Search

Introduction: Despite rapid shifts in consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) training in residency, including increasing general residency training requirements from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, greater utilization of advanced practice providers, and effects of the coronavirus-2019 pandemic, the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (ACLP) has not updated recommendations for residency training in CLP since 2014. A national survey of residency program directors in 2021 suggested many changes to the structure of CLP rotations at individual programs over the past decade., Methods: We convened a workgroup of 8 ACLP members holding leadership positions in residency and fellowship education on local and national levels. The project was approved by the ACLP Executive Council and conducted via a three-stage iterative process., Results: Consensus was reached on 34 recommendations across four domains, including structural issues, faculty supervsion, formal curriculum and evaluations, and elective experiences., Discussion: Residents must spend sufficient time on CLP rotations to achieve relevant milestones. Given that consultants are expected to offer unique insight, the ideal placement of core CLP rotations comes at a time in residency where residents are able to provide expert opinion and lead teams. Faculty expertise in CLP and availability to provide direct supervision and oversight to trainees is essential. A separate and formal CLP didactic curriculum should exist, and elective opportunities should be offered to supplement training., Conclusions: These recommendations are intended to guide residency program directors towards optimizing CLP training for all residents, including those who will eventually pursue CLP fellowship. Establishing a strong CLP foundation for all residents is essential for ensuring competency in providing psychiatric care for medically complex patients and collaborating with our colleagues in other specialties, as well as fostering trainee interest in pursuing a career in CLP., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: In 2010, the Academy of Consultation-Liaison (then Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine) surveyed US residency programs to understand training in consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatry, leading to recommendations in 2014. Since then, residency training in CL has evolved in the context of competing training demands, increased prioritization of electives, and reactions to coronavirus 2019., Objective: To determine the current state of residency training in CL across the United States, including the structure of core and elective resident rotations in CL, attending physician staffing, presence of fellows and other trainees, didactic curriculum, and impact of coronavirus 2019., Methods: Members of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Residency Education Subcommittee designed and piloted an 81-question survey tool that was sent to program directors of 269 US general psychiatry training programs for voluntary completion., Results: One hundred three of 269 programs responded to the survey, yielding a response rate of 38.3%. Responding programs were larger and more likely to have a CL fellowship than nonresponding programs. Of the 103 responding programs, 82.5% have more than the minimally required time on CL, with 46.6% reporting an increase in total CL time in the past decade. Since 2010, 18.4% of responding programs changed the placement of the CL rotation, with 43.7% now adherent to the 2014 Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine recommendation to include core CL training in the second half of residency. Thirty-five percent of responding programs require residents to rotate on more than 1 CL service, and 19.4% have a required outpatient CL component. Faculty full-time equivalent varies widely. Of all services included, 33.8% report that all CL faculty are board-certified in CL psychiatry, whereas 18.7% have no board-certified faculty. Of the 103 responding programs, 36.9% offer a CL fellowship, but 31.1% report no residency graduates pursuing CL fellowships in the past 5 years. Of the included programs, 77.7% have a formal CL curriculum for residents, with 34.0% reporting a separate didactic series during the CL rotation., Conclusions: Among the responding programs, the amount of time spent on core CL rotations has increased in the past decade, but programs have also shifted CL training earlier in the course of residency. Residency programs are increasingly challenged to provide an optimal CL experience, and updated guidance from Academy of Consultation-Liaison may be appreciated., (Copyright © 2022 Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. All rights reserved.)

Background: As mental health services in outpatient medical clinics expand, psychiatrists must be trained to practice in these settings., Objectives: The Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry residency education subcommittee convened a writing group with the goal of summarizing the current evidence about outpatient consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) training and providing a framework for CLP educators who are interested in developing outpatient CLP rotations within their programs., Method: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and PsycINFO (via OVID) were reviewed each from inception to December 2019, for psychiatric CLP services in ambulatory settings that involved residents or fellows. The CLP education guidelines were reviewed for recommendations relevant to outpatient CLP. We also searched MedEd portal for published curriculums relevant to CLP. The group held 2 conferences to reach consensus about recommendations in setting up outpatient CLP rotations., Results: Seventeen articles, 3 Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry-supported guidelines, and 8 online didactic resources were identified as directly reporting on the organization and/or impact of an outpatient CLP rotation. These manuscripts indicated that residents found outpatient CLP rotations effective and relevant to their future careers. However, the literature provided few recommendations for establishing formal outpatient CLP training experiences., Conclusions: Outpatient CLP rotations offer multiple benefits for trainees, including exposure to specific clinical scenarios and therapeutic interventions applicable only in the outpatient setting, increased continuity of care, and the unique experience of providing liaison and education to non-mental health providers. The article outlines recommendations and examples for developing outpatient CLP rotations which CLP educators can incorporate in their programs., (Copyright © 2020 Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Collaborative care can treat depression in HIV but existing studies have been limited by excluding patients with acute or severe depression. The purpose of this analysis is to determine if real-world implementation of collaborative care in HIV is associated with improvement in depression, and to identify correlates of depression outcomes., Methods: Collaborative care was implemented as part of a large practice transformation initiative. Change in depression, measured by PHQ-9 score, at baseline compared to 12 months post-enrollment was the outcome, which was operationalized as remission, response, and neither response nor remission. Bivariate and multivariate associations were assessed between several variables at baseline and the outcome., Results: Out of 416, 99 (23.79%) patients remitted and 89 (21.39%) responded (without remission). In the bivariate analysis having a documented psychiatric comorbidity was associated with low remission [31 (16.58%)]; p = 0.008. Having generalized anxiety disorder was associated with low remission [18 (15.00%)] and response rates [26 (21.67%)]; p = 0.022. Having a substance use disorder (alcohol, cocaine, or amphetamine) - was associated with poor remission [29 (16.67%)] and response [33 (18.97%)]; p = 0.004. Social isolation was correlated with lower response and remission rates (p = 0.0022). In the multivariate analysis older age was associated with higher remission rates (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.005-1.194) whereas being a Medicaid beneficiary (OR: 0.652; 95% CI: 1.123-2.797), having comorbid generalized anxiety disorder (OR: 0.267; 95% CI: 0.122-0.584) or a stimulant use disorder (cocaine [OR: 0.413; 95% CI: 0.222-0.926] or amphetamines [OR: 0.185; 95% CI: 0.037-0.766]), was associated with lower remission rates., Conclusion: We found that depression improved in our study subjects. We identified several modifiable correlates of depression outcomes., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Depressive symptoms may differ in severity and change over time in people living with HIV (PLWH). Describing depression trajectories and associated clinical characteristics of PLWH in an interventional study may help in developing a more personalized medicine approach. Using latent class growth analysis four, 15-month self-reported depression trajectories were identified in 416 PLWH participating in a collaborative care program. The four subgroups were characterized by improving (58.4% [of participants]), worsening (9.4%), highly responsive (19.5%) and persistently severe (12.7%) depressive symptoms. A high proportion of individuals were in trajectories marked by improvement. Further, the highly responsive group had on average, over 50% reduction of self-reported depressive symptoms. Self-reported trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, lower neighborhood-level education and fewer HIV and psychiatry clinic visits were associated with worsening or persistently severe depressive symptom trajectories. Members of the persistently severe group were less likely to be virally suppressed after 12-months. Identifying subgroups of PLWH based on changes in self-reported depressive symptoms may further inform intervention approaches that can advance care.

Cultivating a healthy sex life after HIV diagnosis can be difficult for people with HIV (PWH), as stigma and concerns for transmission may act as barriers to sexual activity. Addressing these obstacles is a necessary part of psychotherapy when helping PWH reincorporate sexual activities. However, mental health providers may be unprepared to discuss factors that impact sexual functioning with their HIV-positive clients. Currently, there are no gold-standard evidence-based treatments developed specifically for HIV-positive individuals. Therefore, this article focuses on using cognitive-behavioral techniques to address sexual concerns in PWH. Cognitive-behavioral therapy has been effective at improving sexual health in other medical populations and can be adapted to optimize sexual functioning in PWH. In this article, we discuss cases of common concerns PWH experience and how cognitive-behavioral therapy techniques (e.g., challenging automatic and maladaptive thoughts) can be incorporated into psychotherapy to cultivate a healthy and fulfilling sex life. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) describes a cluster of neurocognitive syndromes that present with impairment of executive functioning, changes in behavior, and a decrease in language proficiency. FTD is the second most common form of dementia in those younger than 65 years and is expected to increase in prevalence as the population ages. This goal in our review is to describe advances in the understanding of neurobiological pathology, classification, assessment, and treatment of FTD syndromes., Methods: PubMed was searched to obtain reviews and studies that pertain to advancements in genetics, neurobiology, neuroimaging, classification, and treatment of FTD syndromes. Articles were chosen with a predilection to more recent preclinical/clinical trials and systematic reviews., Results: Recent reviews and trials indicate a significant advancement in the understanding of molecular and neurobiological clinical correlates to variants of FTD. Genetic and histopathologic markers have only recently been discovered in the past decade. Current therapeutic modalities are limited, with most studies reporting improvement in symptoms with nonpharmacological interventions. However, a small number of studies have reported improvement of behavioral symptoms with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment. Stimulants may help with disinhibition, apathy, and risk-taking behavior. Memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors have not demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating FTD symptoms. Antipsychotics have been used to treat agitation and psychosis, but safety concerns and side effect profiles limit utilization in the general FTD population. Nevertheless, recent breakthroughs in the understanding of FTD pathology have led to developments in pharmacological interventions that focus on producing treatments with autoimmune, genetic, and molecular targets., Conclusion: FTD is an underdiagnosed group of neurological syndromes comprising multiple variants with distinct neurobiological profiles and presentations. Recent advances suggest there is an array of potential novel therapeutic targets, although data concerning their effectiveness are still preliminary or preclinical. Further studies are required to develop pharmacological interventions, as there are currently no US Food and Drug administration approved treatments to manage FTD syndromes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: Mallika Lavakumar received honorarium from Oakstone and receives research funding from the Health Research Services Administration. Rajesh R Tampi receives honorarium from Oakstone and royalties from Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Background: Consultation-liaison psychiatrists commonly perceive consultee satisfaction as a useful global measure of consultation-liaison service performance. No tool exists to measure consultee satisfaction. A single-site study at Columbia University Medical Center elicited ratings of parameters importantly contributing to consultee satisfaction within consultation-liaison services., Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the generalizability of the rating of importance of these parameters in a larger, multicenter sample., Methods: From October 2013 to January 2014, a confidential and voluntary Web-based survey was distributed to 133 physicians at 7 academic centers in the United States asking them to rate the importance of 16 performance parameters (identified in the previous single-site study) in determining consultee satisfaction., Results: Overall, 87 recipients (65%) responded to the survey. Among all the 16 items, there was no significant difference between sites in ratings of item importance. Of the 16 parameters, 9 received a mean rating in the "important" to "very important" range. Three items, "completion of consultation within 24 hours of request," "understanding the core questions being asked," and "practical and helpful management suggestions for medical staff" were rated as the most important. Quickly managing behavioral problems, management suggestions for nursing staff, verbal communication of recommendations, providing diagnostic clarification, facilitating transfer to inpatient psychiatry, and providing follow-up consultation were other parameters that were highly valued by consultees., Conclusions: We found good generalizability across academic medical centers for ratings of parameters important for consultee satisfaction with consultation-liaison services, which can provide the basis for a consultee satisfaction measurement tool., (Copyright © 2015 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is no consensus in the literature on measures for evaluating the performance of general hospital Consultation-Liaison psychiatry services., Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate what indicators might be used to this end., Methods: We surveyed United States Psychosomatic Medicine fellowship directors (n = 53) about the use of performance measures for their psychiatric consultation services. Results of this survey led to the construction of a second survey, which was distributed to the representatives of services calling for psychiatric consultations at our hospital (n = 21); this survey sought to determine the importance of various performance parameters to overall consultee satisfaction., Results: Sixty-three percent of responding psychiatric consult services do not use any of the parameters identified in the literature as performance measures. Consultee satisfaction was endorsed as a valuable performance indicator by 67.7% of them, but no satisfaction rating instrument was identified. The internal survey of consultees identified 11 of 16 candidate parameters as important or very important to consultee satisfaction, of which "consultant understands the core situation and the core question being asked" received the highest rating., Conclusions: Consultee satisfaction is perceived as a useful global measure of the effectiveness of a psychiatric consult service. We elicited parameters that can be used to create a measurement tool for consultee satisfaction with Consultation-Liaison services. The use of such a tool merits testing in a larger multicenter study., (Copyright © 2013 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)