Search

Objective: The role of lifestyle habits in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is comparatively underexplored. We aim to examine the specific lifestyle habits in patients with LPRD., Methods: Systematic sampling was applied to select respondents aged 18 through 80 years in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) clinics in Nan Fang Hospital during August 2017-July 2018, 1658 eligible participants were included by a systematic sampling method. Subjects with RSI score>13 were considered as LPRD patients. The risk of reflux symptoms was estimated and multivariate calculated as odds ratios in relation to exposure to tobacco smoking, alcohol, coffee, tea, carbonated drinks, chocolate, spicy food, night sleep time, dinner-to-bed time, subjective sleep quality, and physical exercise., Results: There was a significant dose-response association between carbonated beverage and LPRD. Among people who had drinking carbonated drinks the odds ratio was 1.76 (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.24-2.50, P = .002) compared with non-carbonated drinker. A similar positive association was found for poor subjective sleep quality and shorter night sleeping time, the odds ratio for reflux was 1.58 (95% CI 1.14 to 2.18) among those who always have poor subjective sleep quality compared with those whose have good subjective sleep quality. The odds ratio for reflux was 2.29 (95% CI 1.23-4.28, P = .015) among those who always sleep 3-5 hours every night compared with those who sleep more than 8 hours every night. Beyond that, we found high BMI may have a negative correlation with LPRD, the odds ratio for reflux was .61 (95% CI 0.39 to .95, P = .054) among those whose BMI >25 kg/m2 compared with those BMI ≤ 20 kg/m2., Conclusions: Patients with LPRD may have certain lifestyle habits, avoid carbonated beverage, poor subjective sleep quality, and lack of sleep should be advised in treatment of LPRD., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in post-irradiated patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is unknown., Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 31 NPC and 12 control patients completed questionnaires for GERD/LPR before esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring. The DeMeester score and reflux finding score (RFS) were used to define GERD and LPR, respectively. Risk factors were identified., Results: 51.6% of NPC and 8.3% of control patients, and 77.4% of NPC and 33% of control patients, were GERD-positive and LPR-positive, respectively. The GERD/LPR questionnaire failed to identify either condition in patients with NPC. No parameter differences in esophageal manometry or pneumonia incidence were noted between GERD/LPR-positive and GERD/LPR-negative patients. Post radiotherapy duration, high BMI, lack of chemotherapy, and dysphagia were positive risk factors for GERD/LPR., Conclusions: A high prevalence of GERD/LPR in patients with post-irradiated NPC exists, but reflux symptoms are inadequate for diagnosis., (© 2024 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: To describe the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)-related symptoms in allergy patient using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) by Belafsky et al and the Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) by Lechien et al. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-two consecutive patients were asked to fill RSI. Similarly, 32 patients were asked to fill RSS. Demographic data included age, gender, history of smoking, family history for eczema, atopy, asthma, food and drug allergy., Results: Fifty-seven of the 84 patients were positive for at least one allergen and hence were diagnosed with allergy. Of the 52 patients who received the RSI, 36 patients were allergic to at least one allergen (36/52). Of the 32 patients who filled the RSS, 21 tested positive for at least one allergen (21/32). There was no significant difference in the number of positive RSI scores (>13) between patients with allergy to at least one allergen in comparison to patients with no allergy (P = 0.329). There was a significant difference in the number of positive RSS scores (>13) between patients with allergy to at least one allergen in comparison to patients with no allergy (P-value 0.0345). The odds of having RSS >13 in an allergic patient was significant (OR = 5.6, CI 95% = 1.15-27.37)., Conclusion: The results of this study provide evidence that patients with allergy have increased incidence of LPR related symptoms using the RSS. The cross-cutting in the clinical picture of patients with allergy and LPR stresses the need for objective testing such as double probe Ph-metry and impedance to diagnose this latter. Future studies are needed to explore further the cause-effect relationship between allergy and LPR., (Copyright © 2021 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify the characteristics of the time-point distribution of the occurrence of hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) in elderly and younger patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Analysis of data from patients with LPR-related symptoms and 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-hour HEMII-pH) monitoring from February 2017 to September 2022 at Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital., Methods: Patients were divided into 2 age groups: the elderly group (>60 years) and the younger group (≤60 years). The time series of HREs and meals within 24 hours were analyzed based on HEMII-pH., Results: A total of 305 patients were included (126 elderly patients). In younger patients, except for nonacid-gas HREs, the incidence of the remaining types of HREs tended to increase within 2 hours after meals, especially after dinner. The incidence of all types of HREs pre- and postmeal was not significantly different in the elderly group (χ 2  = 0.080, P = .777). The incidence of nighttime HREs in elderly patients was statistically higher than in younger patients (6.23% vs 3.96%, P = .030), particularly acid-/nonacid-liquid HREs., Conclusion: HREs tend to increase within 2 hours after meals in younger LPR patients, except for nonacid-gas HREs. In elderly LPR patients, the incidence of all types of HREs pre- and postmeal were not significantly different, and nighttime fluid HREs was more prone to occur than in younger patients., (© 2023 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.)

Purpose: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are common gastrointestinal disorders with extraesophageal manifestations (EGERD). Studies showed a correlation between GERD/LPR and ocular discomfort. Our aim was to report the prevalence of ocular involvement in patients with GERD/LPR, describe clinical and biomolecular manifestations, and provide a treatment strategy for this novel EGERD comorbidity., Methods: Fifty-three patients with LPR and 25 healthy controls were enrolled in this masked randomized controlled study. Fifteen naive patients with LPR were treated with magnesium alginate eye drops and oral therapy (magnesium alginate and simethicone tablets) with a 1-month follow-up. Clinical ocular surface evaluation, Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, tear sampling, and conjunctival imprints were performed. Tear pepsin levels were quantified by ELISA. Imprints were processed for human leukocyte antigen-DR isotype (HLA-DR) immunodetection and for HLA-DR, IL8, mucin 5AC (MUC5AC), nicotine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) transcript expression (PCR)., Results: Patients with LPR had significantly increased Ocular Surface Disease Index ( P < 0.05), reduced T-BUT ( P < 0.05), and higher meibomian gland dysfunction ( P < 0.001) compared with controls. After treatment, tear break-up time (T-BUT) and meibomian gland dysfunction scores improved to normal values. Pepsin concentration increased in patients with EGERD ( P = 0.01) and decreased with topical treatment ( P = 0.0025), significantly. HLA-DR, IL8, and NADPH transcripts were significantly increased in the untreated versus controls and comparable significant values were obtained after treatment ( P < 0.05). MUC5AC expression significantly increased with treatment ( P = 0.005). VIP transcripts were significantly higher in EGERD than in controls and decreased with the topical treatment ( P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in NPY., Conclusions: We report an increase in prevalence of ocular discomfort in patients with GERD/LPR. The observations of VIP and NPY transcripts demonstrate the potential neurogenic nature of the inflammatory state. Restoration of the ocular surface parameters suggests the potential usefulness of topical alginate therapy., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the risk factors for the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged, and to analyze the characteristics of patients with pneumonia. Methods: Patients who underwent 24-hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring from June 2020 to July 2022 and the positive patients of those who underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring from March 2017 to July 2022 at the Second Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital were enrolled retrospectively. Positive results of 24-hour laryngopharyngeal reflux monitoring were in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group, and the negative results were in the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group. Patients with pneumonia and simple gastroesophageal reflux disease were in the esophageal reflux pneumonia group, and patients with pneumonia and simple laryngopharyngeal reflux disease were in the laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group. Patients' basic data, co-morbidities, drug use and relevant examination and test results were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged and its relationship with pneumonia. Results: A total of 80 patients with 24-hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring were enrolled finally, including 34 cases, all male, aged (73±12) years, in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group, and 46 cases [44 males, 2 females, aged (78±11) years] in the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included age ≤70 years ( OR =13.07, 95% CI : 2.53-67.68), body mass index (BMI) ( OR =1.37, each additional 1 kg/m 2 , 95% CI : 1.03-1.83), use of antipsychotic drugs ( OR =8.00, 95% CI : 1.40-45.73) and calcium channel blockers ( OR =5.27, 95% CI : 1.13-24.53) (all P <0.05). The protective factors of the laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included antacids ( OR =0.19, 95% CI : 0.04-0.90, P =0.035). The incidence of pneumonia was higher in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group compared with the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group [44.1% (15/34) vs 21.7% (10/46), P =0.033]. The esophageal reflux pneumonia group included 32 cases [31 males and 1 females, aged (84±12) years]. The laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group included 15 cases [ 15 males, aged (79±11) years]. Compared to the patients in the laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group, the patients in the esophageal reflux pneumonia group had a longer course of antibiotics [(27.7±27.0) vs (14.6±13.9) days, P =0.034], a higher frequency of seizure frequency [(4.3±3.0) vs (1.8±1.5) times/year, P <0.001] and a higher maximal body temperature [(38.2±0.9) vs (37.6±1.1) ℃, P =0.037]. Conclusions: The risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included age ≤70 years, higher BMI, use of antipsychotic drugs and calcium channel blockers. The incidence of pneumonia in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease is higher, but the condition of pneumonia is milder.

Background: Over the last few decades, reflux diseases, such as laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), have been identified as significant contributors to inflammatory upper aerodigestive tract diseases. Establishing a direct relationship between reflux disease and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is challenging due to the high prevalence of both diseases and their potential for independent coexistence., Objective: The purpose of this study is to review the existing literature and evaluate the evidence of an association between reflux diseases and CRS., Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across multiple databases to identify all studies that investigated the relationship between LPR, GERD, and CRS from January 1, 1950, to June 16, 2022. Only studies with English manuscripts involving adult populations were included, while case series, case reports, and in vitro studies were excluded. The risk of bias was evaluated using The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies and the NIH quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies., Results: The search strategy yielded a total of 427 articles, out of which 25 studies examined the correlation between reflux diseases and CRS. The meta-analysis indicated a significant association between the presence of GERD and CRS compared to control groups ( P  < .001; CI 3.56 [2.25, 5.65]), as well as significantly higher pH values and pepsin detection in CRS patients when compared to healthy individuals ( P  = .003). Furthermore, all studies that evaluated proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in CRS patients reported positive outcomes, with 93% of CRS patients showing improvement on PPIs., Conclusion: The existing literature provides suggestive evidence of an association between reflux diseases and CRS, with regards to both prevalence and treatment. Nonetheless, further studies are required to confirm this relationship., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Vocal tract discomfort (VTD), dysphonia, and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms are complaints frequently reported by amateur singers. There are two aims of this study. The first is to evaluate the prevalence of these symptoms using validated questionnaires. The second is to correlate singing-related variables with the questionnaire responses., Methods: A total of 392 amateur choir singers (ACS) and 514 control subjects completed an online survey divided into four parts: (1) clinical and demographic characteristics, (2) training in singing and singing experience, (3) history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and LPR symptoms, (4) validated questionnaires. Specifically, the reflux symptom index (RSI), the vocal tract discomfort scale (VTDS), and the voice symptom scale (VoiSS) were included to analyze the actual burden related to LPR symptoms, VTD, and dysphonia., Results: ACS demonstrated a healthier lifestyle and a lower prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in comparison with control subjects. ACS scored significantly higher in VTDS and VoiSS than control subjects, while no differences in the RSI results were found. Significant correlations among the questionnaires' results were demonstrated. Occasional professional singing was the variable influencing VTDS and VoiSS results the most., Conclusion: ACS do not evidently manifest a higher impairment connected to LPR (RSI score), while they do report higher levels of voice (VoiSS score) and vocal tract (VTDS score) impairments, in comparison with control subjects. The relevant correlations among the PRO measures suggest that LPR symptoms, VTD, and dysphonia are related to each other. Given the relevant repercussion on the severity of VTD and dysphonia, providers should specifically ask about occasional professional singing when treating amateur singers., Competing Interests: Declarations of interest None, (Copyright © 2021 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with many chronic diseases among which is laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD)., Objective: To investigate the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)-related symptoms in patients with OSA using the Reflux Symptoms Score (RSS) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI)., Methods: The medical records and video-recordings of patients with OSA who presented to a tertiary referral center were reviewed. The diagnosis of OSA was made using the STOP-BANG questionnaire and/or polysomnography. The prevalence of LPR-related symptoms was assessed using both the RSS and RSI questionnaires., Results: Thirty-nine patients were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients (69.2%) had a positive RSS in comparison to only 7 (17.9%) using the RSI ( p  = .052). Subgroup analysis of those who had polysomnography ( n  = 24) showed that 18 patients (75%) had a positive RSS in comparison to only 5 patients (20.8%) using the RSI. Patients in the high-risk category for OSA were also found to have a higher prevalence of LPR-related symptoms using both the RSS and RSI questionnaires in comparison to those in the lower risk categories., Conclusion: The results of this investigation indicate that the prevalence of LPR-related symptoms is higher using the RSS in comparison to the RSI.

Objective: To analyze the incidence of pharyngeal reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients over a 24-hour period and find out the key timing of pharyngeal reflux., Methods: We reviewed 69 patients who visited our clinic with LPR-related symptoms and were proven to have pharyngeal reflux via 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24hr MII-pH) monitoring. Quantitative analysis was conducted for the LPR profiles, such as the acidity of reflux, nighttime reflux, and positional reflux. The time series of pharyngeal reflux episodes and mealtimes were analyzed over a 24-hour period. Also, we recruited 26 normal controls. We compared the timing of pharyngeal reflux between LPR patients and asymptomatic controls., Results: The quantitative analysis revealed that pharyngeal reflux occurred 4.88 ± 4.59 times over 24 hours. Weakly acidic pharyngeal reflux was more abundant than acidic or weakly alkaline reflux. Pharyngeal reflux occurred mainly during daytime in the upright position. The most frequent timing of pharyngeal reflux episodes was within 2 hours after meals. Additionally, there was no significant difference of the timing of post-prandial reflux between LPR patients and asymptomatic controls., Conclusion: The key timing of pharyngeal reflux in patients with LPR was post-prandial 2 hours., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To investigate the characteristics of the time-point distribution of the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) by 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (24 h MII-pH) and to provide guidance for the development of individualized anti-reflux strategies for LPR patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 24 h MII-pH data from 408 patients [339 males and 69 females, aged 23-84 (55.08±11.08) years] attending the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery at the Sixth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from January 2013 to March 2020. The number of gas acid/weak-acid reflux, mixed gas-liquid acid/weak-acid reflux, liquid acid/weak-acid reflux and alkaline reflux events at different time points were recorded and statistically analyzed through SPSS 26.0 software. Results: A total of 408 patients were included. Based on the 24 h MII-pH, the total positive rate of LPR was 77.45% (316/408). The type of positive gaseous weak-acid reflux was significantly higher than the remaining types of LPR (χ 2 =297.12, P <0.001). Except the gaseous weak-acid reflux, the occurrence of the remaining types of LPR showed a tendency to increase after meals, especially after dinner. Liquid acid reflux events occurred mainly between after dinner and the following morning, and 47.11% (57/121) of them occurred within 3 h after dinner. There was a significant positive association between Reflux Symptom Index scores and gaseous weak-acid reflux( r= 0.127, P <0.01), liquid acid reflux( r =0.205, P <0.01) and liquid weak-acid reflux( r= 0.103, P <0.05)events. Conclusions: With the exception of gaseous weak-acid reflux events, the occurrence of the remaining types of LPR events has a tendency to increase after meals, especially after dinner. Gaseous weak-acid reflux events accounts for the largest proportion of all types of LPR events, but the pathogenic mechanisms of gaseous weak-acid reflux are needed to further investigate.

Objectives/hypothesis: To evaluate the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the potential association between presence of LPR symptoms and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a representative sample from a population-based study., Study Design: Cross-sectional study., Methods: Participants of the follow-up of the Epidemiological Sleep Study were evaluated. Sleep was assessed through questionnaires and polysomnography. The presence of LPR was based on the questionnaire Reflux Score Index (RSI), and scores higher than 13 were suggestive of LPR. A general linear model test was used for comparison of continuous data and Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Predictors of LPR were obtained by regression analysis., Results: 701 were enrolled (54.8% female, 45.2% male; mean age, 50.2 ± 13.3 years). The mean apnea-hypopnea index score was 17 ± 18.3 events/hr, and the mean RSI score was 7.0 ± 8.1. LPR was found in 17% of the volunteers, whereas OSA was present in 38.5% of the sample. Specifically, in those patients with OSA, the prevalence of LPR was 45.4%; however, there was no statistically significant association between LPR and the presence of OSA. The severity of OSA was not associated with RSI score. The presence of LPR was associated with older age, smoking, excessive daytime sleepiness and worse quality of life and sleep scores questionnaires., Conclusions: Age, smoking, but not body mass index, were associated with LPR. There was not statistically significant association of LPR with OSA. Individuals with symptoms of LPR had greater drowsiness and worse quality of life and sleep., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1877-1882, 2022., (© 2022 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of insomnia in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to analyze the relationship between the severity of insomnia and LPR-related symptoms., Methods: We analyzed 69 patients with LPR and 61 healthy controls. The LPR was confirmed via the 24-h hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. Reflux symptoms and sleep disturbances were assessed using the Reflux Symptom Index and Insomnia Severity Index. We compared the prevalence of insomnia between the two groups. We analyzed the relationship between reflux symptoms and severity of insomnia., Results: The prevalence of insomnia was significantly higher in patients with LPR than in healthy controls (46.3% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.049). The severity of reflux-related symptoms was correlated with insomnia severity (rho = 0.44; p < 0.001). Patients with LPR with nighttime reflux were more likely to have sleep disturbances than patients with LPR without nighttime reflux., Conclusion: Patients with LPR are more likely to experience insomnia than healthy controls, and the severity of reflux symptoms was related to the severity of insomnia., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background/purpose: This study aimed to explore the anatomical and physiological characteristics of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms, such as hoarseness, throat clearing, throat pain, globus, and chronic cough, with the novel high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM)., Methods: Consecutive patients exhibited at least one LPR symptom for ≥4 weeks after 2-month proton-pump inhibitor treatment were enrolled during November 2014 and March 2018 from single tertiary medical center. All patients completed validated symptom questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and HRIM. Healthy volunteers were also recruited for comparison of esophageal parameters on HRIM., Results: Eighty-nine LPR patients and 63 healthy volunteers were analyzed. Compared with healthy volunteers, LPR patients had significantly shorter upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES and LES), a shorter intraabdominal esophagus (all P < 0.01), higher 4-s integrated relaxation pressures (IRP-4s) (P = 0.011) of the LES. After adjusted for age, sex, body weight, body height and alcohol consumption, multiple regression analysis showed that age, LES IRP-4s and the UES length were independent risk factors for LPR symptoms (OR 1.056, 95% CI 1.019-1.094; OR 1.107, 95% CI 1.004-1.222; OR 0.432, 95% CI 0.254-0.736, respectively). In subgroup analysis, patients with moderate LPR symptoms had lower IRP-4s (6.64 ± 4.55 vs. 8.69 ± 5.10, P = 0.049) and more failed peristalsis (27.33 ± 29.26 vs. 11.36 ± 21.20, P = 0.004) than those with mild LPR symptoms., Conclusion: Our study suggests that esophageal structural factors and LES IRP-4s may contribute to the occurrence of LPR symptoms. Patients with moderate LPR symptoms were more likely to present with failed peristalsis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2021 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of esophageal disorders among voice patients with intractable laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) who have undergone 24 pH impedance and esophageal manometry., Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with LPR-associated dysphonia in the absence of subjective dysphagia who presented between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2019 and underwent 24 pH impedance and esophageal manometry studies after inadequate response to lifestyle modifications, high dose of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPIs), H2 blockers, alkaline water, and Gaviscon (GlaxoSmithKline, Warren, NJ, USA). The comorbidities, medications, Strobovideolaryngoscopy findings, 24 pH impedance, and esophageal manometry results were analyzed., Results: The study included 109 patients ages 19 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 51.5 (SD 16.8). About 24.8% of the 109 subjects were found to have peristaltic wave abnormalities indicating esophageal dysmotility (11% with esophageal stasis). Lower esophageal sphincter pressures were normotensive in 56.9% of patients, hypertensive in 24.8%, and hypotensive in 18.4% of patients. In addition, the upper esophageal sphincter pressures were normotensive in 57.8% of patients, hypertensive in 36.7%, and hypotensive in 2.8% of patients. About 12.6% had both lower esophageal sphincter and upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction (hypertensive or hypotensive). The average total reflux events in patients exhibiting dysmotility on manometry 101.81, which was significantly higher compared with the mean total of 61.28 in the group of patients without dysmotility (P= 0.0396). In addition, there was a significantly higher prevalence of total events that were weakly acidic in the group with dysmotility compared with the group without (all patients performed the study on reflux medications, mean of total weakly acidic events 70.2 in dysmotility group vs 44.2 in normal motility group, P= 0.0427).Finally, the average number of total supine reflux events and the total acidic supine events were both significantly higher in the dysmotility group compared with the group without motility problems (P = 0.0199 and P = 0.0213, respectively)., Conclusion: Esophageal dysmotility may be a significant cofactor in voice patients with refractory LPR on appropriate reflux medications and lifestyle modifications. Further research is advised., (Copyright © 2020 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Many patients are assessed for chronic symptoms including: dysphonia, 'globus', throat clearing, postnasal secretions and cough; commonly grouped together and attributed to 'laryngopharyngeal reflux'. This study aimed to explore a clinical trial's baseline dataset for patterns of presenting symptoms, which might provide a more rational basis for treatment., Design: Baseline data were analysed for participants entering the Trial Of Proton-Pump Inhibitors in Throat Symptoms: age, body mass index, Reflux Symptom Index, Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux-Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire and Reflux Finding Score (RFS-endoscopic examination). The relationships between the questionnaires and demographic factors were assessed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on individual symptom items in the combined questionnaires. The EFA factors were applied to a Cluster Analysis of participants, to explore the presence of identifiable patient., Results: Throat clearing and globus were the highest ranked scores in the 344 participants. Increasing age was inversely associated with symptom severity (p<0.01). There was no relationship between the RFS and any of the three questionnaires. EFA resulted in a seven-factor model with clinically meaningful labels: voice, cough, gastrointestinal symptoms, airway symptoms and dysphagia, throat clearing, lump in throat, and life events. Cluster analysis failed to demonstrate any clinically meaningful clusters of patients., Conclusion: This study offers a framework for future research and demonstrates that individual symptoms cannot be used to group patients. The analysis supports the use of a broad 'umbrella' term such as persistent throat symptoms., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN38578686., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common disorder, accounting for up to 35% of the general population. Therefore, we hypothesized that laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), inducing refluxate rising into airways, may involve the ocular surface and may either induce or worsen DED., Aim: To investigate the prevalence and relevance of suspected LPR in DED patients and subjects with refractive problems (RP) without DED, they were defined as non-dry eye group (NEG) in clinical practice., Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients evaluated because of dry eye-like symptoms at eight tertiary ophthalmological clinics. Parameters included reflux symptom index (RSI), ocular surface disease index (OSDI), symptom assessment in dry eye (SANDE) for frequency and severity, Schirmer test, tear break-up time (BUT), and Oxford grading., Results: The study included 245 subjects (72.5% females; mean age 56.3 years), 152 DED patients, and 93 sex- and age-matched NEG subjects. Pathological RSI (score>13) was detected in 80 subjects (32.6%); 68 (85%) with DED and 12 (15%) CG (OR = 8; p < .0001). In NEG, pathological RSI was associated with higher SANDE (Frequency and Severity), OSDI, and Schirmer scores (OR = 16.36; 14.51; 12.54; and 7.22, respectively. In DED patients, pathological RSI was associated with higher OSDI values (OR = 8.75)., Conclusion: Patients with DED are at eight times higher risk for having pathological RSI than NEG patients. Moreover, pathological RSI was associated with more severe ocular symptoms both in DED and non-DED patients. The role of LPR in definite DED patients remains to be clarified, but this condition deserves to be investigated in managing patients with DED symptoms.

Background: This study aimed to explore the characteristics of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the association between LPR and allergic rhinitis (AR)., Methods: In this prospective case-control study, a total of 102 patients with suspected LPR who visited the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, between June 2019 and June 2021 were consecutively included. They were divided into the LPR-positive group and the LPR-negative group according to 24-h Dx-pH monitoring. The influencing factors of LPR, including the scores for AR (SFAR) and AR prevalence, were compared between the two groups., Results: The total SFAR and scores in items 1, 3, 4, and 5 of the LPR-positive group were significantly higher than those of the LPR-negative group (p < 0.05). The prevalence of AR in the LPR-positive group was 60%, which was significantly higher than that in the LPR-negative group (36.54%) (p < 0.05). After excluding confounding factors, AR was positively correlated with the incidence of LPR, and the incidence of LPR with AR was 2.372 times that of non-AR. Receiver operating characteristic curve results show that AR has the highest predictive value for LPR, and the area of AR under the curve is was 0.617., Conclusions: The SFAR and incidence of AR are high in patients with positive LPR, and AR may be a risk factor for LPR. The results of this study may deepen our understanding of the occurrence of LPR., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: This study aims to investigate the detection rates, common symptoms and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) at the digestive endoscopy center., Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey conducted at three hospitals and a total of 565 eligible participants were enrolled. All the patients completed routine ENT examination, gastroscopy, gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire (GerdQ), reflux symptom index (RSI) and a self-designed 25-item symptoms table survey., Results: Among the 565 eligible participants, the detection rates of GERD and LPRD were 18.41% (104/565) and 9.91% (56/565), respectively. The detection rate of GERD combined with LPRD was 3.19% (18/565). Among GERD and LPRD patients, males (vs. females), middle-aged and elderly patients (vs. young people), BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m 2 (vs. BMI < 24.0 kg/m 2 ), with current smoking history (vs. no smoking), and current drinking history (vs. no drinking), lying down immediately after meal (vs. no lying down immediately after meal) were significantly higher (all p < 0.05). The most common extraesophageal symptoms in patients with GERD were dry mouth (66.35%), globus sensation (56.73%), dry throat and pharyngeal itching (55.77%). The most common extraesophageal symptoms in patients with LPRD were globus sensation (91.07%), dry throat and pharyngeal itching (83.93%), and dry mouth (82.14%)., Conclusion: GERD and LPRD had a high detection rate at the digestive endoscopy center in Guangzhou, China. Older age, BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m 2 , smoking and drinking history were risk factors for both GERD and LPRD. Neither GerdQ nor RSI scores included common extraesophageal symptoms., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The purpose of this article is to review the cornerstone and most recent literature regarding laryngopharynoesophageal reflux (LPR) including epidemiological characteristics, pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and management. The role of pepsin in the pathophysiology of LPR is highlighted in addition to new diagnostic modalities and pharmacologic therapies that target pepsin., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives/hypothesis: To investigate whether there is an impact of obesity and overweight on the clinical findings and therapeutic responses of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)., Study Design: Prospective uncontrolled., Methods: Patients with LPR-related symptoms and positive LPR diagnosis at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH) were recruited from December 2017 to December 2020. Patients were treated with a combination of diet, proton pump inhibitors, and alginate for 3 to 6 months. The following outcomes were studied according to the weight of patients: HEMII-pH, gastrointestinal endoscopy features, symptoms, findings, and therapeutic response., Results: A total of 262 patients completed the study, accounting for 134, 85, and 43 patients with normal weight (body mass index [BMI] <25), overweight (BMI = 25-29.99), and obesity (BMI >30). Obese patients reported significant higher prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), acid LPR, and a more severe LPR disease regarding the number of pharyngeal reflux events, reflux symptom score (RSS), and reflux sign assessment (RSA). RSS and RSA scores significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment irrespective of the patient weight group. Symptoms and signs continued to improve from 3 to 6-month posttreatment only in patients with a normal weight., Conclusion: Obesity is associated with a more severe LPR disease and a higher proportion of GERD and acid LPR. Obese LPR patients may require more frequently PPI-therapy regarding the higher prevalence of GERD., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2742-E2748, 2021., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Background: Paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM) is a disorder in which the vocal folds adduct inappropriately during inspiration resulting in episodic dyspnea and sometimes respiratory distress. Diagnosis is obtained through careful history, physical examination, flexible laryngoscopic examination with provocative maneuvers, and laryngeal electromyography. The pathogenesis and clinical findings of this disorder are not known., Objectives: To determine characteristics of patients with confirmed PVFM and to evaluate efficacy of current treatments., Methods: A retrospective chart review of the patients with PVFM who presented at a quaternary care laryngology office between January 1, 2007 and August 31, 2019 was performed. Comorbidities, laboratories tests, imaging, 24-hours pH impedance testing, and laryngeal EMG results were analyzed. Dyspnea Index questionnaire before and after treatment was used to evaluate the efficiency of treatments for PVFM., Results: The average age of the 40 patients was 30.25 years. Forty-five percent of patients were under the age of 18, and 80% were female. Twenty-five percent of patients were serious athletes, and 40% of patients were students. Sixty-five percent had a previous diagnosis of asthma. One third of patients had concurrent psychiatric diagnosis. There was no family history of PVFM in the cohort. There were no other common findings. Treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) was used only when there was evidence of LPR; and 93% of our 40 patients received LPR treatment. Ninety percent of patients who received botulinum toxin, voice therapy (VT), and LPR treatment had subjective improvement. Patients with just VT and LPR treatment had a 43% subjective improvement rate; and the difference was statistically significant at P of 0.021. There was no statistical difference between VT and LPR treatment versus VT or LPR treatment alone., Conclusion: Botulinum toxin, VT, and LPR treatment regimen is currently the most effective management for patients with paradoxical vocal fold movement disorder. More research is needed to determine the etiology of this disorder., (Copyright © 2020 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives/hypothesis: To investigate the prevalence and features of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS)., Study Design: Prospective uncontrolled study., Methods: Patients who visited our Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck and Maxillofacial surgery with BMS were prospectively recruited from September 2018 to September 2020. Patients benefited from dental, maxillofacial, otolaryngological examinations, and hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH). Oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal findings and symptoms were rated with Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12). Patients were treated with a combination of diet, pantoprazole, and alginate., Results: From the 81 included patients, 76 reported >1 pharyngeal reflux events (93.8%), accounting for 35 (46.1%), 24 (31.6%), and 17 (22.3%) acid, mixed, and nonacid LPR, respectively. Thirty-two patients had both LPR and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Thirty-eight patients benefited from pepsin saliva measurement, which was positive in 86.8% of cases. The mean scores of mouth/tongue burning, RSS-12, and RSA significantly improved from pre- to post-treatment (P < .004). At 3-month post-treatment, 62.5% of patients reported an improvement of mouth/tongue burning score. Patients with both GERD and LPR reported higher baseline RSS-12 and RSA scores., Conclusion: Acid, weakly acid, and nonacid LPR may be involved in the development of BMS. The use of an appropriate treatment considering the reflux features is associated with an improvement of symptoms and findings., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2627-E2633, 2021., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc..)

There is a lack of evidence to show prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the association between LPR and dietary factors. Adolescents consume the most amount of free sugars among the Chinese population. We conducted this study to investigate the prevalence of LPR in Chinese adolescents and explore the association between free sugars consumption and LPR. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1517 middle school students in Hunan, China. An online questionnaire was applied to collect data on the condition of LPR, consumption of free sugars and other self-reported covariates. Height, weight and waist circumference were collected by anthropometric measurements. Logistic regression was applied to assess the association between LPR and free sugars consumption. The mean and standard deviation of free sugars consumption was 53.14 ± 44.75 (g/d). The prevalence of LPR was 8.11%. A positive association was observed between LPR and higher free sugars consumption after adjusted multiple covariates, with adjusted odds ratio (95% confident interval) of 1.656 (1.125-2.438). The prevalence of LPR among Chinese adolescents was high. Further analytic studies with strict design are required to test the association between LPR and free sugar consumption. Systematic strategies and policies should to be developed to reduce the intake of free sugars in order to prevent LPR.

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and recurrent (ROM) or chronic otitis media with effusion (COME)., Databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library., Methods: Three authors searched articles published between January 1980 and September 2020 about the association between LPR and the development of recurrent or chronic otitis media. Inclusion, exclusion, diagnostic criteria, and clinical outcome evaluation of included studies were analyzed using PRISMA criteria. The bias analysis of included studies was evaluated with the Tool to assess Risk of Bias of the CLARITY group., Results: Twenty-six clinical and three experimental articles met our inclusion criteria, accounting for 1,624 children and 144 adults with COME or ROM. According to the pH study type, the prevalence of LPR and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in OM patients were 28.7% (range, 8-100%) and 40.7 (range, 18-64%), respectively. The majority of studies identified pepsin or pepsinogen in middle ear effusion, with a range of mean concentrations depending on the technique used to measure pepsin. There was an important heterogeneity between studies regarding definition of COME, ROM, and LPR, exclusion criteria, methods used to measure pepsin/pepsinogen in middle ear secretions and outcome assessments., Conclusion: The association between LPR and OM is still unclear. Future clinical and experimental studies are needed to investigate the association between LPR and OM in both children and adults through extensive gastric content analysis in middle ear suppurations and impedance-pH monitoring considering acid, weakly acid, and alkaline reflux events., Competing Interests: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Background and Aim: Esophageal motor dysfunction may underlie impaired bolus/refluxate clearance in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility and its correlation with reflux parameters and symptoms in LPR is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of coexisting esophageal dysmotility among patients with suspected LPR., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 194 consecutive patients with LPR symptoms referred for high-resolution manometry (HRM) and combined hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH testing at a tertiary center in March 2018 to August 2019. Validated symptom surveys were prospectively collected at time of testing, including Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire, dominant symptom intensity, and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey. HRM findings were categorized using Chicago Classification v3.0., Results: Abnormal findings on HRM were identified in 84 (43.3%) patients, with ineffective esophageal motility (n = 60, 30.9%) as the most common diagnosis. A disorder of esophagogastric junction outflow or a major disorder of peristalsis was identified in 26 (13.4%) patients, including 2 (1%) with achalasia and 7 (3.6%) with jackhammer esophagus. Reflux burden (distal, proximal, or pharyngeal) on combined hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH testing did not differ across HRM findings. Patients reporting esophageal symptoms were more likely to have a primary motility disorder (odds ratio 2.34, P = 0.04). However, no significant differences in Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire, or 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey were noted across HRM diagnoses., Conclusion: Esophageal motility disorders are prevalent among patients with LPR symptoms, including up to one in seven with esophagogastric junction outflow or major peristaltic disorder. Patients with abnormal motility more likely report esophageal symptoms. Clinicians should be aware of these coexisting conditions, particularly in those with refractory symptoms., (© 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate worldwide practices of otolaryngologists in the management of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)., Methods: An online survey was sent on the management of LPR to members of many otolaryngological societies. The following aspects were evaluated: LPR definition, prevalence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment., Results: A total of 824 otolaryngologists participated, spread over 65 countries. The symptoms most usually attributed to LPR are cough after lying down/meal, throat clearing and globus sensation while LPR-related findings are arytenoid erythema and posterior commissure hypertrophy. Irrespective to geography, otolaryngologists indicate lack of familiarity with impedance pH monitoring, which they attribute to lack of knowledge in result interpretation. The most common therapeutic regimens significantly vary between world regions, with a higher use of H2 blocker in North America and a lower use of alginate in South America. The duration of treatment also significantly varies between different regions, with West Asia/Africa and East Asia/Oceania otolaryngologists prescribing medication for a shorter period than the others. Only 21.1% of respondents are aware about the existence of nonacid LPR. Overall, only 43.2% of otolaryngologists believe themselves sufficiently knowledgeable about LPR., Conclusions: LPR knowledge and management significantly vary across the world. International guidelines on LPR definition, diagnosis, and treatment are needed to improve knowledge and management around the world., Level of Evidence: N.A. Laryngoscope, 131:E1589-E1597, 2021., (© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).)

Purpose: Local neck symptoms (LNS) may be related to goiter, but are also reported by patients suffering from laryngeal-pharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to investigate whether LPR could play a role in the persistence of some LNS after total thyroidectomy (TT)., Methods: A consecutive case series of 160 patients with multinodular goiter (MNG) candidate for TT were included in this study. Each patient was closely studied for both the thyroid pathology and reflux disease before and 6 months after surgery to assess the persistence of LNS after surgery., Results: Only throat discomfort showed a significant improvement (p  = 0.031) after surgery. On the other hand, swallowing and voice disorders persisted after surgery in 82.3% and 77.3% of patients, respectively (p  = 0.250 and p  = 0.062), such as the correlated reflux laryngopharyngitis (p  = 0.5)., Conclusions: LPR can be considered a predisposing factor or an important concurrent causa to the persistence of LNS after TT, in particular for swallowing disorders and voice disorders. In patients with non-toxic MNG who complain of local neck symptoms, the investigation of a possible coexistence of a reflux disease is appropriate before surgery. Patients should be informed about the possibility that some symptoms can persist even after removal of the goiter.

Objectives: Many studies on the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) were based on symptoms, but there are few research on it using reflux monitoring. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between GERD and LPR based on pH monitoring., Methods: All patients were scheduled for esophageal manometry and pH monitoring sequentially. They were stratified into 4 groups as no reflux disease, isolated GERD, isolated LPR (iLPR), and GERD combined with LPR (GERD&LPR) according to pH monitoring., Results: The incidence of LPR in GERD was 46.3%, while the probability of combining GERD in LPR was 52.7%. The reflux profile in the laryngopharynx showed a significant difference in the total reflux time (17.82 ± 18.4 vs 9.62 ± 9.58, P = .023) and the percentage of total reflux time (1.31% ± 1.37% vs 0.71% ± .0.73%, P = .023) between the GERD&LPR and iLPR groups., Conclusion: Laryngopharyngeal reflux can be combined with GERD or it can exist as an independent diagnosis. In patients with GERD&LPR, the total reflux time and the percentage of reflux time in the laryngopharynx are higher than those in the iLPR group. Reflux episodes in the laryngopharynx of patients with GERD&LPR may be derived from GERD.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common medical condition worldwide. It is an inflammation in the nasal mucosa due to allergen exposure throughout the year. Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is another medical condition that can overlap with AR. LPR can be considered an extra oesophageal manifestation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or a different entity. Its diagnosis imposes a real challenge as it has a wide range of unspecific symptoms. Although AR and LPR are not life-threatening, they can severely affect the quality of life for years and cause substantial distress. Moreover, having AR is associated with having asthma which is also in turn associated with GORD. This is a cross-sectional study which used surveys distributed online on Social Media and targeted people across Syria. All participants who responded to the key questions were included. Reflux symptom index (RSI) was used for LPR, and score for allergic rhinitis (SFAR) was used for AR. Demographic questions and whether the participant had asthma were also included in the survey. We found that there was an association between the symptoms of LPR and AR p < 0.0001 (OR, 2.592; 95% CI 1.846-3.639), and their scores were significantly correlated (r = 0.334). Having asthma was associated with LPR symptoms p = 0.0002 (OR 3.096; 95% CI 1.665-5.759) and AR p < 0.0001 (OR 6.772; 95% CI 2.823-16.248). We concluded that there was a significant association between having LPR, AR, and asthma. We need more studies to distinguish between their common symptoms and aetiologies.

Objective: To compare the clinical characteristics of patients with different type of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in order to study the effect of non-acid reflux on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Methods: From January 2015 to January 2020, 349 inpatients or outpatients suspected of having laryngopharyngeal reflux underwent 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH). There were 303 male and 46 female patients, with an average age of 56.03 years old ranged from 25 to 81 years old. The reflux symptom index (RSI)and reflux findings score(RFS)were recorded before MII-pH monitoring. The number of acid reflux events and non-acid reflux events in hypopharynx were counted. It was defined mainly acid reflux type when the ratio of acid reflux to all reflux events was greater than 50%, mainly non-acid reflux type when the ratio of non-acid reflux to all reflux events was greater than 50%. The clinical characteristics of patients with different type of reflux were compared. SPSS 19.0 software was used for statistical analysis, and multiple independent samples were compared between groups. The quantitative data were analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance, and the counting data were analyzed by chi-square test, the difference was statistically significant when P <0.05. Results: The 24-hour MII-pH showed that there were 90 patients with no reflux events, 51 patients with mainly acid reflux type, 198 patients with mainly non-acid reflux type and 10 patients with equal acid reflux events and non-acid reflux events. Statistics showed that the RSI(10.72±4.40), RFS(7.70±2.73) and the average number of reflux events(0) in the group without reflux events were significantly lower than those in patients with mainly acid reflux type (RSI 13.16±6.62,RFS 10.08±3.03,average number of reflux events 5.33±3.15, P <0.05) and mainly non-acid reflux type(RSI 13.25±5.54,RFS 8.81±2.54,average number of reflux events 7.93±5.26, P <0.05). There was no significant difference in RSI between the mainly non-acid reflux type group and the mainly acid reflux type group, but the RFS of the mainly non-acid reflux type group was significantly lower than that of the mainly acid reflux type group. The average number of reflux events in the mainly non-acid reflux group was significantly higher than that in the mainly acid reflux type group ( P <0.05). Conclusion: The results show that non-acid reflux plays a certain role in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease, but the effect of acid reflux is greater.

Background: Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) may be part of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). However, sometimes suspected LPR seems refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI), questioning therefore the GERD diagnosis. Our aim was to evaluate the real-life prevalence of GERD in patients with a recent laryngoscopic diagnosis of LPR, and unresponsive to PPI. We also assessed whether other causes than GERD could explain the laryngoscopic findings in those patients., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with the diagnosis of LPR, and unresponsive to PPI. Those patients must have been investigated by: upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies; multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH); X-ray of the chest and/or of the paranasal sinuses; hormonal thyroid assessment; prick tests to assess food and/or inhalants and pollen allergy., Results: We enrolled 28 patients (18, 64.3%, males and 10, 35.7%, females; median, IQR age 39.4, 21-75 yrs). Endoscopic hiatal hernia was found in 9/28 (32.1%) patients; the MII-pH analysis showed abnormality in 2/28 (7.14%) patients (both having also GERD symptoms); Chest X-ray found chest diseases in 2/28 (7.14%) patients and X-rays of the paranasal sinuses found sinusitis in 1/28 (3.6%); 2/28 (7.14%) patients had hyperthyroidism; food and/or inhalants and pollen allergy was found in 9 (32.1%) patients. In 12/28 (42.9%) patients, any of the investigated diseases was found., Conclusions: This study found that the real prevalence of GERD in patients with a recent laryngoscopic diagnosis of LPR, and unresponsive to PPI, is low. Moreover, more than 40% of them did not show any of the investigated diseases in real life., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Introduction: Vocal fold leukoplakia (VFL) has a risk of malignant transformation, and the underlying mechanisms are currently unrecognized. Some clinical evidence has indicated that laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) probably plays a critical role., Objective: To explore the risk factors associated with the occurrence of VFL and to investigate the importance of LPR in VFL and its different pathological types using 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring., Materials and Methods: Eighty-one patients with VFL and 27 healthy volunteers were recruited. General information and LPR parameters were analyzed., Results: The monitoring showed that 35.8% (29/81) of patients had acidic LPR and that 43.2% (35/81) had weakly acidic LPR. Heavy drinking (odds ratio = 4.004, p = 0.037) and acidic LPR (odds ratio = 4.471, p = 0.029) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of VFL. Acidic LPR showed a strong correlation with the Reflux Finding Score (p < 0.05) in patients suspected of having LPR based on the scale score. Meanwhile, weakly acidic LPR parameters increased with the severity of pathological degrees which were higher in high-grade dysplasia (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Our study confirms the importance of LPR in VFL. Heavy drinking patients with VFL, particularly those with acidic LPR, should undergo intensive treatment. Meanwhile, weakly acidic LPR may play a critical role in the pathological changes in VFL., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives/hypothesis: Otolaryngologic symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and their diagnostic utility are not well studied. We aimed to elucidate the prevalence of otolaryngologic symptoms among patients being evaluated for OSA. Given findings that the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) was strongly associated with OSA status, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of the RSI for predicting OSA status., Study Design: Cross-sectional., Methods: We recruited 101 adults presenting for ambulatory polysomnograms to the Northwestern Sleep Disorders Center from July 2017 to July 2018. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), RSI, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire 7, and Headache Impact Test were administered. Polysomnogram results were subsequently obtained. Patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5) and without OSA were compared., Results: Of the 101 participants, 98 had valid sleep study results. Of those, 72 were diagnosed with OSA and 26 were not. The two groups differed significantly in age and body mass index (BMI). Of the questionnaires, only the RSI and LCQ means differed significantly, with worse symptoms in the OSA group (P = .003 and .014, respectively). Upon univariate regression, age, BMI, and RSI were associated with OSA status. Using regression coefficients, a clinical score of 2 (RSI) + 1.5 (BMI) + age yielded a diagnostic model (C-statistic = 0.807, P < .001). A threshold score of 104.21 was 76.4% sensitive and 73.1% specific., Conclusions: Patients with OSA have worse symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux as measured by the RSI. The addition of the RSI to the recognized factors of age and BMI improves diagnostic utility for OSA., Level of Evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 2020., (© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives: To demonstrate the burden of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in Syria and its associated variables., Design: This is a cross-sectional study that used online questionnaires that included demographics, smoking, war-related questions and reflux symptom index (RSI)., Setting: This research was conducted online across Syria and included the general population., Participants: Participants who lived in Syria, agreed to participate, and responded to all the RSI questions were included. This research comprised 734 participants, with 94.6% response rate, 75.5% being females, and a mean age of 24 years., Results: Overall, 31.9% of subjects had symptoms suggestive of LPR. Participants who were 30 years and younger had fewer symptoms suggestive of LPR compared with the older group p=0.012 (OR 0.534; 95% CI 0.325 to 0.877). While having an epigastric burning sensation, chest pain and indigestion were the most common symptoms, having a sore throat was the least common. Being distressed from war noises was associated with more symptoms p=0.009 (OR 1.562; 95% CI 1.117 to 2.183). However, losing someone or changing place of living due to war were not significantly associated with these symptoms p>0.05. RSI scores were associated with cigarette and/or shisha smoking p<0.05. Finally, asthma, allergic disorders and having a job were associated with having LPR symptoms p<0.05. No significant findings were observed in consanguinity, marital status, educational level and socioeconomic status., Conclusions: War, smoking, asthma, allergies, respiratory conditions and having a job were associated with LPR symptoms. However, they may be associated with these symptoms independently from LPR; for instance, similar symptoms can be caused by the mental disorders from war, the unique environment and irritant substances of the laryngeal mucosa., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To detect Helicobacter Pylori [HP] in tonsillar tissue of recurrent tonsillitis cases and assess the possible role of Laryngopharyngeal reflux [LPR] in tonsillar HP infection., Methods: A prospective study was done on the cited subject in a sample size of 50 paediatric patients [Age group: 6-18 years] suffering from recurrent tonsillitis. LPR was diagnosed by Reflux Symptom index [RSI] and Reflux Finding score [RFS]. A score of more than 7 and 13 was regarded as significant for RFS and RSI respectively. Patients with both scores significant were regarded to be suffering from LPR. Tonsillar specimen after tonsillectomy were subjected to urease test, histopathology [ Modified Giemsa Staining] and culture to detect HP. A minimum of two positive tests of the mentioned three were taken as gold standard to diagnose colonization of HP. Tabulated data was statistically analysed., Results: We recorded an incidence of 9% [18 cases] for LPR in recurrent tonsillitis. No case of HP colonization of tonsils was detected in this case series, even in patients of LPR., Conclusion: We conclude that tonsils are not an extra gastric reservoir of HP. In addition, there is no aetiological relationship between recurrent tonsillitis and HP. And lastly, LPR is not a significant factor for colonization of tonsils by HP., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: We aimed to analyze the results of 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-monitoring (MII-pH) of the laryngopharynx and esophagus in asymptomatic volunteers. Moreover, we also aimed to gain insight into and establish a baseline for laryngopharyngeal reflux in the healthy population by quantitatively and qualitatively comparing the reflux and pH distribution in both the laryngopharynx and the esophagus., Methods: Healthy volunteers were recruited and observed; they underwent 24-h ambulatory combined MII-pH monitoring. The proximal sensor (pH1) was positioned approximately 1 cm above the upper esophageal sphincter with the aid of a solid-state high-resolution esophageal manometer. Laryngopharyngeal reflux events were detected and characterized by the incidence and property of reflux both in the laryngopharynx and the esophagus., Results: Thirty-eight asymptomatic volunteers who completed all the examinations were included in this study. The median pH detected by the proximal sensor was 6.6 (6.2, 7.0), with an average of 6.58 ± 0.74. A total of 814 laryngopharyngeal reflux events were detected, including 722 (89%) in the upright position and 92 (11%) in the supine position with incidence (0%) in the liquid state, 44 (5%) in the mixture, and 769 (95%) in the gaseous state. Furthermore, 5 incidences (1%) of acid reflux and 809 incidences of non-acid reflux (99%) were noted. A total of 5779 esophageal reflux events were detected, including 5020 (87%) in the upright position, 759 (13%) in the supine position, with 2051 (36%) in the liquid state, 2050 (35%) in the mixed condition, and 1678 (29%) in the gaseous state; adding up to 805 incidences (14%) of acid reflux and 4974 incidences (86%) of non-acid reflux., Conclusion: Non-acid reflux in the upright position is characteristic of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Acid reflux is almost undetectable in healthy subjects. Hence, the diagnostic indicators of gastroesophageal reflux disease are not suitable for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Purpose: Using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), this nationwide study aimed to investigate the incidence, diagnostic status, risk factors, and common symptoms of adult laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) at otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) clinics in China., Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional survey began at the different institutions ranged from July to October 2017, and the duration was 12 months. A total of 90,440 eligible patients were finally enrolled from 72 medical institutions in China. All these patients completed the questionnaire based on RSI. In this study, LPRD was defined as RSI > 13., Results: There were 9182 with LPRD among the 90,440 eligible participants (10.15%). However, only 1294 had a history of LPRD diagnosis among those with LPRD (14.09%). There were regional differences in the frequency of LPRD (P < 0.001). The proportions of patients with LPRD in males (vs. females), middle- and old-aged patients (vs. young), with current smoking history (vs. no smoking), and current drinking history (vs. no drinking) were significantly higher (all P < 0.001). Middle and old age, current smoking, and drinking history were independent predictors of LPRD (all P < 0.001, OR 1.240, 1.261, and 1.481, respectively). "Sensations of something stuck in throat or a lump in throat", "clearing throat", and "excess throat mucus or postnasal drip" were the most frequent clinical symptoms in patients with LPRD., Conclusions: LPRD has a high incidence at the OHNS clinics in China. However, the diagnostic status of this disease is not optimistic. Older age, smoking, and drinking history were risk factors for LPRD.

Objective: To analyze the role of nonacid reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases (LPRD)., Methods: From January 2014 to April 2019, 344 patients associated with LPRD underwent 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, and their reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) were recorded. The numbers of acid, weakly acidic and alkaline reflux events in the laryngopharynx were counted, and the consistency analysis of the results with the results of the RSI and RFS was conducted., Results: Among the 344 patients, nonacid reflux events accounted for 74.1% (1367/1845) of the all reflux events. There were 111 patients with ≥ 3 acid reflux events, 218 patients with ≥ 3 any kinds of reflux events, and 257 patients with positive results of RSI or RFS. Taking the results of the RSI and or RFS as a reference, the sensitivity, specificity and consistency test Kappa value for the diagnosis of LPRD according to the existence of ≥ 3 acid reflux events were 41.2%, 94.2% and 0.228, respectively. With the existence of three or more all kinds of reflux events as the standard, the sensitivity, specificity and consistency test Kappa value were 76.7%, 74.7% and 0.449, respectively., Conclusion: The nonacid reflux events account for the highest proportion of laryngopharyngeal reflux events, and the consistency of the results of RSI and or RFS with all reflux events is higher than that with only acid reflux events, that indicates nonacid reflux may play an important role in LPRD.

The current barrier for investigation of Barrett esophagus (BE) in Asia is diagnostic standardization, which is a challenge to identify its true risk factors. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics and risk factors of BE in Vietnamese patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.A cross-sectional study was conducted on consecutive outpatients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia (ESEM) which was clearly visible at least 1 cm above the gastroesophageal junction at endoscopy was taken biopsy. At least 1 biopsy per 2 cm in tongues of ESEM and 4 biopsies per 2 cm of circumferential ESEM were taken. The diagnostic criterion for BE was replacement of the normal squamous epithelial lining by columnar epithelium confirmed by histology.A total of 1947 patients were recruited. Forty-seven out of 58 patients with ESEM were histologically confirmed BE. The prevalences of BE and hiatal hernia (HH) were 2.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.1%) and 2.3% (95% CI, 1.6-2.9%), respectively. Heartburn and/or regurgitation presented in only 61.7% (95% CI, 46.4-75.5%) of patients with BE. In multivariate analysis, the only 2 factors significantly associated with BE were HH (OR 7.53; 95% CI, 3.13-18.11; P < .001) and typical reflux symptom (OR 2.07; 95% CI, 1.12-3.83; P = .020).BE is not uncommon in Vietnamese patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition, typical reflux symptoms and HH are the risk factors for BE in Vietnamese.

Objectives: To investigate the role of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in the development of dental disorders., Methods: The first outcome was review of the role of reflux in the development of dental disorders in adults. The second outcome was review of the potential pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the association between reflux and dental disorders. Three investigators screened publications for eligibility and exclusion based on predetermined criteria through a literature search conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)., Results: From 386 publications, 24 studies were kept for analysis. Objective approaches were used in 16 studies to confirm GERD diagnosis. Pharyngeal reflux episodes (LPR) were considered in 2 studies. No study considered nonacid reflux. The study results supported a higher prevalence of dental erosion and caries in reflux patients compared with healthy individuals. Patients with dental erosion have a higher prevalence of reflux than controls. The pathophysiological mechanisms would involve changes in the saliva physiology. No study investigated the microbiota modifications related to reflux although the findings are supporting the critical role of microbiota change in the development of dental disorders. There is an important heterogeneity between studies about diagnostic methods and clinical outcome evaluation., Conclusion: The involvement of reflux in the development of dental disorders is not formally demonstrated and requires future investigations considering pharyngeal acid and nonacid reflux episodes and in particular their potential impact on oral microbiota., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has necessitated almost exclusive National Health Service focus on emergency work and cancer care. There are concerns that increased hospital and community pressures will lead to decreased referrals and worse outcomes for head and neck cancer patients., Method: This is a retrospective review of all cases referred for suspected head and neck cancer to our institution in January and April 2020., Results: There was a 55 per cent decrease in referrals but diagnostic yield rose from 2.9 per cent in January to 8.06 per cent in April. In both months, 100 per cent of patients met the 31- and 62-day targets, with similar 14-day wait time success (97.83 per cent for January vs 98.33 per cent for April). Referrals for laryngopharyngeal reflux rose from 27.5 per cent to 41.9 per cent. Referrals for those aged over 60 years fell from 42 per cent to 26 per cent., Conclusion: It is suggested that further research be conducted into the reasons why fewer patients were referred, particularly elderly patients, and why laryngopharyngeal reflux is so prevalent in fast-track referrals.

Background: Salivary pepsin measurement has been reported to be useful for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of salivary pepsin measurement in patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory GERD symptoms without erosive esophagitis., Methods: One hundred and two patients were included. Over seven days after terminating PPI treatment, all patients underwent a 24-h pH-impedance test and salivary pepsin measurement. In patients whose main symptoms included laryngopharyngeal symptoms, a hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII) test was performed, whereas in other patients, a conventional combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) test was performed. In the HMII tests, patients were divided into abnormal proximal exposure (APE) and non-APE groups. Salivary pepsin concentrations were compared according to acid exposure time (AET) values and were also compared between the APE and non-APE groups., Results: The median salivary pepsin concentration in patients with AET > 6% was significantly higher than that in patients with AET ≤ 6% (345.0 [170.0-469.3] ng/mL vs. 120.0 [97.0-290.1] ng/mL, p < 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a positive test (> 109 ng/mL) to diagnose patients with AET > 6% were 75.0%, 51.3%, 32.1%, and 86.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference between concentrations in the APE group and concentrations in the non-APE group., Conclusions: In patients with PPI-refractory nonerosive reflux disease, salivary pepsin measurement may help diagnose patients who have conclusive evidence of reflux, whereas it is not adequate for identifying patients with APE.

This study aims to explore associations between emotional eating, depression and laryngopharyngeal reflux among college students in Hunan Province., Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 1301 students at two universities in Hunan. Electronic questionnaires were used to collect information about the students' emotional eating, depressive symptoms, laryngopharyngeal reflux and sociodemographic characteristics. Anthropometric measurements were collected to obtain body mass index (BMI)., Results: High emotional eating was reported by 52.7% of students. The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 18.6% and that of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms 8.1%. Both emotional eating and depressive symptoms were associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms (AOR = 3.822, 95% CI 2.126-6.871 vs. AOR = 4.093, 95% CI 2.516-6.661)., Conclusion: The prevalence of emotional eating and depressive symptoms among Chinese college students should be pay more attention in the future. Emotional eating and depressive symptoms were positively associated with laryngopharyngeal symptoms. The characteristics of emotional eating require further study so that effective interventions to promote laryngopharyngeal health among college students may be formulated., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Purpose: To use the synchronous esophageal and oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring analysis to investigate the relationship between LPRD and GERD., Materials and Methods: Synchronous esophageal and oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring, electronic gastroscopy, reflux symptom index (RSI) and gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire (Gerd-Q) were collected from 514 consecutive patients and comparative analysis was done., Results: A total of 85 patients had positive Ryan score and 251 cases had positive DeMeester or acid exposure time percent (AET) ≥4.2%. Moreover, 61.2% (52/85) of all LPRD cases were pure LPRD without GERD. There was no statistical difference in the acid exposure to oropharynx between pure LPRD group and LPRD+GERD group (U test, P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no statistical differences in the other esophageal reflux data between pure GERD without LPRD group and LPRD+GERD group (U test, P > 0.05) apart from the number of episodes, which was higher in the pure GERD group than in LPRD+GERD group (U test, P = 0.027). Additionally, 149 patients were diagnosed with reflux esophagitis by electronic gastroscopy. No significant difference in the acid exposure to oropharynx was seen between different grades of reflux esophagitis (U test, P > 0.05). Among the LPRD patients, 32 cases (37.6%) were negative for Gerd-Q, Dx-pH esophageal probe and gastroscopy., Conclusion: The results of synchronous esophageal and oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring demonstrated that LPRD and GERD could co-exist as separate medical conditions. Our data suggest that some LPRD are not accompanied by GERD, and that LPRD is not secondary to severe GERD., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate knowledge of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) among otolaryngologists in 3A hospitals in Beijing., Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of LPRD knowledge was conducted with otolaryngologists in 40 3A hospitals in Beijing. A response rate of <80% was obtained from one hospital, so data from 331 valid questionnaires from the other 39 hospitals were analysed., Results: The most common source of LPRD knowledge was academic lectures (80.1%). The most commonly known risk factors, symptoms, clinical signs and associated diseases were unhealthy eating habits (49.2%), foreign body sensation in the pharynx (71.0%), hyperaemia (42.3%) and pharyngolaryngitis (63.7%), respectively. Only 57.7% of otolaryngologists knew about 24-hour pH monitoring as a gold standard diagnostic test for LPRD. The most commonly known treatment option was medication (93.1%). Most physicians (86.7%) had made a clinical diagnosis of LPRD; however, only 59.9% of them had followed up the treatment outcomes. The most common treatment provided was medication (82.6%)., Conclusions: Knowledge of LPRD among otolaryngologists in 3A hospitals in Beijing was insufficient. Educational programs are needed to increase the knowledge of LPRD among otolaryngologists.

Objective: To explore the correlation between sleep and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease by epidemiological approaches. Methods: From May 1, 2017 to April 30, 2018, data of age, gender, height, weight, smoking, alcohol consumption, constipation and high fat diet in patients in Otorhinolaryngology specialist clinic, the Eighth Medical Center, General Hospital of the Chinese PLA were retrospectively analyzed. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)were filled. According to RSI scores, patients were divided into case group and control group. The differences of the above indicators between the two groups were compared by Stata 12.0 software, and the risk factors of LPRD were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression. Results: A total of 908 patients were enrolled, including 166 in the case group and 742 in the control group. There was no significant difference in BMI, smoking, drinking, constipation and high fat diet between the two groups (all P> 0.05). The PSQI, anxiety and depression score of the case group were higher than those of the control group. The anxiety and depression scores of the patients with sleep disorders in the case group were significantly higher than those of the normal sleepers (all P< 0.05). RSI of the patients with sleep disorders was higher than that of the patients with normal sleep(9.5[4.0,16.0] vs . 5.0[1.0,10.0], Z= -6.07, P< 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that sleep disorder was the risk factors of LPRD ( OR= 2.59, 95 %CI 1.75-3.84). Conclusions: Sleep disorder is related to the occurrence of LPRD. The association between LPRD and sleep disturbances is bidirectional. Sleep disorder may also be related to the anxiety and depression in LPRD patients. Handling sleep disorder timely may benefit LPRD patients.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of gastric Helicobacter pylori colonization on nasal functions. The study enrolled patients (n = 100) who underwent endoscopy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) were identified by Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Patients were divided into 2 groups: LPR (+) (n = 64) H pylori (+), RSI > 13, RFS > 7; LPR (-) (n = 36) H pylori (+), RSI < 13, RFS < 7. Visual analog scale (VAS), sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), peak nasal inspiratory flowmeter (PNIF), mucociliary clearance (MCC), and olfactory tests were used to evaluate the nasal functions. The average VAS for nasal obstruction, PNIF, and MCC did not differ significantly between the LPR (+) and LPR (-) groups ( P > .05). However, the average olfactory test scores were lower in the LPR (+) patients than the LPR (-) patients ( P < .05). Also, the SNOT-22 scores were significantly higher in LPR (+) patients than in LPR (-) ( P < .01). Nasal functions and symptom scores were also evaluated according to the H pylori grading. The PNIF, MCC, SNOT-22, and olfactory test results deteriorated as the gastric mucosal H pylori colonization increased ( P < .05). In conclusion, nasal functions differed between LPR disease and GERD only, while the density of H pylori colonization in the gastric mucosa had an effect on nasal function.

Introduction: There is evidence that patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) tend to have a high prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and dysphagia. These diseases are known to share the same risk factors and may be interrelated, but there is a lack of studies evaluating their co-occurrence., Objectives: To evaluate whether the presence of signs and symptoms suggestive of LPR may be associated with the presence of dysphagia in patients with moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), as well as assess the additional impact of these diseases on quality of life in patients with OSA., Methods: Seventy adult patients with moderate or severe OSA were included in the study. The RSI (Reflux Symptom Index) and Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) in dysphagia questionnaires were administered, laryngoscopy was performed to calculate the Reflux Finding Score (RFS), and fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was conducted., Results: The prevalence of LPR was 59.7%, and the prevalence of dysphagia was 27.3%. The association between LPR and dysphagia was present in 17.9% of patients, but with no statistically significant difference. Lower SWAL-QOL scores were observed in several domains in patients with LPR and in only one domain in patients with evidence of dysphagia on FEES., Conclusions: Although 17.9% of patients presented with findings suggestive of concomitant LPR and dysphagia, there was no statistically significant association between these two conditions. Patients with LPR had worse scores in several domains of dysphagia-related quality of life, while FEES evidence of dysphagia was associated with worse quality of life in only one domain.