Search

Amidst an ongoing conversation on the intersection of settler colonialism and gender, this introduction emphasizes the urgency for a continued gendered critique of settler colonialism and the imper...

Morphologically distinct TDP‐43 aggregates occur in clinically different FTLD‐TDP subtypes, yet the mechanism of their emergence and contribution to clinical heterogeneity are poorly understood. Several lines of evidence suggest that pathological TDP‐43 follows a prion‐like cascade, but the molecular determinants of this process remain unknown. We use advanced microscopy techniques to compare the seeding properties of pathological FTLD‐TDP‐A and FTLD‐TDP‐C aggregates. Upon inoculation of patient‐derived aggregates in cells, FTLD‐TDP‐A seeds amplify in a template‐dependent fashion, triggering neoaggregation more efficiently than those extracted from FTLD‐TDP‐C patients, correlating with the respective disease progression rates. Neoaggregates are sequentially phosphorylated with N‐to‐C directionality and with subtype‐specific timelines. The resulting FTLD‐TDP‐A neoaggregates are large and contain densely packed fibrils, reminiscent of the pure compacted fibrils present within cytoplasmic inclusions in postmortem brains. In contrast, FTLD‐TDP‐C dystrophic neurites show less dense fibrils mixed with cellular components, and their respective neoaggregates are small, amorphous protein accumulations. These cellular seeding models replicate aspects of the patient pathological diversity and will be a useful tool in the quest for subtype‐specific therapeutics., Pathological TDP‐43 derived from FTLD patient brains triggers de novo aggregation of physiological TDP‐43 in host cells via a prion‐like cascade. Different subtypes of FTLD‐TDP show distinct organization of TDP‐43 aggregates in patient brains, different seeding potencies, neoaggregate structures and C‐terminal serine phosphorylation timelines.