Search

Objective: To determine the impact of implementing emergency care pathway(s) for screening, diagnosing and managing women with gestational diabetes (GDM) during COVID‐19. Design: Retrospective multicentre cohort. Setting: Nine National Health Service (NHS) Hospital Trusts/Health boards in England and Scotland. Population: 4915 women with GDM pre‐pandemic (1 April 2018 to 31 March 2020), and 3467 women with GDM during the pandemic (1 May 2020 to 31 March 2021). Methods: We examined clinical outcomes for women with GDM prior to and during the pandemic following changes in screening methods, diagnostic testing, glucose thresholds and introduction of virtual care for monitoring of antenatal glycaemia. Main Outcome Measures: Intervention at birth, perinatal mortality, large‐for‐gestational‐age infants and neonatal unit admission. Results: The new diagnostic criteria more often identified GDM women who were multiparous, had higher body mass index (BMI) and greater deprivation, and less frequently had previous GDM (all p < 0.05). During COVID, these women had no differences in the key outcome measures. Of the women, 3% were identified with pre‐existing diabetes at antenatal booking. Where OGTT continued during COVID, but virtual care was introduced, outcomes were also similar pre‐ and during the pandemic. Conclusions: Using HbA1c and fasting glucose identified a higher risk GDM population during the pandemic but this had minimal impact on pregnancy outcomes. The high prevalence of undiagnosed pre‐existing diabetes suggests that women with GDM risk factors should be offered HbA1c screening in early pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The PROMPT Maternity Foundation aims to reduce preventable harm to mothers and babies in maternity care by making effective multi-professional training as widely available as possible [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To quantify the incidence of intrapartum risk factors in labours with an adverse outcome, and compare them with the incidence of the same indicators in a series of consecutive labours without adverse outcome. Design: Case–control study. Setting: Twenty‐six maternity units in the UK. Population or sample: Sixty‐nine labours with an adverse outcome and 198 labours without adverse outcome. Methods: Observational study. Main outcome measures: Incidence of risk factors in hourly assessments for 7 hours before birth in the two groups. Results: A risk score combining suspected fetal growth restriction, tachysystole, meconium in the amniotic fluid and fetal heart rate abnormalities (baseline rate and variability, presence of decelerations) gave the best indication of likely outcome group. Conclusions: Accurate risk assessment in labour requires fetal heart rate abnormalities to be considered in context with additional intrapartum risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the impact of implementing emergency care pathway(s) for screening, diagnosing and managing women with gestational diabetes (GDM) during COVID-19., Design: Retrospective multicentre cohort., Setting: Nine National Health Service (NHS) Hospital Trusts/Health boards in England and Scotland., Population: 4915 women with GDM pre-pandemic (1 April 2018 to 31 March 2020), and 3467 women with GDM during the pandemic (1 May 2020 to 31 March 2021)., Methods: We examined clinical outcomes for women with GDM prior to and during the pandemic following changes in screening methods, diagnostic testing, glucose thresholds and introduction of virtual care for monitoring of antenatal glycaemia., Main Outcome Measures: Intervention at birth, perinatal mortality, large-for-gestational-age infants and neonatal unit admission., Results: The new diagnostic criteria more often identified GDM women who were multiparous, had higher body mass index (BMI) and greater deprivation, and less frequently had previous GDM (all p < 0.05). During COVID, these women had no differences in the key outcome measures. Of the women, 3% were identified with pre-existing diabetes at antenatal booking. Where OGTT continued during COVID, but virtual care was introduced, outcomes were also similar pre- and during the pandemic., Conclusions: Using HbA1c and fasting glucose identified a higher risk GDM population during the pandemic but this had minimal impact on pregnancy outcomes. The high prevalence of undiagnosed pre-existing diabetes suggests that women with GDM risk factors should be offered HbA1c screening in early pregnancy., (© 2023 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To quantify the incidence of intrapartum risk factors in labours with an adverse outcome, and compare them with the incidence of the same indicators in a series of consecutive labours without adverse outcome., Design: Case-control study., Setting: Twenty-six maternity units in the UK., Population or Sample: Sixty-nine labours with an adverse outcome and 198 labours without adverse outcome., Methods: Observational study., Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of risk factors in hourly assessments for 7 hours before birth in the two groups., Results: A risk score combining suspected fetal growth restriction, tachysystole, meconium in the amniotic fluid and fetal heart rate abnormalities (baseline rate and variability, presence of decelerations) gave the best indication of likely outcome group., Conclusions: Accurate risk assessment in labour requires fetal heart rate abnormalities to be considered in context with additional intrapartum risk factors., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)