Search

OBJECTIVE This scoping review will collate and summarize the current literature on what is known worldwide about organ donation following medical assistance in dying. The information gathered will be used to inform updates of current and future policies on organ donation following medical assistance in dying in Canada. INTRODUCTION Medical assistance in dying is a controversial and contentious issue worldwide. While more countries are legalizing medical assistance in this regard, very few allow organ donation after such assistance has been given. At present, Canada, Belgium, and The Netherlands are the only three countries that permit this procedure. This scoping review will be conducted to summarize the current state of evidence and practices regarding organ donation following medical assistance in dying. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review will consider articles and documents on individuals who choose organ donation following medical assistance in dying. Articles will be considered for inclusion if they explore organ donation following medical assistance in dying at home or in any health care setting in any country. Quantitative and qualitative studies, text and opinion papers, gray literature, and unpublished materials provided by researchers will be considered for inclusion. METHODS This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished materials will be included. Databases will include MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science - Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index, and Academic Search Complete. Relevant gray literature and materials from organ donation organizations will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen all material, extract data, and complete the descriptive examination.

Establishing when cerebral cortical activity stops relative to circulatory arrest during the dying process will enhance trust in donation after circulatory determination of death. We used continuous electroencephalography and arterial blood pressure monitoring prior to withdrawal of life sustaining measures and for 30 min following circulatory arrest to explore the temporal relationship between cessation of cerebral cortical activity and circulatory arrest. Qualitative and quantitative EEG analyses were completed. Among 140 screened patients, 52 were eligible, 15 were enrolled, 11 completed the full study, and 8 (3 female, median age 68 years) were included in the analysis. Across participants, EEG activity stopped at a median of 78 (Q1 = -387, Q3 = 111) seconds before circulatory arrest. Following withdrawal of life sustaining measures there was a progressive reduction in electroencephalographic amplitude (p = .002), spectral power (p = .008), and coherence (p = .003). Prospective recording of cerebral cortical activity in imminently dying patients is feasible. Our results from this small cohort suggest that cerebral cortical activity does not persist after circulatory arrest. Confirmation of these findings in a larger multicenter study are needed to help promote stakeholder trust in donation after circulatory determination of death.

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raised concerns for programs overseeing donation and transplantation of cells, tissues, and organs (CTO) that this virus might be transmissible by transfusion or transplantation. Transplant recipients are considered particularly vulnerable to pathogens because of immunosuppression, and SARS-CoV-2 is likely to generate complications if contracted. Several signs and symptoms observed in COVID-19 positive patients reflect damage to multiple organs and tissues, raising the possibility of extrapulmonary SARS-CoV-2 infections and risk of transmission. At the beginning of the pandemic, a consensus has emerged not to consider COVID-19 positive patients as potential living or deceased donors, resulting in a global decrease in transplantation procedures. Medical decision-making at the time of organ allocation must consider safely alongside the survival advantages offered by transplantation. To address the risk of transmission by transplantation, this review summarizes the published cases of transplantation of cells or organs from donors infected with SARS-CoV-2 until January 2021 and assesses the current state of knowledge for the detection of this virus in different biologic specimens, cells, tissues, and organs. Evidence collected to date raises the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication in some CTO, which makes it impossible to exclude transmission through transplantation. However, most studies focused on evaluating transmission under laboratory conditions with inconsistent findings, rendering the comparison of results difficult. Improved standardization of donors and CTO screening practices, along with a systematic follow-up of transplant recipients could facilitate the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk by transplantation.

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a therapeutic option for refractory cardiac arrest. We sought to perform an environmental scan to describe ECPR utilization in Canada and perceived barriers for application to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: This was a national cross-sectional study. We identified all cardiovascular surgery- and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-capable hospitals in Canada and emergency medical services (EMS) agencies delivering patients to those centres. We requested the medical lead from each hospital’s ECMO service and each EMS agency to submit data regarding ECMO and ECPR utilization, as well as perceived barriers to ECPR provision for OHCA. Results: We identified and received survey data from 39 of 39 Canadian hospital institutions and 21 of 22 EMS agencies. Of hospitals, 38 (97%) perform ECMO and 27 (69%) perform ECPR (74% of which perform ≤5 cases per year). Of the 18 (46%) sites offering ECPR for OHCA, 8 apply a formal protocol for eligibility and initiation procedures. EMS agencies demonstrate heterogeneity with intra-arrest transport practices. The primary rationale for nontransport of refractory OHCA is that hospital-based care offers no additional therapies. Perceived barriers to the use of ECPR for OHCA were primarily related to limited evidence supporting its use, rather than resources required. Conclusion: Many Canadian cardiovascular surgery- or ECMO-equipped hospitals use ECPR; roughly half employ ECPR for OHCAs. Low case volumes and few formal protocols indicate that this is not a standardized therapy option in most centres. Increased application may be dependent on a stronger evidence base including data from randomized clinical trials currently underway. Résumé: Contexte: La réanimation cardiorespiratoire (RCR) extracorporelle est une option thérapeutique en cas d'arrêt cardiaque réfractaire. Nous avons voulu faire une analyse contextuelle de l'utilisation de la RCR extracorporelle au Canada et des obstacles perçus quant à son emploi dans les cas d'arrêt cardiaque en dehors de l'hôpital. Méthodologie: Il s’agissait d’une étude nationale transversale. Nous avons repéré tous les hôpitaux en mesure d'effectuer des chirurgies cardiovasculaires et d'offrir l'oxygénation extracorporelle au Canada et les fournisseurs de services médicaux d'urgence (SMU) transportant les patients vers ces centres. Nous avons demandé au chef médical du service d'oxygénation extracorporelle de chacun des hôpitaux et de chacun des fournisseurs de SMU de présenter leurs données concernant l'utilisation de l'oxygénation extracorporelle et de la RCR extracorporelle, ainsi que les obstacles perçus quant à l'emploi de la RCR extracorporelle dans les cas d'arrêt cardiaque en dehors de l'hôpital. Résultats: Nous avons obtenu les données de 39 des 39 établissements hospitaliers canadiens ciblés, et de 21 des 22 fournisseurs de SMU. Parmi les hôpitaux, 38 (97%) utilisent l'oxygénation extracorporelle et 27 (69 %), la RCR extracorporelle (74 % ayant eu recours à celle-ci dans ≤ 5 cas par année). Parmi les 18 (46 %) centres offrant la RCR extracorporelle en cas d'arrêt cardiaque en dehors de l'hôpital, 8 appliquaient un protocole officiel pour l'admissibilité et les procédures de mise en place. Les fournisseurs de SMU ont montré des pratiques hétérogènes concernant la réanimation en déplacement. La principale raison justifiant de ne pas transporter les patients présentant un arrêt cardiaque réfractaire en dehors de l'hôpital est que les soins en milieu hospitalier n'offrent pas de traitements additionnels. Les obstacles perçus quant à l'emploi de la RCR extracorporelle dans les cas d'arrêt cardiaque en dehors de l'hôpital étaient principalement liés au peu de données appuyant son utilisation, plutôt qu'aux ressources nécessaires. Conclusion: De nombreux hôpitaux canadiens équipés pour la chirurgie cardiovasculaire et l'oxygénation extracorporelle utilisent la RCR extracorporelle; environ la moitié d'entre eux utilisent la RCR extracorporelle en cas d'arrêt cardiaque en dehors de l'hôpital. Le faible nombre de cas et le peu de protocoles officiels indiquent qu'il ne s'agit pas d'une option de traitement standardisée dans la plupart des centres. Une utilisation plus fréquente pourrait nécessiter davantage de données probantes, y compris les résultats des études cliniques à répartition aléatoire qui sont en cours.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted all aspects of the international organ donation and transplantation (ODT) system. Multiple organizations have developed guidance, but to date, no comparative summary has emerged to understand differences in existing recommendations. Methods We developed and applied a comparative methodology to a convenience sample of recommendations available on The Transplantation Society website. Document types were classified according to characteristics such as type of organization (e.g. governing body or professional society) and geographic region. Recommendations were grouped according to content and summaries were posted on a public website. This process is ongoing and will be updated as new recommendations become available. Results 18 documents were extracted in the initial review. All documents were based on expert opinion, and none described a formal literature review or adherence with clinical guideline development processes. Recommendation categories included screening of potential donors, risk assessment of potential recipients, post-transplant risk, living/paired donation, protection of ODT professionals, and ethics/logistics. While many documents included similar recommendations, such as the need to screen and test patients who are potential donors, there was variation on some topics. Type of recommended laboratory testing varied with 64% recommending nasopharyngeal swabs, 43% oropharyngeal, and 24% bronchial aspirates. Updated results are available at https://cdtrp.ca/en/covid-19-international-recommendations-for-odt/ CONCLUSION:: The current state of COVID-19 ODT recommendations are limited to expert opinion. Substantial variation exists regarding recommendations, which are based on emerging, but currently low-quality evidence. This summary of existing recommendations will serve to inform priorities for evidence-based recommendations.

We performed a systematic review of the literature to examine the effects of donor sodium levels on liver graft function and recipient survival, as well as to identify the optimal serum sodium target in donors. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and trial registries from 1946 to May 2019 for studies that evaluated the effect of serum sodium levels in neurologically deceased liver donors on transplant outcomes. We used a two-step review process with four independent reviewers to identify relevant articles based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. We summarize the results narratively, assess the risk of bias, and apply the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methods to evaluate the certainty in the evidence. We included 25 cohort studies were in our final analysis (total n = 19 389). Twenty-two reported on graft function and survival. Summary data suggest an association between donor serum sodium and recipient liver graft dysfunction, with very low certainty in evidence due to serious concerns with risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. Seven studies reported on recipient mortality, with results suggesting no association between donor sodium and recipient survival. The certainty in evidence for this outcome was also very low due to serious concerns with imprecision, indirectness, and risk of bias. Donor sodium dysregulation is associated with liver graft dysfunction, but not recipient mortality. Further research is needed to determine the effects of correcting donor sodium levels on transplant outcomes, quantify the dose-response curve, and identify liver recipients most vulnerable to sodium dysregulation.

There is international variability in the determination of death. Death in donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be defined by the permanent cessation of brain circulation. Post‐mortem interventions that restore brain perfusion should be prohibited as they invalidate the diagnosis of death. Retrieval teams should develop protocols that ensure the continued absence of brain perfusion during DCD organ recovery. In situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) or restarting the heart in the donor's body may interrupt the permanent cessation of brain perfusion because, theoretically, collateral circulations may restore it. We propose refinements to current protocols to monitor and exclude brain reperfusion during in situ NRP. In abdominal NRP, complete occlusion of the descending aorta prevents brain perfusion in most cases. Inserting a cannula in the ascending aorta identifies inadequate occlusion of the descending aorta or any collateral flow and diverts flow away from the brain. In thoracoabdominal NRP opening the aortic arch vessels to atmosphere allows collateral flow to be diverted away from the brain, maintaining the permanence standard for death and respecting the dead donor rule. We propose that these hypotheses are correct when using techniques that simultaneously occlude the descending aorta and open the aortic arch vessels to atmosphere., The authors present techniques to prevent the restoration of brain perfusion during in situ normothermic regional perfusion by ensuring the diversion of any possible collateral supply.

Objective The objective of this review is to develop a comprehensive description of burnout and compassion fatigue, including risk/protective factors, among organ and tissue donation coordinators worldwide. Introduction Research on turnover rates among organ and tissue donation coordinators has shown that job tenure generally lasts less than three years, a possible consequence of burnout and compassion fatigue. Increased turnover rates of organ and tissue donation coordinators have significant impact on the ability of ODOs to optimize organ donation. This current scoping review will help inform understanding of the nature of burnout and compassion fatigue in this population as well as the available strategies for managing it. Inclusion criteria Articles examining health care professionals working as organ and tissue donation coordinators, with the main concepts of interest being burnout and/or compassion fatigue, will be considered. Articles within the context of organ and tissue donation coordinators in acute care settings at any part of the organ donation process will also be considered for inclusion in this review. Quantitative and qualitative studies, text and opinion papers, unpublished material (eg, unpublished research data, reports, institutional protocols, government documents) provided by researchers in the organ donation field worldwide will also be examined for possible inclusion. Methods The scoping review will be performed in accordance with JBI methodology. Published and unpublished papers from 1980 to the present will be searched. Databases will include MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, PsycINFO, and PTSDpubs, while appropriate gray literature will be searched. Two reviewers will screen the papers according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extract data for specific variables, and perform descriptive examination.

ObjectiveTo collate and summarise the literature on the quality improvement tools that have been developed for deceased organ donation processes after circulatory determination of death and neurological determination of death.DesignScoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.Data sourcesWe searched for published (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science) and unpublished literature (organ donation organisation websites worldwide). The search was initially conducted on 17 July 2021 and updated on 1 June 2022. Included articles discussed the creation and/or use of quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes. Two independent reviewers screened the references, extracted and analysed the data.Results40 references were included in this review, and most records were written in English (n=38), originated in Canada (n=21), published between 2016 and 2022 (n=22), and were specific for donation after neurological determination of death (n=20). The tools identified included checklists, algorithms, flow charts, charts, pathways, decision tree maps and mobile apps. These tools were applied in the following phases of the organ donation process: (1) potential donor identification, (2) donor referral, (3) donor assessment and risk, (4) donor management, (5) withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, (6) death determination, (7) organ retrieval and (8) overall organ donation process.ConclusionsWe conducted a thorough investigation of the available quality improvement tools for deceased organ donation processes. The existing evidence lacks details in the report of methods used for development, testing and impact of these tools, and we could not locate tools specific for some phases of the organ donation process. Lastly, by mapping existing tools, we aim to facilitate both clinician choices among available tools, as well as research work building on existing knowledge.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the health system worldwide. The organ and tissue donation and transplantation (OTDT) system is no exception and has had to face ethical challenges related to the pandemic, such as risks of infection and resource allocation. In this setting, many Canadian transplant programs halted their activities during the first wave of the pandemic. Method To inform future ethical guidelines related to the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health emergencies of international concern, we conducted a literature review to summarize the ethical issues. Results This literature review identified three categories of ethical challenges. The first one describes the general ethical issues and challenges reported by OTDT organizations and transplantation programs, such as risks of COVID-19 transmission and infection to transplant recipients and healthcare professionals during the transplant process, risk of patient waitlist mortality or further resource strain where transplant procedures have been delayed or halted, and resource allocation. The second category describes ethical challenges related to informed consent in the context of uncertainty and virtual consent. Finally, the third category describes ethical issues related to organ allocation, such as social considerations in selecting transplant candidates. Conclusion This literature review highlights the salient ethical issues related to OTDT during the current COVID-19 pandemic. As medical and scientific knowledge about COVID-19 increases, the uncertainties related to this disease will decrease and the associated ethical issues will continue to evolve.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background. The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted health systems worldwide, including solid organ donation and transplantation programs. Guidance on how best to screen patients who are potential organ donors to minimize the risks of COVID-19 as well as how best to manage immunosuppression and reduce the risk of COVID-19 and manage infection in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) is needed. Methods. Iterative literature searches were conducted, the last being January 2021, by a team of 3 information specialists. Stakeholders representing key groups undertook the systematic reviews and generation of recommendations using a rapid response approach that respected the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations frameworks. Results. The systematic reviews addressed multiple questions of interest. In this guidance document, we make 4 strong recommendations, 7 weak recommendations, 3 good practice statements, and 3 statements of “no recommendation.” Conclusions. SOTr and patients on the waitlist are populations of interest in the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide decisions around deceased donation assessments and the management of SOTr and waitlist patients. Inclusion of these populations in clinical trials of therapeutic interventions, including vaccine candidates, is essential to guide best practices.

IntroductionThe physiology of dying after withdrawal of life-sustaining measures (WLSM) is not well described in children. This lack of knowledge makes predicting the duration of the dying process difficult. For families, not knowing this process’s duration interferes with planning of rituals related to dying, travel for distant relatives and emotional strain during the wait for death. Time-to-death also impacts end-of-life care and determines whether a child will be eligible for donation after circulatory determination of death. This scoping review will summarise the current literature about what is known about the dying process in children after WLSM in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs).Methods and analysisThis review will use Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Databases searched will include Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via EBM Reviews Ovid, Ovid PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science. Literature reporting on the physiology of dying process after WLSM, or tools that predict time of death in children after WLSM among children aged 0–18 years in PICUs worldwide will be considered. Literature describing the impact of prediction or timing of death after WLSM on families, healthcare workers and the organ donation process will also be included. Quantitative and qualitative studies will be evaluated. Two independent reviewers will screen references by title and abstract, and then by full text, and complete data extraction and analysis.Ethics and disseminationThe review uses published data and does not require ethics review. Review results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Pediatric donation after circulatory death (pDCD) is an established pathway for organ donation. It remains, however, a relatively rare event worldwide, and most clinicians outside of the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are unfamiliar with it. The goal of this review is to introduce the processes and concepts of pDCD. While most children die in circumstances that would not allow pDCD, many children that die after withdrawal of life sustaining therapy (WLST) may be eligible for donation of some organs. The potential benefits of this practice to patients on the wait list are well known, but donation can also be an opportunity to honor a patient's or family's desire to altruistically improve the lives of others. Offering the possibility of donation requires careful attention to ethical principles to ensure that conflicts of interest are avoided and that the family is free to make an independent, fully informed decision. Doing so allows families and decision makers the autonomy to decide if donation is something they wish to incorporate into end-of-life care.

Clinical researchers are now encouraged to include patient partners in all research projects. Nevertheless, published accounts of patient engagement in complex research projects, such as those involving critically ill and dying patients, are lacking. Whether this absence is due to the relatively new emergence of patient engagement research methods or fundamental challenges regarding family engagement in challenging research contexts is unclear. We describe our experiences with forming a researcher-family partnership in a deceased organ donation research project involving the prospective observation of potential and actual deceased organ donors dying in the intensive care unit. We used the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public evidence-based, consensus-informed reporting guidelines to organize our narrative. We were able to initiate and sustain a research consultant relationship with the mother of a deceased organ donor for over two years. Challenges faced included: constraints on money and time, communication preferences, and the emotional stress of participating in difficult conversations. Positive outcomes included: improvement of data collection tools, new opportunities for access to research populations, and motivation to include family partnership in future grant proposals. Family engagement in deceased organ donation research is feasible and contributes positively to study progress and outcomes. Patient and family engagement in challenging research contexts may require special attention to the emotional challenges of participation. We hope that our experience will encourage clinical researchers working in deceased organ donation and similarly complex domains to consider including patient partners in their projects.

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raised concerns for programs overseeing donation and transplantation of cells, tissues, and organs (CTO) that this virus might be transmissible by transfusion or transplantation. Transplant recipients are considered particularly vulnerable to pathogens because of immunosuppression, and SARS-CoV-2 is likely to generate complications if contracted. Several signs and symptoms observed in COVID-19 positive patients reflect damage to multiple organs and tissues, raising the possibility of extrapulmonary SARS-CoV-2 infections and risk of transmission. At the beginning of the pandemic, a consensus has emerged not to consider COVID-19 positive patients as potential living or deceased donors, resulting in a global decrease in transplantation procedures. Medical decision-making at the time of organ allocation must consider safely alongside the survival advantages offered by transplantation. To address the risk of transmission by transplantation, this review summarizes the published cases of transplantation of cells or organs from donors infected with SARS-CoV-2 until January 2021 and assesses the current state of knowledge for the detection of this virus in different biologic specimens, cells, tissues, and organs. Evidence collected to date raises the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication in some CTO, which makes it impossible to exclude transmission through transplantation. However, most studies focused on evaluating transmission under laboratory conditions with inconsistent findings, rendering the comparison of results difficult. Improved standardization of donors and CTO screening practices, along with a systematic follow-up of transplant recipients could facilitate the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk by transplantation.

Experiences of substitute decision-makers with requests for consent to non-therapeutic research participation during the dying process, including to what degree such requests are perceived as burdensome, have not been well described. In this study, we explored the lived experiences of family members who consented to non-therapeutic research participation on behalf of an imminently dying patient.We interviewed 33 family members involved in surrogate research consent decisions for dying patients in intensive care. Non-therapeutic research involved continuous physiological monitoring of dying patients prior to and for 30 min following cessation of circulation. At some study centres participation involved installation of bedside computers. At one centre electroencephalogram monitoring was used with a subset of participants. Aside from additional monitoring, the research protocol did not involve deviations from usual end-of-life care.Thematic analysis of interviews suggests most family members did not perceive this minimal-risk, non-therapeutic study to affect their time with patients during the dying process, nor did they perceive research consent as an additional burden. In our analysis, consenting for participation in perimortem research offered families of the dying an opportunity to affirm the intrinsic value of patients’ lives and contributions. This opportunity may be particularly important for families of patients who consented to organ donation but did not proceed to organ retrieval.Our work supports concerns that traditional models of informed consent fail to account for possible benefits and harms of perimortem research to surviving families. Further research into consent models which integrate patient and family perspectives is needed.

Background The minimum duration of pulselessness required before organ donation after circulatory determination of death has not been well studied. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of the incidence and timing of resumption of cardiac electrical and pulsatile activity in adults who died after planned withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in 20 intensive care units in three countries. Patients were intended to be monitored for 30 minutes after determination of death. Clinicians at the bedside reported resumption of cardiac activity prospectively. Continuous blood-pressure and electrocardiographic (ECG) waveforms were recorded and reviewed retrospectively to confirm bedside observations and to determine whether there were additional instances of resumption of cardiac activity. Results A total of 1999 patients were screened, and 631 were included in the study. Clinically reported resumption of cardiac activity, respiratory movement, or both that was confirmed by waveform analysis occurred in 5 patients (1%). Retrospective analysis of ECG and blood-pressure waveforms from 480 patients identified 67 instances (14%) with resumption of cardiac activity after a period of pulselessness, including the 5 reported by bedside clinicians. The longest duration after pulselessness before resumption of cardiac activity was 4 minutes 20 seconds. The last QRS complex coincided with the last arterial pulse in 19% of the patients. Conclusions After withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, transient resumption of at least one cycle of cardiac activity after pulselessness occurred in 14% of patients according to retrospective analysis of waveforms; only 1% of such resumptions were identified at the bedside. These events occurred within 4 minutes 20 seconds after a period of pulselessness. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and others.).

Aim Organ and Tissue Donation Coordinators (OTDCs) are healthcare professionals who manage deceased organ donation cases. This study investigated the experiences and perceptions of OTDCs, pertaining to compassion fatigue, burnout, and resilience as it relates to their daily work. Methodology A qualitative descriptive study was undertaken using semi-structured interviews conducted with a convenience sample of OTDCs. Setting A Canadian Organ Donation Organization. Findings Seven out of the ten OTDCs contacted participated in this study. Coordinators all agreed that they work in a high-pressure and demanding environment and the constant exposure to work-related stress and grief has resulted in the majority of them experiencing signs and symptoms of burnout and compassion fatigue occurring throughout their career. Participants described that the emotional toll of work-related stressors and difficult cases led them to use a variety of defence strategies to protect and support their well-being. They also recognised that more strategies to help mitigate work-related stressors and to prevent burnout and compassion fatigue are needed and that management and institutions should lead the development of such interventions. Conclusion Our results describe how coordinators’ mental health is affected by their daily work. Further research is needed to comprehensively examine these work-related stressors and to generate additional data to support the development of interventions to mitigate burnout and compassion fatigue among OTDCs.

ObjectivesTo collate and synthesise available literature on burnout and compassion fatigue (CF) among organ and tissue donation coordinators (OTDCs) and to respond to the research question: what is known about burnout and CF among OTDCs worldwide?DesignScoping review using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews.Data sourcesMedline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, PTSpubs and grey literature (ResearchGate, OpenGrey, Organ Donation Organization (ODO) websites, open access theses and dissertations) up to April 2020.Study selectionStudies reporting aspects of burnout and CF among OTDCs, including risk and protective factors.Data extractionTwo reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility and extracted data from chosen sources using a data extraction tool developed for this study; NVIVO was used to perform a qualitative directed content analysis.ResultsThe searches yielded 741 potentially relevant records, of which 29 met the inclusion criteria. The majority of articles were from the USA (n=7, 24%), Canada (n=6, 21%) and Brazil (n=6, 21%), published between 2013 and 2020 (n=13, 45%) in transplant journals (n=11, 38%) and used a qualitative design approach (n=12, 41%). In the thematic analysis, we classified the articles into five categories: (1) burnout characteristics, (2) CF characteristics, (3) coping strategies, (4) protective factors and (5) ambivalence.ConclusionWe identified aspects of burnout and CF among OTDCs, including defining characteristics, demographic predispositions, protective factors, coping strategies, precursors, consequences and personal ambivalences. Researchers described burnout and CF characteristics but did not use consistent terms when referring to CF and burnout, which may have hindered the identification of all relevant sources. This gap should be addressed by the application of consistent terminology, systematic approaches and appropriate research methods that combine quantitative and qualitative investigation to examine the underlying reasons for the development of burnout and CF among OTDCs.

To collate and summarize the literature on what quality improvement tools have been developed on safety of deceased organ donation processes for donation after circulatory determination of death and neurological determination of death.The increasing organ shortage requires that organ donation organizations take preventive measures to improve their processes and maximize organ donation opportunities. Quality improvement tools can be used to facilitate daily activities, prevent errors and enhance organ donation processes. Still, there is a paucity of comprehensive evidence around the use of these strategies to manage organ donation processes.Scoping review methodology according to the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science - Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index and Academic Search Complete. We will also conduct a web search of Google and request unpublished material (e.g., institutional protocols and quality improvement tools) from key stakeholders in the organ donation field worldwide and we will consider reports dated after 2000. Two independent reviewers will screen the literature against the inclusion criteria, extract data according to the data extraction tool and perform descriptive analysis. Results will be assembled, summarized and presented through tabular form accompanied by a narrative summary to answer the review question.Results from this scoping review will be used to develop and update quality improvement tools in decease organ donation, will be used to guide the second phase of a study aiming at developing a set of quality improvement tools to decease organ donation process, as well as these results can be used to inform future policy development in deceased organ donation.

Controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), where death is determined after cardiac arrest, has been responsible for the largest quantitative increase in Canadian organ donation and transplants, but not for heart transplants. Innovative international advances in DCD heart transplantation include direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). After death is determined, DPP involves removal and reanimation of the arrested heart on an ex situ organ perfusion system. Normothermic regional perfusion involves surgically interrupting (ligating the aortic arch vessels) brain blood flow after death determination, followed by restarting the heart and circulation in situ using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The objectives of this Canadian consensus building process by a multidisciplinary group of Canadian stakeholders were to review current evidence and international DCD heart experience, comparatively evaluate international protocols with existing Canadian medical, legal, and ethical practices, and to discuss implementation barriers. Review of current evidence and international experience of DCD heart donation (DPP and NRP) determined that DCD heart donation could be used to provide opportunities for more heart transplants in Canada, saving additional lives. Although candid discussion identified a number of potential barriers and challenges for implementing DCD heart donation in Canada, it was determined that DPP implementation is feasible (pending regulatory approval for the use of an ex situ perfusion device in humans) and in alignment with current medical guidelines for DCD. Nevertheless, further work is required to evaluate the consistency of NRP with current Canadian death determination policy and to ensure the absence of brain perfusion during this process.RéSUMé: Le don contrôlé après un décès circulatoire (DDC), cas dans lequel le décès est déterminé après un arrêt cardiaque, est à l’origine de la plus forte augmentation quantitative des dons et des transplantations d’organes au Canada, sauf pour les transplantations cardiaques. Parmi les progrès internationaux novateurs dans la transplantation cardiaque après DDC, citons l’obtention directe et perfusion (ODP) et la circulation régionale normothermique (CRN). Une fois le décès déterminé, l’ODP consiste à retirer et réanimer le cœur arrêté sur un système de perfusion ex situ. La circulation régionale normothermique consiste à interrompre de manière chirurgicale (en ligaturant les vaisseaux de l’arc aortique) le flux sanguin au cerveau après la détermination du décès, puis à redémarrer le cœur et la circulation in situ utilisant l’oxygénation par membrane extracorporelle (ECMO). Les objectifs de ce processus canadien d’établissement de consensus par un groupe multidisciplinaire d’intervenants canadiens étaient d’examiner les données probantes et les expériences internationales actuelles en matière de DDC, d’évaluer comparativement les protocoles internationaux par rapport aux pratiques médicales, juridiques et éthiques canadiennes existantes, et de discuter des obstacles à la mise en œuvre de tels protocoles. L’examen des données probantes et des expériences internationales actuelles en matière de don de cœur après DDC (ODP et CRN) a permis de déterminer que le don de cœur après DDC pourrait être utilisé afin de faire de plus nombreuses transplantations cardiaques au Canada, sauvant ainsi des vies supplémentaires. Bien que des discussions aient permis d’identifier plusieurs obstacles et défis potentiels à la mise en œuvre du don cardiaque après DDC au Canada, il a été déterminé que la mise en œuvre de l’ODP est réalisable (en attente de l’approbation réglementaire pour l’utilisation d’un dispositif de perfusion ex situ chez l’humain) et en accord avec les directives médicales actuelles concernant le DDC. Néanmoins, d’autres travaux sont nécessaires pour évaluer la conformité de la CRN aux politiques canadiennes actuelles de détermination de la mort et pour garantir l’absence de perfusion cérébrale au cours de ce processus.

KEY POINTS Demand for organs continues to exceed their availability, both in Canada and around the world.[1][1] Optimizing the medical management of potential organ donors is an important strategy for enhancing organ supply. The explicit goals for management of deceased organ donors in the intensive

Heart donation and transplantation following circulatory determination of death has yet to be performed in Canada. A consensus forum was held to provide expert guidance to inform policy with a comprehensive patient partner strategy. This paper describes the process used to create fulsome patient partner engagement resulting in mutually beneficial policy development in this complex area.A wide-ranging process for involving patient partners in this area included pre-meeting education, in-meeting expert support, full participation and permission to step back if desired, and post-meeting debriefing. Following the meeting, a questionnaire was used to guide a debrief discussion with patient partners and steering committee members who co-authored this paper.Five key themes arose that echoed the sentiments and contributions made by patient partners, including: 1) a strong desire to improve the system, 2) gratitude and honour, 3) expert support and process, 4) simplification of complex concepts, and 5) mutual benefit expressed by patient partners and healthcare professionals.Despite the complexity of the content and the emotionally sensitive nature of discussions around deceased organ donation, a well-planned strategy to involve patient partners is important, impactful, and central to the process. This suggests a broad interprofessional audience can engage with properly prepared and supported patient partners to strengthen and focus dialogue and outputs in the development of health policy in the donation and transplant sector.RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le don et la greffe cardiaque à la suite d’un décès circulatoire n’ont encore jamais été réalisés au Canada. Un forum de consensus a été organisé dans le but de formuler des recommandations spécifiques qui guideraient les politiques avec une stratégie globale incluant les patients partenaires. Cet article décrit le processus utilisé pour susciter une implication complète des patients partenaires, avec pour résultat la mise au point de politiques mutuellement bénéfiques dans ce domaine complexe. MéTHODE: Nous avons amorcé un vaste processus pour impliquer les patients partenaires dans ce domaine, processus qui a consisté en une formation préliminaire avant la rencontre, le soutien d’experts pendant la rencontre, la participation complète et la permission de se retirer du processus si désiré, et le débriefing après la rencontre. À la suite de la rencontre, un questionnaire a servi à orienter les discussions de débriefing avec les patients partenaires et les membres du comité directeur ayant collaboré à cet article. RéSULTATS: Cinq thèmes clés sont ressortis des discussions, faisant écho aux sentiments et aux contributions des patients partenaires, soit : 1) un profond désir d’améliorer le système, 2) la gratitude et l’honneur, 3) le soutien par et un processus d’experts, 4) la simplification des concepts complexes, et 5) les avantages mutuels exprimés par les patients partenaires et les professionnels de la santé. CONCLUSION: Malgré la complexité du contenu et la nature émotionnellement sensible des discussions entourant le don d’organes après décès, une stratégie bien planifiée d’implication des patients partenaires est importante, a un impact et doit être placée au centre du processus. Cela suggère qu’une vaste équipe interprofessionnelle peut s’impliquer auprès de patients partenaires bien préparés et convenablement soutenus; une telle approche permettra de renforcer et de concentrer le dialogue et les résultats lors de la mise au point de politiques de santé dans le secteur du don et de la greffe.

Good practice statements (GPSs) have been proposed by the GRADE working group as a way of avoiding the inappropriate characterization of evidence as low quality in support of strong recommendations justified by indirect evidence. This commentary examines how the GPS methodology was applied to the development of a recent guideline for pediatric deceased donation after circulatory determined death. This guideline was informed by a broad body of indirect literature and addressed a variety of social, legal, and ethical questions in addition to several implementation issues. While the resulting document contained a vast majority of GPS (63 as opposed to seven actionable GRADEd recommendations), we maintain that this application was appropriate to develop recommendations within the GRADE framework. This commentary explores how GPS may be applied in this context and explores whether a new classification of recommendations focused on these types of issues may be appropriate.

For a French translation of the executive summary, please see the Supplementary Material at DOI: 10.1017/cem.2017.429

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects 134 per 100,000 citizens annually. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), providing mechanical circulatory support, may improve the likelihood of survival among those with refractory OHCA. Compared with in-hospital ECPR candidates, those in the out-of-hospital setting tend to be sudden unexpected arrests in younger and healthier patients. The aims of this review were to summarize, and identify the limitations of, the evidence evaluating ECPR for OHCA, and to provide an approach for ECPR program application. Although there are many descriptions of ECPR-treated cohorts, we identified a paucity of robust data showing ECPR effectiveness compared with conventional resuscitation. However, it is highly likely that ECPR, provided after a prolonged attempt with conventional resuscitation, does benefit select patient populations compared with conventional resuscitation alone. Although reliable data showing the optimal patient selection criteria for ECPR are lacking, most implementations sought young previously healthy patients with rapid high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Carefully planned development of ECPR programs, in high-performing emergency medical systems at experienced extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centres, may be reasonable as part of systematic efforts to determine ECPR effectiveness and globally improve care. Protocol evaluation requires regional-level assessment, examining the incremental benefit of survival compared with standard care, while accounting for resource utilization.

OBJECTIVES: Create trustworthy, rigorous, national clinical practice guidelines for the practice of pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death in Canada. METHODS: We followed a process of clinical practice guideline development based on World Health Organization and Canadian Medical Association methods. This included application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Questions requiring recommendations were generated based on 1) 2006 Canadian donation after circulatory determination of death guidelines (not pediatric specific), 2) a multidisciplinary symposium of national and international pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death leaders, and 3) a scoping review of the pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death literature. Input from these sources drove drafting of actionable questions and Good Practice Statements, as defined by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation group. We performed additional literature reviews for all actionable questions. Evidence was assessed for quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation and then formulated into evidence profiles that informed recommendations through the evidence-to-decision framework. Recommendations were revised through consensus among members of seven topic-specific working groups and finalized during meetings of working group leads and the planning committee. External review was provided by pediatric, critical care, and critical care nursing professional societies and patient partners. RESULTS: We generated 63 Good Practice Statements and seven Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation recommendations covering 1) ethics, consent, and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, 2) eligibility, 3) withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy practices, 4) ante and postmortem interventions, 5) death determination, 6) neonatal pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death, 7) cardiac and innovative pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death, and 8) implementation. For brevity, 48 Good Practice Statement and truncated justification are included in this summary report. The remaining recommendations, detailed methodology, full Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tables, and expanded justifications are available in the full text report. CONCLUSIONS: This process showed that rigorous, transparent clinical practice guideline development is possible in the domain of pediatric deceased donation. Application of these recommendations will increase access to pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death across Canada and may serve as a model for future clinical practice guideline development in deceased donation.