive errors in eyes with prior laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and determine the most appropriate course of action for patients. METHODS:A review of all patients undergoing LASIK enhancement at a single refractive surgery center between 2012 and 2017 was undertaken. Refraction and biomicroscopy results before and after enhancement were collated and analyzed according to the method of enhancement (flap lift or surface ablation). RESULTS:A total of 108 eyes were included in the analysis; 58 eyes underwent flap lift and 50 underwent surface ablation retreatment with mean times to enhancement of 22.3 and 53.2 months, respectively. The mean spherical equivalent prior to enhancement was -0.43 ± 0.69 and -1.03 ± 1.01 diopters (D) for the flap lift and surface ablation groups, respectively. The absolute difference from intended refraction was statistically significant (lift 0.16 ± 0.24 versus surface ablation 0.31 ± 0.35 D; P = .01). The difference was more pronounced for eyes with prior hyperopia (P = .041). The incidence of haze following re-treatment was 3.4% in the flap lift group versus 10.0% in the surface ablation group, and 8.6% of the flap lift group had evidence of epithelial ingrowth, with 1 eye requiring washout. There was no correlation between time to enhancement, refraction, and incidence of complications following the enhancement procedure. CONCLUSIONS:There has been a trend toward treating residual LASIK refractive error through surface ablation. This review suggests that flap lift may result in a more accurate refractive outcome, albeit with an expected greater risk of epithelial ingrowth. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(1):6-11.].

© 2017 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists Importance: This study represents a novel comparison of recently introduced intraocular lens power calculation formulas. Background: To compare current new generation formulas for calculating the intraocular lens power for a standard cohort of patients undergoing cataract and lens replacement surgery in a private group practice in Australia. Design: Retrospective case series comparison. Participants: Postoperative results from 400 consecutive patients undergoing implantation of an SN60WF intraocular lens post cataract removal by 12 surgeons were used. Methods: Refractive outcomes were compared with expected targets to determine the predicted refractive outcomes using the Hill-radial basis function, Barrett Universal II and readily available third or fourth generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas. Main Outcome Measure: Mean absolute predicted error. Results: The mean absolute predicted difference ranged from 0.30 to 0.34 D. There was no overall significant difference in the predicted difference or variance between formulas. All formulas achieved greater than 78.3% of eyes within ±0.5 D of intended refraction. The Hill-radial basis function and Barrett formulas provided the lowest mean numerical error compared with existing formulas in short and long eyes, respectively. The Barrett Universal II formula had the lowest percentage of refractive surprises (>1 D from predicted error) across all axial lengths. Conclusions and Relevance: Acceptable outcomes can be achieved with optical biometry, consistent surgical technique and use of current intraocular lens power calculation formulas. The Barrett Universal II formula may provide the lowest risk of refractive surprise compared with other intraocular lens power calculation formulas.

© 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. Femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) was introduced in 2009 and has increasingly been incorporated into surgical practice. The automation of three key aspects of cataract surgery was expected to deliver a significant improvement in both refractive and safety outcomes. The published literature has not yet shown consistent refractive improvement above conventional techniques. The purpose of this paper is to review current FLACS refractive outcomes and explore factors that may have contributed to the current findings and whether future improvements are possible.

BACKGROUND: Independence from all optical aids, and freedom from unwanted symptoms, following cataract and lens surgery remains the ultimate goal of both patient and surgeon. The development of trifocal IOL technology provides an ever-increasing range of options. The purpose of our study is to understand the predictability, safety and efficacy of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) following cataract or refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective consecutive case series of patients undergoing cataract extraction or RLE followed by implantation of the Alcon IQ Panoptix IOL. Pre and postoperative refractive and visual parameters were recorded and evaluated. As the cohort followed a normal distribution, standard parametric tests were used. Paired t-test was used to compare the difference between target and postoperative refractive errors. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was also reported. RESULTS: The IOL was implanted in 66 eyes of 33 patients. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.08 ± 0.25 dioptres (D). This was not significantly different from the target refraction (p = 0.841). Sixty-five percent of patients were within ± 0.25 D of the target SE refraction with 100% within ± 0.50 D of intended correction. Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.01 ± 0.10 LogMAR. All patients achieved an unaided distance acuity of 20/40 or better postoperatively. Binocularly, 100% saw 0.20 LogMAR or better at near without correction and 88.9% achieved this level for uncorrected intermediate visual acuity. No intraoperative complications were noted. Five patients complained of moderate haloes in the early postoperative period. CONCLUSION: The AcrySof IQ Panoptix IOL provides functional uncorrected visual acuity at distance, intermediate and near positions. Our results remain equivalent with existing trifocal IOL outcomes and provide surgeons with a further IOL alternati